In a finite field, number of squares not contained in smaller subfield.Show the norm map is surjectiveFind the number of non-zero squares in the field $Zp$Understanding examples of subfield and prime subfield of a finite fieldEmbed finite field in algebraic closed fieldPrimitive element of finite fieldComputing Galois group of polynomial over finite fieldQuestion on Squares in Finite FieldsAffine subspace of finite field intersecting prime subfieldHow many squares in $C_i$ over finite fieldsdistribution of squares in a finite fieldCountable ordered subfield of any Ordered Field
Test whether all array elements are factors of a number
How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?
To string or not to string
Theorems that impeded progress
Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?
What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?
Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digits
Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation
How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Modeling an IPv4 Address
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
How do I create uniquely male characters?
Problem of parity - Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments...
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?
can i play a electric guitar through a bass amp?
Font hinting is lost in Chrome-like browsers (for some languages )
Python: next in for loop
How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?
What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?
Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?
In a finite field, number of squares not contained in smaller subfield.
Show the norm map is surjectiveFind the number of non-zero squares in the field $Zp$Understanding examples of subfield and prime subfield of a finite fieldEmbed finite field in algebraic closed fieldPrimitive element of finite fieldComputing Galois group of polynomial over finite fieldQuestion on Squares in Finite FieldsAffine subspace of finite field intersecting prime subfieldHow many squares in $C_i$ over finite fieldsdistribution of squares in a finite fieldCountable ordered subfield of any Ordered Field
$begingroup$
Let $mathbbF_q$ be the finite field of order $q$, where $q$ is odd. Now, Let $S$ be the set of elements $x$ in $mathbbF_q^n^*$, such that $x$ doesnot belong to any smaller subfield(containing $mathbbF_q$) of $mathbbF_q^n$. Let $S^2= x^2 $. I want to find out $|Scap S^2|$.
I have made some calculations and found out the answer, but I am not sure whether it is perfectly correct, or whether there is easier way to see this!
Here is my idea: $|S|=sum_nmu(d)q^n/d$. Here $mu$ denotes the Mobius Function. Now I divide this in two case.
Case 1: Suppose $n$ is odd.
Then observe that $ain S implies a^2in S$. This is because there is no intermediate extension of even order. Now, since exactly two element of $S$ gives the same squared element, we have $|Scap S^2|=frac2= frac12sum_nmu(d)q^n/d$.
Case 2: Suppose $n$ is even
In this case: $ain S implies texteither a^2in S text or a^2in mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. Now, there are exactly $fracq^n/2-12$ non-squares in $mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. These non-squares are squares of elements in $S$. So, in this way there are $q^n/2-1$ elements in $S$, whose squares lie in $mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. Hence there are $|S|- (q^n/2-1)$ number of elements in $S$ whose squares are in $S$. Hence $|Scap S^2|=frac12[|S|-(q^n/2-1)]= frac12Big[sum_nmu(d)q^n/d - (q^n/2-1)Big]$.
This completes the solution. Please let me know whether this is a fine solution, or am I missing something! Let me know, if one can approach this problem any easier way.
Thank you!
abstract-algebra combinatorics field-theory galois-theory finite-fields
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $mathbbF_q$ be the finite field of order $q$, where $q$ is odd. Now, Let $S$ be the set of elements $x$ in $mathbbF_q^n^*$, such that $x$ doesnot belong to any smaller subfield(containing $mathbbF_q$) of $mathbbF_q^n$. Let $S^2= x^2 $. I want to find out $|Scap S^2|$.
I have made some calculations and found out the answer, but I am not sure whether it is perfectly correct, or whether there is easier way to see this!
Here is my idea: $|S|=sum_nmu(d)q^n/d$. Here $mu$ denotes the Mobius Function. Now I divide this in two case.
Case 1: Suppose $n$ is odd.
Then observe that $ain S implies a^2in S$. This is because there is no intermediate extension of even order. Now, since exactly two element of $S$ gives the same squared element, we have $|Scap S^2|=frac2= frac12sum_nmu(d)q^n/d$.
Case 2: Suppose $n$ is even
In this case: $ain S implies texteither a^2in S text or a^2in mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. Now, there are exactly $fracq^n/2-12$ non-squares in $mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. These non-squares are squares of elements in $S$. So, in this way there are $q^n/2-1$ elements in $S$, whose squares lie in $mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. Hence there are $|S|- (q^n/2-1)$ number of elements in $S$ whose squares are in $S$. Hence $|Scap S^2|=frac12[|S|-(q^n/2-1)]= frac12Big[sum_nmu(d)q^n/d - (q^n/2-1)Big]$.
This completes the solution. Please let me know whether this is a fine solution, or am I missing something! Let me know, if one can approach this problem any easier way.
Thank you!
abstract-algebra combinatorics field-theory galois-theory finite-fields
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
When you say "smaller subfield", do you mean "smaller field extension of $mathbbF_q$" or literally "smaller subfield"? Because that makes a difference.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 27 at 17:57
$begingroup$
no literally smaller subfield!! Will smaller subfield extension make sense in the question? Because not all finite fields are contained in $mathbbF_q^n$. $mathbbF_q^d$ is contained in $mathbbF_q^n$ iff $dmid n$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 6:34
1
$begingroup$
If you mean literally "smaller subfield", then your computation of $left|Sright|$ doesn't work already (because your Möbius inversion only accounts for the subfields that contain $mathbbF_q$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 28 at 6:53
$begingroup$
Ok I know sww what you are saying! I am taking subfields containing $mathbbF_q$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 7:21
2
$begingroup$
Care to edit your question to correct it?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 29 at 3:51
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $mathbbF_q$ be the finite field of order $q$, where $q$ is odd. Now, Let $S$ be the set of elements $x$ in $mathbbF_q^n^*$, such that $x$ doesnot belong to any smaller subfield(containing $mathbbF_q$) of $mathbbF_q^n$. Let $S^2= x^2 $. I want to find out $|Scap S^2|$.
I have made some calculations and found out the answer, but I am not sure whether it is perfectly correct, or whether there is easier way to see this!
Here is my idea: $|S|=sum_nmu(d)q^n/d$. Here $mu$ denotes the Mobius Function. Now I divide this in two case.
Case 1: Suppose $n$ is odd.
Then observe that $ain S implies a^2in S$. This is because there is no intermediate extension of even order. Now, since exactly two element of $S$ gives the same squared element, we have $|Scap S^2|=frac2= frac12sum_nmu(d)q^n/d$.
Case 2: Suppose $n$ is even
In this case: $ain S implies texteither a^2in S text or a^2in mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. Now, there are exactly $fracq^n/2-12$ non-squares in $mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. These non-squares are squares of elements in $S$. So, in this way there are $q^n/2-1$ elements in $S$, whose squares lie in $mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. Hence there are $|S|- (q^n/2-1)$ number of elements in $S$ whose squares are in $S$. Hence $|Scap S^2|=frac12[|S|-(q^n/2-1)]= frac12Big[sum_nmu(d)q^n/d - (q^n/2-1)Big]$.
This completes the solution. Please let me know whether this is a fine solution, or am I missing something! Let me know, if one can approach this problem any easier way.
Thank you!
abstract-algebra combinatorics field-theory galois-theory finite-fields
$endgroup$
Let $mathbbF_q$ be the finite field of order $q$, where $q$ is odd. Now, Let $S$ be the set of elements $x$ in $mathbbF_q^n^*$, such that $x$ doesnot belong to any smaller subfield(containing $mathbbF_q$) of $mathbbF_q^n$. Let $S^2= x^2 $. I want to find out $|Scap S^2|$.
I have made some calculations and found out the answer, but I am not sure whether it is perfectly correct, or whether there is easier way to see this!
Here is my idea: $|S|=sum_nmu(d)q^n/d$. Here $mu$ denotes the Mobius Function. Now I divide this in two case.
Case 1: Suppose $n$ is odd.
Then observe that $ain S implies a^2in S$. This is because there is no intermediate extension of even order. Now, since exactly two element of $S$ gives the same squared element, we have $|Scap S^2|=frac2= frac12sum_nmu(d)q^n/d$.
Case 2: Suppose $n$ is even
In this case: $ain S implies texteither a^2in S text or a^2in mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. Now, there are exactly $fracq^n/2-12$ non-squares in $mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. These non-squares are squares of elements in $S$. So, in this way there are $q^n/2-1$ elements in $S$, whose squares lie in $mathbbF_q^n/2^*$. Hence there are $|S|- (q^n/2-1)$ number of elements in $S$ whose squares are in $S$. Hence $|Scap S^2|=frac12[|S|-(q^n/2-1)]= frac12Big[sum_nmu(d)q^n/d - (q^n/2-1)Big]$.
This completes the solution. Please let me know whether this is a fine solution, or am I missing something! Let me know, if one can approach this problem any easier way.
Thank you!
abstract-algebra combinatorics field-theory galois-theory finite-fields
abstract-algebra combinatorics field-theory galois-theory finite-fields
edited Mar 29 at 15:38
hardmath
29.3k953101
29.3k953101
asked Mar 26 at 14:51
RijuRiju
2,294414
2,294414
2
$begingroup$
When you say "smaller subfield", do you mean "smaller field extension of $mathbbF_q$" or literally "smaller subfield"? Because that makes a difference.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 27 at 17:57
$begingroup$
no literally smaller subfield!! Will smaller subfield extension make sense in the question? Because not all finite fields are contained in $mathbbF_q^n$. $mathbbF_q^d$ is contained in $mathbbF_q^n$ iff $dmid n$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 6:34
1
$begingroup$
If you mean literally "smaller subfield", then your computation of $left|Sright|$ doesn't work already (because your Möbius inversion only accounts for the subfields that contain $mathbbF_q$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 28 at 6:53
$begingroup$
Ok I know sww what you are saying! I am taking subfields containing $mathbbF_q$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 7:21
2
$begingroup$
Care to edit your question to correct it?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 29 at 3:51
|
show 3 more comments
2
$begingroup$
When you say "smaller subfield", do you mean "smaller field extension of $mathbbF_q$" or literally "smaller subfield"? Because that makes a difference.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 27 at 17:57
$begingroup$
no literally smaller subfield!! Will smaller subfield extension make sense in the question? Because not all finite fields are contained in $mathbbF_q^n$. $mathbbF_q^d$ is contained in $mathbbF_q^n$ iff $dmid n$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 6:34
1
$begingroup$
If you mean literally "smaller subfield", then your computation of $left|Sright|$ doesn't work already (because your Möbius inversion only accounts for the subfields that contain $mathbbF_q$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 28 at 6:53
$begingroup$
Ok I know sww what you are saying! I am taking subfields containing $mathbbF_q$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 7:21
2
$begingroup$
Care to edit your question to correct it?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 29 at 3:51
2
2
$begingroup$
When you say "smaller subfield", do you mean "smaller field extension of $mathbbF_q$" or literally "smaller subfield"? Because that makes a difference.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 27 at 17:57
$begingroup$
When you say "smaller subfield", do you mean "smaller field extension of $mathbbF_q$" or literally "smaller subfield"? Because that makes a difference.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 27 at 17:57
$begingroup$
no literally smaller subfield!! Will smaller subfield extension make sense in the question? Because not all finite fields are contained in $mathbbF_q^n$. $mathbbF_q^d$ is contained in $mathbbF_q^n$ iff $dmid n$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 6:34
$begingroup$
no literally smaller subfield!! Will smaller subfield extension make sense in the question? Because not all finite fields are contained in $mathbbF_q^n$. $mathbbF_q^d$ is contained in $mathbbF_q^n$ iff $dmid n$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 6:34
1
1
$begingroup$
If you mean literally "smaller subfield", then your computation of $left|Sright|$ doesn't work already (because your Möbius inversion only accounts for the subfields that contain $mathbbF_q$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 28 at 6:53
$begingroup$
If you mean literally "smaller subfield", then your computation of $left|Sright|$ doesn't work already (because your Möbius inversion only accounts for the subfields that contain $mathbbF_q$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 28 at 6:53
$begingroup$
Ok I know sww what you are saying! I am taking subfields containing $mathbbF_q$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 7:21
$begingroup$
Ok I know sww what you are saying! I am taking subfields containing $mathbbF_q$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 7:21
2
2
$begingroup$
Care to edit your question to correct it?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 29 at 3:51
$begingroup$
Care to edit your question to correct it?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 29 at 3:51
|
show 3 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163283%2fin-a-finite-field-number-of-squares-not-contained-in-smaller-subfield%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163283%2fin-a-finite-field-number-of-squares-not-contained-in-smaller-subfield%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
When you say "smaller subfield", do you mean "smaller field extension of $mathbbF_q$" or literally "smaller subfield"? Because that makes a difference.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 27 at 17:57
$begingroup$
no literally smaller subfield!! Will smaller subfield extension make sense in the question? Because not all finite fields are contained in $mathbbF_q^n$. $mathbbF_q^d$ is contained in $mathbbF_q^n$ iff $dmid n$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 6:34
1
$begingroup$
If you mean literally "smaller subfield", then your computation of $left|Sright|$ doesn't work already (because your Möbius inversion only accounts for the subfields that contain $mathbbF_q$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 28 at 6:53
$begingroup$
Ok I know sww what you are saying! I am taking subfields containing $mathbbF_q$.
$endgroup$
– Riju
Mar 28 at 7:21
2
$begingroup$
Care to edit your question to correct it?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 29 at 3:51