Does an n x n matrix A have a ker(A) = 0 no matter what even if A represents linear transformation?Matrix of Linear Transformation Involving Derivatives?Matrix of T, a linear transformation when Im T = Ker TFinding the transformation matrix of this linear map.Prove the size of a linear transformation matrixRepresenting a Linear Transformation as a MatrixWhat does vector mean in Linear Algebra?Basis for Ker(T), Range(T) of Linear Transformation without the MatrixFind $mathrmKer(T)$ and $mathrmIm(T)$ of the following linear transformation with basesKernel and image of a matrix converting linear transformationWhat formula can make a non-linear transformation into a matrix transformation?

Implication of namely

How do I exit BASH while loop using modulus operator?

Calculate the Mean mean of two numbers

What's the meaning of "Sollensaussagen"?

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

What does the same-ish mean?

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcd

Finitely generated matrix groups whose eigenvalues are all algebraic

OP Amp not amplifying audio signal

Why do I get negative height?

Do Iron Man suits sport waste management systems?

Sums of two squares in arithmetic progressions

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

Standard deduction V. mortgage interest deduction - is it basically only for the rich?

What do you call someone who asks many questions?

Why are UK visa biometrics appointments suspended at USCIS Application Support Centers?

How to coordinate airplane tickets?

Could neural networks be considered metaheuristics?

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

Does int main() need a declaration on C++?

What Exploit Are These User Agents Trying to Use?



Does an n x n matrix A have a ker(A) = 0 no matter what even if A represents linear transformation?


Matrix of Linear Transformation Involving Derivatives?Matrix of T, a linear transformation when Im T = Ker TFinding the transformation matrix of this linear map.Prove the size of a linear transformation matrixRepresenting a Linear Transformation as a MatrixWhat does vector mean in Linear Algebra?Basis for Ker(T), Range(T) of Linear Transformation without the MatrixFind $mathrmKer(T)$ and $mathrmIm(T)$ of the following linear transformation with basesKernel and image of a matrix converting linear transformationWhat formula can make a non-linear transformation into a matrix transformation?













0












$begingroup$


In my textbook there is a theorem that says that because n x n matrices are inversible they have a bunch of proprieties. One of them that is the that Ker A = 0.



However I was doing a practice problem where there was n x n matrix representing a linear transformation and when I tried to solve Ax = 0 it didn't give me that Ker A = 0 and it was the correct answer.



Is there some sort of further conditon for nxn matrix to automatically have a Ker A = 0?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Dr.Stone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $0 leq dim(ker(A)) leq n$, depending on how many linearly independent columns there are.
    $endgroup$
    – Hyperion
    Mar 28 at 15:06
















0












$begingroup$


In my textbook there is a theorem that says that because n x n matrices are inversible they have a bunch of proprieties. One of them that is the that Ker A = 0.



However I was doing a practice problem where there was n x n matrix representing a linear transformation and when I tried to solve Ax = 0 it didn't give me that Ker A = 0 and it was the correct answer.



Is there some sort of further conditon for nxn matrix to automatically have a Ker A = 0?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Dr.Stone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $0 leq dim(ker(A)) leq n$, depending on how many linearly independent columns there are.
    $endgroup$
    – Hyperion
    Mar 28 at 15:06














0












0








0





$begingroup$


In my textbook there is a theorem that says that because n x n matrices are inversible they have a bunch of proprieties. One of them that is the that Ker A = 0.



However I was doing a practice problem where there was n x n matrix representing a linear transformation and when I tried to solve Ax = 0 it didn't give me that Ker A = 0 and it was the correct answer.



Is there some sort of further conditon for nxn matrix to automatically have a Ker A = 0?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Dr.Stone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




In my textbook there is a theorem that says that because n x n matrices are inversible they have a bunch of proprieties. One of them that is the that Ker A = 0.



However I was doing a practice problem where there was n x n matrix representing a linear transformation and when I tried to solve Ax = 0 it didn't give me that Ker A = 0 and it was the correct answer.



Is there some sort of further conditon for nxn matrix to automatically have a Ker A = 0?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Dr.Stone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Dr.Stone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Dr.Stone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 28 at 14:54









Dr.StoneDr.Stone

335




335




New contributor




Dr.Stone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Dr.Stone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Dr.Stone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $0 leq dim(ker(A)) leq n$, depending on how many linearly independent columns there are.
    $endgroup$
    – Hyperion
    Mar 28 at 15:06













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $0 leq dim(ker(A)) leq n$, depending on how many linearly independent columns there are.
    $endgroup$
    – Hyperion
    Mar 28 at 15:06








1




1




$begingroup$
$0 leq dim(ker(A)) leq n$, depending on how many linearly independent columns there are.
$endgroup$
– Hyperion
Mar 28 at 15:06





$begingroup$
$0 leq dim(ker(A)) leq n$, depending on how many linearly independent columns there are.
$endgroup$
– Hyperion
Mar 28 at 15:06











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$


because n x n matrices are inversible




and




But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?




Here's the problem: not all $ntimes n$-matrices are invertible.



However: if an $ntimes n$-matrix is invertible, then its kernel contains only the zero vector and vice versa; so those two properties are equivalent. This also means that if an $ntimes n$-matrix is not invertible, the kernel will contain more than only the zero vector (and vice versa!).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    For a $n times n$ matrix $A,$ $text Ker (A) = 0 $ if and only if $A$ is invertible.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?
      $endgroup$
      – Dr.Stone
      Mar 28 at 15:01






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Nope. Take $n=2.$ Consider the $2 times 2$ matrix $$A=beginpmatrix 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix.$$ Is $A$ invertible?
      $endgroup$
      – Dbchatto67
      Mar 28 at 15:03











    • $begingroup$
      Ah ok, I see now.
      $endgroup$
      – Dr.Stone
      Mar 28 at 15:05











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Dr.Stone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165987%2fdoes-an-n-x-n-matrix-a-have-a-kera-0-no-matter-what-even-if-a-represents-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$


    because n x n matrices are inversible




    and




    But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?




    Here's the problem: not all $ntimes n$-matrices are invertible.



    However: if an $ntimes n$-matrix is invertible, then its kernel contains only the zero vector and vice versa; so those two properties are equivalent. This also means that if an $ntimes n$-matrix is not invertible, the kernel will contain more than only the zero vector (and vice versa!).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$


      because n x n matrices are inversible




      and




      But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?




      Here's the problem: not all $ntimes n$-matrices are invertible.



      However: if an $ntimes n$-matrix is invertible, then its kernel contains only the zero vector and vice versa; so those two properties are equivalent. This also means that if an $ntimes n$-matrix is not invertible, the kernel will contain more than only the zero vector (and vice versa!).






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$


        because n x n matrices are inversible




        and




        But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?




        Here's the problem: not all $ntimes n$-matrices are invertible.



        However: if an $ntimes n$-matrix is invertible, then its kernel contains only the zero vector and vice versa; so those two properties are equivalent. This also means that if an $ntimes n$-matrix is not invertible, the kernel will contain more than only the zero vector (and vice versa!).






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




        because n x n matrices are inversible




        and




        But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?




        Here's the problem: not all $ntimes n$-matrices are invertible.



        However: if an $ntimes n$-matrix is invertible, then its kernel contains only the zero vector and vice versa; so those two properties are equivalent. This also means that if an $ntimes n$-matrix is not invertible, the kernel will contain more than only the zero vector (and vice versa!).







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 28 at 15:04









        StackTDStackTD

        24.3k2254




        24.3k2254





















            2












            $begingroup$

            For a $n times n$ matrix $A,$ $text Ker (A) = 0 $ if and only if $A$ is invertible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?
              $endgroup$
              – Dr.Stone
              Mar 28 at 15:01






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nope. Take $n=2.$ Consider the $2 times 2$ matrix $$A=beginpmatrix 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix.$$ Is $A$ invertible?
              $endgroup$
              – Dbchatto67
              Mar 28 at 15:03











            • $begingroup$
              Ah ok, I see now.
              $endgroup$
              – Dr.Stone
              Mar 28 at 15:05















            2












            $begingroup$

            For a $n times n$ matrix $A,$ $text Ker (A) = 0 $ if and only if $A$ is invertible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?
              $endgroup$
              – Dr.Stone
              Mar 28 at 15:01






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nope. Take $n=2.$ Consider the $2 times 2$ matrix $$A=beginpmatrix 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix.$$ Is $A$ invertible?
              $endgroup$
              – Dbchatto67
              Mar 28 at 15:03











            • $begingroup$
              Ah ok, I see now.
              $endgroup$
              – Dr.Stone
              Mar 28 at 15:05













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            For a $n times n$ matrix $A,$ $text Ker (A) = 0 $ if and only if $A$ is invertible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            For a $n times n$ matrix $A,$ $text Ker (A) = 0 $ if and only if $A$ is invertible.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 28 at 14:56









            Dbchatto67Dbchatto67

            2,445522




            2,445522











            • $begingroup$
              But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?
              $endgroup$
              – Dr.Stone
              Mar 28 at 15:01






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nope. Take $n=2.$ Consider the $2 times 2$ matrix $$A=beginpmatrix 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix.$$ Is $A$ invertible?
              $endgroup$
              – Dbchatto67
              Mar 28 at 15:03











            • $begingroup$
              Ah ok, I see now.
              $endgroup$
              – Dr.Stone
              Mar 28 at 15:05
















            • $begingroup$
              But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?
              $endgroup$
              – Dr.Stone
              Mar 28 at 15:01






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nope. Take $n=2.$ Consider the $2 times 2$ matrix $$A=beginpmatrix 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix.$$ Is $A$ invertible?
              $endgroup$
              – Dbchatto67
              Mar 28 at 15:03











            • $begingroup$
              Ah ok, I see now.
              $endgroup$
              – Dr.Stone
              Mar 28 at 15:05















            $begingroup$
            But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?
            $endgroup$
            – Dr.Stone
            Mar 28 at 15:01




            $begingroup$
            But doesn't the fact that A is n x n matrix implies that it is invertible?
            $endgroup$
            – Dr.Stone
            Mar 28 at 15:01




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Nope. Take $n=2.$ Consider the $2 times 2$ matrix $$A=beginpmatrix 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix.$$ Is $A$ invertible?
            $endgroup$
            – Dbchatto67
            Mar 28 at 15:03





            $begingroup$
            Nope. Take $n=2.$ Consider the $2 times 2$ matrix $$A=beginpmatrix 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix.$$ Is $A$ invertible?
            $endgroup$
            – Dbchatto67
            Mar 28 at 15:03













            $begingroup$
            Ah ok, I see now.
            $endgroup$
            – Dr.Stone
            Mar 28 at 15:05




            $begingroup$
            Ah ok, I see now.
            $endgroup$
            – Dr.Stone
            Mar 28 at 15:05










            Dr.Stone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Dr.Stone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Dr.Stone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Dr.Stone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165987%2fdoes-an-n-x-n-matrix-a-have-a-kera-0-no-matter-what-even-if-a-represents-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

            Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

            Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ