$C^1$ Lipschitz function linear growth The Next CEO of Stack OverflowApproximate continous function with linear growth condition by Lipschitz functionWhy is this function not locally Lipschitz?Classify the growth of functions and find a more general growth functionLipschitz/Hölder continuity of cosine functionLinear functions $mathbbC^nlongrightarrowmathbbC^m$ are Lipschitz continousLipschitz Continuity For a Vector Function.Some questions about function's growth.Linear function: relation between linearity and continuityDifferentiable Manifolds, Metric Space Structure, Lipschitz ContinuityDifference between “Rate of growth of a function” and “Order of growth of a function”

Rotate a column

Chain wire methods together in Lightning Web Components

The past simple of "gaslight" – "gaslighted" or "gaslit"?

Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?

Why isn't acceleration always zero whenever velocity is zero, such as the moment a ball bounces off a wall?

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?

What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?

Can a Bladesinger Wizard use Bladesong with a Hand Crossbow?

How to edit “Name” property in GCI output?

Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?

What did we know about the Kessel run before the prequels?

Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin

Do I need to write [sic] when a number is less than 10 but isn't written out?

Easy to read palindrome checker

When you upcast Blindness/Deafness, do all targets suffer the same effect?

Are police here, aren't itthey?

Why, when going from special to general relativity, do we just replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives?

How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?

Math-accent symbol over parentheses enclosing accented symbol (amsmath)

How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?

Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?

Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)

Would be okay to drive on this tire?



$C^1$ Lipschitz function linear growth



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowApproximate continous function with linear growth condition by Lipschitz functionWhy is this function not locally Lipschitz?Classify the growth of functions and find a more general growth functionLipschitz/Hölder continuity of cosine functionLinear functions $mathbbC^nlongrightarrowmathbbC^m$ are Lipschitz continousLipschitz Continuity For a Vector Function.Some questions about function's growth.Linear function: relation between linearity and continuityDifferentiable Manifolds, Metric Space Structure, Lipschitz ContinuityDifference between “Rate of growth of a function” and “Order of growth of a function”










1












$begingroup$


I would like to know how to prove that a $C^1$ Lipschitz function has linear growth. (Actually I don't even know if it is true, it is a question in my exam – it says prove that, so it means it is true).



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    By "linear growth" do you mean that $tfracf(x)$ is bounded for $|x|>1$?
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:40











  • $begingroup$
    yes, more precisely |f(x)|<=k(1+|x|)
    $endgroup$
    – Minkowski Yaacov
    Mar 27 at 20:45















1












$begingroup$


I would like to know how to prove that a $C^1$ Lipschitz function has linear growth. (Actually I don't even know if it is true, it is a question in my exam – it says prove that, so it means it is true).



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    By "linear growth" do you mean that $tfracf(x)$ is bounded for $|x|>1$?
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:40











  • $begingroup$
    yes, more precisely |f(x)|<=k(1+|x|)
    $endgroup$
    – Minkowski Yaacov
    Mar 27 at 20:45













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


I would like to know how to prove that a $C^1$ Lipschitz function has linear growth. (Actually I don't even know if it is true, it is a question in my exam – it says prove that, so it means it is true).



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I would like to know how to prove that a $C^1$ Lipschitz function has linear growth. (Actually I don't even know if it is true, it is a question in my exam – it says prove that, so it means it is true).



Thanks in advance.







analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 27 at 19:42









Bernard

123k741117




123k741117










asked Mar 27 at 19:40









Minkowski YaacovMinkowski Yaacov

113




113











  • $begingroup$
    By "linear growth" do you mean that $tfracf(x)$ is bounded for $|x|>1$?
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:40











  • $begingroup$
    yes, more precisely |f(x)|<=k(1+|x|)
    $endgroup$
    – Minkowski Yaacov
    Mar 27 at 20:45
















  • $begingroup$
    By "linear growth" do you mean that $tfracf(x)$ is bounded for $|x|>1$?
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:40











  • $begingroup$
    yes, more precisely |f(x)|<=k(1+|x|)
    $endgroup$
    – Minkowski Yaacov
    Mar 27 at 20:45















$begingroup$
By "linear growth" do you mean that $tfracf(x)$ is bounded for $|x|>1$?
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 20:40





$begingroup$
By "linear growth" do you mean that $tfracf(x)$ is bounded for $|x|>1$?
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 20:40













$begingroup$
yes, more precisely |f(x)|<=k(1+|x|)
$endgroup$
– Minkowski Yaacov
Mar 27 at 20:45




$begingroup$
yes, more precisely |f(x)|<=k(1+|x|)
$endgroup$
– Minkowski Yaacov
Mar 27 at 20:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

No need for $C^1$:
$$fracf(x)lefracf(0)lefrac) + le L+|f(0)|.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    thanks but i just realize that i wanted to proof the opposite: that a function with linear growth is C^1 and Lipschitz. I'm sorry, my bad.
    $endgroup$
    – Minkowski Yaacov
    Mar 27 at 20:51







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then ask a new question, upvote and check my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:54










  • $begingroup$
    But I can answer that question right away: no. For a very simple reason: $|f(x)|le k(1+|x|)$ just means that the graph of $f$ is contained in some sector. But it can be anything there. Even completely non-continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:59











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165027%2fc1-lipschitz-function-linear-growth%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

No need for $C^1$:
$$fracf(x)lefracf(0)lefrac) + le L+|f(0)|.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    thanks but i just realize that i wanted to proof the opposite: that a function with linear growth is C^1 and Lipschitz. I'm sorry, my bad.
    $endgroup$
    – Minkowski Yaacov
    Mar 27 at 20:51







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then ask a new question, upvote and check my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:54










  • $begingroup$
    But I can answer that question right away: no. For a very simple reason: $|f(x)|le k(1+|x|)$ just means that the graph of $f$ is contained in some sector. But it can be anything there. Even completely non-continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:59















1












$begingroup$

No need for $C^1$:
$$fracf(x)lefracf(0)lefrac) + le L+|f(0)|.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    thanks but i just realize that i wanted to proof the opposite: that a function with linear growth is C^1 and Lipschitz. I'm sorry, my bad.
    $endgroup$
    – Minkowski Yaacov
    Mar 27 at 20:51







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then ask a new question, upvote and check my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:54










  • $begingroup$
    But I can answer that question right away: no. For a very simple reason: $|f(x)|le k(1+|x|)$ just means that the graph of $f$ is contained in some sector. But it can be anything there. Even completely non-continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:59













1












1








1





$begingroup$

No need for $C^1$:
$$fracf(x)lefracf(0)lefrac) + le L+|f(0)|.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



No need for $C^1$:
$$fracf(x)lefracf(0)lefrac) + le L+|f(0)|.$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 27 at 20:47









amsmathamsmath

3,278420




3,278420











  • $begingroup$
    thanks but i just realize that i wanted to proof the opposite: that a function with linear growth is C^1 and Lipschitz. I'm sorry, my bad.
    $endgroup$
    – Minkowski Yaacov
    Mar 27 at 20:51







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then ask a new question, upvote and check my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:54










  • $begingroup$
    But I can answer that question right away: no. For a very simple reason: $|f(x)|le k(1+|x|)$ just means that the graph of $f$ is contained in some sector. But it can be anything there. Even completely non-continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:59
















  • $begingroup$
    thanks but i just realize that i wanted to proof the opposite: that a function with linear growth is C^1 and Lipschitz. I'm sorry, my bad.
    $endgroup$
    – Minkowski Yaacov
    Mar 27 at 20:51







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then ask a new question, upvote and check my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:54










  • $begingroup$
    But I can answer that question right away: no. For a very simple reason: $|f(x)|le k(1+|x|)$ just means that the graph of $f$ is contained in some sector. But it can be anything there. Even completely non-continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 20:59















$begingroup$
thanks but i just realize that i wanted to proof the opposite: that a function with linear growth is C^1 and Lipschitz. I'm sorry, my bad.
$endgroup$
– Minkowski Yaacov
Mar 27 at 20:51





$begingroup$
thanks but i just realize that i wanted to proof the opposite: that a function with linear growth is C^1 and Lipschitz. I'm sorry, my bad.
$endgroup$
– Minkowski Yaacov
Mar 27 at 20:51





1




1




$begingroup$
Then ask a new question, upvote and check my answer.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 20:54




$begingroup$
Then ask a new question, upvote and check my answer.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 20:54












$begingroup$
But I can answer that question right away: no. For a very simple reason: $|f(x)|le k(1+|x|)$ just means that the graph of $f$ is contained in some sector. But it can be anything there. Even completely non-continuous.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 20:59




$begingroup$
But I can answer that question right away: no. For a very simple reason: $|f(x)|le k(1+|x|)$ just means that the graph of $f$ is contained in some sector. But it can be anything there. Even completely non-continuous.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 20:59

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165027%2fc1-lipschitz-function-linear-growth%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ