Why does $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ lead to a circular motion? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMathematical proof of uniform circular motion.Circular MotionProof: Force always perpendicular and motion in a plane implies that the trajectory is a circleInvertibility of inertia matricesWhy are these triangles similar ? (Derivation of uniform circular motion equation )Shielding off an external gravitational field by using a centrifugeA Work-Kinetic energy proof that is mathematically sound?Circular Motion QuestionHyperbolic motion and circular motionWhy is this approach incorrect? - Circular motionSystematic way of obtaining conservation laws in dynamical systems

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?

Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?

Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints

Did USCIS resume its biometric service for UK visa?

Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid

What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

Springs with some finite mass

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

How to manage monthly salary

aging parents with no investments

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

On the insanity of kings as an argument against Monarchy

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

"What time...?" or "At what time...?" - what is more grammatically correct?

What function has this graph?

Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently

What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?



Why does $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ lead to a circular motion?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMathematical proof of uniform circular motion.Circular MotionProof: Force always perpendicular and motion in a plane implies that the trajectory is a circleInvertibility of inertia matricesWhy are these triangles similar ? (Derivation of uniform circular motion equation )Shielding off an external gravitational field by using a centrifugeA Work-Kinetic energy proof that is mathematically sound?Circular Motion QuestionHyperbolic motion and circular motionWhy is this approach incorrect? - Circular motionSystematic way of obtaining conservation laws in dynamical systems










2












$begingroup$


Here is a mathematical proof that any force $F(t)$, which affects a body, so that $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$, where $v(t)$ is its velocity cannot change the amount of this velocity.



Further, there is stated that $vecv(t)$ itself cannot change, what I think is nonsense. Since:



$$beginpmatrix 1 \ 0 \ 0 endpmatrix + beginpmatrix 0 \ 1 \ 0 endpmatrix times t = beginpmatrix 1 \ t \ 0 endpmatrix $$



But maybe I am just wrong.
Now, I am further wondering in how far $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ leads to a circular motion and how to proof this using Netwons laws and calculus? Can you explain why a circle is created, if you let the time tick?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Here is a mathematical proof that any force $F(t)$, which affects a body, so that $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$, where $v(t)$ is its velocity cannot change the amount of this velocity.



    Further, there is stated that $vecv(t)$ itself cannot change, what I think is nonsense. Since:



    $$beginpmatrix 1 \ 0 \ 0 endpmatrix + beginpmatrix 0 \ 1 \ 0 endpmatrix times t = beginpmatrix 1 \ t \ 0 endpmatrix $$



    But maybe I am just wrong.
    Now, I am further wondering in how far $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ leads to a circular motion and how to proof this using Netwons laws and calculus? Can you explain why a circle is created, if you let the time tick?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      Here is a mathematical proof that any force $F(t)$, which affects a body, so that $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$, where $v(t)$ is its velocity cannot change the amount of this velocity.



      Further, there is stated that $vecv(t)$ itself cannot change, what I think is nonsense. Since:



      $$beginpmatrix 1 \ 0 \ 0 endpmatrix + beginpmatrix 0 \ 1 \ 0 endpmatrix times t = beginpmatrix 1 \ t \ 0 endpmatrix $$



      But maybe I am just wrong.
      Now, I am further wondering in how far $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ leads to a circular motion and how to proof this using Netwons laws and calculus? Can you explain why a circle is created, if you let the time tick?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Here is a mathematical proof that any force $F(t)$, which affects a body, so that $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$, where $v(t)$ is its velocity cannot change the amount of this velocity.



      Further, there is stated that $vecv(t)$ itself cannot change, what I think is nonsense. Since:



      $$beginpmatrix 1 \ 0 \ 0 endpmatrix + beginpmatrix 0 \ 1 \ 0 endpmatrix times t = beginpmatrix 1 \ t \ 0 endpmatrix $$



      But maybe I am just wrong.
      Now, I am further wondering in how far $vecF(t) cdot vecv(t) = 0$ leads to a circular motion and how to proof this using Netwons laws and calculus? Can you explain why a circle is created, if you let the time tick?







      calculus circles physics






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 30 at 10:46







      TVSuchty

















      asked Mar 30 at 10:28









      TVSuchtyTVSuchty

      184




      184




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Let the velocity vector be defined as $v(t) = (s cos( theta(t)), s sin (theta(t))$, where $theta(t)$ is a time varying quantity. Note that $s$ is a constant, since we have already proved that the speed of the velocity vector does not change.



          Let the force vector be defined as $F(t) = (r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t))$ where $r(t)$ and $phi(t)$ are time varying quantities.



          Now, we know that $F . v = 0$. Hence:



          beginalign*
          &r(t) s left[cos(theta(t))cos(phi(t)) + sin(theta(t))sin(phi(t)) right] = 0 \
          &r(t)s[cos(theta(t) - phi(t))] = 0 quad text(since $cos(a - b) = cos a cos b + sin a sin b)$
          endalign*



          Let us assume that $r(t), s neq 0$ for the moment. If they are, then the problem reduces to trivial cases. So, this now means that $cos(theta(t) - phi(t)) = 0$, or $theta(t) - phi(t) = pi /2$. Hence, $ theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t) $.



          Next, let us assume the mass of the body is 1 (otherwise, we will need to carry a factor of $m$ everywhere which is annoying and adds no real insight), and hence $F = fracdvdt$.



          beginalign*
          &F = fracdvdt \
          &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
          fracd left(s cos (theta(t)), s sin (theta(t)) right)dt \
          %
          &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
          left(-s sin (theta(t)) theta'(t), s cos (theta(t)) theta'(t) right)
          quad text(Differentiating with respect to $t$)
          \
          %
          &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
          left(-s sin (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t), s cos (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t) right)quad text($theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t)$) \
          %
          &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
          left(-stheta'(t) cos (phi(t)) , -stheta'(t) sin (phi(t)) right)quad \
          %
          endalign*

          Comparing the LHS and the RHs, we conclude that $r(t) = -s theta'(t)$.



          If we are interested in uniform circular motion, then we would set $theta'(t)$ to a constant and proceed to solve the system as described on wikipedia



          For non-uniform circular motion, I don't know off-hand how to solve the system of equations, but I presume it is possible. I'll update the answer once I go look it up






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            3












            $begingroup$

            Since $$ vecF = mdvecvover dt =mcdot vecv'$$



            so $$vecv'cdot vecv =0implies (vecv^2)' = 0 implies vecv^2 = constant$$



            So $$|vecv|^2 = constantimplies |vecv| = constant_2$$



            So the magnitude of velocity is constant, but not the velocity it self.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
              $endgroup$
              – TVSuchty
              Mar 30 at 10:44











            • $begingroup$
              In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
              $endgroup$
              – TVSuchty
              Mar 30 at 11:10










            • $begingroup$
              Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
              $endgroup$
              – Maria Mazur
              Mar 30 at 11:14










            • $begingroup$
              I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
              $endgroup$
              – TVSuchty
              Mar 30 at 11:16










            • $begingroup$
              Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
              $endgroup$
              – Berci
              Mar 30 at 11:34


















            0












            $begingroup$

            Try to think like this: the component of the force parallel to the velocity changes the module of the velocity, while component perpendicular to the velocity changes its direction. Since you have only a perpendicular component, the velocity will stay constant in module while changing its direction. Now, if your force rotationally symmetric and is parallel to $vecs$, you also have that $vecs$ and $vecv$ are perpendicular. Therefore by the same euristic argument as before we can say that $vecs$ will only change its direction and not its module. This is exactly like saying that the trajectory is a circle






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168130%2fwhy-does-vecft-cdot-vecvt-0-lead-to-a-circular-motion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              Let the velocity vector be defined as $v(t) = (s cos( theta(t)), s sin (theta(t))$, where $theta(t)$ is a time varying quantity. Note that $s$ is a constant, since we have already proved that the speed of the velocity vector does not change.



              Let the force vector be defined as $F(t) = (r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t))$ where $r(t)$ and $phi(t)$ are time varying quantities.



              Now, we know that $F . v = 0$. Hence:



              beginalign*
              &r(t) s left[cos(theta(t))cos(phi(t)) + sin(theta(t))sin(phi(t)) right] = 0 \
              &r(t)s[cos(theta(t) - phi(t))] = 0 quad text(since $cos(a - b) = cos a cos b + sin a sin b)$
              endalign*



              Let us assume that $r(t), s neq 0$ for the moment. If they are, then the problem reduces to trivial cases. So, this now means that $cos(theta(t) - phi(t)) = 0$, or $theta(t) - phi(t) = pi /2$. Hence, $ theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t) $.



              Next, let us assume the mass of the body is 1 (otherwise, we will need to carry a factor of $m$ everywhere which is annoying and adds no real insight), and hence $F = fracdvdt$.



              beginalign*
              &F = fracdvdt \
              &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
              fracd left(s cos (theta(t)), s sin (theta(t)) right)dt \
              %
              &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
              left(-s sin (theta(t)) theta'(t), s cos (theta(t)) theta'(t) right)
              quad text(Differentiating with respect to $t$)
              \
              %
              &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
              left(-s sin (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t), s cos (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t) right)quad text($theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t)$) \
              %
              &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
              left(-stheta'(t) cos (phi(t)) , -stheta'(t) sin (phi(t)) right)quad \
              %
              endalign*

              Comparing the LHS and the RHs, we conclude that $r(t) = -s theta'(t)$.



              If we are interested in uniform circular motion, then we would set $theta'(t)$ to a constant and proceed to solve the system as described on wikipedia



              For non-uniform circular motion, I don't know off-hand how to solve the system of equations, but I presume it is possible. I'll update the answer once I go look it up






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                Let the velocity vector be defined as $v(t) = (s cos( theta(t)), s sin (theta(t))$, where $theta(t)$ is a time varying quantity. Note that $s$ is a constant, since we have already proved that the speed of the velocity vector does not change.



                Let the force vector be defined as $F(t) = (r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t))$ where $r(t)$ and $phi(t)$ are time varying quantities.



                Now, we know that $F . v = 0$. Hence:



                beginalign*
                &r(t) s left[cos(theta(t))cos(phi(t)) + sin(theta(t))sin(phi(t)) right] = 0 \
                &r(t)s[cos(theta(t) - phi(t))] = 0 quad text(since $cos(a - b) = cos a cos b + sin a sin b)$
                endalign*



                Let us assume that $r(t), s neq 0$ for the moment. If they are, then the problem reduces to trivial cases. So, this now means that $cos(theta(t) - phi(t)) = 0$, or $theta(t) - phi(t) = pi /2$. Hence, $ theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t) $.



                Next, let us assume the mass of the body is 1 (otherwise, we will need to carry a factor of $m$ everywhere which is annoying and adds no real insight), and hence $F = fracdvdt$.



                beginalign*
                &F = fracdvdt \
                &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                fracd left(s cos (theta(t)), s sin (theta(t)) right)dt \
                %
                &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                left(-s sin (theta(t)) theta'(t), s cos (theta(t)) theta'(t) right)
                quad text(Differentiating with respect to $t$)
                \
                %
                &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                left(-s sin (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t), s cos (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t) right)quad text($theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t)$) \
                %
                &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                left(-stheta'(t) cos (phi(t)) , -stheta'(t) sin (phi(t)) right)quad \
                %
                endalign*

                Comparing the LHS and the RHs, we conclude that $r(t) = -s theta'(t)$.



                If we are interested in uniform circular motion, then we would set $theta'(t)$ to a constant and proceed to solve the system as described on wikipedia



                For non-uniform circular motion, I don't know off-hand how to solve the system of equations, but I presume it is possible. I'll update the answer once I go look it up






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Let the velocity vector be defined as $v(t) = (s cos( theta(t)), s sin (theta(t))$, where $theta(t)$ is a time varying quantity. Note that $s$ is a constant, since we have already proved that the speed of the velocity vector does not change.



                  Let the force vector be defined as $F(t) = (r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t))$ where $r(t)$ and $phi(t)$ are time varying quantities.



                  Now, we know that $F . v = 0$. Hence:



                  beginalign*
                  &r(t) s left[cos(theta(t))cos(phi(t)) + sin(theta(t))sin(phi(t)) right] = 0 \
                  &r(t)s[cos(theta(t) - phi(t))] = 0 quad text(since $cos(a - b) = cos a cos b + sin a sin b)$
                  endalign*



                  Let us assume that $r(t), s neq 0$ for the moment. If they are, then the problem reduces to trivial cases. So, this now means that $cos(theta(t) - phi(t)) = 0$, or $theta(t) - phi(t) = pi /2$. Hence, $ theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t) $.



                  Next, let us assume the mass of the body is 1 (otherwise, we will need to carry a factor of $m$ everywhere which is annoying and adds no real insight), and hence $F = fracdvdt$.



                  beginalign*
                  &F = fracdvdt \
                  &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                  fracd left(s cos (theta(t)), s sin (theta(t)) right)dt \
                  %
                  &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                  left(-s sin (theta(t)) theta'(t), s cos (theta(t)) theta'(t) right)
                  quad text(Differentiating with respect to $t$)
                  \
                  %
                  &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                  left(-s sin (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t), s cos (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t) right)quad text($theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t)$) \
                  %
                  &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                  left(-stheta'(t) cos (phi(t)) , -stheta'(t) sin (phi(t)) right)quad \
                  %
                  endalign*

                  Comparing the LHS and the RHs, we conclude that $r(t) = -s theta'(t)$.



                  If we are interested in uniform circular motion, then we would set $theta'(t)$ to a constant and proceed to solve the system as described on wikipedia



                  For non-uniform circular motion, I don't know off-hand how to solve the system of equations, but I presume it is possible. I'll update the answer once I go look it up






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Let the velocity vector be defined as $v(t) = (s cos( theta(t)), s sin (theta(t))$, where $theta(t)$ is a time varying quantity. Note that $s$ is a constant, since we have already proved that the speed of the velocity vector does not change.



                  Let the force vector be defined as $F(t) = (r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t))$ where $r(t)$ and $phi(t)$ are time varying quantities.



                  Now, we know that $F . v = 0$. Hence:



                  beginalign*
                  &r(t) s left[cos(theta(t))cos(phi(t)) + sin(theta(t))sin(phi(t)) right] = 0 \
                  &r(t)s[cos(theta(t) - phi(t))] = 0 quad text(since $cos(a - b) = cos a cos b + sin a sin b)$
                  endalign*



                  Let us assume that $r(t), s neq 0$ for the moment. If they are, then the problem reduces to trivial cases. So, this now means that $cos(theta(t) - phi(t)) = 0$, or $theta(t) - phi(t) = pi /2$. Hence, $ theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t) $.



                  Next, let us assume the mass of the body is 1 (otherwise, we will need to carry a factor of $m$ everywhere which is annoying and adds no real insight), and hence $F = fracdvdt$.



                  beginalign*
                  &F = fracdvdt \
                  &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                  fracd left(s cos (theta(t)), s sin (theta(t)) right)dt \
                  %
                  &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                  left(-s sin (theta(t)) theta'(t), s cos (theta(t)) theta'(t) right)
                  quad text(Differentiating with respect to $t$)
                  \
                  %
                  &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                  left(-s sin (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t), s cos (pi/2 + phi(t)) theta'(t) right)quad text($theta(t) = pi/2 + phi(t)$) \
                  %
                  &(r(t) cos(phi(t)), r(t) sin(phi(t)) =
                  left(-stheta'(t) cos (phi(t)) , -stheta'(t) sin (phi(t)) right)quad \
                  %
                  endalign*

                  Comparing the LHS and the RHs, we conclude that $r(t) = -s theta'(t)$.



                  If we are interested in uniform circular motion, then we would set $theta'(t)$ to a constant and proceed to solve the system as described on wikipedia



                  For non-uniform circular motion, I don't know off-hand how to solve the system of equations, but I presume it is possible. I'll update the answer once I go look it up







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 30 at 19:17









                  Siddharth BhatSiddharth Bhat

                  3,1571918




                  3,1571918





















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Since $$ vecF = mdvecvover dt =mcdot vecv'$$



                      so $$vecv'cdot vecv =0implies (vecv^2)' = 0 implies vecv^2 = constant$$



                      So $$|vecv|^2 = constantimplies |vecv| = constant_2$$



                      So the magnitude of velocity is constant, but not the velocity it self.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 10:44











                      • $begingroup$
                        In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 11:10










                      • $begingroup$
                        Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Maria Mazur
                        Mar 30 at 11:14










                      • $begingroup$
                        I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 11:16










                      • $begingroup$
                        Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Berci
                        Mar 30 at 11:34















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Since $$ vecF = mdvecvover dt =mcdot vecv'$$



                      so $$vecv'cdot vecv =0implies (vecv^2)' = 0 implies vecv^2 = constant$$



                      So $$|vecv|^2 = constantimplies |vecv| = constant_2$$



                      So the magnitude of velocity is constant, but not the velocity it self.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 10:44











                      • $begingroup$
                        In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 11:10










                      • $begingroup$
                        Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Maria Mazur
                        Mar 30 at 11:14










                      • $begingroup$
                        I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 11:16










                      • $begingroup$
                        Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Berci
                        Mar 30 at 11:34













                      3












                      3








                      3





                      $begingroup$

                      Since $$ vecF = mdvecvover dt =mcdot vecv'$$



                      so $$vecv'cdot vecv =0implies (vecv^2)' = 0 implies vecv^2 = constant$$



                      So $$|vecv|^2 = constantimplies |vecv| = constant_2$$



                      So the magnitude of velocity is constant, but not the velocity it self.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Since $$ vecF = mdvecvover dt =mcdot vecv'$$



                      so $$vecv'cdot vecv =0implies (vecv^2)' = 0 implies vecv^2 = constant$$



                      So $$|vecv|^2 = constantimplies |vecv| = constant_2$$



                      So the magnitude of velocity is constant, but not the velocity it self.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Mar 30 at 10:37









                      Maria MazurMaria Mazur

                      50k1361125




                      50k1361125











                      • $begingroup$
                        Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 10:44











                      • $begingroup$
                        In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 11:10










                      • $begingroup$
                        Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Maria Mazur
                        Mar 30 at 11:14










                      • $begingroup$
                        I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 11:16










                      • $begingroup$
                        Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Berci
                        Mar 30 at 11:34
















                      • $begingroup$
                        Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 10:44











                      • $begingroup$
                        In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 11:10










                      • $begingroup$
                        Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Maria Mazur
                        Mar 30 at 11:14










                      • $begingroup$
                        I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TVSuchty
                        Mar 30 at 11:16










                      • $begingroup$
                        Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Berci
                        Mar 30 at 11:34















                      $begingroup$
                      Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
                      $endgroup$
                      – TVSuchty
                      Mar 30 at 10:44





                      $begingroup$
                      Sure, but this does not explain the circle which is created by $vecs(t)$, does it?
                      $endgroup$
                      – TVSuchty
                      Mar 30 at 10:44













                      $begingroup$
                      In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
                      $endgroup$
                      – TVSuchty
                      Mar 30 at 11:10




                      $begingroup$
                      In the other prove s is defined to be the velocity squared. In physics generally the position is meant...
                      $endgroup$
                      – TVSuchty
                      Mar 30 at 11:10












                      $begingroup$
                      Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Maria Mazur
                      Mar 30 at 11:14




                      $begingroup$
                      Well, I'm not sure, but I think that what there was said s^2=vv is not true. It sholud be v =s ′, no?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Maria Mazur
                      Mar 30 at 11:14












                      $begingroup$
                      I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
                      $endgroup$
                      – TVSuchty
                      Mar 30 at 11:16




                      $begingroup$
                      I think I answered this already in my last comment. I assume a merge-conflict here...
                      $endgroup$
                      – TVSuchty
                      Mar 30 at 11:16












                      $begingroup$
                      Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Berci
                      Mar 30 at 11:34




                      $begingroup$
                      Any curve can be walked through by constant speed.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Berci
                      Mar 30 at 11:34











                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Try to think like this: the component of the force parallel to the velocity changes the module of the velocity, while component perpendicular to the velocity changes its direction. Since you have only a perpendicular component, the velocity will stay constant in module while changing its direction. Now, if your force rotationally symmetric and is parallel to $vecs$, you also have that $vecs$ and $vecv$ are perpendicular. Therefore by the same euristic argument as before we can say that $vecs$ will only change its direction and not its module. This is exactly like saying that the trajectory is a circle






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Try to think like this: the component of the force parallel to the velocity changes the module of the velocity, while component perpendicular to the velocity changes its direction. Since you have only a perpendicular component, the velocity will stay constant in module while changing its direction. Now, if your force rotationally symmetric and is parallel to $vecs$, you also have that $vecs$ and $vecv$ are perpendicular. Therefore by the same euristic argument as before we can say that $vecs$ will only change its direction and not its module. This is exactly like saying that the trajectory is a circle






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          Try to think like this: the component of the force parallel to the velocity changes the module of the velocity, while component perpendicular to the velocity changes its direction. Since you have only a perpendicular component, the velocity will stay constant in module while changing its direction. Now, if your force rotationally symmetric and is parallel to $vecs$, you also have that $vecs$ and $vecv$ are perpendicular. Therefore by the same euristic argument as before we can say that $vecs$ will only change its direction and not its module. This is exactly like saying that the trajectory is a circle






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Try to think like this: the component of the force parallel to the velocity changes the module of the velocity, while component perpendicular to the velocity changes its direction. Since you have only a perpendicular component, the velocity will stay constant in module while changing its direction. Now, if your force rotationally symmetric and is parallel to $vecs$, you also have that $vecs$ and $vecv$ are perpendicular. Therefore by the same euristic argument as before we can say that $vecs$ will only change its direction and not its module. This is exactly like saying that the trajectory is a circle







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 30 at 11:05









                          G.CarugnoG.Carugno

                          1309




                          1309



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168130%2fwhy-does-vecft-cdot-vecvt-0-lead-to-a-circular-motion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                              Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                              Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ