Sum of non-negative integers less than a given integer?Determine the number of ordered triple $(x, y, z)$ of integer numbers (negatives and positives) satisfying $|x| + |y| + |z| le 6$For an $f:omega_1 to omega_1$, how to prove $alpha = f(alpha)$ for uncountably many $alpha$?All roots of a polynomial lie on a circle.Differential Equation involving Polynomial DiscriminantsFinding cardinality of a set which sum of its elements equal to an integerNumber of ways of writing an integer as a sum of other integersCountability of truth-valued functionsProve that if $A$ is any infinite set, the set of all finite subsets of $A$ has the same cardinality as $A$Bound for a Sum containing a multinomial coefficientAnother proof for impossibility of covering $mathbbR^n$ with a set of varieties of cardinality less than $2^aleph_0$Cardinality of all non-increasing functions from $mathbbN$ to $mathbbN$

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Can someone clarify Hamming's notion of important problems in relation to modern academia?

What is required to make GPS signals available indoors?

files created then deleted at every second in tmp directory

What are the G forces leaving Earth orbit?

Why was the shrink from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)

Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcd

How to install cross-compiler on Ubuntu 18.04?

Sums of two squares in arithmetic progressions

What is an equivalently powerful replacement spell for Yuan-Ti's Suggestion spell?

Do creatures with a speed 0ft., fly 30ft. (hover) ever touch the ground?

How dangerous is XSS

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?

Did 'Cinema Songs' exist during Hiranyakshipu's time?

Bullying boss launched a smear campaign and made me unemployable

How to coordinate airplane tickets?

Send out email when Apex Queueable fails and test it

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

How can a day be of 24 hours?

What is the fastest integer factorization to break RSA?

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

Finding the reason behind the value of the integral.

What is a Samsaran Word™?

How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?



Sum of non-negative integers less than a given integer?


Determine the number of ordered triple $(x, y, z)$ of integer numbers (negatives and positives) satisfying $|x| + |y| + |z| le 6$For an $f:omega_1 to omega_1$, how to prove $alpha = f(alpha)$ for uncountably many $alpha$?All roots of a polynomial lie on a circle.Differential Equation involving Polynomial DiscriminantsFinding cardinality of a set which sum of its elements equal to an integerNumber of ways of writing an integer as a sum of other integersCountability of truth-valued functionsProve that if $A$ is any infinite set, the set of all finite subsets of $A$ has the same cardinality as $A$Bound for a Sum containing a multinomial coefficientAnother proof for impossibility of covering $mathbbR^n$ with a set of varieties of cardinality less than $2^aleph_0$Cardinality of all non-increasing functions from $mathbbN$ to $mathbbN$













0












$begingroup$


Let $N in mathbbZ_geq 0$ and let $alpha = (a_1,...,a_n) in mathbbZ_geq 0^n$.



I am interested in the cardinality of the set $alpha$, where $|alpha| = a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_n$.



Does anyone know how to prove this? I assume there is some sort of combinatorial argument but I'm stuck? Any hints would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan It was supposed to be non-negative integers, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 14:57










  • $begingroup$
    You might be able to adapt the approach from this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 28 at 15:25















0












$begingroup$


Let $N in mathbbZ_geq 0$ and let $alpha = (a_1,...,a_n) in mathbbZ_geq 0^n$.



I am interested in the cardinality of the set $alpha$, where $|alpha| = a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_n$.



Does anyone know how to prove this? I assume there is some sort of combinatorial argument but I'm stuck? Any hints would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan It was supposed to be non-negative integers, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 14:57










  • $begingroup$
    You might be able to adapt the approach from this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 28 at 15:25













0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $N in mathbbZ_geq 0$ and let $alpha = (a_1,...,a_n) in mathbbZ_geq 0^n$.



I am interested in the cardinality of the set $alpha$, where $|alpha| = a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_n$.



Does anyone know how to prove this? I assume there is some sort of combinatorial argument but I'm stuck? Any hints would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $N in mathbbZ_geq 0$ and let $alpha = (a_1,...,a_n) in mathbbZ_geq 0^n$.



I am interested in the cardinality of the set $alpha$, where $|alpha| = a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_n$.



Does anyone know how to prove this? I assume there is some sort of combinatorial argument but I'm stuck? Any hints would be appreciated.







combinatorics elementary-set-theory polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 28 at 14:57







the man

















asked Mar 28 at 14:48









the manthe man

831716




831716











  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan It was supposed to be non-negative integers, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 14:57










  • $begingroup$
    You might be able to adapt the approach from this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 28 at 15:25
















  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan It was supposed to be non-negative integers, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 14:57










  • $begingroup$
    You might be able to adapt the approach from this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 28 at 15:25















$begingroup$
@RossMillikan It was supposed to be non-negative integers, thank you.
$endgroup$
– the man
Mar 28 at 14:57




$begingroup$
@RossMillikan It was supposed to be non-negative integers, thank you.
$endgroup$
– the man
Mar 28 at 14:57












$begingroup$
You might be able to adapt the approach from this answer.
$endgroup$
– robjohn
Mar 28 at 15:25




$begingroup$
You might be able to adapt the approach from this answer.
$endgroup$
– robjohn
Mar 28 at 15:25










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let $A(n, N)$ be your number. Define $A_r(n, N)$ to be the cardinality of the set
$$
alpha
$$

Clearly, we have
$$
A(n, N) = sum_r = 0^N A_r(n, N)
$$

Also, note that by simply removing the last element of $alpha$, we have
$$
A_r(n, r) = A(n-1, N-r)
$$

which is to say
$$
A(n, N) = sum_r = 0^N A(n-1, N-r)
$$

Comparing the sum for $A(n, N)$ and the sum for $A(n, N-1)$, we get
$$
A(n, N) = A(n-1, N) + A(n, N-1)
$$

and we see that these are just relabelled binomial cefficients:
$$
A(n, N) = binomn+NN
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    By the stars and bars method, the number of non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $N$ is $binomN+n -1N$? This is the number you've worked out for the cardinality of my set? But the cardinality of my set must be bigger than this right?
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 15:26










  • $begingroup$
    It must? Have you checked? For $n = 1$ or $n = 2$ it should be a simple thing to count by hand and compare.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 28 at 15:28











  • $begingroup$
    My set includes the case where the non-negative $n$-typles sum to $N$. But it also includes the non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $0,1,...,N-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 15:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @theman You're right. I'm off by 1 somewhere. Let me just recheck my calculations.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 28 at 15:34










  • $begingroup$
    @theman There we go. I had the wrong base case ($n = 0$ is valid, and $A(0,N) = 1$), and also I hadn't looked thoroughly enough at my sums. Now it should be correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 28 at 15:47


















1












$begingroup$

Hint: for $alpha = N$ you are looking for weak compositions of $N$ into $n$ parts. You can solve that with the usual stars and bars argument. Now just sum the number of compositions of $k$ from $0$ to $N$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So, the answer is the value of the sum $sum_k=0^N binomk+n-1n-1$?
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 15:05










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, that is correct
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Mar 28 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    That sum is $binomN+nn$, which matches Arthur's answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 28 at 18:20


















0












$begingroup$

Think of this as putting $N$ items into $n+1$ bins, where $a_1,dots,a_n$ are the contents of the first $n$ bins. Using stars and bars, this gives $binomN+nn$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165978%2fsum-of-non-negative-integers-less-than-a-given-integer%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Let $A(n, N)$ be your number. Define $A_r(n, N)$ to be the cardinality of the set
    $$
    alpha
    $$

    Clearly, we have
    $$
    A(n, N) = sum_r = 0^N A_r(n, N)
    $$

    Also, note that by simply removing the last element of $alpha$, we have
    $$
    A_r(n, r) = A(n-1, N-r)
    $$

    which is to say
    $$
    A(n, N) = sum_r = 0^N A(n-1, N-r)
    $$

    Comparing the sum for $A(n, N)$ and the sum for $A(n, N-1)$, we get
    $$
    A(n, N) = A(n-1, N) + A(n, N-1)
    $$

    and we see that these are just relabelled binomial cefficients:
    $$
    A(n, N) = binomn+NN
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      By the stars and bars method, the number of non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $N$ is $binomN+n -1N$? This is the number you've worked out for the cardinality of my set? But the cardinality of my set must be bigger than this right?
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:26










    • $begingroup$
      It must? Have you checked? For $n = 1$ or $n = 2$ it should be a simple thing to count by hand and compare.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:28











    • $begingroup$
      My set includes the case where the non-negative $n$-typles sum to $N$. But it also includes the non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $0,1,...,N-1$.
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:29






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @theman You're right. I'm off by 1 somewhere. Let me just recheck my calculations.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:34










    • $begingroup$
      @theman There we go. I had the wrong base case ($n = 0$ is valid, and $A(0,N) = 1$), and also I hadn't looked thoroughly enough at my sums. Now it should be correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:47















    1












    $begingroup$

    Let $A(n, N)$ be your number. Define $A_r(n, N)$ to be the cardinality of the set
    $$
    alpha
    $$

    Clearly, we have
    $$
    A(n, N) = sum_r = 0^N A_r(n, N)
    $$

    Also, note that by simply removing the last element of $alpha$, we have
    $$
    A_r(n, r) = A(n-1, N-r)
    $$

    which is to say
    $$
    A(n, N) = sum_r = 0^N A(n-1, N-r)
    $$

    Comparing the sum for $A(n, N)$ and the sum for $A(n, N-1)$, we get
    $$
    A(n, N) = A(n-1, N) + A(n, N-1)
    $$

    and we see that these are just relabelled binomial cefficients:
    $$
    A(n, N) = binomn+NN
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      By the stars and bars method, the number of non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $N$ is $binomN+n -1N$? This is the number you've worked out for the cardinality of my set? But the cardinality of my set must be bigger than this right?
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:26










    • $begingroup$
      It must? Have you checked? For $n = 1$ or $n = 2$ it should be a simple thing to count by hand and compare.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:28











    • $begingroup$
      My set includes the case where the non-negative $n$-typles sum to $N$. But it also includes the non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $0,1,...,N-1$.
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:29






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @theman You're right. I'm off by 1 somewhere. Let me just recheck my calculations.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:34










    • $begingroup$
      @theman There we go. I had the wrong base case ($n = 0$ is valid, and $A(0,N) = 1$), and also I hadn't looked thoroughly enough at my sums. Now it should be correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:47













    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Let $A(n, N)$ be your number. Define $A_r(n, N)$ to be the cardinality of the set
    $$
    alpha
    $$

    Clearly, we have
    $$
    A(n, N) = sum_r = 0^N A_r(n, N)
    $$

    Also, note that by simply removing the last element of $alpha$, we have
    $$
    A_r(n, r) = A(n-1, N-r)
    $$

    which is to say
    $$
    A(n, N) = sum_r = 0^N A(n-1, N-r)
    $$

    Comparing the sum for $A(n, N)$ and the sum for $A(n, N-1)$, we get
    $$
    A(n, N) = A(n-1, N) + A(n, N-1)
    $$

    and we see that these are just relabelled binomial cefficients:
    $$
    A(n, N) = binomn+NN
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Let $A(n, N)$ be your number. Define $A_r(n, N)$ to be the cardinality of the set
    $$
    alpha
    $$

    Clearly, we have
    $$
    A(n, N) = sum_r = 0^N A_r(n, N)
    $$

    Also, note that by simply removing the last element of $alpha$, we have
    $$
    A_r(n, r) = A(n-1, N-r)
    $$

    which is to say
    $$
    A(n, N) = sum_r = 0^N A(n-1, N-r)
    $$

    Comparing the sum for $A(n, N)$ and the sum for $A(n, N-1)$, we get
    $$
    A(n, N) = A(n-1, N) + A(n, N-1)
    $$

    and we see that these are just relabelled binomial cefficients:
    $$
    A(n, N) = binomn+NN
    $$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Mar 28 at 15:46

























    answered Mar 28 at 15:07









    ArthurArthur

    121k7122208




    121k7122208











    • $begingroup$
      By the stars and bars method, the number of non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $N$ is $binomN+n -1N$? This is the number you've worked out for the cardinality of my set? But the cardinality of my set must be bigger than this right?
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:26










    • $begingroup$
      It must? Have you checked? For $n = 1$ or $n = 2$ it should be a simple thing to count by hand and compare.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:28











    • $begingroup$
      My set includes the case where the non-negative $n$-typles sum to $N$. But it also includes the non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $0,1,...,N-1$.
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:29






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @theman You're right. I'm off by 1 somewhere. Let me just recheck my calculations.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:34










    • $begingroup$
      @theman There we go. I had the wrong base case ($n = 0$ is valid, and $A(0,N) = 1$), and also I hadn't looked thoroughly enough at my sums. Now it should be correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:47
















    • $begingroup$
      By the stars and bars method, the number of non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $N$ is $binomN+n -1N$? This is the number you've worked out for the cardinality of my set? But the cardinality of my set must be bigger than this right?
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:26










    • $begingroup$
      It must? Have you checked? For $n = 1$ or $n = 2$ it should be a simple thing to count by hand and compare.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:28











    • $begingroup$
      My set includes the case where the non-negative $n$-typles sum to $N$. But it also includes the non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $0,1,...,N-1$.
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:29






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @theman You're right. I'm off by 1 somewhere. Let me just recheck my calculations.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:34










    • $begingroup$
      @theman There we go. I had the wrong base case ($n = 0$ is valid, and $A(0,N) = 1$), and also I hadn't looked thoroughly enough at my sums. Now it should be correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      Mar 28 at 15:47















    $begingroup$
    By the stars and bars method, the number of non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $N$ is $binomN+n -1N$? This is the number you've worked out for the cardinality of my set? But the cardinality of my set must be bigger than this right?
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 15:26




    $begingroup$
    By the stars and bars method, the number of non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $N$ is $binomN+n -1N$? This is the number you've worked out for the cardinality of my set? But the cardinality of my set must be bigger than this right?
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 15:26












    $begingroup$
    It must? Have you checked? For $n = 1$ or $n = 2$ it should be a simple thing to count by hand and compare.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 28 at 15:28





    $begingroup$
    It must? Have you checked? For $n = 1$ or $n = 2$ it should be a simple thing to count by hand and compare.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 28 at 15:28













    $begingroup$
    My set includes the case where the non-negative $n$-typles sum to $N$. But it also includes the non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $0,1,...,N-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 15:29




    $begingroup$
    My set includes the case where the non-negative $n$-typles sum to $N$. But it also includes the non-negative $n$-tuples which sum to $0,1,...,N-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 15:29




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @theman You're right. I'm off by 1 somewhere. Let me just recheck my calculations.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 28 at 15:34




    $begingroup$
    @theman You're right. I'm off by 1 somewhere. Let me just recheck my calculations.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 28 at 15:34












    $begingroup$
    @theman There we go. I had the wrong base case ($n = 0$ is valid, and $A(0,N) = 1$), and also I hadn't looked thoroughly enough at my sums. Now it should be correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 28 at 15:47




    $begingroup$
    @theman There we go. I had the wrong base case ($n = 0$ is valid, and $A(0,N) = 1$), and also I hadn't looked thoroughly enough at my sums. Now it should be correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 28 at 15:47











    1












    $begingroup$

    Hint: for $alpha = N$ you are looking for weak compositions of $N$ into $n$ parts. You can solve that with the usual stars and bars argument. Now just sum the number of compositions of $k$ from $0$ to $N$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      So, the answer is the value of the sum $sum_k=0^N binomk+n-1n-1$?
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:05










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, that is correct
      $endgroup$
      – Ross Millikan
      Mar 28 at 15:43










    • $begingroup$
      That sum is $binomN+nn$, which matches Arthur's answer.
      $endgroup$
      – robjohn
      Mar 28 at 18:20















    1












    $begingroup$

    Hint: for $alpha = N$ you are looking for weak compositions of $N$ into $n$ parts. You can solve that with the usual stars and bars argument. Now just sum the number of compositions of $k$ from $0$ to $N$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      So, the answer is the value of the sum $sum_k=0^N binomk+n-1n-1$?
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:05










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, that is correct
      $endgroup$
      – Ross Millikan
      Mar 28 at 15:43










    • $begingroup$
      That sum is $binomN+nn$, which matches Arthur's answer.
      $endgroup$
      – robjohn
      Mar 28 at 18:20













    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Hint: for $alpha = N$ you are looking for weak compositions of $N$ into $n$ parts. You can solve that with the usual stars and bars argument. Now just sum the number of compositions of $k$ from $0$ to $N$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Hint: for $alpha = N$ you are looking for weak compositions of $N$ into $n$ parts. You can solve that with the usual stars and bars argument. Now just sum the number of compositions of $k$ from $0$ to $N$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Mar 28 at 14:55









    Ross MillikanRoss Millikan

    301k24200375




    301k24200375











    • $begingroup$
      So, the answer is the value of the sum $sum_k=0^N binomk+n-1n-1$?
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:05










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, that is correct
      $endgroup$
      – Ross Millikan
      Mar 28 at 15:43










    • $begingroup$
      That sum is $binomN+nn$, which matches Arthur's answer.
      $endgroup$
      – robjohn
      Mar 28 at 18:20
















    • $begingroup$
      So, the answer is the value of the sum $sum_k=0^N binomk+n-1n-1$?
      $endgroup$
      – the man
      Mar 28 at 15:05










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, that is correct
      $endgroup$
      – Ross Millikan
      Mar 28 at 15:43










    • $begingroup$
      That sum is $binomN+nn$, which matches Arthur's answer.
      $endgroup$
      – robjohn
      Mar 28 at 18:20















    $begingroup$
    So, the answer is the value of the sum $sum_k=0^N binomk+n-1n-1$?
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 15:05




    $begingroup$
    So, the answer is the value of the sum $sum_k=0^N binomk+n-1n-1$?
    $endgroup$
    – the man
    Mar 28 at 15:05












    $begingroup$
    Yes, that is correct
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Mar 28 at 15:43




    $begingroup$
    Yes, that is correct
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Mar 28 at 15:43












    $begingroup$
    That sum is $binomN+nn$, which matches Arthur's answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 28 at 18:20




    $begingroup$
    That sum is $binomN+nn$, which matches Arthur's answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 28 at 18:20











    0












    $begingroup$

    Think of this as putting $N$ items into $n+1$ bins, where $a_1,dots,a_n$ are the contents of the first $n$ bins. Using stars and bars, this gives $binomN+nn$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      Think of this as putting $N$ items into $n+1$ bins, where $a_1,dots,a_n$ are the contents of the first $n$ bins. Using stars and bars, this gives $binomN+nn$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Think of this as putting $N$ items into $n+1$ bins, where $a_1,dots,a_n$ are the contents of the first $n$ bins. Using stars and bars, this gives $binomN+nn$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Think of this as putting $N$ items into $n+1$ bins, where $a_1,dots,a_n$ are the contents of the first $n$ bins. Using stars and bars, this gives $binomN+nn$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 28 at 18:34









        robjohnrobjohn

        270k27312640




        270k27312640



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165978%2fsum-of-non-negative-integers-less-than-a-given-integer%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

            Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O

            Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleaguesHow can I better understand manager or clients with strong accents?Adding more movement and speech at the fundamental level to a highly-sedentary job?Difficulty in understanding Manager's accent(language and communication)How to adjust yourself where your colleagues are not understanding to you?Understanding manager's expectationsForeigner and colleagues using slangHaving difficulty understanding meetingsHow do you breathe when giving a speech?Trouble Waking Up for Emergencies (On-Call)Problems with colleaguesColleagues feeling insecure when I do my work