help with sum of infinite series, stuck in problem The Next CEO of Stack OverflowComparing series with convergent seriesHow to calculate the sum of the infinite series $sum_n = 0^infty fracn2^sqrtn$Calculating the sum of an infinite series (high school calc)Infinite sum of alternating telescoping seriesHelp understanding the sequence of partial sums of a seriesSum of an infinite series $(1 - frac 12) + (frac 12 - frac 13) + cdots$ - not geometric series?Definition of series and their relation to sequences and functionsLimit of an infinite series as limit of sequence of partial sums.Convergence test for partial sum whose elements all change as the index increasesLimit Of Infinite Series

If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?

What's the point of interval inversion?

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

How can I open an app using Terminal?

How do I solve this limit?

Why do remote companies require working in the US?

How should I support this large drywall patch?

Why here is plural "We went to the movies last night."

How do I construct this japanese bowl?

How to write the block matrix in LaTex?

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

Is it safe to use c_str() on a temporary string?

Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

Whats the best way to handle refactoring a big file?

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

What is the point of a new vote on May's deal when the indicative votes suggest she will not win?

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

Fastest way to shutdown Ubuntu Mate 18.10

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Opposite of a diet

When airplanes disconnect from a tanker during air to air refueling, why do they bank so sharply to the right?



help with sum of infinite series, stuck in problem



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowComparing series with convergent seriesHow to calculate the sum of the infinite series $sum_n = 0^infty fracn2^sqrtn$Calculating the sum of an infinite series (high school calc)Infinite sum of alternating telescoping seriesHelp understanding the sequence of partial sums of a seriesSum of an infinite series $(1 - frac 12) + (frac 12 - frac 13) + cdots$ - not geometric series?Definition of series and their relation to sequences and functionsLimit of an infinite series as limit of sequence of partial sums.Convergence test for partial sum whose elements all change as the index increasesLimit Of Infinite Series










1












$begingroup$


the series in the problem is as follows, and we would like to see if the series converges, and what is the sum of infinite series:



$$sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$$



It's a homework problem, but I already asked my teacher about it at school and he didn't really help me that much.



The earlier problems that we had were easier than this one, because I cannot find the common ratio for this infinite series (infinite geometric series should have common ratio, and when you know it you can tell if there is convergence)



I read online after class, that what I should do is to find the limit of the sequence of partial sums.
This limit, if it exists and is a real-number, should be the value of the sum of the infinite series.



It makes sense conceptually when you have a large value of k, for a finite series $S_k$, when k becomes larger the finite sum becomes more and more like the sum of infinite series.



So that if I have partial sums in a sequence $S_1, S_2, S_3...S_k $
The larger the k, the better it is representing infinite series, assuming it converges at all, towards anything.



I managed to put some large values of n, into wolfram alpha and the correct answer seems to be that the infinite series converges and sum of infinite series is 4.5



But I don't have a solid idea how I could find the explicit formula for the sequence of partial sums for this particular infinite series. And I don't particularly have any other good ideas how to prove that the sum of infinite series should be 4.5 in this case...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    the series in the problem is as follows, and we would like to see if the series converges, and what is the sum of infinite series:



    $$sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$$



    It's a homework problem, but I already asked my teacher about it at school and he didn't really help me that much.



    The earlier problems that we had were easier than this one, because I cannot find the common ratio for this infinite series (infinite geometric series should have common ratio, and when you know it you can tell if there is convergence)



    I read online after class, that what I should do is to find the limit of the sequence of partial sums.
    This limit, if it exists and is a real-number, should be the value of the sum of the infinite series.



    It makes sense conceptually when you have a large value of k, for a finite series $S_k$, when k becomes larger the finite sum becomes more and more like the sum of infinite series.



    So that if I have partial sums in a sequence $S_1, S_2, S_3...S_k $
    The larger the k, the better it is representing infinite series, assuming it converges at all, towards anything.



    I managed to put some large values of n, into wolfram alpha and the correct answer seems to be that the infinite series converges and sum of infinite series is 4.5



    But I don't have a solid idea how I could find the explicit formula for the sequence of partial sums for this particular infinite series. And I don't particularly have any other good ideas how to prove that the sum of infinite series should be 4.5 in this case...










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      the series in the problem is as follows, and we would like to see if the series converges, and what is the sum of infinite series:



      $$sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$$



      It's a homework problem, but I already asked my teacher about it at school and he didn't really help me that much.



      The earlier problems that we had were easier than this one, because I cannot find the common ratio for this infinite series (infinite geometric series should have common ratio, and when you know it you can tell if there is convergence)



      I read online after class, that what I should do is to find the limit of the sequence of partial sums.
      This limit, if it exists and is a real-number, should be the value of the sum of the infinite series.



      It makes sense conceptually when you have a large value of k, for a finite series $S_k$, when k becomes larger the finite sum becomes more and more like the sum of infinite series.



      So that if I have partial sums in a sequence $S_1, S_2, S_3...S_k $
      The larger the k, the better it is representing infinite series, assuming it converges at all, towards anything.



      I managed to put some large values of n, into wolfram alpha and the correct answer seems to be that the infinite series converges and sum of infinite series is 4.5



      But I don't have a solid idea how I could find the explicit formula for the sequence of partial sums for this particular infinite series. And I don't particularly have any other good ideas how to prove that the sum of infinite series should be 4.5 in this case...










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      the series in the problem is as follows, and we would like to see if the series converges, and what is the sum of infinite series:



      $$sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$$



      It's a homework problem, but I already asked my teacher about it at school and he didn't really help me that much.



      The earlier problems that we had were easier than this one, because I cannot find the common ratio for this infinite series (infinite geometric series should have common ratio, and when you know it you can tell if there is convergence)



      I read online after class, that what I should do is to find the limit of the sequence of partial sums.
      This limit, if it exists and is a real-number, should be the value of the sum of the infinite series.



      It makes sense conceptually when you have a large value of k, for a finite series $S_k$, when k becomes larger the finite sum becomes more and more like the sum of infinite series.



      So that if I have partial sums in a sequence $S_1, S_2, S_3...S_k $
      The larger the k, the better it is representing infinite series, assuming it converges at all, towards anything.



      I managed to put some large values of n, into wolfram alpha and the correct answer seems to be that the infinite series converges and sum of infinite series is 4.5



      But I don't have a solid idea how I could find the explicit formula for the sequence of partial sums for this particular infinite series. And I don't particularly have any other good ideas how to prove that the sum of infinite series should be 4.5 in this case...







      sequences-and-series convergence summation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      José Carlos Santos

      171k23132240




      171k23132240










      asked Jan 25 '18 at 15:40









      Late347Late347

      366




      366




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10












          $begingroup$

          $$sum_n=1^inftyfrac2^n+1+13^n=2sum_n=1^inftyleft(frac23right)^n+sum_n=1^inftyleft(frac13right)^n.$$Can you take it from here?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Can you clarify where you get the idea to split the series like that, I'm not very good at the calculation rules for sums (sigma)... Indeed I only really studied about infinite series last week. I mean does there exist some algebraic formulas for manipulation of sums like that
            $endgroup$
            – Late347
            Jan 25 '18 at 15:55










          • $begingroup$
            @Late347 Yes: if both series $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ and $sum_n=1^infty b_n$ converge, then the series $sum_n=1^infty(a_n+b_n)$ converges too and its sum is the sum of the two original series.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Jan 25 '18 at 15:57


















          1












          $begingroup$

          After 20 years, I still have to rederive the identity
          $$ sum_n=1^infty alpha^n = fracalpha1-alpha tag1$$
          whenever I need it. Since it isn't that difficult, perhaps we should do that first.



          Suppose that $|alpha| < 1$, and let
          $$ S_k := sum_n=1^k alpha^k = alpha + alpha^2 + dotsb + alpha^k $$
          be the $k$-th partial sum. Then
          $$ alpha S_k = sum_n=1^k alpha^k+1 = alpha^2 + alpha^3 + dotsb + alpha^k+1. $$
          Subtracting, we obtain
          beginalign
          (1-alpha) S_k
          &= S_k - alpha S_k \
          &= left( alpha + alpha^2 + dotsb + alpha^k right) - left( alpha^2 + alpha^3 + dotsb + alpha^k+1 right) \
          &= alpha + left( alpha^2 - alpha^2right) + left( alpha^3 - alpha^3right) + dotsb + left(alpha^k - alpha^kright) - alpha^k+1 \
          &= alpha - alpha^k+1.
          endalign
          Solving for $S_k$, we get
          $$ S_k = fracalpha - alpha^k+11-alpha. $$
          Since $|alpha| < 1$, it follows that $lim_ktoinfty alpha^k+1 = 0$, and so
          $$
          sum_n=1^infty alpha^n
          := lim_kto infty sum_n=1^k alpha^n
          = lim_ktoinfty fracalpha - alpha^k+11-alpha
          = fracalpha1-alpha.
          $$
          But this is exactly the identity at (1). Huzzah!




          Now, how do we use this here?



          Observe that
          $$ frac2^n+1 + 13^n
          = frac2^n+13^n + frac13^n
          = 2 left( frac23 right)^n + left( frac13 right)^n.
          tag2$$
          But series are linear, and so play nice with addition and multiplication. Specifically, if $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ converge, and $C$ is any constant, then we have
          $$ sum_n=1^infty left[ a_n + b_n right] = sum_n=1^infty a_n + sum_n=1^infty b_n
          qquadtextandqquad
          sum_n=1^infty Ca_n = C sum_n=1^infty a_n. $$
          These are basic rules for "simplifying" series, which are going to be quite useful for you. If you are familiar with integration, you can perform exactly these manipulations if you replace the $sum$ with $int$, and the sequences with functions. If you are not familiar with integration, ignore this comment for now, but maybe keep it in the back of your mind for later.
          beginalign
          sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1 + 13^n
          &= sum_n=1^infty left[ 2 left( frac23 right)^n + left( frac13 right)^n right] && (textby application of (2)) \
          &= 2sum_n=1^infty left( frac23 right)^n + sum_n=1^infty left( frac13 right)^n && (textsimplify the series) \
          &= 2 cdot fracfrac231-frac23 + fracfrac131- frac13 && (textby application of (1)) \
          &= 2 cdot fracfrac231-frac23cdot frac33 + fracfrac131- frac13cdot frac33 && (textsilly, pedantic arithmetic) \
          &= 2 cdot frac23-2 + frac13-1 && (textmore pedantic arithmetic) \
          &= frac41 + frac12 && (textand some more) \
          &= frac8+12 && (textalmost there) \
          &= frac92. && (textdone!)
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            IT looks very understandable now, I jotted down my own version on a piece of paper here at my desk. My worries and further question is more about the justification of splitting the Series into two separate series... Doesn't there have to be the assumption such that the combined original series has to be convergent to begin with before manipulating? $ sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$
            $endgroup$
            – Late347
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:31










          • $begingroup$
            EDIT I just wanted to ask for sure, because I don't want to do silly mistakes with the infinite series... I still have a bad taste in my own mouth after having watched the numberphile video about summing divergent infinite series into each other (the video can be found on youtube with "1+2+3... = -1/12")
            $endgroup$
            – Late347
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:33










          • $begingroup$
            The justification kind of comes in through the back door. If $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ are convergent, then $sum (a_n + b_n)$ converges, and $sum (a_n + b_n) = sum a_n + sum b_n$. In the argument above, we break up a series of the form $sum (a_n + b_n)$ into two different convergent series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$, then use the fact that both of these converge in order to show that the original series converges.
            $endgroup$
            – Xander Henderson
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:39










          • $begingroup$
            On the other hand, if all you need to know is that the original series converges (and this might assuage your conscience regarding this assumption), you might note that $2^n+1 + 1 < 2^n+2$ for all $n$, and $sum frac2^n+23^n$ is a convergent geometric series. But then $$ 0 < sum frac2^n+1+13^n le sum frac2^n+23^n < infty, $$ which demonstrates that the original series does, in fact, converge.
            $endgroup$
            – Xander Henderson
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:43


















          0












          $begingroup$

          You can split the sum and use



          $$sum_n=1^infty r^n=fracr1-r$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2620771%2fhelp-with-sum-of-infinite-series-stuck-in-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            10












            $begingroup$

            $$sum_n=1^inftyfrac2^n+1+13^n=2sum_n=1^inftyleft(frac23right)^n+sum_n=1^inftyleft(frac13right)^n.$$Can you take it from here?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Can you clarify where you get the idea to split the series like that, I'm not very good at the calculation rules for sums (sigma)... Indeed I only really studied about infinite series last week. I mean does there exist some algebraic formulas for manipulation of sums like that
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 15:55










            • $begingroup$
              @Late347 Yes: if both series $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ and $sum_n=1^infty b_n$ converge, then the series $sum_n=1^infty(a_n+b_n)$ converges too and its sum is the sum of the two original series.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Jan 25 '18 at 15:57















            10












            $begingroup$

            $$sum_n=1^inftyfrac2^n+1+13^n=2sum_n=1^inftyleft(frac23right)^n+sum_n=1^inftyleft(frac13right)^n.$$Can you take it from here?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Can you clarify where you get the idea to split the series like that, I'm not very good at the calculation rules for sums (sigma)... Indeed I only really studied about infinite series last week. I mean does there exist some algebraic formulas for manipulation of sums like that
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 15:55










            • $begingroup$
              @Late347 Yes: if both series $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ and $sum_n=1^infty b_n$ converge, then the series $sum_n=1^infty(a_n+b_n)$ converges too and its sum is the sum of the two original series.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Jan 25 '18 at 15:57













            10












            10








            10





            $begingroup$

            $$sum_n=1^inftyfrac2^n+1+13^n=2sum_n=1^inftyleft(frac23right)^n+sum_n=1^inftyleft(frac13right)^n.$$Can you take it from here?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            $$sum_n=1^inftyfrac2^n+1+13^n=2sum_n=1^inftyleft(frac23right)^n+sum_n=1^inftyleft(frac13right)^n.$$Can you take it from here?







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 25 '18 at 15:43









            José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

            171k23132240




            171k23132240











            • $begingroup$
              Can you clarify where you get the idea to split the series like that, I'm not very good at the calculation rules for sums (sigma)... Indeed I only really studied about infinite series last week. I mean does there exist some algebraic formulas for manipulation of sums like that
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 15:55










            • $begingroup$
              @Late347 Yes: if both series $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ and $sum_n=1^infty b_n$ converge, then the series $sum_n=1^infty(a_n+b_n)$ converges too and its sum is the sum of the two original series.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Jan 25 '18 at 15:57
















            • $begingroup$
              Can you clarify where you get the idea to split the series like that, I'm not very good at the calculation rules for sums (sigma)... Indeed I only really studied about infinite series last week. I mean does there exist some algebraic formulas for manipulation of sums like that
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 15:55










            • $begingroup$
              @Late347 Yes: if both series $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ and $sum_n=1^infty b_n$ converge, then the series $sum_n=1^infty(a_n+b_n)$ converges too and its sum is the sum of the two original series.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Jan 25 '18 at 15:57















            $begingroup$
            Can you clarify where you get the idea to split the series like that, I'm not very good at the calculation rules for sums (sigma)... Indeed I only really studied about infinite series last week. I mean does there exist some algebraic formulas for manipulation of sums like that
            $endgroup$
            – Late347
            Jan 25 '18 at 15:55




            $begingroup$
            Can you clarify where you get the idea to split the series like that, I'm not very good at the calculation rules for sums (sigma)... Indeed I only really studied about infinite series last week. I mean does there exist some algebraic formulas for manipulation of sums like that
            $endgroup$
            – Late347
            Jan 25 '18 at 15:55












            $begingroup$
            @Late347 Yes: if both series $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ and $sum_n=1^infty b_n$ converge, then the series $sum_n=1^infty(a_n+b_n)$ converges too and its sum is the sum of the two original series.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Jan 25 '18 at 15:57




            $begingroup$
            @Late347 Yes: if both series $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ and $sum_n=1^infty b_n$ converge, then the series $sum_n=1^infty(a_n+b_n)$ converges too and its sum is the sum of the two original series.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Jan 25 '18 at 15:57











            1












            $begingroup$

            After 20 years, I still have to rederive the identity
            $$ sum_n=1^infty alpha^n = fracalpha1-alpha tag1$$
            whenever I need it. Since it isn't that difficult, perhaps we should do that first.



            Suppose that $|alpha| < 1$, and let
            $$ S_k := sum_n=1^k alpha^k = alpha + alpha^2 + dotsb + alpha^k $$
            be the $k$-th partial sum. Then
            $$ alpha S_k = sum_n=1^k alpha^k+1 = alpha^2 + alpha^3 + dotsb + alpha^k+1. $$
            Subtracting, we obtain
            beginalign
            (1-alpha) S_k
            &= S_k - alpha S_k \
            &= left( alpha + alpha^2 + dotsb + alpha^k right) - left( alpha^2 + alpha^3 + dotsb + alpha^k+1 right) \
            &= alpha + left( alpha^2 - alpha^2right) + left( alpha^3 - alpha^3right) + dotsb + left(alpha^k - alpha^kright) - alpha^k+1 \
            &= alpha - alpha^k+1.
            endalign
            Solving for $S_k$, we get
            $$ S_k = fracalpha - alpha^k+11-alpha. $$
            Since $|alpha| < 1$, it follows that $lim_ktoinfty alpha^k+1 = 0$, and so
            $$
            sum_n=1^infty alpha^n
            := lim_kto infty sum_n=1^k alpha^n
            = lim_ktoinfty fracalpha - alpha^k+11-alpha
            = fracalpha1-alpha.
            $$
            But this is exactly the identity at (1). Huzzah!




            Now, how do we use this here?



            Observe that
            $$ frac2^n+1 + 13^n
            = frac2^n+13^n + frac13^n
            = 2 left( frac23 right)^n + left( frac13 right)^n.
            tag2$$
            But series are linear, and so play nice with addition and multiplication. Specifically, if $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ converge, and $C$ is any constant, then we have
            $$ sum_n=1^infty left[ a_n + b_n right] = sum_n=1^infty a_n + sum_n=1^infty b_n
            qquadtextandqquad
            sum_n=1^infty Ca_n = C sum_n=1^infty a_n. $$
            These are basic rules for "simplifying" series, which are going to be quite useful for you. If you are familiar with integration, you can perform exactly these manipulations if you replace the $sum$ with $int$, and the sequences with functions. If you are not familiar with integration, ignore this comment for now, but maybe keep it in the back of your mind for later.
            beginalign
            sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1 + 13^n
            &= sum_n=1^infty left[ 2 left( frac23 right)^n + left( frac13 right)^n right] && (textby application of (2)) \
            &= 2sum_n=1^infty left( frac23 right)^n + sum_n=1^infty left( frac13 right)^n && (textsimplify the series) \
            &= 2 cdot fracfrac231-frac23 + fracfrac131- frac13 && (textby application of (1)) \
            &= 2 cdot fracfrac231-frac23cdot frac33 + fracfrac131- frac13cdot frac33 && (textsilly, pedantic arithmetic) \
            &= 2 cdot frac23-2 + frac13-1 && (textmore pedantic arithmetic) \
            &= frac41 + frac12 && (textand some more) \
            &= frac8+12 && (textalmost there) \
            &= frac92. && (textdone!)
            endalign






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              IT looks very understandable now, I jotted down my own version on a piece of paper here at my desk. My worries and further question is more about the justification of splitting the Series into two separate series... Doesn't there have to be the assumption such that the combined original series has to be convergent to begin with before manipulating? $ sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:31










            • $begingroup$
              EDIT I just wanted to ask for sure, because I don't want to do silly mistakes with the infinite series... I still have a bad taste in my own mouth after having watched the numberphile video about summing divergent infinite series into each other (the video can be found on youtube with "1+2+3... = -1/12")
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              The justification kind of comes in through the back door. If $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ are convergent, then $sum (a_n + b_n)$ converges, and $sum (a_n + b_n) = sum a_n + sum b_n$. In the argument above, we break up a series of the form $sum (a_n + b_n)$ into two different convergent series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$, then use the fact that both of these converge in order to show that the original series converges.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:39










            • $begingroup$
              On the other hand, if all you need to know is that the original series converges (and this might assuage your conscience regarding this assumption), you might note that $2^n+1 + 1 < 2^n+2$ for all $n$, and $sum frac2^n+23^n$ is a convergent geometric series. But then $$ 0 < sum frac2^n+1+13^n le sum frac2^n+23^n < infty, $$ which demonstrates that the original series does, in fact, converge.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:43















            1












            $begingroup$

            After 20 years, I still have to rederive the identity
            $$ sum_n=1^infty alpha^n = fracalpha1-alpha tag1$$
            whenever I need it. Since it isn't that difficult, perhaps we should do that first.



            Suppose that $|alpha| < 1$, and let
            $$ S_k := sum_n=1^k alpha^k = alpha + alpha^2 + dotsb + alpha^k $$
            be the $k$-th partial sum. Then
            $$ alpha S_k = sum_n=1^k alpha^k+1 = alpha^2 + alpha^3 + dotsb + alpha^k+1. $$
            Subtracting, we obtain
            beginalign
            (1-alpha) S_k
            &= S_k - alpha S_k \
            &= left( alpha + alpha^2 + dotsb + alpha^k right) - left( alpha^2 + alpha^3 + dotsb + alpha^k+1 right) \
            &= alpha + left( alpha^2 - alpha^2right) + left( alpha^3 - alpha^3right) + dotsb + left(alpha^k - alpha^kright) - alpha^k+1 \
            &= alpha - alpha^k+1.
            endalign
            Solving for $S_k$, we get
            $$ S_k = fracalpha - alpha^k+11-alpha. $$
            Since $|alpha| < 1$, it follows that $lim_ktoinfty alpha^k+1 = 0$, and so
            $$
            sum_n=1^infty alpha^n
            := lim_kto infty sum_n=1^k alpha^n
            = lim_ktoinfty fracalpha - alpha^k+11-alpha
            = fracalpha1-alpha.
            $$
            But this is exactly the identity at (1). Huzzah!




            Now, how do we use this here?



            Observe that
            $$ frac2^n+1 + 13^n
            = frac2^n+13^n + frac13^n
            = 2 left( frac23 right)^n + left( frac13 right)^n.
            tag2$$
            But series are linear, and so play nice with addition and multiplication. Specifically, if $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ converge, and $C$ is any constant, then we have
            $$ sum_n=1^infty left[ a_n + b_n right] = sum_n=1^infty a_n + sum_n=1^infty b_n
            qquadtextandqquad
            sum_n=1^infty Ca_n = C sum_n=1^infty a_n. $$
            These are basic rules for "simplifying" series, which are going to be quite useful for you. If you are familiar with integration, you can perform exactly these manipulations if you replace the $sum$ with $int$, and the sequences with functions. If you are not familiar with integration, ignore this comment for now, but maybe keep it in the back of your mind for later.
            beginalign
            sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1 + 13^n
            &= sum_n=1^infty left[ 2 left( frac23 right)^n + left( frac13 right)^n right] && (textby application of (2)) \
            &= 2sum_n=1^infty left( frac23 right)^n + sum_n=1^infty left( frac13 right)^n && (textsimplify the series) \
            &= 2 cdot fracfrac231-frac23 + fracfrac131- frac13 && (textby application of (1)) \
            &= 2 cdot fracfrac231-frac23cdot frac33 + fracfrac131- frac13cdot frac33 && (textsilly, pedantic arithmetic) \
            &= 2 cdot frac23-2 + frac13-1 && (textmore pedantic arithmetic) \
            &= frac41 + frac12 && (textand some more) \
            &= frac8+12 && (textalmost there) \
            &= frac92. && (textdone!)
            endalign






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              IT looks very understandable now, I jotted down my own version on a piece of paper here at my desk. My worries and further question is more about the justification of splitting the Series into two separate series... Doesn't there have to be the assumption such that the combined original series has to be convergent to begin with before manipulating? $ sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:31










            • $begingroup$
              EDIT I just wanted to ask for sure, because I don't want to do silly mistakes with the infinite series... I still have a bad taste in my own mouth after having watched the numberphile video about summing divergent infinite series into each other (the video can be found on youtube with "1+2+3... = -1/12")
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              The justification kind of comes in through the back door. If $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ are convergent, then $sum (a_n + b_n)$ converges, and $sum (a_n + b_n) = sum a_n + sum b_n$. In the argument above, we break up a series of the form $sum (a_n + b_n)$ into two different convergent series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$, then use the fact that both of these converge in order to show that the original series converges.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:39










            • $begingroup$
              On the other hand, if all you need to know is that the original series converges (and this might assuage your conscience regarding this assumption), you might note that $2^n+1 + 1 < 2^n+2$ for all $n$, and $sum frac2^n+23^n$ is a convergent geometric series. But then $$ 0 < sum frac2^n+1+13^n le sum frac2^n+23^n < infty, $$ which demonstrates that the original series does, in fact, converge.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:43













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            After 20 years, I still have to rederive the identity
            $$ sum_n=1^infty alpha^n = fracalpha1-alpha tag1$$
            whenever I need it. Since it isn't that difficult, perhaps we should do that first.



            Suppose that $|alpha| < 1$, and let
            $$ S_k := sum_n=1^k alpha^k = alpha + alpha^2 + dotsb + alpha^k $$
            be the $k$-th partial sum. Then
            $$ alpha S_k = sum_n=1^k alpha^k+1 = alpha^2 + alpha^3 + dotsb + alpha^k+1. $$
            Subtracting, we obtain
            beginalign
            (1-alpha) S_k
            &= S_k - alpha S_k \
            &= left( alpha + alpha^2 + dotsb + alpha^k right) - left( alpha^2 + alpha^3 + dotsb + alpha^k+1 right) \
            &= alpha + left( alpha^2 - alpha^2right) + left( alpha^3 - alpha^3right) + dotsb + left(alpha^k - alpha^kright) - alpha^k+1 \
            &= alpha - alpha^k+1.
            endalign
            Solving for $S_k$, we get
            $$ S_k = fracalpha - alpha^k+11-alpha. $$
            Since $|alpha| < 1$, it follows that $lim_ktoinfty alpha^k+1 = 0$, and so
            $$
            sum_n=1^infty alpha^n
            := lim_kto infty sum_n=1^k alpha^n
            = lim_ktoinfty fracalpha - alpha^k+11-alpha
            = fracalpha1-alpha.
            $$
            But this is exactly the identity at (1). Huzzah!




            Now, how do we use this here?



            Observe that
            $$ frac2^n+1 + 13^n
            = frac2^n+13^n + frac13^n
            = 2 left( frac23 right)^n + left( frac13 right)^n.
            tag2$$
            But series are linear, and so play nice with addition and multiplication. Specifically, if $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ converge, and $C$ is any constant, then we have
            $$ sum_n=1^infty left[ a_n + b_n right] = sum_n=1^infty a_n + sum_n=1^infty b_n
            qquadtextandqquad
            sum_n=1^infty Ca_n = C sum_n=1^infty a_n. $$
            These are basic rules for "simplifying" series, which are going to be quite useful for you. If you are familiar with integration, you can perform exactly these manipulations if you replace the $sum$ with $int$, and the sequences with functions. If you are not familiar with integration, ignore this comment for now, but maybe keep it in the back of your mind for later.
            beginalign
            sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1 + 13^n
            &= sum_n=1^infty left[ 2 left( frac23 right)^n + left( frac13 right)^n right] && (textby application of (2)) \
            &= 2sum_n=1^infty left( frac23 right)^n + sum_n=1^infty left( frac13 right)^n && (textsimplify the series) \
            &= 2 cdot fracfrac231-frac23 + fracfrac131- frac13 && (textby application of (1)) \
            &= 2 cdot fracfrac231-frac23cdot frac33 + fracfrac131- frac13cdot frac33 && (textsilly, pedantic arithmetic) \
            &= 2 cdot frac23-2 + frac13-1 && (textmore pedantic arithmetic) \
            &= frac41 + frac12 && (textand some more) \
            &= frac8+12 && (textalmost there) \
            &= frac92. && (textdone!)
            endalign






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            After 20 years, I still have to rederive the identity
            $$ sum_n=1^infty alpha^n = fracalpha1-alpha tag1$$
            whenever I need it. Since it isn't that difficult, perhaps we should do that first.



            Suppose that $|alpha| < 1$, and let
            $$ S_k := sum_n=1^k alpha^k = alpha + alpha^2 + dotsb + alpha^k $$
            be the $k$-th partial sum. Then
            $$ alpha S_k = sum_n=1^k alpha^k+1 = alpha^2 + alpha^3 + dotsb + alpha^k+1. $$
            Subtracting, we obtain
            beginalign
            (1-alpha) S_k
            &= S_k - alpha S_k \
            &= left( alpha + alpha^2 + dotsb + alpha^k right) - left( alpha^2 + alpha^3 + dotsb + alpha^k+1 right) \
            &= alpha + left( alpha^2 - alpha^2right) + left( alpha^3 - alpha^3right) + dotsb + left(alpha^k - alpha^kright) - alpha^k+1 \
            &= alpha - alpha^k+1.
            endalign
            Solving for $S_k$, we get
            $$ S_k = fracalpha - alpha^k+11-alpha. $$
            Since $|alpha| < 1$, it follows that $lim_ktoinfty alpha^k+1 = 0$, and so
            $$
            sum_n=1^infty alpha^n
            := lim_kto infty sum_n=1^k alpha^n
            = lim_ktoinfty fracalpha - alpha^k+11-alpha
            = fracalpha1-alpha.
            $$
            But this is exactly the identity at (1). Huzzah!




            Now, how do we use this here?



            Observe that
            $$ frac2^n+1 + 13^n
            = frac2^n+13^n + frac13^n
            = 2 left( frac23 right)^n + left( frac13 right)^n.
            tag2$$
            But series are linear, and so play nice with addition and multiplication. Specifically, if $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ converge, and $C$ is any constant, then we have
            $$ sum_n=1^infty left[ a_n + b_n right] = sum_n=1^infty a_n + sum_n=1^infty b_n
            qquadtextandqquad
            sum_n=1^infty Ca_n = C sum_n=1^infty a_n. $$
            These are basic rules for "simplifying" series, which are going to be quite useful for you. If you are familiar with integration, you can perform exactly these manipulations if you replace the $sum$ with $int$, and the sequences with functions. If you are not familiar with integration, ignore this comment for now, but maybe keep it in the back of your mind for later.
            beginalign
            sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1 + 13^n
            &= sum_n=1^infty left[ 2 left( frac23 right)^n + left( frac13 right)^n right] && (textby application of (2)) \
            &= 2sum_n=1^infty left( frac23 right)^n + sum_n=1^infty left( frac13 right)^n && (textsimplify the series) \
            &= 2 cdot fracfrac231-frac23 + fracfrac131- frac13 && (textby application of (1)) \
            &= 2 cdot fracfrac231-frac23cdot frac33 + fracfrac131- frac13cdot frac33 && (textsilly, pedantic arithmetic) \
            &= 2 cdot frac23-2 + frac13-1 && (textmore pedantic arithmetic) \
            &= frac41 + frac12 && (textand some more) \
            &= frac8+12 && (textalmost there) \
            &= frac92. && (textdone!)
            endalign







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 25 '18 at 16:18

























            answered Jan 25 '18 at 16:02









            Xander HendersonXander Henderson

            14.9k103555




            14.9k103555











            • $begingroup$
              IT looks very understandable now, I jotted down my own version on a piece of paper here at my desk. My worries and further question is more about the justification of splitting the Series into two separate series... Doesn't there have to be the assumption such that the combined original series has to be convergent to begin with before manipulating? $ sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:31










            • $begingroup$
              EDIT I just wanted to ask for sure, because I don't want to do silly mistakes with the infinite series... I still have a bad taste in my own mouth after having watched the numberphile video about summing divergent infinite series into each other (the video can be found on youtube with "1+2+3... = -1/12")
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              The justification kind of comes in through the back door. If $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ are convergent, then $sum (a_n + b_n)$ converges, and $sum (a_n + b_n) = sum a_n + sum b_n$. In the argument above, we break up a series of the form $sum (a_n + b_n)$ into two different convergent series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$, then use the fact that both of these converge in order to show that the original series converges.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:39










            • $begingroup$
              On the other hand, if all you need to know is that the original series converges (and this might assuage your conscience regarding this assumption), you might note that $2^n+1 + 1 < 2^n+2$ for all $n$, and $sum frac2^n+23^n$ is a convergent geometric series. But then $$ 0 < sum frac2^n+1+13^n le sum frac2^n+23^n < infty, $$ which demonstrates that the original series does, in fact, converge.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:43
















            • $begingroup$
              IT looks very understandable now, I jotted down my own version on a piece of paper here at my desk. My worries and further question is more about the justification of splitting the Series into two separate series... Doesn't there have to be the assumption such that the combined original series has to be convergent to begin with before manipulating? $ sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:31










            • $begingroup$
              EDIT I just wanted to ask for sure, because I don't want to do silly mistakes with the infinite series... I still have a bad taste in my own mouth after having watched the numberphile video about summing divergent infinite series into each other (the video can be found on youtube with "1+2+3... = -1/12")
              $endgroup$
              – Late347
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              The justification kind of comes in through the back door. If $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ are convergent, then $sum (a_n + b_n)$ converges, and $sum (a_n + b_n) = sum a_n + sum b_n$. In the argument above, we break up a series of the form $sum (a_n + b_n)$ into two different convergent series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$, then use the fact that both of these converge in order to show that the original series converges.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:39










            • $begingroup$
              On the other hand, if all you need to know is that the original series converges (and this might assuage your conscience regarding this assumption), you might note that $2^n+1 + 1 < 2^n+2$ for all $n$, and $sum frac2^n+23^n$ is a convergent geometric series. But then $$ 0 < sum frac2^n+1+13^n le sum frac2^n+23^n < infty, $$ which demonstrates that the original series does, in fact, converge.
              $endgroup$
              – Xander Henderson
              Jan 25 '18 at 16:43















            $begingroup$
            IT looks very understandable now, I jotted down my own version on a piece of paper here at my desk. My worries and further question is more about the justification of splitting the Series into two separate series... Doesn't there have to be the assumption such that the combined original series has to be convergent to begin with before manipulating? $ sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$
            $endgroup$
            – Late347
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:31




            $begingroup$
            IT looks very understandable now, I jotted down my own version on a piece of paper here at my desk. My worries and further question is more about the justification of splitting the Series into two separate series... Doesn't there have to be the assumption such that the combined original series has to be convergent to begin with before manipulating? $ sum_n=1^infty frac2^n+1+13^n$
            $endgroup$
            – Late347
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:31












            $begingroup$
            EDIT I just wanted to ask for sure, because I don't want to do silly mistakes with the infinite series... I still have a bad taste in my own mouth after having watched the numberphile video about summing divergent infinite series into each other (the video can be found on youtube with "1+2+3... = -1/12")
            $endgroup$
            – Late347
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:33




            $begingroup$
            EDIT I just wanted to ask for sure, because I don't want to do silly mistakes with the infinite series... I still have a bad taste in my own mouth after having watched the numberphile video about summing divergent infinite series into each other (the video can be found on youtube with "1+2+3... = -1/12")
            $endgroup$
            – Late347
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:33












            $begingroup$
            The justification kind of comes in through the back door. If $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ are convergent, then $sum (a_n + b_n)$ converges, and $sum (a_n + b_n) = sum a_n + sum b_n$. In the argument above, we break up a series of the form $sum (a_n + b_n)$ into two different convergent series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$, then use the fact that both of these converge in order to show that the original series converges.
            $endgroup$
            – Xander Henderson
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:39




            $begingroup$
            The justification kind of comes in through the back door. If $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ are convergent, then $sum (a_n + b_n)$ converges, and $sum (a_n + b_n) = sum a_n + sum b_n$. In the argument above, we break up a series of the form $sum (a_n + b_n)$ into two different convergent series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$, then use the fact that both of these converge in order to show that the original series converges.
            $endgroup$
            – Xander Henderson
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:39












            $begingroup$
            On the other hand, if all you need to know is that the original series converges (and this might assuage your conscience regarding this assumption), you might note that $2^n+1 + 1 < 2^n+2$ for all $n$, and $sum frac2^n+23^n$ is a convergent geometric series. But then $$ 0 < sum frac2^n+1+13^n le sum frac2^n+23^n < infty, $$ which demonstrates that the original series does, in fact, converge.
            $endgroup$
            – Xander Henderson
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:43




            $begingroup$
            On the other hand, if all you need to know is that the original series converges (and this might assuage your conscience regarding this assumption), you might note that $2^n+1 + 1 < 2^n+2$ for all $n$, and $sum frac2^n+23^n$ is a convergent geometric series. But then $$ 0 < sum frac2^n+1+13^n le sum frac2^n+23^n < infty, $$ which demonstrates that the original series does, in fact, converge.
            $endgroup$
            – Xander Henderson
            Jan 25 '18 at 16:43











            0












            $begingroup$

            You can split the sum and use



            $$sum_n=1^infty r^n=fracr1-r$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              You can split the sum and use



              $$sum_n=1^infty r^n=fracr1-r$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                You can split the sum and use



                $$sum_n=1^infty r^n=fracr1-r$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                You can split the sum and use



                $$sum_n=1^infty r^n=fracr1-r$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 25 '18 at 15:46









                gimusigimusi

                93.1k84594




                93.1k84594



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2620771%2fhelp-with-sum-of-infinite-series-stuck-in-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                    Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                    Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ