What does $f = g$ almost everywhere mean? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMeasurability of almost everywhere continuous functionsShow that a function almost everywhere continuous is measurableProve that every Lebesgue measurable function is equal almost everywhere to a Borel measurable functionA function constant almost everywhereWhat does “almost everywhere” mean in convergence almost everywhere?Sequences of Borel measurable functions and limit almost everywhereIf $f$ is finite almost everywhere and $E$ is of finite Lebesgue measure, then f is “almost” boundedProving for a Lebesgue measure the convergence in measure is equivalent to the convergence almost everywhere.A confusion on the definition of *almost everywhere*measurable and finite almost everywhere

Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D

How to check if all elements of 1 list are in the *same quantity* and in any order, in the list2?

Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis

Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?

A small doubt about the dominated convergence theorem

Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons

Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

How to write a definition with variants?

Running a General Election and the European Elections together

Are police here, aren't itthey?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

Why is information "lost" when it got into a black hole?

Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?

Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Does soap repel water?

Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?

Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin

If the heap is zero-initialized for security, then why is the stack merely uninitialized?

How is this set of matrices closed under multiplication?



What does $f = g$ almost everywhere mean?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMeasurability of almost everywhere continuous functionsShow that a function almost everywhere continuous is measurableProve that every Lebesgue measurable function is equal almost everywhere to a Borel measurable functionA function constant almost everywhereWhat does “almost everywhere” mean in convergence almost everywhere?Sequences of Borel measurable functions and limit almost everywhereIf $f$ is finite almost everywhere and $E$ is of finite Lebesgue measure, then f is “almost” boundedProving for a Lebesgue measure the convergence in measure is equivalent to the convergence almost everywhere.A confusion on the definition of *almost everywhere*measurable and finite almost everywhere










2












$begingroup$


I need to prove the following proposition.



If $f,g: [a,b] rightarrow mathbbR, $ $f$ is Lebesgue measurable, and $ f = g $ almost everywhere, then $g$ is Lebesgue measurable. But I do not know what exactly is almost everywhere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 22 at 19:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Mar 22 at 19:46











  • $begingroup$
    We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 22 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Mar 22 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    I just edited so it should be clear.
    $endgroup$
    – José Marín
    Mar 22 at 19:56















2












$begingroup$


I need to prove the following proposition.



If $f,g: [a,b] rightarrow mathbbR, $ $f$ is Lebesgue measurable, and $ f = g $ almost everywhere, then $g$ is Lebesgue measurable. But I do not know what exactly is almost everywhere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 22 at 19:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Mar 22 at 19:46











  • $begingroup$
    We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 22 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Mar 22 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    I just edited so it should be clear.
    $endgroup$
    – José Marín
    Mar 22 at 19:56













2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I need to prove the following proposition.



If $f,g: [a,b] rightarrow mathbbR, $ $f$ is Lebesgue measurable, and $ f = g $ almost everywhere, then $g$ is Lebesgue measurable. But I do not know what exactly is almost everywhere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I need to prove the following proposition.



If $f,g: [a,b] rightarrow mathbbR, $ $f$ is Lebesgue measurable, and $ f = g $ almost everywhere, then $g$ is Lebesgue measurable. But I do not know what exactly is almost everywhere.







real-analysis lebesgue-measure






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 27 at 18:01









zhw.

74.8k43175




74.8k43175










asked Mar 22 at 19:41









José MarínJosé Marín

195210




195210







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 22 at 19:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Mar 22 at 19:46











  • $begingroup$
    We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 22 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Mar 22 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    I just edited so it should be clear.
    $endgroup$
    – José Marín
    Mar 22 at 19:56












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 22 at 19:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Mar 22 at 19:46











  • $begingroup$
    We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 22 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Mar 22 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    I just edited so it should be clear.
    $endgroup$
    – José Marín
    Mar 22 at 19:56







1




1




$begingroup$
It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 22 at 19:44




$begingroup$
It means the set of points where $fne g$ has measure $0$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 22 at 19:44




1




1




$begingroup$
Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Mar 22 at 19:46





$begingroup$
Exactly what Tanner said. The set $A:=xin[a,b] : f(x)not = g(x)$ has measure zero. In this case it means that for all $varepsilon>0$ there exists intervals $I_1,...,I_n$ of total length $<varepsilon$ such that $Asubseteq bigcup_i=1^n I_i$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Mar 22 at 19:46













$begingroup$
We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 22 at 19:50




$begingroup$
We usually specify what measure we are talking about to avoid confusion. If no measure is specified, we usually mean Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 22 at 19:50












$begingroup$
You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Mar 22 at 19:54




$begingroup$
You should restate the problem, as some hypotheses are missing
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Mar 22 at 19:54












$begingroup$
I just edited so it should be clear.
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 19:56




$begingroup$
I just edited so it should be clear.
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 19:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

This terminology is from measure theory. Two functions are said to be equal almost everywhere on $[a,b]$ if there exists a set $Esubseteq [a,b]$ of measure $0$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $xin [a,b]setminus E$.




A subset $Esubseteq [a,b]$ is said to have measure $0$ if for every $epsilon>0$ there exist countably many intervals $((a_k, b_k))_k$ such that $Esubseteq bigcup_k (a_k, b_k)$ and $sum_k (b_k-a_k) < epsilon$.




How you can go about showing that if $f$ is measurable then so is $g$ depends on the definition you are using. Either way, I hope this helps!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it helps thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – José Marín
    Mar 22 at 20:03











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158593%2fwhat-does-f-g-almost-everywhere-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

This terminology is from measure theory. Two functions are said to be equal almost everywhere on $[a,b]$ if there exists a set $Esubseteq [a,b]$ of measure $0$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $xin [a,b]setminus E$.




A subset $Esubseteq [a,b]$ is said to have measure $0$ if for every $epsilon>0$ there exist countably many intervals $((a_k, b_k))_k$ such that $Esubseteq bigcup_k (a_k, b_k)$ and $sum_k (b_k-a_k) < epsilon$.




How you can go about showing that if $f$ is measurable then so is $g$ depends on the definition you are using. Either way, I hope this helps!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it helps thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – José Marín
    Mar 22 at 20:03















4












$begingroup$

This terminology is from measure theory. Two functions are said to be equal almost everywhere on $[a,b]$ if there exists a set $Esubseteq [a,b]$ of measure $0$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $xin [a,b]setminus E$.




A subset $Esubseteq [a,b]$ is said to have measure $0$ if for every $epsilon>0$ there exist countably many intervals $((a_k, b_k))_k$ such that $Esubseteq bigcup_k (a_k, b_k)$ and $sum_k (b_k-a_k) < epsilon$.




How you can go about showing that if $f$ is measurable then so is $g$ depends on the definition you are using. Either way, I hope this helps!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it helps thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – José Marín
    Mar 22 at 20:03













4












4








4





$begingroup$

This terminology is from measure theory. Two functions are said to be equal almost everywhere on $[a,b]$ if there exists a set $Esubseteq [a,b]$ of measure $0$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $xin [a,b]setminus E$.




A subset $Esubseteq [a,b]$ is said to have measure $0$ if for every $epsilon>0$ there exist countably many intervals $((a_k, b_k))_k$ such that $Esubseteq bigcup_k (a_k, b_k)$ and $sum_k (b_k-a_k) < epsilon$.




How you can go about showing that if $f$ is measurable then so is $g$ depends on the definition you are using. Either way, I hope this helps!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



This terminology is from measure theory. Two functions are said to be equal almost everywhere on $[a,b]$ if there exists a set $Esubseteq [a,b]$ of measure $0$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $xin [a,b]setminus E$.




A subset $Esubseteq [a,b]$ is said to have measure $0$ if for every $epsilon>0$ there exist countably many intervals $((a_k, b_k))_k$ such that $Esubseteq bigcup_k (a_k, b_k)$ and $sum_k (b_k-a_k) < epsilon$.




How you can go about showing that if $f$ is measurable then so is $g$ depends on the definition you are using. Either way, I hope this helps!







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 24 at 2:06









J. W. Tanner

4,0611320




4,0611320










answered Mar 22 at 19:50









QuokaQuoka

1,568316




1,568316











  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it helps thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – José Marín
    Mar 22 at 20:03
















  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it helps thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – José Marín
    Mar 22 at 20:03















$begingroup$
Yes, it helps thanks!
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 20:03




$begingroup$
Yes, it helps thanks!
$endgroup$
– José Marín
Mar 22 at 20:03

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158593%2fwhat-does-f-g-almost-everywhere-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ