category of semi-simple modules is not closed under extension?Deciding whether or not a class of modules is “big enough”$operatornameleft.fin.dim(A)=0$ if and only if $operatornamesoc(A_A)$ contains an isomorphic copy of every simple right $A$-moduleA question on Auslander-Bridger transposeThe Modules over Algebras over Operads are not what they seem.Wedderburn-Artin theorem for algebrasSimple Modules and IdealsSimple example of a non-split square zero extension of commutative algebras in characteristic 0?Proof of Jordan-Hölder for Modules carries over for Groups?Is the Auslander-Reiten translation, restricted to non-projective and non-injective modules, exact?Arithmetic functions on short exact sequences
Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleagues
Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm
Do sorcerers' subtle spells require a skill check to be unseen?
How does it work when somebody invests in my business?
Type int? vs type int
Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?
Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?
How do I extract a value from a time formatted value in excel?
How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?
How does Loki do this?
Purchasing a ticket for someone else in another country?
What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?
What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?
How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?
What does "I’d sit this one out, Cap," imply or mean in the context?
Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
Is exact Kanji stroke length important?
How does buying out courses with grant money work?
Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?
What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"
Avoiding estate tax by giving multiple gifts
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
How do I find the solutions of the following equation?
category of semi-simple modules is not closed under extension?
Deciding whether or not a class of modules is “big enough”$operatornameleft.fin.dim(A)=0$ if and only if $operatornamesoc(A_A)$ contains an isomorphic copy of every simple right $A$-moduleA question on Auslander-Bridger transposeThe Modules over Algebras over Operads are not what they seem.Wedderburn-Artin theorem for algebrasSimple Modules and IdealsSimple example of a non-split square zero extension of commutative algebras in characteristic 0?Proof of Jordan-Hölder for Modules carries over for Groups?Is the Auslander-Reiten translation, restricted to non-projective and non-injective modules, exact?Arithmetic functions on short exact sequences
$begingroup$
Let $R$ be a ring and $mathcalC$ be the category of left semi-simple $R-$modules.
$textbfQ:$ What is the example of $mathcalC$ is not closed under extension?(i.e. Given $A,B$ semi-simple modules, there is $X$ not a semi-simple module s.t. $0to Ato Cto Bto 0$ is $R$ left module exact sequence.) I have thought of $Z_6$ over $Z_6$. $Z_6cong Z_2times Z_3$. Now $0to Z_2to Z_2times Z_3to Z_3to 0$ is an extension of $Z_2,Z_3$ as $Z_6$ module. I do not see other obvious possible extensions.
Ref. Auslander, Reiten, Representation Theory of Artin Algebras.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let $R$ be a ring and $mathcalC$ be the category of left semi-simple $R-$modules.
$textbfQ:$ What is the example of $mathcalC$ is not closed under extension?(i.e. Given $A,B$ semi-simple modules, there is $X$ not a semi-simple module s.t. $0to Ato Cto Bto 0$ is $R$ left module exact sequence.) I have thought of $Z_6$ over $Z_6$. $Z_6cong Z_2times Z_3$. Now $0to Z_2to Z_2times Z_3to Z_3to 0$ is an extension of $Z_2,Z_3$ as $Z_6$ module. I do not see other obvious possible extensions.
Ref. Auslander, Reiten, Representation Theory of Artin Algebras.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What examples of not semi-simple modules do you know?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexB. That is the part that I have not seen so far. I knew some basic semi-simple rings as product of fields. Then modules over semi-simple rings are semi-simple. So I think I basically have no idea about non semi simples modules.
$endgroup$
– user45765
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
The case $R = mathbbZ$ is already instructive. Try figuring out what the simple and semisimple modules are.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan All simple modules over $Z$ are of form $Z/(p)$ with $p$ prime. Semi-simple ones are built up from products of $Z/(p)$. So I guess I could consider $0to (2)to Z/(4)to Z/(2)to 0$ where first arrow is by canonical injection and second arrow is by standard projection. Clearly $Z/(4)$ is not semi-simple or it will be $Z/(2)times Z/(2)$. Is this correct? So in order to look for not closed under extensions, one has to look for non-semi simple rings? Maybe this is dumb, are you implying over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan I think over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed by $Ext$ group applied to any module being 0 as every module is both projective and injective over semi-simple rings. So extensions are always trivial. So semi-simpleness is closed under extension.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let $R$ be a ring and $mathcalC$ be the category of left semi-simple $R-$modules.
$textbfQ:$ What is the example of $mathcalC$ is not closed under extension?(i.e. Given $A,B$ semi-simple modules, there is $X$ not a semi-simple module s.t. $0to Ato Cto Bto 0$ is $R$ left module exact sequence.) I have thought of $Z_6$ over $Z_6$. $Z_6cong Z_2times Z_3$. Now $0to Z_2to Z_2times Z_3to Z_3to 0$ is an extension of $Z_2,Z_3$ as $Z_6$ module. I do not see other obvious possible extensions.
Ref. Auslander, Reiten, Representation Theory of Artin Algebras.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
Let $R$ be a ring and $mathcalC$ be the category of left semi-simple $R-$modules.
$textbfQ:$ What is the example of $mathcalC$ is not closed under extension?(i.e. Given $A,B$ semi-simple modules, there is $X$ not a semi-simple module s.t. $0to Ato Cto Bto 0$ is $R$ left module exact sequence.) I have thought of $Z_6$ over $Z_6$. $Z_6cong Z_2times Z_3$. Now $0to Z_2to Z_2times Z_3to Z_3to 0$ is an extension of $Z_2,Z_3$ as $Z_6$ module. I do not see other obvious possible extensions.
Ref. Auslander, Reiten, Representation Theory of Artin Algebras.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
abstract-algebra ring-theory
asked 23 hours ago
user45765user45765
2,6792724
2,6792724
$begingroup$
What examples of not semi-simple modules do you know?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexB. That is the part that I have not seen so far. I knew some basic semi-simple rings as product of fields. Then modules over semi-simple rings are semi-simple. So I think I basically have no idea about non semi simples modules.
$endgroup$
– user45765
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
The case $R = mathbbZ$ is already instructive. Try figuring out what the simple and semisimple modules are.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan All simple modules over $Z$ are of form $Z/(p)$ with $p$ prime. Semi-simple ones are built up from products of $Z/(p)$. So I guess I could consider $0to (2)to Z/(4)to Z/(2)to 0$ where first arrow is by canonical injection and second arrow is by standard projection. Clearly $Z/(4)$ is not semi-simple or it will be $Z/(2)times Z/(2)$. Is this correct? So in order to look for not closed under extensions, one has to look for non-semi simple rings? Maybe this is dumb, are you implying over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan I think over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed by $Ext$ group applied to any module being 0 as every module is both projective and injective over semi-simple rings. So extensions are always trivial. So semi-simpleness is closed under extension.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
What examples of not semi-simple modules do you know?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexB. That is the part that I have not seen so far. I knew some basic semi-simple rings as product of fields. Then modules over semi-simple rings are semi-simple. So I think I basically have no idea about non semi simples modules.
$endgroup$
– user45765
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
The case $R = mathbbZ$ is already instructive. Try figuring out what the simple and semisimple modules are.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan All simple modules over $Z$ are of form $Z/(p)$ with $p$ prime. Semi-simple ones are built up from products of $Z/(p)$. So I guess I could consider $0to (2)to Z/(4)to Z/(2)to 0$ where first arrow is by canonical injection and second arrow is by standard projection. Clearly $Z/(4)$ is not semi-simple or it will be $Z/(2)times Z/(2)$. Is this correct? So in order to look for not closed under extensions, one has to look for non-semi simple rings? Maybe this is dumb, are you implying over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan I think over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed by $Ext$ group applied to any module being 0 as every module is both projective and injective over semi-simple rings. So extensions are always trivial. So semi-simpleness is closed under extension.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
What examples of not semi-simple modules do you know?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
What examples of not semi-simple modules do you know?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexB. That is the part that I have not seen so far. I knew some basic semi-simple rings as product of fields. Then modules over semi-simple rings are semi-simple. So I think I basically have no idea about non semi simples modules.
$endgroup$
– user45765
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexB. That is the part that I have not seen so far. I knew some basic semi-simple rings as product of fields. Then modules over semi-simple rings are semi-simple. So I think I basically have no idea about non semi simples modules.
$endgroup$
– user45765
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
The case $R = mathbbZ$ is already instructive. Try figuring out what the simple and semisimple modules are.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
The case $R = mathbbZ$ is already instructive. Try figuring out what the simple and semisimple modules are.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan All simple modules over $Z$ are of form $Z/(p)$ with $p$ prime. Semi-simple ones are built up from products of $Z/(p)$. So I guess I could consider $0to (2)to Z/(4)to Z/(2)to 0$ where first arrow is by canonical injection and second arrow is by standard projection. Clearly $Z/(4)$ is not semi-simple or it will be $Z/(2)times Z/(2)$. Is this correct? So in order to look for not closed under extensions, one has to look for non-semi simple rings? Maybe this is dumb, are you implying over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan All simple modules over $Z$ are of form $Z/(p)$ with $p$ prime. Semi-simple ones are built up from products of $Z/(p)$. So I guess I could consider $0to (2)to Z/(4)to Z/(2)to 0$ where first arrow is by canonical injection and second arrow is by standard projection. Clearly $Z/(4)$ is not semi-simple or it will be $Z/(2)times Z/(2)$. Is this correct? So in order to look for not closed under extensions, one has to look for non-semi simple rings? Maybe this is dumb, are you implying over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan I think over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed by $Ext$ group applied to any module being 0 as every module is both projective and injective over semi-simple rings. So extensions are always trivial. So semi-simpleness is closed under extension.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan I think over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed by $Ext$ group applied to any module being 0 as every module is both projective and injective over semi-simple rings. So extensions are always trivial. So semi-simpleness is closed under extension.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163942%2fcategory-of-semi-simple-modules-is-not-closed-under-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163942%2fcategory-of-semi-simple-modules-is-not-closed-under-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What examples of not semi-simple modules do you know?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexB. That is the part that I have not seen so far. I knew some basic semi-simple rings as product of fields. Then modules over semi-simple rings are semi-simple. So I think I basically have no idea about non semi simples modules.
$endgroup$
– user45765
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
The case $R = mathbbZ$ is already instructive. Try figuring out what the simple and semisimple modules are.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan All simple modules over $Z$ are of form $Z/(p)$ with $p$ prime. Semi-simple ones are built up from products of $Z/(p)$. So I guess I could consider $0to (2)to Z/(4)to Z/(2)to 0$ where first arrow is by canonical injection and second arrow is by standard projection. Clearly $Z/(4)$ is not semi-simple or it will be $Z/(2)times Z/(2)$. Is this correct? So in order to look for not closed under extensions, one has to look for non-semi simple rings? Maybe this is dumb, are you implying over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan I think over semi-simple rings, the extension property is closed by $Ext$ group applied to any module being 0 as every module is both projective and injective over semi-simple rings. So extensions are always trivial. So semi-simpleness is closed under extension.
$endgroup$
– user45765
9 hours ago