Validating a proof for necessary and sufficient conditions on sets A & B such that $P(A) cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$ The Next CEO of Stack OverflowProof on disjoint union of sets $A$ and $B$Am I correct? State the necessary and sufficient condition for R to be an equivalence relation on A.Difference between “necessary” and “necessary but not sufficient”?Show that a necessary and sufficient condition that $(Acap B)cup C =Acap(Bcup C)$ is that $Csubseteq A$.Sufficient and necessary conditions for |A $circ$ B| = |A $times$ B|Necessary and sufficient conditions $(L_1 circ L_2)/L_2 = L_1$Which condition is necessary and sufficient for $f^-1(f(C)) = C$Proof by cases for setsSufficient and necessary conditions for order relations describing a certain system of setsA sufficient and necessary condition for $Acup (B cap C) = (A cup B) cap C$
Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?
Is "for causing autism in X" grammatical?
Received an invoice from my ex-employer billing me for training; how to handle?
Rotate a column
In excess I'm lethal
Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?
Preparing Indesign booklet with .psd graphics for print
Why do remote companies require working in the US?
Sending manuscript to multiple publishers
I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin
Elegant way to replace substring in a regex with optional groups in Python?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords
Non-deterministic sum of floats
What is the result of assigning to std::vector<T>::begin()?
Complex fractions
Several mode to write the symbol of a vector
What is ( CFMCC ) on ILS approach chart?
Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?
Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?
How to count occurrences of text in a file?
Do I need to enable Dev Hub in my PROD Org?
Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?
Are there any unintended negative consequences to allowing PCs to gain multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game?
Validating a proof for necessary and sufficient conditions on sets A & B such that $P(A) cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowProof on disjoint union of sets $A$ and $B$Am I correct? State the necessary and sufficient condition for R to be an equivalence relation on A.Difference between “necessary” and “necessary but not sufficient”?Show that a necessary and sufficient condition that $(Acap B)cup C =Acap(Bcup C)$ is that $Csubseteq A$.Sufficient and necessary conditions for |A $circ$ B| = |A $times$ B|Necessary and sufficient conditions $(L_1 circ L_2)/L_2 = L_1$Which condition is necessary and sufficient for $f^-1(f(C)) = C$Proof by cases for setsSufficient and necessary conditions for order relations describing a certain system of setsA sufficient and necessary condition for $Acup (B cap C) = (A cup B) cap C$
$begingroup$
Is the solution correct for this?
Problem: Find necessary and sufficient conditions on sets $A$ and $B$ such that the following relation holds among the power sets: $P(A)cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$.
Answer: Suppose first that $Ansubseteq B$ and $Bnsubseteq A$. Then there exists $a in A setminus B$ and $b in B setminus A$. The subset, a,b of $A cup B$ is not a subset of $A$, nor is it a subset of $B$. Thus, we do not have equality.
Suppose that $Asubseteq B$, then $A cup B = B$. So, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ by the definition of power sets. Moreover, all subsets of $A$ are subset of $B$, thus you arrive to $P(A) cup P(B) = P(A cup B)$. It is the same if $B subseteq A$.
Thus, the condition is that $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A.$
discrete-mathematics proof-verification elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is the solution correct for this?
Problem: Find necessary and sufficient conditions on sets $A$ and $B$ such that the following relation holds among the power sets: $P(A)cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$.
Answer: Suppose first that $Ansubseteq B$ and $Bnsubseteq A$. Then there exists $a in A setminus B$ and $b in B setminus A$. The subset, a,b of $A cup B$ is not a subset of $A$, nor is it a subset of $B$. Thus, we do not have equality.
Suppose that $Asubseteq B$, then $A cup B = B$. So, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ by the definition of power sets. Moreover, all subsets of $A$ are subset of $B$, thus you arrive to $P(A) cup P(B) = P(A cup B)$. It is the same if $B subseteq A$.
Thus, the condition is that $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A.$
discrete-mathematics proof-verification elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Gotcha, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is the solution correct for this?
Problem: Find necessary and sufficient conditions on sets $A$ and $B$ such that the following relation holds among the power sets: $P(A)cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$.
Answer: Suppose first that $Ansubseteq B$ and $Bnsubseteq A$. Then there exists $a in A setminus B$ and $b in B setminus A$. The subset, a,b of $A cup B$ is not a subset of $A$, nor is it a subset of $B$. Thus, we do not have equality.
Suppose that $Asubseteq B$, then $A cup B = B$. So, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ by the definition of power sets. Moreover, all subsets of $A$ are subset of $B$, thus you arrive to $P(A) cup P(B) = P(A cup B)$. It is the same if $B subseteq A$.
Thus, the condition is that $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A.$
discrete-mathematics proof-verification elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
Is the solution correct for this?
Problem: Find necessary and sufficient conditions on sets $A$ and $B$ such that the following relation holds among the power sets: $P(A)cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$.
Answer: Suppose first that $Ansubseteq B$ and $Bnsubseteq A$. Then there exists $a in A setminus B$ and $b in B setminus A$. The subset, a,b of $A cup B$ is not a subset of $A$, nor is it a subset of $B$. Thus, we do not have equality.
Suppose that $Asubseteq B$, then $A cup B = B$. So, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ by the definition of power sets. Moreover, all subsets of $A$ are subset of $B$, thus you arrive to $P(A) cup P(B) = P(A cup B)$. It is the same if $B subseteq A$.
Thus, the condition is that $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A.$
discrete-mathematics proof-verification elementary-set-theory
discrete-mathematics proof-verification elementary-set-theory
edited 2 days ago
brucemcmc
asked 2 days ago
brucemcmcbrucemcmc
396
396
$begingroup$
You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Gotcha, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Gotcha, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
2 days ago
$begingroup$
You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Gotcha, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Gotcha, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The first part is good.
When you say
Therefore, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B).$
there is nothing "therefore" about it. $Xsubseteq Ycup X$ is basically the definition of $cup$.
I would prefer to see some justification for why
$$
Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)subseteq P(B)
$$
It doesn't have to be long, as it's a quote obvious fact, but just a couple of words acknowledging that it isn't trivial. It is, after all, the real lynchpin of the entire argument.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Oh, gotcha; thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Solution: $A subseteq (Acup B) implies P(A) subseteq P(Acup B) ; B subseteq (A cup B) implies P(B) subseteq P(A cup B)$.
So, $P(A) cup P(B) subseteq P(Acup B)$ always.
Conversely, lets claim that $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ if and only if $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
Suppose $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
If $Ansubseteq B$ and $ B nsubseteq A$. Then there exists some $xin A$ such that $x notin B$ and $yin B$ such that $ynotin A$. Let S= x,y
Then it is clear that $Ssubseteq (Acup B) implies Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
Also, $Snsubseteq A$ and $S nsubseteq B$ therefore, $xin S$, but $xnotin B$ and $yin S$, but $ynotin A$. Hence $Snotin P(A)$ and $S notin P(B) implies Snotin P(A) cup P(B)$ which is a contradiction because $Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
So, $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
If $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A implies Acup Bsubseteq B$ or $Acup Bsubset A$.
So, $P(Acup B) subseteq P(B)$ or $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) implies P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
Thus, $P(Acup B) = P(A)cup P(B)$ if and only if $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! @bengraham12
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164625%2fvalidating-a-proof-for-necessary-and-sufficient-conditions-on-sets-a-b-such-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The first part is good.
When you say
Therefore, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B).$
there is nothing "therefore" about it. $Xsubseteq Ycup X$ is basically the definition of $cup$.
I would prefer to see some justification for why
$$
Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)subseteq P(B)
$$
It doesn't have to be long, as it's a quote obvious fact, but just a couple of words acknowledging that it isn't trivial. It is, after all, the real lynchpin of the entire argument.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Oh, gotcha; thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first part is good.
When you say
Therefore, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B).$
there is nothing "therefore" about it. $Xsubseteq Ycup X$ is basically the definition of $cup$.
I would prefer to see some justification for why
$$
Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)subseteq P(B)
$$
It doesn't have to be long, as it's a quote obvious fact, but just a couple of words acknowledging that it isn't trivial. It is, after all, the real lynchpin of the entire argument.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Oh, gotcha; thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first part is good.
When you say
Therefore, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B).$
there is nothing "therefore" about it. $Xsubseteq Ycup X$ is basically the definition of $cup$.
I would prefer to see some justification for why
$$
Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)subseteq P(B)
$$
It doesn't have to be long, as it's a quote obvious fact, but just a couple of words acknowledging that it isn't trivial. It is, after all, the real lynchpin of the entire argument.
$endgroup$
The first part is good.
When you say
Therefore, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B).$
there is nothing "therefore" about it. $Xsubseteq Ycup X$ is basically the definition of $cup$.
I would prefer to see some justification for why
$$
Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)subseteq P(B)
$$
It doesn't have to be long, as it's a quote obvious fact, but just a couple of words acknowledging that it isn't trivial. It is, after all, the real lynchpin of the entire argument.
answered 2 days ago
ArthurArthur
120k7121206
120k7121206
$begingroup$
by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Oh, gotcha; thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Oh, gotcha; thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Oh, gotcha; thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Oh, gotcha; thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Solution: $A subseteq (Acup B) implies P(A) subseteq P(Acup B) ; B subseteq (A cup B) implies P(B) subseteq P(A cup B)$.
So, $P(A) cup P(B) subseteq P(Acup B)$ always.
Conversely, lets claim that $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ if and only if $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
Suppose $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
If $Ansubseteq B$ and $ B nsubseteq A$. Then there exists some $xin A$ such that $x notin B$ and $yin B$ such that $ynotin A$. Let S= x,y
Then it is clear that $Ssubseteq (Acup B) implies Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
Also, $Snsubseteq A$ and $S nsubseteq B$ therefore, $xin S$, but $xnotin B$ and $yin S$, but $ynotin A$. Hence $Snotin P(A)$ and $S notin P(B) implies Snotin P(A) cup P(B)$ which is a contradiction because $Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
So, $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
If $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A implies Acup Bsubseteq B$ or $Acup Bsubset A$.
So, $P(Acup B) subseteq P(B)$ or $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) implies P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
Thus, $P(Acup B) = P(A)cup P(B)$ if and only if $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! @bengraham12
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Solution: $A subseteq (Acup B) implies P(A) subseteq P(Acup B) ; B subseteq (A cup B) implies P(B) subseteq P(A cup B)$.
So, $P(A) cup P(B) subseteq P(Acup B)$ always.
Conversely, lets claim that $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ if and only if $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
Suppose $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
If $Ansubseteq B$ and $ B nsubseteq A$. Then there exists some $xin A$ such that $x notin B$ and $yin B$ such that $ynotin A$. Let S= x,y
Then it is clear that $Ssubseteq (Acup B) implies Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
Also, $Snsubseteq A$ and $S nsubseteq B$ therefore, $xin S$, but $xnotin B$ and $yin S$, but $ynotin A$. Hence $Snotin P(A)$ and $S notin P(B) implies Snotin P(A) cup P(B)$ which is a contradiction because $Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
So, $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
If $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A implies Acup Bsubseteq B$ or $Acup Bsubset A$.
So, $P(Acup B) subseteq P(B)$ or $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) implies P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
Thus, $P(Acup B) = P(A)cup P(B)$ if and only if $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! @bengraham12
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Solution: $A subseteq (Acup B) implies P(A) subseteq P(Acup B) ; B subseteq (A cup B) implies P(B) subseteq P(A cup B)$.
So, $P(A) cup P(B) subseteq P(Acup B)$ always.
Conversely, lets claim that $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ if and only if $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
Suppose $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
If $Ansubseteq B$ and $ B nsubseteq A$. Then there exists some $xin A$ such that $x notin B$ and $yin B$ such that $ynotin A$. Let S= x,y
Then it is clear that $Ssubseteq (Acup B) implies Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
Also, $Snsubseteq A$ and $S nsubseteq B$ therefore, $xin S$, but $xnotin B$ and $yin S$, but $ynotin A$. Hence $Snotin P(A)$ and $S notin P(B) implies Snotin P(A) cup P(B)$ which is a contradiction because $Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
So, $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
If $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A implies Acup Bsubseteq B$ or $Acup Bsubset A$.
So, $P(Acup B) subseteq P(B)$ or $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) implies P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
Thus, $P(Acup B) = P(A)cup P(B)$ if and only if $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Solution: $A subseteq (Acup B) implies P(A) subseteq P(Acup B) ; B subseteq (A cup B) implies P(B) subseteq P(A cup B)$.
So, $P(A) cup P(B) subseteq P(Acup B)$ always.
Conversely, lets claim that $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ if and only if $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
Suppose $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
If $Ansubseteq B$ and $ B nsubseteq A$. Then there exists some $xin A$ such that $x notin B$ and $yin B$ such that $ynotin A$. Let S= x,y
Then it is clear that $Ssubseteq (Acup B) implies Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
Also, $Snsubseteq A$ and $S nsubseteq B$ therefore, $xin S$, but $xnotin B$ and $yin S$, but $ynotin A$. Hence $Snotin P(A)$ and $S notin P(B) implies Snotin P(A) cup P(B)$ which is a contradiction because $Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
So, $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
If $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A implies Acup Bsubseteq B$ or $Acup Bsubset A$.
So, $P(Acup B) subseteq P(B)$ or $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) implies P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.
Thus, $P(Acup B) = P(A)cup P(B)$ if and only if $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
bengraham12bengraham12
194
194
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Thank you! @bengraham12
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you! @bengraham12
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you! @bengraham12
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you! @bengraham12
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164625%2fvalidating-a-proof-for-necessary-and-sufficient-conditions-on-sets-a-b-such-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Gotcha, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago
$begingroup$
No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
2 days ago