Representation of $V$ and polynomial rings The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIs the dual representation of an irreducible representation always irreducible?Is every linear representation of a group $G$ on $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ a dual representation?Equivalence of induced representationQuick question about formal definition of a representationDual space isomorphism and the dual representationPrimitive action vs. irreducible representationSymmetric polynomials in quotient of polynomial rings.Right-action representation definition, equivalence with left action repEquivalent representation definitionsGroup representation preserving finitely many generators

Return to UK after being refused entry years previously

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?

Why can Shazam fly?

How to manage monthly salary

What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?

Is a "Democratic" Oligarchy-Style System Possible?

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Do these rules for Critical Successes and Critical Failures seem Fair?

Earliest use of the term "Galois extension"?

Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?

Worn-tile Scrabble

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?

Why do we hear so much about the Trump administration deciding to impose and then remove tariffs?

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Geography at the pixel level

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Who coined the term "madman theory"?



Representation of $V$ and polynomial rings



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIs the dual representation of an irreducible representation always irreducible?Is every linear representation of a group $G$ on $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ a dual representation?Equivalence of induced representationQuick question about formal definition of a representationDual space isomorphism and the dual representationPrimitive action vs. irreducible representationSymmetric polynomials in quotient of polynomial rings.Right-action representation definition, equivalence with left action repEquivalent representation definitionsGroup representation preserving finitely many generators










1












$begingroup$


Let $V$ be a complex vector space. Let $G$ be a finite group and let $$rho: G rightarrow GL(V)$$ be a representation of $G$.



Let $V^*$ denote the dual space of $V$, and let $mathcalO(V)$ denote the algebra of functions $F: V rightarrow mathbbC$ generated by the elements of $V^*$. Elements of $mathcalO(V)$ are called regular functions.



The dual representation $rho^*: G rightarrow GL(V^*)$ is given by $$(rho^*(g)f)(v) = f(rho(g)^-1v), forall g in G, f in V^*, v in V$$



Define the ring of invariant functions to be $$mathcalO(V)^G = f in mathcalO(V) : gf = f hspace2mm forall g in G$$
where $gf$ is just shorthand for $rho^*(g)f$.



Now, when we restrict to $V^* subset mathcalO(V)$, where $V^*$ has basis $x_1,...,x_n$, the regular functions are polynomials in the $x_i$ and the action of $G$ is given by $$gp(x_1,...,x_n) = p(gx_1,...,gx_n)$$ for some polynomial $p$.



$(1)$ - I don't understand this last bit? What is the distinction between $V^*$ and $mathcalO(V)$? Is $V^*$ just the set of $mathbbC$-linear sums of $x_1,...,x_n$? There is no multiplication between the $x_i$ defined? And an element of $mathcalO(V)$ is of the form $p(x_1,...,x_n)$ for any polynomial $p$ with complex coefficients(as multiplication is defined here)?



$(2)$ - What does restrict to $V^*$ mean? Does it mean to restrict the action of $G$ to $V^*$? I thought the action was only defined on $V^*$ to begin with?



$(3)$ - Also, when something like $mathbbC[V]$ is written in this context, what does this mean? What does $G$ acting on $mathbbC[V]$ mean?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $V$ be a complex vector space. Let $G$ be a finite group and let $$rho: G rightarrow GL(V)$$ be a representation of $G$.



    Let $V^*$ denote the dual space of $V$, and let $mathcalO(V)$ denote the algebra of functions $F: V rightarrow mathbbC$ generated by the elements of $V^*$. Elements of $mathcalO(V)$ are called regular functions.



    The dual representation $rho^*: G rightarrow GL(V^*)$ is given by $$(rho^*(g)f)(v) = f(rho(g)^-1v), forall g in G, f in V^*, v in V$$



    Define the ring of invariant functions to be $$mathcalO(V)^G = f in mathcalO(V) : gf = f hspace2mm forall g in G$$
    where $gf$ is just shorthand for $rho^*(g)f$.



    Now, when we restrict to $V^* subset mathcalO(V)$, where $V^*$ has basis $x_1,...,x_n$, the regular functions are polynomials in the $x_i$ and the action of $G$ is given by $$gp(x_1,...,x_n) = p(gx_1,...,gx_n)$$ for some polynomial $p$.



    $(1)$ - I don't understand this last bit? What is the distinction between $V^*$ and $mathcalO(V)$? Is $V^*$ just the set of $mathbbC$-linear sums of $x_1,...,x_n$? There is no multiplication between the $x_i$ defined? And an element of $mathcalO(V)$ is of the form $p(x_1,...,x_n)$ for any polynomial $p$ with complex coefficients(as multiplication is defined here)?



    $(2)$ - What does restrict to $V^*$ mean? Does it mean to restrict the action of $G$ to $V^*$? I thought the action was only defined on $V^*$ to begin with?



    $(3)$ - Also, when something like $mathbbC[V]$ is written in this context, what does this mean? What does $G$ acting on $mathbbC[V]$ mean?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $V$ be a complex vector space. Let $G$ be a finite group and let $$rho: G rightarrow GL(V)$$ be a representation of $G$.



      Let $V^*$ denote the dual space of $V$, and let $mathcalO(V)$ denote the algebra of functions $F: V rightarrow mathbbC$ generated by the elements of $V^*$. Elements of $mathcalO(V)$ are called regular functions.



      The dual representation $rho^*: G rightarrow GL(V^*)$ is given by $$(rho^*(g)f)(v) = f(rho(g)^-1v), forall g in G, f in V^*, v in V$$



      Define the ring of invariant functions to be $$mathcalO(V)^G = f in mathcalO(V) : gf = f hspace2mm forall g in G$$
      where $gf$ is just shorthand for $rho^*(g)f$.



      Now, when we restrict to $V^* subset mathcalO(V)$, where $V^*$ has basis $x_1,...,x_n$, the regular functions are polynomials in the $x_i$ and the action of $G$ is given by $$gp(x_1,...,x_n) = p(gx_1,...,gx_n)$$ for some polynomial $p$.



      $(1)$ - I don't understand this last bit? What is the distinction between $V^*$ and $mathcalO(V)$? Is $V^*$ just the set of $mathbbC$-linear sums of $x_1,...,x_n$? There is no multiplication between the $x_i$ defined? And an element of $mathcalO(V)$ is of the form $p(x_1,...,x_n)$ for any polynomial $p$ with complex coefficients(as multiplication is defined here)?



      $(2)$ - What does restrict to $V^*$ mean? Does it mean to restrict the action of $G$ to $V^*$? I thought the action was only defined on $V^*$ to begin with?



      $(3)$ - Also, when something like $mathbbC[V]$ is written in this context, what does this mean? What does $G$ acting on $mathbbC[V]$ mean?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $V$ be a complex vector space. Let $G$ be a finite group and let $$rho: G rightarrow GL(V)$$ be a representation of $G$.



      Let $V^*$ denote the dual space of $V$, and let $mathcalO(V)$ denote the algebra of functions $F: V rightarrow mathbbC$ generated by the elements of $V^*$. Elements of $mathcalO(V)$ are called regular functions.



      The dual representation $rho^*: G rightarrow GL(V^*)$ is given by $$(rho^*(g)f)(v) = f(rho(g)^-1v), forall g in G, f in V^*, v in V$$



      Define the ring of invariant functions to be $$mathcalO(V)^G = f in mathcalO(V) : gf = f hspace2mm forall g in G$$
      where $gf$ is just shorthand for $rho^*(g)f$.



      Now, when we restrict to $V^* subset mathcalO(V)$, where $V^*$ has basis $x_1,...,x_n$, the regular functions are polynomials in the $x_i$ and the action of $G$ is given by $$gp(x_1,...,x_n) = p(gx_1,...,gx_n)$$ for some polynomial $p$.



      $(1)$ - I don't understand this last bit? What is the distinction between $V^*$ and $mathcalO(V)$? Is $V^*$ just the set of $mathbbC$-linear sums of $x_1,...,x_n$? There is no multiplication between the $x_i$ defined? And an element of $mathcalO(V)$ is of the form $p(x_1,...,x_n)$ for any polynomial $p$ with complex coefficients(as multiplication is defined here)?



      $(2)$ - What does restrict to $V^*$ mean? Does it mean to restrict the action of $G$ to $V^*$? I thought the action was only defined on $V^*$ to begin with?



      $(3)$ - Also, when something like $mathbbC[V]$ is written in this context, what does this mean? What does $G$ acting on $mathbbC[V]$ mean?







      linear-algebra abstract-algebra vector-spaces representation-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 30 at 17:09









      the manthe man

      831716




      831716




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          For (1) you are completely correct.



          For (2), the idea is that the statement is meant to define the action on all of $mathcalO(V)$, so the part about restriction to $V^*$ seems to be an error (since you are correct that the action was originally just defined on $V^*$).



          For (3), $mathbbC[V]$ refers to the polynomial ring in $n$ variables where $n$ is the dimension of $V$, with the variables identified with a basis of $V$. But writing is like that means we don't need to pick a basis, which can have some advantages.

          The main idea is that any representation on $V$ can be extended to $mathbbC[V]$ similarly to what was done for $mathcalO(V)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
            $endgroup$
            – the man
            Mar 31 at 1:12











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168533%2frepresentation-of-v-and-polynomial-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          For (1) you are completely correct.



          For (2), the idea is that the statement is meant to define the action on all of $mathcalO(V)$, so the part about restriction to $V^*$ seems to be an error (since you are correct that the action was originally just defined on $V^*$).



          For (3), $mathbbC[V]$ refers to the polynomial ring in $n$ variables where $n$ is the dimension of $V$, with the variables identified with a basis of $V$. But writing is like that means we don't need to pick a basis, which can have some advantages.

          The main idea is that any representation on $V$ can be extended to $mathbbC[V]$ similarly to what was done for $mathcalO(V)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
            $endgroup$
            – the man
            Mar 31 at 1:12















          1












          $begingroup$

          For (1) you are completely correct.



          For (2), the idea is that the statement is meant to define the action on all of $mathcalO(V)$, so the part about restriction to $V^*$ seems to be an error (since you are correct that the action was originally just defined on $V^*$).



          For (3), $mathbbC[V]$ refers to the polynomial ring in $n$ variables where $n$ is the dimension of $V$, with the variables identified with a basis of $V$. But writing is like that means we don't need to pick a basis, which can have some advantages.

          The main idea is that any representation on $V$ can be extended to $mathbbC[V]$ similarly to what was done for $mathcalO(V)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
            $endgroup$
            – the man
            Mar 31 at 1:12













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          For (1) you are completely correct.



          For (2), the idea is that the statement is meant to define the action on all of $mathcalO(V)$, so the part about restriction to $V^*$ seems to be an error (since you are correct that the action was originally just defined on $V^*$).



          For (3), $mathbbC[V]$ refers to the polynomial ring in $n$ variables where $n$ is the dimension of $V$, with the variables identified with a basis of $V$. But writing is like that means we don't need to pick a basis, which can have some advantages.

          The main idea is that any representation on $V$ can be extended to $mathbbC[V]$ similarly to what was done for $mathcalO(V)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          For (1) you are completely correct.



          For (2), the idea is that the statement is meant to define the action on all of $mathcalO(V)$, so the part about restriction to $V^*$ seems to be an error (since you are correct that the action was originally just defined on $V^*$).



          For (3), $mathbbC[V]$ refers to the polynomial ring in $n$ variables where $n$ is the dimension of $V$, with the variables identified with a basis of $V$. But writing is like that means we don't need to pick a basis, which can have some advantages.

          The main idea is that any representation on $V$ can be extended to $mathbbC[V]$ similarly to what was done for $mathcalO(V)$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 30 at 19:56









          Tobias KildetoftTobias Kildetoft

          16.9k14274




          16.9k14274











          • $begingroup$
            The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
            $endgroup$
            – the man
            Mar 31 at 1:12
















          • $begingroup$
            The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
            $endgroup$
            – the man
            Mar 31 at 1:12















          $begingroup$
          The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
          $endgroup$
          – the man
          Mar 31 at 1:12




          $begingroup$
          The action was defined on $V^*$, so how would the group act on $mathcalO(V)$? Also, how exactly is this representaion extended to $mathbbC[V]$?
          $endgroup$
          – the man
          Mar 31 at 1:12

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168533%2frepresentation-of-v-and-polynomial-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

          Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

          Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire