Is my proof correct? (function composition, surjectivity) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to prove if a function is bijective?Function Surjectivity ProofProving a function is surjective given the composition is surjectiveSurjectivity of compositionShow that if $g circ f$ is injective, then so is $f$.Function composition proof - proof that function is injectiveright-cancellative property and surjectivityProof on surjective functionsComposite function proofsIf $g(x) = g(y)$ implies $f(x) = f(y)$ and $g$ is surjective, there's $h$ such that $f(x) = h(g(x))$

What do you call the main part of a joke?

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?

How to write the following sign?

Is there any word for a place full of confusion?

What was the first language to use conditional keywords?

How to tell that you are a giant?

Take 2! Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

What are the diatonic extended chords of C major?

What initially awakened the Balrog?

Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant?

How do you solve the twins Paradox?

Why does the remaining Rebel fleet at the end of Rogue One seem dramatically larger than the one in A New Hope?

Is grep documentation about ignoring case wrong, since it doesn't ignore case in filenames?

Time to Settle Down!

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items

How could we fake a moon landing now?

Find 108 by using 3,4,6

Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

Effects on objects due to a brief relocation of massive amounts of mass

What is this clumpy 20-30cm high yellow-flowered plant?



Is my proof correct? (function composition, surjectivity)



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to prove if a function is bijective?Function Surjectivity ProofProving a function is surjective given the composition is surjectiveSurjectivity of compositionShow that if $g circ f$ is injective, then so is $f$.Function composition proof - proof that function is injectiveright-cancellative property and surjectivityProof on surjective functionsComposite function proofsIf $g(x) = g(y)$ implies $f(x) = f(y)$ and $g$ is surjective, there's $h$ such that $f(x) = h(g(x))$










2












$begingroup$



Exercise. Given sets $E$, $F$, $G$ and functions $g : E to F$ surjective, and $f : E to G$. Prove that there's a function $h : F to G$ such that $f = h circ g$ if and only if the equality $g(x) = g(y)$, with $x, y in E$, implies the equality $f(x) = f(y)$.




My strategy was the following.



Right to left. I assume that $h$ exists. Then if $g(x) = g(y)$, $h(g(x)) = h(g(y))$. Therefore $f(x) = f(y)$ by definition.



Left to right. I assume that the equality $g(x) = g(y)$, with $x,y in E$, implies the equality $f(x) = f(y)$. Given that $g$ is surjective, $g^-1(g(E)) = g^-1(F) = E$. Therefore $f(g^-1circ g(x)) = f(x)$ [note: I know that $f$ and $g$'s values at any given point $xin E$ have the same preimages, but I don't know how to state this more formally.]. I can then define $h: F to G$ such that $h(x) = fcirc g^-1(x)$, and it verifies the stated condition.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are conflating two different meantings of "$g^-1$". In your assertion "Given that $g$ is surjective", your use of $g^-1$ is for the function associated to sets: for each subset $X$ of $F$, $g^-1(X)$ is the collection of all $ein E$ such that $g(e)in X$. However, when you write $g^-1circ g(x))$, you are using it as a functional inverse that takes elements to elements, and such a function need not exist. There is no "$g^-1(x)$", because you do not know that $g$ has an inverse.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Apr 1 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Apr 1 at 19:26










  • $begingroup$
    Please, have a look at my edit, in order to improve your MathJax-fu.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Apr 3 at 16:29















2












$begingroup$



Exercise. Given sets $E$, $F$, $G$ and functions $g : E to F$ surjective, and $f : E to G$. Prove that there's a function $h : F to G$ such that $f = h circ g$ if and only if the equality $g(x) = g(y)$, with $x, y in E$, implies the equality $f(x) = f(y)$.




My strategy was the following.



Right to left. I assume that $h$ exists. Then if $g(x) = g(y)$, $h(g(x)) = h(g(y))$. Therefore $f(x) = f(y)$ by definition.



Left to right. I assume that the equality $g(x) = g(y)$, with $x,y in E$, implies the equality $f(x) = f(y)$. Given that $g$ is surjective, $g^-1(g(E)) = g^-1(F) = E$. Therefore $f(g^-1circ g(x)) = f(x)$ [note: I know that $f$ and $g$'s values at any given point $xin E$ have the same preimages, but I don't know how to state this more formally.]. I can then define $h: F to G$ such that $h(x) = fcirc g^-1(x)$, and it verifies the stated condition.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are conflating two different meantings of "$g^-1$". In your assertion "Given that $g$ is surjective", your use of $g^-1$ is for the function associated to sets: for each subset $X$ of $F$, $g^-1(X)$ is the collection of all $ein E$ such that $g(e)in X$. However, when you write $g^-1circ g(x))$, you are using it as a functional inverse that takes elements to elements, and such a function need not exist. There is no "$g^-1(x)$", because you do not know that $g$ has an inverse.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Apr 1 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Apr 1 at 19:26










  • $begingroup$
    Please, have a look at my edit, in order to improve your MathJax-fu.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Apr 3 at 16:29













2












2








2





$begingroup$



Exercise. Given sets $E$, $F$, $G$ and functions $g : E to F$ surjective, and $f : E to G$. Prove that there's a function $h : F to G$ such that $f = h circ g$ if and only if the equality $g(x) = g(y)$, with $x, y in E$, implies the equality $f(x) = f(y)$.




My strategy was the following.



Right to left. I assume that $h$ exists. Then if $g(x) = g(y)$, $h(g(x)) = h(g(y))$. Therefore $f(x) = f(y)$ by definition.



Left to right. I assume that the equality $g(x) = g(y)$, with $x,y in E$, implies the equality $f(x) = f(y)$. Given that $g$ is surjective, $g^-1(g(E)) = g^-1(F) = E$. Therefore $f(g^-1circ g(x)) = f(x)$ [note: I know that $f$ and $g$'s values at any given point $xin E$ have the same preimages, but I don't know how to state this more formally.]. I can then define $h: F to G$ such that $h(x) = fcirc g^-1(x)$, and it verifies the stated condition.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Exercise. Given sets $E$, $F$, $G$ and functions $g : E to F$ surjective, and $f : E to G$. Prove that there's a function $h : F to G$ such that $f = h circ g$ if and only if the equality $g(x) = g(y)$, with $x, y in E$, implies the equality $f(x) = f(y)$.




My strategy was the following.



Right to left. I assume that $h$ exists. Then if $g(x) = g(y)$, $h(g(x)) = h(g(y))$. Therefore $f(x) = f(y)$ by definition.



Left to right. I assume that the equality $g(x) = g(y)$, with $x,y in E$, implies the equality $f(x) = f(y)$. Given that $g$ is surjective, $g^-1(g(E)) = g^-1(F) = E$. Therefore $f(g^-1circ g(x)) = f(x)$ [note: I know that $f$ and $g$'s values at any given point $xin E$ have the same preimages, but I don't know how to state this more formally.]. I can then define $h: F to G$ such that $h(x) = fcirc g^-1(x)$, and it verifies the stated condition.







abstract-algebra functions discrete-mathematics proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 3 at 16:29









egreg

186k1486209




186k1486209










asked Apr 1 at 19:08









ydnfmewydnfmew

433




433







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are conflating two different meantings of "$g^-1$". In your assertion "Given that $g$ is surjective", your use of $g^-1$ is for the function associated to sets: for each subset $X$ of $F$, $g^-1(X)$ is the collection of all $ein E$ such that $g(e)in X$. However, when you write $g^-1circ g(x))$, you are using it as a functional inverse that takes elements to elements, and such a function need not exist. There is no "$g^-1(x)$", because you do not know that $g$ has an inverse.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Apr 1 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Apr 1 at 19:26










  • $begingroup$
    Please, have a look at my edit, in order to improve your MathJax-fu.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Apr 3 at 16:29












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are conflating two different meantings of "$g^-1$". In your assertion "Given that $g$ is surjective", your use of $g^-1$ is for the function associated to sets: for each subset $X$ of $F$, $g^-1(X)$ is the collection of all $ein E$ such that $g(e)in X$. However, when you write $g^-1circ g(x))$, you are using it as a functional inverse that takes elements to elements, and such a function need not exist. There is no "$g^-1(x)$", because you do not know that $g$ has an inverse.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Apr 1 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Apr 1 at 19:26










  • $begingroup$
    Please, have a look at my edit, in order to improve your MathJax-fu.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Apr 3 at 16:29







1




1




$begingroup$
You are conflating two different meantings of "$g^-1$". In your assertion "Given that $g$ is surjective", your use of $g^-1$ is for the function associated to sets: for each subset $X$ of $F$, $g^-1(X)$ is the collection of all $ein E$ such that $g(e)in X$. However, when you write $g^-1circ g(x))$, you are using it as a functional inverse that takes elements to elements, and such a function need not exist. There is no "$g^-1(x)$", because you do not know that $g$ has an inverse.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Apr 1 at 19:15




$begingroup$
You are conflating two different meantings of "$g^-1$". In your assertion "Given that $g$ is surjective", your use of $g^-1$ is for the function associated to sets: for each subset $X$ of $F$, $g^-1(X)$ is the collection of all $ein E$ such that $g(e)in X$. However, when you write $g^-1circ g(x))$, you are using it as a functional inverse that takes elements to elements, and such a function need not exist. There is no "$g^-1(x)$", because you do not know that $g$ has an inverse.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Apr 1 at 19:15












$begingroup$
Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Apr 1 at 19:26




$begingroup$
Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Apr 1 at 19:26












$begingroup$
Please, have a look at my edit, in order to improve your MathJax-fu.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Apr 3 at 16:29




$begingroup$
Please, have a look at my edit, in order to improve your MathJax-fu.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Apr 3 at 16:29










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

As Arturo has written in the comment $g$ will not necessary have an inverse. Here's a minimal example: $$E=0,1\F=0\G=0$$
In this case, all three functions, $f,g,h$, will be the constant map to $0$ (with different domain/range).
To me, there are two issues in your proof



  1. You seem to have only used the surjective property of $g$ but you haven't really used your assumption: $$g(x)=g(y)Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$$

  2. You even wrote down that you cannot state something more formally (which really is the critical part of the proof)

The idea of your proof is more or less correct, but you will need to define what you are calling $g^-1$ into an actual function. You will need to pick a representative and use the $g(x)=g(y)Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$ assumption to show that $h$ has the properties needed.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171034%2fis-my-proof-correct-function-composition-surjectivity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    As Arturo has written in the comment $g$ will not necessary have an inverse. Here's a minimal example: $$E=0,1\F=0\G=0$$
    In this case, all three functions, $f,g,h$, will be the constant map to $0$ (with different domain/range).
    To me, there are two issues in your proof



    1. You seem to have only used the surjective property of $g$ but you haven't really used your assumption: $$g(x)=g(y)Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$$

    2. You even wrote down that you cannot state something more formally (which really is the critical part of the proof)

    The idea of your proof is more or less correct, but you will need to define what you are calling $g^-1$ into an actual function. You will need to pick a representative and use the $g(x)=g(y)Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$ assumption to show that $h$ has the properties needed.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      As Arturo has written in the comment $g$ will not necessary have an inverse. Here's a minimal example: $$E=0,1\F=0\G=0$$
      In this case, all three functions, $f,g,h$, will be the constant map to $0$ (with different domain/range).
      To me, there are two issues in your proof



      1. You seem to have only used the surjective property of $g$ but you haven't really used your assumption: $$g(x)=g(y)Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$$

      2. You even wrote down that you cannot state something more formally (which really is the critical part of the proof)

      The idea of your proof is more or less correct, but you will need to define what you are calling $g^-1$ into an actual function. You will need to pick a representative and use the $g(x)=g(y)Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$ assumption to show that $h$ has the properties needed.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        As Arturo has written in the comment $g$ will not necessary have an inverse. Here's a minimal example: $$E=0,1\F=0\G=0$$
        In this case, all three functions, $f,g,h$, will be the constant map to $0$ (with different domain/range).
        To me, there are two issues in your proof



        1. You seem to have only used the surjective property of $g$ but you haven't really used your assumption: $$g(x)=g(y)Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$$

        2. You even wrote down that you cannot state something more formally (which really is the critical part of the proof)

        The idea of your proof is more or less correct, but you will need to define what you are calling $g^-1$ into an actual function. You will need to pick a representative and use the $g(x)=g(y)Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$ assumption to show that $h$ has the properties needed.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        As Arturo has written in the comment $g$ will not necessary have an inverse. Here's a minimal example: $$E=0,1\F=0\G=0$$
        In this case, all three functions, $f,g,h$, will be the constant map to $0$ (with different domain/range).
        To me, there are two issues in your proof



        1. You seem to have only used the surjective property of $g$ but you haven't really used your assumption: $$g(x)=g(y)Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$$

        2. You even wrote down that you cannot state something more formally (which really is the critical part of the proof)

        The idea of your proof is more or less correct, but you will need to define what you are calling $g^-1$ into an actual function. You will need to pick a representative and use the $g(x)=g(y)Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$ assumption to show that $h$ has the properties needed.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 3 at 15:49









        DubsDubs

        59426




        59426



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171034%2fis-my-proof-correct-function-composition-surjectivity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

            Србија Садржај Етимологија Географија Историја Политички систем и уставно-правно уређење Становништво Привреда Образовање Култура Спорт Државни празници Галерија Напомене Референце Литература Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију44°48′N 20°28′E / 44.800° СГШ; 20.467° ИГД / 44.800; 20.46744°48′N 20°28′E / 44.800° СГШ; 20.467° ИГД / 44.800; 20.467ууРезултати пописа 2011. према старости и полуу„Положај, рељеф и клима”„Europe: Serbia”„Основни подаци”„Gross domestic product based on purchasing-power-parity (PPP) valuation of country GDP”„Human Development Report 2018 – "Human Development Indices and Indicators 6”„Устав Републике Србије”Правопис српскога језикаGoogle DriveComparative Hungarian Cultural StudiesCalcium and Magnesium in Groundwater: Occurrence and Significance for Human Health„UNSD — Methodology”„Процене становништва | Републички завод за статистику Србије”The Age of Nepotism: Travel Journals and Observations from the Balkans During the Depression„The Serbian Revolution and the Serbian State”„Устав Србије”„Serbia a few steps away from concluding WTO accession negotiations”„A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans”„Freedom in the World 2017”„Serbia: On the Way to EU Accession”„Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update”„2018 Social Progress Index”„Global Peace Index”Sabres of Two Easts: An Untold History of Muslims in Eastern Europe, Their Friends and Foes„Пројекат Растко—Лузица”„Serbia: Introduction”„Serbia”оригинала„The World Factbook: Serbia”„The World Factbook: Kosovo”„Border Police Department”„Uredba o kontroli prelaska administrativne linije prema Autonomnoj pokrajini Kosovo i Metohija”оригиналаIvana Carevic, Velimir Jovanovic, STRATIGRAPHIC-STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MAČVA BASIN, UDC 911.2:551.7(497.11), pp. 1Archived„About the Carpathians – Carpathian Heritage Society”оригинала„O Srbiji”оригинала„Статистички годишњак Србије, 2009: Географски прегледГеографија за осми разред основне школе„Отворена, електронска база едукационих радова”„Влада Републике Србије: Положај, рељеф и клима”„Копрен (Стара планина)”„Туристичка дестинација-Србија”„Висина водопада”„РХМЗ — Републички Хидрометеоролошки завод Србије Кнеза Вишеслава 66 Београд”„Фауна Србије”„Српске шуме на издисају”„Lepih šest odsto Srbije”„Илустрована историја Срба — Увод”„Винчанска култура - Градска општина Гроцка”„''„Винча — Праисторијска метропола”''”оригиналаЈужни Словени под византијском влашћу (600—1025)Држава маћедонских Словена„Карађорђе истина и мит, Проф. др Радош Љушић, Вечерње новости, фељтон, 18 наставака, 24. август - 10. септембар 2003.”„Политика: Како је утврђена војна неутралност, 13. јануар. 2010, приступљено децембра 2012.”„Србија и РС оживеле Дејтонски споразум”„Са српским пасошем у 104 земље”Војска Србије | О Војсци | Војска Србије — Улога, намена и задациАрхивираноВојска Србије | ОрганизацијаАрхивираноОдлука о изради Стратегије просторног развоја Републике Србије до 2020. годинеЗакон о територијалној организацији Републике СрбијеЗакон о државној управиНајчешће постављана питања.„Смањење броја статистичких региона кроз измене Закона о регионалном развоју”„2011 Human development Report”„Službena upotreba jezika i pisama”„Попис становништва, домаћинстава и станова 2011. године у Републици Србији. Књига 4: Вероисповест, матерњи језик и национална припадност”„Вероисповест, матерњи језик и национална”„Специјална известитељка УН за слободу религије и вероисповести Асма Јахангир, код Заштитника грађана Саше Јанковића”„Закон о државним и другим празницима у Републици Србији”„Веронаука у српским школама”„Serbia – Ancestral Genography Atlas”Бела књига Милошевићеве владавинеоригиналаGross domestic product based on purchasing-power-parity (PPP) per capita GDP БДП 2007—2013Актуелни показатељи — Република Србија„Попис становништва, домаћинстава и станова 2011. године у Републици Србији Књига 7: Економска активност”Zemlje kandidati za članstvo u EU„Putin drops South Stream gas pipeline to EU, courts Turkey”„„Соко — историјат””оригинала„„Рембас — историјат””оригинала„„Лубница — историјат””оригинала„„Штаваљ — Историјат””оригинала„„Боговина — историјат””оригинала„„Јасеновац — историјат””оригинала„„Вршка чука — историјат””оригинала„„Ибарски рудници — историјат””оригинала„Закон о просторном плану Републике Србије од 2010 до 2020”„Кривични законик — Недозвољена изградња нуклеарних постројења, члан 267”„Б92: Srbija uklonila obogaćeni uranijum, 25. октобар 2011”„Коришћење енергије ветра у Србији — природни услови и практична примена”„Енергија ветра”„Србија може да прави струју од сунца, биомасе, воде и ветра”„Моја електрана и друге ветрењаче”„Биомаса, струја без инвестиција”„Auto-karte Srbije”„www.srbija.gov.rs Статистике о Србији”оригинала„Статистика зе месец децембар и 2016. годину”„Turizam u Srbiji”„Univerzitet u Beogradu: Vek i po akademskog znanja”„Vojnomedicinska akademija: 165 godina tradicije i napretka”Никола Гиљен, Соња Јовићевић Јов и Јелена Мандић: Мирослављево јеванђеље; Текст је публикован у ревији „Историја” и настао је као део научно-истраживачког рада Фонда „Принцеза Оливера”„World music асоцијација Србије”оригинала„World music у Србији”оригинала„Pogledajte: Boban Marković svira u redakciji „Blica”!”„Eurovision Song Contest 2007 Final”„Projekat Rastko, Alojz Ujes: Joakim Vujic”„Унеско”„Списак локалитета Светске баштине”„Guča i Egzit zaludeli svet”оригинала„Sabor trubača GUČA”„Interesting facts about Exit”оригинала„FIFA Association Information”„Serbia women win EuroBasket title, gain first Olympics berth”„Odbojkašice ispisale istoriju – Srbija je svetski prvak!”„Сајт Ватерполо савеза Србије, Освојене медаље”„Сајт ФК Црвена звезда, Бари”„Сајт ФК Црвена звезда, Токио”„Blic:Zlatna Milica! Mandićeva donela Srbiji najsjajnije odličje u Londonu!”„Милица Мандић освојила златну медаљу („Политика”, 12. август 2012)”„Златни Давор Штефанек”„DŽUDO ŠAMPIONAT Majdov osvojio svetsko zlato”„Španovićeva trećim skokom svih vremena do zlata!”„Чудо Иване Шпановић — 7,24 м („Политика”, 5. март 2017)”The Age of Nepotism: Travel Journals and Observations from the Balkans During the DepressionCalcium and Magnesium in Groundwater: Occurrence and Significance for Human HealthComparative Hungarian Cultural StudiesБела књига Милошевићеве владавинеоригиналаComparative Hungarian Cultural StudiesSabres of Two Easts: An Untold History of Muslims in Eastern Europe, Their Friends and FoesГеографија за осми разред основне школеSerbia: the country, people, life, customsМедијиВодичПодациВлада Републике СрбијеНародна скупштина Републике СрбијеНародна канцеларија председника Републике СрбијеНародна банка СрбијеТуристичка организација СрбијеПортал еУправе Републике СрбијеРепубличко јавно правобранилаштвоууууууWorldCat151202876n851959190000 0000 9526 67094054598-24101000570825ge130919

            Barbados Ynhâld Skiednis | Geografy | Demografy | Navigaasjemenu