Number of solutions to the equation $x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n = k$ when $0 leq x_i leq m$ and $m + 1 leq k leq 2m + 1$Number of integer solutions if $x_1leq x_2leq x_3leq cdotsleq x_rleq k$Number of integer solutions of $x_1+x_2+⋯+x_n=m$ when $x_i$ can be negative, simpler solutionNumber of solutions of $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 = 14$ such that $x_i le 6$The Number of Increasing Vectors $(x_1,…,x_k)$ Satisfying $1 leq x_i leq n$ and $x_1 < x_2 <…<x_k$Find the number of integer solutions to $x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4= 30$ where $0leq x_n <10$ for $1leq n leq 4$Product of $x_1,x_2, ldots, x_n$Find the number of integer solutions of $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 = 16$, with $x_i geq 0$, $x_1$ odd, $x_2$ even, $x_3$ prime.How many solutions are there to the equation $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 leq 35$ in which all the $x_i$ are non-negative integers?Product of $x_1, x_2, ldots, x_n$ on circleHow to find a number of solutions for $x_1+x_2+ldots+x_n=r$ where $r$ is divisible by 3 and for a given $l$ and $r$ such that $lleq x_i leq r$?

Test whether all array elements are factors of a number

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions

Why do falling prices hurt debtors?

Test if tikzmark exists on same page

Writing rule stating superpower from different root cause is bad writing

Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digits

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Why not use SQL instead of GraphQL?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?

TGV timetables / schedules?

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

What's the output of a record cartridge playing an out-of-speed record

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Modeling an IPv4 Address

How to write a macro that is braces sensitive?

Today is the Center

Collect Fourier series terms

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)



Number of solutions to the equation $x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n = k$ when $0 leq x_i leq m$ and $m + 1 leq k leq 2m + 1$


Number of integer solutions if $x_1leq x_2leq x_3leq cdotsleq x_rleq k$Number of integer solutions of $x_1+x_2+⋯+x_n=m$ when $x_i$ can be negative, simpler solutionNumber of solutions of $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 = 14$ such that $x_i le 6$The Number of Increasing Vectors $(x_1,…,x_k)$ Satisfying $1 leq x_i leq n$ and $x_1 < x_2 <…<x_k$Find the number of integer solutions to $x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4= 30$ where $0leq x_n <10$ for $1leq n leq 4$Product of $x_1,x_2, ldots, x_n$Find the number of integer solutions of $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 = 16$, with $x_i geq 0$, $x_1$ odd, $x_2$ even, $x_3$ prime.How many solutions are there to the equation $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 leq 35$ in which all the $x_i$ are non-negative integers?Product of $x_1, x_2, ldots, x_n$ on circleHow to find a number of solutions for $x_1+x_2+ldots+x_n=r$ where $r$ is divisible by 3 and for a given $l$ and $r$ such that $lleq x_i leq r$?













3












$begingroup$


The problem:



Find the number of solutions to the equation: $x_1+x_2+...+x_n=k$ when $0leq x_ileq m$ and $m+1leq kleq 2m+1$.



The answer in the book is $n+k-1choose k-nchoose 1n+k-(m+1)-1choose k-(m+1)$.



I understand that the idea is taking all solutions, a number equals to $n+k-1choose k$ and then subtracting "bad" solutions, and that $nchoose 1$ is there because we can't have more than a single $i$ so $x_igeq m+1$, what I can't understand is the last part. I think it works only if the "bad" element equals exactly $m+1$, but what if it equals $m+2$? That way it doesn't seem correct anymore.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    The problem:



    Find the number of solutions to the equation: $x_1+x_2+...+x_n=k$ when $0leq x_ileq m$ and $m+1leq kleq 2m+1$.



    The answer in the book is $n+k-1choose k-nchoose 1n+k-(m+1)-1choose k-(m+1)$.



    I understand that the idea is taking all solutions, a number equals to $n+k-1choose k$ and then subtracting "bad" solutions, and that $nchoose 1$ is there because we can't have more than a single $i$ so $x_igeq m+1$, what I can't understand is the last part. I think it works only if the "bad" element equals exactly $m+1$, but what if it equals $m+2$? That way it doesn't seem correct anymore.



    Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      The problem:



      Find the number of solutions to the equation: $x_1+x_2+...+x_n=k$ when $0leq x_ileq m$ and $m+1leq kleq 2m+1$.



      The answer in the book is $n+k-1choose k-nchoose 1n+k-(m+1)-1choose k-(m+1)$.



      I understand that the idea is taking all solutions, a number equals to $n+k-1choose k$ and then subtracting "bad" solutions, and that $nchoose 1$ is there because we can't have more than a single $i$ so $x_igeq m+1$, what I can't understand is the last part. I think it works only if the "bad" element equals exactly $m+1$, but what if it equals $m+2$? That way it doesn't seem correct anymore.



      Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The problem:



      Find the number of solutions to the equation: $x_1+x_2+...+x_n=k$ when $0leq x_ileq m$ and $m+1leq kleq 2m+1$.



      The answer in the book is $n+k-1choose k-nchoose 1n+k-(m+1)-1choose k-(m+1)$.



      I understand that the idea is taking all solutions, a number equals to $n+k-1choose k$ and then subtracting "bad" solutions, and that $nchoose 1$ is there because we can't have more than a single $i$ so $x_igeq m+1$, what I can't understand is the last part. I think it works only if the "bad" element equals exactly $m+1$, but what if it equals $m+2$? That way it doesn't seem correct anymore.



      Thanks in advance.







      combinatorics combinations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 29 at 15:46









      N. F. Taussig

      45k103358




      45k103358










      asked Mar 29 at 12:53









      איתן לויאיתן לוי

      795




      795




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          A solution of the equation in the nonnegative integers
          $$x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n = k tag1$$
          corresponds to the placement of $n - 1$ addition signs in a row of $k$ ones. For instance, if $n = 4$ and $k = 10$,
          $$1 1 + + 1 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 1$$
          corresponds to the solution $x_1 = 2$, $x_2 = 0$, $x_3 = 5$, $x_4 = 3$. The number of such solutions is
          $$binomk + n - 1n - 1 = binomk + n - 1k$$
          since we must choose which $n - 1$ of the $k + n - 1$ positions required for $k$ ones and $n - 1$ addition signs will be filled with addition signs or, equivalently, which $k$ of the $k + n - 1$ positions will be filled with ones.



          We wish to solve equation 1 in the nonnegative integers not larger than $m$ when $m + 1 leq k leq 2m + 1$. Thus, we must subtract those solutions in which a variable exceeds $m$. At most one variable may exceed $m$ since $2(m + 1) = 2m + 2 > 2m + 1$.



          We may choose a variable that exceeds $m$ in $n$ ways. Suppose that variable is $x_1$. Then $x_1' = x_1 - (m + 1)$ is a nonnegative integer. Substituting $x_1' + m + 1$ into equation 1 equation yields
          beginalign*
          x_1' + m + 1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k\
          x_1' + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k - (m + 1) tag2
          endalign*

          Equation 2 is an equation in the nonnegative integers with
          $$binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1n - 1 = binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
          solutions. Hence, there are
          $$binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1n - 1 = binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
          solutions in which one of the variables exceeds $m$.



          Thus, there are
          $$binomk + n - 1k - binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
          admissible solutions.



          Notice that in equation 2, $m + 1 leq x_1 leq 2m + 1 implies 0 leq x_1' leq m$. It does not imply that $x_1 = m + 1$.



          Let's compare this with what would happen if $x_1 = m + 1$. Then we would have
          beginalign*
          m + 1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k\
          x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k - (m + 1)
          endalign*

          which is an equation in the nonnegative integers with
          $$binomk - (m + 1) + (n - 1) - 1(n - 1) - 1 = binomk - (m + 1) + (n - 1) - 1k - (m + 1)$$
          solutions, which is a smaller number as we would expect.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167115%2fnumber-of-solutions-to-the-equation-x-1-x-2-ldots-x-n-k-when-0-leq%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            A solution of the equation in the nonnegative integers
            $$x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n = k tag1$$
            corresponds to the placement of $n - 1$ addition signs in a row of $k$ ones. For instance, if $n = 4$ and $k = 10$,
            $$1 1 + + 1 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 1$$
            corresponds to the solution $x_1 = 2$, $x_2 = 0$, $x_3 = 5$, $x_4 = 3$. The number of such solutions is
            $$binomk + n - 1n - 1 = binomk + n - 1k$$
            since we must choose which $n - 1$ of the $k + n - 1$ positions required for $k$ ones and $n - 1$ addition signs will be filled with addition signs or, equivalently, which $k$ of the $k + n - 1$ positions will be filled with ones.



            We wish to solve equation 1 in the nonnegative integers not larger than $m$ when $m + 1 leq k leq 2m + 1$. Thus, we must subtract those solutions in which a variable exceeds $m$. At most one variable may exceed $m$ since $2(m + 1) = 2m + 2 > 2m + 1$.



            We may choose a variable that exceeds $m$ in $n$ ways. Suppose that variable is $x_1$. Then $x_1' = x_1 - (m + 1)$ is a nonnegative integer. Substituting $x_1' + m + 1$ into equation 1 equation yields
            beginalign*
            x_1' + m + 1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k\
            x_1' + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k - (m + 1) tag2
            endalign*

            Equation 2 is an equation in the nonnegative integers with
            $$binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1n - 1 = binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
            solutions. Hence, there are
            $$binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1n - 1 = binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
            solutions in which one of the variables exceeds $m$.



            Thus, there are
            $$binomk + n - 1k - binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
            admissible solutions.



            Notice that in equation 2, $m + 1 leq x_1 leq 2m + 1 implies 0 leq x_1' leq m$. It does not imply that $x_1 = m + 1$.



            Let's compare this with what would happen if $x_1 = m + 1$. Then we would have
            beginalign*
            m + 1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k\
            x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k - (m + 1)
            endalign*

            which is an equation in the nonnegative integers with
            $$binomk - (m + 1) + (n - 1) - 1(n - 1) - 1 = binomk - (m + 1) + (n - 1) - 1k - (m + 1)$$
            solutions, which is a smaller number as we would expect.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              3












              $begingroup$

              A solution of the equation in the nonnegative integers
              $$x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n = k tag1$$
              corresponds to the placement of $n - 1$ addition signs in a row of $k$ ones. For instance, if $n = 4$ and $k = 10$,
              $$1 1 + + 1 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 1$$
              corresponds to the solution $x_1 = 2$, $x_2 = 0$, $x_3 = 5$, $x_4 = 3$. The number of such solutions is
              $$binomk + n - 1n - 1 = binomk + n - 1k$$
              since we must choose which $n - 1$ of the $k + n - 1$ positions required for $k$ ones and $n - 1$ addition signs will be filled with addition signs or, equivalently, which $k$ of the $k + n - 1$ positions will be filled with ones.



              We wish to solve equation 1 in the nonnegative integers not larger than $m$ when $m + 1 leq k leq 2m + 1$. Thus, we must subtract those solutions in which a variable exceeds $m$. At most one variable may exceed $m$ since $2(m + 1) = 2m + 2 > 2m + 1$.



              We may choose a variable that exceeds $m$ in $n$ ways. Suppose that variable is $x_1$. Then $x_1' = x_1 - (m + 1)$ is a nonnegative integer. Substituting $x_1' + m + 1$ into equation 1 equation yields
              beginalign*
              x_1' + m + 1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k\
              x_1' + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k - (m + 1) tag2
              endalign*

              Equation 2 is an equation in the nonnegative integers with
              $$binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1n - 1 = binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
              solutions. Hence, there are
              $$binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1n - 1 = binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
              solutions in which one of the variables exceeds $m$.



              Thus, there are
              $$binomk + n - 1k - binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
              admissible solutions.



              Notice that in equation 2, $m + 1 leq x_1 leq 2m + 1 implies 0 leq x_1' leq m$. It does not imply that $x_1 = m + 1$.



              Let's compare this with what would happen if $x_1 = m + 1$. Then we would have
              beginalign*
              m + 1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k\
              x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k - (m + 1)
              endalign*

              which is an equation in the nonnegative integers with
              $$binomk - (m + 1) + (n - 1) - 1(n - 1) - 1 = binomk - (m + 1) + (n - 1) - 1k - (m + 1)$$
              solutions, which is a smaller number as we would expect.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                A solution of the equation in the nonnegative integers
                $$x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n = k tag1$$
                corresponds to the placement of $n - 1$ addition signs in a row of $k$ ones. For instance, if $n = 4$ and $k = 10$,
                $$1 1 + + 1 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 1$$
                corresponds to the solution $x_1 = 2$, $x_2 = 0$, $x_3 = 5$, $x_4 = 3$. The number of such solutions is
                $$binomk + n - 1n - 1 = binomk + n - 1k$$
                since we must choose which $n - 1$ of the $k + n - 1$ positions required for $k$ ones and $n - 1$ addition signs will be filled with addition signs or, equivalently, which $k$ of the $k + n - 1$ positions will be filled with ones.



                We wish to solve equation 1 in the nonnegative integers not larger than $m$ when $m + 1 leq k leq 2m + 1$. Thus, we must subtract those solutions in which a variable exceeds $m$. At most one variable may exceed $m$ since $2(m + 1) = 2m + 2 > 2m + 1$.



                We may choose a variable that exceeds $m$ in $n$ ways. Suppose that variable is $x_1$. Then $x_1' = x_1 - (m + 1)$ is a nonnegative integer. Substituting $x_1' + m + 1$ into equation 1 equation yields
                beginalign*
                x_1' + m + 1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k\
                x_1' + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k - (m + 1) tag2
                endalign*

                Equation 2 is an equation in the nonnegative integers with
                $$binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1n - 1 = binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
                solutions. Hence, there are
                $$binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1n - 1 = binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
                solutions in which one of the variables exceeds $m$.



                Thus, there are
                $$binomk + n - 1k - binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
                admissible solutions.



                Notice that in equation 2, $m + 1 leq x_1 leq 2m + 1 implies 0 leq x_1' leq m$. It does not imply that $x_1 = m + 1$.



                Let's compare this with what would happen if $x_1 = m + 1$. Then we would have
                beginalign*
                m + 1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k\
                x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k - (m + 1)
                endalign*

                which is an equation in the nonnegative integers with
                $$binomk - (m + 1) + (n - 1) - 1(n - 1) - 1 = binomk - (m + 1) + (n - 1) - 1k - (m + 1)$$
                solutions, which is a smaller number as we would expect.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                A solution of the equation in the nonnegative integers
                $$x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n = k tag1$$
                corresponds to the placement of $n - 1$ addition signs in a row of $k$ ones. For instance, if $n = 4$ and $k = 10$,
                $$1 1 + + 1 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 1$$
                corresponds to the solution $x_1 = 2$, $x_2 = 0$, $x_3 = 5$, $x_4 = 3$. The number of such solutions is
                $$binomk + n - 1n - 1 = binomk + n - 1k$$
                since we must choose which $n - 1$ of the $k + n - 1$ positions required for $k$ ones and $n - 1$ addition signs will be filled with addition signs or, equivalently, which $k$ of the $k + n - 1$ positions will be filled with ones.



                We wish to solve equation 1 in the nonnegative integers not larger than $m$ when $m + 1 leq k leq 2m + 1$. Thus, we must subtract those solutions in which a variable exceeds $m$. At most one variable may exceed $m$ since $2(m + 1) = 2m + 2 > 2m + 1$.



                We may choose a variable that exceeds $m$ in $n$ ways. Suppose that variable is $x_1$. Then $x_1' = x_1 - (m + 1)$ is a nonnegative integer. Substituting $x_1' + m + 1$ into equation 1 equation yields
                beginalign*
                x_1' + m + 1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k\
                x_1' + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k - (m + 1) tag2
                endalign*

                Equation 2 is an equation in the nonnegative integers with
                $$binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1n - 1 = binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
                solutions. Hence, there are
                $$binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1n - 1 = binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
                solutions in which one of the variables exceeds $m$.



                Thus, there are
                $$binomk + n - 1k - binomn1binomk - (m + 1) + n - 1k - (m + 1)$$
                admissible solutions.



                Notice that in equation 2, $m + 1 leq x_1 leq 2m + 1 implies 0 leq x_1' leq m$. It does not imply that $x_1 = m + 1$.



                Let's compare this with what would happen if $x_1 = m + 1$. Then we would have
                beginalign*
                m + 1 + x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k\
                x_2 + ldots + x_n & = k - (m + 1)
                endalign*

                which is an equation in the nonnegative integers with
                $$binomk - (m + 1) + (n - 1) - 1(n - 1) - 1 = binomk - (m + 1) + (n - 1) - 1k - (m + 1)$$
                solutions, which is a smaller number as we would expect.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Mar 30 at 11:06

























                answered Mar 29 at 15:44









                N. F. TaussigN. F. Taussig

                45k103358




                45k103358



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167115%2fnumber-of-solutions-to-the-equation-x-1-x-2-ldots-x-n-k-when-0-leq%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                    Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                    Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire