Identity for multiple variables minimization Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)sufficient condition for KKT problemsKKT multipliers sign conventionSum greater than 1; minimization for non-strict inequalitiesSolve the closed form solution for argmax of $ x^Ty - x^Tln(x)$Complementary slackness in Hilbert spacesDoubt when applying Complementary Slackness TheoremIs it sufficient to prove Jensen's Inequality holds for an example probability distribution to prove that a function is convex?Understanding binding constraints associated with points in $mathbbR^3$Lagrange Mutiplier for inequality constraintInequality of $min$ and $max$ of functions and their convex-conjugates

Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?

Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?

If u is orthogonal to both v and w, and u not equal to 0, argue that u is not in the span of v and w. (

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?

Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other

Most bit efficient text communication method?

Does classifying an integer as a discrete log require it be part of a multiplicative group?

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

How to Make a Beautiful Stacked 3D Plot

How could we fake a moon landing now?

What font is "z" in "z-score"?

Why are the trig functions versine, haversine, exsecant, etc, rarely used in modern mathematics?

Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?

What is the longest distance a player character can jump in one leap?

Where are Serre’s lectures at Collège de France to be found?

Dating a Former Employee

Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?

Did MS DOS itself ever use blinking text?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

8 Prisoners wearing hats

How do I make this wiring inside cabinet safer? (Pic)

Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?



Identity for multiple variables minimization



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)sufficient condition for KKT problemsKKT multipliers sign conventionSum greater than 1; minimization for non-strict inequalitiesSolve the closed form solution for argmax of $ x^Ty - x^Tln(x)$Complementary slackness in Hilbert spacesDoubt when applying Complementary Slackness TheoremIs it sufficient to prove Jensen's Inequality holds for an example probability distribution to prove that a function is convex?Understanding binding constraints associated with points in $mathbbR^3$Lagrange Mutiplier for inequality constraintInequality of $min$ and $max$ of functions and their convex-conjugates










0












$begingroup$


I would like the prove the following identity:



$$minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)+g(mathbfy)]=minlimits_mathbfx[f(mathbfx)]+minlimits_mathbfy[g(mathbfy)]$$



At first, I supposed that this should be an inequality, because I tried proving this by doing:



beginalign
minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)+g(mathbfy)]geq minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)]+minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[g(mathbfy)]
endalign



But I am not sure if this is correct...



Could someone help me proving this by using some basic principles and properties? Also, are there any conditions/constraints over the functions so that the proposed equality holds?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    I would like the prove the following identity:



    $$minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)+g(mathbfy)]=minlimits_mathbfx[f(mathbfx)]+minlimits_mathbfy[g(mathbfy)]$$



    At first, I supposed that this should be an inequality, because I tried proving this by doing:



    beginalign
    minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)+g(mathbfy)]geq minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)]+minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[g(mathbfy)]
    endalign



    But I am not sure if this is correct...



    Could someone help me proving this by using some basic principles and properties? Also, are there any conditions/constraints over the functions so that the proposed equality holds?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I would like the prove the following identity:



      $$minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)+g(mathbfy)]=minlimits_mathbfx[f(mathbfx)]+minlimits_mathbfy[g(mathbfy)]$$



      At first, I supposed that this should be an inequality, because I tried proving this by doing:



      beginalign
      minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)+g(mathbfy)]geq minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)]+minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[g(mathbfy)]
      endalign



      But I am not sure if this is correct...



      Could someone help me proving this by using some basic principles and properties? Also, are there any conditions/constraints over the functions so that the proposed equality holds?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I would like the prove the following identity:



      $$minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)+g(mathbfy)]=minlimits_mathbfx[f(mathbfx)]+minlimits_mathbfy[g(mathbfy)]$$



      At first, I supposed that this should be an inequality, because I tried proving this by doing:



      beginalign
      minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)+g(mathbfy)]geq minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[f(mathbfx)]+minlimits_mathbfx,mathbfy[g(mathbfy)]
      endalign



      But I am not sure if this is correct...



      Could someone help me proving this by using some basic principles and properties? Also, are there any conditions/constraints over the functions so that the proposed equality holds?







      inequality optimization maxima-minima






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 1 at 15:01







      bertozzijr

















      asked Apr 1 at 14:39









      bertozzijrbertozzijr

      6331720




      6331720




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You have
          $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) leq f(x)+g(y), quad textfor all,, x,y$$
          which implies
          $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) leq min_x f(x)+ min_y g(y)$$
          On the other hand
          $$f(x)+g(y) geq min_x f(x) + min_y g(y), quad textfor all,, x,y$$
          therefore
          $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) geq min_x f(x)+ min_y g(y)$$
          So you have the equality.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170693%2fidentity-for-multiple-variables-minimization%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            You have
            $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) leq f(x)+g(y), quad textfor all,, x,y$$
            which implies
            $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) leq min_x f(x)+ min_y g(y)$$
            On the other hand
            $$f(x)+g(y) geq min_x f(x) + min_y g(y), quad textfor all,, x,y$$
            therefore
            $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) geq min_x f(x)+ min_y g(y)$$
            So you have the equality.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              You have
              $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) leq f(x)+g(y), quad textfor all,, x,y$$
              which implies
              $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) leq min_x f(x)+ min_y g(y)$$
              On the other hand
              $$f(x)+g(y) geq min_x f(x) + min_y g(y), quad textfor all,, x,y$$
              therefore
              $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) geq min_x f(x)+ min_y g(y)$$
              So you have the equality.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                You have
                $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) leq f(x)+g(y), quad textfor all,, x,y$$
                which implies
                $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) leq min_x f(x)+ min_y g(y)$$
                On the other hand
                $$f(x)+g(y) geq min_x f(x) + min_y g(y), quad textfor all,, x,y$$
                therefore
                $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) geq min_x f(x)+ min_y g(y)$$
                So you have the equality.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                You have
                $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) leq f(x)+g(y), quad textfor all,, x,y$$
                which implies
                $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) leq min_x f(x)+ min_y g(y)$$
                On the other hand
                $$f(x)+g(y) geq min_x f(x) + min_y g(y), quad textfor all,, x,y$$
                therefore
                $$min_x,y (f(x)+g(y)) geq min_x f(x)+ min_y g(y)$$
                So you have the equality.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Apr 1 at 20:10

























                answered Apr 1 at 19:56









                RaminRamin

                112




                112



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170693%2fidentity-for-multiple-variables-minimization%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                    Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                    Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ