are the global sections of a flat sheaf over a discrete valuation ring a free module? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)The Theorem on Formal Funtions - Harthshorne Theorem 11.1Interpretation of sheaf flat over a baseHartshorne notation in section III.12$Gamma(X,-)$ for Quasi-Coherent/Coherent Sheaves Maps to R-modules/Finitely Generated R modulesCan the theorem on semicontinuity of fiber dimension be explained as a semi-continuty of rank of a quasi-coherent sheaf?Uniqueness of flat limitsEasy question about higher direct image functors with affine baseFlat scheme over a Dedekind ringMap between global sections of a flat morphism is flatCan one obtain a generating set for a module of local sections of a coherent sheaf by finding generating sets at the stalks?

No Invitation for Tourist Visa, But i want to visit

Bash script to execute command with file from directory and condition

Changing order of draw operation in PGFPlots

How do you cope with tons of web fonts when copying and pasting from web pages?

Was the pager message from Nick Fury to Captain Marvel unnecessary?

Why did Bronn offer to be Tyrion Lannister's champion in trial by combat?

Unicode symbols with XeLaTeX and Lato font

Table formatting with tabularx?

How to get a flat-head nail out of a piece of wood?

How did 'ликвиди́ровать' semantically shift to mean 'abolish' and 'destroy, kill'?

Who's the Giant Batman in the back of this dark knights metal Batman picture?

Who's this lady in the war room?

How do I find my Spellcasting Ability for my D&D character?

Is there a spell that can create a permanent fire?

3D Masyu - A Die

Restricting the Object Type for the get method in java HashMap

Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?

How to create a button that adds InputFields when clicked?

Can a Knight grant Knighthood to another?

Is the Mordenkainen's Sword spell underpowered?

Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?

Proving that any solution to the differential equation of an oscillator can be written as a sum of sinusoids.

How to achieve cat-like agility?

Why are current probes so expensive?



are the global sections of a flat sheaf over a discrete valuation ring a free module?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)The Theorem on Formal Funtions - Harthshorne Theorem 11.1Interpretation of sheaf flat over a baseHartshorne notation in section III.12$Gamma(X,-)$ for Quasi-Coherent/Coherent Sheaves Maps to R-modules/Finitely Generated R modulesCan the theorem on semicontinuity of fiber dimension be explained as a semi-continuty of rank of a quasi-coherent sheaf?Uniqueness of flat limitsEasy question about higher direct image functors with affine baseFlat scheme over a Dedekind ringMap between global sections of a flat morphism is flatCan one obtain a generating set for a module of local sections of a coherent sheaf by finding generating sets at the stalks?










1












$begingroup$


Let $f:Xto operatornameSpecmathbfZ_p$ be a smooth proper $mathbfZ_p$-scheme and $F$ a coherent sheaf on $X$ which is flat over $mathbfZ_p$. Further suppose that $H^1(X_p, F_p)=0$ where $X_p$ denotes the special fiber $Xotimes_mathbfZ_p mathbfF_p$ of $X$ and $F_p$ the pullback of $F$ to $X_p$.



Question 1: Is it then true that $R^1f_*F$ has empty support?



Question 2: What has this to do with the torsion of (the global sections) of $F$? Can we conclude from this that $H^0(X,F)$ is a free $mathbfZ_p$-module?



This seems all to follow from statements in Chapter III, Section 12 of Hartshorne but I fail to understand what the meaning of the higher direct images $R^if_*F$ really is.



EDIT: I also happen to now that there is a short exact sequence



$0to H^0(X,F')to H^0(X,F'')to H^0(X,F)to 0$



and that the first two terms commute with base change by $mathbfF_p$, i.e.



$H^0(X,F')otimes F_p = H^0(X_p,F'_p)$ and the same is true for $F''$.



The proof that I am trying to understand is the proof of Lemma 1.1 here.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $f:Xto operatornameSpecmathbfZ_p$ be a smooth proper $mathbfZ_p$-scheme and $F$ a coherent sheaf on $X$ which is flat over $mathbfZ_p$. Further suppose that $H^1(X_p, F_p)=0$ where $X_p$ denotes the special fiber $Xotimes_mathbfZ_p mathbfF_p$ of $X$ and $F_p$ the pullback of $F$ to $X_p$.



    Question 1: Is it then true that $R^1f_*F$ has empty support?



    Question 2: What has this to do with the torsion of (the global sections) of $F$? Can we conclude from this that $H^0(X,F)$ is a free $mathbfZ_p$-module?



    This seems all to follow from statements in Chapter III, Section 12 of Hartshorne but I fail to understand what the meaning of the higher direct images $R^if_*F$ really is.



    EDIT: I also happen to now that there is a short exact sequence



    $0to H^0(X,F')to H^0(X,F'')to H^0(X,F)to 0$



    and that the first two terms commute with base change by $mathbfF_p$, i.e.



    $H^0(X,F')otimes F_p = H^0(X_p,F'_p)$ and the same is true for $F''$.



    The proof that I am trying to understand is the proof of Lemma 1.1 here.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $f:Xto operatornameSpecmathbfZ_p$ be a smooth proper $mathbfZ_p$-scheme and $F$ a coherent sheaf on $X$ which is flat over $mathbfZ_p$. Further suppose that $H^1(X_p, F_p)=0$ where $X_p$ denotes the special fiber $Xotimes_mathbfZ_p mathbfF_p$ of $X$ and $F_p$ the pullback of $F$ to $X_p$.



      Question 1: Is it then true that $R^1f_*F$ has empty support?



      Question 2: What has this to do with the torsion of (the global sections) of $F$? Can we conclude from this that $H^0(X,F)$ is a free $mathbfZ_p$-module?



      This seems all to follow from statements in Chapter III, Section 12 of Hartshorne but I fail to understand what the meaning of the higher direct images $R^if_*F$ really is.



      EDIT: I also happen to now that there is a short exact sequence



      $0to H^0(X,F')to H^0(X,F'')to H^0(X,F)to 0$



      and that the first two terms commute with base change by $mathbfF_p$, i.e.



      $H^0(X,F')otimes F_p = H^0(X_p,F'_p)$ and the same is true for $F''$.



      The proof that I am trying to understand is the proof of Lemma 1.1 here.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $f:Xto operatornameSpecmathbfZ_p$ be a smooth proper $mathbfZ_p$-scheme and $F$ a coherent sheaf on $X$ which is flat over $mathbfZ_p$. Further suppose that $H^1(X_p, F_p)=0$ where $X_p$ denotes the special fiber $Xotimes_mathbfZ_p mathbfF_p$ of $X$ and $F_p$ the pullback of $F$ to $X_p$.



      Question 1: Is it then true that $R^1f_*F$ has empty support?



      Question 2: What has this to do with the torsion of (the global sections) of $F$? Can we conclude from this that $H^0(X,F)$ is a free $mathbfZ_p$-module?



      This seems all to follow from statements in Chapter III, Section 12 of Hartshorne but I fail to understand what the meaning of the higher direct images $R^if_*F$ really is.



      EDIT: I also happen to now that there is a short exact sequence



      $0to H^0(X,F')to H^0(X,F'')to H^0(X,F)to 0$



      and that the first two terms commute with base change by $mathbfF_p$, i.e.



      $H^0(X,F')otimes F_p = H^0(X_p,F'_p)$ and the same is true for $F''$.



      The proof that I am trying to understand is the proof of Lemma 1.1 here.







      algebraic-geometry schemes sheaf-cohomology coherent-sheaves flatness






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 4 at 18:30









      Alex Youcis

      36.8k775115




      36.8k775115










      asked Apr 2 at 17:18









      user1728user1728

      221215




      221215




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0





          +100







          $begingroup$

          $newcommandSpecmathrmSpec$$newcommandZmathbbZ$$newcommandQmathbbQ$I don't have Hartshorne on me, but I assume that the cited section is on proper base change/semi-continuity.



          Since $f:Xto Spec(Z_p)$ is proper, $mathcalF$ is $Z_p$-flat and coherent, and $S$ and $X$ are Noetherian then we know that the map $f_i:Spec(Z_p)to Z$ given by $smapsto dim_k(s)H^i(X_k(s),mathcalF_k(s))$ is upper semi-continuous for all $igeqslant 0$. In particular since $f_1$ is upper semi-continuous we know that $f^-1((-infty,1))$ is an open subset of $Spec(mathbbZ_p)$. Since you're assuming that $pin f^-1((-1,infty))$ you can deduce that $Spec(Z_p)=f^-1((-infty,1))$ since the only open subset of $Spec(Z_p)$ containing $p$ is $Spec(Z_p)$. Thus, $H^1(X_Q_p,mathcalF_Q_p)=0$.



          Now, since $Spec(Z_p)$ is connected and reduced we can use the same theory to show that since $f_1$ is constant that $R^1 f_astmathcalF$ is locally free and, moreover, that we have an isomorphism $(R^1 f_astmathcalF)_k(s)cong H^1(X_k(s),mathcalF_k(s))=0$ for all $s$ so that $R^1 f_astmathcalF=0$.



          EDIT: To answer your other question, it is true that $H^0(X,mathcalF)$ is a free $Z_p$-module. This is more sophisticated though (I don't think it's in Hartshorne?) but it's a classical result that follows from things written in Mumford's book on abelian varieties. I found a reference here in the form of Corollary 2.3.



          Indeed, since $Spec(Z_p)$ is affine we know that $f_ast mathcalF=widetildeH^0(X,mathcalF)$ (see the second edit below) and so the claim you want to prove is that $f_ast mathcalF$ is locally free. This is then what's stated in the cited notes of Osserman.



          EDIT EDIT: Just to point out that in your response to "I don't understand what $R^i f_astmathcalF$ is really" note that if you have a reasonable map (qcqs probably?) $f:XtoSpec(A)$ then $H^i(X,mathcalF)$ is an $A$-module and $R^if_astmathcalF$ is just the quasi-coherent sheaf $widetildeH^i(X,mathcalF)$. All of the above is then by way of asking questions like "Is it true that if $H^1(X,mathcalF)otimes_mathbbZ_pmathbbF_p=0$ that $H^1(X,mathcalF)=0$? Moreover, in this case, is it true then that $H^0(X,mathcalF)$ is a free $mathbbZ_p$-module?" The answers to both of these questions being yes by the above.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Great answer, thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – user1728
            Apr 4 at 21:13












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172136%2fare-the-global-sections-of-a-flat-sheaf-over-a-discrete-valuation-ring-a-free-mo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0





          +100







          $begingroup$

          $newcommandSpecmathrmSpec$$newcommandZmathbbZ$$newcommandQmathbbQ$I don't have Hartshorne on me, but I assume that the cited section is on proper base change/semi-continuity.



          Since $f:Xto Spec(Z_p)$ is proper, $mathcalF$ is $Z_p$-flat and coherent, and $S$ and $X$ are Noetherian then we know that the map $f_i:Spec(Z_p)to Z$ given by $smapsto dim_k(s)H^i(X_k(s),mathcalF_k(s))$ is upper semi-continuous for all $igeqslant 0$. In particular since $f_1$ is upper semi-continuous we know that $f^-1((-infty,1))$ is an open subset of $Spec(mathbbZ_p)$. Since you're assuming that $pin f^-1((-1,infty))$ you can deduce that $Spec(Z_p)=f^-1((-infty,1))$ since the only open subset of $Spec(Z_p)$ containing $p$ is $Spec(Z_p)$. Thus, $H^1(X_Q_p,mathcalF_Q_p)=0$.



          Now, since $Spec(Z_p)$ is connected and reduced we can use the same theory to show that since $f_1$ is constant that $R^1 f_astmathcalF$ is locally free and, moreover, that we have an isomorphism $(R^1 f_astmathcalF)_k(s)cong H^1(X_k(s),mathcalF_k(s))=0$ for all $s$ so that $R^1 f_astmathcalF=0$.



          EDIT: To answer your other question, it is true that $H^0(X,mathcalF)$ is a free $Z_p$-module. This is more sophisticated though (I don't think it's in Hartshorne?) but it's a classical result that follows from things written in Mumford's book on abelian varieties. I found a reference here in the form of Corollary 2.3.



          Indeed, since $Spec(Z_p)$ is affine we know that $f_ast mathcalF=widetildeH^0(X,mathcalF)$ (see the second edit below) and so the claim you want to prove is that $f_ast mathcalF$ is locally free. This is then what's stated in the cited notes of Osserman.



          EDIT EDIT: Just to point out that in your response to "I don't understand what $R^i f_astmathcalF$ is really" note that if you have a reasonable map (qcqs probably?) $f:XtoSpec(A)$ then $H^i(X,mathcalF)$ is an $A$-module and $R^if_astmathcalF$ is just the quasi-coherent sheaf $widetildeH^i(X,mathcalF)$. All of the above is then by way of asking questions like "Is it true that if $H^1(X,mathcalF)otimes_mathbbZ_pmathbbF_p=0$ that $H^1(X,mathcalF)=0$? Moreover, in this case, is it true then that $H^0(X,mathcalF)$ is a free $mathbbZ_p$-module?" The answers to both of these questions being yes by the above.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Great answer, thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – user1728
            Apr 4 at 21:13
















          0





          +100







          $begingroup$

          $newcommandSpecmathrmSpec$$newcommandZmathbbZ$$newcommandQmathbbQ$I don't have Hartshorne on me, but I assume that the cited section is on proper base change/semi-continuity.



          Since $f:Xto Spec(Z_p)$ is proper, $mathcalF$ is $Z_p$-flat and coherent, and $S$ and $X$ are Noetherian then we know that the map $f_i:Spec(Z_p)to Z$ given by $smapsto dim_k(s)H^i(X_k(s),mathcalF_k(s))$ is upper semi-continuous for all $igeqslant 0$. In particular since $f_1$ is upper semi-continuous we know that $f^-1((-infty,1))$ is an open subset of $Spec(mathbbZ_p)$. Since you're assuming that $pin f^-1((-1,infty))$ you can deduce that $Spec(Z_p)=f^-1((-infty,1))$ since the only open subset of $Spec(Z_p)$ containing $p$ is $Spec(Z_p)$. Thus, $H^1(X_Q_p,mathcalF_Q_p)=0$.



          Now, since $Spec(Z_p)$ is connected and reduced we can use the same theory to show that since $f_1$ is constant that $R^1 f_astmathcalF$ is locally free and, moreover, that we have an isomorphism $(R^1 f_astmathcalF)_k(s)cong H^1(X_k(s),mathcalF_k(s))=0$ for all $s$ so that $R^1 f_astmathcalF=0$.



          EDIT: To answer your other question, it is true that $H^0(X,mathcalF)$ is a free $Z_p$-module. This is more sophisticated though (I don't think it's in Hartshorne?) but it's a classical result that follows from things written in Mumford's book on abelian varieties. I found a reference here in the form of Corollary 2.3.



          Indeed, since $Spec(Z_p)$ is affine we know that $f_ast mathcalF=widetildeH^0(X,mathcalF)$ (see the second edit below) and so the claim you want to prove is that $f_ast mathcalF$ is locally free. This is then what's stated in the cited notes of Osserman.



          EDIT EDIT: Just to point out that in your response to "I don't understand what $R^i f_astmathcalF$ is really" note that if you have a reasonable map (qcqs probably?) $f:XtoSpec(A)$ then $H^i(X,mathcalF)$ is an $A$-module and $R^if_astmathcalF$ is just the quasi-coherent sheaf $widetildeH^i(X,mathcalF)$. All of the above is then by way of asking questions like "Is it true that if $H^1(X,mathcalF)otimes_mathbbZ_pmathbbF_p=0$ that $H^1(X,mathcalF)=0$? Moreover, in this case, is it true then that $H^0(X,mathcalF)$ is a free $mathbbZ_p$-module?" The answers to both of these questions being yes by the above.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Great answer, thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – user1728
            Apr 4 at 21:13














          0





          +100







          0





          +100



          0




          +100



          $begingroup$

          $newcommandSpecmathrmSpec$$newcommandZmathbbZ$$newcommandQmathbbQ$I don't have Hartshorne on me, but I assume that the cited section is on proper base change/semi-continuity.



          Since $f:Xto Spec(Z_p)$ is proper, $mathcalF$ is $Z_p$-flat and coherent, and $S$ and $X$ are Noetherian then we know that the map $f_i:Spec(Z_p)to Z$ given by $smapsto dim_k(s)H^i(X_k(s),mathcalF_k(s))$ is upper semi-continuous for all $igeqslant 0$. In particular since $f_1$ is upper semi-continuous we know that $f^-1((-infty,1))$ is an open subset of $Spec(mathbbZ_p)$. Since you're assuming that $pin f^-1((-1,infty))$ you can deduce that $Spec(Z_p)=f^-1((-infty,1))$ since the only open subset of $Spec(Z_p)$ containing $p$ is $Spec(Z_p)$. Thus, $H^1(X_Q_p,mathcalF_Q_p)=0$.



          Now, since $Spec(Z_p)$ is connected and reduced we can use the same theory to show that since $f_1$ is constant that $R^1 f_astmathcalF$ is locally free and, moreover, that we have an isomorphism $(R^1 f_astmathcalF)_k(s)cong H^1(X_k(s),mathcalF_k(s))=0$ for all $s$ so that $R^1 f_astmathcalF=0$.



          EDIT: To answer your other question, it is true that $H^0(X,mathcalF)$ is a free $Z_p$-module. This is more sophisticated though (I don't think it's in Hartshorne?) but it's a classical result that follows from things written in Mumford's book on abelian varieties. I found a reference here in the form of Corollary 2.3.



          Indeed, since $Spec(Z_p)$ is affine we know that $f_ast mathcalF=widetildeH^0(X,mathcalF)$ (see the second edit below) and so the claim you want to prove is that $f_ast mathcalF$ is locally free. This is then what's stated in the cited notes of Osserman.



          EDIT EDIT: Just to point out that in your response to "I don't understand what $R^i f_astmathcalF$ is really" note that if you have a reasonable map (qcqs probably?) $f:XtoSpec(A)$ then $H^i(X,mathcalF)$ is an $A$-module and $R^if_astmathcalF$ is just the quasi-coherent sheaf $widetildeH^i(X,mathcalF)$. All of the above is then by way of asking questions like "Is it true that if $H^1(X,mathcalF)otimes_mathbbZ_pmathbbF_p=0$ that $H^1(X,mathcalF)=0$? Moreover, in this case, is it true then that $H^0(X,mathcalF)$ is a free $mathbbZ_p$-module?" The answers to both of these questions being yes by the above.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          $newcommandSpecmathrmSpec$$newcommandZmathbbZ$$newcommandQmathbbQ$I don't have Hartshorne on me, but I assume that the cited section is on proper base change/semi-continuity.



          Since $f:Xto Spec(Z_p)$ is proper, $mathcalF$ is $Z_p$-flat and coherent, and $S$ and $X$ are Noetherian then we know that the map $f_i:Spec(Z_p)to Z$ given by $smapsto dim_k(s)H^i(X_k(s),mathcalF_k(s))$ is upper semi-continuous for all $igeqslant 0$. In particular since $f_1$ is upper semi-continuous we know that $f^-1((-infty,1))$ is an open subset of $Spec(mathbbZ_p)$. Since you're assuming that $pin f^-1((-1,infty))$ you can deduce that $Spec(Z_p)=f^-1((-infty,1))$ since the only open subset of $Spec(Z_p)$ containing $p$ is $Spec(Z_p)$. Thus, $H^1(X_Q_p,mathcalF_Q_p)=0$.



          Now, since $Spec(Z_p)$ is connected and reduced we can use the same theory to show that since $f_1$ is constant that $R^1 f_astmathcalF$ is locally free and, moreover, that we have an isomorphism $(R^1 f_astmathcalF)_k(s)cong H^1(X_k(s),mathcalF_k(s))=0$ for all $s$ so that $R^1 f_astmathcalF=0$.



          EDIT: To answer your other question, it is true that $H^0(X,mathcalF)$ is a free $Z_p$-module. This is more sophisticated though (I don't think it's in Hartshorne?) but it's a classical result that follows from things written in Mumford's book on abelian varieties. I found a reference here in the form of Corollary 2.3.



          Indeed, since $Spec(Z_p)$ is affine we know that $f_ast mathcalF=widetildeH^0(X,mathcalF)$ (see the second edit below) and so the claim you want to prove is that $f_ast mathcalF$ is locally free. This is then what's stated in the cited notes of Osserman.



          EDIT EDIT: Just to point out that in your response to "I don't understand what $R^i f_astmathcalF$ is really" note that if you have a reasonable map (qcqs probably?) $f:XtoSpec(A)$ then $H^i(X,mathcalF)$ is an $A$-module and $R^if_astmathcalF$ is just the quasi-coherent sheaf $widetildeH^i(X,mathcalF)$. All of the above is then by way of asking questions like "Is it true that if $H^1(X,mathcalF)otimes_mathbbZ_pmathbbF_p=0$ that $H^1(X,mathcalF)=0$? Moreover, in this case, is it true then that $H^0(X,mathcalF)$ is a free $mathbbZ_p$-module?" The answers to both of these questions being yes by the above.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Apr 6 at 5:26

























          answered Apr 4 at 18:16









          Alex YoucisAlex Youcis

          36.8k775115




          36.8k775115











          • $begingroup$
            Great answer, thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – user1728
            Apr 4 at 21:13

















          • $begingroup$
            Great answer, thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – user1728
            Apr 4 at 21:13
















          $begingroup$
          Great answer, thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – user1728
          Apr 4 at 21:13





          $begingroup$
          Great answer, thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – user1728
          Apr 4 at 21:13


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172136%2fare-the-global-sections-of-a-flat-sheaf-over-a-discrete-valuation-ring-a-free-mo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

          Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

          Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ