Upper Bound for Polynomial Using Evenly Spaced Points Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Bound for the solution of Non homogeneous equations$N$ equally spaced points on an ellipsoidHow to find upper bound on absolute error with composite trapezoid ruleOptimal way to find derivative - numericallyAn upper bound on a sequence of positive numbers $x_n$ such that $x_n+1 le min b cdot x_n,c$Solving for many points in a curve at the same timeFinding an error bound for Lagrange interpolation with evenly spaced nodesUpper bounding polynomial interpolation errorUpper bound for $sumlimits_i=2^Nx_i(x_i-1+x_i)$Calculating Middle Points when using Simpson's Rule

If 'B is more likely given A', then 'A is more likely given B'

Determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of the matrix.

Letter Boxed validator

What is a Meta algorithm?

List *all* the tuples!

Stars Make Stars

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?

Why is black pepper both grey and black?

Gastric acid as a weapon

The logistics of corpse disposal

When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?

Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?

How to motivate offshore teams and trust them to deliver?

Why is "Consequences inflicted." not a sentence?

Right-skewed distribution with mean equals to mode?

Does surprise arrest existing movement?

If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?

Bonus calculation: Am I making a mountain out of a molehill?

How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?

Models of set theory where not every set can be linearly ordered

When is phishing education going too far?



Upper Bound for Polynomial Using Evenly Spaced Points



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Bound for the solution of Non homogeneous equations$N$ equally spaced points on an ellipsoidHow to find upper bound on absolute error with composite trapezoid ruleOptimal way to find derivative - numericallyAn upper bound on a sequence of positive numbers $x_n$ such that $x_n+1 le min b cdot x_n,c$Solving for many points in a curve at the same timeFinding an error bound for Lagrange interpolation with evenly spaced nodesUpper bounding polynomial interpolation errorUpper bound for $sumlimits_i=2^Nx_i(x_i-1+x_i)$Calculating Middle Points when using Simpson's Rule










2












$begingroup$


Suppose that $x in [0,1]$ and the points $x_1, x_2,ldots x_n$ are evenly spaced in the interval $[0,1]$. I am trying to find a tight bound for the maximum of:



$$(x - x_1)(x-x_2)cdots(x-x_n) $$



I realize that the above expression will be smaller in absolute value than the absolute value of the smallest term $(x-x_i)$ for $ 1le i le n$ since each term will is less than $1$. Thus, if there are $n$ equally spaced points, each distanced $frac1n-1$ apart, then smallest term will be bounded above by $frac12(n-1)$.



I am wondering if there is a way to get a tighter bound than the one I have found above.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @Servaes There are $n$ evenly spaced points in the inverval $[0,1]$, so they are at a distance $frac1n-1$ apart.
    $endgroup$
    – Is12Prime
    Apr 1 at 1:26















2












$begingroup$


Suppose that $x in [0,1]$ and the points $x_1, x_2,ldots x_n$ are evenly spaced in the interval $[0,1]$. I am trying to find a tight bound for the maximum of:



$$(x - x_1)(x-x_2)cdots(x-x_n) $$



I realize that the above expression will be smaller in absolute value than the absolute value of the smallest term $(x-x_i)$ for $ 1le i le n$ since each term will is less than $1$. Thus, if there are $n$ equally spaced points, each distanced $frac1n-1$ apart, then smallest term will be bounded above by $frac12(n-1)$.



I am wondering if there is a way to get a tighter bound than the one I have found above.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @Servaes There are $n$ evenly spaced points in the inverval $[0,1]$, so they are at a distance $frac1n-1$ apart.
    $endgroup$
    – Is12Prime
    Apr 1 at 1:26













2












2








2


0



$begingroup$


Suppose that $x in [0,1]$ and the points $x_1, x_2,ldots x_n$ are evenly spaced in the interval $[0,1]$. I am trying to find a tight bound for the maximum of:



$$(x - x_1)(x-x_2)cdots(x-x_n) $$



I realize that the above expression will be smaller in absolute value than the absolute value of the smallest term $(x-x_i)$ for $ 1le i le n$ since each term will is less than $1$. Thus, if there are $n$ equally spaced points, each distanced $frac1n-1$ apart, then smallest term will be bounded above by $frac12(n-1)$.



I am wondering if there is a way to get a tighter bound than the one I have found above.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose that $x in [0,1]$ and the points $x_1, x_2,ldots x_n$ are evenly spaced in the interval $[0,1]$. I am trying to find a tight bound for the maximum of:



$$(x - x_1)(x-x_2)cdots(x-x_n) $$



I realize that the above expression will be smaller in absolute value than the absolute value of the smallest term $(x-x_i)$ for $ 1le i le n$ since each term will is less than $1$. Thus, if there are $n$ equally spaced points, each distanced $frac1n-1$ apart, then smallest term will be bounded above by $frac12(n-1)$.



I am wondering if there is a way to get a tighter bound than the one I have found above.







real-analysis calculus polynomials numerical-methods maxima-minima






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 1 at 22:47









Servaes

30.6k342101




30.6k342101










asked Apr 1 at 0:45









Is12PrimeIs12Prime

153113




153113











  • $begingroup$
    @Servaes There are $n$ evenly spaced points in the inverval $[0,1]$, so they are at a distance $frac1n-1$ apart.
    $endgroup$
    – Is12Prime
    Apr 1 at 1:26
















  • $begingroup$
    @Servaes There are $n$ evenly spaced points in the inverval $[0,1]$, so they are at a distance $frac1n-1$ apart.
    $endgroup$
    – Is12Prime
    Apr 1 at 1:26















$begingroup$
@Servaes There are $n$ evenly spaced points in the inverval $[0,1]$, so they are at a distance $frac1n-1$ apart.
$endgroup$
– Is12Prime
Apr 1 at 1:26




$begingroup$
@Servaes There are $n$ evenly spaced points in the inverval $[0,1]$, so they are at a distance $frac1n-1$ apart.
$endgroup$
– Is12Prime
Apr 1 at 1:26










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

One finds that the factors, excluding those for the points directly around $x$, are largest in the first and last interval. As the maxima of third degree polynomials are still accessible, for an $xin[x_1,x_2]$ we get the first bound
$$
|(x-x_1)cdots(x-x_n)|le|(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)|cdot |(x_4-x_1)cdots(x_n-x_1)|
$$

Now set $s=x-x_2$ and $x_2-x_1=h=x_3-x_2$, more generally $x_k-x_1=(k-1)h$, so that $sin[-h,0]$. The cubic factor reads as $(s+h)s(s-h)=s^3-sh^2$ which has its extrema at $s=pmfrachsqrt3$ with value $mpfrac2sqrt3h^39$.



The upper bound of this method is thus
$$
|(x-x_1)cdots(x-x_n)|lefrac2sqrt3h^39cdot 3hcdot 4hcdots(n-1)hlefracsqrt39frac(n-1)!(n-1)^nsim fracsqrt6pi9sqrtn-1e^1-n.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This looks like a clean solution. However, could you please explain to me how the second inequality on the last line follows? I'm also not familiar with the ~ notation you used. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Is12Prime
    Apr 1 at 23:49







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The tilde means "asymptotically equal", that is via the Stirling formulas. The second part is wrong, I copied too much, I'll edit so that it also answers your first question.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Apr 2 at 6:35


















1












$begingroup$

Let $ngeq3$ and let $x_i:=fracin-1$ so that we want to determine the maximum of the polynomial
$$f_n(x):=prod_i=1^n(x-x_i)=prod_i=1^nleft(x-frac1-in-1right),$$
on the interval $[0,1]$. If $n$ is odd then for all $xin(x_1,x_2)$ and $i>2$ we have
$$frac1-in-1<x-x_i<frac2-in-1<0,$$
from which it follows that
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)prod_i=3^nfrac2-in-1
<f_n(x)
<(x-x_1)(x-x_2)prod_i=3^nfrac1-in-1.$$

The maximum of $(x-x_1)(x-x_2)$ on the interval $(x_1,x_2)$ is at the midpoint $fracx_1+x_22=frac12(n-1)$, yielding the following bounds for the maximum $M_n$ of $f_n$ on the interval $(x_1,x_2)$:
$$M_n
>left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_1right)left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_2right)prod_i=3^nfrac2-in-1
=frac14frac(n-2)!(n-1)^n.
$$

$$M_n
<left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_1right)left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_2right)prod_i=3^nfrac1-in-1
=frac14frac(n-1)!(n-1)^n,$$

Similarly, if $n$ is even then for all $xin(x_2,x_3)$ and $i>3$ we have
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)prod_i=4^nfrac3-in-1
<f_n(x)
<(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)prod_i=4^nfrac2-in-1,$$

and some basic algebra shows that the maximum of $(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)$ is at $x=frac1+sqrt33(n-1)$, so
$$M_n>left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_1right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_2right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_3right)prod_i=4^nfrac3-in-1
=2fracsqrt39frac(n-3)!(n-1)^n,$$

$$M_n<left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_1right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_2right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_3right)prod_i=4^nfrac2-in-1
=2fracsqrt39frac(n-2)!(n-1)^n.$$




Proof that the maximum is in $(x_1,x_2)$ if $n$ is odd, and in $(x_2,x_3)$ if $n$ is even:



(A bit messy, might clean up later)



It it not hard to see that for $xin(x_k,x_k+1)$
we have $operatornamesgnf(x)=(-1)^n-k$. So the maximum is in some interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$ with $kequiv npmod2$.



The symmetry in the product shows that for all $xin(0,1]$ we have
$$fleft(x-frac1n-1right)
=fracx-x_nx-x_1fleft(xright)
=(1-x^-1)f(x),$$

and of course for $xin[tfrac12,1]$ we have $|1-x^-1|leq1$, so the maximum value of $f$ on the interval $[tfrac12,1]$ is assumed on the interval $(x_n-2,x_n-1)$. It is clear that
$$f(1-x)=(-1)^nf(x),$$
for all $xin[0,1]$, from which it follows that the maximum value of $f$ on the interval $[0,1]$ is assumed on $(x_1,x_2)$ if $n$ is odd, and on $(x_2,x_3)$ if $n$ is even.



The polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ has precisely $n$ distinct roots in the interval $[0,1]$. It follows that the polynomial $f'$ has precisely one root in each interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$ for $kin1,ldots,n-1$. The maximum of $f$ is then assumed at the unique root of $f'$ in the interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$, where $k=1$ if $n$ is odd and $k=2$ if $n$ is even.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Servaes You should fix your answer. According to your definition of $f$, $f(1)=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Apr 1 at 8:41










  • $begingroup$
    @PierreCarre I have attempted to fix my answer; my earlier approach was not very fruitful so it is quite a different answer now.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Apr 1 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    In your first long formula you have $i-i$ where it should be $i-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Apr 2 at 6:39










  • $begingroup$
    @LutzL Thanks for spotting, it should be $1-i$.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Apr 2 at 14:55











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170072%2fupper-bound-for-polynomial-using-evenly-spaced-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

One finds that the factors, excluding those for the points directly around $x$, are largest in the first and last interval. As the maxima of third degree polynomials are still accessible, for an $xin[x_1,x_2]$ we get the first bound
$$
|(x-x_1)cdots(x-x_n)|le|(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)|cdot |(x_4-x_1)cdots(x_n-x_1)|
$$

Now set $s=x-x_2$ and $x_2-x_1=h=x_3-x_2$, more generally $x_k-x_1=(k-1)h$, so that $sin[-h,0]$. The cubic factor reads as $(s+h)s(s-h)=s^3-sh^2$ which has its extrema at $s=pmfrachsqrt3$ with value $mpfrac2sqrt3h^39$.



The upper bound of this method is thus
$$
|(x-x_1)cdots(x-x_n)|lefrac2sqrt3h^39cdot 3hcdot 4hcdots(n-1)hlefracsqrt39frac(n-1)!(n-1)^nsim fracsqrt6pi9sqrtn-1e^1-n.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This looks like a clean solution. However, could you please explain to me how the second inequality on the last line follows? I'm also not familiar with the ~ notation you used. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Is12Prime
    Apr 1 at 23:49







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The tilde means "asymptotically equal", that is via the Stirling formulas. The second part is wrong, I copied too much, I'll edit so that it also answers your first question.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Apr 2 at 6:35















1












$begingroup$

One finds that the factors, excluding those for the points directly around $x$, are largest in the first and last interval. As the maxima of third degree polynomials are still accessible, for an $xin[x_1,x_2]$ we get the first bound
$$
|(x-x_1)cdots(x-x_n)|le|(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)|cdot |(x_4-x_1)cdots(x_n-x_1)|
$$

Now set $s=x-x_2$ and $x_2-x_1=h=x_3-x_2$, more generally $x_k-x_1=(k-1)h$, so that $sin[-h,0]$. The cubic factor reads as $(s+h)s(s-h)=s^3-sh^2$ which has its extrema at $s=pmfrachsqrt3$ with value $mpfrac2sqrt3h^39$.



The upper bound of this method is thus
$$
|(x-x_1)cdots(x-x_n)|lefrac2sqrt3h^39cdot 3hcdot 4hcdots(n-1)hlefracsqrt39frac(n-1)!(n-1)^nsim fracsqrt6pi9sqrtn-1e^1-n.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This looks like a clean solution. However, could you please explain to me how the second inequality on the last line follows? I'm also not familiar with the ~ notation you used. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Is12Prime
    Apr 1 at 23:49







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The tilde means "asymptotically equal", that is via the Stirling formulas. The second part is wrong, I copied too much, I'll edit so that it also answers your first question.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Apr 2 at 6:35













1












1








1





$begingroup$

One finds that the factors, excluding those for the points directly around $x$, are largest in the first and last interval. As the maxima of third degree polynomials are still accessible, for an $xin[x_1,x_2]$ we get the first bound
$$
|(x-x_1)cdots(x-x_n)|le|(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)|cdot |(x_4-x_1)cdots(x_n-x_1)|
$$

Now set $s=x-x_2$ and $x_2-x_1=h=x_3-x_2$, more generally $x_k-x_1=(k-1)h$, so that $sin[-h,0]$. The cubic factor reads as $(s+h)s(s-h)=s^3-sh^2$ which has its extrema at $s=pmfrachsqrt3$ with value $mpfrac2sqrt3h^39$.



The upper bound of this method is thus
$$
|(x-x_1)cdots(x-x_n)|lefrac2sqrt3h^39cdot 3hcdot 4hcdots(n-1)hlefracsqrt39frac(n-1)!(n-1)^nsim fracsqrt6pi9sqrtn-1e^1-n.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



One finds that the factors, excluding those for the points directly around $x$, are largest in the first and last interval. As the maxima of third degree polynomials are still accessible, for an $xin[x_1,x_2]$ we get the first bound
$$
|(x-x_1)cdots(x-x_n)|le|(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)|cdot |(x_4-x_1)cdots(x_n-x_1)|
$$

Now set $s=x-x_2$ and $x_2-x_1=h=x_3-x_2$, more generally $x_k-x_1=(k-1)h$, so that $sin[-h,0]$. The cubic factor reads as $(s+h)s(s-h)=s^3-sh^2$ which has its extrema at $s=pmfrachsqrt3$ with value $mpfrac2sqrt3h^39$.



The upper bound of this method is thus
$$
|(x-x_1)cdots(x-x_n)|lefrac2sqrt3h^39cdot 3hcdot 4hcdots(n-1)hlefracsqrt39frac(n-1)!(n-1)^nsim fracsqrt6pi9sqrtn-1e^1-n.
$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Apr 2 at 6:37

























answered Apr 1 at 10:31









LutzLLutzL

60.6k42057




60.6k42057











  • $begingroup$
    This looks like a clean solution. However, could you please explain to me how the second inequality on the last line follows? I'm also not familiar with the ~ notation you used. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Is12Prime
    Apr 1 at 23:49







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The tilde means "asymptotically equal", that is via the Stirling formulas. The second part is wrong, I copied too much, I'll edit so that it also answers your first question.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Apr 2 at 6:35
















  • $begingroup$
    This looks like a clean solution. However, could you please explain to me how the second inequality on the last line follows? I'm also not familiar with the ~ notation you used. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Is12Prime
    Apr 1 at 23:49







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The tilde means "asymptotically equal", that is via the Stirling formulas. The second part is wrong, I copied too much, I'll edit so that it also answers your first question.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Apr 2 at 6:35















$begingroup$
This looks like a clean solution. However, could you please explain to me how the second inequality on the last line follows? I'm also not familiar with the ~ notation you used. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Is12Prime
Apr 1 at 23:49





$begingroup$
This looks like a clean solution. However, could you please explain to me how the second inequality on the last line follows? I'm also not familiar with the ~ notation you used. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Is12Prime
Apr 1 at 23:49





1




1




$begingroup$
The tilde means "asymptotically equal", that is via the Stirling formulas. The second part is wrong, I copied too much, I'll edit so that it also answers your first question.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Apr 2 at 6:35




$begingroup$
The tilde means "asymptotically equal", that is via the Stirling formulas. The second part is wrong, I copied too much, I'll edit so that it also answers your first question.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Apr 2 at 6:35











1












$begingroup$

Let $ngeq3$ and let $x_i:=fracin-1$ so that we want to determine the maximum of the polynomial
$$f_n(x):=prod_i=1^n(x-x_i)=prod_i=1^nleft(x-frac1-in-1right),$$
on the interval $[0,1]$. If $n$ is odd then for all $xin(x_1,x_2)$ and $i>2$ we have
$$frac1-in-1<x-x_i<frac2-in-1<0,$$
from which it follows that
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)prod_i=3^nfrac2-in-1
<f_n(x)
<(x-x_1)(x-x_2)prod_i=3^nfrac1-in-1.$$

The maximum of $(x-x_1)(x-x_2)$ on the interval $(x_1,x_2)$ is at the midpoint $fracx_1+x_22=frac12(n-1)$, yielding the following bounds for the maximum $M_n$ of $f_n$ on the interval $(x_1,x_2)$:
$$M_n
>left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_1right)left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_2right)prod_i=3^nfrac2-in-1
=frac14frac(n-2)!(n-1)^n.
$$

$$M_n
<left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_1right)left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_2right)prod_i=3^nfrac1-in-1
=frac14frac(n-1)!(n-1)^n,$$

Similarly, if $n$ is even then for all $xin(x_2,x_3)$ and $i>3$ we have
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)prod_i=4^nfrac3-in-1
<f_n(x)
<(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)prod_i=4^nfrac2-in-1,$$

and some basic algebra shows that the maximum of $(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)$ is at $x=frac1+sqrt33(n-1)$, so
$$M_n>left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_1right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_2right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_3right)prod_i=4^nfrac3-in-1
=2fracsqrt39frac(n-3)!(n-1)^n,$$

$$M_n<left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_1right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_2right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_3right)prod_i=4^nfrac2-in-1
=2fracsqrt39frac(n-2)!(n-1)^n.$$




Proof that the maximum is in $(x_1,x_2)$ if $n$ is odd, and in $(x_2,x_3)$ if $n$ is even:



(A bit messy, might clean up later)



It it not hard to see that for $xin(x_k,x_k+1)$
we have $operatornamesgnf(x)=(-1)^n-k$. So the maximum is in some interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$ with $kequiv npmod2$.



The symmetry in the product shows that for all $xin(0,1]$ we have
$$fleft(x-frac1n-1right)
=fracx-x_nx-x_1fleft(xright)
=(1-x^-1)f(x),$$

and of course for $xin[tfrac12,1]$ we have $|1-x^-1|leq1$, so the maximum value of $f$ on the interval $[tfrac12,1]$ is assumed on the interval $(x_n-2,x_n-1)$. It is clear that
$$f(1-x)=(-1)^nf(x),$$
for all $xin[0,1]$, from which it follows that the maximum value of $f$ on the interval $[0,1]$ is assumed on $(x_1,x_2)$ if $n$ is odd, and on $(x_2,x_3)$ if $n$ is even.



The polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ has precisely $n$ distinct roots in the interval $[0,1]$. It follows that the polynomial $f'$ has precisely one root in each interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$ for $kin1,ldots,n-1$. The maximum of $f$ is then assumed at the unique root of $f'$ in the interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$, where $k=1$ if $n$ is odd and $k=2$ if $n$ is even.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Servaes You should fix your answer. According to your definition of $f$, $f(1)=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Apr 1 at 8:41










  • $begingroup$
    @PierreCarre I have attempted to fix my answer; my earlier approach was not very fruitful so it is quite a different answer now.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Apr 1 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    In your first long formula you have $i-i$ where it should be $i-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Apr 2 at 6:39










  • $begingroup$
    @LutzL Thanks for spotting, it should be $1-i$.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Apr 2 at 14:55















1












$begingroup$

Let $ngeq3$ and let $x_i:=fracin-1$ so that we want to determine the maximum of the polynomial
$$f_n(x):=prod_i=1^n(x-x_i)=prod_i=1^nleft(x-frac1-in-1right),$$
on the interval $[0,1]$. If $n$ is odd then for all $xin(x_1,x_2)$ and $i>2$ we have
$$frac1-in-1<x-x_i<frac2-in-1<0,$$
from which it follows that
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)prod_i=3^nfrac2-in-1
<f_n(x)
<(x-x_1)(x-x_2)prod_i=3^nfrac1-in-1.$$

The maximum of $(x-x_1)(x-x_2)$ on the interval $(x_1,x_2)$ is at the midpoint $fracx_1+x_22=frac12(n-1)$, yielding the following bounds for the maximum $M_n$ of $f_n$ on the interval $(x_1,x_2)$:
$$M_n
>left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_1right)left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_2right)prod_i=3^nfrac2-in-1
=frac14frac(n-2)!(n-1)^n.
$$

$$M_n
<left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_1right)left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_2right)prod_i=3^nfrac1-in-1
=frac14frac(n-1)!(n-1)^n,$$

Similarly, if $n$ is even then for all $xin(x_2,x_3)$ and $i>3$ we have
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)prod_i=4^nfrac3-in-1
<f_n(x)
<(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)prod_i=4^nfrac2-in-1,$$

and some basic algebra shows that the maximum of $(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)$ is at $x=frac1+sqrt33(n-1)$, so
$$M_n>left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_1right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_2right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_3right)prod_i=4^nfrac3-in-1
=2fracsqrt39frac(n-3)!(n-1)^n,$$

$$M_n<left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_1right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_2right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_3right)prod_i=4^nfrac2-in-1
=2fracsqrt39frac(n-2)!(n-1)^n.$$




Proof that the maximum is in $(x_1,x_2)$ if $n$ is odd, and in $(x_2,x_3)$ if $n$ is even:



(A bit messy, might clean up later)



It it not hard to see that for $xin(x_k,x_k+1)$
we have $operatornamesgnf(x)=(-1)^n-k$. So the maximum is in some interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$ with $kequiv npmod2$.



The symmetry in the product shows that for all $xin(0,1]$ we have
$$fleft(x-frac1n-1right)
=fracx-x_nx-x_1fleft(xright)
=(1-x^-1)f(x),$$

and of course for $xin[tfrac12,1]$ we have $|1-x^-1|leq1$, so the maximum value of $f$ on the interval $[tfrac12,1]$ is assumed on the interval $(x_n-2,x_n-1)$. It is clear that
$$f(1-x)=(-1)^nf(x),$$
for all $xin[0,1]$, from which it follows that the maximum value of $f$ on the interval $[0,1]$ is assumed on $(x_1,x_2)$ if $n$ is odd, and on $(x_2,x_3)$ if $n$ is even.



The polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ has precisely $n$ distinct roots in the interval $[0,1]$. It follows that the polynomial $f'$ has precisely one root in each interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$ for $kin1,ldots,n-1$. The maximum of $f$ is then assumed at the unique root of $f'$ in the interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$, where $k=1$ if $n$ is odd and $k=2$ if $n$ is even.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Servaes You should fix your answer. According to your definition of $f$, $f(1)=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Apr 1 at 8:41










  • $begingroup$
    @PierreCarre I have attempted to fix my answer; my earlier approach was not very fruitful so it is quite a different answer now.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Apr 1 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    In your first long formula you have $i-i$ where it should be $i-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Apr 2 at 6:39










  • $begingroup$
    @LutzL Thanks for spotting, it should be $1-i$.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Apr 2 at 14:55













1












1








1





$begingroup$

Let $ngeq3$ and let $x_i:=fracin-1$ so that we want to determine the maximum of the polynomial
$$f_n(x):=prod_i=1^n(x-x_i)=prod_i=1^nleft(x-frac1-in-1right),$$
on the interval $[0,1]$. If $n$ is odd then for all $xin(x_1,x_2)$ and $i>2$ we have
$$frac1-in-1<x-x_i<frac2-in-1<0,$$
from which it follows that
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)prod_i=3^nfrac2-in-1
<f_n(x)
<(x-x_1)(x-x_2)prod_i=3^nfrac1-in-1.$$

The maximum of $(x-x_1)(x-x_2)$ on the interval $(x_1,x_2)$ is at the midpoint $fracx_1+x_22=frac12(n-1)$, yielding the following bounds for the maximum $M_n$ of $f_n$ on the interval $(x_1,x_2)$:
$$M_n
>left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_1right)left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_2right)prod_i=3^nfrac2-in-1
=frac14frac(n-2)!(n-1)^n.
$$

$$M_n
<left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_1right)left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_2right)prod_i=3^nfrac1-in-1
=frac14frac(n-1)!(n-1)^n,$$

Similarly, if $n$ is even then for all $xin(x_2,x_3)$ and $i>3$ we have
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)prod_i=4^nfrac3-in-1
<f_n(x)
<(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)prod_i=4^nfrac2-in-1,$$

and some basic algebra shows that the maximum of $(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)$ is at $x=frac1+sqrt33(n-1)$, so
$$M_n>left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_1right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_2right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_3right)prod_i=4^nfrac3-in-1
=2fracsqrt39frac(n-3)!(n-1)^n,$$

$$M_n<left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_1right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_2right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_3right)prod_i=4^nfrac2-in-1
=2fracsqrt39frac(n-2)!(n-1)^n.$$




Proof that the maximum is in $(x_1,x_2)$ if $n$ is odd, and in $(x_2,x_3)$ if $n$ is even:



(A bit messy, might clean up later)



It it not hard to see that for $xin(x_k,x_k+1)$
we have $operatornamesgnf(x)=(-1)^n-k$. So the maximum is in some interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$ with $kequiv npmod2$.



The symmetry in the product shows that for all $xin(0,1]$ we have
$$fleft(x-frac1n-1right)
=fracx-x_nx-x_1fleft(xright)
=(1-x^-1)f(x),$$

and of course for $xin[tfrac12,1]$ we have $|1-x^-1|leq1$, so the maximum value of $f$ on the interval $[tfrac12,1]$ is assumed on the interval $(x_n-2,x_n-1)$. It is clear that
$$f(1-x)=(-1)^nf(x),$$
for all $xin[0,1]$, from which it follows that the maximum value of $f$ on the interval $[0,1]$ is assumed on $(x_1,x_2)$ if $n$ is odd, and on $(x_2,x_3)$ if $n$ is even.



The polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ has precisely $n$ distinct roots in the interval $[0,1]$. It follows that the polynomial $f'$ has precisely one root in each interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$ for $kin1,ldots,n-1$. The maximum of $f$ is then assumed at the unique root of $f'$ in the interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$, where $k=1$ if $n$ is odd and $k=2$ if $n$ is even.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Let $ngeq3$ and let $x_i:=fracin-1$ so that we want to determine the maximum of the polynomial
$$f_n(x):=prod_i=1^n(x-x_i)=prod_i=1^nleft(x-frac1-in-1right),$$
on the interval $[0,1]$. If $n$ is odd then for all $xin(x_1,x_2)$ and $i>2$ we have
$$frac1-in-1<x-x_i<frac2-in-1<0,$$
from which it follows that
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)prod_i=3^nfrac2-in-1
<f_n(x)
<(x-x_1)(x-x_2)prod_i=3^nfrac1-in-1.$$

The maximum of $(x-x_1)(x-x_2)$ on the interval $(x_1,x_2)$ is at the midpoint $fracx_1+x_22=frac12(n-1)$, yielding the following bounds for the maximum $M_n$ of $f_n$ on the interval $(x_1,x_2)$:
$$M_n
>left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_1right)left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_2right)prod_i=3^nfrac2-in-1
=frac14frac(n-2)!(n-1)^n.
$$

$$M_n
<left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_1right)left(tfrac12(n-1)-x_2right)prod_i=3^nfrac1-in-1
=frac14frac(n-1)!(n-1)^n,$$

Similarly, if $n$ is even then for all $xin(x_2,x_3)$ and $i>3$ we have
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)prod_i=4^nfrac3-in-1
<f_n(x)
<(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)prod_i=4^nfrac2-in-1,$$

and some basic algebra shows that the maximum of $(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)$ is at $x=frac1+sqrt33(n-1)$, so
$$M_n>left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_1right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_2right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_3right)prod_i=4^nfrac3-in-1
=2fracsqrt39frac(n-3)!(n-1)^n,$$

$$M_n<left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_1right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_2right)
left(tfrac1+sqrt33(n-1)-x_3right)prod_i=4^nfrac2-in-1
=2fracsqrt39frac(n-2)!(n-1)^n.$$




Proof that the maximum is in $(x_1,x_2)$ if $n$ is odd, and in $(x_2,x_3)$ if $n$ is even:



(A bit messy, might clean up later)



It it not hard to see that for $xin(x_k,x_k+1)$
we have $operatornamesgnf(x)=(-1)^n-k$. So the maximum is in some interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$ with $kequiv npmod2$.



The symmetry in the product shows that for all $xin(0,1]$ we have
$$fleft(x-frac1n-1right)
=fracx-x_nx-x_1fleft(xright)
=(1-x^-1)f(x),$$

and of course for $xin[tfrac12,1]$ we have $|1-x^-1|leq1$, so the maximum value of $f$ on the interval $[tfrac12,1]$ is assumed on the interval $(x_n-2,x_n-1)$. It is clear that
$$f(1-x)=(-1)^nf(x),$$
for all $xin[0,1]$, from which it follows that the maximum value of $f$ on the interval $[0,1]$ is assumed on $(x_1,x_2)$ if $n$ is odd, and on $(x_2,x_3)$ if $n$ is even.



The polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ has precisely $n$ distinct roots in the interval $[0,1]$. It follows that the polynomial $f'$ has precisely one root in each interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$ for $kin1,ldots,n-1$. The maximum of $f$ is then assumed at the unique root of $f'$ in the interval $(x_k,x_k+1)$, where $k=1$ if $n$ is odd and $k=2$ if $n$ is even.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Apr 2 at 14:54

























answered Apr 1 at 2:08









ServaesServaes

30.6k342101




30.6k342101











  • $begingroup$
    @Servaes You should fix your answer. According to your definition of $f$, $f(1)=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Apr 1 at 8:41










  • $begingroup$
    @PierreCarre I have attempted to fix my answer; my earlier approach was not very fruitful so it is quite a different answer now.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Apr 1 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    In your first long formula you have $i-i$ where it should be $i-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Apr 2 at 6:39










  • $begingroup$
    @LutzL Thanks for spotting, it should be $1-i$.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Apr 2 at 14:55
















  • $begingroup$
    @Servaes You should fix your answer. According to your definition of $f$, $f(1)=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Apr 1 at 8:41










  • $begingroup$
    @PierreCarre I have attempted to fix my answer; my earlier approach was not very fruitful so it is quite a different answer now.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Apr 1 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    In your first long formula you have $i-i$ where it should be $i-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Apr 2 at 6:39










  • $begingroup$
    @LutzL Thanks for spotting, it should be $1-i$.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Apr 2 at 14:55















$begingroup$
@Servaes You should fix your answer. According to your definition of $f$, $f(1)=0$.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Apr 1 at 8:41




$begingroup$
@Servaes You should fix your answer. According to your definition of $f$, $f(1)=0$.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Apr 1 at 8:41












$begingroup$
@PierreCarre I have attempted to fix my answer; my earlier approach was not very fruitful so it is quite a different answer now.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Apr 1 at 12:18




$begingroup$
@PierreCarre I have attempted to fix my answer; my earlier approach was not very fruitful so it is quite a different answer now.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Apr 1 at 12:18












$begingroup$
In your first long formula you have $i-i$ where it should be $i-1$.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Apr 2 at 6:39




$begingroup$
In your first long formula you have $i-i$ where it should be $i-1$.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Apr 2 at 6:39












$begingroup$
@LutzL Thanks for spotting, it should be $1-i$.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Apr 2 at 14:55




$begingroup$
@LutzL Thanks for spotting, it should be $1-i$.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Apr 2 at 14:55

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170072%2fupper-bound-for-polynomial-using-evenly-spaced-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ