Is there a notation for defining if a function is recursively defined? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Mathematical notation - defining setsNotation for a defining a grid of pointsNotation for “vectorized” functionmathematical notation for defining a variable inside a conditional expressionTechnical question about notation for defining a functionNotation Regarding Not Recursively Defined ElementIs there a standard notation for the following function?Generally accepted notation for referencing function without defining it.Meaning of double arrow $Leftrightarrow$ symbol in signal processing contextNotation for “Defined as proportional to”

What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in ITSV

When was Kai Tak permanently closed to cargo service?

What causes the direction of lightning flashes?

Fantasy story; one type of magic grows in power with use, but the more powerful they are, they more they are drawn to travel to their source

Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?

Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other

What do you call the main part of a joke?

Is grep documentation wrong?

If my PI received research grants from a company to be able to pay my postdoc salary, did I have a potential conflict interest too?

How do pianists reach extremely loud dynamics?

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?

Is there a kind of relay only consumes power when switching?

Circuit to "zoom in" on mV fluctuations of a DC signal?

Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?

Generate an RGB colour grid

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?

What do you call a floor made of glass so you can see through the floor?

Dating a Former Employee

In what way is everyone not a utilitarian

Do square wave exist?



Is there a notation for defining if a function is recursively defined?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Mathematical notation - defining setsNotation for a defining a grid of pointsNotation for “vectorized” functionmathematical notation for defining a variable inside a conditional expressionTechnical question about notation for defining a functionNotation Regarding Not Recursively Defined ElementIs there a standard notation for the following function?Generally accepted notation for referencing function without defining it.Meaning of double arrow $Leftrightarrow$ symbol in signal processing contextNotation for “Defined as proportional to”










1












$begingroup$


Background: I'm working on a paper on high level synthesis, a method which combines the use of programming with digital circuit design. One of the methods I want to explain is called loop unrolling which makes use of concurrency to speed up execution, by duplicating the processing elements.



Unrolling can only be done on any function iff there is no internal relation between iterations, an example of a function with this property would be vector multiplication. My best guess would be something along the lines of $ g triangleq f in ?? $.



Is there a standard or good notation to describe the set of functions which do not contain a recursive term?



Edit: I originally accepted the answer as I could see that there was a slight mismatch between the question as a whole and the formulation of the question in the final paragraph. The previously accepted answer did answer the question as written, although not as intended. I'll clear it up a bit more, apologies for the mess.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As far as I know, there's no notation for this, because "what terms a function's definition has" are not inherently part of the function. You can define many functions either with or without recursion, and they're the same function either way -- so this isn't really a meaningful notion in mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    Apr 1 at 17:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I do want to point out that it is a meaningful notion in Computer Science because if a function can only be calculated recursively, it cannot be parallelized, which generally means computational complexity increases massively. Calculating Fibonacci using the $F_n=F_n-1+F_n-2$ definition runs in $O(left(frac43right)^n)$ time, while dynamic programming runs in $O(n)$ time (which is slightly recursive), while Binet's formula/matrix exponentiation can run in $O(log n)$ time using a completely nonrecursive formula.
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 17:40
















1












$begingroup$


Background: I'm working on a paper on high level synthesis, a method which combines the use of programming with digital circuit design. One of the methods I want to explain is called loop unrolling which makes use of concurrency to speed up execution, by duplicating the processing elements.



Unrolling can only be done on any function iff there is no internal relation between iterations, an example of a function with this property would be vector multiplication. My best guess would be something along the lines of $ g triangleq f in ?? $.



Is there a standard or good notation to describe the set of functions which do not contain a recursive term?



Edit: I originally accepted the answer as I could see that there was a slight mismatch between the question as a whole and the formulation of the question in the final paragraph. The previously accepted answer did answer the question as written, although not as intended. I'll clear it up a bit more, apologies for the mess.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As far as I know, there's no notation for this, because "what terms a function's definition has" are not inherently part of the function. You can define many functions either with or without recursion, and they're the same function either way -- so this isn't really a meaningful notion in mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    Apr 1 at 17:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I do want to point out that it is a meaningful notion in Computer Science because if a function can only be calculated recursively, it cannot be parallelized, which generally means computational complexity increases massively. Calculating Fibonacci using the $F_n=F_n-1+F_n-2$ definition runs in $O(left(frac43right)^n)$ time, while dynamic programming runs in $O(n)$ time (which is slightly recursive), while Binet's formula/matrix exponentiation can run in $O(log n)$ time using a completely nonrecursive formula.
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 17:40














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Background: I'm working on a paper on high level synthesis, a method which combines the use of programming with digital circuit design. One of the methods I want to explain is called loop unrolling which makes use of concurrency to speed up execution, by duplicating the processing elements.



Unrolling can only be done on any function iff there is no internal relation between iterations, an example of a function with this property would be vector multiplication. My best guess would be something along the lines of $ g triangleq f in ?? $.



Is there a standard or good notation to describe the set of functions which do not contain a recursive term?



Edit: I originally accepted the answer as I could see that there was a slight mismatch between the question as a whole and the formulation of the question in the final paragraph. The previously accepted answer did answer the question as written, although not as intended. I'll clear it up a bit more, apologies for the mess.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Background: I'm working on a paper on high level synthesis, a method which combines the use of programming with digital circuit design. One of the methods I want to explain is called loop unrolling which makes use of concurrency to speed up execution, by duplicating the processing elements.



Unrolling can only be done on any function iff there is no internal relation between iterations, an example of a function with this property would be vector multiplication. My best guess would be something along the lines of $ g triangleq f in ?? $.



Is there a standard or good notation to describe the set of functions which do not contain a recursive term?



Edit: I originally accepted the answer as I could see that there was a slight mismatch between the question as a whole and the formulation of the question in the final paragraph. The previously accepted answer did answer the question as written, although not as intended. I'll clear it up a bit more, apologies for the mess.







notation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 3 at 6:10







Ólafur Dagur Skúlason

















asked Apr 1 at 13:53









Ólafur Dagur SkúlasonÓlafur Dagur Skúlason

83




83







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As far as I know, there's no notation for this, because "what terms a function's definition has" are not inherently part of the function. You can define many functions either with or without recursion, and they're the same function either way -- so this isn't really a meaningful notion in mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    Apr 1 at 17:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I do want to point out that it is a meaningful notion in Computer Science because if a function can only be calculated recursively, it cannot be parallelized, which generally means computational complexity increases massively. Calculating Fibonacci using the $F_n=F_n-1+F_n-2$ definition runs in $O(left(frac43right)^n)$ time, while dynamic programming runs in $O(n)$ time (which is slightly recursive), while Binet's formula/matrix exponentiation can run in $O(log n)$ time using a completely nonrecursive formula.
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 17:40













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As far as I know, there's no notation for this, because "what terms a function's definition has" are not inherently part of the function. You can define many functions either with or without recursion, and they're the same function either way -- so this isn't really a meaningful notion in mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    Apr 1 at 17:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I do want to point out that it is a meaningful notion in Computer Science because if a function can only be calculated recursively, it cannot be parallelized, which generally means computational complexity increases massively. Calculating Fibonacci using the $F_n=F_n-1+F_n-2$ definition runs in $O(left(frac43right)^n)$ time, while dynamic programming runs in $O(n)$ time (which is slightly recursive), while Binet's formula/matrix exponentiation can run in $O(log n)$ time using a completely nonrecursive formula.
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 17:40








2




2




$begingroup$
As far as I know, there's no notation for this, because "what terms a function's definition has" are not inherently part of the function. You can define many functions either with or without recursion, and they're the same function either way -- so this isn't really a meaningful notion in mathematics.
$endgroup$
– Deusovi
Apr 1 at 17:33




$begingroup$
As far as I know, there's no notation for this, because "what terms a function's definition has" are not inherently part of the function. You can define many functions either with or without recursion, and they're the same function either way -- so this isn't really a meaningful notion in mathematics.
$endgroup$
– Deusovi
Apr 1 at 17:33




1




1




$begingroup$
I do want to point out that it is a meaningful notion in Computer Science because if a function can only be calculated recursively, it cannot be parallelized, which generally means computational complexity increases massively. Calculating Fibonacci using the $F_n=F_n-1+F_n-2$ definition runs in $O(left(frac43right)^n)$ time, while dynamic programming runs in $O(n)$ time (which is slightly recursive), while Binet's formula/matrix exponentiation can run in $O(log n)$ time using a completely nonrecursive formula.
$endgroup$
– AlgorithmsX
Apr 1 at 17:40





$begingroup$
I do want to point out that it is a meaningful notion in Computer Science because if a function can only be calculated recursively, it cannot be parallelized, which generally means computational complexity increases massively. Calculating Fibonacci using the $F_n=F_n-1+F_n-2$ definition runs in $O(left(frac43right)^n)$ time, while dynamic programming runs in $O(n)$ time (which is slightly recursive), while Binet's formula/matrix exponentiation can run in $O(log n)$ time using a completely nonrecursive formula.
$endgroup$
– AlgorithmsX
Apr 1 at 17:40











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

As far as I know, there is no specific notation.



You might write something like



$$f[N]:=alpha(a,b,c,cdots)=alpha(V)$$



where $alpha$ denotes the expression (or more generally the algorithm) that evaluates the value to be assigned to $f[N]$, and $V=a,b,c,cdots$ is the set of variables that appear explicitly in $alpha$.



Then the absence of a dependency is expressed by



$$f[N-n]notin V.$$




On second thoughts, though your notation seems to imply an array, this is unlikely as you say $forall n$. But then, saying that the value of $f_N$ (at iteration $N$) depends on the value $f_N-n$ (at iteration $N-n$) only makes sense if the process has enough memory (variables) to realize such a dependency. This is a much more complicated situation.



An example would be a running sum on, say, three elements,



i= 0
a= b= c= s= 0
while True:
a= b; b= c; c= K[i]
i= i + 1
s= s - a + c





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your second thoughts are pretty much what I want to describe. As I mentioned in the question vector operations are common applications for this technique as although each step of the procedure uses the original vectors, by splitting them on the index and treating each indexed value separately. Using dot product as an example, $sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition can be done concurrently.
    $endgroup$
    – Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
    Apr 3 at 6:17










  • $begingroup$
    I was too late to edit: Using dot product as an example, $ c = sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition does not contain a term for $ c_N-n $ and fulfills the requirement. I'm going to accept the answer as I accept that the requirements do not properly apply in mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
    Apr 3 at 6:31










  • $begingroup$
    @ÓlafurDagurSkúlason: the case of the dot product is exactly my first thought, not at all the second. In your question there is a large ambiguity between the indexes of an array and the iteration number.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 3 at 9:09



















-1












$begingroup$

Edit



Since I am unable to delete this answer because it has been accepted, I'm going to say that there appears to be no standard way to write what you want, as all functions of the natural numbers (and likely other sets of numbers) can be written using a recursive defintion. You might as well just write it out in English or define the class of functions that can be calculated without depending on previous terms in the sequence in the paper.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm concerned that this may not answer the question. A function from the naturals could be given a self-referential definition (like the standard recurrence for the Fibonacci numbers) or not (like Binet's formula for the Fibonacci numbers), so I don't think your proposal can distinguish the sort of thing the OP was asking about.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark S.
    Apr 1 at 17:07










  • $begingroup$
    I see that now. Do you have any suggestions? I cannot find anything, as you can define everything as a recursive function. Is there a complexity class that contains nonrecursive computable problems?
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 17:26











  • $begingroup$
    The question is not if the function can be computed at all. It is about data dependencies in the computation algorithm.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 1 at 17:53










  • $begingroup$
    @YvesDaoust I understand what the question is about, but I cannot imagine that he would want a noncomputable function for his paper.
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 18:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlgorithmsX: the question has nothing to do with computability.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 1 at 18:11











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170633%2fis-there-a-notation-for-defining-if-a-function-is-recursively-defined%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

As far as I know, there is no specific notation.



You might write something like



$$f[N]:=alpha(a,b,c,cdots)=alpha(V)$$



where $alpha$ denotes the expression (or more generally the algorithm) that evaluates the value to be assigned to $f[N]$, and $V=a,b,c,cdots$ is the set of variables that appear explicitly in $alpha$.



Then the absence of a dependency is expressed by



$$f[N-n]notin V.$$




On second thoughts, though your notation seems to imply an array, this is unlikely as you say $forall n$. But then, saying that the value of $f_N$ (at iteration $N$) depends on the value $f_N-n$ (at iteration $N-n$) only makes sense if the process has enough memory (variables) to realize such a dependency. This is a much more complicated situation.



An example would be a running sum on, say, three elements,



i= 0
a= b= c= s= 0
while True:
a= b; b= c; c= K[i]
i= i + 1
s= s - a + c





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your second thoughts are pretty much what I want to describe. As I mentioned in the question vector operations are common applications for this technique as although each step of the procedure uses the original vectors, by splitting them on the index and treating each indexed value separately. Using dot product as an example, $sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition can be done concurrently.
    $endgroup$
    – Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
    Apr 3 at 6:17










  • $begingroup$
    I was too late to edit: Using dot product as an example, $ c = sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition does not contain a term for $ c_N-n $ and fulfills the requirement. I'm going to accept the answer as I accept that the requirements do not properly apply in mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
    Apr 3 at 6:31










  • $begingroup$
    @ÓlafurDagurSkúlason: the case of the dot product is exactly my first thought, not at all the second. In your question there is a large ambiguity between the indexes of an array and the iteration number.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 3 at 9:09
















2












$begingroup$

As far as I know, there is no specific notation.



You might write something like



$$f[N]:=alpha(a,b,c,cdots)=alpha(V)$$



where $alpha$ denotes the expression (or more generally the algorithm) that evaluates the value to be assigned to $f[N]$, and $V=a,b,c,cdots$ is the set of variables that appear explicitly in $alpha$.



Then the absence of a dependency is expressed by



$$f[N-n]notin V.$$




On second thoughts, though your notation seems to imply an array, this is unlikely as you say $forall n$. But then, saying that the value of $f_N$ (at iteration $N$) depends on the value $f_N-n$ (at iteration $N-n$) only makes sense if the process has enough memory (variables) to realize such a dependency. This is a much more complicated situation.



An example would be a running sum on, say, three elements,



i= 0
a= b= c= s= 0
while True:
a= b; b= c; c= K[i]
i= i + 1
s= s - a + c





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your second thoughts are pretty much what I want to describe. As I mentioned in the question vector operations are common applications for this technique as although each step of the procedure uses the original vectors, by splitting them on the index and treating each indexed value separately. Using dot product as an example, $sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition can be done concurrently.
    $endgroup$
    – Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
    Apr 3 at 6:17










  • $begingroup$
    I was too late to edit: Using dot product as an example, $ c = sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition does not contain a term for $ c_N-n $ and fulfills the requirement. I'm going to accept the answer as I accept that the requirements do not properly apply in mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
    Apr 3 at 6:31










  • $begingroup$
    @ÓlafurDagurSkúlason: the case of the dot product is exactly my first thought, not at all the second. In your question there is a large ambiguity between the indexes of an array and the iteration number.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 3 at 9:09














2












2








2





$begingroup$

As far as I know, there is no specific notation.



You might write something like



$$f[N]:=alpha(a,b,c,cdots)=alpha(V)$$



where $alpha$ denotes the expression (or more generally the algorithm) that evaluates the value to be assigned to $f[N]$, and $V=a,b,c,cdots$ is the set of variables that appear explicitly in $alpha$.



Then the absence of a dependency is expressed by



$$f[N-n]notin V.$$




On second thoughts, though your notation seems to imply an array, this is unlikely as you say $forall n$. But then, saying that the value of $f_N$ (at iteration $N$) depends on the value $f_N-n$ (at iteration $N-n$) only makes sense if the process has enough memory (variables) to realize such a dependency. This is a much more complicated situation.



An example would be a running sum on, say, three elements,



i= 0
a= b= c= s= 0
while True:
a= b; b= c; c= K[i]
i= i + 1
s= s - a + c





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



As far as I know, there is no specific notation.



You might write something like



$$f[N]:=alpha(a,b,c,cdots)=alpha(V)$$



where $alpha$ denotes the expression (or more generally the algorithm) that evaluates the value to be assigned to $f[N]$, and $V=a,b,c,cdots$ is the set of variables that appear explicitly in $alpha$.



Then the absence of a dependency is expressed by



$$f[N-n]notin V.$$




On second thoughts, though your notation seems to imply an array, this is unlikely as you say $forall n$. But then, saying that the value of $f_N$ (at iteration $N$) depends on the value $f_N-n$ (at iteration $N-n$) only makes sense if the process has enough memory (variables) to realize such a dependency. This is a much more complicated situation.



An example would be a running sum on, say, three elements,



i= 0
a= b= c= s= 0
while True:
a= b; b= c; c= K[i]
i= i + 1
s= s - a + c






share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Apr 1 at 18:45

























answered Apr 1 at 18:29









Yves DaoustYves Daoust

133k676232




133k676232











  • $begingroup$
    Your second thoughts are pretty much what I want to describe. As I mentioned in the question vector operations are common applications for this technique as although each step of the procedure uses the original vectors, by splitting them on the index and treating each indexed value separately. Using dot product as an example, $sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition can be done concurrently.
    $endgroup$
    – Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
    Apr 3 at 6:17










  • $begingroup$
    I was too late to edit: Using dot product as an example, $ c = sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition does not contain a term for $ c_N-n $ and fulfills the requirement. I'm going to accept the answer as I accept that the requirements do not properly apply in mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
    Apr 3 at 6:31










  • $begingroup$
    @ÓlafurDagurSkúlason: the case of the dot product is exactly my first thought, not at all the second. In your question there is a large ambiguity between the indexes of an array and the iteration number.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 3 at 9:09

















  • $begingroup$
    Your second thoughts are pretty much what I want to describe. As I mentioned in the question vector operations are common applications for this technique as although each step of the procedure uses the original vectors, by splitting them on the index and treating each indexed value separately. Using dot product as an example, $sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition can be done concurrently.
    $endgroup$
    – Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
    Apr 3 at 6:17










  • $begingroup$
    I was too late to edit: Using dot product as an example, $ c = sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition does not contain a term for $ c_N-n $ and fulfills the requirement. I'm going to accept the answer as I accept that the requirements do not properly apply in mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
    Apr 3 at 6:31










  • $begingroup$
    @ÓlafurDagurSkúlason: the case of the dot product is exactly my first thought, not at all the second. In your question there is a large ambiguity between the indexes of an array and the iteration number.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 3 at 9:09
















$begingroup$
Your second thoughts are pretty much what I want to describe. As I mentioned in the question vector operations are common applications for this technique as although each step of the procedure uses the original vectors, by splitting them on the index and treating each indexed value separately. Using dot product as an example, $sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition can be done concurrently.
$endgroup$
– Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
Apr 3 at 6:17




$begingroup$
Your second thoughts are pretty much what I want to describe. As I mentioned in the question vector operations are common applications for this technique as although each step of the procedure uses the original vectors, by splitting them on the index and treating each indexed value separately. Using dot product as an example, $sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition can be done concurrently.
$endgroup$
– Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
Apr 3 at 6:17












$begingroup$
I was too late to edit: Using dot product as an example, $ c = sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition does not contain a term for $ c_N-n $ and fulfills the requirement. I'm going to accept the answer as I accept that the requirements do not properly apply in mathematics.
$endgroup$
– Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
Apr 3 at 6:31




$begingroup$
I was too late to edit: Using dot product as an example, $ c = sum_n=0^N (a_n * b_n)$ the inner term of the definition does not contain a term for $ c_N-n $ and fulfills the requirement. I'm going to accept the answer as I accept that the requirements do not properly apply in mathematics.
$endgroup$
– Ólafur Dagur Skúlason
Apr 3 at 6:31












$begingroup$
@ÓlafurDagurSkúlason: the case of the dot product is exactly my first thought, not at all the second. In your question there is a large ambiguity between the indexes of an array and the iteration number.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 3 at 9:09





$begingroup$
@ÓlafurDagurSkúlason: the case of the dot product is exactly my first thought, not at all the second. In your question there is a large ambiguity between the indexes of an array and the iteration number.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 3 at 9:09












-1












$begingroup$

Edit



Since I am unable to delete this answer because it has been accepted, I'm going to say that there appears to be no standard way to write what you want, as all functions of the natural numbers (and likely other sets of numbers) can be written using a recursive defintion. You might as well just write it out in English or define the class of functions that can be calculated without depending on previous terms in the sequence in the paper.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm concerned that this may not answer the question. A function from the naturals could be given a self-referential definition (like the standard recurrence for the Fibonacci numbers) or not (like Binet's formula for the Fibonacci numbers), so I don't think your proposal can distinguish the sort of thing the OP was asking about.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark S.
    Apr 1 at 17:07










  • $begingroup$
    I see that now. Do you have any suggestions? I cannot find anything, as you can define everything as a recursive function. Is there a complexity class that contains nonrecursive computable problems?
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 17:26











  • $begingroup$
    The question is not if the function can be computed at all. It is about data dependencies in the computation algorithm.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 1 at 17:53










  • $begingroup$
    @YvesDaoust I understand what the question is about, but I cannot imagine that he would want a noncomputable function for his paper.
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 18:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlgorithmsX: the question has nothing to do with computability.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 1 at 18:11















-1












$begingroup$

Edit



Since I am unable to delete this answer because it has been accepted, I'm going to say that there appears to be no standard way to write what you want, as all functions of the natural numbers (and likely other sets of numbers) can be written using a recursive defintion. You might as well just write it out in English or define the class of functions that can be calculated without depending on previous terms in the sequence in the paper.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm concerned that this may not answer the question. A function from the naturals could be given a self-referential definition (like the standard recurrence for the Fibonacci numbers) or not (like Binet's formula for the Fibonacci numbers), so I don't think your proposal can distinguish the sort of thing the OP was asking about.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark S.
    Apr 1 at 17:07










  • $begingroup$
    I see that now. Do you have any suggestions? I cannot find anything, as you can define everything as a recursive function. Is there a complexity class that contains nonrecursive computable problems?
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 17:26











  • $begingroup$
    The question is not if the function can be computed at all. It is about data dependencies in the computation algorithm.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 1 at 17:53










  • $begingroup$
    @YvesDaoust I understand what the question is about, but I cannot imagine that he would want a noncomputable function for his paper.
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 18:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlgorithmsX: the question has nothing to do with computability.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 1 at 18:11













-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$

Edit



Since I am unable to delete this answer because it has been accepted, I'm going to say that there appears to be no standard way to write what you want, as all functions of the natural numbers (and likely other sets of numbers) can be written using a recursive defintion. You might as well just write it out in English or define the class of functions that can be calculated without depending on previous terms in the sequence in the paper.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Edit



Since I am unable to delete this answer because it has been accepted, I'm going to say that there appears to be no standard way to write what you want, as all functions of the natural numbers (and likely other sets of numbers) can be written using a recursive defintion. You might as well just write it out in English or define the class of functions that can be calculated without depending on previous terms in the sequence in the paper.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Apr 1 at 18:13

























answered Apr 1 at 14:07









AlgorithmsXAlgorithmsX

4,1451828




4,1451828







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm concerned that this may not answer the question. A function from the naturals could be given a self-referential definition (like the standard recurrence for the Fibonacci numbers) or not (like Binet's formula for the Fibonacci numbers), so I don't think your proposal can distinguish the sort of thing the OP was asking about.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark S.
    Apr 1 at 17:07










  • $begingroup$
    I see that now. Do you have any suggestions? I cannot find anything, as you can define everything as a recursive function. Is there a complexity class that contains nonrecursive computable problems?
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 17:26











  • $begingroup$
    The question is not if the function can be computed at all. It is about data dependencies in the computation algorithm.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 1 at 17:53










  • $begingroup$
    @YvesDaoust I understand what the question is about, but I cannot imagine that he would want a noncomputable function for his paper.
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 18:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlgorithmsX: the question has nothing to do with computability.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 1 at 18:11












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm concerned that this may not answer the question. A function from the naturals could be given a self-referential definition (like the standard recurrence for the Fibonacci numbers) or not (like Binet's formula for the Fibonacci numbers), so I don't think your proposal can distinguish the sort of thing the OP was asking about.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark S.
    Apr 1 at 17:07










  • $begingroup$
    I see that now. Do you have any suggestions? I cannot find anything, as you can define everything as a recursive function. Is there a complexity class that contains nonrecursive computable problems?
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 17:26











  • $begingroup$
    The question is not if the function can be computed at all. It is about data dependencies in the computation algorithm.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 1 at 17:53










  • $begingroup$
    @YvesDaoust I understand what the question is about, but I cannot imagine that he would want a noncomputable function for his paper.
    $endgroup$
    – AlgorithmsX
    Apr 1 at 18:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlgorithmsX: the question has nothing to do with computability.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Apr 1 at 18:11







2




2




$begingroup$
I'm concerned that this may not answer the question. A function from the naturals could be given a self-referential definition (like the standard recurrence for the Fibonacci numbers) or not (like Binet's formula for the Fibonacci numbers), so I don't think your proposal can distinguish the sort of thing the OP was asking about.
$endgroup$
– Mark S.
Apr 1 at 17:07




$begingroup$
I'm concerned that this may not answer the question. A function from the naturals could be given a self-referential definition (like the standard recurrence for the Fibonacci numbers) or not (like Binet's formula for the Fibonacci numbers), so I don't think your proposal can distinguish the sort of thing the OP was asking about.
$endgroup$
– Mark S.
Apr 1 at 17:07












$begingroup$
I see that now. Do you have any suggestions? I cannot find anything, as you can define everything as a recursive function. Is there a complexity class that contains nonrecursive computable problems?
$endgroup$
– AlgorithmsX
Apr 1 at 17:26





$begingroup$
I see that now. Do you have any suggestions? I cannot find anything, as you can define everything as a recursive function. Is there a complexity class that contains nonrecursive computable problems?
$endgroup$
– AlgorithmsX
Apr 1 at 17:26













$begingroup$
The question is not if the function can be computed at all. It is about data dependencies in the computation algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 1 at 17:53




$begingroup$
The question is not if the function can be computed at all. It is about data dependencies in the computation algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 1 at 17:53












$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust I understand what the question is about, but I cannot imagine that he would want a noncomputable function for his paper.
$endgroup$
– AlgorithmsX
Apr 1 at 18:04




$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust I understand what the question is about, but I cannot imagine that he would want a noncomputable function for his paper.
$endgroup$
– AlgorithmsX
Apr 1 at 18:04




1




1




$begingroup$
@AlgorithmsX: the question has nothing to do with computability.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 1 at 18:11




$begingroup$
@AlgorithmsX: the question has nothing to do with computability.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 1 at 18:11

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170633%2fis-there-a-notation-for-defining-if-a-function-is-recursively-defined%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O

Serbia Índice Etimología Historia Geografía Entorno natural División administrativa Política Demografía Economía Cultura Deportes Véase también Notas Referencias Bibliografía Enlaces externos Menú de navegación44°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.46666666666744°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.466666666667U.S. Department of Commerce (2015)«Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2018»Kosovo-Metohija.Neutralna Srbija u NATO okruzenju.The SerbsTheories on the Origin of the Serbs.Serbia.Earls: Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases.Egeo y Balcanes.Kalemegdan.Southern Pannonia during the age of the Great Migrations.Culture in Serbia.History.The Serbian Origin of the Montenegrins.Nemanjics' period (1186-1353).Stefan Uros (1355-1371).Serbian medieval history.Habsburg–Ottoman Wars (1525–1718).The Ottoman Empire, 1700-1922.The First Serbian Uprising.Miloš, prince of Serbia.3. Bosnia-Hercegovina and the Congress of Berlin.The Balkan Wars and the Partition of Macedonia.The Falcon and the Eagle: Montenegro and Austria-Hungary, 1908-1914.Typhus fever on the eastern front in World War I.Anniversary of WWI battle marked in Serbia.La derrota austriaca en los Balcanes. Fin del Imperio Austro-Húngaro.Imperio austriaco y Reino de Hungría.Los tiempos modernos: del capitalismo a la globalización, siglos XVII al XXI.The period of Croatia within ex-Yugoslavia.Yugoslavia: Much in a Name.Las dictaduras europeas.Croacia: mito y realidad."Crods ask arms".Prólogo a la invasión.La campaña de los Balcanes.La resistencia en Yugoslavia.Jasenovac Research Institute.Día en memoria de las víctimas del genocidio en la Segunda Guerra Mundial.El infierno estuvo en Jasenovac.Croacia empieza a «desenterrar» a sus muertos de Jasenovac.World fascism: a historical encyclopedia, Volumen 1.Tito. Josip Broz.El nuevo orden y la resistencia.La conquista del poder.Algunos aspectos de la economía yugoslava a mediados de 1962.Albania-Kosovo crisis.De Kosovo a Kosova: una visión demográfica.La crisis de la economía yugoslava y la política de "estabilización".Milosevic: el poder de un absolutista."Serbia under Milošević: politics in the 1990s"Milosevic cavó en Kosovo la tumba de la antigua Yugoslavia.La ONU exculpa a Serbia de genocidio en la guerra de Bosnia.Slobodan Milosevic, el burócrata que supo usar el odio.Es la fuerza contra el sufrimiento de muchos inocentes.Matanza de civiles al bombardear la OTAN un puente mientras pasaba un tren.Las consecuencias negativas de los bombardeos de Yugoslavia se sentirán aún durante largo tiempo.Kostunica advierte que la misión de Europa en Kosovo es ilegal.Las 24 horas más largas en la vida de Slobodan Milosevic.Serbia declara la guerra a la mafia por matar a Djindjic.Tadic presentará "quizás en diciembre" la solicitud de entrada en la UE.Montenegro declara su independencia de Serbia.Serbia se declara estado soberano tras separación de Montenegro.«Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion)»Mladic pasa por el médico antes de la audiencia para extraditarloDatos de Serbia y Kosovo.The Carpathian Mountains.Position, Relief, Climate.Transport.Finding birds in Serbia.U Srbiji do 2010. godine 10% teritorije nacionalni parkovi.Geography.Serbia: Climate.Variability of Climate In Serbia In The Second Half of The 20thc Entury.BASIC CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE TERRITORY OF SERBIA.Fauna y flora: Serbia.Serbia and Montenegro.Información general sobre Serbia.Republic of Serbia Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA).Serbia recycling 15% of waste.Reform process of the Serbian energy sector.20-MW Wind Project Being Developed in Serbia.Las Naciones Unidas. Paz para Kosovo.Aniversario sin fiesta.Population by national or ethnic groups by Census 2002.Article 7. Coat of arms, flag and national anthem.Serbia, flag of.Historia.«Serbia and Montenegro in Pictures»Serbia.Serbia aprueba su nueva Constitución con un apoyo de más del 50%.Serbia. Population.«El nacionalista Nikolic gana las elecciones presidenciales en Serbia»El europeísta Borís Tadic gana la segunda vuelta de las presidenciales serbias.Aleksandar Vucic, de ultranacionalista serbio a fervoroso europeístaKostunica condena la declaración del "falso estado" de Kosovo.Comienza el debate sobre la independencia de Kosovo en el TIJ.La Corte Internacional de Justicia dice que Kosovo no violó el derecho internacional al declarar su independenciaKosovo: Enviado de la ONU advierte tensiones y fragilidad.«Bruselas recomienda negociar la adhesión de Serbia tras el acuerdo sobre Kosovo»Monografía de Serbia.Bez smanjivanja Vojske Srbije.Military statistics Serbia and Montenegro.Šutanovac: Vojni budžet za 2009. godinu 70 milijardi dinara.Serbia-Montenegro shortens obligatory military service to six months.No hay justicia para las víctimas de los bombardeos de la OTAN.Zapatero reitera la negativa de España a reconocer la independencia de Kosovo.Anniversary of the signing of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement.Detenido en Serbia Radovan Karadzic, el criminal de guerra más buscado de Europa."Serbia presentará su candidatura de acceso a la UE antes de fin de año".Serbia solicita la adhesión a la UE.Detenido el exgeneral serbobosnio Ratko Mladic, principal acusado del genocidio en los Balcanes«Lista de todos los Estados Miembros de las Naciones Unidas que son parte o signatarios en los diversos instrumentos de derechos humanos de las Naciones Unidas»versión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre la Eliminación de todas las Formas de Discriminación contra la MujerConvención contra la tortura y otros tratos o penas crueles, inhumanos o degradantesversión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con DiscapacidadEl ACNUR recibe con beneplácito el envío de tropas de la OTAN a Kosovo y se prepara ante una posible llegada de refugiados a Serbia.Kosovo.- El jefe de la Minuk denuncia que los serbios boicotearon las legislativas por 'presiones'.Bosnia and Herzegovina. Population.Datos básicos de Montenegro, historia y evolución política.Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa global de fecundidad (por 1000 habitantes).Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa bruta de mortalidad (por 1000 habitantes).Population.Falleció el patriarca de la Iglesia Ortodoxa serbia.Atacan en Kosovo autobuses con peregrinos tras la investidura del patriarca serbio IrinejSerbian in Hungary.Tasas de cambio."Kosovo es de todos sus ciudadanos".Report for Serbia.Country groups by income.GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP) OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA 1997–2007.Economic Trends in the Republic of Serbia 2006.National Accounts Statitics.Саопштења за јавност.GDP per inhabitant varied by one to six across the EU27 Member States.Un pacto de estabilidad para Serbia.Unemployment rate rises in Serbia.Serbia, Belarus agree free trade to woo investors.Serbia, Turkey call investors to Serbia.Success Stories.U.S. Private Investment in Serbia and Montenegro.Positive trend.Banks in Serbia.La Cámara de Comercio acompaña a empresas madrileñas a Serbia y Croacia.Serbia Industries.Energy and mining.Agriculture.Late crops, fruit and grapes output, 2008.Rebranding Serbia: A Hobby Shortly to Become a Full-Time Job.Final data on livestock statistics, 2008.Serbian cell-phone users.U Srbiji sve više računara.Телекомуникације.U Srbiji 27 odsto gradjana koristi Internet.Serbia and Montenegro.Тренд гледаности програма РТС-а у 2008. и 2009.години.Serbian railways.General Terms.El mercado del transporte aéreo en Serbia.Statistics.Vehículos de motor registrados.Planes ambiciosos para el transporte fluvial.Turismo.Turistički promet u Republici Srbiji u periodu januar-novembar 2007. godine.Your Guide to Culture.Novi Sad - city of culture.Nis - european crossroads.Serbia. Properties inscribed on the World Heritage List .Stari Ras and Sopoćani.Studenica Monastery.Medieval Monuments in Kosovo.Gamzigrad-Romuliana, Palace of Galerius.Skiing and snowboarding in Kopaonik.Tara.New7Wonders of Nature Finalists.Pilgrimage of Saint Sava.Exit Festival: Best european festival.Banje u Srbiji.«The Encyclopedia of world history»Culture.Centenario del arte serbio.«Djordje Andrejevic Kun: el único pintor de los brigadistas yugoslavos de la guerra civil española»About the museum.The collections.Miroslav Gospel – Manuscript from 1180.Historicity in the Serbo-Croatian Heroic Epic.Culture and Sport.Conversación con el rector del Seminario San Sava.'Reina Margot' funde drama, historia y gesto con música de Goran Bregovic.Serbia gana Eurovisión y España decepciona de nuevo con un vigésimo puesto.Home.Story.Emir Kusturica.Tercer oro para Paskaljevic.Nikola Tesla Year.Home.Tesla, un genio tomado por loco.Aniversario de la muerte de Nikola Tesla.El Museo Nikola Tesla en Belgrado.El inventor del mundo actual.República de Serbia.University of Belgrade official statistics.University of Novi Sad.University of Kragujevac.University of Nis.Comida. Cocina serbia.Cooking.Montenegro se convertirá en el miembro 204 del movimiento olímpico.España, campeona de Europa de baloncesto.El Partizan de Belgrado se corona campeón por octava vez consecutiva.Serbia se clasifica para el Mundial de 2010 de Sudáfrica.Serbia Name Squad For Northern Ireland And South Korea Tests.Fútbol.- El Partizán de Belgrado se proclama campeón de la Liga serbia.Clasificacion final Mundial de balonmano Croacia 2009.Serbia vence a España y se consagra campeón mundial de waterpolo.Novak Djokovic no convence pero gana en Australia.Gana Ana Ivanovic el Roland Garros.Serena Williams gana el US Open por tercera vez.Biography.Bradt Travel Guide SerbiaThe Encyclopedia of World War IGobierno de SerbiaPortal del Gobierno de SerbiaPresidencia de SerbiaAsamblea Nacional SerbiaMinisterio de Asuntos exteriores de SerbiaBanco Nacional de SerbiaAgencia Serbia para la Promoción de la Inversión y la ExportaciónOficina de Estadísticas de SerbiaCIA. Factbook 2008Organización nacional de turismo de SerbiaDiscover SerbiaConoce SerbiaNoticias de SerbiaSerbiaWorldCat1512028760000 0000 9526 67094054598-2n8519591900570825ge1309191004530741010url17413117006669D055771Serbia