Understanding the definition of left derived functor Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How does slice category help create functor?Covariant functor, and left exactWhat is the trivial module functor?Confusion regarding definition of adjoint functor - Hilton and StammbachEilenberg-Mac Lane functor being an embeddingWhat is an alternating functor?Problem with functor Sym and OrdExistence of adjugant with making given natural transformation be the counitDefining contravariant left/right-exact functor with opposite category?Derived functors and induced functors

Most bit efficient text communication method?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?

Extracting terms with certain heads in a function

What does "lightly crushed" mean for cardamon pods?

また usage in a dictionary

What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?

If my PI received research grants from a company to be able to pay my postdoc salary, did I have a potential conflict interest too?

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

Why didn't Eitri join the fight?

Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author

Do square wave exist?

Circuit to "zoom in" on mV fluctuations of a DC signal?

Delete nth line from bottom

Is it common practice to audition new musicians one-on-one before rehearsing with the entire band?

Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?

How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?

Chinese Seal on silk painting - what does it mean?

What font is "z" in "z-score"?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

Irreducible of finite Krull dimension implies quasi-compact?

Would "destroying" Wurmcoil Engine prevent its tokens from being created?

Is there a kind of relay only consumes power when switching?



Understanding the definition of left derived functor



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How does slice category help create functor?Covariant functor, and left exactWhat is the trivial module functor?Confusion regarding definition of adjoint functor - Hilton and StammbachEilenberg-Mac Lane functor being an embeddingWhat is an alternating functor?Problem with functor Sym and OrdExistence of adjugant with making given natural transformation be the counitDefining contravariant left/right-exact functor with opposite category?Derived functors and induced functors










1












$begingroup$


I'm studying homological algebra. But I stuck in a place in Rotman's Advanced Algebra II, 3rd ed. What does $Thatf$ mean in the paragraph? The point made me confused is that $T$ is a functor from $_RtextbfMod$ to $_StextbfMod$, how can $T$ apply on the chain map $hatf$? Is the symbol the author used problematic? And what does the $Thatf$ really mean in the context?



enter image description hereenter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $T$ takes $R$-modules like each $P_A$ and $P'_A'$ to $S$-modules like $TP_A$ and $TP'_A'$. The chain map $checkf: P_A to P'_A'$. So how to denote the induced map from $TP_A to TP'_A'$? $Tcheckf$ seems a natural choice (with some natural abuse of notation)
    $endgroup$
    – bounceback
    Apr 1 at 17:31















1












$begingroup$


I'm studying homological algebra. But I stuck in a place in Rotman's Advanced Algebra II, 3rd ed. What does $Thatf$ mean in the paragraph? The point made me confused is that $T$ is a functor from $_RtextbfMod$ to $_StextbfMod$, how can $T$ apply on the chain map $hatf$? Is the symbol the author used problematic? And what does the $Thatf$ really mean in the context?



enter image description hereenter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $T$ takes $R$-modules like each $P_A$ and $P'_A'$ to $S$-modules like $TP_A$ and $TP'_A'$. The chain map $checkf: P_A to P'_A'$. So how to denote the induced map from $TP_A to TP'_A'$? $Tcheckf$ seems a natural choice (with some natural abuse of notation)
    $endgroup$
    – bounceback
    Apr 1 at 17:31













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I'm studying homological algebra. But I stuck in a place in Rotman's Advanced Algebra II, 3rd ed. What does $Thatf$ mean in the paragraph? The point made me confused is that $T$ is a functor from $_RtextbfMod$ to $_StextbfMod$, how can $T$ apply on the chain map $hatf$? Is the symbol the author used problematic? And what does the $Thatf$ really mean in the context?



enter image description hereenter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm studying homological algebra. But I stuck in a place in Rotman's Advanced Algebra II, 3rd ed. What does $Thatf$ mean in the paragraph? The point made me confused is that $T$ is a functor from $_RtextbfMod$ to $_StextbfMod$, how can $T$ apply on the chain map $hatf$? Is the symbol the author used problematic? And what does the $Thatf$ really mean in the context?



enter image description hereenter image description here







abstract-algebra category-theory homological-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 1 at 17:17







Eric

















asked Apr 1 at 13:57









EricEric

1,846615




1,846615







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $T$ takes $R$-modules like each $P_A$ and $P'_A'$ to $S$-modules like $TP_A$ and $TP'_A'$. The chain map $checkf: P_A to P'_A'$. So how to denote the induced map from $TP_A to TP'_A'$? $Tcheckf$ seems a natural choice (with some natural abuse of notation)
    $endgroup$
    – bounceback
    Apr 1 at 17:31












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $T$ takes $R$-modules like each $P_A$ and $P'_A'$ to $S$-modules like $TP_A$ and $TP'_A'$. The chain map $checkf: P_A to P'_A'$. So how to denote the induced map from $TP_A to TP'_A'$? $Tcheckf$ seems a natural choice (with some natural abuse of notation)
    $endgroup$
    – bounceback
    Apr 1 at 17:31







1




1




$begingroup$
$T$ takes $R$-modules like each $P_A$ and $P'_A'$ to $S$-modules like $TP_A$ and $TP'_A'$. The chain map $checkf: P_A to P'_A'$. So how to denote the induced map from $TP_A to TP'_A'$? $Tcheckf$ seems a natural choice (with some natural abuse of notation)
$endgroup$
– bounceback
Apr 1 at 17:31




$begingroup$
$T$ takes $R$-modules like each $P_A$ and $P'_A'$ to $S$-modules like $TP_A$ and $TP'_A'$. The chain map $checkf: P_A to P'_A'$. So how to denote the induced map from $TP_A to TP'_A'$? $Tcheckf$ seems a natural choice (with some natural abuse of notation)
$endgroup$
– bounceback
Apr 1 at 17:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

It is an abuse of notation : $T$ induces an obvious functor from chain complexes to chain complexes, and the author is just using the same notation for the induced functor.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170638%2funderstanding-the-definition-of-left-derived-functor%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    It is an abuse of notation : $T$ induces an obvious functor from chain complexes to chain complexes, and the author is just using the same notation for the induced functor.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      It is an abuse of notation : $T$ induces an obvious functor from chain complexes to chain complexes, and the author is just using the same notation for the induced functor.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        It is an abuse of notation : $T$ induces an obvious functor from chain complexes to chain complexes, and the author is just using the same notation for the induced functor.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It is an abuse of notation : $T$ induces an obvious functor from chain complexes to chain complexes, and the author is just using the same notation for the induced functor.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 1 at 17:30









        MaxMax

        16.3k11144




        16.3k11144



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170638%2funderstanding-the-definition-of-left-derived-functor%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

            Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

            Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ