Flux integral through tricky surface. Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Surface integral (stokes?)Help me understand a surface integral question?Evaluating the surface integral where S is part of a plane and inside a cylinderSurface integral of vector field over a unit ballFlux integral using Stokes' TheoremCalculate the flux through a closed surfaceSurface Integral problem. May be some misconception.Evaluating the surface integral over subset of Cylinder surfaceCalculating FluxShow that $ iint_S fracvec r^3 dS =0 $

Quick way to create a symlink?

Delete nth line from bottom

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

Wu formula for manifolds with boundary

Can a party unilaterally change candidates in preparation for a General election?

For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline

Is it cost-effective to upgrade an old-ish Giant Escape R3 commuter bike with entry-level branded parts (wheels, drivetrain)?

Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

8 Prisoners wearing hats

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

Generate an RGB colour grid

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?

Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other

Is it ethical to give a final exam after the professor has quit before teaching the remaining chapters of the course?

What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in ITSV

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

Apollo command module space walk?

Would "destroying" Wurmcoil Engine prevent its tokens from being created?

Why didn't Eitri join the fight?



Flux integral through tricky surface.



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Surface integral (stokes?)Help me understand a surface integral question?Evaluating the surface integral where S is part of a plane and inside a cylinderSurface integral of vector field over a unit ballFlux integral using Stokes' TheoremCalculate the flux through a closed surfaceSurface Integral problem. May be some misconception.Evaluating the surface integral over subset of Cylinder surfaceCalculating FluxShow that $ iint_S fracvec rvec r dS =0 $










1












$begingroup$


Let $T$ be the area lying in the first octant where $xgeq0,ygeq0,zgeq0$ limited by the surfacs $z=a^2-x^2$ and $y=a^2-x^2$.



Calculate $iint_S vecFcdothatNdS$ where $vecF=(x,y,z)$ for $(x,y,z)inmathbbR^3$, $S$ is the part of the boundary $partial T$ to $T$ that lies on the surface $z=a^2-x^2$ and $hatN$ is the unit normal vector pointing out from $T$.



I have discussed the problem with a couple of friends, and we are all stuck. We where thinking about calculating $DivvecF$ but then again we struggle with the limits of that triple integral. Any help would be really great! Thanks in advance










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Divergence theorem sounds like a good idea. Do you have a model answer to compare with? If so, what value do you expect?
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 13:07











  • $begingroup$
    @StackTD I do not have a model answer :/. We tried calculating the total divergence of $T$ and ended up with $8a^5/5$, but I reckon we have to subtract the flux through the part of the boundary which is not on $z=a^2-x^2$. But yeah, we're stuck. The limits we used for calculating total flux(div) was $0leq xleq a$, $0leq yleq a^2-x^2$ and $0leq zleq a^2-x^2$, with $DIVvecF=3$
    $endgroup$
    – JoeNTNU
    Apr 1 at 13:16











  • $begingroup$
    Is it $y=a^2-colorredx^2$, like in the comment before, or $y=a^2-colorredz^2$, as you wrote in the question?
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 13:38










  • $begingroup$
    @StackTD Oh, mistake by me. $y=a^2-x^2$, I edited it now.
    $endgroup$
    – JoeNTNU
    Apr 1 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    Alright, it was going to get a lot messier if that $x$ was in fact a $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 14:41















1












$begingroup$


Let $T$ be the area lying in the first octant where $xgeq0,ygeq0,zgeq0$ limited by the surfacs $z=a^2-x^2$ and $y=a^2-x^2$.



Calculate $iint_S vecFcdothatNdS$ where $vecF=(x,y,z)$ for $(x,y,z)inmathbbR^3$, $S$ is the part of the boundary $partial T$ to $T$ that lies on the surface $z=a^2-x^2$ and $hatN$ is the unit normal vector pointing out from $T$.



I have discussed the problem with a couple of friends, and we are all stuck. We where thinking about calculating $DivvecF$ but then again we struggle with the limits of that triple integral. Any help would be really great! Thanks in advance










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Divergence theorem sounds like a good idea. Do you have a model answer to compare with? If so, what value do you expect?
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 13:07











  • $begingroup$
    @StackTD I do not have a model answer :/. We tried calculating the total divergence of $T$ and ended up with $8a^5/5$, but I reckon we have to subtract the flux through the part of the boundary which is not on $z=a^2-x^2$. But yeah, we're stuck. The limits we used for calculating total flux(div) was $0leq xleq a$, $0leq yleq a^2-x^2$ and $0leq zleq a^2-x^2$, with $DIVvecF=3$
    $endgroup$
    – JoeNTNU
    Apr 1 at 13:16











  • $begingroup$
    Is it $y=a^2-colorredx^2$, like in the comment before, or $y=a^2-colorredz^2$, as you wrote in the question?
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 13:38










  • $begingroup$
    @StackTD Oh, mistake by me. $y=a^2-x^2$, I edited it now.
    $endgroup$
    – JoeNTNU
    Apr 1 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    Alright, it was going to get a lot messier if that $x$ was in fact a $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 14:41













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Let $T$ be the area lying in the first octant where $xgeq0,ygeq0,zgeq0$ limited by the surfacs $z=a^2-x^2$ and $y=a^2-x^2$.



Calculate $iint_S vecFcdothatNdS$ where $vecF=(x,y,z)$ for $(x,y,z)inmathbbR^3$, $S$ is the part of the boundary $partial T$ to $T$ that lies on the surface $z=a^2-x^2$ and $hatN$ is the unit normal vector pointing out from $T$.



I have discussed the problem with a couple of friends, and we are all stuck. We where thinking about calculating $DivvecF$ but then again we struggle with the limits of that triple integral. Any help would be really great! Thanks in advance










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $T$ be the area lying in the first octant where $xgeq0,ygeq0,zgeq0$ limited by the surfacs $z=a^2-x^2$ and $y=a^2-x^2$.



Calculate $iint_S vecFcdothatNdS$ where $vecF=(x,y,z)$ for $(x,y,z)inmathbbR^3$, $S$ is the part of the boundary $partial T$ to $T$ that lies on the surface $z=a^2-x^2$ and $hatN$ is the unit normal vector pointing out from $T$.



I have discussed the problem with a couple of friends, and we are all stuck. We where thinking about calculating $DivvecF$ but then again we struggle with the limits of that triple integral. Any help would be really great! Thanks in advance







calculus integration vector-fields divergence






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 1 at 13:42







JoeNTNU

















asked Apr 1 at 12:51









JoeNTNUJoeNTNU

63




63











  • $begingroup$
    Divergence theorem sounds like a good idea. Do you have a model answer to compare with? If so, what value do you expect?
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 13:07











  • $begingroup$
    @StackTD I do not have a model answer :/. We tried calculating the total divergence of $T$ and ended up with $8a^5/5$, but I reckon we have to subtract the flux through the part of the boundary which is not on $z=a^2-x^2$. But yeah, we're stuck. The limits we used for calculating total flux(div) was $0leq xleq a$, $0leq yleq a^2-x^2$ and $0leq zleq a^2-x^2$, with $DIVvecF=3$
    $endgroup$
    – JoeNTNU
    Apr 1 at 13:16











  • $begingroup$
    Is it $y=a^2-colorredx^2$, like in the comment before, or $y=a^2-colorredz^2$, as you wrote in the question?
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 13:38










  • $begingroup$
    @StackTD Oh, mistake by me. $y=a^2-x^2$, I edited it now.
    $endgroup$
    – JoeNTNU
    Apr 1 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    Alright, it was going to get a lot messier if that $x$ was in fact a $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 14:41
















  • $begingroup$
    Divergence theorem sounds like a good idea. Do you have a model answer to compare with? If so, what value do you expect?
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 13:07











  • $begingroup$
    @StackTD I do not have a model answer :/. We tried calculating the total divergence of $T$ and ended up with $8a^5/5$, but I reckon we have to subtract the flux through the part of the boundary which is not on $z=a^2-x^2$. But yeah, we're stuck. The limits we used for calculating total flux(div) was $0leq xleq a$, $0leq yleq a^2-x^2$ and $0leq zleq a^2-x^2$, with $DIVvecF=3$
    $endgroup$
    – JoeNTNU
    Apr 1 at 13:16











  • $begingroup$
    Is it $y=a^2-colorredx^2$, like in the comment before, or $y=a^2-colorredz^2$, as you wrote in the question?
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 13:38










  • $begingroup$
    @StackTD Oh, mistake by me. $y=a^2-x^2$, I edited it now.
    $endgroup$
    – JoeNTNU
    Apr 1 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    Alright, it was going to get a lot messier if that $x$ was in fact a $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – StackTD
    Apr 1 at 14:41















$begingroup$
Divergence theorem sounds like a good idea. Do you have a model answer to compare with? If so, what value do you expect?
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Apr 1 at 13:07





$begingroup$
Divergence theorem sounds like a good idea. Do you have a model answer to compare with? If so, what value do you expect?
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Apr 1 at 13:07













$begingroup$
@StackTD I do not have a model answer :/. We tried calculating the total divergence of $T$ and ended up with $8a^5/5$, but I reckon we have to subtract the flux through the part of the boundary which is not on $z=a^2-x^2$. But yeah, we're stuck. The limits we used for calculating total flux(div) was $0leq xleq a$, $0leq yleq a^2-x^2$ and $0leq zleq a^2-x^2$, with $DIVvecF=3$
$endgroup$
– JoeNTNU
Apr 1 at 13:16





$begingroup$
@StackTD I do not have a model answer :/. We tried calculating the total divergence of $T$ and ended up with $8a^5/5$, but I reckon we have to subtract the flux through the part of the boundary which is not on $z=a^2-x^2$. But yeah, we're stuck. The limits we used for calculating total flux(div) was $0leq xleq a$, $0leq yleq a^2-x^2$ and $0leq zleq a^2-x^2$, with $DIVvecF=3$
$endgroup$
– JoeNTNU
Apr 1 at 13:16













$begingroup$
Is it $y=a^2-colorredx^2$, like in the comment before, or $y=a^2-colorredz^2$, as you wrote in the question?
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Apr 1 at 13:38




$begingroup$
Is it $y=a^2-colorredx^2$, like in the comment before, or $y=a^2-colorredz^2$, as you wrote in the question?
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Apr 1 at 13:38












$begingroup$
@StackTD Oh, mistake by me. $y=a^2-x^2$, I edited it now.
$endgroup$
– JoeNTNU
Apr 1 at 13:42




$begingroup$
@StackTD Oh, mistake by me. $y=a^2-x^2$, I edited it now.
$endgroup$
– JoeNTNU
Apr 1 at 13:42












$begingroup$
Alright, it was going to get a lot messier if that $x$ was in fact a $z$.
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Apr 1 at 14:41




$begingroup$
Alright, it was going to get a lot messier if that $x$ was in fact a $z$.
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Apr 1 at 14:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

To make good use of the divergence theorem:



  • verify that the surface integrals through the parts of the coordinate planes that, together with the two given surfaces, bound the region in the first octant, don't contribute to the flux (their share is $0$, which is easy to compute or even simply reason);

  • note that due to symmetry in the two surfaces ($y leftrightarrow z$) that make up $partial T$ and with the given vector field, you expect the same flux through these two parts of $partial T$.

By the divergence theorem you find a total flux of $tfrac85a^5$ so the flux through the part $S$ is half of this: $tfrac45a^5$.




enter image description here



You can verify this by actually computing the surface integral. To do this, we parametrize $S$ (the paraboloid $z=a^2-x^2$ cut off by the paraboloid $y=a^2-x^2$) as follows:
$$vec r(u,v)=left(u,vleft(a^2-u^2right),a^2-u^2right) ;,; 0 le u le a;,; 0 le v le 1$$
Then:
$$vec N=fracpartial vec rpartial utimesfracpartial vec rpartial v=left(2a^2u-2u^3,0,4-u^2right)$$
and:
$$vec F cdot vec N=a^4-u^4$$
so:
$$iint_S vec F cdot vec N,mboxdS = int_0^1 int_0^a left(a^4-u^4right),mboxdu ,mboxdv=frac45a^5$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170573%2fflux-integral-through-tricky-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    To make good use of the divergence theorem:



    • verify that the surface integrals through the parts of the coordinate planes that, together with the two given surfaces, bound the region in the first octant, don't contribute to the flux (their share is $0$, which is easy to compute or even simply reason);

    • note that due to symmetry in the two surfaces ($y leftrightarrow z$) that make up $partial T$ and with the given vector field, you expect the same flux through these two parts of $partial T$.

    By the divergence theorem you find a total flux of $tfrac85a^5$ so the flux through the part $S$ is half of this: $tfrac45a^5$.




    enter image description here



    You can verify this by actually computing the surface integral. To do this, we parametrize $S$ (the paraboloid $z=a^2-x^2$ cut off by the paraboloid $y=a^2-x^2$) as follows:
    $$vec r(u,v)=left(u,vleft(a^2-u^2right),a^2-u^2right) ;,; 0 le u le a;,; 0 le v le 1$$
    Then:
    $$vec N=fracpartial vec rpartial utimesfracpartial vec rpartial v=left(2a^2u-2u^3,0,4-u^2right)$$
    and:
    $$vec F cdot vec N=a^4-u^4$$
    so:
    $$iint_S vec F cdot vec N,mboxdS = int_0^1 int_0^a left(a^4-u^4right),mboxdu ,mboxdv=frac45a^5$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      To make good use of the divergence theorem:



      • verify that the surface integrals through the parts of the coordinate planes that, together with the two given surfaces, bound the region in the first octant, don't contribute to the flux (their share is $0$, which is easy to compute or even simply reason);

      • note that due to symmetry in the two surfaces ($y leftrightarrow z$) that make up $partial T$ and with the given vector field, you expect the same flux through these two parts of $partial T$.

      By the divergence theorem you find a total flux of $tfrac85a^5$ so the flux through the part $S$ is half of this: $tfrac45a^5$.




      enter image description here



      You can verify this by actually computing the surface integral. To do this, we parametrize $S$ (the paraboloid $z=a^2-x^2$ cut off by the paraboloid $y=a^2-x^2$) as follows:
      $$vec r(u,v)=left(u,vleft(a^2-u^2right),a^2-u^2right) ;,; 0 le u le a;,; 0 le v le 1$$
      Then:
      $$vec N=fracpartial vec rpartial utimesfracpartial vec rpartial v=left(2a^2u-2u^3,0,4-u^2right)$$
      and:
      $$vec F cdot vec N=a^4-u^4$$
      so:
      $$iint_S vec F cdot vec N,mboxdS = int_0^1 int_0^a left(a^4-u^4right),mboxdu ,mboxdv=frac45a^5$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        To make good use of the divergence theorem:



        • verify that the surface integrals through the parts of the coordinate planes that, together with the two given surfaces, bound the region in the first octant, don't contribute to the flux (their share is $0$, which is easy to compute or even simply reason);

        • note that due to symmetry in the two surfaces ($y leftrightarrow z$) that make up $partial T$ and with the given vector field, you expect the same flux through these two parts of $partial T$.

        By the divergence theorem you find a total flux of $tfrac85a^5$ so the flux through the part $S$ is half of this: $tfrac45a^5$.




        enter image description here



        You can verify this by actually computing the surface integral. To do this, we parametrize $S$ (the paraboloid $z=a^2-x^2$ cut off by the paraboloid $y=a^2-x^2$) as follows:
        $$vec r(u,v)=left(u,vleft(a^2-u^2right),a^2-u^2right) ;,; 0 le u le a;,; 0 le v le 1$$
        Then:
        $$vec N=fracpartial vec rpartial utimesfracpartial vec rpartial v=left(2a^2u-2u^3,0,4-u^2right)$$
        and:
        $$vec F cdot vec N=a^4-u^4$$
        so:
        $$iint_S vec F cdot vec N,mboxdS = int_0^1 int_0^a left(a^4-u^4right),mboxdu ,mboxdv=frac45a^5$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        To make good use of the divergence theorem:



        • verify that the surface integrals through the parts of the coordinate planes that, together with the two given surfaces, bound the region in the first octant, don't contribute to the flux (their share is $0$, which is easy to compute or even simply reason);

        • note that due to symmetry in the two surfaces ($y leftrightarrow z$) that make up $partial T$ and with the given vector field, you expect the same flux through these two parts of $partial T$.

        By the divergence theorem you find a total flux of $tfrac85a^5$ so the flux through the part $S$ is half of this: $tfrac45a^5$.




        enter image description here



        You can verify this by actually computing the surface integral. To do this, we parametrize $S$ (the paraboloid $z=a^2-x^2$ cut off by the paraboloid $y=a^2-x^2$) as follows:
        $$vec r(u,v)=left(u,vleft(a^2-u^2right),a^2-u^2right) ;,; 0 le u le a;,; 0 le v le 1$$
        Then:
        $$vec N=fracpartial vec rpartial utimesfracpartial vec rpartial v=left(2a^2u-2u^3,0,4-u^2right)$$
        and:
        $$vec F cdot vec N=a^4-u^4$$
        so:
        $$iint_S vec F cdot vec N,mboxdS = int_0^1 int_0^a left(a^4-u^4right),mboxdu ,mboxdv=frac45a^5$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Apr 5 at 12:32

























        answered Apr 1 at 14:18









        StackTDStackTD

        24.3k2254




        24.3k2254



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170573%2fflux-integral-through-tricky-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

            Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleaguesHow can I better understand manager or clients with strong accents?Adding more movement and speech at the fundamental level to a highly-sedentary job?Difficulty in understanding Manager's accent(language and communication)How to adjust yourself where your colleagues are not understanding to you?Understanding manager's expectationsForeigner and colleagues using slangHaving difficulty understanding meetingsHow do you breathe when giving a speech?Trouble Waking Up for Emergencies (On-Call)Problems with colleaguesColleagues feeling insecure when I do my work

            Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O