What does $f = g$ almost everywhere mean? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMeasurability of almost everywhere continuous functionsShow that a function almost everywhere continuous is measurableProve that every Lebesgue measurable function is equal almost everywhere to a Borel measurable functionA function constant almost everywhereWhat does “almost everywhere” mean in convergence almost everywhere?Sequences of Borel measurable functions and limit almost everywhereIf $f$ is finite almost everywhere and $E$ is of finite Lebesgue measure, then f is “almost” boundedProving for a Lebesgue measure the convergence in measure is equivalent to the convergence almost everywhere.A confusion on the definition of *almost everywhere*measurable and finite almost everywhere
Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D
How to check if all elements of 1 list are in the *same quantity* and in any order, in the list2?
Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?
Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis
Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?
A small doubt about the dominated convergence theorem
Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons
Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
How to write a definition with variants?
Running a General Election and the European Elections together
Are police here, aren't itthey?
Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?
Why is information "lost" when it got into a black hole?
Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?
Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?
How to count occurrences of text in a file?
WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?
Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?
Does soap repel water?
Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?
Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin
If the heap is zero-initialized for security, then why is the stack merely uninitialized?
How is this set of matrices closed under multiplication?
What does $f = g$ almost everywhere mean?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMeasurability of almost everywhere continuous functionsShow that a function almost everywhere continuous is measurableProve that every Lebesgue measurable function is equal almost everywhere to a Borel measurable functionA function constant almost everywhereWhat does “almost everywhere” mean in convergence almost everywhere?Sequences of Borel measurable functions and limit almost everywhereIf $f$ is finite almost everywhere and $E$ is of finite Lebesgue measure, then f is “almost” boundedProving for a Lebesgue measure the convergence in measure is equivalent to the convergence almost everywhere.A confusion on the definition of *almost everywhere*measurable and finite almost everywhere
$begingroup$
I need to prove the following proposition.
If $f,g: [a,b] rightarrow mathbbR, $ $f$ is Lebesgue measurable, and $ f = g $ almost everywhere, then $g$ is Lebesgue measurable. But I do not know what exactly is almost everywhere.
real-analysis lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I need to prove the following proposition.
If $f,g: [a,b] rightarrow mathbbR, $ $f$ is Lebesgue measurable, and $ f = g $ almost everywhere, then $g$ is Lebesgue measurable. But I do not know what exactly is almost everywhere.
real-analysis lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
$begingroup$
Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Mar 22 at 19:46
$begingroup$
We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 22 at 19:50
$begingroup$
You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Mar 22 at 19:54
$begingroup$
I just edited so it should be clear.
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 19:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I need to prove the following proposition.
If $f,g: [a,b] rightarrow mathbbR, $ $f$ is Lebesgue measurable, and $ f = g $ almost everywhere, then $g$ is Lebesgue measurable. But I do not know what exactly is almost everywhere.
real-analysis lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
I need to prove the following proposition.
If $f,g: [a,b] rightarrow mathbbR, $ $f$ is Lebesgue measurable, and $ f = g $ almost everywhere, then $g$ is Lebesgue measurable. But I do not know what exactly is almost everywhere.
real-analysis lebesgue-measure
real-analysis lebesgue-measure
edited Mar 27 at 18:01
zhw.
74.8k43175
74.8k43175
asked Mar 22 at 19:41
José MarínJosé Marín
195210
195210
1
$begingroup$
It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
$begingroup$
Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Mar 22 at 19:46
$begingroup$
We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 22 at 19:50
$begingroup$
You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Mar 22 at 19:54
$begingroup$
I just edited so it should be clear.
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 19:56
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
$begingroup$
Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Mar 22 at 19:46
$begingroup$
We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 22 at 19:50
$begingroup$
You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Mar 22 at 19:54
$begingroup$
I just edited so it should be clear.
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 19:56
1
1
$begingroup$
It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 22 at 19:44
$begingroup$
It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
1
$begingroup$
Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Mar 22 at 19:46
$begingroup$
Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Mar 22 at 19:46
$begingroup$
We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 22 at 19:50
$begingroup$
We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 22 at 19:50
$begingroup$
You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Mar 22 at 19:54
$begingroup$
You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Mar 22 at 19:54
$begingroup$
I just edited so it should be clear.
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 19:56
$begingroup$
I just edited so it should be clear.
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 19:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This terminology is from measure theory. Two functions are said to be equal almost everywhere on $[a,b]$ if there exists a set $Esubseteq [a,b]$ of measure $0$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $xin [a,b]setminus E$.
A subset $Esubseteq [a,b]$ is said to have measure $0$ if for every $epsilon>0$ there exist countably many intervals $((a_k, b_k))_k$ such that $Esubseteq bigcup_k (a_k, b_k)$ and $sum_k (b_k-a_k) < epsilon$.
How you can go about showing that if $f$ is measurable then so is $g$ depends on the definition you are using. Either way, I hope this helps!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, it helps thanks!
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 20:03
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158593%2fwhat-does-f-g-almost-everywhere-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This terminology is from measure theory. Two functions are said to be equal almost everywhere on $[a,b]$ if there exists a set $Esubseteq [a,b]$ of measure $0$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $xin [a,b]setminus E$.
A subset $Esubseteq [a,b]$ is said to have measure $0$ if for every $epsilon>0$ there exist countably many intervals $((a_k, b_k))_k$ such that $Esubseteq bigcup_k (a_k, b_k)$ and $sum_k (b_k-a_k) < epsilon$.
How you can go about showing that if $f$ is measurable then so is $g$ depends on the definition you are using. Either way, I hope this helps!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, it helps thanks!
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 20:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This terminology is from measure theory. Two functions are said to be equal almost everywhere on $[a,b]$ if there exists a set $Esubseteq [a,b]$ of measure $0$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $xin [a,b]setminus E$.
A subset $Esubseteq [a,b]$ is said to have measure $0$ if for every $epsilon>0$ there exist countably many intervals $((a_k, b_k))_k$ such that $Esubseteq bigcup_k (a_k, b_k)$ and $sum_k (b_k-a_k) < epsilon$.
How you can go about showing that if $f$ is measurable then so is $g$ depends on the definition you are using. Either way, I hope this helps!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, it helps thanks!
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 20:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This terminology is from measure theory. Two functions are said to be equal almost everywhere on $[a,b]$ if there exists a set $Esubseteq [a,b]$ of measure $0$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $xin [a,b]setminus E$.
A subset $Esubseteq [a,b]$ is said to have measure $0$ if for every $epsilon>0$ there exist countably many intervals $((a_k, b_k))_k$ such that $Esubseteq bigcup_k (a_k, b_k)$ and $sum_k (b_k-a_k) < epsilon$.
How you can go about showing that if $f$ is measurable then so is $g$ depends on the definition you are using. Either way, I hope this helps!
$endgroup$
This terminology is from measure theory. Two functions are said to be equal almost everywhere on $[a,b]$ if there exists a set $Esubseteq [a,b]$ of measure $0$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $xin [a,b]setminus E$.
A subset $Esubseteq [a,b]$ is said to have measure $0$ if for every $epsilon>0$ there exist countably many intervals $((a_k, b_k))_k$ such that $Esubseteq bigcup_k (a_k, b_k)$ and $sum_k (b_k-a_k) < epsilon$.
How you can go about showing that if $f$ is measurable then so is $g$ depends on the definition you are using. Either way, I hope this helps!
edited Mar 24 at 2:06
J. W. Tanner
4,0611320
4,0611320
answered Mar 22 at 19:50
QuokaQuoka
1,568316
1,568316
$begingroup$
Yes, it helps thanks!
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 20:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, it helps thanks!
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 20:03
$begingroup$
Yes, it helps thanks!
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 20:03
$begingroup$
Yes, it helps thanks!
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 20:03
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158593%2fwhat-does-f-g-almost-everywhere-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
$begingroup$
Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Mar 22 at 19:46
$begingroup$
We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 22 at 19:50
$begingroup$
You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Mar 22 at 19:54
$begingroup$
I just edited so it should be clear.
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 19:56