Validating a proof for necessary and sufficient conditions on sets A & B such that $P(A) cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$ The Next CEO of Stack OverflowProof on disjoint union of sets $A$ and $B$Am I correct? State the necessary and sufficient condition for R to be an equivalence relation on A.Difference between “necessary” and “necessary but not sufficient”?Show that a necessary and sufficient condition that $(Acap B)cup C =Acap(Bcup C)$ is that $Csubseteq A$.Sufficient and necessary conditions for |A $circ$ B| = |A $times$ B|Necessary and sufficient conditions $(L_1 circ L_2)/L_2 = L_1$Which condition is necessary and sufficient for $f^-1(f(C)) = C$Proof by cases for setsSufficient and necessary conditions for order relations describing a certain system of setsA sufficient and necessary condition for $Acup (B cap C) = (A cup B) cap C$

Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?

Is "for causing autism in X" grammatical?

Received an invoice from my ex-employer billing me for training; how to handle?

Rotate a column

In excess I'm lethal

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

Preparing Indesign booklet with .psd graphics for print

Why do remote companies require working in the US?

Sending manuscript to multiple publishers

I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin

Elegant way to replace substring in a regex with optional groups in Python?

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

Non-deterministic sum of floats

What is the result of assigning to std::vector<T>::begin()?

Complex fractions

Several mode to write the symbol of a vector

What is ( CFMCC ) on ILS approach chart?

Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

Do I need to enable Dev Hub in my PROD Org?

Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?

Are there any unintended negative consequences to allowing PCs to gain multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game?



Validating a proof for necessary and sufficient conditions on sets A & B such that $P(A) cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowProof on disjoint union of sets $A$ and $B$Am I correct? State the necessary and sufficient condition for R to be an equivalence relation on A.Difference between “necessary” and “necessary but not sufficient”?Show that a necessary and sufficient condition that $(Acap B)cup C =Acap(Bcup C)$ is that $Csubseteq A$.Sufficient and necessary conditions for |A $circ$ B| = |A $times$ B|Necessary and sufficient conditions $(L_1 circ L_2)/L_2 = L_1$Which condition is necessary and sufficient for $f^-1(f(C)) = C$Proof by cases for setsSufficient and necessary conditions for order relations describing a certain system of setsA sufficient and necessary condition for $Acup (B cap C) = (A cup B) cap C$










2












$begingroup$


Is the solution correct for this?



Problem: Find necessary and sufficient conditions on sets $A$ and $B$ such that the following relation holds among the power sets: $P(A)cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$.



Answer: Suppose first that $Ansubseteq B$ and $Bnsubseteq A$. Then there exists $a in A setminus B$ and $b in B setminus A$. The subset, a,b of $A cup B$ is not a subset of $A$, nor is it a subset of $B$. Thus, we do not have equality.



Suppose that $Asubseteq B$, then $A cup B = B$. So, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ by the definition of power sets. Moreover, all subsets of $A$ are subset of $B$, thus you arrive to $P(A) cup P(B) = P(A cup B)$. It is the same if $B subseteq A$.



Thus, the condition is that $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A.$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Gotcha, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
    $endgroup$
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    2 days ago















2












$begingroup$


Is the solution correct for this?



Problem: Find necessary and sufficient conditions on sets $A$ and $B$ such that the following relation holds among the power sets: $P(A)cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$.



Answer: Suppose first that $Ansubseteq B$ and $Bnsubseteq A$. Then there exists $a in A setminus B$ and $b in B setminus A$. The subset, a,b of $A cup B$ is not a subset of $A$, nor is it a subset of $B$. Thus, we do not have equality.



Suppose that $Asubseteq B$, then $A cup B = B$. So, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ by the definition of power sets. Moreover, all subsets of $A$ are subset of $B$, thus you arrive to $P(A) cup P(B) = P(A cup B)$. It is the same if $B subseteq A$.



Thus, the condition is that $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A.$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Gotcha, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
    $endgroup$
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    2 days ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Is the solution correct for this?



Problem: Find necessary and sufficient conditions on sets $A$ and $B$ such that the following relation holds among the power sets: $P(A)cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$.



Answer: Suppose first that $Ansubseteq B$ and $Bnsubseteq A$. Then there exists $a in A setminus B$ and $b in B setminus A$. The subset, a,b of $A cup B$ is not a subset of $A$, nor is it a subset of $B$. Thus, we do not have equality.



Suppose that $Asubseteq B$, then $A cup B = B$. So, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ by the definition of power sets. Moreover, all subsets of $A$ are subset of $B$, thus you arrive to $P(A) cup P(B) = P(A cup B)$. It is the same if $B subseteq A$.



Thus, the condition is that $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A.$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is the solution correct for this?



Problem: Find necessary and sufficient conditions on sets $A$ and $B$ such that the following relation holds among the power sets: $P(A)cup P(B) = P(Acup B)$.



Answer: Suppose first that $Ansubseteq B$ and $Bnsubseteq A$. Then there exists $a in A setminus B$ and $b in B setminus A$. The subset, a,b of $A cup B$ is not a subset of $A$, nor is it a subset of $B$. Thus, we do not have equality.



Suppose that $Asubseteq B$, then $A cup B = B$. So, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ by the definition of power sets. Moreover, all subsets of $A$ are subset of $B$, thus you arrive to $P(A) cup P(B) = P(A cup B)$. It is the same if $B subseteq A$.



Thus, the condition is that $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A.$







discrete-mathematics proof-verification elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







brucemcmc

















asked 2 days ago









brucemcmcbrucemcmc

396




396











  • $begingroup$
    You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Gotcha, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
    $endgroup$
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Gotcha, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
    $endgroup$
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago




$begingroup$
You need to clean up your notation. Sets can admit the symbols $subseteq$ and $cap$ and $cup,$ but probabilities do not - they are real numbers. For example, $P(B)subseteq P(A)cup P(B)$ is nonsense.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago












$begingroup$
we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago





$begingroup$
we are dealing with power sets. My bad that I did not make that clear. @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago













$begingroup$
Gotcha, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Gotcha, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago












$begingroup$
No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago




$begingroup$
No worries, my bad for the confusion! @AdrianKeister
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago












$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
2 days ago




$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister its powerset, not probability.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The first part is good.



When you say




Therefore, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B).$




there is nothing "therefore" about it. $Xsubseteq Ycup X$ is basically the definition of $cup$.



I would prefer to see some justification for why
$$
Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)subseteq P(B)
$$

It doesn't have to be long, as it's a quote obvious fact, but just a couple of words acknowledging that it isn't trivial. It is, after all, the real lynchpin of the entire argument.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, gotcha; thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago


















1












$begingroup$

Solution: $A subseteq (Acup B) implies P(A) subseteq P(Acup B) ; B subseteq (A cup B) implies P(B) subseteq P(A cup B)$.



So, $P(A) cup P(B) subseteq P(Acup B)$ always.



Conversely, lets claim that $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ if and only if $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.



Suppose $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



If $Ansubseteq B$ and $ B nsubseteq A$. Then there exists some $xin A$ such that $x notin B$ and $yin B$ such that $ynotin A$. Let S= x,y



Then it is clear that $Ssubseteq (Acup B) implies Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



Also, $Snsubseteq A$ and $S nsubseteq B$ therefore, $xin S$, but $xnotin B$ and $yin S$, but $ynotin A$. Hence $Snotin P(A)$ and $S notin P(B) implies Snotin P(A) cup P(B)$ which is a contradiction because $Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



So, $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.



If $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A implies Acup Bsubseteq B$ or $Acup Bsubset A$.



So, $P(Acup B) subseteq P(B)$ or $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) implies P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



Thus, $P(Acup B) = P(A)cup P(B)$ if and only if $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




bengraham12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! @bengraham12
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164625%2fvalidating-a-proof-for-necessary-and-sufficient-conditions-on-sets-a-b-such-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

The first part is good.



When you say




Therefore, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B).$




there is nothing "therefore" about it. $Xsubseteq Ycup X$ is basically the definition of $cup$.



I would prefer to see some justification for why
$$
Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)subseteq P(B)
$$

It doesn't have to be long, as it's a quote obvious fact, but just a couple of words acknowledging that it isn't trivial. It is, after all, the real lynchpin of the entire argument.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, gotcha; thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago















1












$begingroup$

The first part is good.



When you say




Therefore, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B).$




there is nothing "therefore" about it. $Xsubseteq Ycup X$ is basically the definition of $cup$.



I would prefer to see some justification for why
$$
Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)subseteq P(B)
$$

It doesn't have to be long, as it's a quote obvious fact, but just a couple of words acknowledging that it isn't trivial. It is, after all, the real lynchpin of the entire argument.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, gotcha; thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$

The first part is good.



When you say




Therefore, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B).$




there is nothing "therefore" about it. $Xsubseteq Ycup X$ is basically the definition of $cup$.



I would prefer to see some justification for why
$$
Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)subseteq P(B)
$$

It doesn't have to be long, as it's a quote obvious fact, but just a couple of words acknowledging that it isn't trivial. It is, after all, the real lynchpin of the entire argument.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The first part is good.



When you say




Therefore, $P(B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B).$




there is nothing "therefore" about it. $Xsubseteq Ycup X$ is basically the definition of $cup$.



I would prefer to see some justification for why
$$
Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)subseteq P(B)
$$

It doesn't have to be long, as it's a quote obvious fact, but just a couple of words acknowledging that it isn't trivial. It is, after all, the real lynchpin of the entire argument.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









ArthurArthur

120k7121206




120k7121206











  • $begingroup$
    by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, gotcha; thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, gotcha; thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago




$begingroup$
by definition of power set can we not say that $A subseteq B implies P(A) subseteq P(B)$ ? Also, instead of therefore, can i just say "So." Moreover thank you for the response.
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Do you mean $Asubseteq Bimplies P(A)le P(B)?$
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago












$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago




$begingroup$
@AdrianKeister These aren't probabilities, but power sets.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Oh, gotcha; thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Oh, gotcha; thanks!
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
2 days ago











1












$begingroup$

Solution: $A subseteq (Acup B) implies P(A) subseteq P(Acup B) ; B subseteq (A cup B) implies P(B) subseteq P(A cup B)$.



So, $P(A) cup P(B) subseteq P(Acup B)$ always.



Conversely, lets claim that $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ if and only if $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.



Suppose $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



If $Ansubseteq B$ and $ B nsubseteq A$. Then there exists some $xin A$ such that $x notin B$ and $yin B$ such that $ynotin A$. Let S= x,y



Then it is clear that $Ssubseteq (Acup B) implies Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



Also, $Snsubseteq A$ and $S nsubseteq B$ therefore, $xin S$, but $xnotin B$ and $yin S$, but $ynotin A$. Hence $Snotin P(A)$ and $S notin P(B) implies Snotin P(A) cup P(B)$ which is a contradiction because $Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



So, $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.



If $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A implies Acup Bsubseteq B$ or $Acup Bsubset A$.



So, $P(Acup B) subseteq P(B)$ or $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) implies P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



Thus, $P(Acup B) = P(A)cup P(B)$ if and only if $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




bengraham12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! @bengraham12
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago















1












$begingroup$

Solution: $A subseteq (Acup B) implies P(A) subseteq P(Acup B) ; B subseteq (A cup B) implies P(B) subseteq P(A cup B)$.



So, $P(A) cup P(B) subseteq P(Acup B)$ always.



Conversely, lets claim that $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ if and only if $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.



Suppose $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



If $Ansubseteq B$ and $ B nsubseteq A$. Then there exists some $xin A$ such that $x notin B$ and $yin B$ such that $ynotin A$. Let S= x,y



Then it is clear that $Ssubseteq (Acup B) implies Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



Also, $Snsubseteq A$ and $S nsubseteq B$ therefore, $xin S$, but $xnotin B$ and $yin S$, but $ynotin A$. Hence $Snotin P(A)$ and $S notin P(B) implies Snotin P(A) cup P(B)$ which is a contradiction because $Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



So, $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.



If $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A implies Acup Bsubseteq B$ or $Acup Bsubset A$.



So, $P(Acup B) subseteq P(B)$ or $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) implies P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



Thus, $P(Acup B) = P(A)cup P(B)$ if and only if $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




bengraham12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! @bengraham12
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$

Solution: $A subseteq (Acup B) implies P(A) subseteq P(Acup B) ; B subseteq (A cup B) implies P(B) subseteq P(A cup B)$.



So, $P(A) cup P(B) subseteq P(Acup B)$ always.



Conversely, lets claim that $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ if and only if $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.



Suppose $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



If $Ansubseteq B$ and $ B nsubseteq A$. Then there exists some $xin A$ such that $x notin B$ and $yin B$ such that $ynotin A$. Let S= x,y



Then it is clear that $Ssubseteq (Acup B) implies Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



Also, $Snsubseteq A$ and $S nsubseteq B$ therefore, $xin S$, but $xnotin B$ and $yin S$, but $ynotin A$. Hence $Snotin P(A)$ and $S notin P(B) implies Snotin P(A) cup P(B)$ which is a contradiction because $Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



So, $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.



If $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A implies Acup Bsubseteq B$ or $Acup Bsubset A$.



So, $P(Acup B) subseteq P(B)$ or $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) implies P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



Thus, $P(Acup B) = P(A)cup P(B)$ if and only if $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




bengraham12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$



Solution: $A subseteq (Acup B) implies P(A) subseteq P(Acup B) ; B subseteq (A cup B) implies P(B) subseteq P(A cup B)$.



So, $P(A) cup P(B) subseteq P(Acup B)$ always.



Conversely, lets claim that $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$ if and only if $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.



Suppose $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



If $Ansubseteq B$ and $ B nsubseteq A$. Then there exists some $xin A$ such that $x notin B$ and $yin B$ such that $ynotin A$. Let S= x,y



Then it is clear that $Ssubseteq (Acup B) implies Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



Also, $Snsubseteq A$ and $S nsubseteq B$ therefore, $xin S$, but $xnotin B$ and $yin S$, but $ynotin A$. Hence $Snotin P(A)$ and $S notin P(B) implies Snotin P(A) cup P(B)$ which is a contradiction because $Sin P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



So, $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.



If $Asubseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A implies Acup Bsubseteq B$ or $Acup Bsubset A$.



So, $P(Acup B) subseteq P(B)$ or $P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) implies P(Acup B) subseteq P(A) cup P(B)$.



Thus, $P(Acup B) = P(A)cup P(B)$ if and only if $A subseteq B$ or $Bsubseteq A$.







share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




bengraham12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer






New contributor




bengraham12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 2 days ago









bengraham12bengraham12

194




194




New contributor




bengraham12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





bengraham12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






bengraham12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! @bengraham12
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! @bengraham12
    $endgroup$
    – brucemcmc
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
Thank you! @bengraham12
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Thank you! @bengraham12
$endgroup$
– brucemcmc
2 days ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164625%2fvalidating-a-proof-for-necessary-and-sufficient-conditions-on-sets-a-b-such-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire