About the Radius of Convergence of $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $ Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Confusion on complex power seriesIf $f(z):=sum_n=0^infty a_nz^-n$ is compact convergent, then $f$ is holomorphicImplications from $f(z)inmathbbR Longleftrightarrow zin mathbbR$Help understand part of the proof. Radius of convergence is $frac1a_n$Radius of convergence of the power series $sum_n=1^inftya_nz^n^2$$prod_n=1^inftyfraca_nfracz-a_noverlinea_n z-1$ convergenceRadius of convergence of function strictly greater than $1$ or not?The radius of convergence of complex power seriesFamily $mathcalF$ of functions $f(z)=sum_n=1^inftya_nz^n$ on open disk satisfies $|a_n|<n$ then every sequence has convergent subsequence.Question related to radius of convergence
"klopfte jemand" or "jemand klopfte"?
What is the "studentd" process?
My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?
Found this skink in my tomato plant bucket. Is he trapped? Or could he leave if he wanted?
Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?
What initially awakened the Balrog?
Can you force honesty by using the Speak with Dead and Zone of Truth spells together?
Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?
Tannaka duality for semisimple groups
A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way
Co-worker has annoying ringtone
Test print coming out spongy
Why datecode is SO IMPORTANT to chip manufacturers?
Mounting TV on a weird wall that has some material between the drywall and stud
How did Fremen produce and carry enough thumpers to use Sandworms as de facto Ubers?
AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network
What is the chair depicted in Cesare Maccari's 1889 painting "Cicerone denuncia Catilina"?
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
Resize vertical bars (absolute-value symbols)
What to do with repeated rejections for phd position
Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?
Relating to the President and obstruction, were Mueller's conclusions preordained?
One-one communication
Would color changing eyes affect vision?
About the Radius of Convergence of $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Confusion on complex power seriesIf $f(z):=sum_n=0^infty a_nz^-n$ is compact convergent, then $f$ is holomorphicImplications from $f(z)inmathbbR Longleftrightarrow zin mathbbR$Help understand part of the proof. Radius of convergence is $frac1limsup $Radius of convergence of the power series $sum_n=1^inftya_nz^n^2$$prod_n=1^inftyfraca_nfracz-a_noverlinea_n z-1$ convergenceRadius of convergence of function strictly greater than $1$ or not?The radius of convergence of complex power seriesFamily $mathcalF$ of functions $f(z)=sum_n=1^inftya_nz^n$ on open disk satisfies $|a_n|<n$ then every sequence has convergent subsequence.Question related to radius of convergence
$begingroup$
Fix $ delta>0 $ and let
$$ Omega=<1 cupz-1 .$$
Assume that $ f(z) $ is a holomorphic function on $ Omega $ whihc has a Taylor series expansion $ sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ at $ z=0 $ such that $ a_n $ is a non-negative real number for all $ nge 0 $.
(A) Prove that the derivatives $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and, moreover, $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_m $$ for all $ 0le kle m $.
(B) Prove that $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $ has radius of convergence strictly greater than $ 1 $.
My attempt:
(A) Since $ f(z)=sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ when $ |z|<1 $, we have
beginalign
f(z)&=sum_nge 0a_n[(z-1)+1]^n\
&=sum_nge 0a_nsum_m=0^nbinomnm(z-1)^m\
&=sum_kge 0left[sum_nge ka_nbinomnkright](z-1)^k\
&=sum_kge 0fracf^(k)(1)k!(z-1)^k
endalign
for $$ zinzcap z: .$$
beginalign
&implies fracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nbinomnk\
&impliesfracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nfracn!k!(n-k)!\
&implies f^(k)(1)=sum_nge ka_nfracn!(n-k)!
endalign
Hence $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and since $ a_nge 0 $, we have
$$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_mquadtextfor all 0le kle m .$$ So we have proved (A).
(B) Since there must exist at least one singular point on the boundary of the disk of convergence, it suffices to prove that there exists a singular point on $ zinmathbb C: $. Then I am stuck...... Any hint?
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fix $ delta>0 $ and let
$$ Omega=<1 cupz-1 .$$
Assume that $ f(z) $ is a holomorphic function on $ Omega $ whihc has a Taylor series expansion $ sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ at $ z=0 $ such that $ a_n $ is a non-negative real number for all $ nge 0 $.
(A) Prove that the derivatives $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and, moreover, $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_m $$ for all $ 0le kle m $.
(B) Prove that $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $ has radius of convergence strictly greater than $ 1 $.
My attempt:
(A) Since $ f(z)=sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ when $ |z|<1 $, we have
beginalign
f(z)&=sum_nge 0a_n[(z-1)+1]^n\
&=sum_nge 0a_nsum_m=0^nbinomnm(z-1)^m\
&=sum_kge 0left[sum_nge ka_nbinomnkright](z-1)^k\
&=sum_kge 0fracf^(k)(1)k!(z-1)^k
endalign
for $$ zinzcap z: .$$
beginalign
&implies fracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nbinomnk\
&impliesfracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nfracn!k!(n-k)!\
&implies f^(k)(1)=sum_nge ka_nfracn!(n-k)!
endalign
Hence $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and since $ a_nge 0 $, we have
$$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_mquadtextfor all 0le kle m .$$ So we have proved (A).
(B) Since there must exist at least one singular point on the boundary of the disk of convergence, it suffices to prove that there exists a singular point on $ zinmathbb C: $. Then I am stuck...... Any hint?
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fix $ delta>0 $ and let
$$ Omega=<1 cupz-1 .$$
Assume that $ f(z) $ is a holomorphic function on $ Omega $ whihc has a Taylor series expansion $ sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ at $ z=0 $ such that $ a_n $ is a non-negative real number for all $ nge 0 $.
(A) Prove that the derivatives $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and, moreover, $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_m $$ for all $ 0le kle m $.
(B) Prove that $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $ has radius of convergence strictly greater than $ 1 $.
My attempt:
(A) Since $ f(z)=sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ when $ |z|<1 $, we have
beginalign
f(z)&=sum_nge 0a_n[(z-1)+1]^n\
&=sum_nge 0a_nsum_m=0^nbinomnm(z-1)^m\
&=sum_kge 0left[sum_nge ka_nbinomnkright](z-1)^k\
&=sum_kge 0fracf^(k)(1)k!(z-1)^k
endalign
for $$ zinzcap z: .$$
beginalign
&implies fracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nbinomnk\
&impliesfracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nfracn!k!(n-k)!\
&implies f^(k)(1)=sum_nge ka_nfracn!(n-k)!
endalign
Hence $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and since $ a_nge 0 $, we have
$$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_mquadtextfor all 0le kle m .$$ So we have proved (A).
(B) Since there must exist at least one singular point on the boundary of the disk of convergence, it suffices to prove that there exists a singular point on $ zinmathbb C: $. Then I am stuck...... Any hint?
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
Fix $ delta>0 $ and let
$$ Omega=<1 cupz-1 .$$
Assume that $ f(z) $ is a holomorphic function on $ Omega $ whihc has a Taylor series expansion $ sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ at $ z=0 $ such that $ a_n $ is a non-negative real number for all $ nge 0 $.
(A) Prove that the derivatives $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and, moreover, $$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_m $$ for all $ 0le kle m $.
(B) Prove that $ sum_nge 0a_n z^n $ has radius of convergence strictly greater than $ 1 $.
My attempt:
(A) Since $ f(z)=sum_nge 0a_nz^n $ when $ |z|<1 $, we have
beginalign
f(z)&=sum_nge 0a_n[(z-1)+1]^n\
&=sum_nge 0a_nsum_m=0^nbinomnm(z-1)^m\
&=sum_kge 0left[sum_nge ka_nbinomnkright](z-1)^k\
&=sum_kge 0fracf^(k)(1)k!(z-1)^k
endalign
for $$ zinzcap z: .$$
beginalign
&implies fracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nbinomnk\
&impliesfracf^(k)(1)k!=sum_nge ka_nfracn!k!(n-k)!\
&implies f^(k)(1)=sum_nge ka_nfracn!(n-k)!
endalign
Hence $ f^(k)(1) $ are real for all $ kge 0 $ and since $ a_nge 0 $, we have
$$ f^(k)(1)gefracm!(m-k)!a_mquadtextfor all 0le kle m .$$ So we have proved (A).
(B) Since there must exist at least one singular point on the boundary of the disk of convergence, it suffices to prove that there exists a singular point on $ zinmathbb C: $. Then I am stuck...... Any hint?
complex-analysis
complex-analysis
edited Apr 8 at 16:00
user549397
asked Apr 2 at 8:24
user549397user549397
1,7141618
1,7141618
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that if $|z| < 1+delta$, beginalignsuma_nz^n &le suma_n(1+delta)^n\
&=sum_n ge 0left(a_nsum_k=0^nbinomnkdelta^kright)\
&=sum_kge 0left(delta^ksum_nge ka_nbinomnkright)\
&=sum_k=0^inftyfracf^(k)(1)k!,delta^k < infty,endalign hence $f(z)$ has a Taylor series defined in the (open) disc with radius $1+delta$
The switching of the double sum is allowed by the non-negativity of all terms as $a_mnge 0$ implies $$sum_m(sum_na_mn)=sum_n(sum_ma_mn)=sup_n in I, m in Jsuma_mn$$ with supremum taken on all finite sets $I,J$ of natural numbers, the double sums being finite and equal or both infinite
Note that this result is also known as the power series version of Landau's Theorem (Landau's Theorem being much better known for Dirichlet series where it is slightly more difficult to prove than here), stating that if a power series with radius of convergence precisely $r>0$ has non-negative coefficients (for all $n$ high enough), than it must have a singularity at $z=r$. In particular here $r=1$ cannot be the radius convergence of $f$ as $1$ is not a singular point by hypothesis.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe useful idea, too long for a comment: as $f$ is holomorphic in $zinBbb C:$ the Taylor series of $f$ centered at $1$
$$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!(z - 1)^n$$
is convergent at $z = 1 + delta$, i.e.,
$$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!,delta^n$$
is convergent. The convergence of this series plus (A) maybe give a useful bound for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171615%2fabout-the-radius-of-convergence-of-sum-n-ge-0a-n-zn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that if $|z| < 1+delta$, beginalignsuma_nz^n &le suma_n(1+delta)^n\
&=sum_n ge 0left(a_nsum_k=0^nbinomnkdelta^kright)\
&=sum_kge 0left(delta^ksum_nge ka_nbinomnkright)\
&=sum_k=0^inftyfracf^(k)(1)k!,delta^k < infty,endalign hence $f(z)$ has a Taylor series defined in the (open) disc with radius $1+delta$
The switching of the double sum is allowed by the non-negativity of all terms as $a_mnge 0$ implies $$sum_m(sum_na_mn)=sum_n(sum_ma_mn)=sup_n in I, m in Jsuma_mn$$ with supremum taken on all finite sets $I,J$ of natural numbers, the double sums being finite and equal or both infinite
Note that this result is also known as the power series version of Landau's Theorem (Landau's Theorem being much better known for Dirichlet series where it is slightly more difficult to prove than here), stating that if a power series with radius of convergence precisely $r>0$ has non-negative coefficients (for all $n$ high enough), than it must have a singularity at $z=r$. In particular here $r=1$ cannot be the radius convergence of $f$ as $1$ is not a singular point by hypothesis.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that if $|z| < 1+delta$, beginalignsuma_nz^n &le suma_n(1+delta)^n\
&=sum_n ge 0left(a_nsum_k=0^nbinomnkdelta^kright)\
&=sum_kge 0left(delta^ksum_nge ka_nbinomnkright)\
&=sum_k=0^inftyfracf^(k)(1)k!,delta^k < infty,endalign hence $f(z)$ has a Taylor series defined in the (open) disc with radius $1+delta$
The switching of the double sum is allowed by the non-negativity of all terms as $a_mnge 0$ implies $$sum_m(sum_na_mn)=sum_n(sum_ma_mn)=sup_n in I, m in Jsuma_mn$$ with supremum taken on all finite sets $I,J$ of natural numbers, the double sums being finite and equal or both infinite
Note that this result is also known as the power series version of Landau's Theorem (Landau's Theorem being much better known for Dirichlet series where it is slightly more difficult to prove than here), stating that if a power series with radius of convergence precisely $r>0$ has non-negative coefficients (for all $n$ high enough), than it must have a singularity at $z=r$. In particular here $r=1$ cannot be the radius convergence of $f$ as $1$ is not a singular point by hypothesis.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that if $|z| < 1+delta$, beginalignsuma_nz^n &le suma_n(1+delta)^n\
&=sum_n ge 0left(a_nsum_k=0^nbinomnkdelta^kright)\
&=sum_kge 0left(delta^ksum_nge ka_nbinomnkright)\
&=sum_k=0^inftyfracf^(k)(1)k!,delta^k < infty,endalign hence $f(z)$ has a Taylor series defined in the (open) disc with radius $1+delta$
The switching of the double sum is allowed by the non-negativity of all terms as $a_mnge 0$ implies $$sum_m(sum_na_mn)=sum_n(sum_ma_mn)=sup_n in I, m in Jsuma_mn$$ with supremum taken on all finite sets $I,J$ of natural numbers, the double sums being finite and equal or both infinite
Note that this result is also known as the power series version of Landau's Theorem (Landau's Theorem being much better known for Dirichlet series where it is slightly more difficult to prove than here), stating that if a power series with radius of convergence precisely $r>0$ has non-negative coefficients (for all $n$ high enough), than it must have a singularity at $z=r$. In particular here $r=1$ cannot be the radius convergence of $f$ as $1$ is not a singular point by hypothesis.
$endgroup$
Note that if $|z| < 1+delta$, beginalignsuma_nz^n &le suma_n(1+delta)^n\
&=sum_n ge 0left(a_nsum_k=0^nbinomnkdelta^kright)\
&=sum_kge 0left(delta^ksum_nge ka_nbinomnkright)\
&=sum_k=0^inftyfracf^(k)(1)k!,delta^k < infty,endalign hence $f(z)$ has a Taylor series defined in the (open) disc with radius $1+delta$
The switching of the double sum is allowed by the non-negativity of all terms as $a_mnge 0$ implies $$sum_m(sum_na_mn)=sum_n(sum_ma_mn)=sup_n in I, m in Jsuma_mn$$ with supremum taken on all finite sets $I,J$ of natural numbers, the double sums being finite and equal or both infinite
Note that this result is also known as the power series version of Landau's Theorem (Landau's Theorem being much better known for Dirichlet series where it is slightly more difficult to prove than here), stating that if a power series with radius of convergence precisely $r>0$ has non-negative coefficients (for all $n$ high enough), than it must have a singularity at $z=r$. In particular here $r=1$ cannot be the radius convergence of $f$ as $1$ is not a singular point by hypothesis.
edited Apr 9 at 1:41
user549397
1,7141618
1,7141618
answered Apr 8 at 23:46
ConradConrad
1,66246
1,66246
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe useful idea, too long for a comment: as $f$ is holomorphic in $zinBbb C:$ the Taylor series of $f$ centered at $1$
$$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!(z - 1)^n$$
is convergent at $z = 1 + delta$, i.e.,
$$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!,delta^n$$
is convergent. The convergence of this series plus (A) maybe give a useful bound for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe useful idea, too long for a comment: as $f$ is holomorphic in $zinBbb C:$ the Taylor series of $f$ centered at $1$
$$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!(z - 1)^n$$
is convergent at $z = 1 + delta$, i.e.,
$$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!,delta^n$$
is convergent. The convergence of this series plus (A) maybe give a useful bound for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe useful idea, too long for a comment: as $f$ is holomorphic in $zinBbb C:$ the Taylor series of $f$ centered at $1$
$$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!(z - 1)^n$$
is convergent at $z = 1 + delta$, i.e.,
$$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!,delta^n$$
is convergent. The convergence of this series plus (A) maybe give a useful bound for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
Maybe useful idea, too long for a comment: as $f$ is holomorphic in $zinBbb C:$ the Taylor series of $f$ centered at $1$
$$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!(z - 1)^n$$
is convergent at $z = 1 + delta$, i.e.,
$$sum_n=0^inftyfracf^(n)(1)n!,delta^n$$
is convergent. The convergence of this series plus (A) maybe give a useful bound for $a_n$.
answered Apr 5 at 19:56
Martín-Blas Pérez PinillaMartín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
35.6k42972
35.6k42972
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171615%2fabout-the-radius-of-convergence-of-sum-n-ge-0a-n-zn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown