About the Radius of Convergence of $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $ Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Confusion on complex power seriesIf $f(z):=sum_n=0^infty a_nz^-n$ is compact convergent, then $f$ is holomorphicImplications from $f(z)inmathbbR Longleftrightarrow zin mathbbR$Help understand part of the proof. Radius of convergence is $frac1a_n$Radius of convergence of the power series $sum_n=1^inftya_nz^n^2$$prod_n=1^inftyfraca_nfracz-a_noverlinea_n z-1$ convergenceRadius of convergence of function strictly greater than $1$ or not?The radius of convergence of complex power seriesFamily $mathcalF$ of functions $f(z)=sum_n=1^inftya_nz^n$ on open disk satisfies $|a_n|<n$ then every sequence has convergent subsequence.Question related to radius of convergence

"klopfte jemand" or "jemand klopfte"?

What is the "studentd" process?

My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?

Found this skink in my tomato plant bucket. Is he trapped? Or could he leave if he wanted?

Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?

What initially awakened the Balrog?

Can you force honesty by using the Speak with Dead and Zone of Truth spells together?

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

Tannaka duality for semisimple groups

A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way

Co-worker has annoying ringtone

Test print coming out spongy

Why datecode is SO IMPORTANT to chip manufacturers?

Mounting TV on a weird wall that has some material between the drywall and stud

How did Fremen produce and carry enough thumpers to use Sandworms as de facto Ubers?

AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network

What is the chair depicted in Cesare Maccari's 1889 painting "Cicerone denuncia Catilina"?

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

Resize vertical bars (absolute-value symbols)

What to do with repeated rejections for phd position

Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?

Relating to the President and obstruction, were Mueller's conclusions preordained?

One-one communication

Would color changing eyes affect vision?



About the Radius of Convergence of $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Confusion on complex power seriesIf $f(z):=sum_n=0^infty a_nz^-n$ is compact convergent, then $f$ is holomorphicImplications from $f(z)inmathbbR Longleftrightarrow zin mathbbR$Help understand part of the proof. Radius of convergence is $frac1limsup $Radius of convergence of the power series $sum_n=1^inftya_nz^n^2$$prod_n=1^inftyfraca_nfracz-a_noverlinea_n z-1$ convergenceRadius of convergence of function strictly greater than $1$ or not?The radius of convergence of complex power seriesFamily $mathcalF$ of functions $f(z)=sum_n=1^inftya_nz^n$ on open disk satisfies $|a_n|<n$ then every sequence has convergent subsequence.Question related to radius of convergence










2












$begingroup$



Fix $ delta>0 $ and let
$$ Omega=<1 cupz-1 .$$
Assume that $ f(z) $ is a holomorphic function on $ Omega $ whihc has a Taylor series expansion $ sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ at $ z=0 $ such that $ a_n $ is a non-negative real number for all $ nge 0 $.



(A) Prove that the derivatives $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and, moreover, $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_m $$ for all $ 0le kle m $.



(B) Prove that $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $ has radius of convergence strictly greater than $ 1 $.





My attempt:



(A) Since $ f(z)=sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ when $ |z|<1 $, we have



beginalign
f(z)&=sum_nge 0a_n[(z-1)+1]^n\
&=sum_nge 0a_nsum_m=0^nbinomnm(z-1)^m\
&=sum_kge 0left[sum_nge ka_nbinomnkright](z-1)^k\
&=sum_kge 0fracf^(k)(1)k!(z-1)^k
endalign

for $$ zinzcap z: .$$
beginalign
&implies fracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nbinomnk\
&impliesfracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nfracn!k!(n-k)!\
&implies f^(k)(1)=sum_nge ka_nfracn!(n-k)!
endalign



Hence $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and since $ a_nge 0 $, we have
$$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_mquadtextfor all 0le kle m .$$ So we have proved (A).



(B) Since there must exist at least one singular point on the boundary of the disk of convergence, it suffices to prove that there exists a singular point on $ zinmathbb C: $. Then I am stuck...... Any hint?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$



    Fix $ delta>0 $ and let
    $$ Omega=<1 cupz-1 .$$
    Assume that $ f(z) $ is a holomorphic function on $ Omega $ whihc has a Taylor series expansion $ sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ at $ z=0 $ such that $ a_n $ is a non-negative real number for all $ nge 0 $.



    (A) Prove that the derivatives $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and, moreover, $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_m $$ for all $ 0le kle m $.



    (B) Prove that $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $ has radius of convergence strictly greater than $ 1 $.





    My attempt:



    (A) Since $ f(z)=sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ when $ |z|<1 $, we have



    beginalign
    f(z)&=sum_nge 0a_n[(z-1)+1]^n\
    &=sum_nge 0a_nsum_m=0^nbinomnm(z-1)^m\
    &=sum_kge 0left[sum_nge ka_nbinomnkright](z-1)^k\
    &=sum_kge 0fracf^(k)(1)k!(z-1)^k
    endalign

    for $$ zinzcap z: .$$
    beginalign
    &implies fracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nbinomnk\
    &impliesfracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nfracn!k!(n-k)!\
    &implies f^(k)(1)=sum_nge ka_nfracn!(n-k)!
    endalign



    Hence $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and since $ a_nge 0 $, we have
    $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_mquadtextfor all 0le kle m .$$ So we have proved (A).



    (B) Since there must exist at least one singular point on the boundary of the disk of convergence, it suffices to prove that there exists a singular point on $ zinmathbb C: $. Then I am stuck...... Any hint?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$



      Fix $ delta>0 $ and let
      $$ Omega=<1 cupz-1 .$$
      Assume that $ f(z) $ is a holomorphic function on $ Omega $ whihc has a Taylor series expansion $ sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ at $ z=0 $ such that $ a_n $ is a non-negative real number for all $ nge 0 $.



      (A) Prove that the derivatives $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and, moreover, $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_m $$ for all $ 0le kle m $.



      (B) Prove that $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $ has radius of convergence strictly greater than $ 1 $.





      My attempt:



      (A) Since $ f(z)=sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ when $ |z|<1 $, we have



      beginalign
      f(z)&=sum_nge 0a_n[(z-1)+1]^n\
      &=sum_nge 0a_nsum_m=0^nbinomnm(z-1)^m\
      &=sum_kge 0left[sum_nge ka_nbinomnkright](z-1)^k\
      &=sum_kge 0fracf^(k)(1)k!(z-1)^k
      endalign

      for $$ zinzcap z: .$$
      beginalign
      &implies fracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nbinomnk\
      &impliesfracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nfracn!k!(n-k)!\
      &implies f^(k)(1)=sum_nge ka_nfracn!(n-k)!
      endalign



      Hence $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and since $ a_nge 0 $, we have
      $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_mquadtextfor all 0le kle m .$$ So we have proved (A).



      (B) Since there must exist at least one singular point on the boundary of the disk of convergence, it suffices to prove that there exists a singular point on $ zinmathbb C: $. Then I am stuck...... Any hint?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Fix $ delta>0 $ and let
      $$ Omega=<1 cupz-1 .$$
      Assume that $ f(z) $ is a holomorphic function on $ Omega $ whihc has a Taylor series expansion $ sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ at $ z=0 $ such that $ a_n $ is a non-negative real number for all $ nge 0 $.



      (A) Prove that the derivatives $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and, moreover, $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_m $$ for all $ 0le kle m $.



      (B) Prove that $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $ has radius of convergence strictly greater than $ 1 $.





      My attempt:



      (A) Since $ f(z)=sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ when $ |z|<1 $, we have



      beginalign
      f(z)&=sum_nge 0a_n[(z-1)+1]^n\
      &=sum_nge 0a_nsum_m=0^nbinomnm(z-1)^m\
      &=sum_kge 0left[sum_nge ka_nbinomnkright](z-1)^k\
      &=sum_kge 0fracf^(k)(1)k!(z-1)^k
      endalign

      for $$ zinzcap z: .$$
      beginalign
      &implies fracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nbinomnk\
      &impliesfracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nfracn!k!(n-k)!\
      &implies f^(k)(1)=sum_nge ka_nfracn!(n-k)!
      endalign



      Hence $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and since $ a_nge 0 $, we have
      $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_mquadtextfor all 0le kle m .$$ So we have proved (A).



      (B) Since there must exist at least one singular point on the boundary of the disk of convergence, it suffices to prove that there exists a singular point on $ zinmathbb C: $. Then I am stuck...... Any hint?







      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 8 at 16:00







      user549397

















      asked Apr 2 at 8:24









      user549397user549397

      1,7141618




      1,7141618




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Note that if $|z| < 1+delta$, beginalignsuma_nz^n &le suma_n(1+delta)^n\
          &=sum_n ge 0left(a_nsum_k=0^nbinomnkdelta^kright)\
          &=sum_kge 0left(delta^ksum_nge ka_nbinomnkright)\
          &=sum_k=0^inftyfracf^(k)(1)k!,delta^k < infty,endalign
          hence $f(z)$ has a Taylor series defined in the (open) disc with radius $1+delta$



          The switching of the double sum is allowed by the non-negativity of all terms as $a_mnge 0$ implies $$sum_m(sum_na_mn)=sum_n(sum_ma_mn)=sup_n in I, m in Jsuma_mn$$ with supremum taken on all finite sets $I,J$ of natural numbers, the double sums being finite and equal or both infinite



          Note that this result is also known as the power series version of Landau's Theorem (Landau's Theorem being much better known for Dirichlet series where it is slightly more difficult to prove than here), stating that if a power series with radius of convergence precisely $r>0$ has non-negative coefficients (for all $n$ high enough), than it must have a singularity at $z=r$. In particular here $r=1$ cannot be the radius convergence of $f$ as $1$ is not a singular point by hypothesis.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            0












            $begingroup$

            Maybe useful idea, too long for a comment: as $f$ is holomorphic in $zinBbb C:$ the Taylor series of $f$ centered at $1$
            $$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!(z - 1)^n$$
            is convergent at $z = 1 + delta$, i.e.,
            $$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!,delta^n$$
            is convergent. The convergence of this series plus (A) maybe give a useful bound for $a_n$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171615%2fabout-the-radius-of-convergence-of-sum-n-ge-0a-n-zn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              Note that if $|z| < 1+delta$, beginalignsuma_nz^n &le suma_n(1+delta)^n\
              &=sum_n ge 0left(a_nsum_k=0^nbinomnkdelta^kright)\
              &=sum_kge 0left(delta^ksum_nge ka_nbinomnkright)\
              &=sum_k=0^inftyfracf^(k)(1)k!,delta^k < infty,endalign
              hence $f(z)$ has a Taylor series defined in the (open) disc with radius $1+delta$



              The switching of the double sum is allowed by the non-negativity of all terms as $a_mnge 0$ implies $$sum_m(sum_na_mn)=sum_n(sum_ma_mn)=sup_n in I, m in Jsuma_mn$$ with supremum taken on all finite sets $I,J$ of natural numbers, the double sums being finite and equal or both infinite



              Note that this result is also known as the power series version of Landau's Theorem (Landau's Theorem being much better known for Dirichlet series where it is slightly more difficult to prove than here), stating that if a power series with radius of convergence precisely $r>0$ has non-negative coefficients (for all $n$ high enough), than it must have a singularity at $z=r$. In particular here $r=1$ cannot be the radius convergence of $f$ as $1$ is not a singular point by hypothesis.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                Note that if $|z| < 1+delta$, beginalignsuma_nz^n &le suma_n(1+delta)^n\
                &=sum_n ge 0left(a_nsum_k=0^nbinomnkdelta^kright)\
                &=sum_kge 0left(delta^ksum_nge ka_nbinomnkright)\
                &=sum_k=0^inftyfracf^(k)(1)k!,delta^k < infty,endalign
                hence $f(z)$ has a Taylor series defined in the (open) disc with radius $1+delta$



                The switching of the double sum is allowed by the non-negativity of all terms as $a_mnge 0$ implies $$sum_m(sum_na_mn)=sum_n(sum_ma_mn)=sup_n in I, m in Jsuma_mn$$ with supremum taken on all finite sets $I,J$ of natural numbers, the double sums being finite and equal or both infinite



                Note that this result is also known as the power series version of Landau's Theorem (Landau's Theorem being much better known for Dirichlet series where it is slightly more difficult to prove than here), stating that if a power series with radius of convergence precisely $r>0$ has non-negative coefficients (for all $n$ high enough), than it must have a singularity at $z=r$. In particular here $r=1$ cannot be the radius convergence of $f$ as $1$ is not a singular point by hypothesis.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Note that if $|z| < 1+delta$, beginalignsuma_nz^n &le suma_n(1+delta)^n\
                  &=sum_n ge 0left(a_nsum_k=0^nbinomnkdelta^kright)\
                  &=sum_kge 0left(delta^ksum_nge ka_nbinomnkright)\
                  &=sum_k=0^inftyfracf^(k)(1)k!,delta^k < infty,endalign
                  hence $f(z)$ has a Taylor series defined in the (open) disc with radius $1+delta$



                  The switching of the double sum is allowed by the non-negativity of all terms as $a_mnge 0$ implies $$sum_m(sum_na_mn)=sum_n(sum_ma_mn)=sup_n in I, m in Jsuma_mn$$ with supremum taken on all finite sets $I,J$ of natural numbers, the double sums being finite and equal or both infinite



                  Note that this result is also known as the power series version of Landau's Theorem (Landau's Theorem being much better known for Dirichlet series where it is slightly more difficult to prove than here), stating that if a power series with radius of convergence precisely $r>0$ has non-negative coefficients (for all $n$ high enough), than it must have a singularity at $z=r$. In particular here $r=1$ cannot be the radius convergence of $f$ as $1$ is not a singular point by hypothesis.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Note that if $|z| < 1+delta$, beginalignsuma_nz^n &le suma_n(1+delta)^n\
                  &=sum_n ge 0left(a_nsum_k=0^nbinomnkdelta^kright)\
                  &=sum_kge 0left(delta^ksum_nge ka_nbinomnkright)\
                  &=sum_k=0^inftyfracf^(k)(1)k!,delta^k < infty,endalign
                  hence $f(z)$ has a Taylor series defined in the (open) disc with radius $1+delta$



                  The switching of the double sum is allowed by the non-negativity of all terms as $a_mnge 0$ implies $$sum_m(sum_na_mn)=sum_n(sum_ma_mn)=sup_n in I, m in Jsuma_mn$$ with supremum taken on all finite sets $I,J$ of natural numbers, the double sums being finite and equal or both infinite



                  Note that this result is also known as the power series version of Landau's Theorem (Landau's Theorem being much better known for Dirichlet series where it is slightly more difficult to prove than here), stating that if a power series with radius of convergence precisely $r>0$ has non-negative coefficients (for all $n$ high enough), than it must have a singularity at $z=r$. In particular here $r=1$ cannot be the radius convergence of $f$ as $1$ is not a singular point by hypothesis.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Apr 9 at 1:41









                  user549397

                  1,7141618




                  1,7141618










                  answered Apr 8 at 23:46









                  ConradConrad

                  1,66246




                  1,66246





















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Maybe useful idea, too long for a comment: as $f$ is holomorphic in $zinBbb C:$ the Taylor series of $f$ centered at $1$
                      $$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!(z - 1)^n$$
                      is convergent at $z = 1 + delta$, i.e.,
                      $$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!,delta^n$$
                      is convergent. The convergence of this series plus (A) maybe give a useful bound for $a_n$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Maybe useful idea, too long for a comment: as $f$ is holomorphic in $zinBbb C:$ the Taylor series of $f$ centered at $1$
                        $$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!(z - 1)^n$$
                        is convergent at $z = 1 + delta$, i.e.,
                        $$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!,delta^n$$
                        is convergent. The convergence of this series plus (A) maybe give a useful bound for $a_n$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          Maybe useful idea, too long for a comment: as $f$ is holomorphic in $zinBbb C:$ the Taylor series of $f$ centered at $1$
                          $$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!(z - 1)^n$$
                          is convergent at $z = 1 + delta$, i.e.,
                          $$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!,delta^n$$
                          is convergent. The convergence of this series plus (A) maybe give a useful bound for $a_n$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Maybe useful idea, too long for a comment: as $f$ is holomorphic in $zinBbb C:$ the Taylor series of $f$ centered at $1$
                          $$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!(z - 1)^n$$
                          is convergent at $z = 1 + delta$, i.e.,
                          $$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!,delta^n$$
                          is convergent. The convergence of this series plus (A) maybe give a useful bound for $a_n$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Apr 5 at 19:56









                          Martín-Blas Pérez PinillaMartín-Blas Pérez Pinilla

                          35.6k42972




                          35.6k42972



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171615%2fabout-the-radius-of-convergence-of-sum-n-ge-0a-n-zn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

                              Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleaguesHow can I better understand manager or clients with strong accents?Adding more movement and speech at the fundamental level to a highly-sedentary job?Difficulty in understanding Manager's accent(language and communication)How to adjust yourself where your colleagues are not understanding to you?Understanding manager's expectationsForeigner and colleagues using slangHaving difficulty understanding meetingsHow do you breathe when giving a speech?Trouble Waking Up for Emergencies (On-Call)Problems with colleaguesColleagues feeling insecure when I do my work

                              Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O