Is there a calculus attempt at this question:Given a continuous charge distribution of a sphere calculate the electric field away:Why $ intrhodV = frac1c intj^0dV = frac1c intj^idS_i $?Finding a scalar field whose gradient is a given conservative vector fieldFormally evaluating integral to calculate electric or gravitational field.Continuity of the divergence of a static electric fieldElectric field lines between surfaces of hollow spherePotential of a charged sphere.Proportionality, integrationHow to do this problem without using infinitesimal?Gauss's law in infinite spaceGiven a continuous charge distribution of a sphere calculate the electric field away:

Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?

Today is the Center

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

How does strength of boric acid solution increase in presence of salicylic acid?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

Mage Armor with Defense fighting style (for Adventurers League bladeslinger)

Minkowski space

Do VLANs within a subnet need to have their own subnet for router on a stick?

How to write a macro that is braces sensitive?

What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

How to find program name(s) of an installed package?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

Test if tikzmark exists on same page

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

How could an uplifted falcon's brain work?

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Problem of parity - Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments...



Is there a calculus attempt at this question:


Given a continuous charge distribution of a sphere calculate the electric field away:Why $ intrhodV = frac1c intj^0dV = frac1c intj^idS_i $?Finding a scalar field whose gradient is a given conservative vector fieldFormally evaluating integral to calculate electric or gravitational field.Continuity of the divergence of a static electric fieldElectric field lines between surfaces of hollow spherePotential of a charged sphere.Proportionality, integrationHow to do this problem without using infinitesimal?Gauss's law in infinite spaceGiven a continuous charge distribution of a sphere calculate the electric field away:













0












$begingroup$


This question is based on the electric field.
This is the question which I would like to solve using this integral:
This is the equation for Electric Field.
$$E=int fracdqr^s$$
I was wondering if this approach was valid?



This is volume charge density and an exression can developed that states:




$$dq=rho dV$$
$$dq = rho 4pi r^2 dr$$
$$rho = fracq_inV_in=fracQ_totalV_total$$




Which leads me to say then that:



$$fracq_infrac43pi a^3cdotfrac43 pi r^3=Q$$
Then when I take the derivative of both sides I get:



$$frac3q_inr^2a^3dr=dQ$$



$$kint frac3q_inr^2r^2a^3dr$$
$$E=3kfracq_ina^3r$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    And explanation of the physics and symbols would greatly enable focused answers.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    Mar 29 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    @avs Did you read the last question?
    $endgroup$
    – EnlightenedFunky
    Mar 29 at 15:53










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, don't have time to follow links or look into sources. (Didn't even notice your link.)
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    Mar 29 at 16:17










  • $begingroup$
    Questions should be self-contained. It is alright to reference another question to give more background, but you should reproduce enough here to allow people to understand your question without having to follow the link. However, you've added several symbols to your calculation that are not defined here, nor are they defined in the other question. So we have to guess what it is you mean. Sorry, not interested in guessing.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 30 at 1:08










  • $begingroup$
    Do the dimensions agree?
    $endgroup$
    – marty cohen
    Mar 30 at 15:52
















0












$begingroup$


This question is based on the electric field.
This is the question which I would like to solve using this integral:
This is the equation for Electric Field.
$$E=int fracdqr^s$$
I was wondering if this approach was valid?



This is volume charge density and an exression can developed that states:




$$dq=rho dV$$
$$dq = rho 4pi r^2 dr$$
$$rho = fracq_inV_in=fracQ_totalV_total$$




Which leads me to say then that:



$$fracq_infrac43pi a^3cdotfrac43 pi r^3=Q$$
Then when I take the derivative of both sides I get:



$$frac3q_inr^2a^3dr=dQ$$



$$kint frac3q_inr^2r^2a^3dr$$
$$E=3kfracq_ina^3r$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    And explanation of the physics and symbols would greatly enable focused answers.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    Mar 29 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    @avs Did you read the last question?
    $endgroup$
    – EnlightenedFunky
    Mar 29 at 15:53










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, don't have time to follow links or look into sources. (Didn't even notice your link.)
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    Mar 29 at 16:17










  • $begingroup$
    Questions should be self-contained. It is alright to reference another question to give more background, but you should reproduce enough here to allow people to understand your question without having to follow the link. However, you've added several symbols to your calculation that are not defined here, nor are they defined in the other question. So we have to guess what it is you mean. Sorry, not interested in guessing.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 30 at 1:08










  • $begingroup$
    Do the dimensions agree?
    $endgroup$
    – marty cohen
    Mar 30 at 15:52














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


This question is based on the electric field.
This is the question which I would like to solve using this integral:
This is the equation for Electric Field.
$$E=int fracdqr^s$$
I was wondering if this approach was valid?



This is volume charge density and an exression can developed that states:




$$dq=rho dV$$
$$dq = rho 4pi r^2 dr$$
$$rho = fracq_inV_in=fracQ_totalV_total$$




Which leads me to say then that:



$$fracq_infrac43pi a^3cdotfrac43 pi r^3=Q$$
Then when I take the derivative of both sides I get:



$$frac3q_inr^2a^3dr=dQ$$



$$kint frac3q_inr^2r^2a^3dr$$
$$E=3kfracq_ina^3r$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This question is based on the electric field.
This is the question which I would like to solve using this integral:
This is the equation for Electric Field.
$$E=int fracdqr^s$$
I was wondering if this approach was valid?



This is volume charge density and an exression can developed that states:




$$dq=rho dV$$
$$dq = rho 4pi r^2 dr$$
$$rho = fracq_inV_in=fracQ_totalV_total$$




Which leads me to say then that:



$$fracq_infrac43pi a^3cdotfrac43 pi r^3=Q$$
Then when I take the derivative of both sides I get:



$$frac3q_inr^2a^3dr=dQ$$



$$kint frac3q_inr^2r^2a^3dr$$
$$E=3kfracq_ina^3r$$







integration physics indefinite-integrals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 30 at 15:42







EnlightenedFunky

















asked Mar 29 at 15:40









EnlightenedFunkyEnlightenedFunky

84211022




84211022











  • $begingroup$
    And explanation of the physics and symbols would greatly enable focused answers.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    Mar 29 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    @avs Did you read the last question?
    $endgroup$
    – EnlightenedFunky
    Mar 29 at 15:53










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, don't have time to follow links or look into sources. (Didn't even notice your link.)
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    Mar 29 at 16:17










  • $begingroup$
    Questions should be self-contained. It is alright to reference another question to give more background, but you should reproduce enough here to allow people to understand your question without having to follow the link. However, you've added several symbols to your calculation that are not defined here, nor are they defined in the other question. So we have to guess what it is you mean. Sorry, not interested in guessing.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 30 at 1:08










  • $begingroup$
    Do the dimensions agree?
    $endgroup$
    – marty cohen
    Mar 30 at 15:52

















  • $begingroup$
    And explanation of the physics and symbols would greatly enable focused answers.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    Mar 29 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    @avs Did you read the last question?
    $endgroup$
    – EnlightenedFunky
    Mar 29 at 15:53










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, don't have time to follow links or look into sources. (Didn't even notice your link.)
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    Mar 29 at 16:17










  • $begingroup$
    Questions should be self-contained. It is alright to reference another question to give more background, but you should reproduce enough here to allow people to understand your question without having to follow the link. However, you've added several symbols to your calculation that are not defined here, nor are they defined in the other question. So we have to guess what it is you mean. Sorry, not interested in guessing.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 30 at 1:08










  • $begingroup$
    Do the dimensions agree?
    $endgroup$
    – marty cohen
    Mar 30 at 15:52
















$begingroup$
And explanation of the physics and symbols would greatly enable focused answers.
$endgroup$
– avs
Mar 29 at 15:43




$begingroup$
And explanation of the physics and symbols would greatly enable focused answers.
$endgroup$
– avs
Mar 29 at 15:43












$begingroup$
@avs Did you read the last question?
$endgroup$
– EnlightenedFunky
Mar 29 at 15:53




$begingroup$
@avs Did you read the last question?
$endgroup$
– EnlightenedFunky
Mar 29 at 15:53












$begingroup$
Sorry, don't have time to follow links or look into sources. (Didn't even notice your link.)
$endgroup$
– avs
Mar 29 at 16:17




$begingroup$
Sorry, don't have time to follow links or look into sources. (Didn't even notice your link.)
$endgroup$
– avs
Mar 29 at 16:17












$begingroup$
Questions should be self-contained. It is alright to reference another question to give more background, but you should reproduce enough here to allow people to understand your question without having to follow the link. However, you've added several symbols to your calculation that are not defined here, nor are they defined in the other question. So we have to guess what it is you mean. Sorry, not interested in guessing.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 30 at 1:08




$begingroup$
Questions should be self-contained. It is alright to reference another question to give more background, but you should reproduce enough here to allow people to understand your question without having to follow the link. However, you've added several symbols to your calculation that are not defined here, nor are they defined in the other question. So we have to guess what it is you mean. Sorry, not interested in guessing.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 30 at 1:08












$begingroup$
Do the dimensions agree?
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
Mar 30 at 15:52





$begingroup$
Do the dimensions agree?
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
Mar 30 at 15:52











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The formula next to last is not correct. Let's say that the original sphere has radius $a$, and we want to calculate the electric field at some distance $R$ from the center. A spherical shell that you use for integration has a radius $r$, with $0le rle R$. The electric field due to this shell is $fracdQR^2$, and not $fracdQr^2$ as you have used in your calculations. Then, you get $$E=kint_0^RfracdQ(r)R^2=kfrac 1R^2q_in=kfracQR^2fracR^3a^3=frackQRa^3$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167271%2fis-there-a-calculus-attempt-at-this-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The formula next to last is not correct. Let's say that the original sphere has radius $a$, and we want to calculate the electric field at some distance $R$ from the center. A spherical shell that you use for integration has a radius $r$, with $0le rle R$. The electric field due to this shell is $fracdQR^2$, and not $fracdQr^2$ as you have used in your calculations. Then, you get $$E=kint_0^RfracdQ(r)R^2=kfrac 1R^2q_in=kfracQR^2fracR^3a^3=frackQRa^3$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      The formula next to last is not correct. Let's say that the original sphere has radius $a$, and we want to calculate the electric field at some distance $R$ from the center. A spherical shell that you use for integration has a radius $r$, with $0le rle R$. The electric field due to this shell is $fracdQR^2$, and not $fracdQr^2$ as you have used in your calculations. Then, you get $$E=kint_0^RfracdQ(r)R^2=kfrac 1R^2q_in=kfracQR^2fracR^3a^3=frackQRa^3$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The formula next to last is not correct. Let's say that the original sphere has radius $a$, and we want to calculate the electric field at some distance $R$ from the center. A spherical shell that you use for integration has a radius $r$, with $0le rle R$. The electric field due to this shell is $fracdQR^2$, and not $fracdQr^2$ as you have used in your calculations. Then, you get $$E=kint_0^RfracdQ(r)R^2=kfrac 1R^2q_in=kfracQR^2fracR^3a^3=frackQRa^3$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The formula next to last is not correct. Let's say that the original sphere has radius $a$, and we want to calculate the electric field at some distance $R$ from the center. A spherical shell that you use for integration has a radius $r$, with $0le rle R$. The electric field due to this shell is $fracdQR^2$, and not $fracdQr^2$ as you have used in your calculations. Then, you get $$E=kint_0^RfracdQ(r)R^2=kfrac 1R^2q_in=kfracQR^2fracR^3a^3=frackQRa^3$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 1 at 18:17









        AndreiAndrei

        13.5k21230




        13.5k21230



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167271%2fis-there-a-calculus-attempt-at-this-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

            Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

            Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire