Curve is a Noetherian Topological Space The Next CEO of Stack OverflowSeparated and Finite Type Scheme over an Algebraically Closed FieldWhy is the disjoint union of a finite number of affine schemes an affine scheme?Why is every Noetherian zero-dimensional scheme finite discrete?Can we prove that a quasi-compact locally noetherian space is noetherian without Axiom of Choice?Does pullback of schemes by monomorphism produce topological pullback?Is a product of two Noetherian schemes over Spec $mathbb Z$ a Noetherian scheme?AG on non-Noetherian ringsFinite Morphism of Schemes is ProperGalois Action on underlying Topological space of a Group SchemeProper Non Constant Morphism of Curves has Finite Fibers
Received an invoice from my ex-employer billing me for training; how to handle?
Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords
How do we know the LHC results are robust?
Several mode to write the symbol of a vector
Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?
Preparing Indesign booklet with .psd graphics for print
SQL Server 2016 - excessive memory grant warning on poor performing query
Are there any unintended negative consequences to allowing PCs to gain multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game?
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?
calculus parametric curve length
Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?
How to make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?
How to count occurrences of text in a file?
Is it ever safe to open a suspicious html file (e.g. email attachment)?
Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase "We went to the movies last night."?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Do I need to enable Dev Hub in my PROD Org?
If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?
WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?
Why do remote companies require working in the US?
If a black hole is created from light, can this black hole then move at speed of light?
What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?
How to transpose the 1st and -1th levels of arbitrarily nested array?
Curve is a Noetherian Topological Space
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowSeparated and Finite Type Scheme over an Algebraically Closed FieldWhy is the disjoint union of a finite number of affine schemes an affine scheme?Why is every Noetherian zero-dimensional scheme finite discrete?Can we prove that a quasi-compact locally noetherian space is noetherian without Axiom of Choice?Does pullback of schemes by monomorphism produce topological pullback?Is a product of two Noetherian schemes over Spec $mathbb Z$ a Noetherian scheme?AG on non-Noetherian ringsFinite Morphism of Schemes is ProperGalois Action on underlying Topological space of a Group SchemeProper Non Constant Morphism of Curves has Finite Fibers
$begingroup$
Let $C$ be curve, so a $1$-dimensional, separated $k$-scheme of finite type).
My question is how to see that the underlying topological space of $C$ is a Noetherian space, so satisfies the descending chain condition for closed subsets.
My attempts:
Obviously $C$ is locally noetherian:
Because $C$ is $k$-scheme of finite type so we can find for each $c∈C$ a wlog affine open neighborhood $U_c=Spec(R)$ of $c$ such that $R=k[x_1,...,x_n]/I$ and by Hilbert $R$ is noetherian therefore $U_c$ is noetherian (especially as topological space). The proplem is that the argument $R$ noetherian $⇔ Spec(R)$ noetherian works only for affine schemes.
Generally $C$ is not affine so I hornestly don't know how to show that $C$ is a noetherian space in satisfying way. One way to see it is would be to embedd it in a $mathbbP^n$. But I find it a bit overkill like so would like to prefer a more elementary argument basing on the definition of a curve as given above.
algebraic-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $C$ be curve, so a $1$-dimensional, separated $k$-scheme of finite type).
My question is how to see that the underlying topological space of $C$ is a Noetherian space, so satisfies the descending chain condition for closed subsets.
My attempts:
Obviously $C$ is locally noetherian:
Because $C$ is $k$-scheme of finite type so we can find for each $c∈C$ a wlog affine open neighborhood $U_c=Spec(R)$ of $c$ such that $R=k[x_1,...,x_n]/I$ and by Hilbert $R$ is noetherian therefore $U_c$ is noetherian (especially as topological space). The proplem is that the argument $R$ noetherian $⇔ Spec(R)$ noetherian works only for affine schemes.
Generally $C$ is not affine so I hornestly don't know how to show that $C$ is a noetherian space in satisfying way. One way to see it is would be to embedd it in a $mathbbP^n$. But I find it a bit overkill like so would like to prefer a more elementary argument basing on the definition of a curve as given above.
algebraic-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $C$ be curve, so a $1$-dimensional, separated $k$-scheme of finite type).
My question is how to see that the underlying topological space of $C$ is a Noetherian space, so satisfies the descending chain condition for closed subsets.
My attempts:
Obviously $C$ is locally noetherian:
Because $C$ is $k$-scheme of finite type so we can find for each $c∈C$ a wlog affine open neighborhood $U_c=Spec(R)$ of $c$ such that $R=k[x_1,...,x_n]/I$ and by Hilbert $R$ is noetherian therefore $U_c$ is noetherian (especially as topological space). The proplem is that the argument $R$ noetherian $⇔ Spec(R)$ noetherian works only for affine schemes.
Generally $C$ is not affine so I hornestly don't know how to show that $C$ is a noetherian space in satisfying way. One way to see it is would be to embedd it in a $mathbbP^n$. But I find it a bit overkill like so would like to prefer a more elementary argument basing on the definition of a curve as given above.
algebraic-geometry
$endgroup$
Let $C$ be curve, so a $1$-dimensional, separated $k$-scheme of finite type).
My question is how to see that the underlying topological space of $C$ is a Noetherian space, so satisfies the descending chain condition for closed subsets.
My attempts:
Obviously $C$ is locally noetherian:
Because $C$ is $k$-scheme of finite type so we can find for each $c∈C$ a wlog affine open neighborhood $U_c=Spec(R)$ of $c$ such that $R=k[x_1,...,x_n]/I$ and by Hilbert $R$ is noetherian therefore $U_c$ is noetherian (especially as topological space). The proplem is that the argument $R$ noetherian $⇔ Spec(R)$ noetherian works only for affine schemes.
Generally $C$ is not affine so I hornestly don't know how to show that $C$ is a noetherian space in satisfying way. One way to see it is would be to embedd it in a $mathbbP^n$. But I find it a bit overkill like so would like to prefer a more elementary argument basing on the definition of a curve as given above.
algebraic-geometry
algebraic-geometry
asked 2 days ago
KarlPeterKarlPeter
5611316
5611316
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $C$ is finite type over $k$, it is quasicompact, so it is covered by finitely many affine open sets (each of which are Noetherian). It follows immediately that $C$ is Noetherian (given any descending sequence of closed sets, intersect it with each affine open set and it must eventually stabilize on each one).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The funny part is that an irreducible separated scheme locally of finite type and dimension 1 over a field is also quasi-compact (there was a MO post)
$endgroup$
– Aknazar Kazhymurat
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164647%2fcurve-is-a-noetherian-topological-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $C$ is finite type over $k$, it is quasicompact, so it is covered by finitely many affine open sets (each of which are Noetherian). It follows immediately that $C$ is Noetherian (given any descending sequence of closed sets, intersect it with each affine open set and it must eventually stabilize on each one).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The funny part is that an irreducible separated scheme locally of finite type and dimension 1 over a field is also quasi-compact (there was a MO post)
$endgroup$
– Aknazar Kazhymurat
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $C$ is finite type over $k$, it is quasicompact, so it is covered by finitely many affine open sets (each of which are Noetherian). It follows immediately that $C$ is Noetherian (given any descending sequence of closed sets, intersect it with each affine open set and it must eventually stabilize on each one).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The funny part is that an irreducible separated scheme locally of finite type and dimension 1 over a field is also quasi-compact (there was a MO post)
$endgroup$
– Aknazar Kazhymurat
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $C$ is finite type over $k$, it is quasicompact, so it is covered by finitely many affine open sets (each of which are Noetherian). It follows immediately that $C$ is Noetherian (given any descending sequence of closed sets, intersect it with each affine open set and it must eventually stabilize on each one).
$endgroup$
Since $C$ is finite type over $k$, it is quasicompact, so it is covered by finitely many affine open sets (each of which are Noetherian). It follows immediately that $C$ is Noetherian (given any descending sequence of closed sets, intersect it with each affine open set and it must eventually stabilize on each one).
answered 2 days ago
Eric WofseyEric Wofsey
191k14216349
191k14216349
$begingroup$
The funny part is that an irreducible separated scheme locally of finite type and dimension 1 over a field is also quasi-compact (there was a MO post)
$endgroup$
– Aknazar Kazhymurat
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The funny part is that an irreducible separated scheme locally of finite type and dimension 1 over a field is also quasi-compact (there was a MO post)
$endgroup$
– Aknazar Kazhymurat
yesterday
$begingroup$
The funny part is that an irreducible separated scheme locally of finite type and dimension 1 over a field is also quasi-compact (there was a MO post)
$endgroup$
– Aknazar Kazhymurat
yesterday
$begingroup$
The funny part is that an irreducible separated scheme locally of finite type and dimension 1 over a field is also quasi-compact (there was a MO post)
$endgroup$
– Aknazar Kazhymurat
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164647%2fcurve-is-a-noetherian-topological-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown