prime numbers in an interval, binomial coefficientsApproximating number of partitions of $n$, denoted $p(n)$, by $p(n)ge e^csqrt n$Approximating prime number functionCardinality of the set of prime numbersSum of the first n Prime numbersDetermining if a number is primeExistence of a prime in an interval that is not a linear combination of two specified primes?Approximating number of partitions of $n$, denoted $p(n)$, by $p(n)ge e^csqrt n$prove that the product of primes in a given interval is less than or equal to binomasymptotic bound on number of primes from 1 to nBinomial Coefficients involving Prime Powers Minus 1Product of all prime numbers on the interval [m+1, 2m] is $le left(beginmatrix 2m \mendmatrixright)$

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

can i play a electric guitar through a bass amp?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Has the BBC provided arguments for saying Brexit being cancelled is unlikely?

Today is the Center

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

How do I create uniquely male characters?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

What's the output of a record cartridge playing an out-of-speed record

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

Is it important to consider tone, melody, and musical form while writing a song?

Why dont electromagnetic waves interact with each other?

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine



prime numbers in an interval, binomial coefficients


Approximating number of partitions of $n$, denoted $p(n)$, by $p(n)ge e^csqrt n$Approximating prime number functionCardinality of the set of prime numbersSum of the first n Prime numbersDetermining if a number is primeExistence of a prime in an interval that is not a linear combination of two specified primes?Approximating number of partitions of $n$, denoted $p(n)$, by $p(n)ge e^csqrt n$prove that the product of primes in a given interval is less than or equal to binomasymptotic bound on number of primes from 1 to nBinomial Coefficients involving Prime Powers Minus 1Product of all prime numbers on the interval [m+1, 2m] is $le left(beginmatrix 2m \mendmatrixright)$













0












$begingroup$


I have two combinatoric questions:



  1. Let $p(n)$ denote the number of unordered sets of positive integers whose sum is $n$. I proved that:
    $$p(n) geq max_1leq kleq nleftfrac1k!n-1 choose k-1 right.$$
    I need to use it to show that there is an absolute constant $c > 0$ for which:
    $$p(n) geq e^csqrtn$$
    I don't know about any lower bound that involves $e$ and I'm really stuck.


  2. Let $pi(m, n)$ denote the set of prime numbers in the interval $[m,n]$.
    I showed that the product of all the prime numbers between $1$ to $n$ less than or equal to $4^n$.
    I need to show that $|pi(1, n)|$ = $O(n/log n)$.
    I thought of maybe showing it by induction, dividing the interval of $(1,n)$ to $(1,sqrtn)$ and$(sqrt n,n)$ but it did'nt work.


I know this is a lot but I can really use some help.
Thank you so much!!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    I have two combinatoric questions:



    1. Let $p(n)$ denote the number of unordered sets of positive integers whose sum is $n$. I proved that:
      $$p(n) geq max_1leq kleq nleftfrac1k!n-1 choose k-1 right.$$
      I need to use it to show that there is an absolute constant $c > 0$ for which:
      $$p(n) geq e^csqrtn$$
      I don't know about any lower bound that involves $e$ and I'm really stuck.


    2. Let $pi(m, n)$ denote the set of prime numbers in the interval $[m,n]$.
      I showed that the product of all the prime numbers between $1$ to $n$ less than or equal to $4^n$.
      I need to show that $|pi(1, n)|$ = $O(n/log n)$.
      I thought of maybe showing it by induction, dividing the interval of $(1,n)$ to $(1,sqrtn)$ and$(sqrt n,n)$ but it did'nt work.


    I know this is a lot but I can really use some help.
    Thank you so much!!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I have two combinatoric questions:



      1. Let $p(n)$ denote the number of unordered sets of positive integers whose sum is $n$. I proved that:
        $$p(n) geq max_1leq kleq nleftfrac1k!n-1 choose k-1 right.$$
        I need to use it to show that there is an absolute constant $c > 0$ for which:
        $$p(n) geq e^csqrtn$$
        I don't know about any lower bound that involves $e$ and I'm really stuck.


      2. Let $pi(m, n)$ denote the set of prime numbers in the interval $[m,n]$.
        I showed that the product of all the prime numbers between $1$ to $n$ less than or equal to $4^n$.
        I need to show that $|pi(1, n)|$ = $O(n/log n)$.
        I thought of maybe showing it by induction, dividing the interval of $(1,n)$ to $(1,sqrtn)$ and$(sqrt n,n)$ but it did'nt work.


      I know this is a lot but I can really use some help.
      Thank you so much!!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have two combinatoric questions:



      1. Let $p(n)$ denote the number of unordered sets of positive integers whose sum is $n$. I proved that:
        $$p(n) geq max_1leq kleq nleftfrac1k!n-1 choose k-1 right.$$
        I need to use it to show that there is an absolute constant $c > 0$ for which:
        $$p(n) geq e^csqrtn$$
        I don't know about any lower bound that involves $e$ and I'm really stuck.


      2. Let $pi(m, n)$ denote the set of prime numbers in the interval $[m,n]$.
        I showed that the product of all the prime numbers between $1$ to $n$ less than or equal to $4^n$.
        I need to show that $|pi(1, n)|$ = $O(n/log n)$.
        I thought of maybe showing it by induction, dividing the interval of $(1,n)$ to $(1,sqrtn)$ and$(sqrt n,n)$ but it did'nt work.


      I know this is a lot but I can really use some help.
      Thank you so much!!







      combinatorics prime-numbers






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 29 at 17:01









      Brian

      1,268216




      1,268216










      asked Mar 29 at 16:17









      J.NJ.N

      52




      52




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Well, for starters, for what value of $k$ is $f(n,k)=frac1k!binomn-1k-1$ maximized? Consider the ratio
          $$
          fracp(n,k+1)p(n,k)=fracn-kk(k+1)
          $$

          This ratio starts above one when $k$ is small, and ends below one when $k$ is close to $n$. The time when the ratio goes from above one to below one is where $p(n,k)$ is maximized. We can see this occurs at about $kapprox -1+sqrt[]n+1$, suggesting that plugging in $sqrtn$ for $k$ into that inequality should give the best bound on $p(n)$. In other words, you should use
          $$
          p(n)ge frac1(sqrtn)!binomn-1sqrt n-1
          $$

          and show the right hand side to be grows faster than $e^csqrtn$. To do this, use Stirling's approximation.




          The product of $pi(n)$ distinct numbers positive integers is at least $pi(n)$!. Since you know the product of the $pi(n)$ primes in $[1,n]$ is at most $4^n$, this tells you
          $$
          pi(n)!le 4^n
          $$

          If $pi(n)$ was not $O(n/log n)$, then it follow that $pi(n)=C(n)n/log n$, where $C(n)$ is some function which is not bounded, meaning $C(n)$ can be made arbitrarily large by plugging in an appropriate $n$. So show that
          $$
          (C(n)n/log n)!le 4^n
          $$

          leads to a contradiction for such a function $C(n)$. Again, Stirling's approximation is indispensable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167306%2fprime-numbers-in-an-interval-binomial-coefficients%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Well, for starters, for what value of $k$ is $f(n,k)=frac1k!binomn-1k-1$ maximized? Consider the ratio
            $$
            fracp(n,k+1)p(n,k)=fracn-kk(k+1)
            $$

            This ratio starts above one when $k$ is small, and ends below one when $k$ is close to $n$. The time when the ratio goes from above one to below one is where $p(n,k)$ is maximized. We can see this occurs at about $kapprox -1+sqrt[]n+1$, suggesting that plugging in $sqrtn$ for $k$ into that inequality should give the best bound on $p(n)$. In other words, you should use
            $$
            p(n)ge frac1(sqrtn)!binomn-1sqrt n-1
            $$

            and show the right hand side to be grows faster than $e^csqrtn$. To do this, use Stirling's approximation.




            The product of $pi(n)$ distinct numbers positive integers is at least $pi(n)$!. Since you know the product of the $pi(n)$ primes in $[1,n]$ is at most $4^n$, this tells you
            $$
            pi(n)!le 4^n
            $$

            If $pi(n)$ was not $O(n/log n)$, then it follow that $pi(n)=C(n)n/log n$, where $C(n)$ is some function which is not bounded, meaning $C(n)$ can be made arbitrarily large by plugging in an appropriate $n$. So show that
            $$
            (C(n)n/log n)!le 4^n
            $$

            leads to a contradiction for such a function $C(n)$. Again, Stirling's approximation is indispensable.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              Well, for starters, for what value of $k$ is $f(n,k)=frac1k!binomn-1k-1$ maximized? Consider the ratio
              $$
              fracp(n,k+1)p(n,k)=fracn-kk(k+1)
              $$

              This ratio starts above one when $k$ is small, and ends below one when $k$ is close to $n$. The time when the ratio goes from above one to below one is where $p(n,k)$ is maximized. We can see this occurs at about $kapprox -1+sqrt[]n+1$, suggesting that plugging in $sqrtn$ for $k$ into that inequality should give the best bound on $p(n)$. In other words, you should use
              $$
              p(n)ge frac1(sqrtn)!binomn-1sqrt n-1
              $$

              and show the right hand side to be grows faster than $e^csqrtn$. To do this, use Stirling's approximation.




              The product of $pi(n)$ distinct numbers positive integers is at least $pi(n)$!. Since you know the product of the $pi(n)$ primes in $[1,n]$ is at most $4^n$, this tells you
              $$
              pi(n)!le 4^n
              $$

              If $pi(n)$ was not $O(n/log n)$, then it follow that $pi(n)=C(n)n/log n$, where $C(n)$ is some function which is not bounded, meaning $C(n)$ can be made arbitrarily large by plugging in an appropriate $n$. So show that
              $$
              (C(n)n/log n)!le 4^n
              $$

              leads to a contradiction for such a function $C(n)$. Again, Stirling's approximation is indispensable.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Well, for starters, for what value of $k$ is $f(n,k)=frac1k!binomn-1k-1$ maximized? Consider the ratio
                $$
                fracp(n,k+1)p(n,k)=fracn-kk(k+1)
                $$

                This ratio starts above one when $k$ is small, and ends below one when $k$ is close to $n$. The time when the ratio goes from above one to below one is where $p(n,k)$ is maximized. We can see this occurs at about $kapprox -1+sqrt[]n+1$, suggesting that plugging in $sqrtn$ for $k$ into that inequality should give the best bound on $p(n)$. In other words, you should use
                $$
                p(n)ge frac1(sqrtn)!binomn-1sqrt n-1
                $$

                and show the right hand side to be grows faster than $e^csqrtn$. To do this, use Stirling's approximation.




                The product of $pi(n)$ distinct numbers positive integers is at least $pi(n)$!. Since you know the product of the $pi(n)$ primes in $[1,n]$ is at most $4^n$, this tells you
                $$
                pi(n)!le 4^n
                $$

                If $pi(n)$ was not $O(n/log n)$, then it follow that $pi(n)=C(n)n/log n$, where $C(n)$ is some function which is not bounded, meaning $C(n)$ can be made arbitrarily large by plugging in an appropriate $n$. So show that
                $$
                (C(n)n/log n)!le 4^n
                $$

                leads to a contradiction for such a function $C(n)$. Again, Stirling's approximation is indispensable.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Well, for starters, for what value of $k$ is $f(n,k)=frac1k!binomn-1k-1$ maximized? Consider the ratio
                $$
                fracp(n,k+1)p(n,k)=fracn-kk(k+1)
                $$

                This ratio starts above one when $k$ is small, and ends below one when $k$ is close to $n$. The time when the ratio goes from above one to below one is where $p(n,k)$ is maximized. We can see this occurs at about $kapprox -1+sqrt[]n+1$, suggesting that plugging in $sqrtn$ for $k$ into that inequality should give the best bound on $p(n)$. In other words, you should use
                $$
                p(n)ge frac1(sqrtn)!binomn-1sqrt n-1
                $$

                and show the right hand side to be grows faster than $e^csqrtn$. To do this, use Stirling's approximation.




                The product of $pi(n)$ distinct numbers positive integers is at least $pi(n)$!. Since you know the product of the $pi(n)$ primes in $[1,n]$ is at most $4^n$, this tells you
                $$
                pi(n)!le 4^n
                $$

                If $pi(n)$ was not $O(n/log n)$, then it follow that $pi(n)=C(n)n/log n$, where $C(n)$ is some function which is not bounded, meaning $C(n)$ can be made arbitrarily large by plugging in an appropriate $n$. So show that
                $$
                (C(n)n/log n)!le 4^n
                $$

                leads to a contradiction for such a function $C(n)$. Again, Stirling's approximation is indispensable.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 29 at 18:18









                Mike EarnestMike Earnest

                27k22152




                27k22152



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167306%2fprime-numbers-in-an-interval-binomial-coefficients%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                    Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                    Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire