Prove the set $leftvecxinmathbbR^n : 0 < x_i < 1, 1leq i leq nright$ is open. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove that any subset of $mathbbR^2$ which is $D$-open is also $D_1$-open.Prove that a set is openShow a set is open using open ballsHelp with proving triangle law to prove these distance functions are metric spacesProve this set is open in $mathbbR^n$Prove that $g(x,y) = left((x,y), (x,y)right)$ is continuous.Properties of $d(x,y) = vert x_1 - y_1vert^frac12 + vert x_2-y_2vert^frac12$Prove that the set $A=(x,y)inmathbbR^2: x^2 + y^2 > 4, y < 6$ is open in $mathbbR^2$Prove that $N((0,0);1)$ is an open set in $mathbbRtimesmathbbR$ with metric $d((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2))=|x_1-y_1|+|x_2-y_2|$.Determine whether the following subsets of $mathbbR^2$ are open with respect to the metric $d$.
Can the DM override racial traits?
How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?
How to handle characters who are more educated than the author?
why is the limit of this expression equal to 1?
Can each chord in a progression create its own key?
1960s short story making fun of James Bond-style spy fiction
My body leaves; my core can stay
Could an empire control the whole planet with today's comunication methods?
Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?
ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?
Separating matrix elements by lines
Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached
How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?
Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?
How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?
Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Prove the set $left{vecxinmathbbR^n : 0
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove that any subset of $mathbbR^2$ which is $D$-open is also $D_1$-open.Prove that a set is openShow a set is open using open ballsHelp with proving triangle law to prove these distance functions are metric spacesProve this set is open in $mathbbR^n$Prove that $g(x,y) = left((x,y), (x,y)right)$ is continuous.Properties of $d(x,y) = vert x_1 - y_1vert^frac12 + vert x_2-y_2vert^frac12$Prove that the set $A=(x,y)inmathbbR^2: x^2 + y^2 > 4, y < 6$ is open in $mathbbR^2$Prove that $N((0,0);1)$ is an open set in $mathbbRtimesmathbbR$ with metric $d((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2))=|x_1-y_1|+|x_2-y_2|$.Determine whether the following subsets of $mathbbR^2$ are open with respect to the metric $d$.
$begingroup$
I'm having a lot of difficulty with proving the set $S = leftvecxinmathbbR^2 : 0 < x_1,x_2 < 1right$ is open. I need to use the definition of an open set to prove this. At this point I mostly have "scratch work."
For any $vecain S$, $Vert vecaVert < 2$ since each component of the vector is between $0$ and $1$.
Let $vecy,vecain S$ and let $r = 2-Vertveca-vecyVert>0$. If $vecx in B_r(veca)$, then
$$Vertvecx-vecyVert leq Vertvecx-vecaVert + Vertveca-vecyVert <2.$$
Thus $|x_1-y_1|-|x_2-y_2| leq Vert(x_1-y_1,x_2-y_2)Vert<2$.
I have a hunch this is not the radius I should be using for the ball, but I'm not sure how to properly go about this problem.
real-analysis general-topology
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm having a lot of difficulty with proving the set $S = leftvecxinmathbbR^2 : 0 < x_1,x_2 < 1right$ is open. I need to use the definition of an open set to prove this. At this point I mostly have "scratch work."
For any $vecain S$, $Vert vecaVert < 2$ since each component of the vector is between $0$ and $1$.
Let $vecy,vecain S$ and let $r = 2-Vertveca-vecyVert>0$. If $vecx in B_r(veca)$, then
$$Vertvecx-vecyVert leq Vertvecx-vecaVert + Vertveca-vecyVert <2.$$
Thus $|x_1-y_1|-|x_2-y_2| leq Vert(x_1-y_1,x_2-y_2)Vert<2$.
I have a hunch this is not the radius I should be using for the ball, but I'm not sure how to properly go about this problem.
real-analysis general-topology
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
what metric are you using?
$endgroup$
– Riquelme
Mar 31 at 8:25
$begingroup$
Euclidean metric
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:29
1
$begingroup$
All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
$endgroup$
– Displayname
Mar 31 at 8:31
$begingroup$
Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
$endgroup$
– Ingix
Mar 31 at 8:33
$begingroup$
y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:46
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm having a lot of difficulty with proving the set $S = leftvecxinmathbbR^2 : 0 < x_1,x_2 < 1right$ is open. I need to use the definition of an open set to prove this. At this point I mostly have "scratch work."
For any $vecain S$, $Vert vecaVert < 2$ since each component of the vector is between $0$ and $1$.
Let $vecy,vecain S$ and let $r = 2-Vertveca-vecyVert>0$. If $vecx in B_r(veca)$, then
$$Vertvecx-vecyVert leq Vertvecx-vecaVert + Vertveca-vecyVert <2.$$
Thus $|x_1-y_1|-|x_2-y_2| leq Vert(x_1-y_1,x_2-y_2)Vert<2$.
I have a hunch this is not the radius I should be using for the ball, but I'm not sure how to properly go about this problem.
real-analysis general-topology
$endgroup$
I'm having a lot of difficulty with proving the set $S = leftvecxinmathbbR^2 : 0 < x_1,x_2 < 1right$ is open. I need to use the definition of an open set to prove this. At this point I mostly have "scratch work."
For any $vecain S$, $Vert vecaVert < 2$ since each component of the vector is between $0$ and $1$.
Let $vecy,vecain S$ and let $r = 2-Vertveca-vecyVert>0$. If $vecx in B_r(veca)$, then
$$Vertvecx-vecyVert leq Vertvecx-vecaVert + Vertveca-vecyVert <2.$$
Thus $|x_1-y_1|-|x_2-y_2| leq Vert(x_1-y_1,x_2-y_2)Vert<2$.
I have a hunch this is not the radius I should be using for the ball, but I'm not sure how to properly go about this problem.
real-analysis general-topology
real-analysis general-topology
edited Mar 31 at 8:29
Ingix
5,232259
5,232259
asked Mar 31 at 8:24
moofasamoofasa
82
82
3
$begingroup$
what metric are you using?
$endgroup$
– Riquelme
Mar 31 at 8:25
$begingroup$
Euclidean metric
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:29
1
$begingroup$
All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
$endgroup$
– Displayname
Mar 31 at 8:31
$begingroup$
Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
$endgroup$
– Ingix
Mar 31 at 8:33
$begingroup$
y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:46
|
show 2 more comments
3
$begingroup$
what metric are you using?
$endgroup$
– Riquelme
Mar 31 at 8:25
$begingroup$
Euclidean metric
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:29
1
$begingroup$
All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
$endgroup$
– Displayname
Mar 31 at 8:31
$begingroup$
Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
$endgroup$
– Ingix
Mar 31 at 8:33
$begingroup$
y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:46
3
3
$begingroup$
what metric are you using?
$endgroup$
– Riquelme
Mar 31 at 8:25
$begingroup$
what metric are you using?
$endgroup$
– Riquelme
Mar 31 at 8:25
$begingroup$
Euclidean metric
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:29
$begingroup$
Euclidean metric
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:29
1
1
$begingroup$
All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
$endgroup$
– Displayname
Mar 31 at 8:31
$begingroup$
All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
$endgroup$
– Displayname
Mar 31 at 8:31
$begingroup$
Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
$endgroup$
– Ingix
Mar 31 at 8:33
$begingroup$
Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
$endgroup$
– Ingix
Mar 31 at 8:33
$begingroup$
y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:46
$begingroup$
y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:46
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Assume (a,b) in S = [0,1]^2.
Let r > 0 be less than a, 1-a, b, and 1-b.
Show B((a,b),r) is a subset of S. (Euclidean metric)
Thus, as every point of S is inside an open subset S, S is open.
Alternatively, show S is the union of all the above described balls and conclude that as S is a union of open sets, it is open.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 9:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider $(a,b) in (0,1)×(0,1)$;
$d_x:= min (1-a,a)$; $d_y:= min (1-b,b)$;
$r:=min (d_x,d_y).$
$B_r(a,b)= $
sqrt(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2<r$.
$(x,y) in B_r(a,b)$ implies
$|x-a| < r le d_x$, and $|y-b| <r le d_y$, hence
$B_r(a,b) subset (0,1)×(0,1)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint
Show that if $x=(x_1,x_2,cdots,x_n)in S$, then by defining $$y=(y_1,y_2,cdots , y_n)\|y_i-x_i|<epsilon$$$y$ will also belong to $S$ for sufficiently small $epsilon>0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Apr 1 at 1:16
$begingroup$
Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Apr 1 at 7:53
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169163%2fprove-the-set-left-vecx-in-mathbbrn-0-x-i-1-1-leq-i-leq-n-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Assume (a,b) in S = [0,1]^2.
Let r > 0 be less than a, 1-a, b, and 1-b.
Show B((a,b),r) is a subset of S. (Euclidean metric)
Thus, as every point of S is inside an open subset S, S is open.
Alternatively, show S is the union of all the above described balls and conclude that as S is a union of open sets, it is open.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 9:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume (a,b) in S = [0,1]^2.
Let r > 0 be less than a, 1-a, b, and 1-b.
Show B((a,b),r) is a subset of S. (Euclidean metric)
Thus, as every point of S is inside an open subset S, S is open.
Alternatively, show S is the union of all the above described balls and conclude that as S is a union of open sets, it is open.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 9:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume (a,b) in S = [0,1]^2.
Let r > 0 be less than a, 1-a, b, and 1-b.
Show B((a,b),r) is a subset of S. (Euclidean metric)
Thus, as every point of S is inside an open subset S, S is open.
Alternatively, show S is the union of all the above described balls and conclude that as S is a union of open sets, it is open.
$endgroup$
Assume (a,b) in S = [0,1]^2.
Let r > 0 be less than a, 1-a, b, and 1-b.
Show B((a,b),r) is a subset of S. (Euclidean metric)
Thus, as every point of S is inside an open subset S, S is open.
Alternatively, show S is the union of all the above described balls and conclude that as S is a union of open sets, it is open.
answered Mar 31 at 9:09
William ElliotWilliam Elliot
9,1812820
9,1812820
$begingroup$
I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 9:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 9:48
$begingroup$
I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 9:48
$begingroup$
I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 9:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider $(a,b) in (0,1)×(0,1)$;
$d_x:= min (1-a,a)$; $d_y:= min (1-b,b)$;
$r:=min (d_x,d_y).$
$B_r(a,b)= $
sqrt(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2<r$.
$(x,y) in B_r(a,b)$ implies
$|x-a| < r le d_x$, and $|y-b| <r le d_y$, hence
$B_r(a,b) subset (0,1)×(0,1)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider $(a,b) in (0,1)×(0,1)$;
$d_x:= min (1-a,a)$; $d_y:= min (1-b,b)$;
$r:=min (d_x,d_y).$
$B_r(a,b)= $
sqrt(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2<r$.
$(x,y) in B_r(a,b)$ implies
$|x-a| < r le d_x$, and $|y-b| <r le d_y$, hence
$B_r(a,b) subset (0,1)×(0,1)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider $(a,b) in (0,1)×(0,1)$;
$d_x:= min (1-a,a)$; $d_y:= min (1-b,b)$;
$r:=min (d_x,d_y).$
$B_r(a,b)= $
sqrt(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2<r$.
$(x,y) in B_r(a,b)$ implies
$|x-a| < r le d_x$, and $|y-b| <r le d_y$, hence
$B_r(a,b) subset (0,1)×(0,1)$.
$endgroup$
Consider $(a,b) in (0,1)×(0,1)$;
$d_x:= min (1-a,a)$; $d_y:= min (1-b,b)$;
$r:=min (d_x,d_y).$
$B_r(a,b)= $
sqrt(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2<r$.
$(x,y) in B_r(a,b)$ implies
$|x-a| < r le d_x$, and $|y-b| <r le d_y$, hence
$B_r(a,b) subset (0,1)×(0,1)$.
answered Mar 31 at 10:35
Peter SzilasPeter Szilas
12k2822
12k2822
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint
Show that if $x=(x_1,x_2,cdots,x_n)in S$, then by defining $$y=(y_1,y_2,cdots , y_n)\|y_i-x_i|<epsilon$$$y$ will also belong to $S$ for sufficiently small $epsilon>0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Apr 1 at 1:16
$begingroup$
Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Apr 1 at 7:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint
Show that if $x=(x_1,x_2,cdots,x_n)in S$, then by defining $$y=(y_1,y_2,cdots , y_n)\|y_i-x_i|<epsilon$$$y$ will also belong to $S$ for sufficiently small $epsilon>0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Apr 1 at 1:16
$begingroup$
Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Apr 1 at 7:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint
Show that if $x=(x_1,x_2,cdots,x_n)in S$, then by defining $$y=(y_1,y_2,cdots , y_n)\|y_i-x_i|<epsilon$$$y$ will also belong to $S$ for sufficiently small $epsilon>0$.
$endgroup$
Hint
Show that if $x=(x_1,x_2,cdots,x_n)in S$, then by defining $$y=(y_1,y_2,cdots , y_n)\|y_i-x_i|<epsilon$$$y$ will also belong to $S$ for sufficiently small $epsilon>0$.
answered Mar 31 at 12:08
Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz
18.1k31040
18.1k31040
$begingroup$
Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Apr 1 at 1:16
$begingroup$
Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Apr 1 at 7:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Apr 1 at 1:16
$begingroup$
Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Apr 1 at 7:53
$begingroup$
Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Apr 1 at 1:16
$begingroup$
Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Apr 1 at 1:16
$begingroup$
Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Apr 1 at 7:53
$begingroup$
Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Apr 1 at 7:53
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169163%2fprove-the-set-left-vecx-in-mathbbrn-0-x-i-1-1-leq-i-leq-n-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
what metric are you using?
$endgroup$
– Riquelme
Mar 31 at 8:25
$begingroup$
Euclidean metric
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:29
1
$begingroup$
All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
$endgroup$
– Displayname
Mar 31 at 8:31
$begingroup$
Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
$endgroup$
– Ingix
Mar 31 at 8:33
$begingroup$
y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:46