Validity of solution to PDE $xu_x - uu_t = t$ obtained from characteristics Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)General solution to the PDE $xU_x+yU_y=0$Linear PDE by characteristicsConfusion in college book on the introduction of PDE (method of characteristics)Describing the solution to a nonlinear PDEHomogeneous Quasi-linear PDE, Method of Characteristics.Solution of the PDE which has Cauchy Data.Method of characteristics - solution doesn't seem consistent with original PDEHow to Solve This PDE and Deal with Boundary Value Using Method of Characteristics. Work Shown.Method of Characteristics Follow-Up Questions: Why is $u(x, y) = A(x − y)$ the general solution for this PDE?PDE with Method of Characteristics and domain of solution

Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?

Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?

Why is std::move not [[nodiscard]] in C++20?

Is there any word for a place full of confusion?

Simple Line in LaTeX Help!

Constant factor of an array

Can two people see the same photon?

As a dual citizen, my US passport will expire one day after traveling to the US. Will this work?

Is there public access to the Meteor Crater in Arizona?

Monty Hall Problem-Probability Paradox

Project Euler #1 in C++

What are the main differences between the original Stargate SG-1 and the Final Cut edition?

What does Turing mean by this statement?

How many morphisms from 1 to 1+1 can there be?

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

Sally's older brother

AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network

Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

Simple HTTP Server

Caught masturbating at work

White walkers, cemeteries and wights

What does the writing on Poe's helmet say?

A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way



Validity of solution to PDE $xu_x - uu_t = t$ obtained from characteristics



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)General solution to the PDE $xU_x+yU_y=0$Linear PDE by characteristicsConfusion in college book on the introduction of PDE (method of characteristics)Describing the solution to a nonlinear PDEHomogeneous Quasi-linear PDE, Method of Characteristics.Solution of the PDE which has Cauchy Data.Method of characteristics - solution doesn't seem consistent with original PDEHow to Solve This PDE and Deal with Boundary Value Using Method of Characteristics. Work Shown.Method of Characteristics Follow-Up Questions: Why is $u(x, y) = A(x − y)$ the general solution for this PDE?PDE with Method of Characteristics and domain of solution










1












$begingroup$


I have a boundary-value problem:



$$
xu_x - uu_t = t
$$



with boundary conditions:



$$
u(1, t)= t, -infty<t<infty
$$



Finding the characteristic equations is no problem, and I get a general solution of:



$$
u(x, t) = fraccos(ln x) + sin(ln x)cos(ln x)-sin(ln x)t
$$



I have base characteristics that look like this:



enter image description here



And I know that my solution is defined only when $x>0$.



However, I am having trouble gaining any intuition on how to interpret these characteristic plots, and determining well-posedness.



So my main questions are:



  1. For this example, is the initial curve the line $t=0$?


  2. Is the solution defined everywhere for $x>0$? I would say yes.


  3. Is the solution unique? I would say no, because of the intersection of all of the base characteristics at that point on the $x$-axis implies that I can have the same solution for different characteristics.


  4. Are there restrictions on my parameters? For example can I allow my parameters to run over arbitrary intervals?


  5. Although I know the criteria for a well-posed problem, I feel like I still cannot determine whether this problem is well posed. I would say no, because it fails uniqueness.


  6. Is the solution single valued everywhere? I have no idea.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have a boundary-value problem:



    $$
    xu_x - uu_t = t
    $$



    with boundary conditions:



    $$
    u(1, t)= t, -infty<t<infty
    $$



    Finding the characteristic equations is no problem, and I get a general solution of:



    $$
    u(x, t) = fraccos(ln x) + sin(ln x)cos(ln x)-sin(ln x)t
    $$



    I have base characteristics that look like this:



    enter image description here



    And I know that my solution is defined only when $x>0$.



    However, I am having trouble gaining any intuition on how to interpret these characteristic plots, and determining well-posedness.



    So my main questions are:



    1. For this example, is the initial curve the line $t=0$?


    2. Is the solution defined everywhere for $x>0$? I would say yes.


    3. Is the solution unique? I would say no, because of the intersection of all of the base characteristics at that point on the $x$-axis implies that I can have the same solution for different characteristics.


    4. Are there restrictions on my parameters? For example can I allow my parameters to run over arbitrary intervals?


    5. Although I know the criteria for a well-posed problem, I feel like I still cannot determine whether this problem is well posed. I would say no, because it fails uniqueness.


    6. Is the solution single valued everywhere? I have no idea.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I have a boundary-value problem:



      $$
      xu_x - uu_t = t
      $$



      with boundary conditions:



      $$
      u(1, t)= t, -infty<t<infty
      $$



      Finding the characteristic equations is no problem, and I get a general solution of:



      $$
      u(x, t) = fraccos(ln x) + sin(ln x)cos(ln x)-sin(ln x)t
      $$



      I have base characteristics that look like this:



      enter image description here



      And I know that my solution is defined only when $x>0$.



      However, I am having trouble gaining any intuition on how to interpret these characteristic plots, and determining well-posedness.



      So my main questions are:



      1. For this example, is the initial curve the line $t=0$?


      2. Is the solution defined everywhere for $x>0$? I would say yes.


      3. Is the solution unique? I would say no, because of the intersection of all of the base characteristics at that point on the $x$-axis implies that I can have the same solution for different characteristics.


      4. Are there restrictions on my parameters? For example can I allow my parameters to run over arbitrary intervals?


      5. Although I know the criteria for a well-posed problem, I feel like I still cannot determine whether this problem is well posed. I would say no, because it fails uniqueness.


      6. Is the solution single valued everywhere? I have no idea.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have a boundary-value problem:



      $$
      xu_x - uu_t = t
      $$



      with boundary conditions:



      $$
      u(1, t)= t, -infty<t<infty
      $$



      Finding the characteristic equations is no problem, and I get a general solution of:



      $$
      u(x, t) = fraccos(ln x) + sin(ln x)cos(ln x)-sin(ln x)t
      $$



      I have base characteristics that look like this:



      enter image description here



      And I know that my solution is defined only when $x>0$.



      However, I am having trouble gaining any intuition on how to interpret these characteristic plots, and determining well-posedness.



      So my main questions are:



      1. For this example, is the initial curve the line $t=0$?


      2. Is the solution defined everywhere for $x>0$? I would say yes.


      3. Is the solution unique? I would say no, because of the intersection of all of the base characteristics at that point on the $x$-axis implies that I can have the same solution for different characteristics.


      4. Are there restrictions on my parameters? For example can I allow my parameters to run over arbitrary intervals?


      5. Although I know the criteria for a well-posed problem, I feel like I still cannot determine whether this problem is well posed. I would say no, because it fails uniqueness.


      6. Is the solution single valued everywhere? I have no idea.







      pde boundary-value-problem characteristics






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 3 at 9:40









      Harry49

      8,90331346




      8,90331346










      asked Apr 2 at 10:31









      monkeyofsciencemonkeyofscience

      675




      675




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          For this problem, the boundary data is located along the line $x=1$. Let us apply the method of characteristics:




          • $fractext d xtext d s = x$. Letting $x(0)=1$ we know $x(s) = e^s$.


          • $fractext d ttext d s = -u$ and $fractext d utext d s = t$. Letting $t(0)=t_0$ and $u(0)=t_0$, we know $t(s) = t_0 left(cos s - sin sright)$ and $u(s) = t_0 left(cos s + sin sright)$.

          The expression of $x(s)$ gives $s = ln x$ for positive $x$. Combining the expressions of $t(s)$ and $x(s)$, one obtains indeed the expression of the solution $u(x,t)$ in OP.



          Now, let us analyze the expression of characteristic curves, which tell how the boundary information located at $x=1$ propagates in the $x$-$t$ plane. These curves are expressed by the equations $t = t_0 left(cosln x - sinln xright)$ where $t_0 in Bbb R$, and they carry the information $u = t_0 left(cosln x + sinln xright)$. All these curves intersect at the roots of the function $x mapsto cosln x - sinln x$, i.e., at the abscissas $x_n = e^pi/4 + npi$ with $nin Bbb Z$. At the abscissas $x_n$, the characteristic curves carry the value $u = pm t_0sqrt2$. Therefore, the classical solution $u(x,t)$ deduced from the characteristics is multivalued at the abscissas $x_n$. Since the boundary-value problem sets the data at $x=1$, we can increase $x$ until the solution becomes multivalued at $x_0 = e^5pi/4 approx 2.19$, and we can decrease $x$ until $x_-1 = e^-3pi/4 approx 0.095$ only. The classical solution is only valid for $s$ within the interval $]-3pi/4, 5pi/4[$, such that $x$ belongs to $]x_-1, x_0[$.



          The boundary-value problem is well-posed, but the solution blows up at some point. With the present boundary data located at $x=1$, it does not make sense to look for values of $s < -3pi/4$ or $s > 5pi/4$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, that clears up a few things. So is this not a well-posed problem?
            $endgroup$
            – monkeyofscience
            Apr 2 at 17:57










          • $begingroup$
            What about those values above $5pi/4$? For example, if I expand the $x$-axis, the curves cross the $t=0$ line again. So is the solution single-valued everywhere within these intervals? And since each characteristic intersects the plane at more than one point, ie different values of x, and the intersection are distinct, does this not mean it is ill-posed?
            $endgroup$
            – monkeyofscience
            Apr 3 at 2:06










          • $begingroup$
            @monkeyofscience After the solution is blown up (e.g., $s > 5pi/4$), there is no more solution. The picture is similar to the Riccati ODE $y' = y^2$ with $y(0) = 1$, which solution $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ blows up at $t=1$. We can indeed plot the function $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ for $t>1$, but this part of the solution is no longer related to the original IVP.
            $endgroup$
            – Harry49
            Apr 3 at 8:09












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171700%2fvalidity-of-solution-to-pde-xu-x-uu-t-t-obtained-from-characteristics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          For this problem, the boundary data is located along the line $x=1$. Let us apply the method of characteristics:




          • $fractext d xtext d s = x$. Letting $x(0)=1$ we know $x(s) = e^s$.


          • $fractext d ttext d s = -u$ and $fractext d utext d s = t$. Letting $t(0)=t_0$ and $u(0)=t_0$, we know $t(s) = t_0 left(cos s - sin sright)$ and $u(s) = t_0 left(cos s + sin sright)$.

          The expression of $x(s)$ gives $s = ln x$ for positive $x$. Combining the expressions of $t(s)$ and $x(s)$, one obtains indeed the expression of the solution $u(x,t)$ in OP.



          Now, let us analyze the expression of characteristic curves, which tell how the boundary information located at $x=1$ propagates in the $x$-$t$ plane. These curves are expressed by the equations $t = t_0 left(cosln x - sinln xright)$ where $t_0 in Bbb R$, and they carry the information $u = t_0 left(cosln x + sinln xright)$. All these curves intersect at the roots of the function $x mapsto cosln x - sinln x$, i.e., at the abscissas $x_n = e^pi/4 + npi$ with $nin Bbb Z$. At the abscissas $x_n$, the characteristic curves carry the value $u = pm t_0sqrt2$. Therefore, the classical solution $u(x,t)$ deduced from the characteristics is multivalued at the abscissas $x_n$. Since the boundary-value problem sets the data at $x=1$, we can increase $x$ until the solution becomes multivalued at $x_0 = e^5pi/4 approx 2.19$, and we can decrease $x$ until $x_-1 = e^-3pi/4 approx 0.095$ only. The classical solution is only valid for $s$ within the interval $]-3pi/4, 5pi/4[$, such that $x$ belongs to $]x_-1, x_0[$.



          The boundary-value problem is well-posed, but the solution blows up at some point. With the present boundary data located at $x=1$, it does not make sense to look for values of $s < -3pi/4$ or $s > 5pi/4$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, that clears up a few things. So is this not a well-posed problem?
            $endgroup$
            – monkeyofscience
            Apr 2 at 17:57










          • $begingroup$
            What about those values above $5pi/4$? For example, if I expand the $x$-axis, the curves cross the $t=0$ line again. So is the solution single-valued everywhere within these intervals? And since each characteristic intersects the plane at more than one point, ie different values of x, and the intersection are distinct, does this not mean it is ill-posed?
            $endgroup$
            – monkeyofscience
            Apr 3 at 2:06










          • $begingroup$
            @monkeyofscience After the solution is blown up (e.g., $s > 5pi/4$), there is no more solution. The picture is similar to the Riccati ODE $y' = y^2$ with $y(0) = 1$, which solution $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ blows up at $t=1$. We can indeed plot the function $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ for $t>1$, but this part of the solution is no longer related to the original IVP.
            $endgroup$
            – Harry49
            Apr 3 at 8:09
















          2












          $begingroup$

          For this problem, the boundary data is located along the line $x=1$. Let us apply the method of characteristics:




          • $fractext d xtext d s = x$. Letting $x(0)=1$ we know $x(s) = e^s$.


          • $fractext d ttext d s = -u$ and $fractext d utext d s = t$. Letting $t(0)=t_0$ and $u(0)=t_0$, we know $t(s) = t_0 left(cos s - sin sright)$ and $u(s) = t_0 left(cos s + sin sright)$.

          The expression of $x(s)$ gives $s = ln x$ for positive $x$. Combining the expressions of $t(s)$ and $x(s)$, one obtains indeed the expression of the solution $u(x,t)$ in OP.



          Now, let us analyze the expression of characteristic curves, which tell how the boundary information located at $x=1$ propagates in the $x$-$t$ plane. These curves are expressed by the equations $t = t_0 left(cosln x - sinln xright)$ where $t_0 in Bbb R$, and they carry the information $u = t_0 left(cosln x + sinln xright)$. All these curves intersect at the roots of the function $x mapsto cosln x - sinln x$, i.e., at the abscissas $x_n = e^pi/4 + npi$ with $nin Bbb Z$. At the abscissas $x_n$, the characteristic curves carry the value $u = pm t_0sqrt2$. Therefore, the classical solution $u(x,t)$ deduced from the characteristics is multivalued at the abscissas $x_n$. Since the boundary-value problem sets the data at $x=1$, we can increase $x$ until the solution becomes multivalued at $x_0 = e^5pi/4 approx 2.19$, and we can decrease $x$ until $x_-1 = e^-3pi/4 approx 0.095$ only. The classical solution is only valid for $s$ within the interval $]-3pi/4, 5pi/4[$, such that $x$ belongs to $]x_-1, x_0[$.



          The boundary-value problem is well-posed, but the solution blows up at some point. With the present boundary data located at $x=1$, it does not make sense to look for values of $s < -3pi/4$ or $s > 5pi/4$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, that clears up a few things. So is this not a well-posed problem?
            $endgroup$
            – monkeyofscience
            Apr 2 at 17:57










          • $begingroup$
            What about those values above $5pi/4$? For example, if I expand the $x$-axis, the curves cross the $t=0$ line again. So is the solution single-valued everywhere within these intervals? And since each characteristic intersects the plane at more than one point, ie different values of x, and the intersection are distinct, does this not mean it is ill-posed?
            $endgroup$
            – monkeyofscience
            Apr 3 at 2:06










          • $begingroup$
            @monkeyofscience After the solution is blown up (e.g., $s > 5pi/4$), there is no more solution. The picture is similar to the Riccati ODE $y' = y^2$ with $y(0) = 1$, which solution $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ blows up at $t=1$. We can indeed plot the function $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ for $t>1$, but this part of the solution is no longer related to the original IVP.
            $endgroup$
            – Harry49
            Apr 3 at 8:09














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          For this problem, the boundary data is located along the line $x=1$. Let us apply the method of characteristics:




          • $fractext d xtext d s = x$. Letting $x(0)=1$ we know $x(s) = e^s$.


          • $fractext d ttext d s = -u$ and $fractext d utext d s = t$. Letting $t(0)=t_0$ and $u(0)=t_0$, we know $t(s) = t_0 left(cos s - sin sright)$ and $u(s) = t_0 left(cos s + sin sright)$.

          The expression of $x(s)$ gives $s = ln x$ for positive $x$. Combining the expressions of $t(s)$ and $x(s)$, one obtains indeed the expression of the solution $u(x,t)$ in OP.



          Now, let us analyze the expression of characteristic curves, which tell how the boundary information located at $x=1$ propagates in the $x$-$t$ plane. These curves are expressed by the equations $t = t_0 left(cosln x - sinln xright)$ where $t_0 in Bbb R$, and they carry the information $u = t_0 left(cosln x + sinln xright)$. All these curves intersect at the roots of the function $x mapsto cosln x - sinln x$, i.e., at the abscissas $x_n = e^pi/4 + npi$ with $nin Bbb Z$. At the abscissas $x_n$, the characteristic curves carry the value $u = pm t_0sqrt2$. Therefore, the classical solution $u(x,t)$ deduced from the characteristics is multivalued at the abscissas $x_n$. Since the boundary-value problem sets the data at $x=1$, we can increase $x$ until the solution becomes multivalued at $x_0 = e^5pi/4 approx 2.19$, and we can decrease $x$ until $x_-1 = e^-3pi/4 approx 0.095$ only. The classical solution is only valid for $s$ within the interval $]-3pi/4, 5pi/4[$, such that $x$ belongs to $]x_-1, x_0[$.



          The boundary-value problem is well-posed, but the solution blows up at some point. With the present boundary data located at $x=1$, it does not make sense to look for values of $s < -3pi/4$ or $s > 5pi/4$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          For this problem, the boundary data is located along the line $x=1$. Let us apply the method of characteristics:




          • $fractext d xtext d s = x$. Letting $x(0)=1$ we know $x(s) = e^s$.


          • $fractext d ttext d s = -u$ and $fractext d utext d s = t$. Letting $t(0)=t_0$ and $u(0)=t_0$, we know $t(s) = t_0 left(cos s - sin sright)$ and $u(s) = t_0 left(cos s + sin sright)$.

          The expression of $x(s)$ gives $s = ln x$ for positive $x$. Combining the expressions of $t(s)$ and $x(s)$, one obtains indeed the expression of the solution $u(x,t)$ in OP.



          Now, let us analyze the expression of characteristic curves, which tell how the boundary information located at $x=1$ propagates in the $x$-$t$ plane. These curves are expressed by the equations $t = t_0 left(cosln x - sinln xright)$ where $t_0 in Bbb R$, and they carry the information $u = t_0 left(cosln x + sinln xright)$. All these curves intersect at the roots of the function $x mapsto cosln x - sinln x$, i.e., at the abscissas $x_n = e^pi/4 + npi$ with $nin Bbb Z$. At the abscissas $x_n$, the characteristic curves carry the value $u = pm t_0sqrt2$. Therefore, the classical solution $u(x,t)$ deduced from the characteristics is multivalued at the abscissas $x_n$. Since the boundary-value problem sets the data at $x=1$, we can increase $x$ until the solution becomes multivalued at $x_0 = e^5pi/4 approx 2.19$, and we can decrease $x$ until $x_-1 = e^-3pi/4 approx 0.095$ only. The classical solution is only valid for $s$ within the interval $]-3pi/4, 5pi/4[$, such that $x$ belongs to $]x_-1, x_0[$.



          The boundary-value problem is well-posed, but the solution blows up at some point. With the present boundary data located at $x=1$, it does not make sense to look for values of $s < -3pi/4$ or $s > 5pi/4$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Apr 3 at 9:40

























          answered Apr 2 at 14:13









          Harry49Harry49

          8,90331346




          8,90331346











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, that clears up a few things. So is this not a well-posed problem?
            $endgroup$
            – monkeyofscience
            Apr 2 at 17:57










          • $begingroup$
            What about those values above $5pi/4$? For example, if I expand the $x$-axis, the curves cross the $t=0$ line again. So is the solution single-valued everywhere within these intervals? And since each characteristic intersects the plane at more than one point, ie different values of x, and the intersection are distinct, does this not mean it is ill-posed?
            $endgroup$
            – monkeyofscience
            Apr 3 at 2:06










          • $begingroup$
            @monkeyofscience After the solution is blown up (e.g., $s > 5pi/4$), there is no more solution. The picture is similar to the Riccati ODE $y' = y^2$ with $y(0) = 1$, which solution $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ blows up at $t=1$. We can indeed plot the function $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ for $t>1$, but this part of the solution is no longer related to the original IVP.
            $endgroup$
            – Harry49
            Apr 3 at 8:09

















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, that clears up a few things. So is this not a well-posed problem?
            $endgroup$
            – monkeyofscience
            Apr 2 at 17:57










          • $begingroup$
            What about those values above $5pi/4$? For example, if I expand the $x$-axis, the curves cross the $t=0$ line again. So is the solution single-valued everywhere within these intervals? And since each characteristic intersects the plane at more than one point, ie different values of x, and the intersection are distinct, does this not mean it is ill-posed?
            $endgroup$
            – monkeyofscience
            Apr 3 at 2:06










          • $begingroup$
            @monkeyofscience After the solution is blown up (e.g., $s > 5pi/4$), there is no more solution. The picture is similar to the Riccati ODE $y' = y^2$ with $y(0) = 1$, which solution $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ blows up at $t=1$. We can indeed plot the function $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ for $t>1$, but this part of the solution is no longer related to the original IVP.
            $endgroup$
            – Harry49
            Apr 3 at 8:09
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks, that clears up a few things. So is this not a well-posed problem?
          $endgroup$
          – monkeyofscience
          Apr 2 at 17:57




          $begingroup$
          Thanks, that clears up a few things. So is this not a well-posed problem?
          $endgroup$
          – monkeyofscience
          Apr 2 at 17:57












          $begingroup$
          What about those values above $5pi/4$? For example, if I expand the $x$-axis, the curves cross the $t=0$ line again. So is the solution single-valued everywhere within these intervals? And since each characteristic intersects the plane at more than one point, ie different values of x, and the intersection are distinct, does this not mean it is ill-posed?
          $endgroup$
          – monkeyofscience
          Apr 3 at 2:06




          $begingroup$
          What about those values above $5pi/4$? For example, if I expand the $x$-axis, the curves cross the $t=0$ line again. So is the solution single-valued everywhere within these intervals? And since each characteristic intersects the plane at more than one point, ie different values of x, and the intersection are distinct, does this not mean it is ill-posed?
          $endgroup$
          – monkeyofscience
          Apr 3 at 2:06












          $begingroup$
          @monkeyofscience After the solution is blown up (e.g., $s > 5pi/4$), there is no more solution. The picture is similar to the Riccati ODE $y' = y^2$ with $y(0) = 1$, which solution $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ blows up at $t=1$. We can indeed plot the function $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ for $t>1$, but this part of the solution is no longer related to the original IVP.
          $endgroup$
          – Harry49
          Apr 3 at 8:09





          $begingroup$
          @monkeyofscience After the solution is blown up (e.g., $s > 5pi/4$), there is no more solution. The picture is similar to the Riccati ODE $y' = y^2$ with $y(0) = 1$, which solution $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ blows up at $t=1$. We can indeed plot the function $tmapsto 1/(1-t)$ for $t>1$, but this part of the solution is no longer related to the original IVP.
          $endgroup$
          – Harry49
          Apr 3 at 8:09


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171700%2fvalidity-of-solution-to-pde-xu-x-uu-t-t-obtained-from-characteristics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

          Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O

          Serbia Índice Etimología Historia Geografía Entorno natural División administrativa Política Demografía Economía Cultura Deportes Véase también Notas Referencias Bibliografía Enlaces externos Menú de navegación44°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.46666666666744°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.466666666667U.S. Department of Commerce (2015)«Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2018»Kosovo-Metohija.Neutralna Srbija u NATO okruzenju.The SerbsTheories on the Origin of the Serbs.Serbia.Earls: Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases.Egeo y Balcanes.Kalemegdan.Southern Pannonia during the age of the Great Migrations.Culture in Serbia.History.The Serbian Origin of the Montenegrins.Nemanjics' period (1186-1353).Stefan Uros (1355-1371).Serbian medieval history.Habsburg–Ottoman Wars (1525–1718).The Ottoman Empire, 1700-1922.The First Serbian Uprising.Miloš, prince of Serbia.3. Bosnia-Hercegovina and the Congress of Berlin.The Balkan Wars and the Partition of Macedonia.The Falcon and the Eagle: Montenegro and Austria-Hungary, 1908-1914.Typhus fever on the eastern front in World War I.Anniversary of WWI battle marked in Serbia.La derrota austriaca en los Balcanes. Fin del Imperio Austro-Húngaro.Imperio austriaco y Reino de Hungría.Los tiempos modernos: del capitalismo a la globalización, siglos XVII al XXI.The period of Croatia within ex-Yugoslavia.Yugoslavia: Much in a Name.Las dictaduras europeas.Croacia: mito y realidad."Crods ask arms".Prólogo a la invasión.La campaña de los Balcanes.La resistencia en Yugoslavia.Jasenovac Research Institute.Día en memoria de las víctimas del genocidio en la Segunda Guerra Mundial.El infierno estuvo en Jasenovac.Croacia empieza a «desenterrar» a sus muertos de Jasenovac.World fascism: a historical encyclopedia, Volumen 1.Tito. Josip Broz.El nuevo orden y la resistencia.La conquista del poder.Algunos aspectos de la economía yugoslava a mediados de 1962.Albania-Kosovo crisis.De Kosovo a Kosova: una visión demográfica.La crisis de la economía yugoslava y la política de "estabilización".Milosevic: el poder de un absolutista."Serbia under Milošević: politics in the 1990s"Milosevic cavó en Kosovo la tumba de la antigua Yugoslavia.La ONU exculpa a Serbia de genocidio en la guerra de Bosnia.Slobodan Milosevic, el burócrata que supo usar el odio.Es la fuerza contra el sufrimiento de muchos inocentes.Matanza de civiles al bombardear la OTAN un puente mientras pasaba un tren.Las consecuencias negativas de los bombardeos de Yugoslavia se sentirán aún durante largo tiempo.Kostunica advierte que la misión de Europa en Kosovo es ilegal.Las 24 horas más largas en la vida de Slobodan Milosevic.Serbia declara la guerra a la mafia por matar a Djindjic.Tadic presentará "quizás en diciembre" la solicitud de entrada en la UE.Montenegro declara su independencia de Serbia.Serbia se declara estado soberano tras separación de Montenegro.«Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion)»Mladic pasa por el médico antes de la audiencia para extraditarloDatos de Serbia y Kosovo.The Carpathian Mountains.Position, Relief, Climate.Transport.Finding birds in Serbia.U Srbiji do 2010. godine 10% teritorije nacionalni parkovi.Geography.Serbia: Climate.Variability of Climate In Serbia In The Second Half of The 20thc Entury.BASIC CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE TERRITORY OF SERBIA.Fauna y flora: Serbia.Serbia and Montenegro.Información general sobre Serbia.Republic of Serbia Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA).Serbia recycling 15% of waste.Reform process of the Serbian energy sector.20-MW Wind Project Being Developed in Serbia.Las Naciones Unidas. Paz para Kosovo.Aniversario sin fiesta.Population by national or ethnic groups by Census 2002.Article 7. Coat of arms, flag and national anthem.Serbia, flag of.Historia.«Serbia and Montenegro in Pictures»Serbia.Serbia aprueba su nueva Constitución con un apoyo de más del 50%.Serbia. Population.«El nacionalista Nikolic gana las elecciones presidenciales en Serbia»El europeísta Borís Tadic gana la segunda vuelta de las presidenciales serbias.Aleksandar Vucic, de ultranacionalista serbio a fervoroso europeístaKostunica condena la declaración del "falso estado" de Kosovo.Comienza el debate sobre la independencia de Kosovo en el TIJ.La Corte Internacional de Justicia dice que Kosovo no violó el derecho internacional al declarar su independenciaKosovo: Enviado de la ONU advierte tensiones y fragilidad.«Bruselas recomienda negociar la adhesión de Serbia tras el acuerdo sobre Kosovo»Monografía de Serbia.Bez smanjivanja Vojske Srbije.Military statistics Serbia and Montenegro.Šutanovac: Vojni budžet za 2009. godinu 70 milijardi dinara.Serbia-Montenegro shortens obligatory military service to six months.No hay justicia para las víctimas de los bombardeos de la OTAN.Zapatero reitera la negativa de España a reconocer la independencia de Kosovo.Anniversary of the signing of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement.Detenido en Serbia Radovan Karadzic, el criminal de guerra más buscado de Europa."Serbia presentará su candidatura de acceso a la UE antes de fin de año".Serbia solicita la adhesión a la UE.Detenido el exgeneral serbobosnio Ratko Mladic, principal acusado del genocidio en los Balcanes«Lista de todos los Estados Miembros de las Naciones Unidas que son parte o signatarios en los diversos instrumentos de derechos humanos de las Naciones Unidas»versión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre la Eliminación de todas las Formas de Discriminación contra la MujerConvención contra la tortura y otros tratos o penas crueles, inhumanos o degradantesversión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con DiscapacidadEl ACNUR recibe con beneplácito el envío de tropas de la OTAN a Kosovo y se prepara ante una posible llegada de refugiados a Serbia.Kosovo.- El jefe de la Minuk denuncia que los serbios boicotearon las legislativas por 'presiones'.Bosnia and Herzegovina. Population.Datos básicos de Montenegro, historia y evolución política.Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa global de fecundidad (por 1000 habitantes).Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa bruta de mortalidad (por 1000 habitantes).Population.Falleció el patriarca de la Iglesia Ortodoxa serbia.Atacan en Kosovo autobuses con peregrinos tras la investidura del patriarca serbio IrinejSerbian in Hungary.Tasas de cambio."Kosovo es de todos sus ciudadanos".Report for Serbia.Country groups by income.GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP) OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA 1997–2007.Economic Trends in the Republic of Serbia 2006.National Accounts Statitics.Саопштења за јавност.GDP per inhabitant varied by one to six across the EU27 Member States.Un pacto de estabilidad para Serbia.Unemployment rate rises in Serbia.Serbia, Belarus agree free trade to woo investors.Serbia, Turkey call investors to Serbia.Success Stories.U.S. Private Investment in Serbia and Montenegro.Positive trend.Banks in Serbia.La Cámara de Comercio acompaña a empresas madrileñas a Serbia y Croacia.Serbia Industries.Energy and mining.Agriculture.Late crops, fruit and grapes output, 2008.Rebranding Serbia: A Hobby Shortly to Become a Full-Time Job.Final data on livestock statistics, 2008.Serbian cell-phone users.U Srbiji sve više računara.Телекомуникације.U Srbiji 27 odsto gradjana koristi Internet.Serbia and Montenegro.Тренд гледаности програма РТС-а у 2008. и 2009.години.Serbian railways.General Terms.El mercado del transporte aéreo en Serbia.Statistics.Vehículos de motor registrados.Planes ambiciosos para el transporte fluvial.Turismo.Turistički promet u Republici Srbiji u periodu januar-novembar 2007. godine.Your Guide to Culture.Novi Sad - city of culture.Nis - european crossroads.Serbia. Properties inscribed on the World Heritage List .Stari Ras and Sopoćani.Studenica Monastery.Medieval Monuments in Kosovo.Gamzigrad-Romuliana, Palace of Galerius.Skiing and snowboarding in Kopaonik.Tara.New7Wonders of Nature Finalists.Pilgrimage of Saint Sava.Exit Festival: Best european festival.Banje u Srbiji.«The Encyclopedia of world history»Culture.Centenario del arte serbio.«Djordje Andrejevic Kun: el único pintor de los brigadistas yugoslavos de la guerra civil española»About the museum.The collections.Miroslav Gospel – Manuscript from 1180.Historicity in the Serbo-Croatian Heroic Epic.Culture and Sport.Conversación con el rector del Seminario San Sava.'Reina Margot' funde drama, historia y gesto con música de Goran Bregovic.Serbia gana Eurovisión y España decepciona de nuevo con un vigésimo puesto.Home.Story.Emir Kusturica.Tercer oro para Paskaljevic.Nikola Tesla Year.Home.Tesla, un genio tomado por loco.Aniversario de la muerte de Nikola Tesla.El Museo Nikola Tesla en Belgrado.El inventor del mundo actual.República de Serbia.University of Belgrade official statistics.University of Novi Sad.University of Kragujevac.University of Nis.Comida. Cocina serbia.Cooking.Montenegro se convertirá en el miembro 204 del movimiento olímpico.España, campeona de Europa de baloncesto.El Partizan de Belgrado se corona campeón por octava vez consecutiva.Serbia se clasifica para el Mundial de 2010 de Sudáfrica.Serbia Name Squad For Northern Ireland And South Korea Tests.Fútbol.- El Partizán de Belgrado se proclama campeón de la Liga serbia.Clasificacion final Mundial de balonmano Croacia 2009.Serbia vence a España y se consagra campeón mundial de waterpolo.Novak Djokovic no convence pero gana en Australia.Gana Ana Ivanovic el Roland Garros.Serena Williams gana el US Open por tercera vez.Biography.Bradt Travel Guide SerbiaThe Encyclopedia of World War IGobierno de SerbiaPortal del Gobierno de SerbiaPresidencia de SerbiaAsamblea Nacional SerbiaMinisterio de Asuntos exteriores de SerbiaBanco Nacional de SerbiaAgencia Serbia para la Promoción de la Inversión y la ExportaciónOficina de Estadísticas de SerbiaCIA. Factbook 2008Organización nacional de turismo de SerbiaDiscover SerbiaConoce SerbiaNoticias de SerbiaSerbiaWorldCat1512028760000 0000 9526 67094054598-2n8519591900570825ge1309191004530741010url17413117006669D055771Serbia