Prove the set $leftvecxinmathbbR^n : 0 < x_i < 1, 1leq i leq nright$ is open. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove that any subset of $mathbbR^2$ which is $D$-open is also $D_1$-open.Prove that a set is openShow a set is open using open ballsHelp with proving triangle law to prove these distance functions are metric spacesProve this set is open in $mathbbR^n$Prove that $g(x,y) = left((x,y), (x,y)right)$ is continuous.Properties of $d(x,y) = vert x_1 - y_1vert^frac12 + vert x_2-y_2vert^frac12$Prove that the set $A=(x,y)inmathbbR^2: x^2 + y^2 > 4, y < 6$ is open in $mathbbR^2$Prove that $N((0,0);1)$ is an open set in $mathbbRtimesmathbbR$ with metric $d((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2))=|x_1-y_1|+|x_2-y_2|$.Determine whether the following subsets of $mathbbR^2$ are open with respect to the metric $d$.

Can the DM override racial traits?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

How to handle characters who are more educated than the author?

why is the limit of this expression equal to 1?

Can each chord in a progression create its own key?

1960s short story making fun of James Bond-style spy fiction

My body leaves; my core can stay

Could an empire control the whole planet with today's comunication methods?

Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?

ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?

Separating matrix elements by lines

Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached

How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?



Prove the set $left{vecxinmathbbR^n : 0



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove that any subset of $mathbbR^2$ which is $D$-open is also $D_1$-open.Prove that a set is openShow a set is open using open ballsHelp with proving triangle law to prove these distance functions are metric spacesProve this set is open in $mathbbR^n$Prove that $g(x,y) = left((x,y), (x,y)right)$ is continuous.Properties of $d(x,y) = vert x_1 - y_1vert^frac12 + vert x_2-y_2vert^frac12$Prove that the set $A=(x,y)inmathbbR^2: x^2 + y^2 > 4, y < 6$ is open in $mathbbR^2$Prove that $N((0,0);1)$ is an open set in $mathbbRtimesmathbbR$ with metric $d((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2))=|x_1-y_1|+|x_2-y_2|$.Determine whether the following subsets of $mathbbR^2$ are open with respect to the metric $d$.










0












$begingroup$


I'm having a lot of difficulty with proving the set $S = leftvecxinmathbbR^2 : 0 < x_1,x_2 < 1right$ is open. I need to use the definition of an open set to prove this. At this point I mostly have "scratch work."



For any $vecain S$, $Vert vecaVert < 2$ since each component of the vector is between $0$ and $1$.



Let $vecy,vecain S$ and let $r = 2-Vertveca-vecyVert>0$. If $vecx in B_r(veca)$, then
$$Vertvecx-vecyVert leq Vertvecx-vecaVert + Vertveca-vecyVert <2.$$



Thus $|x_1-y_1|-|x_2-y_2| leq Vert(x_1-y_1,x_2-y_2)Vert<2$.



I have a hunch this is not the radius I should be using for the ball, but I'm not sure how to properly go about this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    what metric are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Riquelme
    Mar 31 at 8:25










  • $begingroup$
    Euclidean metric
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 8:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
    $endgroup$
    – Displayname
    Mar 31 at 8:31










  • $begingroup$
    Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
    $endgroup$
    – Ingix
    Mar 31 at 8:33










  • $begingroup$
    y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 8:46















0












$begingroup$


I'm having a lot of difficulty with proving the set $S = leftvecxinmathbbR^2 : 0 < x_1,x_2 < 1right$ is open. I need to use the definition of an open set to prove this. At this point I mostly have "scratch work."



For any $vecain S$, $Vert vecaVert < 2$ since each component of the vector is between $0$ and $1$.



Let $vecy,vecain S$ and let $r = 2-Vertveca-vecyVert>0$. If $vecx in B_r(veca)$, then
$$Vertvecx-vecyVert leq Vertvecx-vecaVert + Vertveca-vecyVert <2.$$



Thus $|x_1-y_1|-|x_2-y_2| leq Vert(x_1-y_1,x_2-y_2)Vert<2$.



I have a hunch this is not the radius I should be using for the ball, but I'm not sure how to properly go about this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    what metric are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Riquelme
    Mar 31 at 8:25










  • $begingroup$
    Euclidean metric
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 8:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
    $endgroup$
    – Displayname
    Mar 31 at 8:31










  • $begingroup$
    Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
    $endgroup$
    – Ingix
    Mar 31 at 8:33










  • $begingroup$
    y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 8:46













0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm having a lot of difficulty with proving the set $S = leftvecxinmathbbR^2 : 0 < x_1,x_2 < 1right$ is open. I need to use the definition of an open set to prove this. At this point I mostly have "scratch work."



For any $vecain S$, $Vert vecaVert < 2$ since each component of the vector is between $0$ and $1$.



Let $vecy,vecain S$ and let $r = 2-Vertveca-vecyVert>0$. If $vecx in B_r(veca)$, then
$$Vertvecx-vecyVert leq Vertvecx-vecaVert + Vertveca-vecyVert <2.$$



Thus $|x_1-y_1|-|x_2-y_2| leq Vert(x_1-y_1,x_2-y_2)Vert<2$.



I have a hunch this is not the radius I should be using for the ball, but I'm not sure how to properly go about this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm having a lot of difficulty with proving the set $S = leftvecxinmathbbR^2 : 0 < x_1,x_2 < 1right$ is open. I need to use the definition of an open set to prove this. At this point I mostly have "scratch work."



For any $vecain S$, $Vert vecaVert < 2$ since each component of the vector is between $0$ and $1$.



Let $vecy,vecain S$ and let $r = 2-Vertveca-vecyVert>0$. If $vecx in B_r(veca)$, then
$$Vertvecx-vecyVert leq Vertvecx-vecaVert + Vertveca-vecyVert <2.$$



Thus $|x_1-y_1|-|x_2-y_2| leq Vert(x_1-y_1,x_2-y_2)Vert<2$.



I have a hunch this is not the radius I should be using for the ball, but I'm not sure how to properly go about this problem.







real-analysis general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 31 at 8:29









Ingix

5,232259




5,232259










asked Mar 31 at 8:24









moofasamoofasa

82




82







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    what metric are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Riquelme
    Mar 31 at 8:25










  • $begingroup$
    Euclidean metric
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 8:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
    $endgroup$
    – Displayname
    Mar 31 at 8:31










  • $begingroup$
    Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
    $endgroup$
    – Ingix
    Mar 31 at 8:33










  • $begingroup$
    y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 8:46












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    what metric are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Riquelme
    Mar 31 at 8:25










  • $begingroup$
    Euclidean metric
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 8:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
    $endgroup$
    – Displayname
    Mar 31 at 8:31










  • $begingroup$
    Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
    $endgroup$
    – Ingix
    Mar 31 at 8:33










  • $begingroup$
    y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 8:46







3




3




$begingroup$
what metric are you using?
$endgroup$
– Riquelme
Mar 31 at 8:25




$begingroup$
what metric are you using?
$endgroup$
– Riquelme
Mar 31 at 8:25












$begingroup$
Euclidean metric
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:29




$begingroup$
Euclidean metric
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:29




1




1




$begingroup$
All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
$endgroup$
– Displayname
Mar 31 at 8:31




$begingroup$
All norms are equivalent on finite dimensional vector spaces, and as you want each component of the vector to have mod less than 1, use the sup (max) norm, then the norm of an arbitrary vector in your set would be $c$ for some $c < 1$ then a ball of radius $r<1-c$ should work?
$endgroup$
– Displayname
Mar 31 at 8:31












$begingroup$
Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
$endgroup$
– Ingix
Mar 31 at 8:33




$begingroup$
Your attempted argument is confusing because you use $a,y,x$ without telling what they are supposed to mean. For example, it seems that $a$ is any point in $S$ and you want to prove that some ball around it is still in $S$. But I can't figure out what you need $y$ for, and how it is determined.
$endgroup$
– Ingix
Mar 31 at 8:33












$begingroup$
y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:46




$begingroup$
y and a are both in S, as stated. I was playing around with the triangle inequality to see if I could get somewhere useful. I tried googling what the sup (max) norm is but I'm still a bit confused. For reference, this is for a real analysis course covering the basics about topology of R^n.
$endgroup$
– moofasa
Mar 31 at 8:46










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Assume (a,b) in S = [0,1]^2.

Let r > 0 be less than a, 1-a, b, and 1-b.

Show B((a,b),r) is a subset of S. (Euclidean metric)

Thus, as every point of S is inside an open subset S, S is open.



Alternatively, show S is the union of all the above described balls and conclude that as S is a union of open sets, it is open.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 9:48


















0












$begingroup$

Consider $(a,b) in (0,1)×(0,1)$;



$d_x:= min (1-a,a)$; $d_y:= min (1-b,b)$;



$r:=min (d_x,d_y).$



$B_r(a,b)= $



sqrt(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2<r$.



$(x,y) in B_r(a,b)$ implies



$|x-a| < r le d_x$, and $|y-b| <r le d_y$, hence



$B_r(a,b) subset (0,1)×(0,1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Hint



    Show that if $x=(x_1,x_2,cdots,x_n)in S$, then by defining $$y=(y_1,y_2,cdots , y_n)\|y_i-x_i|<epsilon$$$y$ will also belong to $S$ for sufficiently small $epsilon>0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
      $endgroup$
      – moofasa
      Apr 1 at 1:16










    • $begingroup$
      Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
      $endgroup$
      – Mostafa Ayaz
      Apr 1 at 7:53











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169163%2fprove-the-set-left-vecx-in-mathbbrn-0-x-i-1-1-leq-i-leq-n-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Assume (a,b) in S = [0,1]^2.

    Let r > 0 be less than a, 1-a, b, and 1-b.

    Show B((a,b),r) is a subset of S. (Euclidean metric)

    Thus, as every point of S is inside an open subset S, S is open.



    Alternatively, show S is the union of all the above described balls and conclude that as S is a union of open sets, it is open.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
      $endgroup$
      – moofasa
      Mar 31 at 9:48















    0












    $begingroup$

    Assume (a,b) in S = [0,1]^2.

    Let r > 0 be less than a, 1-a, b, and 1-b.

    Show B((a,b),r) is a subset of S. (Euclidean metric)

    Thus, as every point of S is inside an open subset S, S is open.



    Alternatively, show S is the union of all the above described balls and conclude that as S is a union of open sets, it is open.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
      $endgroup$
      – moofasa
      Mar 31 at 9:48













    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    Assume (a,b) in S = [0,1]^2.

    Let r > 0 be less than a, 1-a, b, and 1-b.

    Show B((a,b),r) is a subset of S. (Euclidean metric)

    Thus, as every point of S is inside an open subset S, S is open.



    Alternatively, show S is the union of all the above described balls and conclude that as S is a union of open sets, it is open.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Assume (a,b) in S = [0,1]^2.

    Let r > 0 be less than a, 1-a, b, and 1-b.

    Show B((a,b),r) is a subset of S. (Euclidean metric)

    Thus, as every point of S is inside an open subset S, S is open.



    Alternatively, show S is the union of all the above described balls and conclude that as S is a union of open sets, it is open.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Mar 31 at 9:09









    William ElliotWilliam Elliot

    9,1812820




    9,1812820











    • $begingroup$
      I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
      $endgroup$
      – moofasa
      Mar 31 at 9:48
















    • $begingroup$
      I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
      $endgroup$
      – moofasa
      Mar 31 at 9:48















    $begingroup$
    I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 9:48




    $begingroup$
    I'm not seeing how to relate these balls to showing that (x,y) in B((a,b),r) => 0<x<1 and 0<y<1.
    $endgroup$
    – moofasa
    Mar 31 at 9:48











    0












    $begingroup$

    Consider $(a,b) in (0,1)×(0,1)$;



    $d_x:= min (1-a,a)$; $d_y:= min (1-b,b)$;



    $r:=min (d_x,d_y).$



    $B_r(a,b)= $



    sqrt(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2<r$.



    $(x,y) in B_r(a,b)$ implies



    $|x-a| < r le d_x$, and $|y-b| <r le d_y$, hence



    $B_r(a,b) subset (0,1)×(0,1)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      Consider $(a,b) in (0,1)×(0,1)$;



      $d_x:= min (1-a,a)$; $d_y:= min (1-b,b)$;



      $r:=min (d_x,d_y).$



      $B_r(a,b)= $



      sqrt(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2<r$.



      $(x,y) in B_r(a,b)$ implies



      $|x-a| < r le d_x$, and $|y-b| <r le d_y$, hence



      $B_r(a,b) subset (0,1)×(0,1)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Consider $(a,b) in (0,1)×(0,1)$;



        $d_x:= min (1-a,a)$; $d_y:= min (1-b,b)$;



        $r:=min (d_x,d_y).$



        $B_r(a,b)= $



        sqrt(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2<r$.



        $(x,y) in B_r(a,b)$ implies



        $|x-a| < r le d_x$, and $|y-b| <r le d_y$, hence



        $B_r(a,b) subset (0,1)×(0,1)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Consider $(a,b) in (0,1)×(0,1)$;



        $d_x:= min (1-a,a)$; $d_y:= min (1-b,b)$;



        $r:=min (d_x,d_y).$



        $B_r(a,b)= $



        sqrt(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2<r$.



        $(x,y) in B_r(a,b)$ implies



        $|x-a| < r le d_x$, and $|y-b| <r le d_y$, hence



        $B_r(a,b) subset (0,1)×(0,1)$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 31 at 10:35









        Peter SzilasPeter Szilas

        12k2822




        12k2822





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Hint



            Show that if $x=(x_1,x_2,cdots,x_n)in S$, then by defining $$y=(y_1,y_2,cdots , y_n)\|y_i-x_i|<epsilon$$$y$ will also belong to $S$ for sufficiently small $epsilon>0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
              $endgroup$
              – moofasa
              Apr 1 at 1:16










            • $begingroup$
              Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
              $endgroup$
              – Mostafa Ayaz
              Apr 1 at 7:53















            0












            $begingroup$

            Hint



            Show that if $x=(x_1,x_2,cdots,x_n)in S$, then by defining $$y=(y_1,y_2,cdots , y_n)\|y_i-x_i|<epsilon$$$y$ will also belong to $S$ for sufficiently small $epsilon>0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
              $endgroup$
              – moofasa
              Apr 1 at 1:16










            • $begingroup$
              Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
              $endgroup$
              – Mostafa Ayaz
              Apr 1 at 7:53













            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Hint



            Show that if $x=(x_1,x_2,cdots,x_n)in S$, then by defining $$y=(y_1,y_2,cdots , y_n)\|y_i-x_i|<epsilon$$$y$ will also belong to $S$ for sufficiently small $epsilon>0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Hint



            Show that if $x=(x_1,x_2,cdots,x_n)in S$, then by defining $$y=(y_1,y_2,cdots , y_n)\|y_i-x_i|<epsilon$$$y$ will also belong to $S$ for sufficiently small $epsilon>0$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 31 at 12:08









            Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

            18.1k31040




            18.1k31040











            • $begingroup$
              Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
              $endgroup$
              – moofasa
              Apr 1 at 1:16










            • $begingroup$
              Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
              $endgroup$
              – Mostafa Ayaz
              Apr 1 at 7:53
















            • $begingroup$
              Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
              $endgroup$
              – moofasa
              Apr 1 at 1:16










            • $begingroup$
              Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
              $endgroup$
              – Mostafa Ayaz
              Apr 1 at 7:53















            $begingroup$
            Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
            $endgroup$
            – moofasa
            Apr 1 at 1:16




            $begingroup$
            Maybe I am overthinking this, but I don't see how showing that the distance is smaller than epsilon argues that $vecy$ has components that are each between 0 and 1. Could you elaborate?
            $endgroup$
            – moofasa
            Apr 1 at 1:16












            $begingroup$
            Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
            $endgroup$
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Apr 1 at 7:53




            $begingroup$
            Sure. If any $x_i$ falls within $(0,1)$, then by definition $$x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon$$and you can choose $epsilon>0$ sufficiently small such that $$0<x_i-epsilon<y_i<x_i+epsilon<1$$this is because from $$0<u<1$$one can choose some $epsilon>0$ such that$$epsilon<u<1-epsilon$$
            $endgroup$
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Apr 1 at 7:53

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169163%2fprove-the-set-left-vecx-in-mathbbrn-0-x-i-1-1-leq-i-leq-n-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

            Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

            Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ