Induction with unknown $n_0$ The Next CEO of Stack OverflowGeneralization of Bernoulli's Inequality.Finite series help with an obvious factProve by induction that $(1+x)^n geq 1+nx$Follow-up question on mathematical induction with arbitrary base caseProve Bernoulli inequality if $h>-1$How do mathematicians find the underlying idea?Proving base ten expansion for all real numbersProve the Euclidean Metric by InductionNormal convergence of series when the definition holds only for $n>n_0$?Proof of inequality involving sums in roots with n variables
How to place nodes around a circle from some initial angle?
Can MTA send mail via a relay without being told so?
Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?
WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?
Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
Flying from Cape Town to England and return to another province
Can a Bladesinger Wizard use Bladesong with a Hand Crossbow?
Does it make sense to invest money on space investigation?
0 rank tensor vs 1D vector
Does Germany produce more waste than the US?
Powershell. How to parse gci Name?
A Man With a Stainless Steel Endoskeleton (like The Terminator) Fighting Cloaked Aliens Only He Can See
Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?
Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?
Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?
Newlines in BSD sed vs gsed
Why the difference in type-inference over the as-pattern in two similar function definitions?
No sign flipping while figuring out the emf of voltaic cell?
Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?
Chain wire methods together in Lightning Web Components
Why this way of making earth uninhabitable in Interstellar?
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
INSERT to a table from a database to other (same SQL Server) using Dynamic SQL
Induction with unknown $n_0$
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowGeneralization of Bernoulli's Inequality.Finite series help with an obvious factProve by induction that $(1+x)^n geq 1+nx$Follow-up question on mathematical induction with arbitrary base caseProve Bernoulli inequality if $h>-1$How do mathematicians find the underlying idea?Proving base ten expansion for all real numbersProve the Euclidean Metric by InductionNormal convergence of series when the definition holds only for $n>n_0$?Proof of inequality involving sums in roots with n variables
$begingroup$
Proving by induction that $2^ngt n^3 ; ; ; forall ngeq 10$ isn't very difficult, but how would one prove by induction that $2^ngt n^3 ; ; ; forall ngeq n_0$ ? Meaning that one would have to find a suitable $n_0$ for which the base case of the inequality holds, without graphing tools.
The induction step $(nto n+1)$ would be:
$$2^n+1; =; 2cdot2^n$$$$;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;gt 2 cdot n^3=n^3+n^3 ;;;text(see basis step)$$
$$gt n^3+3n^2+3n+1 $$
$$=(n+1)^3$$
However I am unsure how to formulate the basis step with an unknown $n_0$.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Proving by induction that $2^ngt n^3 ; ; ; forall ngeq 10$ isn't very difficult, but how would one prove by induction that $2^ngt n^3 ; ; ; forall ngeq n_0$ ? Meaning that one would have to find a suitable $n_0$ for which the base case of the inequality holds, without graphing tools.
The induction step $(nto n+1)$ would be:
$$2^n+1; =; 2cdot2^n$$$$;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;gt 2 cdot n^3=n^3+n^3 ;;;text(see basis step)$$
$$gt n^3+3n^2+3n+1 $$
$$=(n+1)^3$$
However I am unsure how to formulate the basis step with an unknown $n_0$.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You don't need to find the smallest possible $n_0$. Just try a few numbers and you'll soon lead yourself to one that's big enough.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Mar 27 at 18:55
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker Sure, but I was hoping for a method that is less trial and error. I already know that the smallest possible $n_0$ is 10
$endgroup$
– user639631
Mar 27 at 18:56
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. We generally use inductive proofs because there's an easy way to find a base case, and in this case trial and error suffices. If there was an easy general way to find an $n_0$ which serves as a base case this method would serve as a proof and we wouldn't need induction.
$endgroup$
– K.Power
Mar 27 at 19:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Proving by induction that $2^ngt n^3 ; ; ; forall ngeq 10$ isn't very difficult, but how would one prove by induction that $2^ngt n^3 ; ; ; forall ngeq n_0$ ? Meaning that one would have to find a suitable $n_0$ for which the base case of the inequality holds, without graphing tools.
The induction step $(nto n+1)$ would be:
$$2^n+1; =; 2cdot2^n$$$$;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;gt 2 cdot n^3=n^3+n^3 ;;;text(see basis step)$$
$$gt n^3+3n^2+3n+1 $$
$$=(n+1)^3$$
However I am unsure how to formulate the basis step with an unknown $n_0$.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
Proving by induction that $2^ngt n^3 ; ; ; forall ngeq 10$ isn't very difficult, but how would one prove by induction that $2^ngt n^3 ; ; ; forall ngeq n_0$ ? Meaning that one would have to find a suitable $n_0$ for which the base case of the inequality holds, without graphing tools.
The induction step $(nto n+1)$ would be:
$$2^n+1; =; 2cdot2^n$$$$;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;gt 2 cdot n^3=n^3+n^3 ;;;text(see basis step)$$
$$gt n^3+3n^2+3n+1 $$
$$=(n+1)^3$$
However I am unsure how to formulate the basis step with an unknown $n_0$.
real-analysis
real-analysis
edited Mar 27 at 18:59
Robert Israel
330k23218473
330k23218473
asked Mar 27 at 18:52
user639631user639631
527
527
1
$begingroup$
You don't need to find the smallest possible $n_0$. Just try a few numbers and you'll soon lead yourself to one that's big enough.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Mar 27 at 18:55
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker Sure, but I was hoping for a method that is less trial and error. I already know that the smallest possible $n_0$ is 10
$endgroup$
– user639631
Mar 27 at 18:56
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. We generally use inductive proofs because there's an easy way to find a base case, and in this case trial and error suffices. If there was an easy general way to find an $n_0$ which serves as a base case this method would serve as a proof and we wouldn't need induction.
$endgroup$
– K.Power
Mar 27 at 19:00
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You don't need to find the smallest possible $n_0$. Just try a few numbers and you'll soon lead yourself to one that's big enough.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Mar 27 at 18:55
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker Sure, but I was hoping for a method that is less trial and error. I already know that the smallest possible $n_0$ is 10
$endgroup$
– user639631
Mar 27 at 18:56
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. We generally use inductive proofs because there's an easy way to find a base case, and in this case trial and error suffices. If there was an easy general way to find an $n_0$ which serves as a base case this method would serve as a proof and we wouldn't need induction.
$endgroup$
– K.Power
Mar 27 at 19:00
1
1
$begingroup$
You don't need to find the smallest possible $n_0$. Just try a few numbers and you'll soon lead yourself to one that's big enough.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Mar 27 at 18:55
$begingroup$
You don't need to find the smallest possible $n_0$. Just try a few numbers and you'll soon lead yourself to one that's big enough.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Mar 27 at 18:55
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker Sure, but I was hoping for a method that is less trial and error. I already know that the smallest possible $n_0$ is 10
$endgroup$
– user639631
Mar 27 at 18:56
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker Sure, but I was hoping for a method that is less trial and error. I already know that the smallest possible $n_0$ is 10
$endgroup$
– user639631
Mar 27 at 18:56
1
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. We generally use inductive proofs because there's an easy way to find a base case, and in this case trial and error suffices. If there was an easy general way to find an $n_0$ which serves as a base case this method would serve as a proof and we wouldn't need induction.
$endgroup$
– K.Power
Mar 27 at 19:00
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. We generally use inductive proofs because there's an easy way to find a base case, and in this case trial and error suffices. If there was an easy general way to find an $n_0$ which serves as a base case this method would serve as a proof and we wouldn't need induction.
$endgroup$
– K.Power
Mar 27 at 19:00
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Finding the exact value of $n_0inBbb R$ such that $2^n_0=n_0^3$ is not analytically possible but since $n_0inBbb N$, we can find its exact value by hand. Note that$$2^9=512<729=9^3\2^10=1024>1000=10^3$$therefore $n_0$ must be greater than or equal to $10$ for our base of indunction to hold. Also note that if $$f(x)=2^x\g(x)=x^3$$then $f'(x)>g'(x)$for all $xge 10$, leading to this result that $f(x)$ grows super faster than $g(x)$ for $xge 10$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could use the binomial theorem: for $n ge 4$
$$ 2^n = (1+1)^n ge n choose 4 = fracn(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)24$$
We want this $> n^3$, but we don't want too much work. So let's see:
if $n ge 6$ we have $n-3 ge n/2$, so
$$ n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3) ge n (n/2)^3 = n^4/8$$
so now we want
$$ fracn^48 cdot 24 > n^3$$
which is true if $n > 8 cdot 24 = 192 $.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164947%2finduction-with-unknown-n-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Finding the exact value of $n_0inBbb R$ such that $2^n_0=n_0^3$ is not analytically possible but since $n_0inBbb N$, we can find its exact value by hand. Note that$$2^9=512<729=9^3\2^10=1024>1000=10^3$$therefore $n_0$ must be greater than or equal to $10$ for our base of indunction to hold. Also note that if $$f(x)=2^x\g(x)=x^3$$then $f'(x)>g'(x)$for all $xge 10$, leading to this result that $f(x)$ grows super faster than $g(x)$ for $xge 10$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Finding the exact value of $n_0inBbb R$ such that $2^n_0=n_0^3$ is not analytically possible but since $n_0inBbb N$, we can find its exact value by hand. Note that$$2^9=512<729=9^3\2^10=1024>1000=10^3$$therefore $n_0$ must be greater than or equal to $10$ for our base of indunction to hold. Also note that if $$f(x)=2^x\g(x)=x^3$$then $f'(x)>g'(x)$for all $xge 10$, leading to this result that $f(x)$ grows super faster than $g(x)$ for $xge 10$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Finding the exact value of $n_0inBbb R$ such that $2^n_0=n_0^3$ is not analytically possible but since $n_0inBbb N$, we can find its exact value by hand. Note that$$2^9=512<729=9^3\2^10=1024>1000=10^3$$therefore $n_0$ must be greater than or equal to $10$ for our base of indunction to hold. Also note that if $$f(x)=2^x\g(x)=x^3$$then $f'(x)>g'(x)$for all $xge 10$, leading to this result that $f(x)$ grows super faster than $g(x)$ for $xge 10$.
$endgroup$
Finding the exact value of $n_0inBbb R$ such that $2^n_0=n_0^3$ is not analytically possible but since $n_0inBbb N$, we can find its exact value by hand. Note that$$2^9=512<729=9^3\2^10=1024>1000=10^3$$therefore $n_0$ must be greater than or equal to $10$ for our base of indunction to hold. Also note that if $$f(x)=2^x\g(x)=x^3$$then $f'(x)>g'(x)$for all $xge 10$, leading to this result that $f(x)$ grows super faster than $g(x)$ for $xge 10$.
answered Mar 27 at 18:59
Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz
18.2k31040
18.2k31040
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could use the binomial theorem: for $n ge 4$
$$ 2^n = (1+1)^n ge n choose 4 = fracn(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)24$$
We want this $> n^3$, but we don't want too much work. So let's see:
if $n ge 6$ we have $n-3 ge n/2$, so
$$ n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3) ge n (n/2)^3 = n^4/8$$
so now we want
$$ fracn^48 cdot 24 > n^3$$
which is true if $n > 8 cdot 24 = 192 $.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could use the binomial theorem: for $n ge 4$
$$ 2^n = (1+1)^n ge n choose 4 = fracn(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)24$$
We want this $> n^3$, but we don't want too much work. So let's see:
if $n ge 6$ we have $n-3 ge n/2$, so
$$ n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3) ge n (n/2)^3 = n^4/8$$
so now we want
$$ fracn^48 cdot 24 > n^3$$
which is true if $n > 8 cdot 24 = 192 $.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could use the binomial theorem: for $n ge 4$
$$ 2^n = (1+1)^n ge n choose 4 = fracn(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)24$$
We want this $> n^3$, but we don't want too much work. So let's see:
if $n ge 6$ we have $n-3 ge n/2$, so
$$ n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3) ge n (n/2)^3 = n^4/8$$
so now we want
$$ fracn^48 cdot 24 > n^3$$
which is true if $n > 8 cdot 24 = 192 $.
$endgroup$
You could use the binomial theorem: for $n ge 4$
$$ 2^n = (1+1)^n ge n choose 4 = fracn(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)24$$
We want this $> n^3$, but we don't want too much work. So let's see:
if $n ge 6$ we have $n-3 ge n/2$, so
$$ n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3) ge n (n/2)^3 = n^4/8$$
so now we want
$$ fracn^48 cdot 24 > n^3$$
which is true if $n > 8 cdot 24 = 192 $.
answered Mar 27 at 19:16
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
330k23218473
330k23218473
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164947%2finduction-with-unknown-n-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
You don't need to find the smallest possible $n_0$. Just try a few numbers and you'll soon lead yourself to one that's big enough.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Mar 27 at 18:55
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker Sure, but I was hoping for a method that is less trial and error. I already know that the smallest possible $n_0$ is 10
$endgroup$
– user639631
Mar 27 at 18:56
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. We generally use inductive proofs because there's an easy way to find a base case, and in this case trial and error suffices. If there was an easy general way to find an $n_0$ which serves as a base case this method would serve as a proof and we wouldn't need induction.
$endgroup$
– K.Power
Mar 27 at 19:00