Why does $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ lead to a circular motion? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMathematical proof of uniform circular motion.Circular MotionProof: Force always perpendicular and motion in a plane implies that the trajectory is a circleInvertibility of inertia matricesWhy are these triangles similar ? (Derivation of uniform circular motion equation )Shielding off an external gravitational field by using a centrifugeA Work-Kinetic energy proof that is mathematically sound?Circular Motion QuestionHyperbolic motion and circular motionWhy is this approach incorrect? - Circular motionSystematic way of obtaining conservation laws in dynamical systems
How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?
Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?
Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints
Did USCIS resume its biometric service for UK visa?
Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid
What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?
In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?
Springs with some finite mass
Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
How to manage monthly salary
aging parents with no investments
Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?
On the insanity of kings as an argument against Monarchy
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
"What time...?" or "At what time...?" - what is more grammatically correct?
What function has this graph?
Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently
What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?
Why does $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ lead to a circular motion?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMathematical proof of uniform circular motion.Circular MotionProof: Force always perpendicular and motion in a plane implies that the trajectory is a circleInvertibility of inertia matricesWhy are these triangles similar ? (Derivation of uniform circular motion equation )Shielding off an external gravitational field by using a centrifugeA Work-Kinetic energy proof that is mathematically sound?Circular Motion QuestionHyperbolic motion and circular motionWhy is this approach incorrect? - Circular motionSystematic way of obtaining conservation laws in dynamical systems
$begingroup$
Here is a mathematical proof that any force $F(t)$, which affects a body, so that $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$, where $v(t)$ is its velocity cannot change the amount of this velocity.
Further, there is stated that $vecv(t)$ itself cannot change, what I think is nonsense. Since:
$$beginpmatrix 1 \ 0 \ 0 endpmatrix + beginpmatrix 0 \ 1 \ 0 endpmatrix times t = beginpmatrix 1 \ t \ 0 endpmatrix $$
But maybe I am just wrong.
Now, I am further wondering in how far $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ leads to a circular motion and how to proof this using Netwons laws and calculus? Can you explain why a circle is created, if you let the time tick?
calculus circles physics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a mathematical proof that any force $F(t)$, which affects a body, so that $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$, where $v(t)$ is its velocity cannot change the amount of this velocity.
Further, there is stated that $vecv(t)$ itself cannot change, what I think is nonsense. Since:
$$beginpmatrix 1 \ 0 \ 0 endpmatrix + beginpmatrix 0 \ 1 \ 0 endpmatrix times t = beginpmatrix 1 \ t \ 0 endpmatrix $$
But maybe I am just wrong.
Now, I am further wondering in how far $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ leads to a circular motion and how to proof this using Netwons laws and calculus? Can you explain why a circle is created, if you let the time tick?
calculus circles physics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a mathematical proof that any force $F(t)$, which affects a body, so that $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$, where $v(t)$ is its velocity cannot change the amount of this velocity.
Further, there is stated that $vecv(t)$ itself cannot change, what I think is nonsense. Since:
$$beginpmatrix 1 \ 0 \ 0 endpmatrix + beginpmatrix 0 \ 1 \ 0 endpmatrix times t = beginpmatrix 1 \ t \ 0 endpmatrix $$
But maybe I am just wrong.
Now, I am further wondering in how far $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ leads to a circular motion and how to proof this using Netwons laws and calculus? Can you explain why a circle is created, if you let the time tick?
calculus circles physics
$endgroup$
Here is a mathematical proof that any force $F(t)$, which affects a body, so that $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$, where $v(t)$ is its velocity cannot change the amount of this velocity.
Further, there is stated that $vecv(t)$ itself cannot change, what I think is nonsense. Since:
$$beginpmatrix 1 \ 0 \ 0 endpmatrix + beginpmatrix 0 \ 1 \ 0 endpmatrix times t = beginpmatrix 1 \ t \ 0 endpmatrix $$
But maybe I am just wrong.
Now, I am further wondering in how far $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ leads to a circular motion and how to proof this using Netwons laws and calculus? Can you explain why a circle is created, if you let the time tick?
calculus circles physics
calculus circles physics
edited Mar 30 at 10:46
TVSuchty
asked Mar 30 at 10:28
TVSuchtyTVSuchty
184
184
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let the velocity vector be defined as $v(t) = (s cos( theta(t)), s sin (theta(t))$, where $theta(t)$ is a time varying quantity. Note that $s$ is a constant, since we have already proved that the speed of the velocity vector does not change.
Let the force vector be defined as $F(t) = (r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t))$ where $r(t)$ and $phi(t)$ are time varying quantities.
Now, we know that $F . v = 0$. Hence:
beginalign*
&r(t) s left[cos(theta(t))cos(phi(t)) + sin(theta(t))sin(phi(t)) right] = 0 \
&r(t)s[cos(theta(t) - phi(t))] = 0 quad text(since $cos(a - b) = cos a cos b + sin a sin b)$
endalign*
Let us assume that $r(t), s neq 0$ for the moment. If they are, then the problem reduces to trivial cases. So, this now means that $cos(theta(t) - phi(t)) = 0$, or $theta(t) - phi(t) = pi /2$. Hence, $ theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t) $.
Next, let us assume the mass of the body is 1 (otherwise, we will need to carry a factor of $m$ everywhere which is annoying and adds no real insight), and hence $F = fracdvdt$.
beginalign*
&F = fracdvdt \
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
fracd left(s cos (theta(t)), s sin (theta(t)) right)dt \
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-s sin (theta(t)) theta'(t), s cos (theta(t)) theta'(t) right)
quad text(Differentiating with respect to $t$)
\
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-s sin (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t), s cos (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t) right)quad text($theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t)$) \
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-stheta'(t) cos (phi(t)) , -stheta'(t) sin (phi(t)) right)quad \
%
endalign*
Comparing the LHS and the RHs, we conclude that $r(t) = -s theta'(t)$.
If we are interested in uniform circular motion, then we would set $theta'(t)$ to a constant and proceed to solve the system as described on wikipedia
For non-uniform circular motion, I don't know off-hand how to solve the system of equations, but I presume it is possible. I'll update the answer once I go look it up
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $$ vecF = mdvecvover dt =mcdot vecv'$$
so $$vecv'cdot vecv =0implies (vecv^2)' = 0 implies vecv^2 = constant$$
So $$|vecv|^2 = constantimplies |vecv| = constant_2$$
So the magnitude of velocity is constant, but not the velocity it self.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 10:44
$begingroup$
In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:10
$begingroup$
Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
Mar 30 at 11:14
$begingroup$
I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:16
$begingroup$
Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Mar 30 at 11:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try to think like this: the component of the force parallel to the velocity changes the module of the velocity, while component perpendicular to the velocity changes its direction. Since you have only a perpendicular component, the velocity will stay constant in module while changing its direction. Now, if your force rotationally symmetric and is parallel to $vecs$, you also have that $vecs$ and $vecv$ are perpendicular. Therefore by the same euristic argument as before we can say that $vecs$ will only change its direction and not its module. This is exactly like saying that the trajectory is a circle
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168130%2fwhy-does-vecft-cdot-vecvt-0-lead-to-a-circular-motion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let the velocity vector be defined as $v(t) = (s cos( theta(t)), s sin (theta(t))$, where $theta(t)$ is a time varying quantity. Note that $s$ is a constant, since we have already proved that the speed of the velocity vector does not change.
Let the force vector be defined as $F(t) = (r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t))$ where $r(t)$ and $phi(t)$ are time varying quantities.
Now, we know that $F . v = 0$. Hence:
beginalign*
&r(t) s left[cos(theta(t))cos(phi(t)) + sin(theta(t))sin(phi(t)) right] = 0 \
&r(t)s[cos(theta(t) - phi(t))] = 0 quad text(since $cos(a - b) = cos a cos b + sin a sin b)$
endalign*
Let us assume that $r(t), s neq 0$ for the moment. If they are, then the problem reduces to trivial cases. So, this now means that $cos(theta(t) - phi(t)) = 0$, or $theta(t) - phi(t) = pi /2$. Hence, $ theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t) $.
Next, let us assume the mass of the body is 1 (otherwise, we will need to carry a factor of $m$ everywhere which is annoying and adds no real insight), and hence $F = fracdvdt$.
beginalign*
&F = fracdvdt \
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
fracd left(s cos (theta(t)), s sin (theta(t)) right)dt \
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-s sin (theta(t)) theta'(t), s cos (theta(t)) theta'(t) right)
quad text(Differentiating with respect to $t$)
\
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-s sin (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t), s cos (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t) right)quad text($theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t)$) \
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-stheta'(t) cos (phi(t)) , -stheta'(t) sin (phi(t)) right)quad \
%
endalign*
Comparing the LHS and the RHs, we conclude that $r(t) = -s theta'(t)$.
If we are interested in uniform circular motion, then we would set $theta'(t)$ to a constant and proceed to solve the system as described on wikipedia
For non-uniform circular motion, I don't know off-hand how to solve the system of equations, but I presume it is possible. I'll update the answer once I go look it up
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let the velocity vector be defined as $v(t) = (s cos( theta(t)), s sin (theta(t))$, where $theta(t)$ is a time varying quantity. Note that $s$ is a constant, since we have already proved that the speed of the velocity vector does not change.
Let the force vector be defined as $F(t) = (r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t))$ where $r(t)$ and $phi(t)$ are time varying quantities.
Now, we know that $F . v = 0$. Hence:
beginalign*
&r(t) s left[cos(theta(t))cos(phi(t)) + sin(theta(t))sin(phi(t)) right] = 0 \
&r(t)s[cos(theta(t) - phi(t))] = 0 quad text(since $cos(a - b) = cos a cos b + sin a sin b)$
endalign*
Let us assume that $r(t), s neq 0$ for the moment. If they are, then the problem reduces to trivial cases. So, this now means that $cos(theta(t) - phi(t)) = 0$, or $theta(t) - phi(t) = pi /2$. Hence, $ theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t) $.
Next, let us assume the mass of the body is 1 (otherwise, we will need to carry a factor of $m$ everywhere which is annoying and adds no real insight), and hence $F = fracdvdt$.
beginalign*
&F = fracdvdt \
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
fracd left(s cos (theta(t)), s sin (theta(t)) right)dt \
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-s sin (theta(t)) theta'(t), s cos (theta(t)) theta'(t) right)
quad text(Differentiating with respect to $t$)
\
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-s sin (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t), s cos (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t) right)quad text($theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t)$) \
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-stheta'(t) cos (phi(t)) , -stheta'(t) sin (phi(t)) right)quad \
%
endalign*
Comparing the LHS and the RHs, we conclude that $r(t) = -s theta'(t)$.
If we are interested in uniform circular motion, then we would set $theta'(t)$ to a constant and proceed to solve the system as described on wikipedia
For non-uniform circular motion, I don't know off-hand how to solve the system of equations, but I presume it is possible. I'll update the answer once I go look it up
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let the velocity vector be defined as $v(t) = (s cos( theta(t)), s sin (theta(t))$, where $theta(t)$ is a time varying quantity. Note that $s$ is a constant, since we have already proved that the speed of the velocity vector does not change.
Let the force vector be defined as $F(t) = (r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t))$ where $r(t)$ and $phi(t)$ are time varying quantities.
Now, we know that $F . v = 0$. Hence:
beginalign*
&r(t) s left[cos(theta(t))cos(phi(t)) + sin(theta(t))sin(phi(t)) right] = 0 \
&r(t)s[cos(theta(t) - phi(t))] = 0 quad text(since $cos(a - b) = cos a cos b + sin a sin b)$
endalign*
Let us assume that $r(t), s neq 0$ for the moment. If they are, then the problem reduces to trivial cases. So, this now means that $cos(theta(t) - phi(t)) = 0$, or $theta(t) - phi(t) = pi /2$. Hence, $ theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t) $.
Next, let us assume the mass of the body is 1 (otherwise, we will need to carry a factor of $m$ everywhere which is annoying and adds no real insight), and hence $F = fracdvdt$.
beginalign*
&F = fracdvdt \
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
fracd left(s cos (theta(t)), s sin (theta(t)) right)dt \
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-s sin (theta(t)) theta'(t), s cos (theta(t)) theta'(t) right)
quad text(Differentiating with respect to $t$)
\
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-s sin (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t), s cos (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t) right)quad text($theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t)$) \
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-stheta'(t) cos (phi(t)) , -stheta'(t) sin (phi(t)) right)quad \
%
endalign*
Comparing the LHS and the RHs, we conclude that $r(t) = -s theta'(t)$.
If we are interested in uniform circular motion, then we would set $theta'(t)$ to a constant and proceed to solve the system as described on wikipedia
For non-uniform circular motion, I don't know off-hand how to solve the system of equations, but I presume it is possible. I'll update the answer once I go look it up
$endgroup$
Let the velocity vector be defined as $v(t) = (s cos( theta(t)), s sin (theta(t))$, where $theta(t)$ is a time varying quantity. Note that $s$ is a constant, since we have already proved that the speed of the velocity vector does not change.
Let the force vector be defined as $F(t) = (r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t))$ where $r(t)$ and $phi(t)$ are time varying quantities.
Now, we know that $F . v = 0$. Hence:
beginalign*
&r(t) s left[cos(theta(t))cos(phi(t)) + sin(theta(t))sin(phi(t)) right] = 0 \
&r(t)s[cos(theta(t) - phi(t))] = 0 quad text(since $cos(a - b) = cos a cos b + sin a sin b)$
endalign*
Let us assume that $r(t), s neq 0$ for the moment. If they are, then the problem reduces to trivial cases. So, this now means that $cos(theta(t) - phi(t)) = 0$, or $theta(t) - phi(t) = pi /2$. Hence, $ theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t) $.
Next, let us assume the mass of the body is 1 (otherwise, we will need to carry a factor of $m$ everywhere which is annoying and adds no real insight), and hence $F = fracdvdt$.
beginalign*
&F = fracdvdt \
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
fracd left(s cos (theta(t)), s sin (theta(t)) right)dt \
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-s sin (theta(t)) theta'(t), s cos (theta(t)) theta'(t) right)
quad text(Differentiating with respect to $t$)
\
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-s sin (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t), s cos (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t) right)quad text($theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t)$) \
%
&(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
left(-stheta'(t) cos (phi(t)) , -stheta'(t) sin (phi(t)) right)quad \
%
endalign*
Comparing the LHS and the RHs, we conclude that $r(t) = -s theta'(t)$.
If we are interested in uniform circular motion, then we would set $theta'(t)$ to a constant and proceed to solve the system as described on wikipedia
For non-uniform circular motion, I don't know off-hand how to solve the system of equations, but I presume it is possible. I'll update the answer once I go look it up
answered Mar 30 at 19:17
Siddharth BhatSiddharth Bhat
3,1571918
3,1571918
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $$ vecF = mdvecvover dt =mcdot vecv'$$
so $$vecv'cdot vecv =0implies (vecv^2)' = 0 implies vecv^2 = constant$$
So $$|vecv|^2 = constantimplies |vecv| = constant_2$$
So the magnitude of velocity is constant, but not the velocity it self.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 10:44
$begingroup$
In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:10
$begingroup$
Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
Mar 30 at 11:14
$begingroup$
I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:16
$begingroup$
Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Mar 30 at 11:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $$ vecF = mdvecvover dt =mcdot vecv'$$
so $$vecv'cdot vecv =0implies (vecv^2)' = 0 implies vecv^2 = constant$$
So $$|vecv|^2 = constantimplies |vecv| = constant_2$$
So the magnitude of velocity is constant, but not the velocity it self.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 10:44
$begingroup$
In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:10
$begingroup$
Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
Mar 30 at 11:14
$begingroup$
I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:16
$begingroup$
Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Mar 30 at 11:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $$ vecF = mdvecvover dt =mcdot vecv'$$
so $$vecv'cdot vecv =0implies (vecv^2)' = 0 implies vecv^2 = constant$$
So $$|vecv|^2 = constantimplies |vecv| = constant_2$$
So the magnitude of velocity is constant, but not the velocity it self.
$endgroup$
Since $$ vecF = mdvecvover dt =mcdot vecv'$$
so $$vecv'cdot vecv =0implies (vecv^2)' = 0 implies vecv^2 = constant$$
So $$|vecv|^2 = constantimplies |vecv| = constant_2$$
So the magnitude of velocity is constant, but not the velocity it self.
answered Mar 30 at 10:37
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
50k1361125
50k1361125
$begingroup$
Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 10:44
$begingroup$
In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:10
$begingroup$
Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
Mar 30 at 11:14
$begingroup$
I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:16
$begingroup$
Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Mar 30 at 11:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 10:44
$begingroup$
In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:10
$begingroup$
Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
Mar 30 at 11:14
$begingroup$
I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:16
$begingroup$
Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Mar 30 at 11:34
$begingroup$
Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 10:44
$begingroup$
Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 10:44
$begingroup$
In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:10
$begingroup$
In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:10
$begingroup$
Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
Mar 30 at 11:14
$begingroup$
Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
Mar 30 at 11:14
$begingroup$
I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:16
$begingroup$
I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
$endgroup$
– TVSuchty
Mar 30 at 11:16
$begingroup$
Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Mar 30 at 11:34
$begingroup$
Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Mar 30 at 11:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try to think like this: the component of the force parallel to the velocity changes the module of the velocity, while component perpendicular to the velocity changes its direction. Since you have only a perpendicular component, the velocity will stay constant in module while changing its direction. Now, if your force rotationally symmetric and is parallel to $vecs$, you also have that $vecs$ and $vecv$ are perpendicular. Therefore by the same euristic argument as before we can say that $vecs$ will only change its direction and not its module. This is exactly like saying that the trajectory is a circle
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try to think like this: the component of the force parallel to the velocity changes the module of the velocity, while component perpendicular to the velocity changes its direction. Since you have only a perpendicular component, the velocity will stay constant in module while changing its direction. Now, if your force rotationally symmetric and is parallel to $vecs$, you also have that $vecs$ and $vecv$ are perpendicular. Therefore by the same euristic argument as before we can say that $vecs$ will only change its direction and not its module. This is exactly like saying that the trajectory is a circle
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try to think like this: the component of the force parallel to the velocity changes the module of the velocity, while component perpendicular to the velocity changes its direction. Since you have only a perpendicular component, the velocity will stay constant in module while changing its direction. Now, if your force rotationally symmetric and is parallel to $vecs$, you also have that $vecs$ and $vecv$ are perpendicular. Therefore by the same euristic argument as before we can say that $vecs$ will only change its direction and not its module. This is exactly like saying that the trajectory is a circle
$endgroup$
Try to think like this: the component of the force parallel to the velocity changes the module of the velocity, while component perpendicular to the velocity changes its direction. Since you have only a perpendicular component, the velocity will stay constant in module while changing its direction. Now, if your force rotationally symmetric and is parallel to $vecs$, you also have that $vecs$ and $vecv$ are perpendicular. Therefore by the same euristic argument as before we can say that $vecs$ will only change its direction and not its module. This is exactly like saying that the trajectory is a circle
answered Mar 30 at 11:05
G.CarugnoG.Carugno
1309
1309
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168130%2fwhy-does-vecft-cdot-vecvt-0-lead-to-a-circular-motion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown