Lipschitz constant of the exponential map The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDifference between parallel transport and derivative of the exponential mapRelation between exponential map and parallel transportRelation between geodesics and exponential map for Lie groups(locally) “almost convex” property of the distance function in a general Riemannian manifoldLine in product mainifoldCompute distance induced by riemannian metricCovariant derivative of inverse exponential vector fieldHow to use Klingenberg's Lemma to prove Hadamard's theoremKilling field and flow commuting with exponentielLipschitz constant of inner product

Any way to transfer all permissions from one role to another?

How to start emacs in "nothing" mode (`fundamental-mode`)

Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?

Return the Closest Prime Number

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?

Horror movie/show or scene where a horse creature opens its mouth really wide and devours a man in a stables

If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?

What makes a siege story/plot interesting?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?

How do I construct this japanese bowl?

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?

Rotate a column

What size rim is OK?

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

% symbol leads to superlong (forever?) compilations

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

Why here is plural "We went to the movies last night."

Grabbing quick drinks

A pseudo-riley?

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?



Lipschitz constant of the exponential map



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDifference between parallel transport and derivative of the exponential mapRelation between exponential map and parallel transportRelation between geodesics and exponential map for Lie groups(locally) “almost convex” property of the distance function in a general Riemannian manifoldLine in product mainifoldCompute distance induced by riemannian metricCovariant derivative of inverse exponential vector fieldHow to use Klingenberg's Lemma to prove Hadamard's theoremKilling field and flow commuting with exponentielLipschitz constant of inner product










5












$begingroup$


Let $M$ be a smooth Riemannian manifold and let $p in M$. Suppose $r ll textinj(p)$ (the injectivity radius at $p$) and fix $t in (0,r)$ then define the map
$$ T_pM ni v mapsto exp_p(tv) in M$$
I know this map is a diffeomorphism. How can I estimate its Lipschitz constant?



If I take $v_1, v_2 in T_pM$ and I consider the geodesics $gamma_1$ and $gamma_2$ starting at $p$ with initial speed $v_1$ and $v_2$ respectively, it would be enough to prove
$$ fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t)) le |v_2-v_1| $$
to conclude that the Lipschitz constant is bounded by $t$. But even if I consider the differential of the distance given by
$$ fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t))= langle dotalpha_t(d_0), dotgamma_2(t) rangle - langle dotalpha_t(0), dotgamma_1(t) rangle $$
where $d_0 = (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t))$ and $alpha_t$ is a unit speed geodesic connecting $gamma_1(t)$ to $gamma_2(t)$, I only obtain
beginalign*
fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t)) & = langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)], v_2 rangle - langle mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle \
& = langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)] , v_2 rangle -langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)], v_1 rangle + langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)]-mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle \
& le |v_2-v_1| + langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)]-mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle
endalign*

where $mathcalP^gamma_t_0 to t_1[v]$ is the parallel transport of $v in T_gamma(t_0)$from $gamma(t_0)$ to $gamma(t_1)$ along $gamma$.



It is clear to me that the second summand must go to $0$ as $t to 0^+$ and this would imply the result for small $t$. But I have not idea of how to prove that!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What is $mathrminj(x)$? Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ortiz
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is the infectivity radius at $x$. Basically I am only considering a neighborhood of $0_p in T_pM$ where the exponential map is a diffeomorphism onto some open neighborhood of $p$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bremen000
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, as long as you assume an upper sectional curvature bound. This essentially is the content of Rauch Comparison Theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have never heard about this result, could you please expand your comment?
    $endgroup$
    – Bremen000
    2 hours ago















5












$begingroup$


Let $M$ be a smooth Riemannian manifold and let $p in M$. Suppose $r ll textinj(p)$ (the injectivity radius at $p$) and fix $t in (0,r)$ then define the map
$$ T_pM ni v mapsto exp_p(tv) in M$$
I know this map is a diffeomorphism. How can I estimate its Lipschitz constant?



If I take $v_1, v_2 in T_pM$ and I consider the geodesics $gamma_1$ and $gamma_2$ starting at $p$ with initial speed $v_1$ and $v_2$ respectively, it would be enough to prove
$$ fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t)) le |v_2-v_1| $$
to conclude that the Lipschitz constant is bounded by $t$. But even if I consider the differential of the distance given by
$$ fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t))= langle dotalpha_t(d_0), dotgamma_2(t) rangle - langle dotalpha_t(0), dotgamma_1(t) rangle $$
where $d_0 = (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t))$ and $alpha_t$ is a unit speed geodesic connecting $gamma_1(t)$ to $gamma_2(t)$, I only obtain
beginalign*
fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t)) & = langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)], v_2 rangle - langle mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle \
& = langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)] , v_2 rangle -langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)], v_1 rangle + langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)]-mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle \
& le |v_2-v_1| + langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)]-mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle
endalign*

where $mathcalP^gamma_t_0 to t_1[v]$ is the parallel transport of $v in T_gamma(t_0)$from $gamma(t_0)$ to $gamma(t_1)$ along $gamma$.



It is clear to me that the second summand must go to $0$ as $t to 0^+$ and this would imply the result for small $t$. But I have not idea of how to prove that!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What is $mathrminj(x)$? Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ortiz
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is the infectivity radius at $x$. Basically I am only considering a neighborhood of $0_p in T_pM$ where the exponential map is a diffeomorphism onto some open neighborhood of $p$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bremen000
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, as long as you assume an upper sectional curvature bound. This essentially is the content of Rauch Comparison Theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have never heard about this result, could you please expand your comment?
    $endgroup$
    – Bremen000
    2 hours ago













5












5








5


3



$begingroup$


Let $M$ be a smooth Riemannian manifold and let $p in M$. Suppose $r ll textinj(p)$ (the injectivity radius at $p$) and fix $t in (0,r)$ then define the map
$$ T_pM ni v mapsto exp_p(tv) in M$$
I know this map is a diffeomorphism. How can I estimate its Lipschitz constant?



If I take $v_1, v_2 in T_pM$ and I consider the geodesics $gamma_1$ and $gamma_2$ starting at $p$ with initial speed $v_1$ and $v_2$ respectively, it would be enough to prove
$$ fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t)) le |v_2-v_1| $$
to conclude that the Lipschitz constant is bounded by $t$. But even if I consider the differential of the distance given by
$$ fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t))= langle dotalpha_t(d_0), dotgamma_2(t) rangle - langle dotalpha_t(0), dotgamma_1(t) rangle $$
where $d_0 = (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t))$ and $alpha_t$ is a unit speed geodesic connecting $gamma_1(t)$ to $gamma_2(t)$, I only obtain
beginalign*
fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t)) & = langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)], v_2 rangle - langle mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle \
& = langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)] , v_2 rangle -langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)], v_1 rangle + langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)]-mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle \
& le |v_2-v_1| + langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)]-mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle
endalign*

where $mathcalP^gamma_t_0 to t_1[v]$ is the parallel transport of $v in T_gamma(t_0)$from $gamma(t_0)$ to $gamma(t_1)$ along $gamma$.



It is clear to me that the second summand must go to $0$ as $t to 0^+$ and this would imply the result for small $t$. But I have not idea of how to prove that!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $M$ be a smooth Riemannian manifold and let $p in M$. Suppose $r ll textinj(p)$ (the injectivity radius at $p$) and fix $t in (0,r)$ then define the map
$$ T_pM ni v mapsto exp_p(tv) in M$$
I know this map is a diffeomorphism. How can I estimate its Lipschitz constant?



If I take $v_1, v_2 in T_pM$ and I consider the geodesics $gamma_1$ and $gamma_2$ starting at $p$ with initial speed $v_1$ and $v_2$ respectively, it would be enough to prove
$$ fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t)) le |v_2-v_1| $$
to conclude that the Lipschitz constant is bounded by $t$. But even if I consider the differential of the distance given by
$$ fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t))= langle dotalpha_t(d_0), dotgamma_2(t) rangle - langle dotalpha_t(0), dotgamma_1(t) rangle $$
where $d_0 = (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t))$ and $alpha_t$ is a unit speed geodesic connecting $gamma_1(t)$ to $gamma_2(t)$, I only obtain
beginalign*
fracddt d (gamma_1(t), gamma_2(t)) & = langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)], v_2 rangle - langle mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle \
& = langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)] , v_2 rangle -langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)], v_1 rangle + langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)]-mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle \
& le |v_2-v_1| + langle mathcalP^gamma_2_t to 0[dotalpha_t(d_0)]-mathcalP^gamma_1_t to 0[dotalpha_t(0)], v_1 rangle
endalign*

where $mathcalP^gamma_t_0 to t_1[v]$ is the parallel transport of $v in T_gamma(t_0)$from $gamma(t_0)$ to $gamma(t_1)$ along $gamma$.



It is clear to me that the second summand must go to $0$ as $t to 0^+$ and this would imply the result for small $t$. But I have not idea of how to prove that!







riemannian-geometry lipschitz-functions geodesic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago







Bremen000

















asked yesterday









Bremen000Bremen000

510310




510310











  • $begingroup$
    What is $mathrminj(x)$? Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ortiz
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is the infectivity radius at $x$. Basically I am only considering a neighborhood of $0_p in T_pM$ where the exponential map is a diffeomorphism onto some open neighborhood of $p$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bremen000
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, as long as you assume an upper sectional curvature bound. This essentially is the content of Rauch Comparison Theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have never heard about this result, could you please expand your comment?
    $endgroup$
    – Bremen000
    2 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    What is $mathrminj(x)$? Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ortiz
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is the infectivity radius at $x$. Basically I am only considering a neighborhood of $0_p in T_pM$ where the exponential map is a diffeomorphism onto some open neighborhood of $p$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bremen000
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, as long as you assume an upper sectional curvature bound. This essentially is the content of Rauch Comparison Theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have never heard about this result, could you please expand your comment?
    $endgroup$
    – Bremen000
    2 hours ago















$begingroup$
What is $mathrminj(x)$? Thanks
$endgroup$
– Alex Ortiz
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
What is $mathrminj(x)$? Thanks
$endgroup$
– Alex Ortiz
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
It is the infectivity radius at $x$. Basically I am only considering a neighborhood of $0_p in T_pM$ where the exponential map is a diffeomorphism onto some open neighborhood of $p$.
$endgroup$
– Bremen000
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
It is the infectivity radius at $x$. Basically I am only considering a neighborhood of $0_p in T_pM$ where the exponential map is a diffeomorphism onto some open neighborhood of $p$.
$endgroup$
– Bremen000
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
Yes, as long as you assume an upper sectional curvature bound. This essentially is the content of Rauch Comparison Theorem.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yes, as long as you assume an upper sectional curvature bound. This essentially is the content of Rauch Comparison Theorem.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
I have never heard about this result, could you please expand your comment?
$endgroup$
– Bremen000
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
I have never heard about this result, could you please expand your comment?
$endgroup$
– Bremen000
2 hours ago










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164336%2flipschitz-constant-of-the-exponential-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164336%2flipschitz-constant-of-the-exponential-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ