Find weak solution to Riemann problem for conservation law The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMethod of characteristics for Burgers' equation with rectangular dataEntropy Solution of the Burgers' EquationBurgers' Equation Shock SolutionsRiemann problem of nonconvex scalar conservation lawsShock-wave solution for PDE $u_t+(u-1)u_x=2$Conservation law $A_t + (A^3/2)_x = 0$ for flood water waveFinding weak solutions of conservation law $u_t + (u^4)_x = 0$Rarefaction solution to Riemann problem for $x/t=0$Weak Solution to Conservation Lawreversibility scalar conservation lawWhat is the use of the notion of consistency for Riemann solvers?Riemann problem of nonconvex scalar conservation lawsConservation law and entropy condition problemFind the weak solution of the conservation lawThe Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions for conservation and balance lawsDefinition of weak solution of a PDE that is given in the nondivergent formWeak solution for Burgers' equationShock of Burgers equation $u_t+uu_x=0$ at $t=0$

How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?

Writing differences on a blackboard

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"

Grabbing quick drinks

How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?

Why is quantifier elimination desirable for a given theory?

Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?

Is it possible to replace duplicates of a character with one character using tr

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?

How to place nodes around a circle from some initial angle?

Where does this common spurious transmission come from? Is there a quality difference?

Running a General Election and the European Elections together

What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?

Math-accent symbol over parentheses enclosing accented symbol (amsmath)

INSERT to a table from a database to other (same SQL Server) using Dynamic SQL

Does soap repel water?

Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin

Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?

What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?



Find weak solution to Riemann problem for conservation law



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMethod of characteristics for Burgers' equation with rectangular dataEntropy Solution of the Burgers' EquationBurgers' Equation Shock SolutionsRiemann problem of nonconvex scalar conservation lawsShock-wave solution for PDE $u_t+(u-1)u_x=2$Conservation law $A_t + (A^3/2)_x = 0$ for flood water waveFinding weak solutions of conservation law $u_t + (u^4)_x = 0$Rarefaction solution to Riemann problem for $x/t=0$Weak Solution to Conservation Lawreversibility scalar conservation lawWhat is the use of the notion of consistency for Riemann solvers?Riemann problem of nonconvex scalar conservation lawsConservation law and entropy condition problemFind the weak solution of the conservation lawThe Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions for conservation and balance lawsDefinition of weak solution of a PDE that is given in the nondivergent formWeak solution for Burgers' equationShock of Burgers equation $u_t+uu_x=0$ at $t=0$










2












$begingroup$



Find the weak solution of the following conservation law
$$ u_t + (u^2)_x = 0 $$
with the initial condition
$$ u(x,0) = leftlbrace
beginaligned
&u_l & &textif x < 0 ,\
&u_r & &textif x > 0.
endalignedright. $$

Consider both cases $u_l>u_r$ and $u_l<u_r$. Fin the solution at $x=0$ in each case.




Attempt



We have equation: $u_t + 2 u u_x = 0 $ and characteristics are given by $t' = 1 $ and $x' = 2u $ and $u' = 0$ and so $u = const$, $t = s$, $x = 2 u s + r $ so that
$$ x = 2 u(x,0) t + r $$
are characteristicts. so that
$$ x = begincases 2 u_l t + r, ; ; r < 0 \ 2 u_r t + r, ; ; r > 0 endcases $$
so thereis a shock formation at $x=0$. Any help in how to continue this problem?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$



    Find the weak solution of the following conservation law
    $$ u_t + (u^2)_x = 0 $$
    with the initial condition
    $$ u(x,0) = leftlbrace
    beginaligned
    &u_l & &textif x < 0 ,\
    &u_r & &textif x > 0.
    endalignedright. $$

    Consider both cases $u_l>u_r$ and $u_l<u_r$. Fin the solution at $x=0$ in each case.




    Attempt



    We have equation: $u_t + 2 u u_x = 0 $ and characteristics are given by $t' = 1 $ and $x' = 2u $ and $u' = 0$ and so $u = const$, $t = s$, $x = 2 u s + r $ so that
    $$ x = 2 u(x,0) t + r $$
    are characteristicts. so that
    $$ x = begincases 2 u_l t + r, ; ; r < 0 \ 2 u_r t + r, ; ; r > 0 endcases $$
    so thereis a shock formation at $x=0$. Any help in how to continue this problem?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      4



      $begingroup$



      Find the weak solution of the following conservation law
      $$ u_t + (u^2)_x = 0 $$
      with the initial condition
      $$ u(x,0) = leftlbrace
      beginaligned
      &u_l & &textif x < 0 ,\
      &u_r & &textif x > 0.
      endalignedright. $$

      Consider both cases $u_l>u_r$ and $u_l<u_r$. Fin the solution at $x=0$ in each case.




      Attempt



      We have equation: $u_t + 2 u u_x = 0 $ and characteristics are given by $t' = 1 $ and $x' = 2u $ and $u' = 0$ and so $u = const$, $t = s$, $x = 2 u s + r $ so that
      $$ x = 2 u(x,0) t + r $$
      are characteristicts. so that
      $$ x = begincases 2 u_l t + r, ; ; r < 0 \ 2 u_r t + r, ; ; r > 0 endcases $$
      so thereis a shock formation at $x=0$. Any help in how to continue this problem?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Find the weak solution of the following conservation law
      $$ u_t + (u^2)_x = 0 $$
      with the initial condition
      $$ u(x,0) = leftlbrace
      beginaligned
      &u_l & &textif x < 0 ,\
      &u_r & &textif x > 0.
      endalignedright. $$

      Consider both cases $u_l>u_r$ and $u_l<u_r$. Fin the solution at $x=0$ in each case.




      Attempt



      We have equation: $u_t + 2 u u_x = 0 $ and characteristics are given by $t' = 1 $ and $x' = 2u $ and $u' = 0$ and so $u = const$, $t = s$, $x = 2 u s + r $ so that
      $$ x = 2 u(x,0) t + r $$
      are characteristicts. so that
      $$ x = begincases 2 u_l t + r, ; ; r < 0 \ 2 u_r t + r, ; ; r > 0 endcases $$
      so thereis a shock formation at $x=0$. Any help in how to continue this problem?







      pde hyperbolic-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 25 at 7:52









      Harry49

      8,38931344




      8,38931344










      asked Mar 22 at 0:29









      Jimmy SabaterJimmy Sabater

      2,584325




      2,584325




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3





          +150







          $begingroup$

          This is very similar to the Riemann problem of the inviscid Burgers' equation (see e.g. (1), (2), (3), (4) and related posts). For this type of problem, weak solutions are not unique. Thus, I guess that the problem statement asks for the entropy solution. I will provide a detailed general answer for the case of conservation laws $u_t + f(u)_x = 0$ with Riemann data $u(x<0,0) = u_l$ and $u(x>0,0) = u_r$, where the flux $f$ is smooth and either convex or concave. If the flux has inflection points, the more general solution is provided here.



          In the case of convex or concave flux $f$, there are only two possible types of waves:



          • shock waves. If the solution is a shock wave with speed $s$,
            $$
            u(x,t) = leftlbracebeginaligned
            &u_l & &textif x < s t, \
            &u_r & &textif st < x,
            endalignedright.
            $$

            then the speed of shock must satisfy the Rankine-Hugoniot jump condition $s = fracf(u_l)-f(u_r)u_l-u_r$. Moreover, to be admissible, the shock wave must satisfy the Lax entropy condition $f'(u_l) > s > f'(u_r)$,
            where $f'$ denotes the derivative of $f$.


          • rarefaction waves. The are obtained from the self-similarity Ansatz $u(x,t) = v(xi)$ with $xi = x/t$, which leads to the identity $f'(v(xi)) = xi$. Since $f'$ is an increasing function, we can invert the previous equation to find $v(xi) = (f')^-1(xi)$. The final solution reads
            $$
            u(x,t) = leftlbracebeginaligned
            &u_l & &textif x leq f'(u_l) t, \
            &(f')^-1(x/t) & &textif f'(u_l) t leq x leq f'(u_r) t, \
            &u_r & &textif f'(u_r) t leq x,
            endalignedright.
            $$

            where $(f')^-1$ denotes the reciprocal function of $f'$. One notes that this solution requires $f'(u_l) leq f'(u_r)$.



          In the present case, the flux $f: u mapsto u^2$ is a smooth convex function, so that its derivative $f':umapsto 2u$ is increasing. Shock waves are obtained for $u_l geq u_r$ (cf. Lax entropy condition), and rarefaction waves are obtained for $u_l leq u_r$. In the first case, the shock speed deduced from the Rankine-Hugoniot condition reads $s = u_l + u_r$. The value of the solution at $x=0$ for positive times is $u_r$ if $s < 0$, and $u_l$ otherwise. In the second case, the reciprocal of the derivative is given by $(f')^-1 : xi mapsto xi/2$. The value of the solution at $x=0$ for positive times is $u_r$ if $u_r < 0$, $u_l$ if $u_l > 0$, and $0$ otherwise (i.e., if $u_l < 0 < u_r $).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            there is another bounty here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3157673/…
            $endgroup$
            – Mikey Spivak
            Mar 25 at 8:00











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157585%2ffind-weak-solution-to-riemann-problem-for-conservation-law%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3





          +150







          $begingroup$

          This is very similar to the Riemann problem of the inviscid Burgers' equation (see e.g. (1), (2), (3), (4) and related posts). For this type of problem, weak solutions are not unique. Thus, I guess that the problem statement asks for the entropy solution. I will provide a detailed general answer for the case of conservation laws $u_t + f(u)_x = 0$ with Riemann data $u(x<0,0) = u_l$ and $u(x>0,0) = u_r$, where the flux $f$ is smooth and either convex or concave. If the flux has inflection points, the more general solution is provided here.



          In the case of convex or concave flux $f$, there are only two possible types of waves:



          • shock waves. If the solution is a shock wave with speed $s$,
            $$
            u(x,t) = leftlbracebeginaligned
            &u_l & &textif x < s t, \
            &u_r & &textif st < x,
            endalignedright.
            $$

            then the speed of shock must satisfy the Rankine-Hugoniot jump condition $s = fracf(u_l)-f(u_r)u_l-u_r$. Moreover, to be admissible, the shock wave must satisfy the Lax entropy condition $f'(u_l) > s > f'(u_r)$,
            where $f'$ denotes the derivative of $f$.


          • rarefaction waves. The are obtained from the self-similarity Ansatz $u(x,t) = v(xi)$ with $xi = x/t$, which leads to the identity $f'(v(xi)) = xi$. Since $f'$ is an increasing function, we can invert the previous equation to find $v(xi) = (f')^-1(xi)$. The final solution reads
            $$
            u(x,t) = leftlbracebeginaligned
            &u_l & &textif x leq f'(u_l) t, \
            &(f')^-1(x/t) & &textif f'(u_l) t leq x leq f'(u_r) t, \
            &u_r & &textif f'(u_r) t leq x,
            endalignedright.
            $$

            where $(f')^-1$ denotes the reciprocal function of $f'$. One notes that this solution requires $f'(u_l) leq f'(u_r)$.



          In the present case, the flux $f: u mapsto u^2$ is a smooth convex function, so that its derivative $f':umapsto 2u$ is increasing. Shock waves are obtained for $u_l geq u_r$ (cf. Lax entropy condition), and rarefaction waves are obtained for $u_l leq u_r$. In the first case, the shock speed deduced from the Rankine-Hugoniot condition reads $s = u_l + u_r$. The value of the solution at $x=0$ for positive times is $u_r$ if $s < 0$, and $u_l$ otherwise. In the second case, the reciprocal of the derivative is given by $(f')^-1 : xi mapsto xi/2$. The value of the solution at $x=0$ for positive times is $u_r$ if $u_r < 0$, $u_l$ if $u_l > 0$, and $0$ otherwise (i.e., if $u_l < 0 < u_r $).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            there is another bounty here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3157673/…
            $endgroup$
            – Mikey Spivak
            Mar 25 at 8:00















          3





          +150







          $begingroup$

          This is very similar to the Riemann problem of the inviscid Burgers' equation (see e.g. (1), (2), (3), (4) and related posts). For this type of problem, weak solutions are not unique. Thus, I guess that the problem statement asks for the entropy solution. I will provide a detailed general answer for the case of conservation laws $u_t + f(u)_x = 0$ with Riemann data $u(x<0,0) = u_l$ and $u(x>0,0) = u_r$, where the flux $f$ is smooth and either convex or concave. If the flux has inflection points, the more general solution is provided here.



          In the case of convex or concave flux $f$, there are only two possible types of waves:



          • shock waves. If the solution is a shock wave with speed $s$,
            $$
            u(x,t) = leftlbracebeginaligned
            &u_l & &textif x < s t, \
            &u_r & &textif st < x,
            endalignedright.
            $$

            then the speed of shock must satisfy the Rankine-Hugoniot jump condition $s = fracf(u_l)-f(u_r)u_l-u_r$. Moreover, to be admissible, the shock wave must satisfy the Lax entropy condition $f'(u_l) > s > f'(u_r)$,
            where $f'$ denotes the derivative of $f$.


          • rarefaction waves. The are obtained from the self-similarity Ansatz $u(x,t) = v(xi)$ with $xi = x/t$, which leads to the identity $f'(v(xi)) = xi$. Since $f'$ is an increasing function, we can invert the previous equation to find $v(xi) = (f')^-1(xi)$. The final solution reads
            $$
            u(x,t) = leftlbracebeginaligned
            &u_l & &textif x leq f'(u_l) t, \
            &(f')^-1(x/t) & &textif f'(u_l) t leq x leq f'(u_r) t, \
            &u_r & &textif f'(u_r) t leq x,
            endalignedright.
            $$

            where $(f')^-1$ denotes the reciprocal function of $f'$. One notes that this solution requires $f'(u_l) leq f'(u_r)$.



          In the present case, the flux $f: u mapsto u^2$ is a smooth convex function, so that its derivative $f':umapsto 2u$ is increasing. Shock waves are obtained for $u_l geq u_r$ (cf. Lax entropy condition), and rarefaction waves are obtained for $u_l leq u_r$. In the first case, the shock speed deduced from the Rankine-Hugoniot condition reads $s = u_l + u_r$. The value of the solution at $x=0$ for positive times is $u_r$ if $s < 0$, and $u_l$ otherwise. In the second case, the reciprocal of the derivative is given by $(f')^-1 : xi mapsto xi/2$. The value of the solution at $x=0$ for positive times is $u_r$ if $u_r < 0$, $u_l$ if $u_l > 0$, and $0$ otherwise (i.e., if $u_l < 0 < u_r $).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            there is another bounty here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3157673/…
            $endgroup$
            – Mikey Spivak
            Mar 25 at 8:00













          3





          +150







          3





          +150



          3




          +150



          $begingroup$

          This is very similar to the Riemann problem of the inviscid Burgers' equation (see e.g. (1), (2), (3), (4) and related posts). For this type of problem, weak solutions are not unique. Thus, I guess that the problem statement asks for the entropy solution. I will provide a detailed general answer for the case of conservation laws $u_t + f(u)_x = 0$ with Riemann data $u(x<0,0) = u_l$ and $u(x>0,0) = u_r$, where the flux $f$ is smooth and either convex or concave. If the flux has inflection points, the more general solution is provided here.



          In the case of convex or concave flux $f$, there are only two possible types of waves:



          • shock waves. If the solution is a shock wave with speed $s$,
            $$
            u(x,t) = leftlbracebeginaligned
            &u_l & &textif x < s t, \
            &u_r & &textif st < x,
            endalignedright.
            $$

            then the speed of shock must satisfy the Rankine-Hugoniot jump condition $s = fracf(u_l)-f(u_r)u_l-u_r$. Moreover, to be admissible, the shock wave must satisfy the Lax entropy condition $f'(u_l) > s > f'(u_r)$,
            where $f'$ denotes the derivative of $f$.


          • rarefaction waves. The are obtained from the self-similarity Ansatz $u(x,t) = v(xi)$ with $xi = x/t$, which leads to the identity $f'(v(xi)) = xi$. Since $f'$ is an increasing function, we can invert the previous equation to find $v(xi) = (f')^-1(xi)$. The final solution reads
            $$
            u(x,t) = leftlbracebeginaligned
            &u_l & &textif x leq f'(u_l) t, \
            &(f')^-1(x/t) & &textif f'(u_l) t leq x leq f'(u_r) t, \
            &u_r & &textif f'(u_r) t leq x,
            endalignedright.
            $$

            where $(f')^-1$ denotes the reciprocal function of $f'$. One notes that this solution requires $f'(u_l) leq f'(u_r)$.



          In the present case, the flux $f: u mapsto u^2$ is a smooth convex function, so that its derivative $f':umapsto 2u$ is increasing. Shock waves are obtained for $u_l geq u_r$ (cf. Lax entropy condition), and rarefaction waves are obtained for $u_l leq u_r$. In the first case, the shock speed deduced from the Rankine-Hugoniot condition reads $s = u_l + u_r$. The value of the solution at $x=0$ for positive times is $u_r$ if $s < 0$, and $u_l$ otherwise. In the second case, the reciprocal of the derivative is given by $(f')^-1 : xi mapsto xi/2$. The value of the solution at $x=0$ for positive times is $u_r$ if $u_r < 0$, $u_l$ if $u_l > 0$, and $0$ otherwise (i.e., if $u_l < 0 < u_r $).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          This is very similar to the Riemann problem of the inviscid Burgers' equation (see e.g. (1), (2), (3), (4) and related posts). For this type of problem, weak solutions are not unique. Thus, I guess that the problem statement asks for the entropy solution. I will provide a detailed general answer for the case of conservation laws $u_t + f(u)_x = 0$ with Riemann data $u(x<0,0) = u_l$ and $u(x>0,0) = u_r$, where the flux $f$ is smooth and either convex or concave. If the flux has inflection points, the more general solution is provided here.



          In the case of convex or concave flux $f$, there are only two possible types of waves:



          • shock waves. If the solution is a shock wave with speed $s$,
            $$
            u(x,t) = leftlbracebeginaligned
            &u_l & &textif x < s t, \
            &u_r & &textif st < x,
            endalignedright.
            $$

            then the speed of shock must satisfy the Rankine-Hugoniot jump condition $s = fracf(u_l)-f(u_r)u_l-u_r$. Moreover, to be admissible, the shock wave must satisfy the Lax entropy condition $f'(u_l) > s > f'(u_r)$,
            where $f'$ denotes the derivative of $f$.


          • rarefaction waves. The are obtained from the self-similarity Ansatz $u(x,t) = v(xi)$ with $xi = x/t$, which leads to the identity $f'(v(xi)) = xi$. Since $f'$ is an increasing function, we can invert the previous equation to find $v(xi) = (f')^-1(xi)$. The final solution reads
            $$
            u(x,t) = leftlbracebeginaligned
            &u_l & &textif x leq f'(u_l) t, \
            &(f')^-1(x/t) & &textif f'(u_l) t leq x leq f'(u_r) t, \
            &u_r & &textif f'(u_r) t leq x,
            endalignedright.
            $$

            where $(f')^-1$ denotes the reciprocal function of $f'$. One notes that this solution requires $f'(u_l) leq f'(u_r)$.



          In the present case, the flux $f: u mapsto u^2$ is a smooth convex function, so that its derivative $f':umapsto 2u$ is increasing. Shock waves are obtained for $u_l geq u_r$ (cf. Lax entropy condition), and rarefaction waves are obtained for $u_l leq u_r$. In the first case, the shock speed deduced from the Rankine-Hugoniot condition reads $s = u_l + u_r$. The value of the solution at $x=0$ for positive times is $u_r$ if $s < 0$, and $u_l$ otherwise. In the second case, the reciprocal of the derivative is given by $(f')^-1 : xi mapsto xi/2$. The value of the solution at $x=0$ for positive times is $u_r$ if $u_r < 0$, $u_l$ if $u_l > 0$, and $0$ otherwise (i.e., if $u_l < 0 < u_r $).







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 27 at 17:19

























          answered Mar 25 at 7:50









          Harry49Harry49

          8,38931344




          8,38931344











          • $begingroup$
            there is another bounty here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3157673/…
            $endgroup$
            – Mikey Spivak
            Mar 25 at 8:00
















          • $begingroup$
            there is another bounty here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3157673/…
            $endgroup$
            – Mikey Spivak
            Mar 25 at 8:00















          $begingroup$
          there is another bounty here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3157673/…
          $endgroup$
          – Mikey Spivak
          Mar 25 at 8:00




          $begingroup$
          there is another bounty here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3157673/…
          $endgroup$
          – Mikey Spivak
          Mar 25 at 8:00

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157585%2ffind-weak-solution-to-riemann-problem-for-conservation-law%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

          Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

          Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ