How to construct the matrix representation of a bilinear transformation? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Matrix representation of a linear transformation between vector spacesMatrix representation of linear transformationIs there any notation for a matrix representation of a bilinear form?Possible definition of the matrix representation of a linear transformation with respect to given basesFinding the inverse of linear transformation using matrixHow to find the linear transformation associated with a given matrix?Matrix of Linear Transformation $T(X)=XA-AX$ for a given $A$Uniqueness of bilinear transformation $Etimes Fto G$ vector spacesMatrix Representation of Linear Transformation from R2x2 to R3Standard matrix of a transformation, matrix representation

Why didn't Eitri join the fight?

Does classifying an integer as a discrete log require it be part of a multiplicative group?

How do pianists reach extremely loud dynamics?

Irreducible of finite Krull dimension implies quasi-compact?

Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation

Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?

Why are both D and D# fitting into my E minor key?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

What do you call a floor made of glass so you can see through the floor?

Is it cost-effective to upgrade an old-ish Giant Escape R3 commuter bike with entry-level branded parts (wheels, drivetrain)?

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?

First console to have temporary backward compatibility

What do you call the main part of a joke?

What is the longest distance a player character can jump in one leap?

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Trademark violation for app?

When was Kai Tak permanently closed to cargo service?

What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?

Would "destroying" Wurmcoil Engine prevent its tokens from being created?

How to convince students of the implication truth values?



How to construct the matrix representation of a bilinear transformation?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Matrix representation of a linear transformation between vector spacesMatrix representation of linear transformationIs there any notation for a matrix representation of a bilinear form?Possible definition of the matrix representation of a linear transformation with respect to given basesFinding the inverse of linear transformation using matrixHow to find the linear transformation associated with a given matrix?Matrix of Linear Transformation $T(X)=XA-AX$ for a given $A$Uniqueness of bilinear transformation $Etimes Fto G$ vector spacesMatrix Representation of Linear Transformation from R2x2 to R3Standard matrix of a transformation, matrix representation










0












$begingroup$


Suppose $fcolon mathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^mtomathbbR^n$ is a bilinear transformation. How do I define and construct the matrix representation of $f$ with respect to the canonical bases of the vector spaces involved? How do I represent in matrix form the action of $f$ on the pair $(u,v)inmathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^m$?



This is not a homework. I'm self studying this topic and can't find this construction in the books I have at my disposal.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    Suppose $fcolon mathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^mtomathbbR^n$ is a bilinear transformation. How do I define and construct the matrix representation of $f$ with respect to the canonical bases of the vector spaces involved? How do I represent in matrix form the action of $f$ on the pair $(u,v)inmathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^m$?



    This is not a homework. I'm self studying this topic and can't find this construction in the books I have at my disposal.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Suppose $fcolon mathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^mtomathbbR^n$ is a bilinear transformation. How do I define and construct the matrix representation of $f$ with respect to the canonical bases of the vector spaces involved? How do I represent in matrix form the action of $f$ on the pair $(u,v)inmathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^m$?



      This is not a homework. I'm self studying this topic and can't find this construction in the books I have at my disposal.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose $fcolon mathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^mtomathbbR^n$ is a bilinear transformation. How do I define and construct the matrix representation of $f$ with respect to the canonical bases of the vector spaces involved? How do I represent in matrix form the action of $f$ on the pair $(u,v)inmathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^m$?



      This is not a homework. I'm self studying this topic and can't find this construction in the books I have at my disposal.







      linear-algebra multilinear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 1 at 13:56









      booNlatoTbooNlatoT

      164




      164




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I would say you can't! You will need three indices such an array!



          If $n=1$, you can use Gramian matrices. For other $n$, the only thing I can think of is creating one of those for each of the $n$ components.



          You could of course just as well make a "canonical application" $c:mathbbR^2m tomathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^m$ and work with $ccdot f$ isntead but I don't think that's what you are looking for






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            0












            $begingroup$

            When $f:Bbb R^ntimesBbb R^ntoBbb R$ the answer is
            $$[f]=[f(e_i,e_j)],$$
            where the $e_i$ are the canonical base vectors.



            Now if $f:Bbb R^ntimesBbb R^ntoBbb R^2$ then
            $f(v,w)=(f_1(v,w),f_2(v,w))$ with both $f_1,f_2$ bilinear so a pair of matrices
            can be associate as:
            $$[f_1]=[f(e_i,e_j)]quad mboxandquad [f_2]=[f_2(e_i,e_j)]$$
            Now you can figure it up what is next.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170637%2fhow-to-construct-the-matrix-representation-of-a-bilinear-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              0












              $begingroup$

              I would say you can't! You will need three indices such an array!



              If $n=1$, you can use Gramian matrices. For other $n$, the only thing I can think of is creating one of those for each of the $n$ components.



              You could of course just as well make a "canonical application" $c:mathbbR^2m tomathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^m$ and work with $ccdot f$ isntead but I don't think that's what you are looking for






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                I would say you can't! You will need three indices such an array!



                If $n=1$, you can use Gramian matrices. For other $n$, the only thing I can think of is creating one of those for each of the $n$ components.



                You could of course just as well make a "canonical application" $c:mathbbR^2m tomathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^m$ and work with $ccdot f$ isntead but I don't think that's what you are looking for






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  I would say you can't! You will need three indices such an array!



                  If $n=1$, you can use Gramian matrices. For other $n$, the only thing I can think of is creating one of those for each of the $n$ components.



                  You could of course just as well make a "canonical application" $c:mathbbR^2m tomathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^m$ and work with $ccdot f$ isntead but I don't think that's what you are looking for






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  I would say you can't! You will need three indices such an array!



                  If $n=1$, you can use Gramian matrices. For other $n$, the only thing I can think of is creating one of those for each of the $n$ components.



                  You could of course just as well make a "canonical application" $c:mathbbR^2m tomathbbR^mtimesmathbbR^m$ and work with $ccdot f$ isntead but I don't think that's what you are looking for







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Apr 1 at 14:16









                  MPW

                  31.2k12157




                  31.2k12157










                  answered Apr 1 at 14:05









                  DavidDavid

                  2377




                  2377





















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      When $f:Bbb R^ntimesBbb R^ntoBbb R$ the answer is
                      $$[f]=[f(e_i,e_j)],$$
                      where the $e_i$ are the canonical base vectors.



                      Now if $f:Bbb R^ntimesBbb R^ntoBbb R^2$ then
                      $f(v,w)=(f_1(v,w),f_2(v,w))$ with both $f_1,f_2$ bilinear so a pair of matrices
                      can be associate as:
                      $$[f_1]=[f(e_i,e_j)]quad mboxandquad [f_2]=[f_2(e_i,e_j)]$$
                      Now you can figure it up what is next.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$

















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        When $f:Bbb R^ntimesBbb R^ntoBbb R$ the answer is
                        $$[f]=[f(e_i,e_j)],$$
                        where the $e_i$ are the canonical base vectors.



                        Now if $f:Bbb R^ntimesBbb R^ntoBbb R^2$ then
                        $f(v,w)=(f_1(v,w),f_2(v,w))$ with both $f_1,f_2$ bilinear so a pair of matrices
                        can be associate as:
                        $$[f_1]=[f(e_i,e_j)]quad mboxandquad [f_2]=[f_2(e_i,e_j)]$$
                        Now you can figure it up what is next.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          When $f:Bbb R^ntimesBbb R^ntoBbb R$ the answer is
                          $$[f]=[f(e_i,e_j)],$$
                          where the $e_i$ are the canonical base vectors.



                          Now if $f:Bbb R^ntimesBbb R^ntoBbb R^2$ then
                          $f(v,w)=(f_1(v,w),f_2(v,w))$ with both $f_1,f_2$ bilinear so a pair of matrices
                          can be associate as:
                          $$[f_1]=[f(e_i,e_j)]quad mboxandquad [f_2]=[f_2(e_i,e_j)]$$
                          Now you can figure it up what is next.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          When $f:Bbb R^ntimesBbb R^ntoBbb R$ the answer is
                          $$[f]=[f(e_i,e_j)],$$
                          where the $e_i$ are the canonical base vectors.



                          Now if $f:Bbb R^ntimesBbb R^ntoBbb R^2$ then
                          $f(v,w)=(f_1(v,w),f_2(v,w))$ with both $f_1,f_2$ bilinear so a pair of matrices
                          can be associate as:
                          $$[f_1]=[f(e_i,e_j)]quad mboxandquad [f_2]=[f_2(e_i,e_j)]$$
                          Now you can figure it up what is next.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Apr 2 at 21:20

























                          answered Apr 2 at 21:08









                          janmarqzjanmarqz

                          6,29241630




                          6,29241630



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170637%2fhow-to-construct-the-matrix-representation-of-a-bilinear-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                              Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                              Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ