Representation of $V$ and polynomial rings The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIs the dual representation of an irreducible representation always irreducible?Is every linear representation of a group $G$ on $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ a dual representation?Equivalence of induced representationQuick question about formal definition of a representationDual space isomorphism and the dual representationPrimitive action vs. irreducible representationSymmetric polynomials in quotient of polynomial rings.Right-action representation definition, equivalence with left action repEquivalent representation definitionsGroup representation preserving finitely many generators
Return to UK after being refused entry years previously
How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?
Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?
Why can Shazam fly?
How to manage monthly salary
What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?
Is a "Democratic" Oligarchy-Style System Possible?
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
Do these rules for Critical Successes and Critical Failures seem Fair?
Earliest use of the term "Galois extension"?
Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?
Worn-tile Scrabble
Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?
Why do we hear so much about the Trump administration deciding to impose and then remove tariffs?
Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?
Geography at the pixel level
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
Who coined the term "madman theory"?
Representation of $V$ and polynomial rings
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIs the dual representation of an irreducible representation always irreducible?Is every linear representation of a group $G$ on $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ a dual representation?Equivalence of induced representationQuick question about formal definition of a representationDual space isomorphism and the dual representationPrimitive action vs. irreducible representationSymmetric polynomials in quotient of polynomial rings.Right-action representation definition, equivalence with left action repEquivalent representation definitionsGroup representation preserving finitely many generators
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be a complex vector space. Let $G$ be a finite group and let $$rho: G rightarrow GL(V)$$ be a representation of $G$.
Let $V^*$ denote the dual space of $V$, and let $mathcalO(V)$ denote the algebra of functions $F: V rightarrow mathbbC$ generated by the elements of $V^*$. Elements of $mathcalO(V)$ are called regular functions.
The dual representation $rho^*: G rightarrow GL(V^*)$ is given by $$(rho^*(g)f)(v) = f(rho(g)^-1v), forall g in G, f in V^*, v in V$$
Define the ring of invariant functions to be $$mathcalO(V)^G = f in mathcalO(V) : gf = f hspace2mm forall g in G$$
where $gf$ is just shorthand for $rho^*(g)f$.
Now, when we restrict to $V^* subset mathcalO(V)$, where $V^*$ has basis $x_1,...,x_n$, the regular functions are polynomials in the $x_i$ and the action of $G$ is given by $$gp(x_1,...,x_n) = p(gx_1,...,gx_n)$$ for some polynomial $p$.
$(1)$ - I don't understand this last bit? What is the distinction between $V^*$ and $mathcalO(V)$? Is $V^*$ just the set of $mathbbC$-linear sums of $x_1,...,x_n$? There is no multiplication between the $x_i$ defined? And an element of $mathcalO(V)$ is of the form $p(x_1,...,x_n)$ for any polynomial $p$ with complex coefficients(as multiplication is defined here)?
$(2)$ - What does restrict to $V^*$ mean? Does it mean to restrict the action of $G$ to $V^*$? I thought the action was only defined on $V^*$ to begin with?
$(3)$ - Also, when something like $mathbbC[V]$ is written in this context, what does this mean? What does $G$ acting on $mathbbC[V]$ mean?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra vector-spaces representation-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be a complex vector space. Let $G$ be a finite group and let $$rho: G rightarrow GL(V)$$ be a representation of $G$.
Let $V^*$ denote the dual space of $V$, and let $mathcalO(V)$ denote the algebra of functions $F: V rightarrow mathbbC$ generated by the elements of $V^*$. Elements of $mathcalO(V)$ are called regular functions.
The dual representation $rho^*: G rightarrow GL(V^*)$ is given by $$(rho^*(g)f)(v) = f(rho(g)^-1v), forall g in G, f in V^*, v in V$$
Define the ring of invariant functions to be $$mathcalO(V)^G = f in mathcalO(V) : gf = f hspace2mm forall g in G$$
where $gf$ is just shorthand for $rho^*(g)f$.
Now, when we restrict to $V^* subset mathcalO(V)$, where $V^*$ has basis $x_1,...,x_n$, the regular functions are polynomials in the $x_i$ and the action of $G$ is given by $$gp(x_1,...,x_n) = p(gx_1,...,gx_n)$$ for some polynomial $p$.
$(1)$ - I don't understand this last bit? What is the distinction between $V^*$ and $mathcalO(V)$? Is $V^*$ just the set of $mathbbC$-linear sums of $x_1,...,x_n$? There is no multiplication between the $x_i$ defined? And an element of $mathcalO(V)$ is of the form $p(x_1,...,x_n)$ for any polynomial $p$ with complex coefficients(as multiplication is defined here)?
$(2)$ - What does restrict to $V^*$ mean? Does it mean to restrict the action of $G$ to $V^*$? I thought the action was only defined on $V^*$ to begin with?
$(3)$ - Also, when something like $mathbbC[V]$ is written in this context, what does this mean? What does $G$ acting on $mathbbC[V]$ mean?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra vector-spaces representation-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be a complex vector space. Let $G$ be a finite group and let $$rho: G rightarrow GL(V)$$ be a representation of $G$.
Let $V^*$ denote the dual space of $V$, and let $mathcalO(V)$ denote the algebra of functions $F: V rightarrow mathbbC$ generated by the elements of $V^*$. Elements of $mathcalO(V)$ are called regular functions.
The dual representation $rho^*: G rightarrow GL(V^*)$ is given by $$(rho^*(g)f)(v) = f(rho(g)^-1v), forall g in G, f in V^*, v in V$$
Define the ring of invariant functions to be $$mathcalO(V)^G = f in mathcalO(V) : gf = f hspace2mm forall g in G$$
where $gf$ is just shorthand for $rho^*(g)f$.
Now, when we restrict to $V^* subset mathcalO(V)$, where $V^*$ has basis $x_1,...,x_n$, the regular functions are polynomials in the $x_i$ and the action of $G$ is given by $$gp(x_1,...,x_n) = p(gx_1,...,gx_n)$$ for some polynomial $p$.
$(1)$ - I don't understand this last bit? What is the distinction between $V^*$ and $mathcalO(V)$? Is $V^*$ just the set of $mathbbC$-linear sums of $x_1,...,x_n$? There is no multiplication between the $x_i$ defined? And an element of $mathcalO(V)$ is of the form $p(x_1,...,x_n)$ for any polynomial $p$ with complex coefficients(as multiplication is defined here)?
$(2)$ - What does restrict to $V^*$ mean? Does it mean to restrict the action of $G$ to $V^*$? I thought the action was only defined on $V^*$ to begin with?
$(3)$ - Also, when something like $mathbbC[V]$ is written in this context, what does this mean? What does $G$ acting on $mathbbC[V]$ mean?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra vector-spaces representation-theory
$endgroup$
Let $V$ be a complex vector space. Let $G$ be a finite group and let $$rho: G rightarrow GL(V)$$ be a representation of $G$.
Let $V^*$ denote the dual space of $V$, and let $mathcalO(V)$ denote the algebra of functions $F: V rightarrow mathbbC$ generated by the elements of $V^*$. Elements of $mathcalO(V)$ are called regular functions.
The dual representation $rho^*: G rightarrow GL(V^*)$ is given by $$(rho^*(g)f)(v) = f(rho(g)^-1v), forall g in G, f in V^*, v in V$$
Define the ring of invariant functions to be $$mathcalO(V)^G = f in mathcalO(V) : gf = f hspace2mm forall g in G$$
where $gf$ is just shorthand for $rho^*(g)f$.
Now, when we restrict to $V^* subset mathcalO(V)$, where $V^*$ has basis $x_1,...,x_n$, the regular functions are polynomials in the $x_i$ and the action of $G$ is given by $$gp(x_1,...,x_n) = p(gx_1,...,gx_n)$$ for some polynomial $p$.
$(1)$ - I don't understand this last bit? What is the distinction between $V^*$ and $mathcalO(V)$? Is $V^*$ just the set of $mathbbC$-linear sums of $x_1,...,x_n$? There is no multiplication between the $x_i$ defined? And an element of $mathcalO(V)$ is of the form $p(x_1,...,x_n)$ for any polynomial $p$ with complex coefficients(as multiplication is defined here)?
$(2)$ - What does restrict to $V^*$ mean? Does it mean to restrict the action of $G$ to $V^*$? I thought the action was only defined on $V^*$ to begin with?
$(3)$ - Also, when something like $mathbbC[V]$ is written in this context, what does this mean? What does $G$ acting on $mathbbC[V]$ mean?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra vector-spaces representation-theory
linear-algebra abstract-algebra vector-spaces representation-theory
asked Mar 30 at 17:09
the manthe man
831716
831716
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For (1) you are completely correct.
For (2), the idea is that the statement is meant to define the action on all of $mathcalO(V)$, so the part about restriction to $V^*$ seems to be an error (since you are correct that the action was originally just defined on $V^*$).
For (3), $mathbbC[V]$ refers to the polynomial ring in $n$ variables where $n$ is the dimension of $V$, with the variables identified with a basis of $V$. But writing is like that means we don't need to pick a basis, which can have some advantages.
The main idea is that any representation on $V$ can be extended to $mathbbC[V]$ similarly to what was done for $mathcalO(V)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
$endgroup$
– the man
Mar 31 at 1:12
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168533%2frepresentation-of-v-and-polynomial-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For (1) you are completely correct.
For (2), the idea is that the statement is meant to define the action on all of $mathcalO(V)$, so the part about restriction to $V^*$ seems to be an error (since you are correct that the action was originally just defined on $V^*$).
For (3), $mathbbC[V]$ refers to the polynomial ring in $n$ variables where $n$ is the dimension of $V$, with the variables identified with a basis of $V$. But writing is like that means we don't need to pick a basis, which can have some advantages.
The main idea is that any representation on $V$ can be extended to $mathbbC[V]$ similarly to what was done for $mathcalO(V)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
$endgroup$
– the man
Mar 31 at 1:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For (1) you are completely correct.
For (2), the idea is that the statement is meant to define the action on all of $mathcalO(V)$, so the part about restriction to $V^*$ seems to be an error (since you are correct that the action was originally just defined on $V^*$).
For (3), $mathbbC[V]$ refers to the polynomial ring in $n$ variables where $n$ is the dimension of $V$, with the variables identified with a basis of $V$. But writing is like that means we don't need to pick a basis, which can have some advantages.
The main idea is that any representation on $V$ can be extended to $mathbbC[V]$ similarly to what was done for $mathcalO(V)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
$endgroup$
– the man
Mar 31 at 1:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For (1) you are completely correct.
For (2), the idea is that the statement is meant to define the action on all of $mathcalO(V)$, so the part about restriction to $V^*$ seems to be an error (since you are correct that the action was originally just defined on $V^*$).
For (3), $mathbbC[V]$ refers to the polynomial ring in $n$ variables where $n$ is the dimension of $V$, with the variables identified with a basis of $V$. But writing is like that means we don't need to pick a basis, which can have some advantages.
The main idea is that any representation on $V$ can be extended to $mathbbC[V]$ similarly to what was done for $mathcalO(V)$.
$endgroup$
For (1) you are completely correct.
For (2), the idea is that the statement is meant to define the action on all of $mathcalO(V)$, so the part about restriction to $V^*$ seems to be an error (since you are correct that the action was originally just defined on $V^*$).
For (3), $mathbbC[V]$ refers to the polynomial ring in $n$ variables where $n$ is the dimension of $V$, with the variables identified with a basis of $V$. But writing is like that means we don't need to pick a basis, which can have some advantages.
The main idea is that any representation on $V$ can be extended to $mathbbC[V]$ similarly to what was done for $mathcalO(V)$.
answered Mar 30 at 19:56
Tobias KildetoftTobias Kildetoft
16.9k14274
16.9k14274
$begingroup$
The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
$endgroup$
– the man
Mar 31 at 1:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
$endgroup$
– the man
Mar 31 at 1:12
$begingroup$
The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
$endgroup$
– the man
Mar 31 at 1:12
$begingroup$
The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
$endgroup$
– the man
Mar 31 at 1:12
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168533%2frepresentation-of-v-and-polynomial-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown