Prove $f(x) = x^2$ is Riemann integrable The Next CEO of Stack OverflowRiemann Sum of $int_-1^1|x| dx$Lebesgue integrable and improper Riemann integrableProving a piecewise function is Riemann integrableRiemann integrable function propertyintegrable riemann functionshow that this function is not Riemann integrable on $[0,1].$Exercise: Prove inequality using Riemann lower sum and integralThomae function is Riemann integrableShow step functions are Riemann integrableProve that this function is Riemann Integrable on $[0,1]$
MAZDA 3 2006 (UK) - poor acceleration then takes off at 3250 revs
Why doesn't a table tennis ball float on the surface? How do we calculate buoyancy here?
Natural language into sentence logic
What do "high sea" and "carry" mean in this sentence?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Too much space between section and text in a twocolumn document
Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves
Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?
How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users
Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?
Why were Madagascar and New Zealand discovered so late?
Apart from "berlinern", do any other German dialects have a corresponding verb?
Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords
Go Pregnant or Go Home
When airplanes disconnect from a tanker during air to air refueling, why do they bank so sharply to the right?
The King's new dress
Where to find order of arguments for default functions
If I blow insulation everywhere in my attic except the door trap, will heat escape through it?
Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"
How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?
Is it okay to store user locations?
Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!
Prove $f(x) = x^2$ is Riemann integrable
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowRiemann Sum of $int_-1^1|x| dx$Lebesgue integrable and improper Riemann integrableProving a piecewise function is Riemann integrableRiemann integrable function propertyintegrable riemann functionshow that this function is not Riemann integrable on $[0,1].$Exercise: Prove inequality using Riemann lower sum and integralThomae function is Riemann integrableShow step functions are Riemann integrableProve that this function is Riemann Integrable on $[0,1]$
$begingroup$
Let $f:[a,b] to mathbb R$ with $f(x) = x^2$, show $int_a^bf(x)dx = frac13(b^3-a^3)$
Here is my trial:
Let $X =(x_0,dots,x_n)$ be a partition on $[a,b]$, let $t_i in [x_i-1,x_i], i=1,dots,n$
Then $|sum_i=1^nf(t_i)triangle_ix - frac13(b^3-a^3)| = |sum_1^nt_i^2triangle_ix - frac13sum_1^nx_i^3-x_i-1^3| \
= |sum_i=1^n[t_i^2 - frac13(x_i^2 + x_ix_i-1 + x_i-1^2)] triangle_ix|$
But now I got stuck... can someone help me out?
real-analysis riemann-integration
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:[a,b] to mathbb R$ with $f(x) = x^2$, show $int_a^bf(x)dx = frac13(b^3-a^3)$
Here is my trial:
Let $X =(x_0,dots,x_n)$ be a partition on $[a,b]$, let $t_i in [x_i-1,x_i], i=1,dots,n$
Then $|sum_i=1^nf(t_i)triangle_ix - frac13(b^3-a^3)| = |sum_1^nt_i^2triangle_ix - frac13sum_1^nx_i^3-x_i-1^3| \
= |sum_i=1^n[t_i^2 - frac13(x_i^2 + x_ix_i-1 + x_i-1^2)] triangle_ix|$
But now I got stuck... can someone help me out?
real-analysis riemann-integration
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
$endgroup$
– M. Boyet
Mar 15 '17 at 22:44
$begingroup$
@M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 15 '17 at 23:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:[a,b] to mathbb R$ with $f(x) = x^2$, show $int_a^bf(x)dx = frac13(b^3-a^3)$
Here is my trial:
Let $X =(x_0,dots,x_n)$ be a partition on $[a,b]$, let $t_i in [x_i-1,x_i], i=1,dots,n$
Then $|sum_i=1^nf(t_i)triangle_ix - frac13(b^3-a^3)| = |sum_1^nt_i^2triangle_ix - frac13sum_1^nx_i^3-x_i-1^3| \
= |sum_i=1^n[t_i^2 - frac13(x_i^2 + x_ix_i-1 + x_i-1^2)] triangle_ix|$
But now I got stuck... can someone help me out?
real-analysis riemann-integration
$endgroup$
Let $f:[a,b] to mathbb R$ with $f(x) = x^2$, show $int_a^bf(x)dx = frac13(b^3-a^3)$
Here is my trial:
Let $X =(x_0,dots,x_n)$ be a partition on $[a,b]$, let $t_i in [x_i-1,x_i], i=1,dots,n$
Then $|sum_i=1^nf(t_i)triangle_ix - frac13(b^3-a^3)| = |sum_1^nt_i^2triangle_ix - frac13sum_1^nx_i^3-x_i-1^3| \
= |sum_i=1^n[t_i^2 - frac13(x_i^2 + x_ix_i-1 + x_i-1^2)] triangle_ix|$
But now I got stuck... can someone help me out?
real-analysis riemann-integration
real-analysis riemann-integration
edited Mar 15 '17 at 22:46
Jack D'Aurizio
292k33284672
292k33284672
asked Mar 15 '17 at 22:39
user370220
1
$begingroup$
A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
$endgroup$
– M. Boyet
Mar 15 '17 at 22:44
$begingroup$
@M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 15 '17 at 23:13
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
$endgroup$
– M. Boyet
Mar 15 '17 at 22:44
$begingroup$
@M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 15 '17 at 23:13
1
1
$begingroup$
A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
$endgroup$
– M. Boyet
Mar 15 '17 at 22:44
$begingroup$
A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
$endgroup$
– M. Boyet
Mar 15 '17 at 22:44
$begingroup$
@M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 15 '17 at 23:13
$begingroup$
@M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 15 '17 at 23:13
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I guess this answer has been given many times, but I am too lazy to find a reference, I prefer to write it again. It is useful to prove first that
$$ sum_k=1^n k^2 = fracn(n+1)(2n+1)6tag1 $$
holds. That can be done in many ways, for instance by induction or by the hockey-stick identity:
$$ sum_k=1^nk^2 = sum_k=1^nleft[2binomk2+binomk1right] = 2binomn+13+binomn+12.tag2$$
For the function $f(x)=x^2$ over the interval $(0,1)$, the upper and lower Riemann sums for uniform partitions are given in terms of
$$ frac1Nsum_k=1^Nleft(frackNright)^2,qquad frac1Nsum_k=0^N-1left(frackNright)^2 tag3 $$
and the limit of both, as $Nto +infty$, equals $frac13$ by $(1)$. At last,
$$ int_a^bx^2,dx = int_0^bx^2,dx - int_0^ax^2,dx = (b^3-a^3)int_0^1x^2,dxtag4 $$
proves the claim.
Addendum. With a geometric flavour (i.e. integrating along sections), $int_a^bx^2,dx$, if $0<a<b$, is just $frac1pi$ times the volume of a frustum of a cone with height $b-a$ and radii of the bases given by $a$ and $b$. The formula
$$ V = fracpi h3(R^2+Rr+r^2) $$
is known since the Babylonian period and can be easily proved through similarities, once we know that the volume of a cone (or pyramid) is $frac13hcdot A_textbase$. Through Cavalieri's principle and the property of linear maps of proserving ratios of volumes, the whole question boils down to finding the volume of a pyramid given by the convex envelope of a face of a cube and the center of the same cube. That trivially is $frac16V_textcube$ by symmetry.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 16 '17 at 0:00
$begingroup$
@ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Mar 16 '17 at 0:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$f(x) = x^2$ is continuous everywhere, and hence Riemann-integrable. QED.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:21
1
$begingroup$
I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
$endgroup$
– Hugh Mungus
Mar 15 '17 at 23:39
1
$begingroup$
Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume $0leq a<b$.(or $a<bleq 0)$ (For the case $a<0<b$, we may come up with the equation $int_[a,b] f = int_[a,0] f + int_[0,b] f $.)
Following the notation above, we may observe $x_i-1^2 < x_ix_i-1 < x_i^2$ for each $i=1,cdots,n$ so that $$x_i-1^2 < frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)< x_i^2$$
with $x_i-1^2 leq t_i^2 leq x_i^2$ obviously.( for $a<bleq0$, "$<$" would be "$>$")
Then, $$|t_i^2-frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)|<|x_i^2-x_i-1^2|=x_i^2-x_i-1^2$$($-x_i^2+x_i-1^2$ for $a<bleq0$ )
Consequently, if we take $d=d([a,b])$ as $maxDelta_1 x,cdots,Delta_n x$,
the last term you wrote can be bounded as follows.
$$left|sum_i=1^n left(t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right)Delta_i xright| leq sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right|Delta_i x $$
$$leq d sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right| leq d sum_i=1^n left| x_i^2 -x_i-1^2right| = d|b^2-a^2|$$
As a result, $sum_i=1^n f(t_i)Delta_i x rightarrow frac13(b^3-a^3)$ as
$drightarrow0$, regardless of the choice of $t_i$. (Rimann integrability ?)
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2188575%2fprove-fx-x2-is-riemann-integrable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I guess this answer has been given many times, but I am too lazy to find a reference, I prefer to write it again. It is useful to prove first that
$$ sum_k=1^n k^2 = fracn(n+1)(2n+1)6tag1 $$
holds. That can be done in many ways, for instance by induction or by the hockey-stick identity:
$$ sum_k=1^nk^2 = sum_k=1^nleft[2binomk2+binomk1right] = 2binomn+13+binomn+12.tag2$$
For the function $f(x)=x^2$ over the interval $(0,1)$, the upper and lower Riemann sums for uniform partitions are given in terms of
$$ frac1Nsum_k=1^Nleft(frackNright)^2,qquad frac1Nsum_k=0^N-1left(frackNright)^2 tag3 $$
and the limit of both, as $Nto +infty$, equals $frac13$ by $(1)$. At last,
$$ int_a^bx^2,dx = int_0^bx^2,dx - int_0^ax^2,dx = (b^3-a^3)int_0^1x^2,dxtag4 $$
proves the claim.
Addendum. With a geometric flavour (i.e. integrating along sections), $int_a^bx^2,dx$, if $0<a<b$, is just $frac1pi$ times the volume of a frustum of a cone with height $b-a$ and radii of the bases given by $a$ and $b$. The formula
$$ V = fracpi h3(R^2+Rr+r^2) $$
is known since the Babylonian period and can be easily proved through similarities, once we know that the volume of a cone (or pyramid) is $frac13hcdot A_textbase$. Through Cavalieri's principle and the property of linear maps of proserving ratios of volumes, the whole question boils down to finding the volume of a pyramid given by the convex envelope of a face of a cube and the center of the same cube. That trivially is $frac16V_textcube$ by symmetry.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 16 '17 at 0:00
$begingroup$
@ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Mar 16 '17 at 0:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I guess this answer has been given many times, but I am too lazy to find a reference, I prefer to write it again. It is useful to prove first that
$$ sum_k=1^n k^2 = fracn(n+1)(2n+1)6tag1 $$
holds. That can be done in many ways, for instance by induction or by the hockey-stick identity:
$$ sum_k=1^nk^2 = sum_k=1^nleft[2binomk2+binomk1right] = 2binomn+13+binomn+12.tag2$$
For the function $f(x)=x^2$ over the interval $(0,1)$, the upper and lower Riemann sums for uniform partitions are given in terms of
$$ frac1Nsum_k=1^Nleft(frackNright)^2,qquad frac1Nsum_k=0^N-1left(frackNright)^2 tag3 $$
and the limit of both, as $Nto +infty$, equals $frac13$ by $(1)$. At last,
$$ int_a^bx^2,dx = int_0^bx^2,dx - int_0^ax^2,dx = (b^3-a^3)int_0^1x^2,dxtag4 $$
proves the claim.
Addendum. With a geometric flavour (i.e. integrating along sections), $int_a^bx^2,dx$, if $0<a<b$, is just $frac1pi$ times the volume of a frustum of a cone with height $b-a$ and radii of the bases given by $a$ and $b$. The formula
$$ V = fracpi h3(R^2+Rr+r^2) $$
is known since the Babylonian period and can be easily proved through similarities, once we know that the volume of a cone (or pyramid) is $frac13hcdot A_textbase$. Through Cavalieri's principle and the property of linear maps of proserving ratios of volumes, the whole question boils down to finding the volume of a pyramid given by the convex envelope of a face of a cube and the center of the same cube. That trivially is $frac16V_textcube$ by symmetry.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 16 '17 at 0:00
$begingroup$
@ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Mar 16 '17 at 0:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I guess this answer has been given many times, but I am too lazy to find a reference, I prefer to write it again. It is useful to prove first that
$$ sum_k=1^n k^2 = fracn(n+1)(2n+1)6tag1 $$
holds. That can be done in many ways, for instance by induction or by the hockey-stick identity:
$$ sum_k=1^nk^2 = sum_k=1^nleft[2binomk2+binomk1right] = 2binomn+13+binomn+12.tag2$$
For the function $f(x)=x^2$ over the interval $(0,1)$, the upper and lower Riemann sums for uniform partitions are given in terms of
$$ frac1Nsum_k=1^Nleft(frackNright)^2,qquad frac1Nsum_k=0^N-1left(frackNright)^2 tag3 $$
and the limit of both, as $Nto +infty$, equals $frac13$ by $(1)$. At last,
$$ int_a^bx^2,dx = int_0^bx^2,dx - int_0^ax^2,dx = (b^3-a^3)int_0^1x^2,dxtag4 $$
proves the claim.
Addendum. With a geometric flavour (i.e. integrating along sections), $int_a^bx^2,dx$, if $0<a<b$, is just $frac1pi$ times the volume of a frustum of a cone with height $b-a$ and radii of the bases given by $a$ and $b$. The formula
$$ V = fracpi h3(R^2+Rr+r^2) $$
is known since the Babylonian period and can be easily proved through similarities, once we know that the volume of a cone (or pyramid) is $frac13hcdot A_textbase$. Through Cavalieri's principle and the property of linear maps of proserving ratios of volumes, the whole question boils down to finding the volume of a pyramid given by the convex envelope of a face of a cube and the center of the same cube. That trivially is $frac16V_textcube$ by symmetry.
$endgroup$
I guess this answer has been given many times, but I am too lazy to find a reference, I prefer to write it again. It is useful to prove first that
$$ sum_k=1^n k^2 = fracn(n+1)(2n+1)6tag1 $$
holds. That can be done in many ways, for instance by induction or by the hockey-stick identity:
$$ sum_k=1^nk^2 = sum_k=1^nleft[2binomk2+binomk1right] = 2binomn+13+binomn+12.tag2$$
For the function $f(x)=x^2$ over the interval $(0,1)$, the upper and lower Riemann sums for uniform partitions are given in terms of
$$ frac1Nsum_k=1^Nleft(frackNright)^2,qquad frac1Nsum_k=0^N-1left(frackNright)^2 tag3 $$
and the limit of both, as $Nto +infty$, equals $frac13$ by $(1)$. At last,
$$ int_a^bx^2,dx = int_0^bx^2,dx - int_0^ax^2,dx = (b^3-a^3)int_0^1x^2,dxtag4 $$
proves the claim.
Addendum. With a geometric flavour (i.e. integrating along sections), $int_a^bx^2,dx$, if $0<a<b$, is just $frac1pi$ times the volume of a frustum of a cone with height $b-a$ and radii of the bases given by $a$ and $b$. The formula
$$ V = fracpi h3(R^2+Rr+r^2) $$
is known since the Babylonian period and can be easily proved through similarities, once we know that the volume of a cone (or pyramid) is $frac13hcdot A_textbase$. Through Cavalieri's principle and the property of linear maps of proserving ratios of volumes, the whole question boils down to finding the volume of a pyramid given by the convex envelope of a face of a cube and the center of the same cube. That trivially is $frac16V_textcube$ by symmetry.
edited Mar 16 '17 at 0:08
answered Mar 15 '17 at 23:46
Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio
292k33284672
292k33284672
$begingroup$
Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 16 '17 at 0:00
$begingroup$
@ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Mar 16 '17 at 0:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 16 '17 at 0:00
$begingroup$
@ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Mar 16 '17 at 0:10
$begingroup$
Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 16 '17 at 0:00
$begingroup$
Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 16 '17 at 0:00
$begingroup$
@ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Mar 16 '17 at 0:10
$begingroup$
@ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Mar 16 '17 at 0:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$f(x) = x^2$ is continuous everywhere, and hence Riemann-integrable. QED.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:21
1
$begingroup$
I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
$endgroup$
– Hugh Mungus
Mar 15 '17 at 23:39
1
$begingroup$
Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$f(x) = x^2$ is continuous everywhere, and hence Riemann-integrable. QED.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:21
1
$begingroup$
I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
$endgroup$
– Hugh Mungus
Mar 15 '17 at 23:39
1
$begingroup$
Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$f(x) = x^2$ is continuous everywhere, and hence Riemann-integrable. QED.
$endgroup$
$f(x) = x^2$ is continuous everywhere, and hence Riemann-integrable. QED.
answered Mar 15 '17 at 23:16
Hugh MungusHugh Mungus
220110
220110
3
$begingroup$
I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:21
1
$begingroup$
I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
$endgroup$
– Hugh Mungus
Mar 15 '17 at 23:39
1
$begingroup$
Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:43
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:21
1
$begingroup$
I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
$endgroup$
– Hugh Mungus
Mar 15 '17 at 23:39
1
$begingroup$
Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:43
3
3
$begingroup$
I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:21
$begingroup$
I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:21
1
1
$begingroup$
I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
$endgroup$
– Hugh Mungus
Mar 15 '17 at 23:39
$begingroup$
I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
$endgroup$
– Hugh Mungus
Mar 15 '17 at 23:39
1
1
$begingroup$
Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:43
$begingroup$
Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Mar 15 '17 at 23:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume $0leq a<b$.(or $a<bleq 0)$ (For the case $a<0<b$, we may come up with the equation $int_[a,b] f = int_[a,0] f + int_[0,b] f $.)
Following the notation above, we may observe $x_i-1^2 < x_ix_i-1 < x_i^2$ for each $i=1,cdots,n$ so that $$x_i-1^2 < frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)< x_i^2$$
with $x_i-1^2 leq t_i^2 leq x_i^2$ obviously.( for $a<bleq0$, "$<$" would be "$>$")
Then, $$|t_i^2-frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)|<|x_i^2-x_i-1^2|=x_i^2-x_i-1^2$$($-x_i^2+x_i-1^2$ for $a<bleq0$ )
Consequently, if we take $d=d([a,b])$ as $maxDelta_1 x,cdots,Delta_n x$,
the last term you wrote can be bounded as follows.
$$left|sum_i=1^n left(t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right)Delta_i xright| leq sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right|Delta_i x $$
$$leq d sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right| leq d sum_i=1^n left| x_i^2 -x_i-1^2right| = d|b^2-a^2|$$
As a result, $sum_i=1^n f(t_i)Delta_i x rightarrow frac13(b^3-a^3)$ as
$drightarrow0$, regardless of the choice of $t_i$. (Rimann integrability ?)
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume $0leq a<b$.(or $a<bleq 0)$ (For the case $a<0<b$, we may come up with the equation $int_[a,b] f = int_[a,0] f + int_[0,b] f $.)
Following the notation above, we may observe $x_i-1^2 < x_ix_i-1 < x_i^2$ for each $i=1,cdots,n$ so that $$x_i-1^2 < frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)< x_i^2$$
with $x_i-1^2 leq t_i^2 leq x_i^2$ obviously.( for $a<bleq0$, "$<$" would be "$>$")
Then, $$|t_i^2-frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)|<|x_i^2-x_i-1^2|=x_i^2-x_i-1^2$$($-x_i^2+x_i-1^2$ for $a<bleq0$ )
Consequently, if we take $d=d([a,b])$ as $maxDelta_1 x,cdots,Delta_n x$,
the last term you wrote can be bounded as follows.
$$left|sum_i=1^n left(t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right)Delta_i xright| leq sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right|Delta_i x $$
$$leq d sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right| leq d sum_i=1^n left| x_i^2 -x_i-1^2right| = d|b^2-a^2|$$
As a result, $sum_i=1^n f(t_i)Delta_i x rightarrow frac13(b^3-a^3)$ as
$drightarrow0$, regardless of the choice of $t_i$. (Rimann integrability ?)
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume $0leq a<b$.(or $a<bleq 0)$ (For the case $a<0<b$, we may come up with the equation $int_[a,b] f = int_[a,0] f + int_[0,b] f $.)
Following the notation above, we may observe $x_i-1^2 < x_ix_i-1 < x_i^2$ for each $i=1,cdots,n$ so that $$x_i-1^2 < frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)< x_i^2$$
with $x_i-1^2 leq t_i^2 leq x_i^2$ obviously.( for $a<bleq0$, "$<$" would be "$>$")
Then, $$|t_i^2-frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)|<|x_i^2-x_i-1^2|=x_i^2-x_i-1^2$$($-x_i^2+x_i-1^2$ for $a<bleq0$ )
Consequently, if we take $d=d([a,b])$ as $maxDelta_1 x,cdots,Delta_n x$,
the last term you wrote can be bounded as follows.
$$left|sum_i=1^n left(t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right)Delta_i xright| leq sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right|Delta_i x $$
$$leq d sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right| leq d sum_i=1^n left| x_i^2 -x_i-1^2right| = d|b^2-a^2|$$
As a result, $sum_i=1^n f(t_i)Delta_i x rightarrow frac13(b^3-a^3)$ as
$drightarrow0$, regardless of the choice of $t_i$. (Rimann integrability ?)
New contributor
$endgroup$
Assume $0leq a<b$.(or $a<bleq 0)$ (For the case $a<0<b$, we may come up with the equation $int_[a,b] f = int_[a,0] f + int_[0,b] f $.)
Following the notation above, we may observe $x_i-1^2 < x_ix_i-1 < x_i^2$ for each $i=1,cdots,n$ so that $$x_i-1^2 < frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)< x_i^2$$
with $x_i-1^2 leq t_i^2 leq x_i^2$ obviously.( for $a<bleq0$, "$<$" would be "$>$")
Then, $$|t_i^2-frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)|<|x_i^2-x_i-1^2|=x_i^2-x_i-1^2$$($-x_i^2+x_i-1^2$ for $a<bleq0$ )
Consequently, if we take $d=d([a,b])$ as $maxDelta_1 x,cdots,Delta_n x$,
the last term you wrote can be bounded as follows.
$$left|sum_i=1^n left(t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right)Delta_i xright| leq sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right|Delta_i x $$
$$leq d sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right| leq d sum_i=1^n left| x_i^2 -x_i-1^2right| = d|b^2-a^2|$$
As a result, $sum_i=1^n f(t_i)Delta_i x rightarrow frac13(b^3-a^3)$ as
$drightarrow0$, regardless of the choice of $t_i$. (Rimann integrability ?)
New contributor
edited yesterday
Community♦
1
1
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
user190327user190327
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2188575%2fprove-fx-x2-is-riemann-integrable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
$endgroup$
– M. Boyet
Mar 15 '17 at 22:44
$begingroup$
@M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 15 '17 at 23:13