Solution for a functional equation The Next CEO of Stack OverflowIs it possible to have $f(x)f(y) = g(x)+g(y)$?Uniqueness of solution of functional equationUniqueness of solution for a functional equationWhat's the solution of the functional equation?What's the solution of the functional equationSolution of functional equationFunctional equation extended solutionUnderstanding of solution for a functional equation.Solution of particular functional equationExistence of solution for a functional equationfunctional equation in renormalization group theory
What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?
Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?
What is the result of assigning to std::vector<T>::begin()?
Can you replace a racial trait cantrip when leveling up?
Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?
How do we know the LHC results are robust?
Written every which way
What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?
Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?
What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?
Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"
Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)
To not tell, not take, and not want
What does convergence in distribution "in the Gromov–Hausdorff" sense mean?
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
How powerful is the invisibility granted by the Gloom Stalker ranger's Umbral Sight feature?
Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords
Received an invoice from my ex-employer billing me for training; how to handle?
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
Why does the UK parliament need a vote on the political declaration?
Novel about a guy who is possessed by the divine essence and the world ends?
How to count occurrences of text in a file?
Solution for a functional equation
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowIs it possible to have $f(x)f(y) = g(x)+g(y)$?Uniqueness of solution of functional equationUniqueness of solution for a functional equationWhat's the solution of the functional equation?What's the solution of the functional equationSolution of functional equationFunctional equation extended solutionUnderstanding of solution for a functional equation.Solution of particular functional equationExistence of solution for a functional equationfunctional equation in renormalization group theory
$begingroup$
I'm searching for a solution to the following functional equation:
$$f(u)f(u+lambda)=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i)rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i)rho(u_i-u-lambda)$$
where $f$ is the unknown function, $rho(u)=sin(u-lambda)/sin(lambda)$, $lambda=pi/4$ and there are $L$ arbitrary real parameters $u_i_i=1^L$ where $L$ is an even number.
This equation comes from a $TQ$-equation for a solvable lattice model. If necessary, I can give more information but the equation itself is independent from its physical origin. I hope someone can help.
analysis functional-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm searching for a solution to the following functional equation:
$$f(u)f(u+lambda)=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i)rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i)rho(u_i-u-lambda)$$
where $f$ is the unknown function, $rho(u)=sin(u-lambda)/sin(lambda)$, $lambda=pi/4$ and there are $L$ arbitrary real parameters $u_i_i=1^L$ where $L$ is an even number.
This equation comes from a $TQ$-equation for a solvable lattice model. If necessary, I can give more information but the equation itself is independent from its physical origin. I hope someone can help.
analysis functional-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm searching for a solution to the following functional equation:
$$f(u)f(u+lambda)=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i)rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i)rho(u_i-u-lambda)$$
where $f$ is the unknown function, $rho(u)=sin(u-lambda)/sin(lambda)$, $lambda=pi/4$ and there are $L$ arbitrary real parameters $u_i_i=1^L$ where $L$ is an even number.
This equation comes from a $TQ$-equation for a solvable lattice model. If necessary, I can give more information but the equation itself is independent from its physical origin. I hope someone can help.
analysis functional-equations
$endgroup$
I'm searching for a solution to the following functional equation:
$$f(u)f(u+lambda)=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i)rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i)rho(u_i-u-lambda)$$
where $f$ is the unknown function, $rho(u)=sin(u-lambda)/sin(lambda)$, $lambda=pi/4$ and there are $L$ arbitrary real parameters $u_i_i=1^L$ where $L$ is an even number.
This equation comes from a $TQ$-equation for a solvable lattice model. If necessary, I can give more information but the equation itself is independent from its physical origin. I hope someone can help.
analysis functional-equations
analysis functional-equations
asked 2 days ago
TheoPhysicaeTheoPhysicae
355
355
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is not a complete solution, but just presenting a few ideas.
Let's work on $rho$ first:
beginalign*
rho(u)&=fracsin(u-lambda)sin(lambda)\
&=fracsin(u)cos(lambda)-cos(u)sin(lambda)sin(lambda)\
&=sin(u)-cos(u),
endalign*
since $lambda=pi/4$ and $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4).$
Next, we look at what happens when we have $rho(u)cdotrho(-u).$ We have
beginalign*
rho(u)cdotrho(-u)&=[sin(u)-cos(u)][-sin(u)-cos(u)] \
&=-sin^2(u)-sin(u)cos(u)+sin(u)cos(u)+cos^2(u)\
&=cos^2(u)-sin^2(u)\
&=cos(2u).
endalign*
From this, we gather that
beginalign*f(u),f(u+lambda)&=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i),rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i),rho(u_i-u-lambda)\
&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u-lambda)) \
&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u)-pi/2),;textor \
f(u),f(u+pi/4)&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u)).
endalign*
From this, we can at least see that if $u=u_i$ for any $1le ile L,$ then the second product drops out and you get
$$f(u_i),f(u_i+pi/4)=prod_beginarraycj=1\ jnot=iendarray^Lcos(2(u_j-u)).$$
Conversely, if $u_i-u=(2k+1)pi/4$ for some $kinmathbbZ,$ then the first product series drops out and you only get the second one.
Finally, it's always worthwhile plugging in $u=0$ to arrive at
$$f(0),f(pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2u_i)+prod_i=1^Lsin(2u_i).$$
The RHS of
$$f(u),f(u+pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u))$$
is $pi$ periodic, and hence the LHS is as well.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
$endgroup$
– TheoPhysicae
yesterday
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
$begingroup$
Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164706%2fsolution-for-a-functional-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is not a complete solution, but just presenting a few ideas.
Let's work on $rho$ first:
beginalign*
rho(u)&=fracsin(u-lambda)sin(lambda)\
&=fracsin(u)cos(lambda)-cos(u)sin(lambda)sin(lambda)\
&=sin(u)-cos(u),
endalign*
since $lambda=pi/4$ and $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4).$
Next, we look at what happens when we have $rho(u)cdotrho(-u).$ We have
beginalign*
rho(u)cdotrho(-u)&=[sin(u)-cos(u)][-sin(u)-cos(u)] \
&=-sin^2(u)-sin(u)cos(u)+sin(u)cos(u)+cos^2(u)\
&=cos^2(u)-sin^2(u)\
&=cos(2u).
endalign*
From this, we gather that
beginalign*f(u),f(u+lambda)&=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i),rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i),rho(u_i-u-lambda)\
&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u-lambda)) \
&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u)-pi/2),;textor \
f(u),f(u+pi/4)&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u)).
endalign*
From this, we can at least see that if $u=u_i$ for any $1le ile L,$ then the second product drops out and you get
$$f(u_i),f(u_i+pi/4)=prod_beginarraycj=1\ jnot=iendarray^Lcos(2(u_j-u)).$$
Conversely, if $u_i-u=(2k+1)pi/4$ for some $kinmathbbZ,$ then the first product series drops out and you only get the second one.
Finally, it's always worthwhile plugging in $u=0$ to arrive at
$$f(0),f(pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2u_i)+prod_i=1^Lsin(2u_i).$$
The RHS of
$$f(u),f(u+pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u))$$
is $pi$ periodic, and hence the LHS is as well.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
$endgroup$
– TheoPhysicae
yesterday
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
$begingroup$
Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is not a complete solution, but just presenting a few ideas.
Let's work on $rho$ first:
beginalign*
rho(u)&=fracsin(u-lambda)sin(lambda)\
&=fracsin(u)cos(lambda)-cos(u)sin(lambda)sin(lambda)\
&=sin(u)-cos(u),
endalign*
since $lambda=pi/4$ and $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4).$
Next, we look at what happens when we have $rho(u)cdotrho(-u).$ We have
beginalign*
rho(u)cdotrho(-u)&=[sin(u)-cos(u)][-sin(u)-cos(u)] \
&=-sin^2(u)-sin(u)cos(u)+sin(u)cos(u)+cos^2(u)\
&=cos^2(u)-sin^2(u)\
&=cos(2u).
endalign*
From this, we gather that
beginalign*f(u),f(u+lambda)&=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i),rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i),rho(u_i-u-lambda)\
&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u-lambda)) \
&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u)-pi/2),;textor \
f(u),f(u+pi/4)&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u)).
endalign*
From this, we can at least see that if $u=u_i$ for any $1le ile L,$ then the second product drops out and you get
$$f(u_i),f(u_i+pi/4)=prod_beginarraycj=1\ jnot=iendarray^Lcos(2(u_j-u)).$$
Conversely, if $u_i-u=(2k+1)pi/4$ for some $kinmathbbZ,$ then the first product series drops out and you only get the second one.
Finally, it's always worthwhile plugging in $u=0$ to arrive at
$$f(0),f(pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2u_i)+prod_i=1^Lsin(2u_i).$$
The RHS of
$$f(u),f(u+pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u))$$
is $pi$ periodic, and hence the LHS is as well.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
$endgroup$
– TheoPhysicae
yesterday
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
$begingroup$
Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is not a complete solution, but just presenting a few ideas.
Let's work on $rho$ first:
beginalign*
rho(u)&=fracsin(u-lambda)sin(lambda)\
&=fracsin(u)cos(lambda)-cos(u)sin(lambda)sin(lambda)\
&=sin(u)-cos(u),
endalign*
since $lambda=pi/4$ and $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4).$
Next, we look at what happens when we have $rho(u)cdotrho(-u).$ We have
beginalign*
rho(u)cdotrho(-u)&=[sin(u)-cos(u)][-sin(u)-cos(u)] \
&=-sin^2(u)-sin(u)cos(u)+sin(u)cos(u)+cos^2(u)\
&=cos^2(u)-sin^2(u)\
&=cos(2u).
endalign*
From this, we gather that
beginalign*f(u),f(u+lambda)&=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i),rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i),rho(u_i-u-lambda)\
&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u-lambda)) \
&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u)-pi/2),;textor \
f(u),f(u+pi/4)&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u)).
endalign*
From this, we can at least see that if $u=u_i$ for any $1le ile L,$ then the second product drops out and you get
$$f(u_i),f(u_i+pi/4)=prod_beginarraycj=1\ jnot=iendarray^Lcos(2(u_j-u)).$$
Conversely, if $u_i-u=(2k+1)pi/4$ for some $kinmathbbZ,$ then the first product series drops out and you only get the second one.
Finally, it's always worthwhile plugging in $u=0$ to arrive at
$$f(0),f(pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2u_i)+prod_i=1^Lsin(2u_i).$$
The RHS of
$$f(u),f(u+pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u))$$
is $pi$ periodic, and hence the LHS is as well.
$endgroup$
This is not a complete solution, but just presenting a few ideas.
Let's work on $rho$ first:
beginalign*
rho(u)&=fracsin(u-lambda)sin(lambda)\
&=fracsin(u)cos(lambda)-cos(u)sin(lambda)sin(lambda)\
&=sin(u)-cos(u),
endalign*
since $lambda=pi/4$ and $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4).$
Next, we look at what happens when we have $rho(u)cdotrho(-u).$ We have
beginalign*
rho(u)cdotrho(-u)&=[sin(u)-cos(u)][-sin(u)-cos(u)] \
&=-sin^2(u)-sin(u)cos(u)+sin(u)cos(u)+cos^2(u)\
&=cos^2(u)-sin^2(u)\
&=cos(2u).
endalign*
From this, we gather that
beginalign*f(u),f(u+lambda)&=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i),rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i),rho(u_i-u-lambda)\
&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u-lambda)) \
&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u)-pi/2),;textor \
f(u),f(u+pi/4)&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u)).
endalign*
From this, we can at least see that if $u=u_i$ for any $1le ile L,$ then the second product drops out and you get
$$f(u_i),f(u_i+pi/4)=prod_beginarraycj=1\ jnot=iendarray^Lcos(2(u_j-u)).$$
Conversely, if $u_i-u=(2k+1)pi/4$ for some $kinmathbbZ,$ then the first product series drops out and you only get the second one.
Finally, it's always worthwhile plugging in $u=0$ to arrive at
$$f(0),f(pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2u_i)+prod_i=1^Lsin(2u_i).$$
The RHS of
$$f(u),f(u+pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u))$$
is $pi$ periodic, and hence the LHS is as well.
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Adrian KeisterAdrian Keister
5,28171933
5,28171933
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
$endgroup$
– TheoPhysicae
yesterday
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
$begingroup$
Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
$endgroup$
– TheoPhysicae
yesterday
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
$begingroup$
Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
$endgroup$
– TheoPhysicae
yesterday
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
$endgroup$
– TheoPhysicae
yesterday
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
$begingroup$
Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
$begingroup$
Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164706%2fsolution-for-a-functional-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown