Linear Algebra: The sum of dot-products summarized in a matrix matrix product The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InRelationship between the rows and columns of a matrixWhat linear-algebra operation produces this vector?Linear Algebra - Getting Orthogonal Matrix?The “extended” dot productCombining Column- and Row-wise meanings of a matrixWhat is an intuitive way to understand the dot product in the context of matrix multiplication?Basic Linear Algebra VisualisationElement wise versus dot product rules for matrix multiplicationLinear combination of vectors vs Dot product in Matrix vector multiplicationMatrix-vector product: representing matrix as vector of vectors seemingly leads to paradox when transposing the matrix

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Geography at the pixel level

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?

How come people say “Would of”?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

Delete all lines which don't have n characters before delimiter

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

slides for 30min~1hr skype tenure track application interview

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Is there a symbol for a right arrow with a square in the middle?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)

How to save as into a customized destination on macOS?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

How to check whether the reindex working or not in Magento?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Is bread bad for ducks?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?



Linear Algebra: The sum of dot-products summarized in a matrix matrix product



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InRelationship between the rows and columns of a matrixWhat linear-algebra operation produces this vector?Linear Algebra - Getting Orthogonal Matrix?The “extended” dot productCombining Column- and Row-wise meanings of a matrixWhat is an intuitive way to understand the dot product in the context of matrix multiplication?Basic Linear Algebra VisualisationElement wise versus dot product rules for matrix multiplicationLinear combination of vectors vs Dot product in Matrix vector multiplicationMatrix-vector product: representing matrix as vector of vectors seemingly leads to paradox when transposing the matrix










0












$begingroup$


While reading a section on orthogonal matrices, where $vecu_1, ..., vecu_n$ is an orthonormal set of vectors, I find the equation



$$(vecu_1vecu_1^t + ... + vecu_nvecu_n^t)vecx= beginbmatrix
| & ... & | \
vecu_1 & ... & vecu_n \
| & ... & |
endbmatrixbeginbmatrix
-vecu_1^t-\
...\
-vecu_n^t-endbmatrixvecx$$



Now I'm familiar with summarizing a linear combination of vectors by a matrix-vector product, but in doing so I use my concept of the dot product between a row vector in the matrix and the column vector written to the right. This is related to how, in the matrix product, you're basically doing a bunch of dot-products between rows in the left matrix and columns in the right.



Here is something different though, and I'm not sure how I ought to think about it. The columns are written in the left matrix and rows in the right. I don't see how this is consistent with the dot-product view of matrix products. I could chase indices by thinking of the coordinate-wise definition of matrix products, but I feel like the author intends for a better more natural way of understanding this equation.



So is there a good column-row understanding of matrix products, which makes the above equation sensible? Or is the only good way of understanding this by thinking in terms of the coordinate-wise definition of matrix products?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    While reading a section on orthogonal matrices, where $vecu_1, ..., vecu_n$ is an orthonormal set of vectors, I find the equation



    $$(vecu_1vecu_1^t + ... + vecu_nvecu_n^t)vecx= beginbmatrix
    | & ... & | \
    vecu_1 & ... & vecu_n \
    | & ... & |
    endbmatrixbeginbmatrix
    -vecu_1^t-\
    ...\
    -vecu_n^t-endbmatrixvecx$$



    Now I'm familiar with summarizing a linear combination of vectors by a matrix-vector product, but in doing so I use my concept of the dot product between a row vector in the matrix and the column vector written to the right. This is related to how, in the matrix product, you're basically doing a bunch of dot-products between rows in the left matrix and columns in the right.



    Here is something different though, and I'm not sure how I ought to think about it. The columns are written in the left matrix and rows in the right. I don't see how this is consistent with the dot-product view of matrix products. I could chase indices by thinking of the coordinate-wise definition of matrix products, but I feel like the author intends for a better more natural way of understanding this equation.



    So is there a good column-row understanding of matrix products, which makes the above equation sensible? Or is the only good way of understanding this by thinking in terms of the coordinate-wise definition of matrix products?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      While reading a section on orthogonal matrices, where $vecu_1, ..., vecu_n$ is an orthonormal set of vectors, I find the equation



      $$(vecu_1vecu_1^t + ... + vecu_nvecu_n^t)vecx= beginbmatrix
      | & ... & | \
      vecu_1 & ... & vecu_n \
      | & ... & |
      endbmatrixbeginbmatrix
      -vecu_1^t-\
      ...\
      -vecu_n^t-endbmatrixvecx$$



      Now I'm familiar with summarizing a linear combination of vectors by a matrix-vector product, but in doing so I use my concept of the dot product between a row vector in the matrix and the column vector written to the right. This is related to how, in the matrix product, you're basically doing a bunch of dot-products between rows in the left matrix and columns in the right.



      Here is something different though, and I'm not sure how I ought to think about it. The columns are written in the left matrix and rows in the right. I don't see how this is consistent with the dot-product view of matrix products. I could chase indices by thinking of the coordinate-wise definition of matrix products, but I feel like the author intends for a better more natural way of understanding this equation.



      So is there a good column-row understanding of matrix products, which makes the above equation sensible? Or is the only good way of understanding this by thinking in terms of the coordinate-wise definition of matrix products?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      While reading a section on orthogonal matrices, where $vecu_1, ..., vecu_n$ is an orthonormal set of vectors, I find the equation



      $$(vecu_1vecu_1^t + ... + vecu_nvecu_n^t)vecx= beginbmatrix
      | & ... & | \
      vecu_1 & ... & vecu_n \
      | & ... & |
      endbmatrixbeginbmatrix
      -vecu_1^t-\
      ...\
      -vecu_n^t-endbmatrixvecx$$



      Now I'm familiar with summarizing a linear combination of vectors by a matrix-vector product, but in doing so I use my concept of the dot product between a row vector in the matrix and the column vector written to the right. This is related to how, in the matrix product, you're basically doing a bunch of dot-products between rows in the left matrix and columns in the right.



      Here is something different though, and I'm not sure how I ought to think about it. The columns are written in the left matrix and rows in the right. I don't see how this is consistent with the dot-product view of matrix products. I could chase indices by thinking of the coordinate-wise definition of matrix products, but I feel like the author intends for a better more natural way of understanding this equation.



      So is there a good column-row understanding of matrix products, which makes the above equation sensible? Or is the only good way of understanding this by thinking in terms of the coordinate-wise definition of matrix products?







      linear-algebra matrices matrix-equations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 30 at 17:54









      AddemAddem

      1,7561429




      1,7561429




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          This can be written as
          $$
          pmatrix vec u_1 & cdots & vec u_n
          left[
          pmatrix vec u_1^T \ vdots \ vec u_n^T
          vec x
          right],
          $$

          where the product in brackets are dot products of $x$ and vectors $u_i$. The resulting numbers are then used to get a linear combination of the vectors $u_i$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168578%2flinear-algebra-the-sum-of-dot-products-summarized-in-a-matrix-matrix-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            This can be written as
            $$
            pmatrix vec u_1 & cdots & vec u_n
            left[
            pmatrix vec u_1^T \ vdots \ vec u_n^T
            vec x
            right],
            $$

            where the product in brackets are dot products of $x$ and vectors $u_i$. The resulting numbers are then used to get a linear combination of the vectors $u_i$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              This can be written as
              $$
              pmatrix vec u_1 & cdots & vec u_n
              left[
              pmatrix vec u_1^T \ vdots \ vec u_n^T
              vec x
              right],
              $$

              where the product in brackets are dot products of $x$ and vectors $u_i$. The resulting numbers are then used to get a linear combination of the vectors $u_i$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                This can be written as
                $$
                pmatrix vec u_1 & cdots & vec u_n
                left[
                pmatrix vec u_1^T \ vdots \ vec u_n^T
                vec x
                right],
                $$

                where the product in brackets are dot products of $x$ and vectors $u_i$. The resulting numbers are then used to get a linear combination of the vectors $u_i$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                This can be written as
                $$
                pmatrix vec u_1 & cdots & vec u_n
                left[
                pmatrix vec u_1^T \ vdots \ vec u_n^T
                vec x
                right],
                $$

                where the product in brackets are dot products of $x$ and vectors $u_i$. The resulting numbers are then used to get a linear combination of the vectors $u_i$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 1 at 11:34









                dawdaw

                25.1k1745




                25.1k1745



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168578%2flinear-algebra-the-sum-of-dot-products-summarized-in-a-matrix-matrix-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                    Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                    Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire