Solution to this second order linear differential equation with variable coefficients The Next CEO of Stack OverflowA second-order non-linear differential equationSecond order linear differential equationSecond order homogeneous differential equation with non-constant coefficientsParticular second order differential equation with variable coefficientssecond order linear differential equation with variable coefficientsSecond order linear homogeneous differential equation with variable coefficientsSolving a 2-variable Second Order Linear Partial Differential EquationSecond order linear partial differential equation with complex coefficients.Solving Second Order differential equation using Variation of ParametersSecond order homogenous differential equation with variable coefficients
Is the offspring between a demon and a celestial possible? If so what is it called and is it in a book somewhere?
Prodigo = pro + ago?
Why do we say “un seul M” and not “une seule M” even though M is a “consonne”?
Free fall ellipse or parabola?
What did the word "leisure" mean in late 18th Century usage?
Is a linearly independent set whose span is dense a Schauder basis?
Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico
Find the majority element, which appears more than half the time
Read/write a pipe-delimited file line by line with some simple text manipulation
How can I separate the number from the unit in argument?
Which acid/base does a strong base/acid react when added to a buffer solution?
Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?
Identify and count spells (Distinctive events within each group)
How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?
How can a day be of 24 hours?
How to find if SQL server backup is encrypted with TDE without restoring the backup
How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?
Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees?
What is the difference between 'contrib' and 'non-free' packages repositories?
Is it correct to say moon starry nights?
Compensation for working overtime on Saturdays
Can a PhD from a non-TU9 German university become a professor in a TU9 university?
Calculate the Mean mean of two numbers
Is it possible to create a QR code using text?
Solution to this second order linear differential equation with variable coefficients
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowA second-order non-linear differential equationSecond order linear differential equationSecond order homogeneous differential equation with non-constant coefficientsParticular second order differential equation with variable coefficientssecond order linear differential equation with variable coefficientsSecond order linear homogeneous differential equation with variable coefficientsSolving a 2-variable Second Order Linear Partial Differential EquationSecond order linear partial differential equation with complex coefficients.Solving Second Order differential equation using Variation of ParametersSecond order homogenous differential equation with variable coefficients
$begingroup$
I have the following second order linear ordinary differential equation with variable coefficients:
$ c fracd^2 overlinevarphid E^2 + aE^k fracd overlinevarphid E + (akE^k-1 +s)overlinevarphi = varphi(E,0)$, where $overlinevarphi = overlinevarphi(E,s) = int_0^infty varphi(E,x)e^-sxdx$.
Before I actually show how I tried to solve this, it is perhaps good if I provide some background. This equation is obtained by taking the Laplace transform in the x variable of the following second order partial differential equation:
$c cdot fracpartial^2 varphi(E,x)partial E^2 + aE^k cdot fracpartial varphi(E,x)partial E + akE^k-1 cdot varphi + fracpartial varphipartial x = 0 $ where $E in (infty,+infty) , xin(0,infty)$ .
Coming back to the first equation, in order to solve this I have attempted to reduce this to an equation with constant coefficients, by following this document: http://www.mecheng.iisc.ernet.in/~sonti/ME261_variable_coeff_2nd_order.pdf.
However, when calculating whether the equation is exact, via the $P''-Q'+R$ formula, the result is the $s $ constant. Thus, I have concluded that the equation cannot be reduced to an equation with constant coefficients.
I have also tried using the variation of parameters on the equation. This was mostly by following the method given here: http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/VariationofParameters.aspx
However, that requires knowledge of the fundamental solutions of the equation. The fundamental solutions are obtained by solving the following equation:
$ c fracd^2 overlinevarphid E^2 + aE^k fracd overlinevarphid E + (akE^k-1 +s)overlinevarphi = 0$
I attempted thereafter to solve the following polynomial:
$cr^2+aE^kr+(akE^k-1+s)=0$
The constants in the equation are: $c = 0.1/2$, $a = e^148$ and $k = -1.4$. When I plotted the delta from the well known abc formula it always turned out positive. So I have concluded that the roots of the equation are real and thus the fundamental solutions are
$overlinevarphi_1 = e^Er_1(s)$ and $overlinevarphi_2 = e^Er_2(s)$, with $r_1$ and $r_2$ the roots of the characteristic polynomial.
Thus, the variation of parameters method states that the solution to this equation is:
$overlinevarphi(E,s) = -overlinevarphi_1 int_0^infty fracoverlinevarphi_2varphi(E,0)W(overlinevarphi_1,overlinevarphi_2) + overlinevarphi_2 int_0^infty fracoverlinevarphi_1varphi(E,0)W(overlinevarphi_1,overlinevarphi_2)$
Using this the solution to the original PDE can be obtained via:
$varphi(E,x) = frac12pi iint_gamma-iinfty^gamma+iinfty overlinevarphi(E,s)e^sxds$
So, my questions are:
- Does the first equation in the post have an analytical solution?
- Is my treatment correct?
- Do you have suggestions for improvements/ alternative methods?
Thank you in advance
ordinary-differential-equations pde laplace-transform
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have the following second order linear ordinary differential equation with variable coefficients:
$ c fracd^2 overlinevarphid E^2 + aE^k fracd overlinevarphid E + (akE^k-1 +s)overlinevarphi = varphi(E,0)$, where $overlinevarphi = overlinevarphi(E,s) = int_0^infty varphi(E,x)e^-sxdx$.
Before I actually show how I tried to solve this, it is perhaps good if I provide some background. This equation is obtained by taking the Laplace transform in the x variable of the following second order partial differential equation:
$c cdot fracpartial^2 varphi(E,x)partial E^2 + aE^k cdot fracpartial varphi(E,x)partial E + akE^k-1 cdot varphi + fracpartial varphipartial x = 0 $ where $E in (infty,+infty) , xin(0,infty)$ .
Coming back to the first equation, in order to solve this I have attempted to reduce this to an equation with constant coefficients, by following this document: http://www.mecheng.iisc.ernet.in/~sonti/ME261_variable_coeff_2nd_order.pdf.
However, when calculating whether the equation is exact, via the $P''-Q'+R$ formula, the result is the $s $ constant. Thus, I have concluded that the equation cannot be reduced to an equation with constant coefficients.
I have also tried using the variation of parameters on the equation. This was mostly by following the method given here: http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/VariationofParameters.aspx
However, that requires knowledge of the fundamental solutions of the equation. The fundamental solutions are obtained by solving the following equation:
$ c fracd^2 overlinevarphid E^2 + aE^k fracd overlinevarphid E + (akE^k-1 +s)overlinevarphi = 0$
I attempted thereafter to solve the following polynomial:
$cr^2+aE^kr+(akE^k-1+s)=0$
The constants in the equation are: $c = 0.1/2$, $a = e^148$ and $k = -1.4$. When I plotted the delta from the well known abc formula it always turned out positive. So I have concluded that the roots of the equation are real and thus the fundamental solutions are
$overlinevarphi_1 = e^Er_1(s)$ and $overlinevarphi_2 = e^Er_2(s)$, with $r_1$ and $r_2$ the roots of the characteristic polynomial.
Thus, the variation of parameters method states that the solution to this equation is:
$overlinevarphi(E,s) = -overlinevarphi_1 int_0^infty fracoverlinevarphi_2varphi(E,0)W(overlinevarphi_1,overlinevarphi_2) + overlinevarphi_2 int_0^infty fracoverlinevarphi_1varphi(E,0)W(overlinevarphi_1,overlinevarphi_2)$
Using this the solution to the original PDE can be obtained via:
$varphi(E,x) = frac12pi iint_gamma-iinfty^gamma+iinfty overlinevarphi(E,s)e^sxds$
So, my questions are:
- Does the first equation in the post have an analytical solution?
- Is my treatment correct?
- Do you have suggestions for improvements/ alternative methods?
Thank you in advance
ordinary-differential-equations pde laplace-transform
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have the following second order linear ordinary differential equation with variable coefficients:
$ c fracd^2 overlinevarphid E^2 + aE^k fracd overlinevarphid E + (akE^k-1 +s)overlinevarphi = varphi(E,0)$, where $overlinevarphi = overlinevarphi(E,s) = int_0^infty varphi(E,x)e^-sxdx$.
Before I actually show how I tried to solve this, it is perhaps good if I provide some background. This equation is obtained by taking the Laplace transform in the x variable of the following second order partial differential equation:
$c cdot fracpartial^2 varphi(E,x)partial E^2 + aE^k cdot fracpartial varphi(E,x)partial E + akE^k-1 cdot varphi + fracpartial varphipartial x = 0 $ where $E in (infty,+infty) , xin(0,infty)$ .
Coming back to the first equation, in order to solve this I have attempted to reduce this to an equation with constant coefficients, by following this document: http://www.mecheng.iisc.ernet.in/~sonti/ME261_variable_coeff_2nd_order.pdf.
However, when calculating whether the equation is exact, via the $P''-Q'+R$ formula, the result is the $s $ constant. Thus, I have concluded that the equation cannot be reduced to an equation with constant coefficients.
I have also tried using the variation of parameters on the equation. This was mostly by following the method given here: http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/VariationofParameters.aspx
However, that requires knowledge of the fundamental solutions of the equation. The fundamental solutions are obtained by solving the following equation:
$ c fracd^2 overlinevarphid E^2 + aE^k fracd overlinevarphid E + (akE^k-1 +s)overlinevarphi = 0$
I attempted thereafter to solve the following polynomial:
$cr^2+aE^kr+(akE^k-1+s)=0$
The constants in the equation are: $c = 0.1/2$, $a = e^148$ and $k = -1.4$. When I plotted the delta from the well known abc formula it always turned out positive. So I have concluded that the roots of the equation are real and thus the fundamental solutions are
$overlinevarphi_1 = e^Er_1(s)$ and $overlinevarphi_2 = e^Er_2(s)$, with $r_1$ and $r_2$ the roots of the characteristic polynomial.
Thus, the variation of parameters method states that the solution to this equation is:
$overlinevarphi(E,s) = -overlinevarphi_1 int_0^infty fracoverlinevarphi_2varphi(E,0)W(overlinevarphi_1,overlinevarphi_2) + overlinevarphi_2 int_0^infty fracoverlinevarphi_1varphi(E,0)W(overlinevarphi_1,overlinevarphi_2)$
Using this the solution to the original PDE can be obtained via:
$varphi(E,x) = frac12pi iint_gamma-iinfty^gamma+iinfty overlinevarphi(E,s)e^sxds$
So, my questions are:
- Does the first equation in the post have an analytical solution?
- Is my treatment correct?
- Do you have suggestions for improvements/ alternative methods?
Thank you in advance
ordinary-differential-equations pde laplace-transform
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have the following second order linear ordinary differential equation with variable coefficients:
$ c fracd^2 overlinevarphid E^2 + aE^k fracd overlinevarphid E + (akE^k-1 +s)overlinevarphi = varphi(E,0)$, where $overlinevarphi = overlinevarphi(E,s) = int_0^infty varphi(E,x)e^-sxdx$.
Before I actually show how I tried to solve this, it is perhaps good if I provide some background. This equation is obtained by taking the Laplace transform in the x variable of the following second order partial differential equation:
$c cdot fracpartial^2 varphi(E,x)partial E^2 + aE^k cdot fracpartial varphi(E,x)partial E + akE^k-1 cdot varphi + fracpartial varphipartial x = 0 $ where $E in (infty,+infty) , xin(0,infty)$ .
Coming back to the first equation, in order to solve this I have attempted to reduce this to an equation with constant coefficients, by following this document: http://www.mecheng.iisc.ernet.in/~sonti/ME261_variable_coeff_2nd_order.pdf.
However, when calculating whether the equation is exact, via the $P''-Q'+R$ formula, the result is the $s $ constant. Thus, I have concluded that the equation cannot be reduced to an equation with constant coefficients.
I have also tried using the variation of parameters on the equation. This was mostly by following the method given here: http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/VariationofParameters.aspx
However, that requires knowledge of the fundamental solutions of the equation. The fundamental solutions are obtained by solving the following equation:
$ c fracd^2 overlinevarphid E^2 + aE^k fracd overlinevarphid E + (akE^k-1 +s)overlinevarphi = 0$
I attempted thereafter to solve the following polynomial:
$cr^2+aE^kr+(akE^k-1+s)=0$
The constants in the equation are: $c = 0.1/2$, $a = e^148$ and $k = -1.4$. When I plotted the delta from the well known abc formula it always turned out positive. So I have concluded that the roots of the equation are real and thus the fundamental solutions are
$overlinevarphi_1 = e^Er_1(s)$ and $overlinevarphi_2 = e^Er_2(s)$, with $r_1$ and $r_2$ the roots of the characteristic polynomial.
Thus, the variation of parameters method states that the solution to this equation is:
$overlinevarphi(E,s) = -overlinevarphi_1 int_0^infty fracoverlinevarphi_2varphi(E,0)W(overlinevarphi_1,overlinevarphi_2) + overlinevarphi_2 int_0^infty fracoverlinevarphi_1varphi(E,0)W(overlinevarphi_1,overlinevarphi_2)$
Using this the solution to the original PDE can be obtained via:
$varphi(E,x) = frac12pi iint_gamma-iinfty^gamma+iinfty overlinevarphi(E,s)e^sxds$
So, my questions are:
- Does the first equation in the post have an analytical solution?
- Is my treatment correct?
- Do you have suggestions for improvements/ alternative methods?
Thank you in advance
ordinary-differential-equations pde laplace-transform
ordinary-differential-equations pde laplace-transform
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Mar 28 at 10:50
TiberiuTiberiu
211
211
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint:
For $cdfracd^2overlinevarphidE^2+aE^kdfracdoverlinevarphidE+(akE^k-1+s)overlinevarphi=0$ ,
Let $overlinevarphi=e^mEoverline U$ ,
Then $dfracdoverlinevarphidE=e^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEoverline U$
$dfracd^2overlinevarphidE^2=e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline U=e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+2me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline U$
$therefore cleft(e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+2me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline Uright)+aE^kleft(e^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEoverline Uright)+(akE^k-1+s)e^mEoverline U=0$
$cleft(dfracd^2overline UdE^2+2mdfracdoverline UdE+m^2overline Uright)+aE^kleft(dfracdoverline UdE+moverline Uright)+(akE^k-1+s)overline U=0$
$cdfracd^2overline UdE^2+(aE^k+2cm)dfracdoverline UdE+(amE^k+akE^k-1+cm^2+s)overline U=0$
Take $cm^2+s=0$ , i.e. $m=pm isqrtdfracsc$ , the ODE becomes
$cdfracd^2overline UdE^2+(aE^kpm2isqrtcs)dfracdoverline UdE+left(pm iasqrtdfracscE^k+akE^k-1right)overline U=0$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Tiberiu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165729%2fsolution-to-this-second-order-linear-differential-equation-with-variable-coeffic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint:
For $cdfracd^2overlinevarphidE^2+aE^kdfracdoverlinevarphidE+(akE^k-1+s)overlinevarphi=0$ ,
Let $overlinevarphi=e^mEoverline U$ ,
Then $dfracdoverlinevarphidE=e^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEoverline U$
$dfracd^2overlinevarphidE^2=e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline U=e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+2me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline U$
$therefore cleft(e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+2me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline Uright)+aE^kleft(e^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEoverline Uright)+(akE^k-1+s)e^mEoverline U=0$
$cleft(dfracd^2overline UdE^2+2mdfracdoverline UdE+m^2overline Uright)+aE^kleft(dfracdoverline UdE+moverline Uright)+(akE^k-1+s)overline U=0$
$cdfracd^2overline UdE^2+(aE^k+2cm)dfracdoverline UdE+(amE^k+akE^k-1+cm^2+s)overline U=0$
Take $cm^2+s=0$ , i.e. $m=pm isqrtdfracsc$ , the ODE becomes
$cdfracd^2overline UdE^2+(aE^kpm2isqrtcs)dfracdoverline UdE+left(pm iasqrtdfracscE^k+akE^k-1right)overline U=0$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
For $cdfracd^2overlinevarphidE^2+aE^kdfracdoverlinevarphidE+(akE^k-1+s)overlinevarphi=0$ ,
Let $overlinevarphi=e^mEoverline U$ ,
Then $dfracdoverlinevarphidE=e^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEoverline U$
$dfracd^2overlinevarphidE^2=e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline U=e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+2me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline U$
$therefore cleft(e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+2me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline Uright)+aE^kleft(e^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEoverline Uright)+(akE^k-1+s)e^mEoverline U=0$
$cleft(dfracd^2overline UdE^2+2mdfracdoverline UdE+m^2overline Uright)+aE^kleft(dfracdoverline UdE+moverline Uright)+(akE^k-1+s)overline U=0$
$cdfracd^2overline UdE^2+(aE^k+2cm)dfracdoverline UdE+(amE^k+akE^k-1+cm^2+s)overline U=0$
Take $cm^2+s=0$ , i.e. $m=pm isqrtdfracsc$ , the ODE becomes
$cdfracd^2overline UdE^2+(aE^kpm2isqrtcs)dfracdoverline UdE+left(pm iasqrtdfracscE^k+akE^k-1right)overline U=0$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
For $cdfracd^2overlinevarphidE^2+aE^kdfracdoverlinevarphidE+(akE^k-1+s)overlinevarphi=0$ ,
Let $overlinevarphi=e^mEoverline U$ ,
Then $dfracdoverlinevarphidE=e^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEoverline U$
$dfracd^2overlinevarphidE^2=e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline U=e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+2me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline U$
$therefore cleft(e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+2me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline Uright)+aE^kleft(e^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEoverline Uright)+(akE^k-1+s)e^mEoverline U=0$
$cleft(dfracd^2overline UdE^2+2mdfracdoverline UdE+m^2overline Uright)+aE^kleft(dfracdoverline UdE+moverline Uright)+(akE^k-1+s)overline U=0$
$cdfracd^2overline UdE^2+(aE^k+2cm)dfracdoverline UdE+(amE^k+akE^k-1+cm^2+s)overline U=0$
Take $cm^2+s=0$ , i.e. $m=pm isqrtdfracsc$ , the ODE becomes
$cdfracd^2overline UdE^2+(aE^kpm2isqrtcs)dfracdoverline UdE+left(pm iasqrtdfracscE^k+akE^k-1right)overline U=0$
$endgroup$
Hint:
For $cdfracd^2overlinevarphidE^2+aE^kdfracdoverlinevarphidE+(akE^k-1+s)overlinevarphi=0$ ,
Let $overlinevarphi=e^mEoverline U$ ,
Then $dfracdoverlinevarphidE=e^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEoverline U$
$dfracd^2overlinevarphidE^2=e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline U=e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+2me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline U$
$therefore cleft(e^mEdfracd^2overline UdE^2+2me^mEdfracdoverline UdE+m^2e^mEoverline Uright)+aE^kleft(e^mEdfracdoverline UdE+me^mEoverline Uright)+(akE^k-1+s)e^mEoverline U=0$
$cleft(dfracd^2overline UdE^2+2mdfracdoverline UdE+m^2overline Uright)+aE^kleft(dfracdoverline UdE+moverline Uright)+(akE^k-1+s)overline U=0$
$cdfracd^2overline UdE^2+(aE^k+2cm)dfracdoverline UdE+(amE^k+akE^k-1+cm^2+s)overline U=0$
Take $cm^2+s=0$ , i.e. $m=pm isqrtdfracsc$ , the ODE becomes
$cdfracd^2overline UdE^2+(aE^kpm2isqrtcs)dfracdoverline UdE+left(pm iasqrtdfracscE^k+akE^k-1right)overline U=0$
answered Mar 29 at 6:23
doraemonpauldoraemonpaul
12.8k31761
12.8k31761
add a comment |
add a comment |
Tiberiu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tiberiu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tiberiu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tiberiu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165729%2fsolution-to-this-second-order-linear-differential-equation-with-variable-coeffic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown