$X$ Banach, $u_n to u$ and $x^*_n xrightarroww^* x^*$ implie that $langle x^*_n, u_nrangle to langle x^*,urangle$. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InStrong and weak convergence in $ell^1$Hilbert Adjoint Operator from Riesz Representation Theorem - $T^*y=fracleftlangle y,Txrightrangle leftlangle z_0,z_0rightranglez_0$Notion of weak convergence on a normed space without inner productDensity and Pointwise convergence imply strong convergence for Bi-orthogonal system?$int_0^Tint_Ωlangle(u_ncdotnabla)w,u_nrangle dxdttoint_0^Tint_Ωlangle(ucdotnabla)w,urangle dxdt$ if $u_nto u$ weakly and stronglydistance to orthogonal space equals $|langle h,erangle|$[Looking for Confirmation](X,G) is a duality, then (X,G1) is also one iff G1 is dense in GIs $langle Ax,x ranglein overlineM$?$u_n$ converges weakly to $u$ $Leftrightarrow$ $u_n$ is bounded and $langle x^*, u_n rangle to langle x^*, u rangle$Let $H$ be a Hilbert space and $(u_n) subseteq H$ an orthogonal sequence. Show the functional $T(x) = sum_n langle x , u_n rangle$ is bounded.
Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid
What is a mixture ratio of propellant?
Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?
Inversion Puzzle
Poison Arrows Piercing damage reduced to 0, do you still get poisoned?
Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?
"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"
How can I create a character who can assume the widest possible range of creature sizes?
Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?
What is the best strategy for white in this position?
Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?
Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?
Polarization lost upon 2nd reflection?
Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Carnot-Caratheodory metric
I looked up a future colleague on linkedin before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?
Can we apply L'Hospital's rule where the derivative is not continuous?
Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?
Does duplicating a spell with wish count as casting that spell?
If Wish Duplicates Simulacrum, Are Existing Duplicates Destroyed?
On the insanity of kings as an argument against Monarchy
Should I write numbers in words or as symbols in this case?
$X$ Banach, $u_n to u$ and $x^*_n xrightarroww^* x^*$ implie that $langle x^*_n, u_nrangle to langle x^*,urangle$.
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InStrong and weak convergence in $ell^1$Hilbert Adjoint Operator from Riesz Representation Theorem - $T^*y=fracleftlangle y,Txrightrangle leftlangle z_0,z_0rightranglez_0$Notion of weak convergence on a normed space without inner productDensity and Pointwise convergence imply strong convergence for Bi-orthogonal system?$int_0^Tint_Ωlangle(u_ncdotnabla)w,u_nrangle dxdttoint_0^Tint_Ωlangle(ucdotnabla)w,urangle dxdt$ if $u_nto u$ weakly and stronglydistance to orthogonal space equals $|langle h,erangle|$[Looking for Confirmation](X,G) is a duality, then (X,G1) is also one iff G1 is dense in GIs $langle Ax,x ranglein overlineM$?$u_n$ converges weakly to $u$ $Leftrightarrow$ $u_n$ is bounded and $langle x^*, u_n rangle to langle x^*, u rangle$Let $H$ be a Hilbert space and $(u_n) subseteq H$ an orthogonal sequence. Show the functional $T(x) = sum_n langle x , u_n rangle$ is bounded.
$begingroup$
Exercise :
Let $X$ be a Banach space, $u_n to u$ and $x^*_n xrightarroww^* x^*$. Show that $langle x^*_n, u_nrangle to langle x^*,urangle$.
Attempt-Discussion :
I know that a sequence $x_n^* in X^*$ converges to $x^*$ provided that $x_n^*(u) to x^*(u)$ for all $u in X$. Knowing that the $w^*-$topology coincides the topology of pointwise convergence of linear functionals, this implies that $x_n^* xrightarroww^* x^*$.
Now, I know that the duality brackets given are essentialy the expression of the linear functional, aka : $u mapsto langle x^*, u rangle := x^*(u)$. So essentially, since we have haev that the pointwise convergence is coinciding, we essentialy need to prove that $x^*_n(u_n) to x^*(u)$ and I guess since we have the functional convergence, it boils down to $x^*(u_n) to x^*(u)$ ?
How would one work further to prove the convergence asked ?
Alternatively, we would be interested in showing that $|langle x^*_n, u_nrangle - langle x^*,urangle| < varepsilon$ but I think I am missing something in re-writting the expression by breaking it up to form an arbitrarily small inequality.
Any hints will be greatly appreciated.
functional-analysis banach-spaces weak-convergence dual-spaces weak-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Exercise :
Let $X$ be a Banach space, $u_n to u$ and $x^*_n xrightarroww^* x^*$. Show that $langle x^*_n, u_nrangle to langle x^*,urangle$.
Attempt-Discussion :
I know that a sequence $x_n^* in X^*$ converges to $x^*$ provided that $x_n^*(u) to x^*(u)$ for all $u in X$. Knowing that the $w^*-$topology coincides the topology of pointwise convergence of linear functionals, this implies that $x_n^* xrightarroww^* x^*$.
Now, I know that the duality brackets given are essentialy the expression of the linear functional, aka : $u mapsto langle x^*, u rangle := x^*(u)$. So essentially, since we have haev that the pointwise convergence is coinciding, we essentialy need to prove that $x^*_n(u_n) to x^*(u)$ and I guess since we have the functional convergence, it boils down to $x^*(u_n) to x^*(u)$ ?
How would one work further to prove the convergence asked ?
Alternatively, we would be interested in showing that $|langle x^*_n, u_nrangle - langle x^*,urangle| < varepsilon$ but I think I am missing something in re-writting the expression by breaking it up to form an arbitrarily small inequality.
Any hints will be greatly appreciated.
functional-analysis banach-spaces weak-convergence dual-spaces weak-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Exercise :
Let $X$ be a Banach space, $u_n to u$ and $x^*_n xrightarroww^* x^*$. Show that $langle x^*_n, u_nrangle to langle x^*,urangle$.
Attempt-Discussion :
I know that a sequence $x_n^* in X^*$ converges to $x^*$ provided that $x_n^*(u) to x^*(u)$ for all $u in X$. Knowing that the $w^*-$topology coincides the topology of pointwise convergence of linear functionals, this implies that $x_n^* xrightarroww^* x^*$.
Now, I know that the duality brackets given are essentialy the expression of the linear functional, aka : $u mapsto langle x^*, u rangle := x^*(u)$. So essentially, since we have haev that the pointwise convergence is coinciding, we essentialy need to prove that $x^*_n(u_n) to x^*(u)$ and I guess since we have the functional convergence, it boils down to $x^*(u_n) to x^*(u)$ ?
How would one work further to prove the convergence asked ?
Alternatively, we would be interested in showing that $|langle x^*_n, u_nrangle - langle x^*,urangle| < varepsilon$ but I think I am missing something in re-writting the expression by breaking it up to form an arbitrarily small inequality.
Any hints will be greatly appreciated.
functional-analysis banach-spaces weak-convergence dual-spaces weak-topology
$endgroup$
Exercise :
Let $X$ be a Banach space, $u_n to u$ and $x^*_n xrightarroww^* x^*$. Show that $langle x^*_n, u_nrangle to langle x^*,urangle$.
Attempt-Discussion :
I know that a sequence $x_n^* in X^*$ converges to $x^*$ provided that $x_n^*(u) to x^*(u)$ for all $u in X$. Knowing that the $w^*-$topology coincides the topology of pointwise convergence of linear functionals, this implies that $x_n^* xrightarroww^* x^*$.
Now, I know that the duality brackets given are essentialy the expression of the linear functional, aka : $u mapsto langle x^*, u rangle := x^*(u)$. So essentially, since we have haev that the pointwise convergence is coinciding, we essentialy need to prove that $x^*_n(u_n) to x^*(u)$ and I guess since we have the functional convergence, it boils down to $x^*(u_n) to x^*(u)$ ?
How would one work further to prove the convergence asked ?
Alternatively, we would be interested in showing that $|langle x^*_n, u_nrangle - langle x^*,urangle| < varepsilon$ but I think I am missing something in re-writting the expression by breaking it up to form an arbitrarily small inequality.
Any hints will be greatly appreciated.
functional-analysis banach-spaces weak-convergence dual-spaces weak-topology
functional-analysis banach-spaces weak-convergence dual-spaces weak-topology
asked Mar 30 at 10:20
RebellosRebellos
15.7k31250
15.7k31250
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that by the Banach-Steinhaus theorem $sup_n|x_n^*|<infty$. We find
$$lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_nrangle-langle x^*,urangle|=lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_n-urangle+langle x_n^*,urangle-langle x^*,urangle|$$
$$leqlim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_n-urangle|+|langle x_n^*-x^*,urangle|leq lim_nrightarrowinfty|x_n^*||u_n-u|+lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*-x^*,urangle|=0$$
as $x_n^*stackrelw^*rightarrowx^*$, $u_nrightarrow u$ and $(|x_n^*|)$ is bounded.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168122%2fx-banach-u-n-to-u-and-x-n-xrightarroww-x-implie-that-langle-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that by the Banach-Steinhaus theorem $sup_n|x_n^*|<infty$. We find
$$lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_nrangle-langle x^*,urangle|=lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_n-urangle+langle x_n^*,urangle-langle x^*,urangle|$$
$$leqlim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_n-urangle|+|langle x_n^*-x^*,urangle|leq lim_nrightarrowinfty|x_n^*||u_n-u|+lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*-x^*,urangle|=0$$
as $x_n^*stackrelw^*rightarrowx^*$, $u_nrightarrow u$ and $(|x_n^*|)$ is bounded.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that by the Banach-Steinhaus theorem $sup_n|x_n^*|<infty$. We find
$$lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_nrangle-langle x^*,urangle|=lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_n-urangle+langle x_n^*,urangle-langle x^*,urangle|$$
$$leqlim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_n-urangle|+|langle x_n^*-x^*,urangle|leq lim_nrightarrowinfty|x_n^*||u_n-u|+lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*-x^*,urangle|=0$$
as $x_n^*stackrelw^*rightarrowx^*$, $u_nrightarrow u$ and $(|x_n^*|)$ is bounded.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that by the Banach-Steinhaus theorem $sup_n|x_n^*|<infty$. We find
$$lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_nrangle-langle x^*,urangle|=lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_n-urangle+langle x_n^*,urangle-langle x^*,urangle|$$
$$leqlim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_n-urangle|+|langle x_n^*-x^*,urangle|leq lim_nrightarrowinfty|x_n^*||u_n-u|+lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*-x^*,urangle|=0$$
as $x_n^*stackrelw^*rightarrowx^*$, $u_nrightarrow u$ and $(|x_n^*|)$ is bounded.
$endgroup$
Note that by the Banach-Steinhaus theorem $sup_n|x_n^*|<infty$. We find
$$lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_nrangle-langle x^*,urangle|=lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_n-urangle+langle x_n^*,urangle-langle x^*,urangle|$$
$$leqlim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*,u_n-urangle|+|langle x_n^*-x^*,urangle|leq lim_nrightarrowinfty|x_n^*||u_n-u|+lim_nrightarrowinfty|langle x_n^*-x^*,urangle|=0$$
as $x_n^*stackrelw^*rightarrowx^*$, $u_nrightarrow u$ and $(|x_n^*|)$ is bounded.
answered Mar 30 at 10:54
Floris ClaassensFloris Claassens
1,36329
1,36329
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168122%2fx-banach-u-n-to-u-and-x-n-xrightarroww-x-implie-that-langle-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown