Are dual vector spaces unique? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Why are vector spaces not isomorphic to their duals?Duality, Symmetry, Dual SpacesInjectivity of the dual mapDual spaces and inner productIs there always an injective map from a space in its dual space?Tensor Product of Vector Spaces - Quotient DefinitionVector space generated by set intersectionProving that the dual of a finite dimensional vector space separates points-is my proof correct?Intersection of infinite subspacesVector spaces - External Direct Sums

why doesn't university give past final exams' answers

Searching extreme points of polyhedron

How does TikZ render an arc?

Any stored/leased 737s that could substitute for grounded MAXs?

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?

Getting representations of the Lie group out of representations of its Lie algebra

My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

Proving that any solution to the differential equation of an oscillator can be written as a sum of sinusoids.

The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?

calculator's angle answer for trig ratios that can work in more than 1 quadrant on the unit circle

Improvising over quartal voicings

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?

Dinosaur Word Search, Letter Solve, and Unscramble

How to make an animal which can only breed for a certain number of generations?

Inverse square law not accurate for non-point masses?

Which types of prepositional phrase is "toward its employees" in Philosophy guiding the organization's policies towards its employees is not bad?

Fit odd number of triplets in a measure?

Is the Mordenkainen's Sword spell underpowered?

Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions

How do I find my Spellcasting Ability for my D&D character?

Plotting a Maclaurin series

The Nth Gryphon Number



Are dual vector spaces unique?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Why are vector spaces not isomorphic to their duals?Duality, Symmetry, Dual SpacesInjectivity of the dual mapDual spaces and inner productIs there always an injective map from a space in its dual space?Tensor Product of Vector Spaces - Quotient DefinitionVector space generated by set intersectionProving that the dual of a finite dimensional vector space separates points-is my proof correct?Intersection of infinite subspacesVector spaces - External Direct Sums










1












$begingroup$


If we have a vector space $V$ this has a dual $V^*$.
When a learned about dual spaces we were told it has the same dimension as the vector space and I think the lecturer said they were unique (if not the notation of just using * seems a bit vague).



Then I noticed something. Say $V$ is a function space, with a set of basis functions $e_i (x)$. Then I can create a range of dual vector spaces:



1)
$$
int e_i(x) w_1 (x) ●
$$



2)
$$
int e_i(x) w_2(x) ●
$$



Where $w_1ne w_2$. We now either have 2 dual spaces or the dual space is twice as big as the origional space.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    They have the same dimension only if they are finitely-dimensional (in fact it is iff, but whatever).
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:47











  • $begingroup$
    In your examples, are the two duals not isomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By definition the dual space of a $k$-vector space $V$ is the set of linear maps $Vto k$, equipped with the obvious structure of $k$-vector space. How could this definition leave space for non-uniqueness?
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:52










  • $begingroup$
    What's a range of dual vector spaces? What are $w_1$ and $w_2$, and how are you integrating?
    $endgroup$
    – B. Pasternak
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:59
















1












$begingroup$


If we have a vector space $V$ this has a dual $V^*$.
When a learned about dual spaces we were told it has the same dimension as the vector space and I think the lecturer said they were unique (if not the notation of just using * seems a bit vague).



Then I noticed something. Say $V$ is a function space, with a set of basis functions $e_i (x)$. Then I can create a range of dual vector spaces:



1)
$$
int e_i(x) w_1 (x) ●
$$



2)
$$
int e_i(x) w_2(x) ●
$$



Where $w_1ne w_2$. We now either have 2 dual spaces or the dual space is twice as big as the origional space.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    They have the same dimension only if they are finitely-dimensional (in fact it is iff, but whatever).
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:47











  • $begingroup$
    In your examples, are the two duals not isomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By definition the dual space of a $k$-vector space $V$ is the set of linear maps $Vto k$, equipped with the obvious structure of $k$-vector space. How could this definition leave space for non-uniqueness?
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:52










  • $begingroup$
    What's a range of dual vector spaces? What are $w_1$ and $w_2$, and how are you integrating?
    $endgroup$
    – B. Pasternak
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:59














1












1








1





$begingroup$


If we have a vector space $V$ this has a dual $V^*$.
When a learned about dual spaces we were told it has the same dimension as the vector space and I think the lecturer said they were unique (if not the notation of just using * seems a bit vague).



Then I noticed something. Say $V$ is a function space, with a set of basis functions $e_i (x)$. Then I can create a range of dual vector spaces:



1)
$$
int e_i(x) w_1 (x) ●
$$



2)
$$
int e_i(x) w_2(x) ●
$$



Where $w_1ne w_2$. We now either have 2 dual spaces or the dual space is twice as big as the origional space.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




If we have a vector space $V$ this has a dual $V^*$.
When a learned about dual spaces we were told it has the same dimension as the vector space and I think the lecturer said they were unique (if not the notation of just using * seems a bit vague).



Then I noticed something. Say $V$ is a function space, with a set of basis functions $e_i (x)$. Then I can create a range of dual vector spaces:



1)
$$
int e_i(x) w_1 (x) ●
$$



2)
$$
int e_i(x) w_2(x) ●
$$



Where $w_1ne w_2$. We now either have 2 dual spaces or the dual space is twice as big as the origional space.







linear-algebra vector-spaces dual-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Oct 13 '17 at 9:47









Toby PeterkenToby Peterken

1496




1496











  • $begingroup$
    They have the same dimension only if they are finitely-dimensional (in fact it is iff, but whatever).
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:47











  • $begingroup$
    In your examples, are the two duals not isomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By definition the dual space of a $k$-vector space $V$ is the set of linear maps $Vto k$, equipped with the obvious structure of $k$-vector space. How could this definition leave space for non-uniqueness?
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:52










  • $begingroup$
    What's a range of dual vector spaces? What are $w_1$ and $w_2$, and how are you integrating?
    $endgroup$
    – B. Pasternak
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:59

















  • $begingroup$
    They have the same dimension only if they are finitely-dimensional (in fact it is iff, but whatever).
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:47











  • $begingroup$
    In your examples, are the two duals not isomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By definition the dual space of a $k$-vector space $V$ is the set of linear maps $Vto k$, equipped with the obvious structure of $k$-vector space. How could this definition leave space for non-uniqueness?
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:52










  • $begingroup$
    What's a range of dual vector spaces? What are $w_1$ and $w_2$, and how are you integrating?
    $endgroup$
    – B. Pasternak
    Oct 13 '17 at 9:59
















$begingroup$
They have the same dimension only if they are finitely-dimensional (in fact it is iff, but whatever).
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Oct 13 '17 at 9:47





$begingroup$
They have the same dimension only if they are finitely-dimensional (in fact it is iff, but whatever).
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Oct 13 '17 at 9:47













$begingroup$
In your examples, are the two duals not isomorphic?
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Oct 13 '17 at 9:48




$begingroup$
In your examples, are the two duals not isomorphic?
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Oct 13 '17 at 9:48




1




1




$begingroup$
By definition the dual space of a $k$-vector space $V$ is the set of linear maps $Vto k$, equipped with the obvious structure of $k$-vector space. How could this definition leave space for non-uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Oct 13 '17 at 9:52




$begingroup$
By definition the dual space of a $k$-vector space $V$ is the set of linear maps $Vto k$, equipped with the obvious structure of $k$-vector space. How could this definition leave space for non-uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Oct 13 '17 at 9:52












$begingroup$
What's a range of dual vector spaces? What are $w_1$ and $w_2$, and how are you integrating?
$endgroup$
– B. Pasternak
Oct 13 '17 at 9:59





$begingroup$
What's a range of dual vector spaces? What are $w_1$ and $w_2$, and how are you integrating?
$endgroup$
– B. Pasternak
Oct 13 '17 at 9:59











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The dual of a vector space $V$ is defined as
$$V^*:=hom(V,k) ,$$
the vector space of linear maps from $V$ to the base field $k$. It is not an existence statement or something similar, it is a definition, and as such it is unique.



For the dimension statement, if $V$ is finite dimensional, then $V^*$ has the same dimension as $V$. Even then, $V$ and $V^*$ are not canonically isomorphic. In general, you have that
$$dim V^*gedim V .$$
It is a good exercise (if possibly a bit hard for you, if I gauge your level correctly) to prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.



If you have more structure (e.g. topological vector spaces, Banach spaces and Hilbert spaces), then there is a notion of continuous dual, again denoted by $V^*$. There is an important theorem (called the Riesz representation theorem) saying that if $V$ is a Hilbert space, then $V$ is canonically isomorphic to its continuous dual $V^*$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension". Do you mean the dual of any infinite-dimensional vector space cannot have countable dimension?
    $endgroup$
    – Joppy
    Oct 13 '17 at 11:15










  • $begingroup$
    @Joppy By countable dimension, I mean a base of cardinality $aleph_0:=|mathbbN|$. So the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Oct 13 '17 at 11:32











  • $begingroup$
    Ah, ok. The definition of "countable" I know is a set that has an injection into $mathbbN$, which is either finite or has cardinality $|mathbbN|$.
    $endgroup$
    – Joppy
    Oct 13 '17 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @Joppy I usually say "at most countable" for that notion.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Oct 13 '17 at 13:33


















-1












$begingroup$

The dual space is unique. To demonstrate this, let us formally define some linear maps from the original vector space $V$ with elements $u, v,ldots$ to the real line $mathscrR$:



$f: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto f(u):=int_0^1 u(x)w_1(x)dx$.



$g: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto g(u):=int_2^pi u(x)w_2(x)dx$.



$h: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto h(u):=fracmathrmdu(x)mathrmdx$ evaluated at $x=5$.
… etc.



All these maps are linear in their arguments and are "well-defined" in the sense that if $u=v$ implies $f(u)=f(v)$, $g(u)=g(v)$, $h(u)=h(v)$ etc. Each map leads from one element $v$ to one element in $mathscrR$.

The SET of maps $f, g, h,ldots$ (and all kind of linear maps you can think of...) are the element of the dual space. Moreover, the fact that you collect ALL POSSIBLE maps guarantees that this collection is unique! In other words: you do not make any choice at all. Nobody can do this in a different way.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please use $Latex$ to format math. See here please.
    $endgroup$
    – tarit goswami
    Apr 2 at 14:52











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2470393%2fare-dual-vector-spaces-unique%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

The dual of a vector space $V$ is defined as
$$V^*:=hom(V,k) ,$$
the vector space of linear maps from $V$ to the base field $k$. It is not an existence statement or something similar, it is a definition, and as such it is unique.



For the dimension statement, if $V$ is finite dimensional, then $V^*$ has the same dimension as $V$. Even then, $V$ and $V^*$ are not canonically isomorphic. In general, you have that
$$dim V^*gedim V .$$
It is a good exercise (if possibly a bit hard for you, if I gauge your level correctly) to prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.



If you have more structure (e.g. topological vector spaces, Banach spaces and Hilbert spaces), then there is a notion of continuous dual, again denoted by $V^*$. There is an important theorem (called the Riesz representation theorem) saying that if $V$ is a Hilbert space, then $V$ is canonically isomorphic to its continuous dual $V^*$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension". Do you mean the dual of any infinite-dimensional vector space cannot have countable dimension?
    $endgroup$
    – Joppy
    Oct 13 '17 at 11:15










  • $begingroup$
    @Joppy By countable dimension, I mean a base of cardinality $aleph_0:=|mathbbN|$. So the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Oct 13 '17 at 11:32











  • $begingroup$
    Ah, ok. The definition of "countable" I know is a set that has an injection into $mathbbN$, which is either finite or has cardinality $|mathbbN|$.
    $endgroup$
    – Joppy
    Oct 13 '17 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @Joppy I usually say "at most countable" for that notion.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Oct 13 '17 at 13:33















2












$begingroup$

The dual of a vector space $V$ is defined as
$$V^*:=hom(V,k) ,$$
the vector space of linear maps from $V$ to the base field $k$. It is not an existence statement or something similar, it is a definition, and as such it is unique.



For the dimension statement, if $V$ is finite dimensional, then $V^*$ has the same dimension as $V$. Even then, $V$ and $V^*$ are not canonically isomorphic. In general, you have that
$$dim V^*gedim V .$$
It is a good exercise (if possibly a bit hard for you, if I gauge your level correctly) to prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.



If you have more structure (e.g. topological vector spaces, Banach spaces and Hilbert spaces), then there is a notion of continuous dual, again denoted by $V^*$. There is an important theorem (called the Riesz representation theorem) saying that if $V$ is a Hilbert space, then $V$ is canonically isomorphic to its continuous dual $V^*$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension". Do you mean the dual of any infinite-dimensional vector space cannot have countable dimension?
    $endgroup$
    – Joppy
    Oct 13 '17 at 11:15










  • $begingroup$
    @Joppy By countable dimension, I mean a base of cardinality $aleph_0:=|mathbbN|$. So the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Oct 13 '17 at 11:32











  • $begingroup$
    Ah, ok. The definition of "countable" I know is a set that has an injection into $mathbbN$, which is either finite or has cardinality $|mathbbN|$.
    $endgroup$
    – Joppy
    Oct 13 '17 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @Joppy I usually say "at most countable" for that notion.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Oct 13 '17 at 13:33













2












2








2





$begingroup$

The dual of a vector space $V$ is defined as
$$V^*:=hom(V,k) ,$$
the vector space of linear maps from $V$ to the base field $k$. It is not an existence statement or something similar, it is a definition, and as such it is unique.



For the dimension statement, if $V$ is finite dimensional, then $V^*$ has the same dimension as $V$. Even then, $V$ and $V^*$ are not canonically isomorphic. In general, you have that
$$dim V^*gedim V .$$
It is a good exercise (if possibly a bit hard for you, if I gauge your level correctly) to prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.



If you have more structure (e.g. topological vector spaces, Banach spaces and Hilbert spaces), then there is a notion of continuous dual, again denoted by $V^*$. There is an important theorem (called the Riesz representation theorem) saying that if $V$ is a Hilbert space, then $V$ is canonically isomorphic to its continuous dual $V^*$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The dual of a vector space $V$ is defined as
$$V^*:=hom(V,k) ,$$
the vector space of linear maps from $V$ to the base field $k$. It is not an existence statement or something similar, it is a definition, and as such it is unique.



For the dimension statement, if $V$ is finite dimensional, then $V^*$ has the same dimension as $V$. Even then, $V$ and $V^*$ are not canonically isomorphic. In general, you have that
$$dim V^*gedim V .$$
It is a good exercise (if possibly a bit hard for you, if I gauge your level correctly) to prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.



If you have more structure (e.g. topological vector spaces, Banach spaces and Hilbert spaces), then there is a notion of continuous dual, again denoted by $V^*$. There is an important theorem (called the Riesz representation theorem) saying that if $V$ is a Hilbert space, then $V$ is canonically isomorphic to its continuous dual $V^*$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Oct 13 '17 at 10:06









Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud

20.6k33897




20.6k33897











  • $begingroup$
    "prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension". Do you mean the dual of any infinite-dimensional vector space cannot have countable dimension?
    $endgroup$
    – Joppy
    Oct 13 '17 at 11:15










  • $begingroup$
    @Joppy By countable dimension, I mean a base of cardinality $aleph_0:=|mathbbN|$. So the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Oct 13 '17 at 11:32











  • $begingroup$
    Ah, ok. The definition of "countable" I know is a set that has an injection into $mathbbN$, which is either finite or has cardinality $|mathbbN|$.
    $endgroup$
    – Joppy
    Oct 13 '17 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @Joppy I usually say "at most countable" for that notion.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Oct 13 '17 at 13:33
















  • $begingroup$
    "prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension". Do you mean the dual of any infinite-dimensional vector space cannot have countable dimension?
    $endgroup$
    – Joppy
    Oct 13 '17 at 11:15










  • $begingroup$
    @Joppy By countable dimension, I mean a base of cardinality $aleph_0:=|mathbbN|$. So the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Oct 13 '17 at 11:32











  • $begingroup$
    Ah, ok. The definition of "countable" I know is a set that has an injection into $mathbbN$, which is either finite or has cardinality $|mathbbN|$.
    $endgroup$
    – Joppy
    Oct 13 '17 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @Joppy I usually say "at most countable" for that notion.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Oct 13 '17 at 13:33















$begingroup$
"prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension". Do you mean the dual of any infinite-dimensional vector space cannot have countable dimension?
$endgroup$
– Joppy
Oct 13 '17 at 11:15




$begingroup$
"prove that the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension". Do you mean the dual of any infinite-dimensional vector space cannot have countable dimension?
$endgroup$
– Joppy
Oct 13 '17 at 11:15












$begingroup$
@Joppy By countable dimension, I mean a base of cardinality $aleph_0:=|mathbbN|$. So the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 13 '17 at 11:32





$begingroup$
@Joppy By countable dimension, I mean a base of cardinality $aleph_0:=|mathbbN|$. So the dual of any vector space cannot have countable dimension.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 13 '17 at 11:32













$begingroup$
Ah, ok. The definition of "countable" I know is a set that has an injection into $mathbbN$, which is either finite or has cardinality $|mathbbN|$.
$endgroup$
– Joppy
Oct 13 '17 at 13:04




$begingroup$
Ah, ok. The definition of "countable" I know is a set that has an injection into $mathbbN$, which is either finite or has cardinality $|mathbbN|$.
$endgroup$
– Joppy
Oct 13 '17 at 13:04












$begingroup$
@Joppy I usually say "at most countable" for that notion.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 13 '17 at 13:33




$begingroup$
@Joppy I usually say "at most countable" for that notion.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 13 '17 at 13:33











-1












$begingroup$

The dual space is unique. To demonstrate this, let us formally define some linear maps from the original vector space $V$ with elements $u, v,ldots$ to the real line $mathscrR$:



$f: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto f(u):=int_0^1 u(x)w_1(x)dx$.



$g: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto g(u):=int_2^pi u(x)w_2(x)dx$.



$h: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto h(u):=fracmathrmdu(x)mathrmdx$ evaluated at $x=5$.
… etc.



All these maps are linear in their arguments and are "well-defined" in the sense that if $u=v$ implies $f(u)=f(v)$, $g(u)=g(v)$, $h(u)=h(v)$ etc. Each map leads from one element $v$ to one element in $mathscrR$.

The SET of maps $f, g, h,ldots$ (and all kind of linear maps you can think of...) are the element of the dual space. Moreover, the fact that you collect ALL POSSIBLE maps guarantees that this collection is unique! In other words: you do not make any choice at all. Nobody can do this in a different way.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please use $Latex$ to format math. See here please.
    $endgroup$
    – tarit goswami
    Apr 2 at 14:52















-1












$begingroup$

The dual space is unique. To demonstrate this, let us formally define some linear maps from the original vector space $V$ with elements $u, v,ldots$ to the real line $mathscrR$:



$f: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto f(u):=int_0^1 u(x)w_1(x)dx$.



$g: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto g(u):=int_2^pi u(x)w_2(x)dx$.



$h: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto h(u):=fracmathrmdu(x)mathrmdx$ evaluated at $x=5$.
… etc.



All these maps are linear in their arguments and are "well-defined" in the sense that if $u=v$ implies $f(u)=f(v)$, $g(u)=g(v)$, $h(u)=h(v)$ etc. Each map leads from one element $v$ to one element in $mathscrR$.

The SET of maps $f, g, h,ldots$ (and all kind of linear maps you can think of...) are the element of the dual space. Moreover, the fact that you collect ALL POSSIBLE maps guarantees that this collection is unique! In other words: you do not make any choice at all. Nobody can do this in a different way.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please use $Latex$ to format math. See here please.
    $endgroup$
    – tarit goswami
    Apr 2 at 14:52













-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$

The dual space is unique. To demonstrate this, let us formally define some linear maps from the original vector space $V$ with elements $u, v,ldots$ to the real line $mathscrR$:



$f: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto f(u):=int_0^1 u(x)w_1(x)dx$.



$g: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto g(u):=int_2^pi u(x)w_2(x)dx$.



$h: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto h(u):=fracmathrmdu(x)mathrmdx$ evaluated at $x=5$.
… etc.



All these maps are linear in their arguments and are "well-defined" in the sense that if $u=v$ implies $f(u)=f(v)$, $g(u)=g(v)$, $h(u)=h(v)$ etc. Each map leads from one element $v$ to one element in $mathscrR$.

The SET of maps $f, g, h,ldots$ (and all kind of linear maps you can think of...) are the element of the dual space. Moreover, the fact that you collect ALL POSSIBLE maps guarantees that this collection is unique! In other words: you do not make any choice at all. Nobody can do this in a different way.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The dual space is unique. To demonstrate this, let us formally define some linear maps from the original vector space $V$ with elements $u, v,ldots$ to the real line $mathscrR$:



$f: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto f(u):=int_0^1 u(x)w_1(x)dx$.



$g: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto g(u):=int_2^pi u(x)w_2(x)dx$.



$h: V to mathscrR$ with $u mapsto h(u):=fracmathrmdu(x)mathrmdx$ evaluated at $x=5$.
… etc.



All these maps are linear in their arguments and are "well-defined" in the sense that if $u=v$ implies $f(u)=f(v)$, $g(u)=g(v)$, $h(u)=h(v)$ etc. Each map leads from one element $v$ to one element in $mathscrR$.

The SET of maps $f, g, h,ldots$ (and all kind of linear maps you can think of...) are the element of the dual space. Moreover, the fact that you collect ALL POSSIBLE maps guarantees that this collection is unique! In other words: you do not make any choice at all. Nobody can do this in a different way.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Apr 3 at 13:16

























answered Apr 2 at 13:57









Jacques SmeetsJacques Smeets

11




11







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please use $Latex$ to format math. See here please.
    $endgroup$
    – tarit goswami
    Apr 2 at 14:52












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please use $Latex$ to format math. See here please.
    $endgroup$
    – tarit goswami
    Apr 2 at 14:52







1




1




$begingroup$
Please use $Latex$ to format math. See here please.
$endgroup$
– tarit goswami
Apr 2 at 14:52




$begingroup$
Please use $Latex$ to format math. See here please.
$endgroup$
– tarit goswami
Apr 2 at 14:52

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2470393%2fare-dual-vector-spaces-unique%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleaguesHow can I better understand manager or clients with strong accents?Adding more movement and speech at the fundamental level to a highly-sedentary job?Difficulty in understanding Manager's accent(language and communication)How to adjust yourself where your colleagues are not understanding to you?Understanding manager's expectationsForeigner and colleagues using slangHaving difficulty understanding meetingsHow do you breathe when giving a speech?Trouble Waking Up for Emergencies (On-Call)Problems with colleaguesColleagues feeling insecure when I do my work

Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O