A question about complement of a closed subspace of a Banach space Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Example of a closed subspace of a Banach space which is not complemented?Algebraic and topological complements in a Hilbert spaceClosed subspace of Banach spaceFind a closed subspace $M$ and a non-closed subspace $N$ of a Banach space $mathbfB$ such that $Moplus N=mathbfB$If $Moplus N=B$ is a Banach space and $M$ is closed, does that imply that $N$ is closed as well?Is there a non-reflexive Banach space with every proper closed subspace reflexive?Example of a closed subspace of a Banach space which is not complemented?Finding the topological complement of a finite dimensional subspaceIs the complement of a finite dimensional subspace always closed?Every closed separable subspace is complementedIf $E$ is not complemented in $X$, is $E oplus 0$ not complemented in $X oplus Y$?Does there exist a Banach space with no complemented closed subspaces?Closed subspace of Banach spaceBanach space with non-complemented subspaceAn exercise with finite subspace of a Banach Space

Dyck paths with extra diagonals from valleys (Laser construction)

Is it possible to force a specific program to remain in memory after closing it?

Co-worker has annoying ringtone

Lagrange four-squares theorem --- deterministic complexity

Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?

Why can't I install Tomboy in Ubuntu Mate 19.04?

How many time has Arya actually used Needle?

Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?

Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript

What does this say in Elvish?

What initially awakened the Balrog?

What order were files/directories output in dir?

Customizing QGIS plugins

How to report t statistic from R

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network

Sliceness of knots

Drawing spherical mirrors

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?

Converted a Scalar function to a TVF function for parallel execution-Still running in Serial mode

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

What to do with repeated rejections for phd position

What are the discoveries that have been possible with the rejection of positivism?



A question about complement of a closed subspace of a Banach space



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Example of a closed subspace of a Banach space which is not complemented?Algebraic and topological complements in a Hilbert spaceClosed subspace of Banach spaceFind a closed subspace $M$ and a non-closed subspace $N$ of a Banach space $mathbfB$ such that $Moplus N=mathbfB$If $Moplus N=B$ is a Banach space and $M$ is closed, does that imply that $N$ is closed as well?Is there a non-reflexive Banach space with every proper closed subspace reflexive?Example of a closed subspace of a Banach space which is not complemented?Finding the topological complement of a finite dimensional subspaceIs the complement of a finite dimensional subspace always closed?Every closed separable subspace is complementedIf $E$ is not complemented in $X$, is $E oplus 0$ not complemented in $X oplus Y$?Does there exist a Banach space with no complemented closed subspaces?Closed subspace of Banach spaceBanach space with non-complemented subspaceAn exercise with finite subspace of a Banach Space










2












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a Banach space and $M$ be a closed subspace of $X$. Suppose that there exists a subspace $N$ of $X$ such that $X=Moplus N$. Does it imply that $N$ is closed ?



I know that not every closed subspace of a Banach space is complemented (see here). But my question is slightly different from that question. I think the answer is no. But I do not able to construct a counter example.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let $X$ be a Banach space and $M$ be a closed subspace of $X$. Suppose that there exists a subspace $N$ of $X$ such that $X=Moplus N$. Does it imply that $N$ is closed ?



    I know that not every closed subspace of a Banach space is complemented (see here). But my question is slightly different from that question. I think the answer is no. But I do not able to construct a counter example.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $X$ be a Banach space and $M$ be a closed subspace of $X$. Suppose that there exists a subspace $N$ of $X$ such that $X=Moplus N$. Does it imply that $N$ is closed ?



      I know that not every closed subspace of a Banach space is complemented (see here). But my question is slightly different from that question. I think the answer is no. But I do not able to construct a counter example.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $X$ be a Banach space and $M$ be a closed subspace of $X$. Suppose that there exists a subspace $N$ of $X$ such that $X=Moplus N$. Does it imply that $N$ is closed ?



      I know that not every closed subspace of a Banach space is complemented (see here). But my question is slightly different from that question. I think the answer is no. But I do not able to construct a counter example.







      functional-analysis banach-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:20









      Community

      1




      1










      asked Feb 18 '15 at 18:09









      user149418user149418

      1,596517




      1,596517




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Writing $X = M oplus N$ implies that the projection $pi_1: X to M$ is continuous. Then $N = pi^-1(0)$ must be closed.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Without assuming that $N$ is closed, how to prove that $pi_1$ is continuous?
            $endgroup$
            – user149418
            Feb 18 '15 at 18:24










          • $begingroup$
            It's usually part of the definition of $oplus$ in Banach spaces.
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Israel
            Feb 18 '15 at 18:30










          • $begingroup$
            @RobertIsrael: Can you elaborate on how to see that the projection is continuous, please? (If it were not by definition.)
            $endgroup$
            – C-Star-W-Star
            Feb 19 '15 at 22:08











          • $begingroup$
            How do you want to define $X = M oplus N$?
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Israel
            Feb 19 '15 at 22:31










          • $begingroup$
            Apologies for being pedantic 2 years on, but the general categorical definition of an (external) direct sum $M oplus N$ of $M$ and $N$ is given in terms of injections from $M$ and $N$ to $M oplus N$ and not in terms of projections from $M oplus N$ to $M$ and $N$ (these arise in the definition of products). The definitions of an internal direct sum for Banach spaces that I know of don't mention projections (why would they?), but just say that it is a vector space internal direct sum whose summands are sub-Banach spaces (i.e., closed).
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Arthan
            Apr 8 '17 at 20:53



















          1












          $begingroup$

          I think the question you are trying to get at is about the relation between algebraic complements and topological complements ie if



          1) M and N are complemented algebraically (complements defined without any topology involved).



          2) M is closed.



          Does this mean N is closed?



          The answer is no, See this answer on the same site for a counterexample.



          See this survey for more relations between algebraic and topological complements. In the Banach space setting, two closed subspaces are algebraic complemented if and only if they are topologically complemented.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1154873%2fa-question-about-complement-of-a-closed-subspace-of-a-banach-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Writing $X = M oplus N$ implies that the projection $pi_1: X to M$ is continuous. Then $N = pi^-1(0)$ must be closed.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Without assuming that $N$ is closed, how to prove that $pi_1$ is continuous?
              $endgroup$
              – user149418
              Feb 18 '15 at 18:24










            • $begingroup$
              It's usually part of the definition of $oplus$ in Banach spaces.
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Israel
              Feb 18 '15 at 18:30










            • $begingroup$
              @RobertIsrael: Can you elaborate on how to see that the projection is continuous, please? (If it were not by definition.)
              $endgroup$
              – C-Star-W-Star
              Feb 19 '15 at 22:08











            • $begingroup$
              How do you want to define $X = M oplus N$?
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Israel
              Feb 19 '15 at 22:31










            • $begingroup$
              Apologies for being pedantic 2 years on, but the general categorical definition of an (external) direct sum $M oplus N$ of $M$ and $N$ is given in terms of injections from $M$ and $N$ to $M oplus N$ and not in terms of projections from $M oplus N$ to $M$ and $N$ (these arise in the definition of products). The definitions of an internal direct sum for Banach spaces that I know of don't mention projections (why would they?), but just say that it is a vector space internal direct sum whose summands are sub-Banach spaces (i.e., closed).
              $endgroup$
              – Rob Arthan
              Apr 8 '17 at 20:53
















            3












            $begingroup$

            Writing $X = M oplus N$ implies that the projection $pi_1: X to M$ is continuous. Then $N = pi^-1(0)$ must be closed.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Without assuming that $N$ is closed, how to prove that $pi_1$ is continuous?
              $endgroup$
              – user149418
              Feb 18 '15 at 18:24










            • $begingroup$
              It's usually part of the definition of $oplus$ in Banach spaces.
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Israel
              Feb 18 '15 at 18:30










            • $begingroup$
              @RobertIsrael: Can you elaborate on how to see that the projection is continuous, please? (If it were not by definition.)
              $endgroup$
              – C-Star-W-Star
              Feb 19 '15 at 22:08











            • $begingroup$
              How do you want to define $X = M oplus N$?
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Israel
              Feb 19 '15 at 22:31










            • $begingroup$
              Apologies for being pedantic 2 years on, but the general categorical definition of an (external) direct sum $M oplus N$ of $M$ and $N$ is given in terms of injections from $M$ and $N$ to $M oplus N$ and not in terms of projections from $M oplus N$ to $M$ and $N$ (these arise in the definition of products). The definitions of an internal direct sum for Banach spaces that I know of don't mention projections (why would they?), but just say that it is a vector space internal direct sum whose summands are sub-Banach spaces (i.e., closed).
              $endgroup$
              – Rob Arthan
              Apr 8 '17 at 20:53














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Writing $X = M oplus N$ implies that the projection $pi_1: X to M$ is continuous. Then $N = pi^-1(0)$ must be closed.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Writing $X = M oplus N$ implies that the projection $pi_1: X to M$ is continuous. Then $N = pi^-1(0)$ must be closed.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Feb 18 '15 at 18:17









            Robert IsraelRobert Israel

            332k23222481




            332k23222481











            • $begingroup$
              Without assuming that $N$ is closed, how to prove that $pi_1$ is continuous?
              $endgroup$
              – user149418
              Feb 18 '15 at 18:24










            • $begingroup$
              It's usually part of the definition of $oplus$ in Banach spaces.
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Israel
              Feb 18 '15 at 18:30










            • $begingroup$
              @RobertIsrael: Can you elaborate on how to see that the projection is continuous, please? (If it were not by definition.)
              $endgroup$
              – C-Star-W-Star
              Feb 19 '15 at 22:08











            • $begingroup$
              How do you want to define $X = M oplus N$?
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Israel
              Feb 19 '15 at 22:31










            • $begingroup$
              Apologies for being pedantic 2 years on, but the general categorical definition of an (external) direct sum $M oplus N$ of $M$ and $N$ is given in terms of injections from $M$ and $N$ to $M oplus N$ and not in terms of projections from $M oplus N$ to $M$ and $N$ (these arise in the definition of products). The definitions of an internal direct sum for Banach spaces that I know of don't mention projections (why would they?), but just say that it is a vector space internal direct sum whose summands are sub-Banach spaces (i.e., closed).
              $endgroup$
              – Rob Arthan
              Apr 8 '17 at 20:53

















            • $begingroup$
              Without assuming that $N$ is closed, how to prove that $pi_1$ is continuous?
              $endgroup$
              – user149418
              Feb 18 '15 at 18:24










            • $begingroup$
              It's usually part of the definition of $oplus$ in Banach spaces.
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Israel
              Feb 18 '15 at 18:30










            • $begingroup$
              @RobertIsrael: Can you elaborate on how to see that the projection is continuous, please? (If it were not by definition.)
              $endgroup$
              – C-Star-W-Star
              Feb 19 '15 at 22:08











            • $begingroup$
              How do you want to define $X = M oplus N$?
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Israel
              Feb 19 '15 at 22:31










            • $begingroup$
              Apologies for being pedantic 2 years on, but the general categorical definition of an (external) direct sum $M oplus N$ of $M$ and $N$ is given in terms of injections from $M$ and $N$ to $M oplus N$ and not in terms of projections from $M oplus N$ to $M$ and $N$ (these arise in the definition of products). The definitions of an internal direct sum for Banach spaces that I know of don't mention projections (why would they?), but just say that it is a vector space internal direct sum whose summands are sub-Banach spaces (i.e., closed).
              $endgroup$
              – Rob Arthan
              Apr 8 '17 at 20:53
















            $begingroup$
            Without assuming that $N$ is closed, how to prove that $pi_1$ is continuous?
            $endgroup$
            – user149418
            Feb 18 '15 at 18:24




            $begingroup$
            Without assuming that $N$ is closed, how to prove that $pi_1$ is continuous?
            $endgroup$
            – user149418
            Feb 18 '15 at 18:24












            $begingroup$
            It's usually part of the definition of $oplus$ in Banach spaces.
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Israel
            Feb 18 '15 at 18:30




            $begingroup$
            It's usually part of the definition of $oplus$ in Banach spaces.
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Israel
            Feb 18 '15 at 18:30












            $begingroup$
            @RobertIsrael: Can you elaborate on how to see that the projection is continuous, please? (If it were not by definition.)
            $endgroup$
            – C-Star-W-Star
            Feb 19 '15 at 22:08





            $begingroup$
            @RobertIsrael: Can you elaborate on how to see that the projection is continuous, please? (If it were not by definition.)
            $endgroup$
            – C-Star-W-Star
            Feb 19 '15 at 22:08













            $begingroup$
            How do you want to define $X = M oplus N$?
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Israel
            Feb 19 '15 at 22:31




            $begingroup$
            How do you want to define $X = M oplus N$?
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Israel
            Feb 19 '15 at 22:31












            $begingroup$
            Apologies for being pedantic 2 years on, but the general categorical definition of an (external) direct sum $M oplus N$ of $M$ and $N$ is given in terms of injections from $M$ and $N$ to $M oplus N$ and not in terms of projections from $M oplus N$ to $M$ and $N$ (these arise in the definition of products). The definitions of an internal direct sum for Banach spaces that I know of don't mention projections (why would they?), but just say that it is a vector space internal direct sum whose summands are sub-Banach spaces (i.e., closed).
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Arthan
            Apr 8 '17 at 20:53





            $begingroup$
            Apologies for being pedantic 2 years on, but the general categorical definition of an (external) direct sum $M oplus N$ of $M$ and $N$ is given in terms of injections from $M$ and $N$ to $M oplus N$ and not in terms of projections from $M oplus N$ to $M$ and $N$ (these arise in the definition of products). The definitions of an internal direct sum for Banach spaces that I know of don't mention projections (why would they?), but just say that it is a vector space internal direct sum whose summands are sub-Banach spaces (i.e., closed).
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Arthan
            Apr 8 '17 at 20:53












            1












            $begingroup$

            I think the question you are trying to get at is about the relation between algebraic complements and topological complements ie if



            1) M and N are complemented algebraically (complements defined without any topology involved).



            2) M is closed.



            Does this mean N is closed?



            The answer is no, See this answer on the same site for a counterexample.



            See this survey for more relations between algebraic and topological complements. In the Banach space setting, two closed subspaces are algebraic complemented if and only if they are topologically complemented.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              I think the question you are trying to get at is about the relation between algebraic complements and topological complements ie if



              1) M and N are complemented algebraically (complements defined without any topology involved).



              2) M is closed.



              Does this mean N is closed?



              The answer is no, See this answer on the same site for a counterexample.



              See this survey for more relations between algebraic and topological complements. In the Banach space setting, two closed subspaces are algebraic complemented if and only if they are topologically complemented.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                I think the question you are trying to get at is about the relation between algebraic complements and topological complements ie if



                1) M and N are complemented algebraically (complements defined without any topology involved).



                2) M is closed.



                Does this mean N is closed?



                The answer is no, See this answer on the same site for a counterexample.



                See this survey for more relations between algebraic and topological complements. In the Banach space setting, two closed subspaces are algebraic complemented if and only if they are topologically complemented.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I think the question you are trying to get at is about the relation between algebraic complements and topological complements ie if



                1) M and N are complemented algebraically (complements defined without any topology involved).



                2) M is closed.



                Does this mean N is closed?



                The answer is no, See this answer on the same site for a counterexample.



                See this survey for more relations between algebraic and topological complements. In the Banach space setting, two closed subspaces are algebraic complemented if and only if they are topologically complemented.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 1 at 22:09









                HarshavardhanHarshavardhan

                111




                111



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1154873%2fa-question-about-complement-of-a-closed-subspace-of-a-banach-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

                    Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleaguesHow can I better understand manager or clients with strong accents?Adding more movement and speech at the fundamental level to a highly-sedentary job?Difficulty in understanding Manager's accent(language and communication)How to adjust yourself where your colleagues are not understanding to you?Understanding manager's expectationsForeigner and colleagues using slangHaving difficulty understanding meetingsHow do you breathe when giving a speech?Trouble Waking Up for Emergencies (On-Call)Problems with colleaguesColleagues feeling insecure when I do my work

                    Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O