Frobenius automorphism and cyclotomic extension Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Silly question about a particular Frobenius automorphismThe polynomial $x^p-x-1/p$ over $mathbb Q_p$Equivalence of Valuations - Trouble Understanding ProofElements in one Galois extension that act trivially on another Galois extensionShow that $U_i rightarrow U_i+e, x mapsto x^p$ is an isomorphismDifference between the Artin symbol and the Frobenius element?If primes split nicely, is it a Galois extension?Showing that the ray class field of $Bbb Q(i)$ modulo $(2)$ is equal to $Bbb Q(i)$Why is the local polynomial of an Artin representation independent of the choice of the Frobenius element?Characterization of finite cyclic totally ramified extension of local fields with prime power degree

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

Would "destroying" Wurmcoil Engine prevent its tokens from being created?

Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?

First console to have temporary backward compatibility

Is there any way for the UK Prime Minister to make a motion directly dependent on Government confidence?

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

Is it cost-effective to upgrade an old-ish Giant Escape R3 commuter bike with entry-level branded parts (wheels, drivetrain)?

Extracting terms with certain heads in a function

Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?

How to Make a Beautiful Stacked 3D Plot

Why didn't Eitri join the fight?

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline

What is homebrew?

Is there a kind of relay only consumes power when switching?

Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

What do you call the main part of a joke?

8 Prisoners wearing hats

If my PI received research grants from a company to be able to pay my postdoc salary, did I have a potential conflict interest too?

Declining "dulcis" in context

2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?

Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?

Can a party unilaterally change candidates in preparation for a General election?



Frobenius automorphism and cyclotomic extension



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Silly question about a particular Frobenius automorphismThe polynomial $x^p-x-1/p$ over $mathbb Q_p$Equivalence of Valuations - Trouble Understanding ProofElements in one Galois extension that act trivially on another Galois extensionShow that $U_i rightarrow U_i+e, x mapsto x^p$ is an isomorphismDifference between the Artin symbol and the Frobenius element?If primes split nicely, is it a Galois extension?Showing that the ray class field of $Bbb Q(i)$ modulo $(2)$ is equal to $Bbb Q(i)$Why is the local polynomial of an Artin representation independent of the choice of the Frobenius element?Characterization of finite cyclic totally ramified extension of local fields with prime power degree










3












$begingroup$


There is a lemma from a lecture I attended where I scribbled down notes and try to make sense of the proof afterwards and there is a spot at which I am stuck. First I have to set up some notations and refresh memory on Frobenius element.



Let $l,p$ be distinct odd primes, $L = mathbbQ(zeta_l)$, $K$ be the unique quadractic subfield contained in $L$. (To see what $K$ is, we know that $Gal(L/mathbbQ) =(mathbbZ/lmathbbZ)^*$ has a unique subgroup $H$ of index 2, and by Galois theory, $K$ would then be $L^H$).



By definition, $Frob_p$ is defined as follows. We know $p$ is unramified in $L$. If $mathfrakqsubseteq O_L$ is any prime ideal containing $pcdot O_L$, then the decomposition group at $mathfrakq$ defined as $G_mathfrakq:=sigmain Gal(L/mathbbQ) : sigma(mathfrakq)=mathfrakq$ is isomorphic to $Gal((O_L/mathfrakq)/mathbbF_p)$. The latter has Frobenius element $xmapsto x^p$. The corresponding element in $G_mathfrakq$ is denoted $Frob_p$. Note that $Frob_p$ does not depend on the choice of $mathfrakq$ because the extension is Abelian.



Lemma: $Frob_pin Gal(L/mathbbQ)$ is in $H$ if and only if $p$ splits in $K$.



Proof: Let $mathfrakp_1 subseteq O_K$ be a prime factor of $pcdot O_K$. Then $Frob_pin H$ $Leftrightarrow$ $Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$ $Leftrightarrow$ $xmapsto x^p$ is identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$ $Leftrightarrow$ $O_K/mathfrakp_1 = mathbbF_p$ $Leftrightarrow$ $p$ splits in $K$.



The line that I do not get is "$Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$ $Leftrightarrow$ $xmapsto x^p$ is identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$". I think I have the forward implication, but could someone enlighten me on the backward implication?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    There is a lemma from a lecture I attended where I scribbled down notes and try to make sense of the proof afterwards and there is a spot at which I am stuck. First I have to set up some notations and refresh memory on Frobenius element.



    Let $l,p$ be distinct odd primes, $L = mathbbQ(zeta_l)$, $K$ be the unique quadractic subfield contained in $L$. (To see what $K$ is, we know that $Gal(L/mathbbQ) =(mathbbZ/lmathbbZ)^*$ has a unique subgroup $H$ of index 2, and by Galois theory, $K$ would then be $L^H$).



    By definition, $Frob_p$ is defined as follows. We know $p$ is unramified in $L$. If $mathfrakqsubseteq O_L$ is any prime ideal containing $pcdot O_L$, then the decomposition group at $mathfrakq$ defined as $G_mathfrakq:=sigmain Gal(L/mathbbQ) : sigma(mathfrakq)=mathfrakq$ is isomorphic to $Gal((O_L/mathfrakq)/mathbbF_p)$. The latter has Frobenius element $xmapsto x^p$. The corresponding element in $G_mathfrakq$ is denoted $Frob_p$. Note that $Frob_p$ does not depend on the choice of $mathfrakq$ because the extension is Abelian.



    Lemma: $Frob_pin Gal(L/mathbbQ)$ is in $H$ if and only if $p$ splits in $K$.



    Proof: Let $mathfrakp_1 subseteq O_K$ be a prime factor of $pcdot O_K$. Then $Frob_pin H$ $Leftrightarrow$ $Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$ $Leftrightarrow$ $xmapsto x^p$ is identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$ $Leftrightarrow$ $O_K/mathfrakp_1 = mathbbF_p$ $Leftrightarrow$ $p$ splits in $K$.



    The line that I do not get is "$Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$ $Leftrightarrow$ $xmapsto x^p$ is identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$". I think I have the forward implication, but could someone enlighten me on the backward implication?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      There is a lemma from a lecture I attended where I scribbled down notes and try to make sense of the proof afterwards and there is a spot at which I am stuck. First I have to set up some notations and refresh memory on Frobenius element.



      Let $l,p$ be distinct odd primes, $L = mathbbQ(zeta_l)$, $K$ be the unique quadractic subfield contained in $L$. (To see what $K$ is, we know that $Gal(L/mathbbQ) =(mathbbZ/lmathbbZ)^*$ has a unique subgroup $H$ of index 2, and by Galois theory, $K$ would then be $L^H$).



      By definition, $Frob_p$ is defined as follows. We know $p$ is unramified in $L$. If $mathfrakqsubseteq O_L$ is any prime ideal containing $pcdot O_L$, then the decomposition group at $mathfrakq$ defined as $G_mathfrakq:=sigmain Gal(L/mathbbQ) : sigma(mathfrakq)=mathfrakq$ is isomorphic to $Gal((O_L/mathfrakq)/mathbbF_p)$. The latter has Frobenius element $xmapsto x^p$. The corresponding element in $G_mathfrakq$ is denoted $Frob_p$. Note that $Frob_p$ does not depend on the choice of $mathfrakq$ because the extension is Abelian.



      Lemma: $Frob_pin Gal(L/mathbbQ)$ is in $H$ if and only if $p$ splits in $K$.



      Proof: Let $mathfrakp_1 subseteq O_K$ be a prime factor of $pcdot O_K$. Then $Frob_pin H$ $Leftrightarrow$ $Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$ $Leftrightarrow$ $xmapsto x^p$ is identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$ $Leftrightarrow$ $O_K/mathfrakp_1 = mathbbF_p$ $Leftrightarrow$ $p$ splits in $K$.



      The line that I do not get is "$Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$ $Leftrightarrow$ $xmapsto x^p$ is identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$". I think I have the forward implication, but could someone enlighten me on the backward implication?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      There is a lemma from a lecture I attended where I scribbled down notes and try to make sense of the proof afterwards and there is a spot at which I am stuck. First I have to set up some notations and refresh memory on Frobenius element.



      Let $l,p$ be distinct odd primes, $L = mathbbQ(zeta_l)$, $K$ be the unique quadractic subfield contained in $L$. (To see what $K$ is, we know that $Gal(L/mathbbQ) =(mathbbZ/lmathbbZ)^*$ has a unique subgroup $H$ of index 2, and by Galois theory, $K$ would then be $L^H$).



      By definition, $Frob_p$ is defined as follows. We know $p$ is unramified in $L$. If $mathfrakqsubseteq O_L$ is any prime ideal containing $pcdot O_L$, then the decomposition group at $mathfrakq$ defined as $G_mathfrakq:=sigmain Gal(L/mathbbQ) : sigma(mathfrakq)=mathfrakq$ is isomorphic to $Gal((O_L/mathfrakq)/mathbbF_p)$. The latter has Frobenius element $xmapsto x^p$. The corresponding element in $G_mathfrakq$ is denoted $Frob_p$. Note that $Frob_p$ does not depend on the choice of $mathfrakq$ because the extension is Abelian.



      Lemma: $Frob_pin Gal(L/mathbbQ)$ is in $H$ if and only if $p$ splits in $K$.



      Proof: Let $mathfrakp_1 subseteq O_K$ be a prime factor of $pcdot O_K$. Then $Frob_pin H$ $Leftrightarrow$ $Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$ $Leftrightarrow$ $xmapsto x^p$ is identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$ $Leftrightarrow$ $O_K/mathfrakp_1 = mathbbF_p$ $Leftrightarrow$ $p$ splits in $K$.



      The line that I do not get is "$Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$ $Leftrightarrow$ $xmapsto x^p$ is identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$". I think I have the forward implication, but could someone enlighten me on the backward implication?







      abstract-algebra number-theory algebraic-number-theory galois-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 1 at 12:55









      Community

      1




      1










      asked Apr 29 '15 at 19:41









      suncup224suncup224

      1,211816




      1,211816




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I think you're missing the following useful observation: $Frob_p$ is characterized by the property $Frob_p x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakq$ for all $x$ in $O_L$. That $Frob_p$ has this property follows from your definition. To see that it is determined among all automorphisms of $L$ by this property, note that if for some automorphism $sigma$ of $L$ we have $sigma x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakq$, then letting $x$ be in $mathfrakq$, we see that $sigma$ fixes $mathfrakq$, hence is in the decomposition group of $mathfrakq$. Now as you point out, this group is isomorphic to the Galois group of $O_L/mathfrakq$ over $mathbbF_p$, so there is a unique such automorphism that acts as Frobenius.



          Examine the above paragraph and note that nothing depends on the upper field being $L$ -- it could be any abelian extension of $mathbbQ$. In particular, there is a $Frob_p$ automorphism of $K/mathbbQ$. In fact, by the above characterization, this $Frob_p$ is the restriction to $K$ of the $Frob_p$ for $L/mathbbQ$.



          $implies$: Choose the $mathfrakq$ to lie above $mathfrakp_1$. If $Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$, then the $Frob_p$ for $K/mathbbQ$ is the identity automorphism. In particular, $x = Frob_p x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakp_1$ for all $x$ in $O_K$, so $x mapsto x^p$ is the identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$.



          $impliedby$: If $x mapsto x^p$ is the identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$, then the identity automorphism of $K$ has the property that characterizes the $Frob_p$ for $K/mathbbQ$. Thus, this $Frob_p$ is the identity on $K$, so the $Frob_p$ for $L$ is trivial on $O_K$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1258074%2ffrobenius-automorphism-and-cyclotomic-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            I think you're missing the following useful observation: $Frob_p$ is characterized by the property $Frob_p x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakq$ for all $x$ in $O_L$. That $Frob_p$ has this property follows from your definition. To see that it is determined among all automorphisms of $L$ by this property, note that if for some automorphism $sigma$ of $L$ we have $sigma x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakq$, then letting $x$ be in $mathfrakq$, we see that $sigma$ fixes $mathfrakq$, hence is in the decomposition group of $mathfrakq$. Now as you point out, this group is isomorphic to the Galois group of $O_L/mathfrakq$ over $mathbbF_p$, so there is a unique such automorphism that acts as Frobenius.



            Examine the above paragraph and note that nothing depends on the upper field being $L$ -- it could be any abelian extension of $mathbbQ$. In particular, there is a $Frob_p$ automorphism of $K/mathbbQ$. In fact, by the above characterization, this $Frob_p$ is the restriction to $K$ of the $Frob_p$ for $L/mathbbQ$.



            $implies$: Choose the $mathfrakq$ to lie above $mathfrakp_1$. If $Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$, then the $Frob_p$ for $K/mathbbQ$ is the identity automorphism. In particular, $x = Frob_p x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakp_1$ for all $x$ in $O_K$, so $x mapsto x^p$ is the identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$.



            $impliedby$: If $x mapsto x^p$ is the identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$, then the identity automorphism of $K$ has the property that characterizes the $Frob_p$ for $K/mathbbQ$. Thus, this $Frob_p$ is the identity on $K$, so the $Frob_p$ for $L$ is trivial on $O_K$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              I think you're missing the following useful observation: $Frob_p$ is characterized by the property $Frob_p x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakq$ for all $x$ in $O_L$. That $Frob_p$ has this property follows from your definition. To see that it is determined among all automorphisms of $L$ by this property, note that if for some automorphism $sigma$ of $L$ we have $sigma x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakq$, then letting $x$ be in $mathfrakq$, we see that $sigma$ fixes $mathfrakq$, hence is in the decomposition group of $mathfrakq$. Now as you point out, this group is isomorphic to the Galois group of $O_L/mathfrakq$ over $mathbbF_p$, so there is a unique such automorphism that acts as Frobenius.



              Examine the above paragraph and note that nothing depends on the upper field being $L$ -- it could be any abelian extension of $mathbbQ$. In particular, there is a $Frob_p$ automorphism of $K/mathbbQ$. In fact, by the above characterization, this $Frob_p$ is the restriction to $K$ of the $Frob_p$ for $L/mathbbQ$.



              $implies$: Choose the $mathfrakq$ to lie above $mathfrakp_1$. If $Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$, then the $Frob_p$ for $K/mathbbQ$ is the identity automorphism. In particular, $x = Frob_p x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakp_1$ for all $x$ in $O_K$, so $x mapsto x^p$ is the identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$.



              $impliedby$: If $x mapsto x^p$ is the identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$, then the identity automorphism of $K$ has the property that characterizes the $Frob_p$ for $K/mathbbQ$. Thus, this $Frob_p$ is the identity on $K$, so the $Frob_p$ for $L$ is trivial on $O_K$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                I think you're missing the following useful observation: $Frob_p$ is characterized by the property $Frob_p x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakq$ for all $x$ in $O_L$. That $Frob_p$ has this property follows from your definition. To see that it is determined among all automorphisms of $L$ by this property, note that if for some automorphism $sigma$ of $L$ we have $sigma x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakq$, then letting $x$ be in $mathfrakq$, we see that $sigma$ fixes $mathfrakq$, hence is in the decomposition group of $mathfrakq$. Now as you point out, this group is isomorphic to the Galois group of $O_L/mathfrakq$ over $mathbbF_p$, so there is a unique such automorphism that acts as Frobenius.



                Examine the above paragraph and note that nothing depends on the upper field being $L$ -- it could be any abelian extension of $mathbbQ$. In particular, there is a $Frob_p$ automorphism of $K/mathbbQ$. In fact, by the above characterization, this $Frob_p$ is the restriction to $K$ of the $Frob_p$ for $L/mathbbQ$.



                $implies$: Choose the $mathfrakq$ to lie above $mathfrakp_1$. If $Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$, then the $Frob_p$ for $K/mathbbQ$ is the identity automorphism. In particular, $x = Frob_p x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakp_1$ for all $x$ in $O_K$, so $x mapsto x^p$ is the identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$.



                $impliedby$: If $x mapsto x^p$ is the identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$, then the identity automorphism of $K$ has the property that characterizes the $Frob_p$ for $K/mathbbQ$. Thus, this $Frob_p$ is the identity on $K$, so the $Frob_p$ for $L$ is trivial on $O_K$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I think you're missing the following useful observation: $Frob_p$ is characterized by the property $Frob_p x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakq$ for all $x$ in $O_L$. That $Frob_p$ has this property follows from your definition. To see that it is determined among all automorphisms of $L$ by this property, note that if for some automorphism $sigma$ of $L$ we have $sigma x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakq$, then letting $x$ be in $mathfrakq$, we see that $sigma$ fixes $mathfrakq$, hence is in the decomposition group of $mathfrakq$. Now as you point out, this group is isomorphic to the Galois group of $O_L/mathfrakq$ over $mathbbF_p$, so there is a unique such automorphism that acts as Frobenius.



                Examine the above paragraph and note that nothing depends on the upper field being $L$ -- it could be any abelian extension of $mathbbQ$. In particular, there is a $Frob_p$ automorphism of $K/mathbbQ$. In fact, by the above characterization, this $Frob_p$ is the restriction to $K$ of the $Frob_p$ for $L/mathbbQ$.



                $implies$: Choose the $mathfrakq$ to lie above $mathfrakp_1$. If $Frob_p$ acts trivially on $O_K$, then the $Frob_p$ for $K/mathbbQ$ is the identity automorphism. In particular, $x = Frob_p x equiv x^p pmodmathfrakp_1$ for all $x$ in $O_K$, so $x mapsto x^p$ is the identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$.



                $impliedby$: If $x mapsto x^p$ is the identity on $O_K/mathfrakp_1$, then the identity automorphism of $K$ has the property that characterizes the $Frob_p$ for $K/mathbbQ$. Thus, this $Frob_p$ is the identity on $K$, so the $Frob_p$ for $L$ is trivial on $O_K$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 29 '15 at 23:46









                Barry SmithBarry Smith

                3,4141531




                3,4141531



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1258074%2ffrobenius-automorphism-and-cyclotomic-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                    Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                    Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ