Prove $f(x) = x^2$ is Riemann integrable The Next CEO of Stack OverflowRiemann Sum of $int_-1^1|x| dx$Lebesgue integrable and improper Riemann integrableProving a piecewise function is Riemann integrableRiemann integrable function propertyintegrable riemann functionshow that this function is not Riemann integrable on $[0,1].$Exercise: Prove inequality using Riemann lower sum and integralThomae function is Riemann integrableShow step functions are Riemann integrableProve that this function is Riemann Integrable on $[0,1]$

MAZDA 3 2006 (UK) - poor acceleration then takes off at 3250 revs

Why doesn't a table tennis ball float on the surface? How do we calculate buoyancy here?

Natural language into sentence logic

What do "high sea" and "carry" mean in this sentence?

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Too much space between section and text in a twocolumn document

Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves

Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?

Why were Madagascar and New Zealand discovered so late?

Apart from "berlinern", do any other German dialects have a corresponding verb?

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

Go Pregnant or Go Home

When airplanes disconnect from a tanker during air to air refueling, why do they bank so sharply to the right?

The King's new dress

Where to find order of arguments for default functions

If I blow insulation everywhere in my attic except the door trap, will heat escape through it?

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?

Is it okay to store user locations?

Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!



Prove $f(x) = x^2$ is Riemann integrable



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowRiemann Sum of $int_-1^1|x| dx$Lebesgue integrable and improper Riemann integrableProving a piecewise function is Riemann integrableRiemann integrable function propertyintegrable riemann functionshow that this function is not Riemann integrable on $[0,1].$Exercise: Prove inequality using Riemann lower sum and integralThomae function is Riemann integrableShow step functions are Riemann integrableProve that this function is Riemann Integrable on $[0,1]$










0












$begingroup$


Let $f:[a,b] to mathbb R$ with $f(x) = x^2$, show $int_a^bf(x)dx = frac13(b^3-a^3)$



Here is my trial:

Let $X =(x_0,dots,x_n)$ be a partition on $[a,b]$, let $t_i in [x_i-1,x_i], i=1,dots,n$

Then $|sum_i=1^nf(t_i)triangle_ix - frac13(b^3-a^3)| = |sum_1^nt_i^2triangle_ix - frac13sum_1^nx_i^3-x_i-1^3| \
= |sum_i=1^n[t_i^2 - frac13(x_i^2 + x_ix_i-1 + x_i-1^2)] triangle_ix|$



But now I got stuck... can someone help me out?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Boyet
    Mar 15 '17 at 22:44










  • $begingroup$
    @M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – user370220
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:13















0












$begingroup$


Let $f:[a,b] to mathbb R$ with $f(x) = x^2$, show $int_a^bf(x)dx = frac13(b^3-a^3)$



Here is my trial:

Let $X =(x_0,dots,x_n)$ be a partition on $[a,b]$, let $t_i in [x_i-1,x_i], i=1,dots,n$

Then $|sum_i=1^nf(t_i)triangle_ix - frac13(b^3-a^3)| = |sum_1^nt_i^2triangle_ix - frac13sum_1^nx_i^3-x_i-1^3| \
= |sum_i=1^n[t_i^2 - frac13(x_i^2 + x_ix_i-1 + x_i-1^2)] triangle_ix|$



But now I got stuck... can someone help me out?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Boyet
    Mar 15 '17 at 22:44










  • $begingroup$
    @M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – user370220
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:13













0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $f:[a,b] to mathbb R$ with $f(x) = x^2$, show $int_a^bf(x)dx = frac13(b^3-a^3)$



Here is my trial:

Let $X =(x_0,dots,x_n)$ be a partition on $[a,b]$, let $t_i in [x_i-1,x_i], i=1,dots,n$

Then $|sum_i=1^nf(t_i)triangle_ix - frac13(b^3-a^3)| = |sum_1^nt_i^2triangle_ix - frac13sum_1^nx_i^3-x_i-1^3| \
= |sum_i=1^n[t_i^2 - frac13(x_i^2 + x_ix_i-1 + x_i-1^2)] triangle_ix|$



But now I got stuck... can someone help me out?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f:[a,b] to mathbb R$ with $f(x) = x^2$, show $int_a^bf(x)dx = frac13(b^3-a^3)$



Here is my trial:

Let $X =(x_0,dots,x_n)$ be a partition on $[a,b]$, let $t_i in [x_i-1,x_i], i=1,dots,n$

Then $|sum_i=1^nf(t_i)triangle_ix - frac13(b^3-a^3)| = |sum_1^nt_i^2triangle_ix - frac13sum_1^nx_i^3-x_i-1^3| \
= |sum_i=1^n[t_i^2 - frac13(x_i^2 + x_ix_i-1 + x_i-1^2)] triangle_ix|$



But now I got stuck... can someone help me out?







real-analysis riemann-integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 15 '17 at 22:46









Jack D'Aurizio

292k33284672




292k33284672










asked Mar 15 '17 at 22:39







user370220














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Boyet
    Mar 15 '17 at 22:44










  • $begingroup$
    @M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – user370220
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:13












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Boyet
    Mar 15 '17 at 22:44










  • $begingroup$
    @M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – user370220
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:13







1




1




$begingroup$
A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
$endgroup$
– M. Boyet
Mar 15 '17 at 22:44




$begingroup$
A hint : in your last expression, use $t_i^2 = frac33t_i^2$ to have three sums, then you can bound the differences $|t_i-x_i|$ by $Delta_i x$ which is enough to guarantee these three sums tends to zero.
$endgroup$
– M. Boyet
Mar 15 '17 at 22:44












$begingroup$
@M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 15 '17 at 23:13




$begingroup$
@M.Boyet Sorry I still dont understand it .. Now I have $|t_i^2 - x_i^2|,|t_i^2 - x_ix_i-1|,t_i^2 - x_i-1^2$.. Which identity I should use to make them bounded by $Delta_ix$ ?
$endgroup$
– user370220
Mar 15 '17 at 23:13










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

I guess this answer has been given many times, but I am too lazy to find a reference, I prefer to write it again. It is useful to prove first that
$$ sum_k=1^n k^2 = fracn(n+1)(2n+1)6tag1 $$
holds. That can be done in many ways, for instance by induction or by the hockey-stick identity:
$$ sum_k=1^nk^2 = sum_k=1^nleft[2binomk2+binomk1right] = 2binomn+13+binomn+12.tag2$$
For the function $f(x)=x^2$ over the interval $(0,1)$, the upper and lower Riemann sums for uniform partitions are given in terms of
$$ frac1Nsum_k=1^Nleft(frackNright)^2,qquad frac1Nsum_k=0^N-1left(frackNright)^2 tag3 $$
and the limit of both, as $Nto +infty$, equals $frac13$ by $(1)$. At last,
$$ int_a^bx^2,dx = int_0^bx^2,dx - int_0^ax^2,dx = (b^3-a^3)int_0^1x^2,dxtag4 $$
proves the claim.




Addendum. With a geometric flavour (i.e. integrating along sections), $int_a^bx^2,dx$, if $0<a<b$, is just $frac1pi$ times the volume of a frustum of a cone with height $b-a$ and radii of the bases given by $a$ and $b$. The formula
$$ V = fracpi h3(R^2+Rr+r^2) $$
is known since the Babylonian period and can be easily proved through similarities, once we know that the volume of a cone (or pyramid) is $frac13hcdot A_textbase$. Through Cavalieri's principle and the property of linear maps of proserving ratios of volumes, the whole question boils down to finding the volume of a pyramid given by the convex envelope of a face of a cube and the center of the same cube. That trivially is $frac16V_textcube$ by symmetry.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
    $endgroup$
    – user370220
    Mar 16 '17 at 0:00










  • $begingroup$
    @ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Mar 16 '17 at 0:10


















1












$begingroup$

$f(x) = x^2$ is continuous everywhere, and hence Riemann-integrable. QED.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
    $endgroup$
    – Hugh Mungus
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:43



















1












$begingroup$

Assume $0leq a<b$.(or $a<bleq 0)$ (For the case $a<0<b$, we may come up with the equation $int_[a,b] f = int_[a,0] f + int_[0,b] f $.)



Following the notation above, we may observe $x_i-1^2 < x_ix_i-1 < x_i^2$ for each $i=1,cdots,n$ so that $$x_i-1^2 < frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)< x_i^2$$



with $x_i-1^2 leq t_i^2 leq x_i^2$ obviously.( for $a<bleq0$, "$<$" would be "$>$")



Then, $$|t_i^2-frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)|<|x_i^2-x_i-1^2|=x_i^2-x_i-1^2$$($-x_i^2+x_i-1^2$ for $a<bleq0$ )



Consequently, if we take $d=d([a,b])$ as $maxDelta_1 x,cdots,Delta_n x$,



the last term you wrote can be bounded as follows.



$$left|sum_i=1^n left(t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right)Delta_i xright| leq sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right|Delta_i x $$
$$leq d sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right| leq d sum_i=1^n left| x_i^2 -x_i-1^2right| = d|b^2-a^2|$$



As a result, $sum_i=1^n f(t_i)Delta_i x rightarrow frac13(b^3-a^3)$ as
$drightarrow0$, regardless of the choice of $t_i$. (Rimann integrability ?)






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




user190327 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2188575%2fprove-fx-x2-is-riemann-integrable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown
























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    I guess this answer has been given many times, but I am too lazy to find a reference, I prefer to write it again. It is useful to prove first that
    $$ sum_k=1^n k^2 = fracn(n+1)(2n+1)6tag1 $$
    holds. That can be done in many ways, for instance by induction or by the hockey-stick identity:
    $$ sum_k=1^nk^2 = sum_k=1^nleft[2binomk2+binomk1right] = 2binomn+13+binomn+12.tag2$$
    For the function $f(x)=x^2$ over the interval $(0,1)$, the upper and lower Riemann sums for uniform partitions are given in terms of
    $$ frac1Nsum_k=1^Nleft(frackNright)^2,qquad frac1Nsum_k=0^N-1left(frackNright)^2 tag3 $$
    and the limit of both, as $Nto +infty$, equals $frac13$ by $(1)$. At last,
    $$ int_a^bx^2,dx = int_0^bx^2,dx - int_0^ax^2,dx = (b^3-a^3)int_0^1x^2,dxtag4 $$
    proves the claim.




    Addendum. With a geometric flavour (i.e. integrating along sections), $int_a^bx^2,dx$, if $0<a<b$, is just $frac1pi$ times the volume of a frustum of a cone with height $b-a$ and radii of the bases given by $a$ and $b$. The formula
    $$ V = fracpi h3(R^2+Rr+r^2) $$
    is known since the Babylonian period and can be easily proved through similarities, once we know that the volume of a cone (or pyramid) is $frac13hcdot A_textbase$. Through Cavalieri's principle and the property of linear maps of proserving ratios of volumes, the whole question boils down to finding the volume of a pyramid given by the convex envelope of a face of a cube and the center of the same cube. That trivially is $frac16V_textcube$ by symmetry.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
      $endgroup$
      – user370220
      Mar 16 '17 at 0:00










    • $begingroup$
      @ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack D'Aurizio
      Mar 16 '17 at 0:10















    3












    $begingroup$

    I guess this answer has been given many times, but I am too lazy to find a reference, I prefer to write it again. It is useful to prove first that
    $$ sum_k=1^n k^2 = fracn(n+1)(2n+1)6tag1 $$
    holds. That can be done in many ways, for instance by induction or by the hockey-stick identity:
    $$ sum_k=1^nk^2 = sum_k=1^nleft[2binomk2+binomk1right] = 2binomn+13+binomn+12.tag2$$
    For the function $f(x)=x^2$ over the interval $(0,1)$, the upper and lower Riemann sums for uniform partitions are given in terms of
    $$ frac1Nsum_k=1^Nleft(frackNright)^2,qquad frac1Nsum_k=0^N-1left(frackNright)^2 tag3 $$
    and the limit of both, as $Nto +infty$, equals $frac13$ by $(1)$. At last,
    $$ int_a^bx^2,dx = int_0^bx^2,dx - int_0^ax^2,dx = (b^3-a^3)int_0^1x^2,dxtag4 $$
    proves the claim.




    Addendum. With a geometric flavour (i.e. integrating along sections), $int_a^bx^2,dx$, if $0<a<b$, is just $frac1pi$ times the volume of a frustum of a cone with height $b-a$ and radii of the bases given by $a$ and $b$. The formula
    $$ V = fracpi h3(R^2+Rr+r^2) $$
    is known since the Babylonian period and can be easily proved through similarities, once we know that the volume of a cone (or pyramid) is $frac13hcdot A_textbase$. Through Cavalieri's principle and the property of linear maps of proserving ratios of volumes, the whole question boils down to finding the volume of a pyramid given by the convex envelope of a face of a cube and the center of the same cube. That trivially is $frac16V_textcube$ by symmetry.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
      $endgroup$
      – user370220
      Mar 16 '17 at 0:00










    • $begingroup$
      @ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack D'Aurizio
      Mar 16 '17 at 0:10













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    I guess this answer has been given many times, but I am too lazy to find a reference, I prefer to write it again. It is useful to prove first that
    $$ sum_k=1^n k^2 = fracn(n+1)(2n+1)6tag1 $$
    holds. That can be done in many ways, for instance by induction or by the hockey-stick identity:
    $$ sum_k=1^nk^2 = sum_k=1^nleft[2binomk2+binomk1right] = 2binomn+13+binomn+12.tag2$$
    For the function $f(x)=x^2$ over the interval $(0,1)$, the upper and lower Riemann sums for uniform partitions are given in terms of
    $$ frac1Nsum_k=1^Nleft(frackNright)^2,qquad frac1Nsum_k=0^N-1left(frackNright)^2 tag3 $$
    and the limit of both, as $Nto +infty$, equals $frac13$ by $(1)$. At last,
    $$ int_a^bx^2,dx = int_0^bx^2,dx - int_0^ax^2,dx = (b^3-a^3)int_0^1x^2,dxtag4 $$
    proves the claim.




    Addendum. With a geometric flavour (i.e. integrating along sections), $int_a^bx^2,dx$, if $0<a<b$, is just $frac1pi$ times the volume of a frustum of a cone with height $b-a$ and radii of the bases given by $a$ and $b$. The formula
    $$ V = fracpi h3(R^2+Rr+r^2) $$
    is known since the Babylonian period and can be easily proved through similarities, once we know that the volume of a cone (or pyramid) is $frac13hcdot A_textbase$. Through Cavalieri's principle and the property of linear maps of proserving ratios of volumes, the whole question boils down to finding the volume of a pyramid given by the convex envelope of a face of a cube and the center of the same cube. That trivially is $frac16V_textcube$ by symmetry.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I guess this answer has been given many times, but I am too lazy to find a reference, I prefer to write it again. It is useful to prove first that
    $$ sum_k=1^n k^2 = fracn(n+1)(2n+1)6tag1 $$
    holds. That can be done in many ways, for instance by induction or by the hockey-stick identity:
    $$ sum_k=1^nk^2 = sum_k=1^nleft[2binomk2+binomk1right] = 2binomn+13+binomn+12.tag2$$
    For the function $f(x)=x^2$ over the interval $(0,1)$, the upper and lower Riemann sums for uniform partitions are given in terms of
    $$ frac1Nsum_k=1^Nleft(frackNright)^2,qquad frac1Nsum_k=0^N-1left(frackNright)^2 tag3 $$
    and the limit of both, as $Nto +infty$, equals $frac13$ by $(1)$. At last,
    $$ int_a^bx^2,dx = int_0^bx^2,dx - int_0^ax^2,dx = (b^3-a^3)int_0^1x^2,dxtag4 $$
    proves the claim.




    Addendum. With a geometric flavour (i.e. integrating along sections), $int_a^bx^2,dx$, if $0<a<b$, is just $frac1pi$ times the volume of a frustum of a cone with height $b-a$ and radii of the bases given by $a$ and $b$. The formula
    $$ V = fracpi h3(R^2+Rr+r^2) $$
    is known since the Babylonian period and can be easily proved through similarities, once we know that the volume of a cone (or pyramid) is $frac13hcdot A_textbase$. Through Cavalieri's principle and the property of linear maps of proserving ratios of volumes, the whole question boils down to finding the volume of a pyramid given by the convex envelope of a face of a cube and the center of the same cube. That trivially is $frac16V_textcube$ by symmetry.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Mar 16 '17 at 0:08

























    answered Mar 15 '17 at 23:46









    Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio

    292k33284672




    292k33284672











    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
      $endgroup$
      – user370220
      Mar 16 '17 at 0:00










    • $begingroup$
      @ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack D'Aurizio
      Mar 16 '17 at 0:10
















    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
      $endgroup$
      – user370220
      Mar 16 '17 at 0:00










    • $begingroup$
      @ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack D'Aurizio
      Mar 16 '17 at 0:10















    $begingroup$
    Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
    $endgroup$
    – user370220
    Mar 16 '17 at 0:00




    $begingroup$
    Thanks, but for this question I am required to prove it just using the defintion.. which means I cannot use your last expression..
    $endgroup$
    – user370220
    Mar 16 '17 at 0:00












    $begingroup$
    @ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Mar 16 '17 at 0:10




    $begingroup$
    @ZHANGYUE: then just replace every occurence of $frackN$ in $(3)$ with $a+frackN(b-a)$. You may still compute the upper and lower Riemann sums in a explicit way through $(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Mar 16 '17 at 0:10











    1












    $begingroup$

    $f(x) = x^2$ is continuous everywhere, and hence Riemann-integrable. QED.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:21






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
      $endgroup$
      – Hugh Mungus
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:39






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:43
















    1












    $begingroup$

    $f(x) = x^2$ is continuous everywhere, and hence Riemann-integrable. QED.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:21






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
      $endgroup$
      – Hugh Mungus
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:39






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:43














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    $f(x) = x^2$ is continuous everywhere, and hence Riemann-integrable. QED.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    $f(x) = x^2$ is continuous everywhere, and hence Riemann-integrable. QED.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Mar 15 '17 at 23:16









    Hugh MungusHugh Mungus

    220110




    220110







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:21






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
      $endgroup$
      – Hugh Mungus
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:39






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:43













    • 3




      $begingroup$
      I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:21






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
      $endgroup$
      – Hugh Mungus
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:39






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Mar 15 '17 at 23:43








    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:21




    $begingroup$
    I guess OP wants a proof by definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:21




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
    $endgroup$
    – Hugh Mungus
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:39




    $begingroup$
    I figured as much; my answer was just to be cheeky.
    $endgroup$
    – Hugh Mungus
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:39




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:43





    $begingroup$
    Well, in that case define the function $mathrmI$ from the space of step functions to $Bbb R$ as to coincide with Riemann, show it is linear continuous, hence it satisfies an inequality of the form $|mathrmI(s)| leq lambda |s|;$ thus, it has a unique extension towards the completion of the space (the reglèe functions). By doing that, you proved that every function sufficiently regular has integral; bonus, the method works well for vector functions too.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Mar 15 '17 at 23:43












    1












    $begingroup$

    Assume $0leq a<b$.(or $a<bleq 0)$ (For the case $a<0<b$, we may come up with the equation $int_[a,b] f = int_[a,0] f + int_[0,b] f $.)



    Following the notation above, we may observe $x_i-1^2 < x_ix_i-1 < x_i^2$ for each $i=1,cdots,n$ so that $$x_i-1^2 < frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)< x_i^2$$



    with $x_i-1^2 leq t_i^2 leq x_i^2$ obviously.( for $a<bleq0$, "$<$" would be "$>$")



    Then, $$|t_i^2-frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)|<|x_i^2-x_i-1^2|=x_i^2-x_i-1^2$$($-x_i^2+x_i-1^2$ for $a<bleq0$ )



    Consequently, if we take $d=d([a,b])$ as $maxDelta_1 x,cdots,Delta_n x$,



    the last term you wrote can be bounded as follows.



    $$left|sum_i=1^n left(t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right)Delta_i xright| leq sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right|Delta_i x $$
    $$leq d sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right| leq d sum_i=1^n left| x_i^2 -x_i-1^2right| = d|b^2-a^2|$$



    As a result, $sum_i=1^n f(t_i)Delta_i x rightarrow frac13(b^3-a^3)$ as
    $drightarrow0$, regardless of the choice of $t_i$. (Rimann integrability ?)






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    user190327 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      Assume $0leq a<b$.(or $a<bleq 0)$ (For the case $a<0<b$, we may come up with the equation $int_[a,b] f = int_[a,0] f + int_[0,b] f $.)



      Following the notation above, we may observe $x_i-1^2 < x_ix_i-1 < x_i^2$ for each $i=1,cdots,n$ so that $$x_i-1^2 < frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)< x_i^2$$



      with $x_i-1^2 leq t_i^2 leq x_i^2$ obviously.( for $a<bleq0$, "$<$" would be "$>$")



      Then, $$|t_i^2-frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)|<|x_i^2-x_i-1^2|=x_i^2-x_i-1^2$$($-x_i^2+x_i-1^2$ for $a<bleq0$ )



      Consequently, if we take $d=d([a,b])$ as $maxDelta_1 x,cdots,Delta_n x$,



      the last term you wrote can be bounded as follows.



      $$left|sum_i=1^n left(t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right)Delta_i xright| leq sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right|Delta_i x $$
      $$leq d sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right| leq d sum_i=1^n left| x_i^2 -x_i-1^2right| = d|b^2-a^2|$$



      As a result, $sum_i=1^n f(t_i)Delta_i x rightarrow frac13(b^3-a^3)$ as
      $drightarrow0$, regardless of the choice of $t_i$. (Rimann integrability ?)






      share|cite|improve this answer










      New contributor




      user190327 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Assume $0leq a<b$.(or $a<bleq 0)$ (For the case $a<0<b$, we may come up with the equation $int_[a,b] f = int_[a,0] f + int_[0,b] f $.)



        Following the notation above, we may observe $x_i-1^2 < x_ix_i-1 < x_i^2$ for each $i=1,cdots,n$ so that $$x_i-1^2 < frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)< x_i^2$$



        with $x_i-1^2 leq t_i^2 leq x_i^2$ obviously.( for $a<bleq0$, "$<$" would be "$>$")



        Then, $$|t_i^2-frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)|<|x_i^2-x_i-1^2|=x_i^2-x_i-1^2$$($-x_i^2+x_i-1^2$ for $a<bleq0$ )



        Consequently, if we take $d=d([a,b])$ as $maxDelta_1 x,cdots,Delta_n x$,



        the last term you wrote can be bounded as follows.



        $$left|sum_i=1^n left(t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right)Delta_i xright| leq sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right|Delta_i x $$
        $$leq d sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right| leq d sum_i=1^n left| x_i^2 -x_i-1^2right| = d|b^2-a^2|$$



        As a result, $sum_i=1^n f(t_i)Delta_i x rightarrow frac13(b^3-a^3)$ as
        $drightarrow0$, regardless of the choice of $t_i$. (Rimann integrability ?)






        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        user190327 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        Assume $0leq a<b$.(or $a<bleq 0)$ (For the case $a<0<b$, we may come up with the equation $int_[a,b] f = int_[a,0] f + int_[0,b] f $.)



        Following the notation above, we may observe $x_i-1^2 < x_ix_i-1 < x_i^2$ for each $i=1,cdots,n$ so that $$x_i-1^2 < frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)< x_i^2$$



        with $x_i-1^2 leq t_i^2 leq x_i^2$ obviously.( for $a<bleq0$, "$<$" would be "$>$")



        Then, $$|t_i^2-frac13(x_i-1^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i^2)|<|x_i^2-x_i-1^2|=x_i^2-x_i-1^2$$($-x_i^2+x_i-1^2$ for $a<bleq0$ )



        Consequently, if we take $d=d([a,b])$ as $maxDelta_1 x,cdots,Delta_n x$,



        the last term you wrote can be bounded as follows.



        $$left|sum_i=1^n left(t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right)Delta_i xright| leq sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right|Delta_i x $$
        $$leq d sum_i=1^n left|t_i^2-frac13(x_i^2+x_i-1x_i+x_i-1^2)right| leq d sum_i=1^n left| x_i^2 -x_i-1^2right| = d|b^2-a^2|$$



        As a result, $sum_i=1^n f(t_i)Delta_i x rightarrow frac13(b^3-a^3)$ as
        $drightarrow0$, regardless of the choice of $t_i$. (Rimann integrability ?)







        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        user190327 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday









        Community

        1




        1






        New contributor




        user190327 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 2 days ago









        user190327user190327

        111




        111




        New contributor




        user190327 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        user190327 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        user190327 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2188575%2fprove-fx-x2-is-riemann-integrable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

            Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

            Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ