Existence and Uniqueness Theorems for First-Order ODE's The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InA version of existence and uniqueness of solution for an initival value problem of ODEElementary Proof Involving Wronskian and Existence and Uniquenessguarantee existence but not uniquenessExistence And Uniqueness Theorem QuestionODE) Uniqueness-Existence ProblemWhy do the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem and The Principle of Superposition not contradict each other?Using the uniqueness theorem for differential equations without initial value?“Existence and Uniqueness” Theorems for first order IVP: two or just one?Existence and uniqueness of solutionQuestion regarding Existence and Uniqueness of a Differential Equation
Geography at the pixel level
How come people say “Would of”?
The difference between dialogue marks
What is the best strategy for white in this position?
A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky
Springs with some finite mass
Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?
Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?
Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium
Carnot-Caratheodory metric
What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?
Why did Howard Stark use all the Vibranium they had on a prototype shield?
Understanding the implication of what "well-defined" means for the operation in quotient group
Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?
Monty Hall variation
What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?
Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
Inversion Puzzle
Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size
Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints
aging parents with no investments
I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
Existence and Uniqueness Theorems for First-Order ODE's
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InA version of existence and uniqueness of solution for an initival value problem of ODEElementary Proof Involving Wronskian and Existence and Uniquenessguarantee existence but not uniquenessExistence And Uniqueness Theorem QuestionODE) Uniqueness-Existence ProblemWhy do the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem and The Principle of Superposition not contradict each other?Using the uniqueness theorem for differential equations without initial value?“Existence and Uniqueness” Theorems for first order IVP: two or just one?Existence and uniqueness of solutionQuestion regarding Existence and Uniqueness of a Differential Equation
$begingroup$
There is a theorem regarding the existence and uniqueness of solutions to first-order ODE's:
Thm.: Consider the initial value problem $y'=f(t,y)$, $y(t_0)=y_0$. Suppose $f$ and $frac∂f∂y$ are continuous on some open rectangle $(t, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d)$ containing the point $(t_0, y_0)$. Then in some interval $t_0-h, t_0+h)⊆(a, b)$, there exists a unique solution $y = g(t)$ that satisfies the initial value problem.
Now if we consider this example: $t^2 y'+2ty-y^3=0$, where $t>0$, the general solution is $y = ±sqrtfrac5t2+Ct^5$. But $y=0$ is also a solution and I am wondering whether the above theorem can help me find such solutions which are not contained in the family of general solutions.
So, dividing the whole equation by $t^2$ gives $y'=fracy^3t^2-frac2yt$. Let $f(t,y)=fracy^3t^2-frac2yt$, then $frac∂f∂y = frac3y^2t^2-frac2t$. As long as $t≠0$, then $f$ and $frac∂f∂y$ are continuous, so I don't understand why we cannot identify anything wrong with $y=0$ using this theorem. To my understanding, since the solution $y=0$ is not contained in the general solutions, it should violate the conditions stated in the theorem, so I am quite confused. Thank you very much for answering.
ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a theorem regarding the existence and uniqueness of solutions to first-order ODE's:
Thm.: Consider the initial value problem $y'=f(t,y)$, $y(t_0)=y_0$. Suppose $f$ and $frac∂f∂y$ are continuous on some open rectangle $(t, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d)$ containing the point $(t_0, y_0)$. Then in some interval $t_0-h, t_0+h)⊆(a, b)$, there exists a unique solution $y = g(t)$ that satisfies the initial value problem.
Now if we consider this example: $t^2 y'+2ty-y^3=0$, where $t>0$, the general solution is $y = ±sqrtfrac5t2+Ct^5$. But $y=0$ is also a solution and I am wondering whether the above theorem can help me find such solutions which are not contained in the family of general solutions.
So, dividing the whole equation by $t^2$ gives $y'=fracy^3t^2-frac2yt$. Let $f(t,y)=fracy^3t^2-frac2yt$, then $frac∂f∂y = frac3y^2t^2-frac2t$. As long as $t≠0$, then $f$ and $frac∂f∂y$ are continuous, so I don't understand why we cannot identify anything wrong with $y=0$ using this theorem. To my understanding, since the solution $y=0$ is not contained in the general solutions, it should violate the conditions stated in the theorem, so I am quite confused. Thank you very much for answering.
ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Robert Israel Thank you for your answer. In general, is there any way we can find such particular solutions (which are not covered by the general solution) without guessing? If they exist, are they always asymptotes? Or are they always the result of some parameters going to infinity?
$endgroup$
– John Lei
Sep 13 '17 at 3:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a theorem regarding the existence and uniqueness of solutions to first-order ODE's:
Thm.: Consider the initial value problem $y'=f(t,y)$, $y(t_0)=y_0$. Suppose $f$ and $frac∂f∂y$ are continuous on some open rectangle $(t, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d)$ containing the point $(t_0, y_0)$. Then in some interval $t_0-h, t_0+h)⊆(a, b)$, there exists a unique solution $y = g(t)$ that satisfies the initial value problem.
Now if we consider this example: $t^2 y'+2ty-y^3=0$, where $t>0$, the general solution is $y = ±sqrtfrac5t2+Ct^5$. But $y=0$ is also a solution and I am wondering whether the above theorem can help me find such solutions which are not contained in the family of general solutions.
So, dividing the whole equation by $t^2$ gives $y'=fracy^3t^2-frac2yt$. Let $f(t,y)=fracy^3t^2-frac2yt$, then $frac∂f∂y = frac3y^2t^2-frac2t$. As long as $t≠0$, then $f$ and $frac∂f∂y$ are continuous, so I don't understand why we cannot identify anything wrong with $y=0$ using this theorem. To my understanding, since the solution $y=0$ is not contained in the general solutions, it should violate the conditions stated in the theorem, so I am quite confused. Thank you very much for answering.
ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
There is a theorem regarding the existence and uniqueness of solutions to first-order ODE's:
Thm.: Consider the initial value problem $y'=f(t,y)$, $y(t_0)=y_0$. Suppose $f$ and $frac∂f∂y$ are continuous on some open rectangle $(t, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d)$ containing the point $(t_0, y_0)$. Then in some interval $t_0-h, t_0+h)⊆(a, b)$, there exists a unique solution $y = g(t)$ that satisfies the initial value problem.
Now if we consider this example: $t^2 y'+2ty-y^3=0$, where $t>0$, the general solution is $y = ±sqrtfrac5t2+Ct^5$. But $y=0$ is also a solution and I am wondering whether the above theorem can help me find such solutions which are not contained in the family of general solutions.
So, dividing the whole equation by $t^2$ gives $y'=fracy^3t^2-frac2yt$. Let $f(t,y)=fracy^3t^2-frac2yt$, then $frac∂f∂y = frac3y^2t^2-frac2t$. As long as $t≠0$, then $f$ and $frac∂f∂y$ are continuous, so I don't understand why we cannot identify anything wrong with $y=0$ using this theorem. To my understanding, since the solution $y=0$ is not contained in the general solutions, it should violate the conditions stated in the theorem, so I am quite confused. Thank you very much for answering.
ordinary-differential-equations
ordinary-differential-equations
edited Mar 30 at 15:23
LutzL
60.4k42057
60.4k42057
asked Sep 12 '17 at 19:43
John LeiJohn Lei
445
445
$begingroup$
@Robert Israel Thank you for your answer. In general, is there any way we can find such particular solutions (which are not covered by the general solution) without guessing? If they exist, are they always asymptotes? Or are they always the result of some parameters going to infinity?
$endgroup$
– John Lei
Sep 13 '17 at 3:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@Robert Israel Thank you for your answer. In general, is there any way we can find such particular solutions (which are not covered by the general solution) without guessing? If they exist, are they always asymptotes? Or are they always the result of some parameters going to infinity?
$endgroup$
– John Lei
Sep 13 '17 at 3:14
$begingroup$
@Robert Israel Thank you for your answer. In general, is there any way we can find such particular solutions (which are not covered by the general solution) without guessing? If they exist, are they always asymptotes? Or are they always the result of some parameters going to infinity?
$endgroup$
– John Lei
Sep 13 '17 at 3:14
$begingroup$
@Robert Israel Thank you for your answer. In general, is there any way we can find such particular solutions (which are not covered by the general solution) without guessing? If they exist, are they always asymptotes? Or are they always the result of some parameters going to infinity?
$endgroup$
– John Lei
Sep 13 '17 at 3:14
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It often happens that there are particular solutions that are not covered by the general solution, but may be a limit of the general solution as some parameter goes to $+infty$ or $-infty$. In this case taking $C to infty$ gives you $y=0$.
There is no violation of the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem here. If $t_0 > 0$ and $y_0 > 0$, there is a unique $C$ such that $y_0 = sqrtfrac5 t_02+C t_0^5$, and the unique solution with this initial condition is $y = sqrtfrac5 t2+C t^5$ with that $C$. Similarly for $y_0 < 0$ with
$y_0 = -sqrtfrac5 t_02+C t_0^5$. And for $y_0 = 0$, the unique solution is $y = 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2427049%2fexistence-and-uniqueness-theorems-for-first-order-odes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It often happens that there are particular solutions that are not covered by the general solution, but may be a limit of the general solution as some parameter goes to $+infty$ or $-infty$. In this case taking $C to infty$ gives you $y=0$.
There is no violation of the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem here. If $t_0 > 0$ and $y_0 > 0$, there is a unique $C$ such that $y_0 = sqrtfrac5 t_02+C t_0^5$, and the unique solution with this initial condition is $y = sqrtfrac5 t2+C t^5$ with that $C$. Similarly for $y_0 < 0$ with
$y_0 = -sqrtfrac5 t_02+C t_0^5$. And for $y_0 = 0$, the unique solution is $y = 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It often happens that there are particular solutions that are not covered by the general solution, but may be a limit of the general solution as some parameter goes to $+infty$ or $-infty$. In this case taking $C to infty$ gives you $y=0$.
There is no violation of the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem here. If $t_0 > 0$ and $y_0 > 0$, there is a unique $C$ such that $y_0 = sqrtfrac5 t_02+C t_0^5$, and the unique solution with this initial condition is $y = sqrtfrac5 t2+C t^5$ with that $C$. Similarly for $y_0 < 0$ with
$y_0 = -sqrtfrac5 t_02+C t_0^5$. And for $y_0 = 0$, the unique solution is $y = 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It often happens that there are particular solutions that are not covered by the general solution, but may be a limit of the general solution as some parameter goes to $+infty$ or $-infty$. In this case taking $C to infty$ gives you $y=0$.
There is no violation of the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem here. If $t_0 > 0$ and $y_0 > 0$, there is a unique $C$ such that $y_0 = sqrtfrac5 t_02+C t_0^5$, and the unique solution with this initial condition is $y = sqrtfrac5 t2+C t^5$ with that $C$. Similarly for $y_0 < 0$ with
$y_0 = -sqrtfrac5 t_02+C t_0^5$. And for $y_0 = 0$, the unique solution is $y = 0$.
$endgroup$
It often happens that there are particular solutions that are not covered by the general solution, but may be a limit of the general solution as some parameter goes to $+infty$ or $-infty$. In this case taking $C to infty$ gives you $y=0$.
There is no violation of the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem here. If $t_0 > 0$ and $y_0 > 0$, there is a unique $C$ such that $y_0 = sqrtfrac5 t_02+C t_0^5$, and the unique solution with this initial condition is $y = sqrtfrac5 t2+C t^5$ with that $C$. Similarly for $y_0 < 0$ with
$y_0 = -sqrtfrac5 t_02+C t_0^5$. And for $y_0 = 0$, the unique solution is $y = 0$.
answered Sep 12 '17 at 19:56
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
331k23220475
331k23220475
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2427049%2fexistence-and-uniqueness-theorems-for-first-order-odes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@Robert Israel Thank you for your answer. In general, is there any way we can find such particular solutions (which are not covered by the general solution) without guessing? If they exist, are they always asymptotes? Or are they always the result of some parameters going to infinity?
$endgroup$
– John Lei
Sep 13 '17 at 3:14