How do scammers retract money, while you can’t? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowI believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin“Infinite Banking” or “Be Your Own Bank” via Whole Life Insurance…where to start?Is this reply promising a money order and cashier check a scam?How do scammers / money launderers profit from loans to victims?Is this a scam or not?Can I make my online transactions secure in the USA, when paying using bank account details or debit card details?Scammer sent money to my account. What should I do?How to withdraw large sum of money at onceHow safe is my money with BankA man wants to send me moneyhow does this scam work
Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis
Elegant way to replace substring in a regex with optional groups in Python?
Received an invoice from my ex-employer billing me for training; how to handle?
Giving the same color to different shapefiles in QGIS
Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?
Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
Between two walls
WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
"and that skill is always a class skill for you" - does "always" have any meaning in Pathfinder?
Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?
How to count occurrences of text in a file?
Which tube will fit a -(700 x 25c) wheel?
Do I need to enable Dev Hub in my PROD Org?
Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?
Interfacing a button to MCU (and PC) with 50m long cable
Workaholic Formal/Informal
Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?
If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?
multiple labels for a single equation
If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?
Disadvantage of gaining multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game
Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers
How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowI believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin“Infinite Banking” or “Be Your Own Bank” via Whole Life Insurance…where to start?Is this reply promising a money order and cashier check a scam?How do scammers / money launderers profit from loans to victims?Is this a scam or not?Can I make my online transactions secure in the USA, when paying using bank account details or debit card details?Scammer sent money to my account. What should I do?How to withdraw large sum of money at onceHow safe is my money with BankA man wants to send me moneyhow does this scam work
I see a lot of question about scams with the same premises :
someone put money in your account.
you send money somewhere.
they take their money back, while you lost your money.
I dont know a whole lot about banking and money transfers, but it seems odd to me that they can retract money back while you cant do that.
Can someone explain this?
banking scams
New contributor
darnok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I see a lot of question about scams with the same premises :
someone put money in your account.
you send money somewhere.
they take their money back, while you lost your money.
I dont know a whole lot about banking and money transfers, but it seems odd to me that they can retract money back while you cant do that.
Can someone explain this?
banking scams
New contributor
darnok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I see a lot of question about scams with the same premises :
someone put money in your account.
you send money somewhere.
they take their money back, while you lost your money.
I dont know a whole lot about banking and money transfers, but it seems odd to me that they can retract money back while you cant do that.
Can someone explain this?
banking scams
New contributor
darnok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I see a lot of question about scams with the same premises :
someone put money in your account.
you send money somewhere.
they take their money back, while you lost your money.
I dont know a whole lot about banking and money transfers, but it seems odd to me that they can retract money back while you cant do that.
Can someone explain this?
banking scams
banking scams
New contributor
darnok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
darnok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
Ben Miller
81.6k21224291
81.6k21224291
New contributor
darnok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
darnokdarnok
503125
503125
New contributor
darnok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
darnok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
darnok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
Here’s what happens:
When you thought the scammer deposited money in your account, it didn’t really happen. It was essentially fake money. This could happen in a few different ways. It could be that the scammer gave you a bad/fake check, which isn’t discovered until several days after you deposited it. Banks don’t know for sure if checks are good until they send it on to the issuing bank. As a courtesy, your bank will assume it is good as soon as you deposit it and credit your account immediately, but if the check turns out to be bad, they will withdraw that amount back from your account, and if you have already spent that money, the bank will want you to pay it back. There is also an electronic version of this scenario: If you are electronically sent money from an account by mistake or an account that was hacked, this can be reversed.
On the other side of the scam, when you send money out of your account to the scammer, you are doing so willingly, even if you were tricked into doing so. You went to the bank and withdrew the cash, or you wrote the check, or you initiated the electronic transfer out. Your account was not hijacked; you told the bank what you wanted to do with your account. You can’t normally just change your mind after the fact.
If the scammer took control of your account electronically and stole the money, or the scammer forged a check without your knowledge, you would generally be able to get your money back from the bank. But if you willingly hand money over to the scammer, you will need to go after the scammer to get your money back.
37
Isn't that courtesy from the bank a major security flaw? Surely in an era of high frequency trading it should not take more than some seconds to verify the originating account?
– gerrit
2 days ago
24
@gerrit It depends on how you look at it. Once upon a time, banks used to have waiting periods for checks: when you deposited a check, banks used to wait several days before crediting your account. It wasn’t a popular policy, and of course by doing that you lose out on interest you would have earned on your deposit over those days. I’ve had a bank account my whole life, and I’ve never deposited a bad check; I wouldn’t like it if my bank made me wait for my money.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
9
@gerrit Instead, it is up to you to determine if the check you have is suspect or not. If you have reason to believe the check might not be good, you can deposit it and wait a week or two before spending the money. That way, if the check turns out to be bad, there is no problem.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
6
They probably mean exactly what they said. @9ilsdx9rvj0lo Depositing money into someone else's bank account is something that anyone can do. You could go into my bank and tell them that you want to deposit money into my account. They do not care, because there is no reason to stop such a transaction; it doesn't hurt me. My mother actually did this once when she owed me money and we couldn't meet for a while, she just went to my bank and deposited into my account. My employer does it every week. In the scams, the scammer may have your bank number too which makes it easier for them.
– Aaron
2 days ago
9
@gerrit A bank real business is to manage risk. They are also a company that has to please customers else they take their money elsewhere. Balancing the pros of releasing the money immediately and making the client happy with the cons of maybe doing a withdraw to retrieve in the rare case it is a bad check, the bank decided that happy clients give the bank more money than it loses with frauds and angry clients that were charged back.
– Mindwin
2 days ago
|
show 34 more comments
Some payment methods people are able to cancel or the money doesn't fully exist until 'cleared', some not.
This scam works by sending you money via one that can such as a check, followed by you sending them money back via one that can't, typically Western Union, cash in person or via crypto etc.
They then cancel the money you got, leaving you out of pocket and with no way to cancel the money you gave away.
3
I would assume that, along these lines, that there is a limited time to cancel on cancelable payments. The scammer does so right away, where the mark is reacting which may be to late.
– Pete B.
2 days ago
1
I think this answer is wrong. It seems to be saying that the scammer is sending real checks from a real bank and then paying the bank for a "stop payment". This seems totally unnecessary and highly increase the chances of the scammer being arrested, when a counterfeit check would do the job cheaper and safer.
– DavidS
23 hours ago
@DavidS it's not a matter of whether one specific check is real or forged, but the fact that checks, in general, can be reversed, allowing this opportunity. It doesn't matter whether the check is fake, or a real check that you stop payment on, the effect is the same.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
add a comment |
How do scammers [do something...], while you can’t?
A major factor here is the willingness to commit a crime, particularly fraud. For example, you can reverse a credit card charge by calling the customer service number and complaining that a purchase was unauthorized or fraudulent. Normal people do not lie about this because there are real consequences.
In fact almost all bank based consumer electronic transfers can be reversed long after the fact in case of fraud. Some electronic transfers like Western Union or Bitcoin can NEVER be reversed. Withdrawing the money as cash is another non-reversible action. Paying money from a reversible transaction using a never reversible one is a common theme in scams.
Many fraud schemes are based on transactions where a bank will show money in a consumer's account before the bank actually receives the funds from the transfer. This is sort of a loan. Checks from another bank, for example, take several days to clear. If the check is fake, the other bank will not honor it and the consumer's bank will take back the money they loaned.
2
Well actually, with a controlling share of the Bitcoin network, you could cancel the transaction. But that would be prohibitively expensive.
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
2
Which is why some financial institutions will not wire to/from Western Union.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
add a comment |
Sometimes the scammer doesn't even need to intentionally cancel the original payment. They might send you a check, which you deposit in your account. Your bank accepts the check and it may even post to your account because the bank assumes that it is legitimate (and it does appear that way at first). A couple days/weeks later the bank finds out that the account tied to the check does not exist or doesn't have any money in it, and they reverse the deposit.
Other times, the scammer requires you (the scammee?) to send them payment via a non-reversible method, like Philip stated.
I would say that the scammer never needs to cancel the original payment, because the scammer never actually sent any real money.
– Hutch
23 hours ago
1
The term for "scammee" is mark.
– Volker Siegel
15 hours ago
@Hutch it doesn't matter. A scammer could send a real check and stop payment on it, and the effect would be the same. They're still a scammer, just a dumb one.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The only entity who can rewert done money transfer is the bank itself, and they will do it only if there was something very wrong with the transfer itself, for example transfer resulted from system failure or the money came from criminal activity (from the account, that was closed by the law enforcement).
However, if you send the money from your bank account that is not blacklisted and contains legitimate money, so there's no reason to cancel that transfer.
Well, if your account was used to wash money, it might be blacklisted then, but you'd loose your money anyway, and the money sent to another account was most likely taken out.
Notice that it's a money washing schema. Criminals can't revert done money transfer on their own, and they have no interest in having their accounts confiscated by the police, so reverting the transfer is only a side effect (and most likely, only the beginning of your transfer).
New contributor
9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
protected by JoeTaxpayer♦ 2 days ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here’s what happens:
When you thought the scammer deposited money in your account, it didn’t really happen. It was essentially fake money. This could happen in a few different ways. It could be that the scammer gave you a bad/fake check, which isn’t discovered until several days after you deposited it. Banks don’t know for sure if checks are good until they send it on to the issuing bank. As a courtesy, your bank will assume it is good as soon as you deposit it and credit your account immediately, but if the check turns out to be bad, they will withdraw that amount back from your account, and if you have already spent that money, the bank will want you to pay it back. There is also an electronic version of this scenario: If you are electronically sent money from an account by mistake or an account that was hacked, this can be reversed.
On the other side of the scam, when you send money out of your account to the scammer, you are doing so willingly, even if you were tricked into doing so. You went to the bank and withdrew the cash, or you wrote the check, or you initiated the electronic transfer out. Your account was not hijacked; you told the bank what you wanted to do with your account. You can’t normally just change your mind after the fact.
If the scammer took control of your account electronically and stole the money, or the scammer forged a check without your knowledge, you would generally be able to get your money back from the bank. But if you willingly hand money over to the scammer, you will need to go after the scammer to get your money back.
37
Isn't that courtesy from the bank a major security flaw? Surely in an era of high frequency trading it should not take more than some seconds to verify the originating account?
– gerrit
2 days ago
24
@gerrit It depends on how you look at it. Once upon a time, banks used to have waiting periods for checks: when you deposited a check, banks used to wait several days before crediting your account. It wasn’t a popular policy, and of course by doing that you lose out on interest you would have earned on your deposit over those days. I’ve had a bank account my whole life, and I’ve never deposited a bad check; I wouldn’t like it if my bank made me wait for my money.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
9
@gerrit Instead, it is up to you to determine if the check you have is suspect or not. If you have reason to believe the check might not be good, you can deposit it and wait a week or two before spending the money. That way, if the check turns out to be bad, there is no problem.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
6
They probably mean exactly what they said. @9ilsdx9rvj0lo Depositing money into someone else's bank account is something that anyone can do. You could go into my bank and tell them that you want to deposit money into my account. They do not care, because there is no reason to stop such a transaction; it doesn't hurt me. My mother actually did this once when she owed me money and we couldn't meet for a while, she just went to my bank and deposited into my account. My employer does it every week. In the scams, the scammer may have your bank number too which makes it easier for them.
– Aaron
2 days ago
9
@gerrit A bank real business is to manage risk. They are also a company that has to please customers else they take their money elsewhere. Balancing the pros of releasing the money immediately and making the client happy with the cons of maybe doing a withdraw to retrieve in the rare case it is a bad check, the bank decided that happy clients give the bank more money than it loses with frauds and angry clients that were charged back.
– Mindwin
2 days ago
|
show 34 more comments
Here’s what happens:
When you thought the scammer deposited money in your account, it didn’t really happen. It was essentially fake money. This could happen in a few different ways. It could be that the scammer gave you a bad/fake check, which isn’t discovered until several days after you deposited it. Banks don’t know for sure if checks are good until they send it on to the issuing bank. As a courtesy, your bank will assume it is good as soon as you deposit it and credit your account immediately, but if the check turns out to be bad, they will withdraw that amount back from your account, and if you have already spent that money, the bank will want you to pay it back. There is also an electronic version of this scenario: If you are electronically sent money from an account by mistake or an account that was hacked, this can be reversed.
On the other side of the scam, when you send money out of your account to the scammer, you are doing so willingly, even if you were tricked into doing so. You went to the bank and withdrew the cash, or you wrote the check, or you initiated the electronic transfer out. Your account was not hijacked; you told the bank what you wanted to do with your account. You can’t normally just change your mind after the fact.
If the scammer took control of your account electronically and stole the money, or the scammer forged a check without your knowledge, you would generally be able to get your money back from the bank. But if you willingly hand money over to the scammer, you will need to go after the scammer to get your money back.
37
Isn't that courtesy from the bank a major security flaw? Surely in an era of high frequency trading it should not take more than some seconds to verify the originating account?
– gerrit
2 days ago
24
@gerrit It depends on how you look at it. Once upon a time, banks used to have waiting periods for checks: when you deposited a check, banks used to wait several days before crediting your account. It wasn’t a popular policy, and of course by doing that you lose out on interest you would have earned on your deposit over those days. I’ve had a bank account my whole life, and I’ve never deposited a bad check; I wouldn’t like it if my bank made me wait for my money.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
9
@gerrit Instead, it is up to you to determine if the check you have is suspect or not. If you have reason to believe the check might not be good, you can deposit it and wait a week or two before spending the money. That way, if the check turns out to be bad, there is no problem.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
6
They probably mean exactly what they said. @9ilsdx9rvj0lo Depositing money into someone else's bank account is something that anyone can do. You could go into my bank and tell them that you want to deposit money into my account. They do not care, because there is no reason to stop such a transaction; it doesn't hurt me. My mother actually did this once when she owed me money and we couldn't meet for a while, she just went to my bank and deposited into my account. My employer does it every week. In the scams, the scammer may have your bank number too which makes it easier for them.
– Aaron
2 days ago
9
@gerrit A bank real business is to manage risk. They are also a company that has to please customers else they take their money elsewhere. Balancing the pros of releasing the money immediately and making the client happy with the cons of maybe doing a withdraw to retrieve in the rare case it is a bad check, the bank decided that happy clients give the bank more money than it loses with frauds and angry clients that were charged back.
– Mindwin
2 days ago
|
show 34 more comments
Here’s what happens:
When you thought the scammer deposited money in your account, it didn’t really happen. It was essentially fake money. This could happen in a few different ways. It could be that the scammer gave you a bad/fake check, which isn’t discovered until several days after you deposited it. Banks don’t know for sure if checks are good until they send it on to the issuing bank. As a courtesy, your bank will assume it is good as soon as you deposit it and credit your account immediately, but if the check turns out to be bad, they will withdraw that amount back from your account, and if you have already spent that money, the bank will want you to pay it back. There is also an electronic version of this scenario: If you are electronically sent money from an account by mistake or an account that was hacked, this can be reversed.
On the other side of the scam, when you send money out of your account to the scammer, you are doing so willingly, even if you were tricked into doing so. You went to the bank and withdrew the cash, or you wrote the check, or you initiated the electronic transfer out. Your account was not hijacked; you told the bank what you wanted to do with your account. You can’t normally just change your mind after the fact.
If the scammer took control of your account electronically and stole the money, or the scammer forged a check without your knowledge, you would generally be able to get your money back from the bank. But if you willingly hand money over to the scammer, you will need to go after the scammer to get your money back.
Here’s what happens:
When you thought the scammer deposited money in your account, it didn’t really happen. It was essentially fake money. This could happen in a few different ways. It could be that the scammer gave you a bad/fake check, which isn’t discovered until several days after you deposited it. Banks don’t know for sure if checks are good until they send it on to the issuing bank. As a courtesy, your bank will assume it is good as soon as you deposit it and credit your account immediately, but if the check turns out to be bad, they will withdraw that amount back from your account, and if you have already spent that money, the bank will want you to pay it back. There is also an electronic version of this scenario: If you are electronically sent money from an account by mistake or an account that was hacked, this can be reversed.
On the other side of the scam, when you send money out of your account to the scammer, you are doing so willingly, even if you were tricked into doing so. You went to the bank and withdrew the cash, or you wrote the check, or you initiated the electronic transfer out. Your account was not hijacked; you told the bank what you wanted to do with your account. You can’t normally just change your mind after the fact.
If the scammer took control of your account electronically and stole the money, or the scammer forged a check without your knowledge, you would generally be able to get your money back from the bank. But if you willingly hand money over to the scammer, you will need to go after the scammer to get your money back.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Ben MillerBen Miller
81.6k21224291
81.6k21224291
37
Isn't that courtesy from the bank a major security flaw? Surely in an era of high frequency trading it should not take more than some seconds to verify the originating account?
– gerrit
2 days ago
24
@gerrit It depends on how you look at it. Once upon a time, banks used to have waiting periods for checks: when you deposited a check, banks used to wait several days before crediting your account. It wasn’t a popular policy, and of course by doing that you lose out on interest you would have earned on your deposit over those days. I’ve had a bank account my whole life, and I’ve never deposited a bad check; I wouldn’t like it if my bank made me wait for my money.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
9
@gerrit Instead, it is up to you to determine if the check you have is suspect or not. If you have reason to believe the check might not be good, you can deposit it and wait a week or two before spending the money. That way, if the check turns out to be bad, there is no problem.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
6
They probably mean exactly what they said. @9ilsdx9rvj0lo Depositing money into someone else's bank account is something that anyone can do. You could go into my bank and tell them that you want to deposit money into my account. They do not care, because there is no reason to stop such a transaction; it doesn't hurt me. My mother actually did this once when she owed me money and we couldn't meet for a while, she just went to my bank and deposited into my account. My employer does it every week. In the scams, the scammer may have your bank number too which makes it easier for them.
– Aaron
2 days ago
9
@gerrit A bank real business is to manage risk. They are also a company that has to please customers else they take their money elsewhere. Balancing the pros of releasing the money immediately and making the client happy with the cons of maybe doing a withdraw to retrieve in the rare case it is a bad check, the bank decided that happy clients give the bank more money than it loses with frauds and angry clients that were charged back.
– Mindwin
2 days ago
|
show 34 more comments
37
Isn't that courtesy from the bank a major security flaw? Surely in an era of high frequency trading it should not take more than some seconds to verify the originating account?
– gerrit
2 days ago
24
@gerrit It depends on how you look at it. Once upon a time, banks used to have waiting periods for checks: when you deposited a check, banks used to wait several days before crediting your account. It wasn’t a popular policy, and of course by doing that you lose out on interest you would have earned on your deposit over those days. I’ve had a bank account my whole life, and I’ve never deposited a bad check; I wouldn’t like it if my bank made me wait for my money.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
9
@gerrit Instead, it is up to you to determine if the check you have is suspect or not. If you have reason to believe the check might not be good, you can deposit it and wait a week or two before spending the money. That way, if the check turns out to be bad, there is no problem.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
6
They probably mean exactly what they said. @9ilsdx9rvj0lo Depositing money into someone else's bank account is something that anyone can do. You could go into my bank and tell them that you want to deposit money into my account. They do not care, because there is no reason to stop such a transaction; it doesn't hurt me. My mother actually did this once when she owed me money and we couldn't meet for a while, she just went to my bank and deposited into my account. My employer does it every week. In the scams, the scammer may have your bank number too which makes it easier for them.
– Aaron
2 days ago
9
@gerrit A bank real business is to manage risk. They are also a company that has to please customers else they take their money elsewhere. Balancing the pros of releasing the money immediately and making the client happy with the cons of maybe doing a withdraw to retrieve in the rare case it is a bad check, the bank decided that happy clients give the bank more money than it loses with frauds and angry clients that were charged back.
– Mindwin
2 days ago
37
37
Isn't that courtesy from the bank a major security flaw? Surely in an era of high frequency trading it should not take more than some seconds to verify the originating account?
– gerrit
2 days ago
Isn't that courtesy from the bank a major security flaw? Surely in an era of high frequency trading it should not take more than some seconds to verify the originating account?
– gerrit
2 days ago
24
24
@gerrit It depends on how you look at it. Once upon a time, banks used to have waiting periods for checks: when you deposited a check, banks used to wait several days before crediting your account. It wasn’t a popular policy, and of course by doing that you lose out on interest you would have earned on your deposit over those days. I’ve had a bank account my whole life, and I’ve never deposited a bad check; I wouldn’t like it if my bank made me wait for my money.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
@gerrit It depends on how you look at it. Once upon a time, banks used to have waiting periods for checks: when you deposited a check, banks used to wait several days before crediting your account. It wasn’t a popular policy, and of course by doing that you lose out on interest you would have earned on your deposit over those days. I’ve had a bank account my whole life, and I’ve never deposited a bad check; I wouldn’t like it if my bank made me wait for my money.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
9
9
@gerrit Instead, it is up to you to determine if the check you have is suspect or not. If you have reason to believe the check might not be good, you can deposit it and wait a week or two before spending the money. That way, if the check turns out to be bad, there is no problem.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
@gerrit Instead, it is up to you to determine if the check you have is suspect or not. If you have reason to believe the check might not be good, you can deposit it and wait a week or two before spending the money. That way, if the check turns out to be bad, there is no problem.
– Ben Miller
2 days ago
6
6
They probably mean exactly what they said. @9ilsdx9rvj0lo Depositing money into someone else's bank account is something that anyone can do. You could go into my bank and tell them that you want to deposit money into my account. They do not care, because there is no reason to stop such a transaction; it doesn't hurt me. My mother actually did this once when she owed me money and we couldn't meet for a while, she just went to my bank and deposited into my account. My employer does it every week. In the scams, the scammer may have your bank number too which makes it easier for them.
– Aaron
2 days ago
They probably mean exactly what they said. @9ilsdx9rvj0lo Depositing money into someone else's bank account is something that anyone can do. You could go into my bank and tell them that you want to deposit money into my account. They do not care, because there is no reason to stop such a transaction; it doesn't hurt me. My mother actually did this once when she owed me money and we couldn't meet for a while, she just went to my bank and deposited into my account. My employer does it every week. In the scams, the scammer may have your bank number too which makes it easier for them.
– Aaron
2 days ago
9
9
@gerrit A bank real business is to manage risk. They are also a company that has to please customers else they take their money elsewhere. Balancing the pros of releasing the money immediately and making the client happy with the cons of maybe doing a withdraw to retrieve in the rare case it is a bad check, the bank decided that happy clients give the bank more money than it loses with frauds and angry clients that were charged back.
– Mindwin
2 days ago
@gerrit A bank real business is to manage risk. They are also a company that has to please customers else they take their money elsewhere. Balancing the pros of releasing the money immediately and making the client happy with the cons of maybe doing a withdraw to retrieve in the rare case it is a bad check, the bank decided that happy clients give the bank more money than it loses with frauds and angry clients that were charged back.
– Mindwin
2 days ago
|
show 34 more comments
Some payment methods people are able to cancel or the money doesn't fully exist until 'cleared', some not.
This scam works by sending you money via one that can such as a check, followed by you sending them money back via one that can't, typically Western Union, cash in person or via crypto etc.
They then cancel the money you got, leaving you out of pocket and with no way to cancel the money you gave away.
3
I would assume that, along these lines, that there is a limited time to cancel on cancelable payments. The scammer does so right away, where the mark is reacting which may be to late.
– Pete B.
2 days ago
1
I think this answer is wrong. It seems to be saying that the scammer is sending real checks from a real bank and then paying the bank for a "stop payment". This seems totally unnecessary and highly increase the chances of the scammer being arrested, when a counterfeit check would do the job cheaper and safer.
– DavidS
23 hours ago
@DavidS it's not a matter of whether one specific check is real or forged, but the fact that checks, in general, can be reversed, allowing this opportunity. It doesn't matter whether the check is fake, or a real check that you stop payment on, the effect is the same.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Some payment methods people are able to cancel or the money doesn't fully exist until 'cleared', some not.
This scam works by sending you money via one that can such as a check, followed by you sending them money back via one that can't, typically Western Union, cash in person or via crypto etc.
They then cancel the money you got, leaving you out of pocket and with no way to cancel the money you gave away.
3
I would assume that, along these lines, that there is a limited time to cancel on cancelable payments. The scammer does so right away, where the mark is reacting which may be to late.
– Pete B.
2 days ago
1
I think this answer is wrong. It seems to be saying that the scammer is sending real checks from a real bank and then paying the bank for a "stop payment". This seems totally unnecessary and highly increase the chances of the scammer being arrested, when a counterfeit check would do the job cheaper and safer.
– DavidS
23 hours ago
@DavidS it's not a matter of whether one specific check is real or forged, but the fact that checks, in general, can be reversed, allowing this opportunity. It doesn't matter whether the check is fake, or a real check that you stop payment on, the effect is the same.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Some payment methods people are able to cancel or the money doesn't fully exist until 'cleared', some not.
This scam works by sending you money via one that can such as a check, followed by you sending them money back via one that can't, typically Western Union, cash in person or via crypto etc.
They then cancel the money you got, leaving you out of pocket and with no way to cancel the money you gave away.
Some payment methods people are able to cancel or the money doesn't fully exist until 'cleared', some not.
This scam works by sending you money via one that can such as a check, followed by you sending them money back via one that can't, typically Western Union, cash in person or via crypto etc.
They then cancel the money you got, leaving you out of pocket and with no way to cancel the money you gave away.
edited 13 hours ago
answered 2 days ago
PhilipPhilip
2,528614
2,528614
3
I would assume that, along these lines, that there is a limited time to cancel on cancelable payments. The scammer does so right away, where the mark is reacting which may be to late.
– Pete B.
2 days ago
1
I think this answer is wrong. It seems to be saying that the scammer is sending real checks from a real bank and then paying the bank for a "stop payment". This seems totally unnecessary and highly increase the chances of the scammer being arrested, when a counterfeit check would do the job cheaper and safer.
– DavidS
23 hours ago
@DavidS it's not a matter of whether one specific check is real or forged, but the fact that checks, in general, can be reversed, allowing this opportunity. It doesn't matter whether the check is fake, or a real check that you stop payment on, the effect is the same.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3
I would assume that, along these lines, that there is a limited time to cancel on cancelable payments. The scammer does so right away, where the mark is reacting which may be to late.
– Pete B.
2 days ago
1
I think this answer is wrong. It seems to be saying that the scammer is sending real checks from a real bank and then paying the bank for a "stop payment". This seems totally unnecessary and highly increase the chances of the scammer being arrested, when a counterfeit check would do the job cheaper and safer.
– DavidS
23 hours ago
@DavidS it's not a matter of whether one specific check is real or forged, but the fact that checks, in general, can be reversed, allowing this opportunity. It doesn't matter whether the check is fake, or a real check that you stop payment on, the effect is the same.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
3
3
I would assume that, along these lines, that there is a limited time to cancel on cancelable payments. The scammer does so right away, where the mark is reacting which may be to late.
– Pete B.
2 days ago
I would assume that, along these lines, that there is a limited time to cancel on cancelable payments. The scammer does so right away, where the mark is reacting which may be to late.
– Pete B.
2 days ago
1
1
I think this answer is wrong. It seems to be saying that the scammer is sending real checks from a real bank and then paying the bank for a "stop payment". This seems totally unnecessary and highly increase the chances of the scammer being arrested, when a counterfeit check would do the job cheaper and safer.
– DavidS
23 hours ago
I think this answer is wrong. It seems to be saying that the scammer is sending real checks from a real bank and then paying the bank for a "stop payment". This seems totally unnecessary and highly increase the chances of the scammer being arrested, when a counterfeit check would do the job cheaper and safer.
– DavidS
23 hours ago
@DavidS it's not a matter of whether one specific check is real or forged, but the fact that checks, in general, can be reversed, allowing this opportunity. It doesn't matter whether the check is fake, or a real check that you stop payment on, the effect is the same.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
@DavidS it's not a matter of whether one specific check is real or forged, but the fact that checks, in general, can be reversed, allowing this opportunity. It doesn't matter whether the check is fake, or a real check that you stop payment on, the effect is the same.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
add a comment |
How do scammers [do something...], while you can’t?
A major factor here is the willingness to commit a crime, particularly fraud. For example, you can reverse a credit card charge by calling the customer service number and complaining that a purchase was unauthorized or fraudulent. Normal people do not lie about this because there are real consequences.
In fact almost all bank based consumer electronic transfers can be reversed long after the fact in case of fraud. Some electronic transfers like Western Union or Bitcoin can NEVER be reversed. Withdrawing the money as cash is another non-reversible action. Paying money from a reversible transaction using a never reversible one is a common theme in scams.
Many fraud schemes are based on transactions where a bank will show money in a consumer's account before the bank actually receives the funds from the transfer. This is sort of a loan. Checks from another bank, for example, take several days to clear. If the check is fake, the other bank will not honor it and the consumer's bank will take back the money they loaned.
2
Well actually, with a controlling share of the Bitcoin network, you could cancel the transaction. But that would be prohibitively expensive.
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
2
Which is why some financial institutions will not wire to/from Western Union.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
add a comment |
How do scammers [do something...], while you can’t?
A major factor here is the willingness to commit a crime, particularly fraud. For example, you can reverse a credit card charge by calling the customer service number and complaining that a purchase was unauthorized or fraudulent. Normal people do not lie about this because there are real consequences.
In fact almost all bank based consumer electronic transfers can be reversed long after the fact in case of fraud. Some electronic transfers like Western Union or Bitcoin can NEVER be reversed. Withdrawing the money as cash is another non-reversible action. Paying money from a reversible transaction using a never reversible one is a common theme in scams.
Many fraud schemes are based on transactions where a bank will show money in a consumer's account before the bank actually receives the funds from the transfer. This is sort of a loan. Checks from another bank, for example, take several days to clear. If the check is fake, the other bank will not honor it and the consumer's bank will take back the money they loaned.
2
Well actually, with a controlling share of the Bitcoin network, you could cancel the transaction. But that would be prohibitively expensive.
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
2
Which is why some financial institutions will not wire to/from Western Union.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
add a comment |
How do scammers [do something...], while you can’t?
A major factor here is the willingness to commit a crime, particularly fraud. For example, you can reverse a credit card charge by calling the customer service number and complaining that a purchase was unauthorized or fraudulent. Normal people do not lie about this because there are real consequences.
In fact almost all bank based consumer electronic transfers can be reversed long after the fact in case of fraud. Some electronic transfers like Western Union or Bitcoin can NEVER be reversed. Withdrawing the money as cash is another non-reversible action. Paying money from a reversible transaction using a never reversible one is a common theme in scams.
Many fraud schemes are based on transactions where a bank will show money in a consumer's account before the bank actually receives the funds from the transfer. This is sort of a loan. Checks from another bank, for example, take several days to clear. If the check is fake, the other bank will not honor it and the consumer's bank will take back the money they loaned.
How do scammers [do something...], while you can’t?
A major factor here is the willingness to commit a crime, particularly fraud. For example, you can reverse a credit card charge by calling the customer service number and complaining that a purchase was unauthorized or fraudulent. Normal people do not lie about this because there are real consequences.
In fact almost all bank based consumer electronic transfers can be reversed long after the fact in case of fraud. Some electronic transfers like Western Union or Bitcoin can NEVER be reversed. Withdrawing the money as cash is another non-reversible action. Paying money from a reversible transaction using a never reversible one is a common theme in scams.
Many fraud schemes are based on transactions where a bank will show money in a consumer's account before the bank actually receives the funds from the transfer. This is sort of a loan. Checks from another bank, for example, take several days to clear. If the check is fake, the other bank will not honor it and the consumer's bank will take back the money they loaned.
answered yesterday
trognanderstrognanders
66347
66347
2
Well actually, with a controlling share of the Bitcoin network, you could cancel the transaction. But that would be prohibitively expensive.
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
2
Which is why some financial institutions will not wire to/from Western Union.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
add a comment |
2
Well actually, with a controlling share of the Bitcoin network, you could cancel the transaction. But that would be prohibitively expensive.
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
2
Which is why some financial institutions will not wire to/from Western Union.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
2
2
Well actually, with a controlling share of the Bitcoin network, you could cancel the transaction. But that would be prohibitively expensive.
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
Well actually, with a controlling share of the Bitcoin network, you could cancel the transaction. But that would be prohibitively expensive.
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
2
2
Which is why some financial institutions will not wire to/from Western Union.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
Which is why some financial institutions will not wire to/from Western Union.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
add a comment |
Sometimes the scammer doesn't even need to intentionally cancel the original payment. They might send you a check, which you deposit in your account. Your bank accepts the check and it may even post to your account because the bank assumes that it is legitimate (and it does appear that way at first). A couple days/weeks later the bank finds out that the account tied to the check does not exist or doesn't have any money in it, and they reverse the deposit.
Other times, the scammer requires you (the scammee?) to send them payment via a non-reversible method, like Philip stated.
I would say that the scammer never needs to cancel the original payment, because the scammer never actually sent any real money.
– Hutch
23 hours ago
1
The term for "scammee" is mark.
– Volker Siegel
15 hours ago
@Hutch it doesn't matter. A scammer could send a real check and stop payment on it, and the effect would be the same. They're still a scammer, just a dumb one.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Sometimes the scammer doesn't even need to intentionally cancel the original payment. They might send you a check, which you deposit in your account. Your bank accepts the check and it may even post to your account because the bank assumes that it is legitimate (and it does appear that way at first). A couple days/weeks later the bank finds out that the account tied to the check does not exist or doesn't have any money in it, and they reverse the deposit.
Other times, the scammer requires you (the scammee?) to send them payment via a non-reversible method, like Philip stated.
I would say that the scammer never needs to cancel the original payment, because the scammer never actually sent any real money.
– Hutch
23 hours ago
1
The term for "scammee" is mark.
– Volker Siegel
15 hours ago
@Hutch it doesn't matter. A scammer could send a real check and stop payment on it, and the effect would be the same. They're still a scammer, just a dumb one.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Sometimes the scammer doesn't even need to intentionally cancel the original payment. They might send you a check, which you deposit in your account. Your bank accepts the check and it may even post to your account because the bank assumes that it is legitimate (and it does appear that way at first). A couple days/weeks later the bank finds out that the account tied to the check does not exist or doesn't have any money in it, and they reverse the deposit.
Other times, the scammer requires you (the scammee?) to send them payment via a non-reversible method, like Philip stated.
Sometimes the scammer doesn't even need to intentionally cancel the original payment. They might send you a check, which you deposit in your account. Your bank accepts the check and it may even post to your account because the bank assumes that it is legitimate (and it does appear that way at first). A couple days/weeks later the bank finds out that the account tied to the check does not exist or doesn't have any money in it, and they reverse the deposit.
Other times, the scammer requires you (the scammee?) to send them payment via a non-reversible method, like Philip stated.
edited 2 days ago
yoozer8
2,20341123
2,20341123
answered 2 days ago
NosjackNosjack
73517
73517
I would say that the scammer never needs to cancel the original payment, because the scammer never actually sent any real money.
– Hutch
23 hours ago
1
The term for "scammee" is mark.
– Volker Siegel
15 hours ago
@Hutch it doesn't matter. A scammer could send a real check and stop payment on it, and the effect would be the same. They're still a scammer, just a dumb one.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I would say that the scammer never needs to cancel the original payment, because the scammer never actually sent any real money.
– Hutch
23 hours ago
1
The term for "scammee" is mark.
– Volker Siegel
15 hours ago
@Hutch it doesn't matter. A scammer could send a real check and stop payment on it, and the effect would be the same. They're still a scammer, just a dumb one.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
I would say that the scammer never needs to cancel the original payment, because the scammer never actually sent any real money.
– Hutch
23 hours ago
I would say that the scammer never needs to cancel the original payment, because the scammer never actually sent any real money.
– Hutch
23 hours ago
1
1
The term for "scammee" is mark.
– Volker Siegel
15 hours ago
The term for "scammee" is mark.
– Volker Siegel
15 hours ago
@Hutch it doesn't matter. A scammer could send a real check and stop payment on it, and the effect would be the same. They're still a scammer, just a dumb one.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
@Hutch it doesn't matter. A scammer could send a real check and stop payment on it, and the effect would be the same. They're still a scammer, just a dumb one.
– barbecue
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The only entity who can rewert done money transfer is the bank itself, and they will do it only if there was something very wrong with the transfer itself, for example transfer resulted from system failure or the money came from criminal activity (from the account, that was closed by the law enforcement).
However, if you send the money from your bank account that is not blacklisted and contains legitimate money, so there's no reason to cancel that transfer.
Well, if your account was used to wash money, it might be blacklisted then, but you'd loose your money anyway, and the money sent to another account was most likely taken out.
Notice that it's a money washing schema. Criminals can't revert done money transfer on their own, and they have no interest in having their accounts confiscated by the police, so reverting the transfer is only a side effect (and most likely, only the beginning of your transfer).
New contributor
9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The only entity who can rewert done money transfer is the bank itself, and they will do it only if there was something very wrong with the transfer itself, for example transfer resulted from system failure or the money came from criminal activity (from the account, that was closed by the law enforcement).
However, if you send the money from your bank account that is not blacklisted and contains legitimate money, so there's no reason to cancel that transfer.
Well, if your account was used to wash money, it might be blacklisted then, but you'd loose your money anyway, and the money sent to another account was most likely taken out.
Notice that it's a money washing schema. Criminals can't revert done money transfer on their own, and they have no interest in having their accounts confiscated by the police, so reverting the transfer is only a side effect (and most likely, only the beginning of your transfer).
New contributor
9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The only entity who can rewert done money transfer is the bank itself, and they will do it only if there was something very wrong with the transfer itself, for example transfer resulted from system failure or the money came from criminal activity (from the account, that was closed by the law enforcement).
However, if you send the money from your bank account that is not blacklisted and contains legitimate money, so there's no reason to cancel that transfer.
Well, if your account was used to wash money, it might be blacklisted then, but you'd loose your money anyway, and the money sent to another account was most likely taken out.
Notice that it's a money washing schema. Criminals can't revert done money transfer on their own, and they have no interest in having their accounts confiscated by the police, so reverting the transfer is only a side effect (and most likely, only the beginning of your transfer).
New contributor
9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The only entity who can rewert done money transfer is the bank itself, and they will do it only if there was something very wrong with the transfer itself, for example transfer resulted from system failure or the money came from criminal activity (from the account, that was closed by the law enforcement).
However, if you send the money from your bank account that is not blacklisted and contains legitimate money, so there's no reason to cancel that transfer.
Well, if your account was used to wash money, it might be blacklisted then, but you'd loose your money anyway, and the money sent to another account was most likely taken out.
Notice that it's a money washing schema. Criminals can't revert done money transfer on their own, and they have no interest in having their accounts confiscated by the police, so reverting the transfer is only a side effect (and most likely, only the beginning of your transfer).
New contributor
9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 days ago
9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo
1211
1211
New contributor
9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by JoeTaxpayer♦ 2 days ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?