How many numbers less than $m$ and relatively prime to $n$, where $m>n$? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Count of numbers where both $n$ and $n+1$ have all prime factors less than $x$Counting elements of reduced residue systems modulo one number which are smaller than anotherFind all integers less than $m$ that are relatively prime to itInequality $varphi(N)>pi(N)$?Euler's totient function for large numbersHow find a closed form for the numbers which are relatively prime to $10$,On factoring and integer given the value of its Euler's totient function.How to count the number of perfect square greater than $N$ and less than $N^2$ that are relatively prime to $N$?Problem about the set of relatively prime integersSum of the number of relatively prime integers up to $x$, $x-1$, $ldots$, $1$

Is there more forest in the Northern Hemisphere now than 100 years ago?

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

Solve equation for value of x:

How would you say "es muy psicólogo"?

I can't produce songs

Found this skink in my tomato plant bucket. Is he trapped? Or could he leave if he wanted?

Why is std::move not [[nodiscard]] in C++20?

Why not send Voyager 3 and 4 following up the paths taken by Voyager 1 and 2 to re-transmit signals of later as they fly away from Earth?

A proverb that is used to imply that you have unexpectedly faced a big problem

Can two person see the same photon?

What does Turing mean by this statement?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

Positioning dot before text in math mode

Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose-gear up landing?

Getting out of while loop on console

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?

Google .dev domain strangely redirects to https

Connecting Mac Book Pro 2017 to 2 Projectors via USB C

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

Is multiple magic items in one inherently imbalanced?



How many numbers less than $m$ and relatively prime to $n$, where $m>n$?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Count of numbers where both $n$ and $n+1$ have all prime factors less than $x$Counting elements of reduced residue systems modulo one number which are smaller than anotherFind all integers less than $m$ that are relatively prime to itInequality $varphi(N)>pi(N)$?Euler's totient function for large numbersHow find a closed form for the numbers which are relatively prime to $10$,On factoring and integer given the value of its Euler's totient function.How to count the number of perfect square greater than $N$ and less than $N^2$ that are relatively prime to $N$?Problem about the set of relatively prime integersSum of the number of relatively prime integers up to $x$, $x-1$, $ldots$, $1$










1












$begingroup$



Let $m$ and $n$ be two integers such that $m>n$. Then find the number of integers less than $m$ and relatively prime to $n$.




I had come across a problem of this type with specific values for $m$ and $n$, unfortunately, the values I don't remember anymore. So I asked this general question. How to solve this type of question?



My thoughts are that we need to count the numbers. So we can count the number of integers less than $m$ and relatively prime to $m$ using Euler's totient function. Now among those numbers, also belongs the numbers which are relatively prime to $n$. We can also find the numbers less than $n$ and relatively prime to $n$. That will give a rough estimation. But how do we know about the actual number of such integers? Can anybody help me with this?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $gcd(k,n) = gcd(k + n, n)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 15:23










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer can you elaborate a bit more on how this relation will help me, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    May 28 '17 at 15:29










  • $begingroup$
    It tells you how many integers $an < k leqslant (a+1)n$ are coprime to $n$. If $m$ is a multiple of $n$, that finishes it. If $m = qcdot n + r$ with $0 < r < n$, the remaining part of the problem is difficult.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer if $m$ is not a multiple of $n$, then how difficult is the problem to solve
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    May 28 '17 at 16:41






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Let us define $Phi(n,m)$ as the number of positive integers coprime to $n$ and not exceeding $m$. Then the above gives us $$Phi(n,m) = biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorcdot varphi(n) + Phibiggl(n, m - ncdot biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorBiggr).$$ Assuming one knows $varphi(n)$, the problem is then to find $Phi(n,r)$ for $0 leqslant r < n$. If the numbers coprime to $n$ were evenly distributed, then $Phi(n,r)$ would be close to $fracrn-1cdot varphi(n)$. But since the numbers coprime to $n$ are in general not very close to being evenly distributed,
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 17:35















1












$begingroup$



Let $m$ and $n$ be two integers such that $m>n$. Then find the number of integers less than $m$ and relatively prime to $n$.




I had come across a problem of this type with specific values for $m$ and $n$, unfortunately, the values I don't remember anymore. So I asked this general question. How to solve this type of question?



My thoughts are that we need to count the numbers. So we can count the number of integers less than $m$ and relatively prime to $m$ using Euler's totient function. Now among those numbers, also belongs the numbers which are relatively prime to $n$. We can also find the numbers less than $n$ and relatively prime to $n$. That will give a rough estimation. But how do we know about the actual number of such integers? Can anybody help me with this?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $gcd(k,n) = gcd(k + n, n)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 15:23










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer can you elaborate a bit more on how this relation will help me, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    May 28 '17 at 15:29










  • $begingroup$
    It tells you how many integers $an < k leqslant (a+1)n$ are coprime to $n$. If $m$ is a multiple of $n$, that finishes it. If $m = qcdot n + r$ with $0 < r < n$, the remaining part of the problem is difficult.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer if $m$ is not a multiple of $n$, then how difficult is the problem to solve
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    May 28 '17 at 16:41






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Let us define $Phi(n,m)$ as the number of positive integers coprime to $n$ and not exceeding $m$. Then the above gives us $$Phi(n,m) = biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorcdot varphi(n) + Phibiggl(n, m - ncdot biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorBiggr).$$ Assuming one knows $varphi(n)$, the problem is then to find $Phi(n,r)$ for $0 leqslant r < n$. If the numbers coprime to $n$ were evenly distributed, then $Phi(n,r)$ would be close to $fracrn-1cdot varphi(n)$. But since the numbers coprime to $n$ are in general not very close to being evenly distributed,
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 17:35













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$



Let $m$ and $n$ be two integers such that $m>n$. Then find the number of integers less than $m$ and relatively prime to $n$.




I had come across a problem of this type with specific values for $m$ and $n$, unfortunately, the values I don't remember anymore. So I asked this general question. How to solve this type of question?



My thoughts are that we need to count the numbers. So we can count the number of integers less than $m$ and relatively prime to $m$ using Euler's totient function. Now among those numbers, also belongs the numbers which are relatively prime to $n$. We can also find the numbers less than $n$ and relatively prime to $n$. That will give a rough estimation. But how do we know about the actual number of such integers? Can anybody help me with this?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





Let $m$ and $n$ be two integers such that $m>n$. Then find the number of integers less than $m$ and relatively prime to $n$.




I had come across a problem of this type with specific values for $m$ and $n$, unfortunately, the values I don't remember anymore. So I asked this general question. How to solve this type of question?



My thoughts are that we need to count the numbers. So we can count the number of integers less than $m$ and relatively prime to $m$ using Euler's totient function. Now among those numbers, also belongs the numbers which are relatively prime to $n$. We can also find the numbers less than $n$ and relatively prime to $n$. That will give a rough estimation. But how do we know about the actual number of such integers? Can anybody help me with this?



Thanks.







number-theory totient-function coprime






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked May 28 '17 at 15:13









Kushal BhuyanKushal Bhuyan

5,08021246




5,08021246







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $gcd(k,n) = gcd(k + n, n)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 15:23










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer can you elaborate a bit more on how this relation will help me, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    May 28 '17 at 15:29










  • $begingroup$
    It tells you how many integers $an < k leqslant (a+1)n$ are coprime to $n$. If $m$ is a multiple of $n$, that finishes it. If $m = qcdot n + r$ with $0 < r < n$, the remaining part of the problem is difficult.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer if $m$ is not a multiple of $n$, then how difficult is the problem to solve
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    May 28 '17 at 16:41






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Let us define $Phi(n,m)$ as the number of positive integers coprime to $n$ and not exceeding $m$. Then the above gives us $$Phi(n,m) = biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorcdot varphi(n) + Phibiggl(n, m - ncdot biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorBiggr).$$ Assuming one knows $varphi(n)$, the problem is then to find $Phi(n,r)$ for $0 leqslant r < n$. If the numbers coprime to $n$ were evenly distributed, then $Phi(n,r)$ would be close to $fracrn-1cdot varphi(n)$. But since the numbers coprime to $n$ are in general not very close to being evenly distributed,
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 17:35












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $gcd(k,n) = gcd(k + n, n)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 15:23










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer can you elaborate a bit more on how this relation will help me, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    May 28 '17 at 15:29










  • $begingroup$
    It tells you how many integers $an < k leqslant (a+1)n$ are coprime to $n$. If $m$ is a multiple of $n$, that finishes it. If $m = qcdot n + r$ with $0 < r < n$, the remaining part of the problem is difficult.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer if $m$ is not a multiple of $n$, then how difficult is the problem to solve
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    May 28 '17 at 16:41






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Let us define $Phi(n,m)$ as the number of positive integers coprime to $n$ and not exceeding $m$. Then the above gives us $$Phi(n,m) = biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorcdot varphi(n) + Phibiggl(n, m - ncdot biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorBiggr).$$ Assuming one knows $varphi(n)$, the problem is then to find $Phi(n,r)$ for $0 leqslant r < n$. If the numbers coprime to $n$ were evenly distributed, then $Phi(n,r)$ would be close to $fracrn-1cdot varphi(n)$. But since the numbers coprime to $n$ are in general not very close to being evenly distributed,
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    May 28 '17 at 17:35







1




1




$begingroup$
Note that $gcd(k,n) = gcd(k + n, n)$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
May 28 '17 at 15:23




$begingroup$
Note that $gcd(k,n) = gcd(k + n, n)$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
May 28 '17 at 15:23












$begingroup$
@DanielFischer can you elaborate a bit more on how this relation will help me, please?
$endgroup$
– Kushal Bhuyan
May 28 '17 at 15:29




$begingroup$
@DanielFischer can you elaborate a bit more on how this relation will help me, please?
$endgroup$
– Kushal Bhuyan
May 28 '17 at 15:29












$begingroup$
It tells you how many integers $an < k leqslant (a+1)n$ are coprime to $n$. If $m$ is a multiple of $n$, that finishes it. If $m = qcdot n + r$ with $0 < r < n$, the remaining part of the problem is difficult.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
May 28 '17 at 15:32




$begingroup$
It tells you how many integers $an < k leqslant (a+1)n$ are coprime to $n$. If $m$ is a multiple of $n$, that finishes it. If $m = qcdot n + r$ with $0 < r < n$, the remaining part of the problem is difficult.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
May 28 '17 at 15:32












$begingroup$
@DanielFischer if $m$ is not a multiple of $n$, then how difficult is the problem to solve
$endgroup$
– Kushal Bhuyan
May 28 '17 at 16:41




$begingroup$
@DanielFischer if $m$ is not a multiple of $n$, then how difficult is the problem to solve
$endgroup$
– Kushal Bhuyan
May 28 '17 at 16:41




3




3




$begingroup$
Let us define $Phi(n,m)$ as the number of positive integers coprime to $n$ and not exceeding $m$. Then the above gives us $$Phi(n,m) = biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorcdot varphi(n) + Phibiggl(n, m - ncdot biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorBiggr).$$ Assuming one knows $varphi(n)$, the problem is then to find $Phi(n,r)$ for $0 leqslant r < n$. If the numbers coprime to $n$ were evenly distributed, then $Phi(n,r)$ would be close to $fracrn-1cdot varphi(n)$. But since the numbers coprime to $n$ are in general not very close to being evenly distributed,
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
May 28 '17 at 17:35




$begingroup$
Let us define $Phi(n,m)$ as the number of positive integers coprime to $n$ and not exceeding $m$. Then the above gives us $$Phi(n,m) = biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorcdot varphi(n) + Phibiggl(n, m - ncdot biggllfloor fracmnbiggrrfloorBiggr).$$ Assuming one knows $varphi(n)$, the problem is then to find $Phi(n,r)$ for $0 leqslant r < n$. If the numbers coprime to $n$ were evenly distributed, then $Phi(n,r)$ would be close to $fracrn-1cdot varphi(n)$. But since the numbers coprime to $n$ are in general not very close to being evenly distributed,
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
May 28 '17 at 17:35










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

If primes $p_1, p_2$ are the only prime factors of $n$, then we get numbers relatively prime to $n$ and less than $m$ are (assuming $p_1, p_2$ are not factors of $m$):



$$m - lfloorfracmp_1rfloor - lfloorfracmp_2rfloor + lfloorfracmp_1p_2rfloor$$



We can have a generalized expression for any number of prime factors of $n$ using PIE.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2300206%2fhow-many-numbers-less-than-m-and-relatively-prime-to-n-where-mn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    If primes $p_1, p_2$ are the only prime factors of $n$, then we get numbers relatively prime to $n$ and less than $m$ are (assuming $p_1, p_2$ are not factors of $m$):



    $$m - lfloorfracmp_1rfloor - lfloorfracmp_2rfloor + lfloorfracmp_1p_2rfloor$$



    We can have a generalized expression for any number of prime factors of $n$ using PIE.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      If primes $p_1, p_2$ are the only prime factors of $n$, then we get numbers relatively prime to $n$ and less than $m$ are (assuming $p_1, p_2$ are not factors of $m$):



      $$m - lfloorfracmp_1rfloor - lfloorfracmp_2rfloor + lfloorfracmp_1p_2rfloor$$



      We can have a generalized expression for any number of prime factors of $n$ using PIE.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        If primes $p_1, p_2$ are the only prime factors of $n$, then we get numbers relatively prime to $n$ and less than $m$ are (assuming $p_1, p_2$ are not factors of $m$):



        $$m - lfloorfracmp_1rfloor - lfloorfracmp_2rfloor + lfloorfracmp_1p_2rfloor$$



        We can have a generalized expression for any number of prime factors of $n$ using PIE.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        If primes $p_1, p_2$ are the only prime factors of $n$, then we get numbers relatively prime to $n$ and less than $m$ are (assuming $p_1, p_2$ are not factors of $m$):



        $$m - lfloorfracmp_1rfloor - lfloorfracmp_2rfloor + lfloorfracmp_1p_2rfloor$$



        We can have a generalized expression for any number of prime factors of $n$ using PIE.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited May 28 '17 at 20:08

























        answered May 28 '17 at 20:01









        skusku

        1,013311




        1,013311



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2300206%2fhow-many-numbers-less-than-m-and-relatively-prime-to-n-where-mn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

            Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleaguesHow can I better understand manager or clients with strong accents?Adding more movement and speech at the fundamental level to a highly-sedentary job?Difficulty in understanding Manager's accent(language and communication)How to adjust yourself where your colleagues are not understanding to you?Understanding manager's expectationsForeigner and colleagues using slangHaving difficulty understanding meetingsHow do you breathe when giving a speech?Trouble Waking Up for Emergencies (On-Call)Problems with colleaguesColleagues feeling insecure when I do my work

            Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O