Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?How dense are Saturn's rings?Will Saturn's rings become a moon?How to see Saturn's rings through a pair of binoculars?Recent origin of Saturn's ringsTrying to understand the way Saturn's ring look in this famous Cassini imageWhat are the periods of Saturn's rings?How old are Janus and Epimetheus?How would humans with appropriate equipment navigate the surface of Saturn's moon Titan on foot?Which Saturn satellite passes closest to Saturn's rings and at what distance?What is the organic material in Saturn's rings?
When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?
Codimension of non-flat locus
How to format long polynomial?
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
Modeling an IP Address
Could an aircraft fly or hover using only jets of compressed air?
How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?
Arrow those variables!
How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?
"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it
Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?
Why can't I see bouncing of switch on oscilloscope screen?
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
infared filters v nd
Add text to same line using sed
Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?
Can you really stack all of this on an Opportunity Attack?
Does detail obscure or enhance action?
Cross compiling for RPi - error while loading shared libraries
How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
Today is the Center
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
Horror movie about a virus at the prom; beginning and end are stylized as a cartoon
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
How dense are Saturn's rings?Will Saturn's rings become a moon?How to see Saturn's rings through a pair of binoculars?Recent origin of Saturn's ringsTrying to understand the way Saturn's ring look in this famous Cassini imageWhat are the periods of Saturn's rings?How old are Janus and Epimetheus?How would humans with appropriate equipment navigate the surface of Saturn's moon Titan on foot?Which Saturn satellite passes closest to Saturn's rings and at what distance?What is the organic material in Saturn's rings?
$begingroup$
The NY Times article Saturn’s Rings Are Sculpted by a Crew of Mini-Moons is really interesting and links to the recent paywalled paper in Science Close Cassini flybys of Saturn’s ring moons Pan, Daphnis, Atlas, Pandora, and Epimetheus
But I absolutely can't understand one of the photos in the NY Times article, shown below. Titan seems to be...
behind Saturn's rings, and yet it is
huge relative the spacing of the rings, and yet it- appears to be out of focus while the rings and Epimetheus are in focus.
Can someone help me understand how all of these can be true at the same time?
In the foreground, the moon Epimetheus appearing to hover above Saturn's rings. Epimetheus is dwarfed by Titan in the background.CreditNASA/JPL/Space Science Institute
photography saturn cassini saturn-rings
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The NY Times article Saturn’s Rings Are Sculpted by a Crew of Mini-Moons is really interesting and links to the recent paywalled paper in Science Close Cassini flybys of Saturn’s ring moons Pan, Daphnis, Atlas, Pandora, and Epimetheus
But I absolutely can't understand one of the photos in the NY Times article, shown below. Titan seems to be...
behind Saturn's rings, and yet it is
huge relative the spacing of the rings, and yet it- appears to be out of focus while the rings and Epimetheus are in focus.
Can someone help me understand how all of these can be true at the same time?
In the foreground, the moon Epimetheus appearing to hover above Saturn's rings. Epimetheus is dwarfed by Titan in the background.CreditNASA/JPL/Space Science Institute
photography saturn cassini saturn-rings
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Something that might contribute to this illusion is the extremely narrow angle used. I know Titan is much farther away than the rings, so I intuitively expect it to look much smaller than it is, so it looks enormous in this picture. Because the focal length of the camera is so high, Titan isn't actually that much bigger than it appears.
$endgroup$
– DarthFennec
Mar 30 at 0:05
1
$begingroup$
@DarthFennec yes, the 2nd link in this comment shows that the FOV for this photo is only about 0.35 degrees.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 30 at 0:30
2
$begingroup$
How are the rings so thin if the moons appear to have vastly different inclinations? That's what looks strange to me.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Mar 30 at 20:55
1
$begingroup$
Beautiful, stunning image. In case you haven't seen it I would like to recommend Carolyn Porco's classic TED talk about Cassini. It's well worth watching; she puts things in perspective ;-).
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Mar 31 at 17:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The NY Times article Saturn’s Rings Are Sculpted by a Crew of Mini-Moons is really interesting and links to the recent paywalled paper in Science Close Cassini flybys of Saturn’s ring moons Pan, Daphnis, Atlas, Pandora, and Epimetheus
But I absolutely can't understand one of the photos in the NY Times article, shown below. Titan seems to be...
behind Saturn's rings, and yet it is
huge relative the spacing of the rings, and yet it- appears to be out of focus while the rings and Epimetheus are in focus.
Can someone help me understand how all of these can be true at the same time?
In the foreground, the moon Epimetheus appearing to hover above Saturn's rings. Epimetheus is dwarfed by Titan in the background.CreditNASA/JPL/Space Science Institute
photography saturn cassini saturn-rings
$endgroup$
The NY Times article Saturn’s Rings Are Sculpted by a Crew of Mini-Moons is really interesting and links to the recent paywalled paper in Science Close Cassini flybys of Saturn’s ring moons Pan, Daphnis, Atlas, Pandora, and Epimetheus
But I absolutely can't understand one of the photos in the NY Times article, shown below. Titan seems to be...
behind Saturn's rings, and yet it is
huge relative the spacing of the rings, and yet it- appears to be out of focus while the rings and Epimetheus are in focus.
Can someone help me understand how all of these can be true at the same time?
In the foreground, the moon Epimetheus appearing to hover above Saturn's rings. Epimetheus is dwarfed by Titan in the background.CreditNASA/JPL/Space Science Institute
photography saturn cassini saturn-rings
photography saturn cassini saturn-rings
edited Mar 29 at 9:05
uhoh
asked Mar 29 at 6:50
uhohuhoh
6,98022173
6,98022173
2
$begingroup$
Something that might contribute to this illusion is the extremely narrow angle used. I know Titan is much farther away than the rings, so I intuitively expect it to look much smaller than it is, so it looks enormous in this picture. Because the focal length of the camera is so high, Titan isn't actually that much bigger than it appears.
$endgroup$
– DarthFennec
Mar 30 at 0:05
1
$begingroup$
@DarthFennec yes, the 2nd link in this comment shows that the FOV for this photo is only about 0.35 degrees.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 30 at 0:30
2
$begingroup$
How are the rings so thin if the moons appear to have vastly different inclinations? That's what looks strange to me.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Mar 30 at 20:55
1
$begingroup$
Beautiful, stunning image. In case you haven't seen it I would like to recommend Carolyn Porco's classic TED talk about Cassini. It's well worth watching; she puts things in perspective ;-).
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Mar 31 at 17:43
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Something that might contribute to this illusion is the extremely narrow angle used. I know Titan is much farther away than the rings, so I intuitively expect it to look much smaller than it is, so it looks enormous in this picture. Because the focal length of the camera is so high, Titan isn't actually that much bigger than it appears.
$endgroup$
– DarthFennec
Mar 30 at 0:05
1
$begingroup$
@DarthFennec yes, the 2nd link in this comment shows that the FOV for this photo is only about 0.35 degrees.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 30 at 0:30
2
$begingroup$
How are the rings so thin if the moons appear to have vastly different inclinations? That's what looks strange to me.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Mar 30 at 20:55
1
$begingroup$
Beautiful, stunning image. In case you haven't seen it I would like to recommend Carolyn Porco's classic TED talk about Cassini. It's well worth watching; she puts things in perspective ;-).
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Mar 31 at 17:43
2
2
$begingroup$
Something that might contribute to this illusion is the extremely narrow angle used. I know Titan is much farther away than the rings, so I intuitively expect it to look much smaller than it is, so it looks enormous in this picture. Because the focal length of the camera is so high, Titan isn't actually that much bigger than it appears.
$endgroup$
– DarthFennec
Mar 30 at 0:05
$begingroup$
Something that might contribute to this illusion is the extremely narrow angle used. I know Titan is much farther away than the rings, so I intuitively expect it to look much smaller than it is, so it looks enormous in this picture. Because the focal length of the camera is so high, Titan isn't actually that much bigger than it appears.
$endgroup$
– DarthFennec
Mar 30 at 0:05
1
1
$begingroup$
@DarthFennec yes, the 2nd link in this comment shows that the FOV for this photo is only about 0.35 degrees.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 30 at 0:30
$begingroup$
@DarthFennec yes, the 2nd link in this comment shows that the FOV for this photo is only about 0.35 degrees.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 30 at 0:30
2
2
$begingroup$
How are the rings so thin if the moons appear to have vastly different inclinations? That's what looks strange to me.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Mar 30 at 20:55
$begingroup$
How are the rings so thin if the moons appear to have vastly different inclinations? That's what looks strange to me.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Mar 30 at 20:55
1
1
$begingroup$
Beautiful, stunning image. In case you haven't seen it I would like to recommend Carolyn Porco's classic TED talk about Cassini. It's well worth watching; she puts things in perspective ;-).
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Mar 31 at 17:43
$begingroup$
Beautiful, stunning image. In case you haven't seen it I would like to recommend Carolyn Porco's classic TED talk about Cassini. It's well worth watching; she puts things in perspective ;-).
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Mar 31 at 17:43
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The JPL Solar System Simulator doesn't show Epimetheus but does show Titan behind the Encke gap at 2006-04-28 08:12 UTC.
The simulated surface texture is probably composed of
VIMS images
in infrared wavelengths where Titan's atmosphere is relatively transparent.
On the real Titan, haze scatters visible light so strongly that the surface is indistinct and the edge looks fuzzy.
If we zoom out, we see that we are looking near the outer edge of the rings at a very shallow angle.
This is why they cover less than half of Titan's 10-arcminute apparent diameter.
Since Epimetheus appears above the rings while we are looking from below, it must be in front of them.
Simulated images courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Wow I had no idea that JPL had such a Solar System Simulator website. These are quit helpful, thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 22:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This NASA page says this photo was taken on April 28 2006.
Using Celestia, I managed to find the picture from Cassini that best lines up with the photo. It doesn't match up precisely, but that's to be expected as the calculated orbital elements of all these moons (and cassini) in the software won't necessarily match up to reality precisely.
Below is the zoomed out version of this shot. You can see Titan in the centre and Epimetheus as a dot on top.
And here is the top down shot from Cassini to the moons. Circled are Epimetheus and Titan.
So to answer your question: Titan is really big compared to epimetheus (about 50x), Titan has an atmosphere and so appears fuzzy (It is actually in focus, everything in space is very far away and so is effectively at infinity for focusing purposes), and the rings are highly oblique, so you only see a small slice of them.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice, but we're only half-way there. I've added a cropped version and drawn a rectangle that highlights the rings being almost 40% wider near the left limb of Titan than the right limb. Are you able to adjust the POV of your simulation and make this happen as well? Right now the section of the rings you're showing is so small that there's no slope.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:08
$begingroup$
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08391 and ciclops.org/iss/iss.php?js=1
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:16
1
$begingroup$
It's not about the POV, it's about the accuracy of the orbital data in Celestia. There were two conjunctions of epimetheus and Titan on april 28, 2006 from the view of titan, one too early (the one pictured) and one too late (the rings were no longer in view). AFAIK, Celestia does use a database of precise orbital information rather than just using keplerian ellipses, but I guess even that isn't accurate enough to recreate this photo (saturn's moons have very complex orbits). If anybody has other software that tracks these objects with more precision, they're welcome to post an updated answer.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 9:28
$begingroup$
I did a quick plot . It looks like the distances only match up around08:30 UTC
. I have a hunch that through the tiny 0.35 degree FOV of the narrow-angle camera we're looking at the very outer edge of an inner ring, which is why it's getting narrow so rapidly.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:46
2
$begingroup$
I should have remembered. Epimetheus has a [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_orbit](horseshoe orbit). That's presumably why it's so inaccurate.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 20:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
note: This is a supplemental answer adding some details to @ Ingolifs' excellent answer.
At roughly 2006-Apr-28 08:30 UTC
Cassini was both 1,800,000 km from Titan and 667,000 km from Epimetheus at the same time.
I used JPL's Horizons and saved the positions in the Saturn body centered coordinates every 5 minutes then ran the python script below to plot. I am not sure how to get the plane of the rings this way easily.
class Body(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
fnames = ['Titan photo Cassini horizons_results.txt',
'Titan photo Titan horizons_results.txt',
'Titan photo Epimetheus horizons_results.txt' ]
names = ['Cassini', 'Titan', 'Epimetheus']
bodies = []
for name, fname in zip(names, fnames):
with open(fname, 'r') as infile:
lines = infile.read().splitlines()
iSOE = [i for i, line in enumerate(lines) if "$$SOE" in line][0]
iEOE = [i for i, line in enumerate(lines) if "$$EOE" in line][0]
print iSOE, iEOE, lines[iSOE], lines[iEOE]
lines = zip(*[line.split(',') for line in lines[iSOE+1:iEOE]])
JD = np.array([float(x) for x in lines[0]])
pos = np.array([[float(x) for x in lines[i]] for i in 2, 3, 4])
vel = np.array([[float(x) for x in lines[i]] for i in 5, 6, 7])
body = Body(name)
bodies.append(body)
body.JD = JD
body.pos = pos
body.vel = vel
Cassini, Titan, Epimetheus = bodies
r_Titan = np.sqrt(((Cassini.pos - Titan.pos )**2).sum(axis=0))
r_Epimetheus = np.sqrt(((Cassini.pos - Epimetheus.pos)**2).sum(axis=0))
hours = 24 * (JD - JD[0])
r_Titan_target = 1.8E+06
r_Epimetheus_target = 6.67E+05
hours_Titan = hours[np.argmax(r_Titan < r_Titan_target)]
hours_Epimetheus = hours[np.argmax(r_Epimetheus[30:] > r_Epimetheus_target)+30]
print hours_Titan, hours_Epimetheus
if True:
fig = plt.figure()
plt.subplot(2, 1, 1)
plt.plot(hours, r_Titan)
plt.plot(hours, 1.8E+06 * np.ones_like(r_Titan), '-k')
plt.ylabel('Cassini-Titan distance (km)', fontsize=16)
plt.subplot(2, 1, 2)
plt.plot(hours, r_Epimetheus)
plt.plot(hours, 6.67E+05 * np.ones_like(r_Epimetheus), '-k')
plt.ylabel('Cassini-Epimetheus distance (km)', fontsize=16)
plt.xlabel('2006-Apr-28 hours', fontsize=16)
plt.show()
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If I set observer location to Epimetheus, then Titan and Cassini have opposite RA at 08:13 UTC. Solar System Simulator matches the image at 08:12.
$endgroup$
– Mike G
Mar 29 at 10:30
$begingroup$
@MikeG that's good news! Can you add an answer with a screen shot?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 10:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "514"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30162%2fhelp-understanding-this-unsettling-image-of-titan-epimetheus-and-saturns-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The JPL Solar System Simulator doesn't show Epimetheus but does show Titan behind the Encke gap at 2006-04-28 08:12 UTC.
The simulated surface texture is probably composed of
VIMS images
in infrared wavelengths where Titan's atmosphere is relatively transparent.
On the real Titan, haze scatters visible light so strongly that the surface is indistinct and the edge looks fuzzy.
If we zoom out, we see that we are looking near the outer edge of the rings at a very shallow angle.
This is why they cover less than half of Titan's 10-arcminute apparent diameter.
Since Epimetheus appears above the rings while we are looking from below, it must be in front of them.
Simulated images courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Wow I had no idea that JPL had such a Solar System Simulator website. These are quit helpful, thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 22:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The JPL Solar System Simulator doesn't show Epimetheus but does show Titan behind the Encke gap at 2006-04-28 08:12 UTC.
The simulated surface texture is probably composed of
VIMS images
in infrared wavelengths where Titan's atmosphere is relatively transparent.
On the real Titan, haze scatters visible light so strongly that the surface is indistinct and the edge looks fuzzy.
If we zoom out, we see that we are looking near the outer edge of the rings at a very shallow angle.
This is why they cover less than half of Titan's 10-arcminute apparent diameter.
Since Epimetheus appears above the rings while we are looking from below, it must be in front of them.
Simulated images courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Wow I had no idea that JPL had such a Solar System Simulator website. These are quit helpful, thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 22:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The JPL Solar System Simulator doesn't show Epimetheus but does show Titan behind the Encke gap at 2006-04-28 08:12 UTC.
The simulated surface texture is probably composed of
VIMS images
in infrared wavelengths where Titan's atmosphere is relatively transparent.
On the real Titan, haze scatters visible light so strongly that the surface is indistinct and the edge looks fuzzy.
If we zoom out, we see that we are looking near the outer edge of the rings at a very shallow angle.
This is why they cover less than half of Titan's 10-arcminute apparent diameter.
Since Epimetheus appears above the rings while we are looking from below, it must be in front of them.
Simulated images courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech
$endgroup$
The JPL Solar System Simulator doesn't show Epimetheus but does show Titan behind the Encke gap at 2006-04-28 08:12 UTC.
The simulated surface texture is probably composed of
VIMS images
in infrared wavelengths where Titan's atmosphere is relatively transparent.
On the real Titan, haze scatters visible light so strongly that the surface is indistinct and the edge looks fuzzy.
If we zoom out, we see that we are looking near the outer edge of the rings at a very shallow angle.
This is why they cover less than half of Titan's 10-arcminute apparent diameter.
Since Epimetheus appears above the rings while we are looking from below, it must be in front of them.
Simulated images courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech
edited Mar 30 at 13:52
answered Mar 29 at 19:24
Mike GMike G
6,0521627
6,0521627
1
$begingroup$
Wow I had no idea that JPL had such a Solar System Simulator website. These are quit helpful, thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 22:10
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Wow I had no idea that JPL had such a Solar System Simulator website. These are quit helpful, thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 22:10
1
1
$begingroup$
Wow I had no idea that JPL had such a Solar System Simulator website. These are quit helpful, thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 22:10
$begingroup$
Wow I had no idea that JPL had such a Solar System Simulator website. These are quit helpful, thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 22:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This NASA page says this photo was taken on April 28 2006.
Using Celestia, I managed to find the picture from Cassini that best lines up with the photo. It doesn't match up precisely, but that's to be expected as the calculated orbital elements of all these moons (and cassini) in the software won't necessarily match up to reality precisely.
Below is the zoomed out version of this shot. You can see Titan in the centre and Epimetheus as a dot on top.
And here is the top down shot from Cassini to the moons. Circled are Epimetheus and Titan.
So to answer your question: Titan is really big compared to epimetheus (about 50x), Titan has an atmosphere and so appears fuzzy (It is actually in focus, everything in space is very far away and so is effectively at infinity for focusing purposes), and the rings are highly oblique, so you only see a small slice of them.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice, but we're only half-way there. I've added a cropped version and drawn a rectangle that highlights the rings being almost 40% wider near the left limb of Titan than the right limb. Are you able to adjust the POV of your simulation and make this happen as well? Right now the section of the rings you're showing is so small that there's no slope.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:08
$begingroup$
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08391 and ciclops.org/iss/iss.php?js=1
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:16
1
$begingroup$
It's not about the POV, it's about the accuracy of the orbital data in Celestia. There were two conjunctions of epimetheus and Titan on april 28, 2006 from the view of titan, one too early (the one pictured) and one too late (the rings were no longer in view). AFAIK, Celestia does use a database of precise orbital information rather than just using keplerian ellipses, but I guess even that isn't accurate enough to recreate this photo (saturn's moons have very complex orbits). If anybody has other software that tracks these objects with more precision, they're welcome to post an updated answer.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 9:28
$begingroup$
I did a quick plot . It looks like the distances only match up around08:30 UTC
. I have a hunch that through the tiny 0.35 degree FOV of the narrow-angle camera we're looking at the very outer edge of an inner ring, which is why it's getting narrow so rapidly.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:46
2
$begingroup$
I should have remembered. Epimetheus has a [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_orbit](horseshoe orbit). That's presumably why it's so inaccurate.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 20:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This NASA page says this photo was taken on April 28 2006.
Using Celestia, I managed to find the picture from Cassini that best lines up with the photo. It doesn't match up precisely, but that's to be expected as the calculated orbital elements of all these moons (and cassini) in the software won't necessarily match up to reality precisely.
Below is the zoomed out version of this shot. You can see Titan in the centre and Epimetheus as a dot on top.
And here is the top down shot from Cassini to the moons. Circled are Epimetheus and Titan.
So to answer your question: Titan is really big compared to epimetheus (about 50x), Titan has an atmosphere and so appears fuzzy (It is actually in focus, everything in space is very far away and so is effectively at infinity for focusing purposes), and the rings are highly oblique, so you only see a small slice of them.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice, but we're only half-way there. I've added a cropped version and drawn a rectangle that highlights the rings being almost 40% wider near the left limb of Titan than the right limb. Are you able to adjust the POV of your simulation and make this happen as well? Right now the section of the rings you're showing is so small that there's no slope.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:08
$begingroup$
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08391 and ciclops.org/iss/iss.php?js=1
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:16
1
$begingroup$
It's not about the POV, it's about the accuracy of the orbital data in Celestia. There were two conjunctions of epimetheus and Titan on april 28, 2006 from the view of titan, one too early (the one pictured) and one too late (the rings were no longer in view). AFAIK, Celestia does use a database of precise orbital information rather than just using keplerian ellipses, but I guess even that isn't accurate enough to recreate this photo (saturn's moons have very complex orbits). If anybody has other software that tracks these objects with more precision, they're welcome to post an updated answer.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 9:28
$begingroup$
I did a quick plot . It looks like the distances only match up around08:30 UTC
. I have a hunch that through the tiny 0.35 degree FOV of the narrow-angle camera we're looking at the very outer edge of an inner ring, which is why it's getting narrow so rapidly.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:46
2
$begingroup$
I should have remembered. Epimetheus has a [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_orbit](horseshoe orbit). That's presumably why it's so inaccurate.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 20:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This NASA page says this photo was taken on April 28 2006.
Using Celestia, I managed to find the picture from Cassini that best lines up with the photo. It doesn't match up precisely, but that's to be expected as the calculated orbital elements of all these moons (and cassini) in the software won't necessarily match up to reality precisely.
Below is the zoomed out version of this shot. You can see Titan in the centre and Epimetheus as a dot on top.
And here is the top down shot from Cassini to the moons. Circled are Epimetheus and Titan.
So to answer your question: Titan is really big compared to epimetheus (about 50x), Titan has an atmosphere and so appears fuzzy (It is actually in focus, everything in space is very far away and so is effectively at infinity for focusing purposes), and the rings are highly oblique, so you only see a small slice of them.
$endgroup$
This NASA page says this photo was taken on April 28 2006.
Using Celestia, I managed to find the picture from Cassini that best lines up with the photo. It doesn't match up precisely, but that's to be expected as the calculated orbital elements of all these moons (and cassini) in the software won't necessarily match up to reality precisely.
Below is the zoomed out version of this shot. You can see Titan in the centre and Epimetheus as a dot on top.
And here is the top down shot from Cassini to the moons. Circled are Epimetheus and Titan.
So to answer your question: Titan is really big compared to epimetheus (about 50x), Titan has an atmosphere and so appears fuzzy (It is actually in focus, everything in space is very far away and so is effectively at infinity for focusing purposes), and the rings are highly oblique, so you only see a small slice of them.
answered Mar 29 at 8:39
IngolifsIngolifs
1,5251618
1,5251618
$begingroup$
Very nice, but we're only half-way there. I've added a cropped version and drawn a rectangle that highlights the rings being almost 40% wider near the left limb of Titan than the right limb. Are you able to adjust the POV of your simulation and make this happen as well? Right now the section of the rings you're showing is so small that there's no slope.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:08
$begingroup$
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08391 and ciclops.org/iss/iss.php?js=1
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:16
1
$begingroup$
It's not about the POV, it's about the accuracy of the orbital data in Celestia. There were two conjunctions of epimetheus and Titan on april 28, 2006 from the view of titan, one too early (the one pictured) and one too late (the rings were no longer in view). AFAIK, Celestia does use a database of precise orbital information rather than just using keplerian ellipses, but I guess even that isn't accurate enough to recreate this photo (saturn's moons have very complex orbits). If anybody has other software that tracks these objects with more precision, they're welcome to post an updated answer.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 9:28
$begingroup$
I did a quick plot . It looks like the distances only match up around08:30 UTC
. I have a hunch that through the tiny 0.35 degree FOV of the narrow-angle camera we're looking at the very outer edge of an inner ring, which is why it's getting narrow so rapidly.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:46
2
$begingroup$
I should have remembered. Epimetheus has a [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_orbit](horseshoe orbit). That's presumably why it's so inaccurate.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 20:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Very nice, but we're only half-way there. I've added a cropped version and drawn a rectangle that highlights the rings being almost 40% wider near the left limb of Titan than the right limb. Are you able to adjust the POV of your simulation and make this happen as well? Right now the section of the rings you're showing is so small that there's no slope.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:08
$begingroup$
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08391 and ciclops.org/iss/iss.php?js=1
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:16
1
$begingroup$
It's not about the POV, it's about the accuracy of the orbital data in Celestia. There were two conjunctions of epimetheus and Titan on april 28, 2006 from the view of titan, one too early (the one pictured) and one too late (the rings were no longer in view). AFAIK, Celestia does use a database of precise orbital information rather than just using keplerian ellipses, but I guess even that isn't accurate enough to recreate this photo (saturn's moons have very complex orbits). If anybody has other software that tracks these objects with more precision, they're welcome to post an updated answer.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 9:28
$begingroup$
I did a quick plot . It looks like the distances only match up around08:30 UTC
. I have a hunch that through the tiny 0.35 degree FOV of the narrow-angle camera we're looking at the very outer edge of an inner ring, which is why it's getting narrow so rapidly.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:46
2
$begingroup$
I should have remembered. Epimetheus has a [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_orbit](horseshoe orbit). That's presumably why it's so inaccurate.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 20:34
$begingroup$
Very nice, but we're only half-way there. I've added a cropped version and drawn a rectangle that highlights the rings being almost 40% wider near the left limb of Titan than the right limb. Are you able to adjust the POV of your simulation and make this happen as well? Right now the section of the rings you're showing is so small that there's no slope.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:08
$begingroup$
Very nice, but we're only half-way there. I've added a cropped version and drawn a rectangle that highlights the rings being almost 40% wider near the left limb of Titan than the right limb. Are you able to adjust the POV of your simulation and make this happen as well? Right now the section of the rings you're showing is so small that there's no slope.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:08
$begingroup$
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08391 and ciclops.org/iss/iss.php?js=1
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:16
$begingroup$
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08391 and ciclops.org/iss/iss.php?js=1
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:16
1
1
$begingroup$
It's not about the POV, it's about the accuracy of the orbital data in Celestia. There were two conjunctions of epimetheus and Titan on april 28, 2006 from the view of titan, one too early (the one pictured) and one too late (the rings were no longer in view). AFAIK, Celestia does use a database of precise orbital information rather than just using keplerian ellipses, but I guess even that isn't accurate enough to recreate this photo (saturn's moons have very complex orbits). If anybody has other software that tracks these objects with more precision, they're welcome to post an updated answer.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 9:28
$begingroup$
It's not about the POV, it's about the accuracy of the orbital data in Celestia. There were two conjunctions of epimetheus and Titan on april 28, 2006 from the view of titan, one too early (the one pictured) and one too late (the rings were no longer in view). AFAIK, Celestia does use a database of precise orbital information rather than just using keplerian ellipses, but I guess even that isn't accurate enough to recreate this photo (saturn's moons have very complex orbits). If anybody has other software that tracks these objects with more precision, they're welcome to post an updated answer.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 9:28
$begingroup$
I did a quick plot . It looks like the distances only match up around
08:30 UTC
. I have a hunch that through the tiny 0.35 degree FOV of the narrow-angle camera we're looking at the very outer edge of an inner ring, which is why it's getting narrow so rapidly.$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:46
$begingroup$
I did a quick plot . It looks like the distances only match up around
08:30 UTC
. I have a hunch that through the tiny 0.35 degree FOV of the narrow-angle camera we're looking at the very outer edge of an inner ring, which is why it's getting narrow so rapidly.$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 9:46
2
2
$begingroup$
I should have remembered. Epimetheus has a [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_orbit](horseshoe orbit). That's presumably why it's so inaccurate.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 20:34
$begingroup$
I should have remembered. Epimetheus has a [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_orbit](horseshoe orbit). That's presumably why it's so inaccurate.
$endgroup$
– Ingolifs
Mar 29 at 20:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
note: This is a supplemental answer adding some details to @ Ingolifs' excellent answer.
At roughly 2006-Apr-28 08:30 UTC
Cassini was both 1,800,000 km from Titan and 667,000 km from Epimetheus at the same time.
I used JPL's Horizons and saved the positions in the Saturn body centered coordinates every 5 minutes then ran the python script below to plot. I am not sure how to get the plane of the rings this way easily.
class Body(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
fnames = ['Titan photo Cassini horizons_results.txt',
'Titan photo Titan horizons_results.txt',
'Titan photo Epimetheus horizons_results.txt' ]
names = ['Cassini', 'Titan', 'Epimetheus']
bodies = []
for name, fname in zip(names, fnames):
with open(fname, 'r') as infile:
lines = infile.read().splitlines()
iSOE = [i for i, line in enumerate(lines) if "$$SOE" in line][0]
iEOE = [i for i, line in enumerate(lines) if "$$EOE" in line][0]
print iSOE, iEOE, lines[iSOE], lines[iEOE]
lines = zip(*[line.split(',') for line in lines[iSOE+1:iEOE]])
JD = np.array([float(x) for x in lines[0]])
pos = np.array([[float(x) for x in lines[i]] for i in 2, 3, 4])
vel = np.array([[float(x) for x in lines[i]] for i in 5, 6, 7])
body = Body(name)
bodies.append(body)
body.JD = JD
body.pos = pos
body.vel = vel
Cassini, Titan, Epimetheus = bodies
r_Titan = np.sqrt(((Cassini.pos - Titan.pos )**2).sum(axis=0))
r_Epimetheus = np.sqrt(((Cassini.pos - Epimetheus.pos)**2).sum(axis=0))
hours = 24 * (JD - JD[0])
r_Titan_target = 1.8E+06
r_Epimetheus_target = 6.67E+05
hours_Titan = hours[np.argmax(r_Titan < r_Titan_target)]
hours_Epimetheus = hours[np.argmax(r_Epimetheus[30:] > r_Epimetheus_target)+30]
print hours_Titan, hours_Epimetheus
if True:
fig = plt.figure()
plt.subplot(2, 1, 1)
plt.plot(hours, r_Titan)
plt.plot(hours, 1.8E+06 * np.ones_like(r_Titan), '-k')
plt.ylabel('Cassini-Titan distance (km)', fontsize=16)
plt.subplot(2, 1, 2)
plt.plot(hours, r_Epimetheus)
plt.plot(hours, 6.67E+05 * np.ones_like(r_Epimetheus), '-k')
plt.ylabel('Cassini-Epimetheus distance (km)', fontsize=16)
plt.xlabel('2006-Apr-28 hours', fontsize=16)
plt.show()
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If I set observer location to Epimetheus, then Titan and Cassini have opposite RA at 08:13 UTC. Solar System Simulator matches the image at 08:12.
$endgroup$
– Mike G
Mar 29 at 10:30
$begingroup$
@MikeG that's good news! Can you add an answer with a screen shot?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 10:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
note: This is a supplemental answer adding some details to @ Ingolifs' excellent answer.
At roughly 2006-Apr-28 08:30 UTC
Cassini was both 1,800,000 km from Titan and 667,000 km from Epimetheus at the same time.
I used JPL's Horizons and saved the positions in the Saturn body centered coordinates every 5 minutes then ran the python script below to plot. I am not sure how to get the plane of the rings this way easily.
class Body(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
fnames = ['Titan photo Cassini horizons_results.txt',
'Titan photo Titan horizons_results.txt',
'Titan photo Epimetheus horizons_results.txt' ]
names = ['Cassini', 'Titan', 'Epimetheus']
bodies = []
for name, fname in zip(names, fnames):
with open(fname, 'r') as infile:
lines = infile.read().splitlines()
iSOE = [i for i, line in enumerate(lines) if "$$SOE" in line][0]
iEOE = [i for i, line in enumerate(lines) if "$$EOE" in line][0]
print iSOE, iEOE, lines[iSOE], lines[iEOE]
lines = zip(*[line.split(',') for line in lines[iSOE+1:iEOE]])
JD = np.array([float(x) for x in lines[0]])
pos = np.array([[float(x) for x in lines[i]] for i in 2, 3, 4])
vel = np.array([[float(x) for x in lines[i]] for i in 5, 6, 7])
body = Body(name)
bodies.append(body)
body.JD = JD
body.pos = pos
body.vel = vel
Cassini, Titan, Epimetheus = bodies
r_Titan = np.sqrt(((Cassini.pos - Titan.pos )**2).sum(axis=0))
r_Epimetheus = np.sqrt(((Cassini.pos - Epimetheus.pos)**2).sum(axis=0))
hours = 24 * (JD - JD[0])
r_Titan_target = 1.8E+06
r_Epimetheus_target = 6.67E+05
hours_Titan = hours[np.argmax(r_Titan < r_Titan_target)]
hours_Epimetheus = hours[np.argmax(r_Epimetheus[30:] > r_Epimetheus_target)+30]
print hours_Titan, hours_Epimetheus
if True:
fig = plt.figure()
plt.subplot(2, 1, 1)
plt.plot(hours, r_Titan)
plt.plot(hours, 1.8E+06 * np.ones_like(r_Titan), '-k')
plt.ylabel('Cassini-Titan distance (km)', fontsize=16)
plt.subplot(2, 1, 2)
plt.plot(hours, r_Epimetheus)
plt.plot(hours, 6.67E+05 * np.ones_like(r_Epimetheus), '-k')
plt.ylabel('Cassini-Epimetheus distance (km)', fontsize=16)
plt.xlabel('2006-Apr-28 hours', fontsize=16)
plt.show()
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If I set observer location to Epimetheus, then Titan and Cassini have opposite RA at 08:13 UTC. Solar System Simulator matches the image at 08:12.
$endgroup$
– Mike G
Mar 29 at 10:30
$begingroup$
@MikeG that's good news! Can you add an answer with a screen shot?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 10:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
note: This is a supplemental answer adding some details to @ Ingolifs' excellent answer.
At roughly 2006-Apr-28 08:30 UTC
Cassini was both 1,800,000 km from Titan and 667,000 km from Epimetheus at the same time.
I used JPL's Horizons and saved the positions in the Saturn body centered coordinates every 5 minutes then ran the python script below to plot. I am not sure how to get the plane of the rings this way easily.
class Body(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
fnames = ['Titan photo Cassini horizons_results.txt',
'Titan photo Titan horizons_results.txt',
'Titan photo Epimetheus horizons_results.txt' ]
names = ['Cassini', 'Titan', 'Epimetheus']
bodies = []
for name, fname in zip(names, fnames):
with open(fname, 'r') as infile:
lines = infile.read().splitlines()
iSOE = [i for i, line in enumerate(lines) if "$$SOE" in line][0]
iEOE = [i for i, line in enumerate(lines) if "$$EOE" in line][0]
print iSOE, iEOE, lines[iSOE], lines[iEOE]
lines = zip(*[line.split(',') for line in lines[iSOE+1:iEOE]])
JD = np.array([float(x) for x in lines[0]])
pos = np.array([[float(x) for x in lines[i]] for i in 2, 3, 4])
vel = np.array([[float(x) for x in lines[i]] for i in 5, 6, 7])
body = Body(name)
bodies.append(body)
body.JD = JD
body.pos = pos
body.vel = vel
Cassini, Titan, Epimetheus = bodies
r_Titan = np.sqrt(((Cassini.pos - Titan.pos )**2).sum(axis=0))
r_Epimetheus = np.sqrt(((Cassini.pos - Epimetheus.pos)**2).sum(axis=0))
hours = 24 * (JD - JD[0])
r_Titan_target = 1.8E+06
r_Epimetheus_target = 6.67E+05
hours_Titan = hours[np.argmax(r_Titan < r_Titan_target)]
hours_Epimetheus = hours[np.argmax(r_Epimetheus[30:] > r_Epimetheus_target)+30]
print hours_Titan, hours_Epimetheus
if True:
fig = plt.figure()
plt.subplot(2, 1, 1)
plt.plot(hours, r_Titan)
plt.plot(hours, 1.8E+06 * np.ones_like(r_Titan), '-k')
plt.ylabel('Cassini-Titan distance (km)', fontsize=16)
plt.subplot(2, 1, 2)
plt.plot(hours, r_Epimetheus)
plt.plot(hours, 6.67E+05 * np.ones_like(r_Epimetheus), '-k')
plt.ylabel('Cassini-Epimetheus distance (km)', fontsize=16)
plt.xlabel('2006-Apr-28 hours', fontsize=16)
plt.show()
$endgroup$
note: This is a supplemental answer adding some details to @ Ingolifs' excellent answer.
At roughly 2006-Apr-28 08:30 UTC
Cassini was both 1,800,000 km from Titan and 667,000 km from Epimetheus at the same time.
I used JPL's Horizons and saved the positions in the Saturn body centered coordinates every 5 minutes then ran the python script below to plot. I am not sure how to get the plane of the rings this way easily.
class Body(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
fnames = ['Titan photo Cassini horizons_results.txt',
'Titan photo Titan horizons_results.txt',
'Titan photo Epimetheus horizons_results.txt' ]
names = ['Cassini', 'Titan', 'Epimetheus']
bodies = []
for name, fname in zip(names, fnames):
with open(fname, 'r') as infile:
lines = infile.read().splitlines()
iSOE = [i for i, line in enumerate(lines) if "$$SOE" in line][0]
iEOE = [i for i, line in enumerate(lines) if "$$EOE" in line][0]
print iSOE, iEOE, lines[iSOE], lines[iEOE]
lines = zip(*[line.split(',') for line in lines[iSOE+1:iEOE]])
JD = np.array([float(x) for x in lines[0]])
pos = np.array([[float(x) for x in lines[i]] for i in 2, 3, 4])
vel = np.array([[float(x) for x in lines[i]] for i in 5, 6, 7])
body = Body(name)
bodies.append(body)
body.JD = JD
body.pos = pos
body.vel = vel
Cassini, Titan, Epimetheus = bodies
r_Titan = np.sqrt(((Cassini.pos - Titan.pos )**2).sum(axis=0))
r_Epimetheus = np.sqrt(((Cassini.pos - Epimetheus.pos)**2).sum(axis=0))
hours = 24 * (JD - JD[0])
r_Titan_target = 1.8E+06
r_Epimetheus_target = 6.67E+05
hours_Titan = hours[np.argmax(r_Titan < r_Titan_target)]
hours_Epimetheus = hours[np.argmax(r_Epimetheus[30:] > r_Epimetheus_target)+30]
print hours_Titan, hours_Epimetheus
if True:
fig = plt.figure()
plt.subplot(2, 1, 1)
plt.plot(hours, r_Titan)
plt.plot(hours, 1.8E+06 * np.ones_like(r_Titan), '-k')
plt.ylabel('Cassini-Titan distance (km)', fontsize=16)
plt.subplot(2, 1, 2)
plt.plot(hours, r_Epimetheus)
plt.plot(hours, 6.67E+05 * np.ones_like(r_Epimetheus), '-k')
plt.ylabel('Cassini-Epimetheus distance (km)', fontsize=16)
plt.xlabel('2006-Apr-28 hours', fontsize=16)
plt.show()
edited Mar 29 at 9:50
answered Mar 29 at 9:44
uhohuhoh
6,98022173
6,98022173
2
$begingroup$
If I set observer location to Epimetheus, then Titan and Cassini have opposite RA at 08:13 UTC. Solar System Simulator matches the image at 08:12.
$endgroup$
– Mike G
Mar 29 at 10:30
$begingroup$
@MikeG that's good news! Can you add an answer with a screen shot?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 10:36
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
If I set observer location to Epimetheus, then Titan and Cassini have opposite RA at 08:13 UTC. Solar System Simulator matches the image at 08:12.
$endgroup$
– Mike G
Mar 29 at 10:30
$begingroup$
@MikeG that's good news! Can you add an answer with a screen shot?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 10:36
2
2
$begingroup$
If I set observer location to Epimetheus, then Titan and Cassini have opposite RA at 08:13 UTC. Solar System Simulator matches the image at 08:12.
$endgroup$
– Mike G
Mar 29 at 10:30
$begingroup$
If I set observer location to Epimetheus, then Titan and Cassini have opposite RA at 08:13 UTC. Solar System Simulator matches the image at 08:12.
$endgroup$
– Mike G
Mar 29 at 10:30
$begingroup$
@MikeG that's good news! Can you add an answer with a screen shot?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 10:36
$begingroup$
@MikeG that's good news! Can you add an answer with a screen shot?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 29 at 10:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Astronomy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30162%2fhelp-understanding-this-unsettling-image-of-titan-epimetheus-and-saturns-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Something that might contribute to this illusion is the extremely narrow angle used. I know Titan is much farther away than the rings, so I intuitively expect it to look much smaller than it is, so it looks enormous in this picture. Because the focal length of the camera is so high, Titan isn't actually that much bigger than it appears.
$endgroup$
– DarthFennec
Mar 30 at 0:05
1
$begingroup$
@DarthFennec yes, the 2nd link in this comment shows that the FOV for this photo is only about 0.35 degrees.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Mar 30 at 0:30
2
$begingroup$
How are the rings so thin if the moons appear to have vastly different inclinations? That's what looks strange to me.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Mar 30 at 20:55
1
$begingroup$
Beautiful, stunning image. In case you haven't seen it I would like to recommend Carolyn Porco's classic TED talk about Cassini. It's well worth watching; she puts things in perspective ;-).
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Mar 31 at 17:43