Analytical solution to the crossed ladders problemCrossed Ladders ProblemSolution by of nonlinear equationCrossed Ladders ProblemA problem with “Crossed Ladders Theorem”Elliptic limit cycleOn the polynomial formula for determinantsFind all the pairs of complex numbers $boldsymbolz$ and $boldsymbolw$ suchSolution to a 4th order polynomial equation as Stillwell does (1989)Really universal quartic formulaFinding the cube roots of two complex numbers knowing the product of these cube rootsExpressing, in terms of real radicals, the trigonometric functions generated by cubic equations with integer coefficients

How to format long polynomial?

Can you really stack all of this on an Opportunity Attack?

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

Arrow those variables!

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Does detail obscure or enhance action?

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Java Casting: Java 11 throws LambdaConversionException while 1.8 does not

Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX

Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

High voltage LED indicator 40-1000 VDC without additional power supply

Client team has low performances and low technical skills: we always fix their work and now they stop collaborate with us. How to solve?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file

Malformed Address '10.10.21.08/24', must be X.X.X.X/NN or

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?

Unable to deploy metadata from Partner Developer scratch org because of extra fields

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?



Analytical solution to the crossed ladders problem


Crossed Ladders ProblemSolution by of nonlinear equationCrossed Ladders ProblemA problem with “Crossed Ladders Theorem”Elliptic limit cycleOn the polynomial formula for determinantsFind all the pairs of complex numbers $boldsymbolz$ and $boldsymbolw$ suchSolution to a 4th order polynomial equation as Stillwell does (1989)Really universal quartic formulaFinding the cube roots of two complex numbers knowing the product of these cube rootsExpressing, in terms of real radicals, the trigonometric functions generated by cubic equations with integer coefficients













1












$begingroup$


I'm working on an analytical solution to the crossed ladders problem.

The solution is almost done and already useable (see my answer to Crossed Ladders Problem for details).

However I'm left with a problem in the end: depending on which ladder I choose using to calculate $w$, the expression of $w$ seems not to be the same.

Let $left(j,kright)inlbraceleft(1,2right),left(2,1right)rbrace$, $minlbrace1,2,3,4rbrace$, and $ninlbrace-,+rbrace$.

Any quantity with a $j$ or $k$ index below seems to depend on the choice of the ladder while, in all numerical applications I tried, I always have $w_jmn=w_kmn$ with $w_jmn=nsqrtl_k^2-h_jm^2$ and $w_kmn=nsqrtl_j^2-h_km^2$.

This leads to:



beginequation
beginsplit
w_j1+&=fracsqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifracc_jLsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
w_j1-&=frac-sqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifrac-c_jLsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
w_j2+&=fracsqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifracc_jMsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
w_j2-&=frac-sqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifrac-c_jMsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
w_j3+&=fracc_jNsqrtleft6+textifracc_jOsqrtleft6\
w_j3-&=frac-c_jNsqrtleft6+textifrac-c_jOsqrtleft6\
w_j4+&=fracc_jPsqrt6+textifracc_jQsqrt6\
w_j4-&=frac-c_jPsqrt6+textifrac-c_jQsqrt6\
endsplit
notag
endequation



With (again see the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem for all details):



beginequation
beginsplit
R_j8&=6 textsgnleft(3h+R_j2right)sqrthright\
c_jL&=1-left(-1right)^j textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)-left| textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)right|\
c_jM&=1+left(-1right)^j textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)-left| textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)right|\
c_jN&=frac1+ textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7+R_j8right)2\
c_jO&=frac1- textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7+R_j8right)2\
c_jP&=frac1+ textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7-R_j8right)2\
c_jQ&=frac1- textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7-R_j8right)2\
endsplit
notag
endequation



Thus I wonder if it is possible to prove that:



beginequation
beginsplit
R_k8&=R_j8\
c_kL&=c_jL\
c_kM&=c_jM\
endsplit
notag
endequation



$R_k8=R_j8$ would imply $c_kN=c_jN$, $c_kO=c_jO$, $c_kP=c_jP$, and $c_kQ=c_jQ$.

Proving $ textsgnleft(3h+R_k2right)= textsgnleft(3h+R_j2right)$ would be enough to prove all these relations.

For $c_kL=c_jL$ and $c_kM=c_jM$, proving $ textsgnleft(3h-R_k2right)=- textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)$ would be enough.

In my attempts, and when working on the general solution, I came across the following equations, which I write in case they are helpful:



beginequation
beginsplit
R_j1^3&=27c_jA^2R_j1+54c_jC\
R_j2R_j3&=54left(hc_jA+h^3right)\
R_j3&=2sqrtR_j1^2+c_jBR_j1+9c_jA^2-108h^2c_jA+81h^4\
R_6&=fracR_j1^2+6c_jAR_j1-18c_jA^29\
R_7&=frac6hR_j2+R_j32\
R_j8&=2R_j4left(3h+R_j2right)\
R_9&=sqrtleft(c_F+R_7right)^2+R_j5^2left(3h-R_j2right)^2\
R_j1&geq6c_jA-9h^2\
R_k1&=-R_j1\
textsgnleft(R_j1right)&= textsgnleft(c_jAright)\
hc_jA+h^3=0&implies R_j1-c_jB=0\
R_j3&geqleft|R_j1+12c_jA-18h^2right|\
R_j3&geq-6hR_j2\
R_j5=0&implies3h-R_j2=0
endsplit
notag
endequation



Thanks in advance for your answers.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm working on an analytical solution to the crossed ladders problem.

    The solution is almost done and already useable (see my answer to Crossed Ladders Problem for details).

    However I'm left with a problem in the end: depending on which ladder I choose using to calculate $w$, the expression of $w$ seems not to be the same.

    Let $left(j,kright)inlbraceleft(1,2right),left(2,1right)rbrace$, $minlbrace1,2,3,4rbrace$, and $ninlbrace-,+rbrace$.

    Any quantity with a $j$ or $k$ index below seems to depend on the choice of the ladder while, in all numerical applications I tried, I always have $w_jmn=w_kmn$ with $w_jmn=nsqrtl_k^2-h_jm^2$ and $w_kmn=nsqrtl_j^2-h_km^2$.

    This leads to:



    beginequation
    beginsplit
    w_j1+&=fracsqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifracc_jLsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
    w_j1-&=frac-sqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifrac-c_jLsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
    w_j2+&=fracsqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifracc_jMsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
    w_j2-&=frac-sqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifrac-c_jMsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
    w_j3+&=fracc_jNsqrtleft6+textifracc_jOsqrtleft6\
    w_j3-&=frac-c_jNsqrtleft6+textifrac-c_jOsqrtleft6\
    w_j4+&=fracc_jPsqrt6+textifracc_jQsqrt6\
    w_j4-&=frac-c_jPsqrt6+textifrac-c_jQsqrt6\
    endsplit
    notag
    endequation



    With (again see the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem for all details):



    beginequation
    beginsplit
    R_j8&=6 textsgnleft(3h+R_j2right)sqrthright\
    c_jL&=1-left(-1right)^j textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)-left| textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)right|\
    c_jM&=1+left(-1right)^j textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)-left| textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)right|\
    c_jN&=frac1+ textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7+R_j8right)2\
    c_jO&=frac1- textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7+R_j8right)2\
    c_jP&=frac1+ textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7-R_j8right)2\
    c_jQ&=frac1- textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7-R_j8right)2\
    endsplit
    notag
    endequation



    Thus I wonder if it is possible to prove that:



    beginequation
    beginsplit
    R_k8&=R_j8\
    c_kL&=c_jL\
    c_kM&=c_jM\
    endsplit
    notag
    endequation



    $R_k8=R_j8$ would imply $c_kN=c_jN$, $c_kO=c_jO$, $c_kP=c_jP$, and $c_kQ=c_jQ$.

    Proving $ textsgnleft(3h+R_k2right)= textsgnleft(3h+R_j2right)$ would be enough to prove all these relations.

    For $c_kL=c_jL$ and $c_kM=c_jM$, proving $ textsgnleft(3h-R_k2right)=- textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)$ would be enough.

    In my attempts, and when working on the general solution, I came across the following equations, which I write in case they are helpful:



    beginequation
    beginsplit
    R_j1^3&=27c_jA^2R_j1+54c_jC\
    R_j2R_j3&=54left(hc_jA+h^3right)\
    R_j3&=2sqrtR_j1^2+c_jBR_j1+9c_jA^2-108h^2c_jA+81h^4\
    R_6&=fracR_j1^2+6c_jAR_j1-18c_jA^29\
    R_7&=frac6hR_j2+R_j32\
    R_j8&=2R_j4left(3h+R_j2right)\
    R_9&=sqrtleft(c_F+R_7right)^2+R_j5^2left(3h-R_j2right)^2\
    R_j1&geq6c_jA-9h^2\
    R_k1&=-R_j1\
    textsgnleft(R_j1right)&= textsgnleft(c_jAright)\
    hc_jA+h^3=0&implies R_j1-c_jB=0\
    R_j3&geqleft|R_j1+12c_jA-18h^2right|\
    R_j3&geq-6hR_j2\
    R_j5=0&implies3h-R_j2=0
    endsplit
    notag
    endequation



    Thanks in advance for your answers.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm working on an analytical solution to the crossed ladders problem.

      The solution is almost done and already useable (see my answer to Crossed Ladders Problem for details).

      However I'm left with a problem in the end: depending on which ladder I choose using to calculate $w$, the expression of $w$ seems not to be the same.

      Let $left(j,kright)inlbraceleft(1,2right),left(2,1right)rbrace$, $minlbrace1,2,3,4rbrace$, and $ninlbrace-,+rbrace$.

      Any quantity with a $j$ or $k$ index below seems to depend on the choice of the ladder while, in all numerical applications I tried, I always have $w_jmn=w_kmn$ with $w_jmn=nsqrtl_k^2-h_jm^2$ and $w_kmn=nsqrtl_j^2-h_km^2$.

      This leads to:



      beginequation
      beginsplit
      w_j1+&=fracsqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifracc_jLsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
      w_j1-&=frac-sqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifrac-c_jLsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
      w_j2+&=fracsqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifracc_jMsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
      w_j2-&=frac-sqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifrac-c_jMsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
      w_j3+&=fracc_jNsqrtleft6+textifracc_jOsqrtleft6\
      w_j3-&=frac-c_jNsqrtleft6+textifrac-c_jOsqrtleft6\
      w_j4+&=fracc_jPsqrt6+textifracc_jQsqrt6\
      w_j4-&=frac-c_jPsqrt6+textifrac-c_jQsqrt6\
      endsplit
      notag
      endequation



      With (again see the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem for all details):



      beginequation
      beginsplit
      R_j8&=6 textsgnleft(3h+R_j2right)sqrthright\
      c_jL&=1-left(-1right)^j textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)-left| textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)right|\
      c_jM&=1+left(-1right)^j textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)-left| textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)right|\
      c_jN&=frac1+ textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7+R_j8right)2\
      c_jO&=frac1- textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7+R_j8right)2\
      c_jP&=frac1+ textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7-R_j8right)2\
      c_jQ&=frac1- textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7-R_j8right)2\
      endsplit
      notag
      endequation



      Thus I wonder if it is possible to prove that:



      beginequation
      beginsplit
      R_k8&=R_j8\
      c_kL&=c_jL\
      c_kM&=c_jM\
      endsplit
      notag
      endequation



      $R_k8=R_j8$ would imply $c_kN=c_jN$, $c_kO=c_jO$, $c_kP=c_jP$, and $c_kQ=c_jQ$.

      Proving $ textsgnleft(3h+R_k2right)= textsgnleft(3h+R_j2right)$ would be enough to prove all these relations.

      For $c_kL=c_jL$ and $c_kM=c_jM$, proving $ textsgnleft(3h-R_k2right)=- textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)$ would be enough.

      In my attempts, and when working on the general solution, I came across the following equations, which I write in case they are helpful:



      beginequation
      beginsplit
      R_j1^3&=27c_jA^2R_j1+54c_jC\
      R_j2R_j3&=54left(hc_jA+h^3right)\
      R_j3&=2sqrtR_j1^2+c_jBR_j1+9c_jA^2-108h^2c_jA+81h^4\
      R_6&=fracR_j1^2+6c_jAR_j1-18c_jA^29\
      R_7&=frac6hR_j2+R_j32\
      R_j8&=2R_j4left(3h+R_j2right)\
      R_9&=sqrtleft(c_F+R_7right)^2+R_j5^2left(3h-R_j2right)^2\
      R_j1&geq6c_jA-9h^2\
      R_k1&=-R_j1\
      textsgnleft(R_j1right)&= textsgnleft(c_jAright)\
      hc_jA+h^3=0&implies R_j1-c_jB=0\
      R_j3&geqleft|R_j1+12c_jA-18h^2right|\
      R_j3&geq-6hR_j2\
      R_j5=0&implies3h-R_j2=0
      endsplit
      notag
      endequation



      Thanks in advance for your answers.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm working on an analytical solution to the crossed ladders problem.

      The solution is almost done and already useable (see my answer to Crossed Ladders Problem for details).

      However I'm left with a problem in the end: depending on which ladder I choose using to calculate $w$, the expression of $w$ seems not to be the same.

      Let $left(j,kright)inlbraceleft(1,2right),left(2,1right)rbrace$, $minlbrace1,2,3,4rbrace$, and $ninlbrace-,+rbrace$.

      Any quantity with a $j$ or $k$ index below seems to depend on the choice of the ladder while, in all numerical applications I tried, I always have $w_jmn=w_kmn$ with $w_jmn=nsqrtl_k^2-h_jm^2$ and $w_kmn=nsqrtl_j^2-h_km^2$.

      This leads to:



      beginequation
      beginsplit
      w_j1+&=fracsqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifracc_jLsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
      w_j1-&=frac-sqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifrac-c_jLsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
      w_j2+&=fracsqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifracc_jMsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
      w_j2-&=frac-sqrtR_9+R_7+c_F6+textifrac-c_jMsqrtR_9-R_7-c_F6\
      w_j3+&=fracc_jNsqrtleft6+textifracc_jOsqrtleft6\
      w_j3-&=frac-c_jNsqrtleft6+textifrac-c_jOsqrtleft6\
      w_j4+&=fracc_jPsqrt6+textifracc_jQsqrt6\
      w_j4-&=frac-c_jPsqrt6+textifrac-c_jQsqrt6\
      endsplit
      notag
      endequation



      With (again see the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem for all details):



      beginequation
      beginsplit
      R_j8&=6 textsgnleft(3h+R_j2right)sqrthright\
      c_jL&=1-left(-1right)^j textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)-left| textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)right|\
      c_jM&=1+left(-1right)^j textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)-left| textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)right|\
      c_jN&=frac1+ textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7+R_j8right)2\
      c_jO&=frac1- textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7+R_j8right)2\
      c_jP&=frac1+ textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7-R_j8right)2\
      c_jQ&=frac1- textsgnleft(2c_F-2R_7-R_j8right)2\
      endsplit
      notag
      endequation



      Thus I wonder if it is possible to prove that:



      beginequation
      beginsplit
      R_k8&=R_j8\
      c_kL&=c_jL\
      c_kM&=c_jM\
      endsplit
      notag
      endequation



      $R_k8=R_j8$ would imply $c_kN=c_jN$, $c_kO=c_jO$, $c_kP=c_jP$, and $c_kQ=c_jQ$.

      Proving $ textsgnleft(3h+R_k2right)= textsgnleft(3h+R_j2right)$ would be enough to prove all these relations.

      For $c_kL=c_jL$ and $c_kM=c_jM$, proving $ textsgnleft(3h-R_k2right)=- textsgnleft(3h-R_j2right)$ would be enough.

      In my attempts, and when working on the general solution, I came across the following equations, which I write in case they are helpful:



      beginequation
      beginsplit
      R_j1^3&=27c_jA^2R_j1+54c_jC\
      R_j2R_j3&=54left(hc_jA+h^3right)\
      R_j3&=2sqrtR_j1^2+c_jBR_j1+9c_jA^2-108h^2c_jA+81h^4\
      R_6&=fracR_j1^2+6c_jAR_j1-18c_jA^29\
      R_7&=frac6hR_j2+R_j32\
      R_j8&=2R_j4left(3h+R_j2right)\
      R_9&=sqrtleft(c_F+R_7right)^2+R_j5^2left(3h-R_j2right)^2\
      R_j1&geq6c_jA-9h^2\
      R_k1&=-R_j1\
      textsgnleft(R_j1right)&= textsgnleft(c_jAright)\
      hc_jA+h^3=0&implies R_j1-c_jB=0\
      R_j3&geqleft|R_j1+12c_jA-18h^2right|\
      R_j3&geq-6hR_j2\
      R_j5=0&implies3h-R_j2=0
      endsplit
      notag
      endequation



      Thanks in advance for your answers.







      algebra-precalculus geometry polynomials nonlinear-system quartic-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 1 at 14:03







      someone

















      asked Mar 29 at 10:46









      someonesomeone

      77110




      77110




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Here is a proof by counterexample, so there might be a better one.

          The system $left(1right)$ of the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem gives:



          beginequation
          beginsplit
          0&=hleft(h_j+h_kright)-h_jh_k\
          0&=h_j^2-h_k^2+c_jA\
          endsplit
          tag8
          endequation



          Let the real numbers:



          beginequation
          beginsplit
          left(S_j4,S_j5right)&inlbraceleft(-1,0right),left(0,-1right),left(0,1right),left(1,0right)rbrace\
          left(S_k4,S_k5right)&inlbraceleft(-1,0right),left(0,-1right),left(0,1right),left(1,0right)rbrace\
          endsplit
          notag
          endequation



          According to $left(7right)$ of the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem, the general expressions of $h_j$ and $h_k$ are:



          beginequation
          beginsplit
          h_j&=frac3h+left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2+S_j4R_j46+textifracS_j5R_j56\
          h_k&=frac3h+left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2+S_k4R_k46+textifracS_k5R_k56\
          endsplit
          tag9
          endequation



          Combining $left(8right)$ and $left(9right)$:



          beginequation
          beginsplit
          &S_j4R_j4left(3h-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2right)+S_k4R_k4left(3h-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2right)\
          &=S_j4S_k4R_j4R_k4-S_j5S_k5R_j5R_k5+left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_j2R_k2\
          &-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)3hR_j2-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)3hR_k2-27h^2\
          &S_j5R_j5left(3h-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2right)+S_k5R_k5left(3h-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2right)\
          &=S_j4S_k5R_j4R_k5+S_k4S_j5R_k4R_j5\
          &S_j4R_j4left(3h+R_j2right)-S_k4R_k4left(3h+R_k2right)=left(S_k4^2-S_j4^2+S_j5^2-S_k5^2right)R_7\
          &S_j5R_j5left(3h-R_j2right)-S_k5R_k5left(3h-R_k2right)=0\
          endsplit
          notag
          endequation



          Many counterexamples can be found for these equations if $S_k4neq S_j4$ or $S_k5neq S_j5$.

          The one given in Crossed Ladders Problem, $left(h,l_j,l_kright)=left(3,8,10right)$, is one of them.

          Thus:



          beginequation
          beginsplit
          S_k4&=S_j4\
          S_k5&=S_j5\
          endsplit
          notag
          endequation



          Thus each $h_km$ corresponds to each $h_jm$, and thus:



          beginequation
          beginsplit
          R_k8=R_j8&=R_8\
          c_kL=c_jL&=c_L\
          c_kM=c_jM&=c_M\
          w_kmn=w_jmn&=w_mn\
          endsplit
          notag
          endequation






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3166996%2fanalytical-solution-to-the-crossed-ladders-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Here is a proof by counterexample, so there might be a better one.

            The system $left(1right)$ of the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem gives:



            beginequation
            beginsplit
            0&=hleft(h_j+h_kright)-h_jh_k\
            0&=h_j^2-h_k^2+c_jA\
            endsplit
            tag8
            endequation



            Let the real numbers:



            beginequation
            beginsplit
            left(S_j4,S_j5right)&inlbraceleft(-1,0right),left(0,-1right),left(0,1right),left(1,0right)rbrace\
            left(S_k4,S_k5right)&inlbraceleft(-1,0right),left(0,-1right),left(0,1right),left(1,0right)rbrace\
            endsplit
            notag
            endequation



            According to $left(7right)$ of the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem, the general expressions of $h_j$ and $h_k$ are:



            beginequation
            beginsplit
            h_j&=frac3h+left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2+S_j4R_j46+textifracS_j5R_j56\
            h_k&=frac3h+left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2+S_k4R_k46+textifracS_k5R_k56\
            endsplit
            tag9
            endequation



            Combining $left(8right)$ and $left(9right)$:



            beginequation
            beginsplit
            &S_j4R_j4left(3h-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2right)+S_k4R_k4left(3h-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2right)\
            &=S_j4S_k4R_j4R_k4-S_j5S_k5R_j5R_k5+left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_j2R_k2\
            &-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)3hR_j2-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)3hR_k2-27h^2\
            &S_j5R_j5left(3h-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2right)+S_k5R_k5left(3h-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2right)\
            &=S_j4S_k5R_j4R_k5+S_k4S_j5R_k4R_j5\
            &S_j4R_j4left(3h+R_j2right)-S_k4R_k4left(3h+R_k2right)=left(S_k4^2-S_j4^2+S_j5^2-S_k5^2right)R_7\
            &S_j5R_j5left(3h-R_j2right)-S_k5R_k5left(3h-R_k2right)=0\
            endsplit
            notag
            endequation



            Many counterexamples can be found for these equations if $S_k4neq S_j4$ or $S_k5neq S_j5$.

            The one given in Crossed Ladders Problem, $left(h,l_j,l_kright)=left(3,8,10right)$, is one of them.

            Thus:



            beginequation
            beginsplit
            S_k4&=S_j4\
            S_k5&=S_j5\
            endsplit
            notag
            endequation



            Thus each $h_km$ corresponds to each $h_jm$, and thus:



            beginequation
            beginsplit
            R_k8=R_j8&=R_8\
            c_kL=c_jL&=c_L\
            c_kM=c_jM&=c_M\
            w_kmn=w_jmn&=w_mn\
            endsplit
            notag
            endequation






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              Here is a proof by counterexample, so there might be a better one.

              The system $left(1right)$ of the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem gives:



              beginequation
              beginsplit
              0&=hleft(h_j+h_kright)-h_jh_k\
              0&=h_j^2-h_k^2+c_jA\
              endsplit
              tag8
              endequation



              Let the real numbers:



              beginequation
              beginsplit
              left(S_j4,S_j5right)&inlbraceleft(-1,0right),left(0,-1right),left(0,1right),left(1,0right)rbrace\
              left(S_k4,S_k5right)&inlbraceleft(-1,0right),left(0,-1right),left(0,1right),left(1,0right)rbrace\
              endsplit
              notag
              endequation



              According to $left(7right)$ of the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem, the general expressions of $h_j$ and $h_k$ are:



              beginequation
              beginsplit
              h_j&=frac3h+left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2+S_j4R_j46+textifracS_j5R_j56\
              h_k&=frac3h+left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2+S_k4R_k46+textifracS_k5R_k56\
              endsplit
              tag9
              endequation



              Combining $left(8right)$ and $left(9right)$:



              beginequation
              beginsplit
              &S_j4R_j4left(3h-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2right)+S_k4R_k4left(3h-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2right)\
              &=S_j4S_k4R_j4R_k4-S_j5S_k5R_j5R_k5+left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_j2R_k2\
              &-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)3hR_j2-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)3hR_k2-27h^2\
              &S_j5R_j5left(3h-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2right)+S_k5R_k5left(3h-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2right)\
              &=S_j4S_k5R_j4R_k5+S_k4S_j5R_k4R_j5\
              &S_j4R_j4left(3h+R_j2right)-S_k4R_k4left(3h+R_k2right)=left(S_k4^2-S_j4^2+S_j5^2-S_k5^2right)R_7\
              &S_j5R_j5left(3h-R_j2right)-S_k5R_k5left(3h-R_k2right)=0\
              endsplit
              notag
              endequation



              Many counterexamples can be found for these equations if $S_k4neq S_j4$ or $S_k5neq S_j5$.

              The one given in Crossed Ladders Problem, $left(h,l_j,l_kright)=left(3,8,10right)$, is one of them.

              Thus:



              beginequation
              beginsplit
              S_k4&=S_j4\
              S_k5&=S_j5\
              endsplit
              notag
              endequation



              Thus each $h_km$ corresponds to each $h_jm$, and thus:



              beginequation
              beginsplit
              R_k8=R_j8&=R_8\
              c_kL=c_jL&=c_L\
              c_kM=c_jM&=c_M\
              w_kmn=w_jmn&=w_mn\
              endsplit
              notag
              endequation






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Here is a proof by counterexample, so there might be a better one.

                The system $left(1right)$ of the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem gives:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                0&=hleft(h_j+h_kright)-h_jh_k\
                0&=h_j^2-h_k^2+c_jA\
                endsplit
                tag8
                endequation



                Let the real numbers:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                left(S_j4,S_j5right)&inlbraceleft(-1,0right),left(0,-1right),left(0,1right),left(1,0right)rbrace\
                left(S_k4,S_k5right)&inlbraceleft(-1,0right),left(0,-1right),left(0,1right),left(1,0right)rbrace\
                endsplit
                notag
                endequation



                According to $left(7right)$ of the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem, the general expressions of $h_j$ and $h_k$ are:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                h_j&=frac3h+left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2+S_j4R_j46+textifracS_j5R_j56\
                h_k&=frac3h+left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2+S_k4R_k46+textifracS_k5R_k56\
                endsplit
                tag9
                endequation



                Combining $left(8right)$ and $left(9right)$:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                &S_j4R_j4left(3h-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2right)+S_k4R_k4left(3h-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2right)\
                &=S_j4S_k4R_j4R_k4-S_j5S_k5R_j5R_k5+left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_j2R_k2\
                &-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)3hR_j2-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)3hR_k2-27h^2\
                &S_j5R_j5left(3h-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2right)+S_k5R_k5left(3h-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2right)\
                &=S_j4S_k5R_j4R_k5+S_k4S_j5R_k4R_j5\
                &S_j4R_j4left(3h+R_j2right)-S_k4R_k4left(3h+R_k2right)=left(S_k4^2-S_j4^2+S_j5^2-S_k5^2right)R_7\
                &S_j5R_j5left(3h-R_j2right)-S_k5R_k5left(3h-R_k2right)=0\
                endsplit
                notag
                endequation



                Many counterexamples can be found for these equations if $S_k4neq S_j4$ or $S_k5neq S_j5$.

                The one given in Crossed Ladders Problem, $left(h,l_j,l_kright)=left(3,8,10right)$, is one of them.

                Thus:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                S_k4&=S_j4\
                S_k5&=S_j5\
                endsplit
                notag
                endequation



                Thus each $h_km$ corresponds to each $h_jm$, and thus:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                R_k8=R_j8&=R_8\
                c_kL=c_jL&=c_L\
                c_kM=c_jM&=c_M\
                w_kmn=w_jmn&=w_mn\
                endsplit
                notag
                endequation






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Here is a proof by counterexample, so there might be a better one.

                The system $left(1right)$ of the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem gives:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                0&=hleft(h_j+h_kright)-h_jh_k\
                0&=h_j^2-h_k^2+c_jA\
                endsplit
                tag8
                endequation



                Let the real numbers:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                left(S_j4,S_j5right)&inlbraceleft(-1,0right),left(0,-1right),left(0,1right),left(1,0right)rbrace\
                left(S_k4,S_k5right)&inlbraceleft(-1,0right),left(0,-1right),left(0,1right),left(1,0right)rbrace\
                endsplit
                notag
                endequation



                According to $left(7right)$ of the answer to Crossed Ladders Problem, the general expressions of $h_j$ and $h_k$ are:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                h_j&=frac3h+left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2+S_j4R_j46+textifracS_j5R_j56\
                h_k&=frac3h+left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2+S_k4R_k46+textifracS_k5R_k56\
                endsplit
                tag9
                endequation



                Combining $left(8right)$ and $left(9right)$:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                &S_j4R_j4left(3h-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2right)+S_k4R_k4left(3h-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2right)\
                &=S_j4S_k4R_j4R_k4-S_j5S_k5R_j5R_k5+left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_j2R_k2\
                &-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)3hR_j2-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)3hR_k2-27h^2\
                &S_j5R_j5left(3h-left(S_k4^2-S_k5^2right)R_k2right)+S_k5R_k5left(3h-left(S_j4^2-S_j5^2right)R_j2right)\
                &=S_j4S_k5R_j4R_k5+S_k4S_j5R_k4R_j5\
                &S_j4R_j4left(3h+R_j2right)-S_k4R_k4left(3h+R_k2right)=left(S_k4^2-S_j4^2+S_j5^2-S_k5^2right)R_7\
                &S_j5R_j5left(3h-R_j2right)-S_k5R_k5left(3h-R_k2right)=0\
                endsplit
                notag
                endequation



                Many counterexamples can be found for these equations if $S_k4neq S_j4$ or $S_k5neq S_j5$.

                The one given in Crossed Ladders Problem, $left(h,l_j,l_kright)=left(3,8,10right)$, is one of them.

                Thus:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                S_k4&=S_j4\
                S_k5&=S_j5\
                endsplit
                notag
                endequation



                Thus each $h_km$ corresponds to each $h_jm$, and thus:



                beginequation
                beginsplit
                R_k8=R_j8&=R_8\
                c_kL=c_jL&=c_L\
                c_kM=c_jM&=c_M\
                w_kmn=w_jmn&=w_mn\
                endsplit
                notag
                endequation







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 1 at 14:13









                someonesomeone

                77110




                77110



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3166996%2fanalytical-solution-to-the-crossed-ladders-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                    Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                    Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ