proofverification of $lim_nrightarrowinftysqrt[n]n+s=1$ where $sge 0$ and request for an easier proof The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProof that $lim_nrightarrow infty sqrt[n]n=1$Find $lim_n rightarrow inftysqrtn(A_n+1 − A_n)$ where $A_n = frac1n(a_1 + a_2 + cdots + a_n)$troubles proving $lim_nrightarrowinftysqrt[n]n=1$How to prove $lim_n to inftya_n=1 rightarrow lim_n to inftysqrt[n] a_n=1$find $lim_n rightarrow inftysqrtn(A_n+1 − A_n)$Prove $lim_nrightarrowinfty(a_n + b_n) = a + b$ if $lim_nrightarrowinftya_n=a$ and $lim_nrightarrowinftyb_n=b$When does equality for $x_n < y_n Rightarrow lim_n rightarrow infty x_n leq lim_n rightarrow infty y_n$ hold?If $lim_n rightarrow infty a_n = L > 0$. Prove. $lim_n rightarrow infty sqrta_n = sqrtL$ convergesShow that $limlimits_nrightarrowinfty(nb^n)=0$ for $0<b<1$Find the limit $lim_ntoinftyfracx_n + x_n^2 + cdots + x_n^k - kx_n - 1$ given $x_n ne 1$ and $lim x_n = 1$

Who coined the term "madman theory"?

Statement true because not provable

Write faster on AT24C32

FPGA - DIY Programming

Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?

What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?

Building a conditional check constraint

Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?

Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?

Falsification in Math vs Science

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Sci-fi book where a human is taken from Earth to help man an alien ship in a fight against other aliens and rises through the ranks to command

One word riddle: Vowel in the middle

How are Package `Private` variables accessed?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?



proofverification of $lim_nrightarrowinftysqrt[n]n+s=1$ where $sge 0$ and request for an easier proof



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProof that $lim_nrightarrow infty sqrt[n]n=1$Find $lim_n rightarrow inftysqrtn(A_n+1 − A_n)$ where $A_n = frac1n(a_1 + a_2 + cdots + a_n)$troubles proving $lim_nrightarrowinftysqrt[n]n=1$How to prove $lim_n to inftya_n=1 rightarrow lim_n to inftysqrt[n] a_n=1$find $lim_n rightarrow inftysqrtn(A_n+1 − A_n)$Prove $lim_nrightarrowinfty(a_n + b_n) = a + b$ if $lim_nrightarrowinftya_n=a$ and $lim_nrightarrowinftyb_n=b$When does equality for $x_n < y_n Rightarrow lim_n rightarrow infty x_n leq lim_n rightarrow infty y_n$ hold?If $lim_n rightarrow infty a_n = L > 0$. Prove. $lim_n rightarrow infty sqrta_n = sqrtL$ convergesShow that $limlimits_nrightarrowinfty(nb^n)=0$ for $0<b<1$Find the limit $lim_ntoinftyfracx_n + x_n^2 + cdots + x_n^k - kx_n - 1$ given $x_n ne 1$ and $lim x_n = 1$










0












$begingroup$


I have basically copied the original proof that $lim_nrightarrowinftysqrt[n]n=1$ and I hope that there are no mistakes:



$x_n=sqrt[n]n+s-1geq0$



$n+s=(x_n+1)^ngeq1+binomn2x_n^2=1+fracn(n-1)2x_n^2$



Therefore $x_nleqsqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$



And therefore $0leqsqrt[n]n+s-1=x_nleq sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$



From now on I have stoppped to copy the original proof



$lim$ stands for $lim_nrightarrow infty$



And because $limfrac2(n-1)2(n-1)+2s=lim 1-frac2s2(n-1)+2s=1$ And the rule if $lim a_n=a>0$ then $lim sqrt[k]a_n=sqrt[k]a$



I can say (I am not sure if I am really allowed to do that, some verification would be appreciated)



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$$



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)cdot 1$$



This is the step where I am asking for verification



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n-1)+2sn(n-1)cdot sqrtfrac2(n-1)2(n-1)+2s$$



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2n=0$$



Is the proof alright? I hope there is an easier one










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For an easier proof, notice $sqrt[n]nlesqrt[n]n+slesqrt[n]2n$ for sufficiently large $n$ and then squeeze.
    $endgroup$
    – Thorgott
    Mar 30 at 16:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Thorgott Why not an official answer?
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Mar 30 at 16:23










  • $begingroup$
    Why the restriction on $s$?
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 30 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    If s is negative the root does not exist (yet) for $sqrt-1$
    $endgroup$
    – New2Math
    Mar 30 at 16:25











  • $begingroup$
    @New2Math, then $sge 0$ is enough. $sinBbb N$ isn't required.
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 30 at 16:27















0












$begingroup$


I have basically copied the original proof that $lim_nrightarrowinftysqrt[n]n=1$ and I hope that there are no mistakes:



$x_n=sqrt[n]n+s-1geq0$



$n+s=(x_n+1)^ngeq1+binomn2x_n^2=1+fracn(n-1)2x_n^2$



Therefore $x_nleqsqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$



And therefore $0leqsqrt[n]n+s-1=x_nleq sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$



From now on I have stoppped to copy the original proof



$lim$ stands for $lim_nrightarrow infty$



And because $limfrac2(n-1)2(n-1)+2s=lim 1-frac2s2(n-1)+2s=1$ And the rule if $lim a_n=a>0$ then $lim sqrt[k]a_n=sqrt[k]a$



I can say (I am not sure if I am really allowed to do that, some verification would be appreciated)



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$$



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)cdot 1$$



This is the step where I am asking for verification



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n-1)+2sn(n-1)cdot sqrtfrac2(n-1)2(n-1)+2s$$



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2n=0$$



Is the proof alright? I hope there is an easier one










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For an easier proof, notice $sqrt[n]nlesqrt[n]n+slesqrt[n]2n$ for sufficiently large $n$ and then squeeze.
    $endgroup$
    – Thorgott
    Mar 30 at 16:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Thorgott Why not an official answer?
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Mar 30 at 16:23










  • $begingroup$
    Why the restriction on $s$?
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 30 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    If s is negative the root does not exist (yet) for $sqrt-1$
    $endgroup$
    – New2Math
    Mar 30 at 16:25











  • $begingroup$
    @New2Math, then $sge 0$ is enough. $sinBbb N$ isn't required.
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 30 at 16:27













0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have basically copied the original proof that $lim_nrightarrowinftysqrt[n]n=1$ and I hope that there are no mistakes:



$x_n=sqrt[n]n+s-1geq0$



$n+s=(x_n+1)^ngeq1+binomn2x_n^2=1+fracn(n-1)2x_n^2$



Therefore $x_nleqsqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$



And therefore $0leqsqrt[n]n+s-1=x_nleq sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$



From now on I have stoppped to copy the original proof



$lim$ stands for $lim_nrightarrow infty$



And because $limfrac2(n-1)2(n-1)+2s=lim 1-frac2s2(n-1)+2s=1$ And the rule if $lim a_n=a>0$ then $lim sqrt[k]a_n=sqrt[k]a$



I can say (I am not sure if I am really allowed to do that, some verification would be appreciated)



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$$



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)cdot 1$$



This is the step where I am asking for verification



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n-1)+2sn(n-1)cdot sqrtfrac2(n-1)2(n-1)+2s$$



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2n=0$$



Is the proof alright? I hope there is an easier one










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have basically copied the original proof that $lim_nrightarrowinftysqrt[n]n=1$ and I hope that there are no mistakes:



$x_n=sqrt[n]n+s-1geq0$



$n+s=(x_n+1)^ngeq1+binomn2x_n^2=1+fracn(n-1)2x_n^2$



Therefore $x_nleqsqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$



And therefore $0leqsqrt[n]n+s-1=x_nleq sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$



From now on I have stoppped to copy the original proof



$lim$ stands for $lim_nrightarrow infty$



And because $limfrac2(n-1)2(n-1)+2s=lim 1-frac2s2(n-1)+2s=1$ And the rule if $lim a_n=a>0$ then $lim sqrt[k]a_n=sqrt[k]a$



I can say (I am not sure if I am really allowed to do that, some verification would be appreciated)



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)$$



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n+s-1)n(n-1)cdot 1$$



This is the step where I am asking for verification



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2(n-1)+2sn(n-1)cdot sqrtfrac2(n-1)2(n-1)+2s$$



$$lim 0leq limsqrt[n]n+s-1=lim x_nleq lim sqrtfrac2n=0$$



Is the proof alright? I hope there is an easier one







real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 30 at 16:30







New2Math

















asked Mar 30 at 16:15









New2MathNew2Math

18315




18315







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For an easier proof, notice $sqrt[n]nlesqrt[n]n+slesqrt[n]2n$ for sufficiently large $n$ and then squeeze.
    $endgroup$
    – Thorgott
    Mar 30 at 16:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Thorgott Why not an official answer?
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Mar 30 at 16:23










  • $begingroup$
    Why the restriction on $s$?
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 30 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    If s is negative the root does not exist (yet) for $sqrt-1$
    $endgroup$
    – New2Math
    Mar 30 at 16:25











  • $begingroup$
    @New2Math, then $sge 0$ is enough. $sinBbb N$ isn't required.
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 30 at 16:27












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For an easier proof, notice $sqrt[n]nlesqrt[n]n+slesqrt[n]2n$ for sufficiently large $n$ and then squeeze.
    $endgroup$
    – Thorgott
    Mar 30 at 16:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Thorgott Why not an official answer?
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Mar 30 at 16:23










  • $begingroup$
    Why the restriction on $s$?
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 30 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    If s is negative the root does not exist (yet) for $sqrt-1$
    $endgroup$
    – New2Math
    Mar 30 at 16:25











  • $begingroup$
    @New2Math, then $sge 0$ is enough. $sinBbb N$ isn't required.
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 30 at 16:27







1




1




$begingroup$
For an easier proof, notice $sqrt[n]nlesqrt[n]n+slesqrt[n]2n$ for sufficiently large $n$ and then squeeze.
$endgroup$
– Thorgott
Mar 30 at 16:21




$begingroup$
For an easier proof, notice $sqrt[n]nlesqrt[n]n+slesqrt[n]2n$ for sufficiently large $n$ and then squeeze.
$endgroup$
– Thorgott
Mar 30 at 16:21












$begingroup$
@Thorgott Why not an official answer?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Mar 30 at 16:23




$begingroup$
@Thorgott Why not an official answer?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Mar 30 at 16:23












$begingroup$
Why the restriction on $s$?
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Mar 30 at 16:24




$begingroup$
Why the restriction on $s$?
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Mar 30 at 16:24












$begingroup$
If s is negative the root does not exist (yet) for $sqrt-1$
$endgroup$
– New2Math
Mar 30 at 16:25





$begingroup$
If s is negative the root does not exist (yet) for $sqrt-1$
$endgroup$
– New2Math
Mar 30 at 16:25













$begingroup$
@New2Math, then $sge 0$ is enough. $sinBbb N$ isn't required.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Mar 30 at 16:27




$begingroup$
@New2Math, then $sge 0$ is enough. $sinBbb N$ isn't required.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Mar 30 at 16:27










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Easier proof:
$$lim_ntoinftylog(sqrt[n]n+s) = lim_ntoinftyfraclog(n+s)n = 0.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    I think an easier one, goes like this:$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]an=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]asqrt[n]n\=lim_nto infty1cdotsqrt[n]n\=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n$$for $a>0$. Also$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n=lim_uto infty e^ue^-u=e^0=1$$therefore$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]an=1$$ and hence$$1=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]nlelim_nto inftysqrt[n]n+sle lim_nto inftysqrt[n]2n=1$$which implies that$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n+s=1$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168462%2fproofverification-of-lim-n-rightarrow-infty-sqrtnns-1-where-s-ge-0-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0












      $begingroup$

      Easier proof:
      $$lim_ntoinftylog(sqrt[n]n+s) = lim_ntoinftyfraclog(n+s)n = 0.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        0












        $begingroup$

        Easier proof:
        $$lim_ntoinftylog(sqrt[n]n+s) = lim_ntoinftyfraclog(n+s)n = 0.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Easier proof:
          $$lim_ntoinftylog(sqrt[n]n+s) = lim_ntoinftyfraclog(n+s)n = 0.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Easier proof:
          $$lim_ntoinftylog(sqrt[n]n+s) = lim_ntoinftyfraclog(n+s)n = 0.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 30 at 16:27









          Martín-Blas Pérez PinillaMartín-Blas Pérez Pinilla

          35.4k42972




          35.4k42972





















              0












              $begingroup$

              I think an easier one, goes like this:$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]an=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]asqrt[n]n\=lim_nto infty1cdotsqrt[n]n\=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n$$for $a>0$. Also$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n=lim_uto infty e^ue^-u=e^0=1$$therefore$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]an=1$$ and hence$$1=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]nlelim_nto inftysqrt[n]n+sle lim_nto inftysqrt[n]2n=1$$which implies that$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n+s=1$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                I think an easier one, goes like this:$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]an=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]asqrt[n]n\=lim_nto infty1cdotsqrt[n]n\=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n$$for $a>0$. Also$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n=lim_uto infty e^ue^-u=e^0=1$$therefore$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]an=1$$ and hence$$1=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]nlelim_nto inftysqrt[n]n+sle lim_nto inftysqrt[n]2n=1$$which implies that$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n+s=1$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  I think an easier one, goes like this:$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]an=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]asqrt[n]n\=lim_nto infty1cdotsqrt[n]n\=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n$$for $a>0$. Also$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n=lim_uto infty e^ue^-u=e^0=1$$therefore$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]an=1$$ and hence$$1=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]nlelim_nto inftysqrt[n]n+sle lim_nto inftysqrt[n]2n=1$$which implies that$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n+s=1$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I think an easier one, goes like this:$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]an=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]asqrt[n]n\=lim_nto infty1cdotsqrt[n]n\=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n$$for $a>0$. Also$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n=lim_uto infty e^ue^-u=e^0=1$$therefore$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]an=1$$ and hence$$1=lim_nto inftysqrt[n]nlelim_nto inftysqrt[n]n+sle lim_nto inftysqrt[n]2n=1$$which implies that$$lim_nto inftysqrt[n]n+s=1$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 3 at 17:22









                  Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

                  18.1k31040




                  18.1k31040



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168462%2fproofverification-of-lim-n-rightarrow-infty-sqrtnns-1-where-s-ge-0-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

                      Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O

                      Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleaguesHow can I better understand manager or clients with strong accents?Adding more movement and speech at the fundamental level to a highly-sedentary job?Difficulty in understanding Manager's accent(language and communication)How to adjust yourself where your colleagues are not understanding to you?Understanding manager's expectationsForeigner and colleagues using slangHaving difficulty understanding meetingsHow do you breathe when giving a speech?Trouble Waking Up for Emergencies (On-Call)Problems with colleaguesColleagues feeling insecure when I do my work