Find number of solutions $ x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5+x_6+x_7 = 7 $ where $x_i in left 0,1,2 right$ Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How many solutions are there to the equation $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 + x_6 = 29$?Evaluating the boolean sum $sum_x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_6, x_7 neg(x_1 oplus x_4 oplus x_3 oplus x_6) neg(x_4 oplus x_3 oplus x_2 oplus x_7)$Integer solutions of $x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5+x_6=19$ if every $x_i ge 2$Find the number of integer solutons to $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 + x_6 = 60$.Determine the number of integer solutions for $x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5 < 40$How many natural solutions to $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 + x_6 = 24$ if $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 > x_4 + x_5 + x_6$?Find the number of solutions of the equation $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 + x_6 = N$ subject to constraintsHow many solutions are there to the equation $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 21$,How many distinct values of $x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5+x_6+x_7$ when $x_1,x_2,x_3,..,x_7 in 0,3,4,5$Combinatorics: Number of Integer Solutions for $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 + x_6 < 56$?
How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?
Is a ledger board required if the side of my house is wood?
What is "gratricide"?
How fail-safe is nr as stop bytes?
Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube
Why is the AVR GCC compiler using a full `CALL` even though I have set the `-mshort-calls` flag?
Is it ethical to give a final exam after the professor has quit before teaching the remaining chapters of the course?
Morning, Afternoon, Night Kanji
Did Krishna say in Bhagavad Gita "I am in every living being"
Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?
What is the appropriate index architecture when forced to implement IsDeleted (soft deletes)?
How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?
How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?
Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages?
How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?
How to write this math term? with cases it isn't working
How to tell that you are a giant?
Generate an RGB colour grid
As a beginner, should I get a Squier Strat with a SSS config or a HSS?
Find 108 by using 3,4,6
What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?
What is a fractional matching?
Why is Nikon 1.4g better when Nikon 1.8g is sharper?
Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?
Find number of solutions $ x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5+x_6+x_7 = 7 $ where $x_i in left 0,1,2 right$
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How many solutions are there to the equation $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 + x_6 = 29$?Evaluating the boolean sum $sum_x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_6, x_7 neg(x_1 oplus x_4 oplus x_3 oplus x_6) neg(x_4 oplus x_3 oplus x_2 oplus x_7)$Integer solutions of $x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5+x_6=19$ if every $x_i ge 2$Find the number of integer solutons to $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 + x_6 = 60$.Determine the number of integer solutions for $x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5 < 40$How many natural solutions to $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 + x_6 = 24$ if $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 > x_4 + x_5 + x_6$?Find the number of solutions of the equation $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 + x_6 = N$ subject to constraintsHow many solutions are there to the equation $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 21$,How many distinct values of $x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5+x_6+x_7$ when $x_1,x_2,x_3,..,x_7 in 0,3,4,5$Combinatorics: Number of Integer Solutions for $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 + x_6 < 56$?
$begingroup$
Find number of solutions
$$ x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5+x_6+x_7 = 7 text such that forall_i x_i in left0,1,2right$$
I know how I can do this when I don't have restriction $forall_i x_i in left0,1,2right$:
$$ ooooooooooooo text n+(k-1) = 7 + (7-1) = 13 balls $$
$$ oo||o|oo|o|o| text k-1 = 6 balls I replace with sticks $$
and I have $$ 2 + 0 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 7 $$
I can do this in $$ binomn+k-1k = binom137 $$ ways. But how to deal with additional restriction?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find number of solutions
$$ x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5+x_6+x_7 = 7 text such that forall_i x_i in left0,1,2right$$
I know how I can do this when I don't have restriction $forall_i x_i in left0,1,2right$:
$$ ooooooooooooo text n+(k-1) = 7 + (7-1) = 13 balls $$
$$ oo||o|oo|o|o| text k-1 = 6 balls I replace with sticks $$
and I have $$ 2 + 0 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 7 $$
I can do this in $$ binomn+k-1k = binom137 $$ ways. But how to deal with additional restriction?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find number of solutions
$$ x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5+x_6+x_7 = 7 text such that forall_i x_i in left0,1,2right$$
I know how I can do this when I don't have restriction $forall_i x_i in left0,1,2right$:
$$ ooooooooooooo text n+(k-1) = 7 + (7-1) = 13 balls $$
$$ oo||o|oo|o|o| text k-1 = 6 balls I replace with sticks $$
and I have $$ 2 + 0 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 7 $$
I can do this in $$ binomn+k-1k = binom137 $$ ways. But how to deal with additional restriction?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics
$endgroup$
Find number of solutions
$$ x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5+x_6+x_7 = 7 text such that forall_i x_i in left0,1,2right$$
I know how I can do this when I don't have restriction $forall_i x_i in left0,1,2right$:
$$ ooooooooooooo text n+(k-1) = 7 + (7-1) = 13 balls $$
$$ oo||o|oo|o|o| text k-1 = 6 balls I replace with sticks $$
and I have $$ 2 + 0 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 7 $$
I can do this in $$ binomn+k-1k = binom137 $$ ways. But how to deal with additional restriction?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics
combinatorics discrete-mathematics
asked Apr 1 at 18:27
VirtualUserVirtualUser
1,319317
1,319317
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The number of unique combinations of numbers summed to achieve $7$ in such a way are
$$1,1,1,1,1,1,1$$
$$2,1,1,1,1,1$$
$$2,2,1,1,1$$
$$2,2,2,1$$
So the total number of solutions is given by
$$frac7!7!+frac7!5!+frac7!3!cdot2!cdot2!+frac7!3!cdot3!=393$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: The answer is the coefficient of $x^7$ in $(1 + x + x^2)^7$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know, I get this from generating function.
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
So can you compute it?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
Do you mean manual? Chmm, there is a lot of calculus. But what if there will be not $7$ but $77$? Unless you think about some smarter way?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:34
$begingroup$
I was thinking about pattern $(1+x)^n$ but it also doesn't simplify that
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:39
$begingroup$
The result for any particular exponent does not have a nice closed form expression. To use your example, for $77$, the answer is $27cdot 19 cdot 233 cdot 675602617$ times a $22$-digit prime.
$endgroup$
– Mark Fischler
Apr 1 at 18:44
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Hint: You want the coefficient of $x^7$ in
$$
(1+x+x^2)^7=left(frac1-x^31-xright)^7=(1-x^3)^7times (1-x)^-7
$$
Now, $(1-x^3)^7$ and $ (1-x)^-1$ are the generating functions of two nice series, $a_n$ and $b_n$; can you find them? Once you do, since you want the convolution of these two series:
$$
sum_k=0^7 a_kb_n-k.
$$
Furthermore, you will find that $a_k$ equals zero unless $k$ is a multiple of $3$, so that the above summation is has only three nonzero terms and is therefore easily computable by hand.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$b_n = 1 $ because we have $1+x+x^2+x^3...$ and but $a_n$ seems to be finite
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 20:55
$begingroup$
Yes, $a_n$ is finite. $a_3k=binom7k(-1)^k$, and $a_3k+1=a_3k+2=0$. But you expanded $(1-x)^-7=frac1(1-x)^7$ incorrectly. Use Newton's binomial theorem. @VirtualUser
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 1 at 22:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The "closed form answer" for the number of ways to assign $x_1, x_2, cdots ,x_k$ such that $forall n : x_n in 0,1,2$ and $sum_n=1^k x_n = k$ is, for odd $k$
$$
F^-frack2, -frack-12_1(4)
$$
and for even $k$
$$
F^-frack-12, -frack2 _1(4)
$$
These $F^a,b_c$ are hypergeometric functions.
This is obtained by letting $n$ be the number of $2$s used and doing
$$
sum_n=0^leftlfloorfrack2rightrfloor binomknbinomk-nk-2n
$$
and using the techniques put forth in Concrete Mathematics.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From the theory of Generating Functions it's clear the answer boils down to finding the coefficient of $x^7$ in $(1 + x + x^2)^7$,
Write out the equivalent of Pascal's Triangle for the Trinomial Coefficients, or look it up, or write a quick program to generate them (each term is the sum of the three terms, above left, directly above, above right)
$$1$$
$$1 : 1 : 1$$
$$1: 2: 3: 2: 1$$
$$1: 3: 6: 7: 6: 3: 1$$
$$1: 4: 10: 16: 19: 16: 10: 4: 1$$
$$1: 5: 15: 30: 45: 51: 45: 30: 15: 5: 1$$
$$1: 6: 21: 50: 90: 126: 141: 126: 90: 50: 21: 6: 1$$
$$1: 7: 28: 77: 161: 266: 357: 393: 357: 266: 161: 77: 28: 7: 1 $$
The number sought is the central coefficient in Row 7, the 393.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170964%2ffind-number-of-solutions-x-1x-2x-3x-4x-5x-6x-7-7-where-x-i-in-lef%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The number of unique combinations of numbers summed to achieve $7$ in such a way are
$$1,1,1,1,1,1,1$$
$$2,1,1,1,1,1$$
$$2,2,1,1,1$$
$$2,2,2,1$$
So the total number of solutions is given by
$$frac7!7!+frac7!5!+frac7!3!cdot2!cdot2!+frac7!3!cdot3!=393$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The number of unique combinations of numbers summed to achieve $7$ in such a way are
$$1,1,1,1,1,1,1$$
$$2,1,1,1,1,1$$
$$2,2,1,1,1$$
$$2,2,2,1$$
So the total number of solutions is given by
$$frac7!7!+frac7!5!+frac7!3!cdot2!cdot2!+frac7!3!cdot3!=393$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The number of unique combinations of numbers summed to achieve $7$ in such a way are
$$1,1,1,1,1,1,1$$
$$2,1,1,1,1,1$$
$$2,2,1,1,1$$
$$2,2,2,1$$
So the total number of solutions is given by
$$frac7!7!+frac7!5!+frac7!3!cdot2!cdot2!+frac7!3!cdot3!=393$$
$endgroup$
The number of unique combinations of numbers summed to achieve $7$ in such a way are
$$1,1,1,1,1,1,1$$
$$2,1,1,1,1,1$$
$$2,2,1,1,1$$
$$2,2,2,1$$
So the total number of solutions is given by
$$frac7!7!+frac7!5!+frac7!3!cdot2!cdot2!+frac7!3!cdot3!=393$$
answered Apr 1 at 18:36
Peter ForemanPeter Foreman
8,1421321
8,1421321
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: The answer is the coefficient of $x^7$ in $(1 + x + x^2)^7$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know, I get this from generating function.
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
So can you compute it?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
Do you mean manual? Chmm, there is a lot of calculus. But what if there will be not $7$ but $77$? Unless you think about some smarter way?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:34
$begingroup$
I was thinking about pattern $(1+x)^n$ but it also doesn't simplify that
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:39
$begingroup$
The result for any particular exponent does not have a nice closed form expression. To use your example, for $77$, the answer is $27cdot 19 cdot 233 cdot 675602617$ times a $22$-digit prime.
$endgroup$
– Mark Fischler
Apr 1 at 18:44
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Hint: The answer is the coefficient of $x^7$ in $(1 + x + x^2)^7$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know, I get this from generating function.
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
So can you compute it?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
Do you mean manual? Chmm, there is a lot of calculus. But what if there will be not $7$ but $77$? Unless you think about some smarter way?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:34
$begingroup$
I was thinking about pattern $(1+x)^n$ but it also doesn't simplify that
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:39
$begingroup$
The result for any particular exponent does not have a nice closed form expression. To use your example, for $77$, the answer is $27cdot 19 cdot 233 cdot 675602617$ times a $22$-digit prime.
$endgroup$
– Mark Fischler
Apr 1 at 18:44
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Hint: The answer is the coefficient of $x^7$ in $(1 + x + x^2)^7$.
$endgroup$
Hint: The answer is the coefficient of $x^7$ in $(1 + x + x^2)^7$.
answered Apr 1 at 18:30
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
332k23222481
332k23222481
$begingroup$
I know, I get this from generating function.
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
So can you compute it?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
Do you mean manual? Chmm, there is a lot of calculus. But what if there will be not $7$ but $77$? Unless you think about some smarter way?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:34
$begingroup$
I was thinking about pattern $(1+x)^n$ but it also doesn't simplify that
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:39
$begingroup$
The result for any particular exponent does not have a nice closed form expression. To use your example, for $77$, the answer is $27cdot 19 cdot 233 cdot 675602617$ times a $22$-digit prime.
$endgroup$
– Mark Fischler
Apr 1 at 18:44
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I know, I get this from generating function.
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
So can you compute it?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
Do you mean manual? Chmm, there is a lot of calculus. But what if there will be not $7$ but $77$? Unless you think about some smarter way?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:34
$begingroup$
I was thinking about pattern $(1+x)^n$ but it also doesn't simplify that
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:39
$begingroup$
The result for any particular exponent does not have a nice closed form expression. To use your example, for $77$, the answer is $27cdot 19 cdot 233 cdot 675602617$ times a $22$-digit prime.
$endgroup$
– Mark Fischler
Apr 1 at 18:44
$begingroup$
I know, I get this from generating function.
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
I know, I get this from generating function.
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
So can you compute it?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
So can you compute it?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Apr 1 at 18:32
$begingroup$
Do you mean manual? Chmm, there is a lot of calculus. But what if there will be not $7$ but $77$? Unless you think about some smarter way?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:34
$begingroup$
Do you mean manual? Chmm, there is a lot of calculus. But what if there will be not $7$ but $77$? Unless you think about some smarter way?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:34
$begingroup$
I was thinking about pattern $(1+x)^n$ but it also doesn't simplify that
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:39
$begingroup$
I was thinking about pattern $(1+x)^n$ but it also doesn't simplify that
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 18:39
$begingroup$
The result for any particular exponent does not have a nice closed form expression. To use your example, for $77$, the answer is $27cdot 19 cdot 233 cdot 675602617$ times a $22$-digit prime.
$endgroup$
– Mark Fischler
Apr 1 at 18:44
$begingroup$
The result for any particular exponent does not have a nice closed form expression. To use your example, for $77$, the answer is $27cdot 19 cdot 233 cdot 675602617$ times a $22$-digit prime.
$endgroup$
– Mark Fischler
Apr 1 at 18:44
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Hint: You want the coefficient of $x^7$ in
$$
(1+x+x^2)^7=left(frac1-x^31-xright)^7=(1-x^3)^7times (1-x)^-7
$$
Now, $(1-x^3)^7$ and $ (1-x)^-1$ are the generating functions of two nice series, $a_n$ and $b_n$; can you find them? Once you do, since you want the convolution of these two series:
$$
sum_k=0^7 a_kb_n-k.
$$
Furthermore, you will find that $a_k$ equals zero unless $k$ is a multiple of $3$, so that the above summation is has only three nonzero terms and is therefore easily computable by hand.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$b_n = 1 $ because we have $1+x+x^2+x^3...$ and but $a_n$ seems to be finite
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 20:55
$begingroup$
Yes, $a_n$ is finite. $a_3k=binom7k(-1)^k$, and $a_3k+1=a_3k+2=0$. But you expanded $(1-x)^-7=frac1(1-x)^7$ incorrectly. Use Newton's binomial theorem. @VirtualUser
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 1 at 22:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: You want the coefficient of $x^7$ in
$$
(1+x+x^2)^7=left(frac1-x^31-xright)^7=(1-x^3)^7times (1-x)^-7
$$
Now, $(1-x^3)^7$ and $ (1-x)^-1$ are the generating functions of two nice series, $a_n$ and $b_n$; can you find them? Once you do, since you want the convolution of these two series:
$$
sum_k=0^7 a_kb_n-k.
$$
Furthermore, you will find that $a_k$ equals zero unless $k$ is a multiple of $3$, so that the above summation is has only three nonzero terms and is therefore easily computable by hand.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$b_n = 1 $ because we have $1+x+x^2+x^3...$ and but $a_n$ seems to be finite
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 20:55
$begingroup$
Yes, $a_n$ is finite. $a_3k=binom7k(-1)^k$, and $a_3k+1=a_3k+2=0$. But you expanded $(1-x)^-7=frac1(1-x)^7$ incorrectly. Use Newton's binomial theorem. @VirtualUser
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 1 at 22:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: You want the coefficient of $x^7$ in
$$
(1+x+x^2)^7=left(frac1-x^31-xright)^7=(1-x^3)^7times (1-x)^-7
$$
Now, $(1-x^3)^7$ and $ (1-x)^-1$ are the generating functions of two nice series, $a_n$ and $b_n$; can you find them? Once you do, since you want the convolution of these two series:
$$
sum_k=0^7 a_kb_n-k.
$$
Furthermore, you will find that $a_k$ equals zero unless $k$ is a multiple of $3$, so that the above summation is has only three nonzero terms and is therefore easily computable by hand.
$endgroup$
Hint: You want the coefficient of $x^7$ in
$$
(1+x+x^2)^7=left(frac1-x^31-xright)^7=(1-x^3)^7times (1-x)^-7
$$
Now, $(1-x^3)^7$ and $ (1-x)^-1$ are the generating functions of two nice series, $a_n$ and $b_n$; can you find them? Once you do, since you want the convolution of these two series:
$$
sum_k=0^7 a_kb_n-k.
$$
Furthermore, you will find that $a_k$ equals zero unless $k$ is a multiple of $3$, so that the above summation is has only three nonzero terms and is therefore easily computable by hand.
answered Apr 1 at 18:53
Mike EarnestMike Earnest
28.2k22152
28.2k22152
$begingroup$
$b_n = 1 $ because we have $1+x+x^2+x^3...$ and but $a_n$ seems to be finite
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 20:55
$begingroup$
Yes, $a_n$ is finite. $a_3k=binom7k(-1)^k$, and $a_3k+1=a_3k+2=0$. But you expanded $(1-x)^-7=frac1(1-x)^7$ incorrectly. Use Newton's binomial theorem. @VirtualUser
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 1 at 22:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$b_n = 1 $ because we have $1+x+x^2+x^3...$ and but $a_n$ seems to be finite
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 20:55
$begingroup$
Yes, $a_n$ is finite. $a_3k=binom7k(-1)^k$, and $a_3k+1=a_3k+2=0$. But you expanded $(1-x)^-7=frac1(1-x)^7$ incorrectly. Use Newton's binomial theorem. @VirtualUser
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 1 at 22:56
$begingroup$
$b_n = 1 $ because we have $1+x+x^2+x^3...$ and but $a_n$ seems to be finite
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 20:55
$begingroup$
$b_n = 1 $ because we have $1+x+x^2+x^3...$ and but $a_n$ seems to be finite
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Apr 1 at 20:55
$begingroup$
Yes, $a_n$ is finite. $a_3k=binom7k(-1)^k$, and $a_3k+1=a_3k+2=0$. But you expanded $(1-x)^-7=frac1(1-x)^7$ incorrectly. Use Newton's binomial theorem. @VirtualUser
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 1 at 22:56
$begingroup$
Yes, $a_n$ is finite. $a_3k=binom7k(-1)^k$, and $a_3k+1=a_3k+2=0$. But you expanded $(1-x)^-7=frac1(1-x)^7$ incorrectly. Use Newton's binomial theorem. @VirtualUser
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 1 at 22:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The "closed form answer" for the number of ways to assign $x_1, x_2, cdots ,x_k$ such that $forall n : x_n in 0,1,2$ and $sum_n=1^k x_n = k$ is, for odd $k$
$$
F^-frack2, -frack-12_1(4)
$$
and for even $k$
$$
F^-frack-12, -frack2 _1(4)
$$
These $F^a,b_c$ are hypergeometric functions.
This is obtained by letting $n$ be the number of $2$s used and doing
$$
sum_n=0^leftlfloorfrack2rightrfloor binomknbinomk-nk-2n
$$
and using the techniques put forth in Concrete Mathematics.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The "closed form answer" for the number of ways to assign $x_1, x_2, cdots ,x_k$ such that $forall n : x_n in 0,1,2$ and $sum_n=1^k x_n = k$ is, for odd $k$
$$
F^-frack2, -frack-12_1(4)
$$
and for even $k$
$$
F^-frack-12, -frack2 _1(4)
$$
These $F^a,b_c$ are hypergeometric functions.
This is obtained by letting $n$ be the number of $2$s used and doing
$$
sum_n=0^leftlfloorfrack2rightrfloor binomknbinomk-nk-2n
$$
and using the techniques put forth in Concrete Mathematics.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The "closed form answer" for the number of ways to assign $x_1, x_2, cdots ,x_k$ such that $forall n : x_n in 0,1,2$ and $sum_n=1^k x_n = k$ is, for odd $k$
$$
F^-frack2, -frack-12_1(4)
$$
and for even $k$
$$
F^-frack-12, -frack2 _1(4)
$$
These $F^a,b_c$ are hypergeometric functions.
This is obtained by letting $n$ be the number of $2$s used and doing
$$
sum_n=0^leftlfloorfrack2rightrfloor binomknbinomk-nk-2n
$$
and using the techniques put forth in Concrete Mathematics.
$endgroup$
The "closed form answer" for the number of ways to assign $x_1, x_2, cdots ,x_k$ such that $forall n : x_n in 0,1,2$ and $sum_n=1^k x_n = k$ is, for odd $k$
$$
F^-frack2, -frack-12_1(4)
$$
and for even $k$
$$
F^-frack-12, -frack2 _1(4)
$$
These $F^a,b_c$ are hypergeometric functions.
This is obtained by letting $n$ be the number of $2$s used and doing
$$
sum_n=0^leftlfloorfrack2rightrfloor binomknbinomk-nk-2n
$$
and using the techniques put forth in Concrete Mathematics.
answered Apr 1 at 19:07
Mark FischlerMark Fischler
34.5k12552
34.5k12552
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From the theory of Generating Functions it's clear the answer boils down to finding the coefficient of $x^7$ in $(1 + x + x^2)^7$,
Write out the equivalent of Pascal's Triangle for the Trinomial Coefficients, or look it up, or write a quick program to generate them (each term is the sum of the three terms, above left, directly above, above right)
$$1$$
$$1 : 1 : 1$$
$$1: 2: 3: 2: 1$$
$$1: 3: 6: 7: 6: 3: 1$$
$$1: 4: 10: 16: 19: 16: 10: 4: 1$$
$$1: 5: 15: 30: 45: 51: 45: 30: 15: 5: 1$$
$$1: 6: 21: 50: 90: 126: 141: 126: 90: 50: 21: 6: 1$$
$$1: 7: 28: 77: 161: 266: 357: 393: 357: 266: 161: 77: 28: 7: 1 $$
The number sought is the central coefficient in Row 7, the 393.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From the theory of Generating Functions it's clear the answer boils down to finding the coefficient of $x^7$ in $(1 + x + x^2)^7$,
Write out the equivalent of Pascal's Triangle for the Trinomial Coefficients, or look it up, or write a quick program to generate them (each term is the sum of the three terms, above left, directly above, above right)
$$1$$
$$1 : 1 : 1$$
$$1: 2: 3: 2: 1$$
$$1: 3: 6: 7: 6: 3: 1$$
$$1: 4: 10: 16: 19: 16: 10: 4: 1$$
$$1: 5: 15: 30: 45: 51: 45: 30: 15: 5: 1$$
$$1: 6: 21: 50: 90: 126: 141: 126: 90: 50: 21: 6: 1$$
$$1: 7: 28: 77: 161: 266: 357: 393: 357: 266: 161: 77: 28: 7: 1 $$
The number sought is the central coefficient in Row 7, the 393.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From the theory of Generating Functions it's clear the answer boils down to finding the coefficient of $x^7$ in $(1 + x + x^2)^7$,
Write out the equivalent of Pascal's Triangle for the Trinomial Coefficients, or look it up, or write a quick program to generate them (each term is the sum of the three terms, above left, directly above, above right)
$$1$$
$$1 : 1 : 1$$
$$1: 2: 3: 2: 1$$
$$1: 3: 6: 7: 6: 3: 1$$
$$1: 4: 10: 16: 19: 16: 10: 4: 1$$
$$1: 5: 15: 30: 45: 51: 45: 30: 15: 5: 1$$
$$1: 6: 21: 50: 90: 126: 141: 126: 90: 50: 21: 6: 1$$
$$1: 7: 28: 77: 161: 266: 357: 393: 357: 266: 161: 77: 28: 7: 1 $$
The number sought is the central coefficient in Row 7, the 393.
$endgroup$
From the theory of Generating Functions it's clear the answer boils down to finding the coefficient of $x^7$ in $(1 + x + x^2)^7$,
Write out the equivalent of Pascal's Triangle for the Trinomial Coefficients, or look it up, or write a quick program to generate them (each term is the sum of the three terms, above left, directly above, above right)
$$1$$
$$1 : 1 : 1$$
$$1: 2: 3: 2: 1$$
$$1: 3: 6: 7: 6: 3: 1$$
$$1: 4: 10: 16: 19: 16: 10: 4: 1$$
$$1: 5: 15: 30: 45: 51: 45: 30: 15: 5: 1$$
$$1: 6: 21: 50: 90: 126: 141: 126: 90: 50: 21: 6: 1$$
$$1: 7: 28: 77: 161: 266: 357: 393: 357: 266: 161: 77: 28: 7: 1 $$
The number sought is the central coefficient in Row 7, the 393.
answered Apr 7 at 22:29
Martin HansenMartin Hansen
975115
975115
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170964%2ffind-number-of-solutions-x-1x-2x-3x-4x-5x-6x-7-7-where-x-i-in-lef%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown