Identification between von Neumann algebras and measure spaces Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Correct Formulation of a map between two measurable spacesAbstract Von Neumann AlgebrasIsn't the center of a von Neumann algebra on a separable Hilbert space a hyperfinite von Neumann subalgebra?von Neumann Algebras and measuresNormal positive functional on Von Neumann algebrasnon abelian von Neumann algebrasEquivalent definitions for normal maps between von-Neumann algebrasConcrete examples of von Neumann algebrasvon Neumann algebraClassification of $C^*$ algebras whose subalgebra generated by projections is a von neumann algebravon Neumann sub algebras of $L^infty$

What is a Meta algorithm?

Examples of mediopassive verb constructions

How can players work together to take actions that are otherwise impossible?

How to assign captions for two tables in LaTeX?

When to stop saving and start investing?

How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?

How to find all the available tools in macOS terminal?

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

Gastric acid as a weapon

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

What are the motives behind Cersei's orders given to Bronn?

What are the pros and cons of Aerospike nosecones?

Do you forfeit tax refunds/credits if you aren't required to and don't file by April 15?

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

How do I mention the quality of my school without bragging

Models of set theory where not every set can be linearly ordered

I am not a queen, who am I?

What is this single-engine low-wing propeller plane?

Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author

Is there a Spanish version of "dot your i's and cross your t's" that includes the letter 'ñ'?

Should gear shift center itself while in neutral?



Identification between von Neumann algebras and measure spaces



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Correct Formulation of a map between two measurable spacesAbstract Von Neumann AlgebrasIsn't the center of a von Neumann algebra on a separable Hilbert space a hyperfinite von Neumann subalgebra?von Neumann Algebras and measuresNormal positive functional on Von Neumann algebrasnon abelian von Neumann algebrasEquivalent definitions for normal maps between von-Neumann algebrasConcrete examples of von Neumann algebrasvon Neumann algebraClassification of $C^*$ algebras whose subalgebra generated by projections is a von neumann algebravon Neumann sub algebras of $L^infty$










2












$begingroup$


I could show that if $pi:(X.mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ is a measurable map with $pi_*(nu)<<eta$, then the induced map $tildepi: L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)to L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$ with $tildepi(f)=fcircpi$ is well defined. Moreover, I could show that $|tildepi(f)|_infty le |f|_infty$. The link to the same can be found here. It is clear that $tildepi$ defined above a $*$-homomorphism. Since $tildepileft(L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$is norm closed $*$-subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$, it is also weak$^*$-closed, hence a von Neumann subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$.



I am trying to know if the converse to the above holds:



Suppose that $mathcalA$ is a von Neumann subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$. Then there exists a measurable map $pi:(X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ with $pi_*(nu)<<eta$ such that $mathcalA$ is isomorphic to $L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)$ as a von Neumann algebra.



I came across the theorem of Mackey which is known as Mackey's point realization which says the following: Let $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ be a standard Borel space and let $mathcalA'subset mathcalM$ be a sub-sigma algebra which is $nu$-complete. Then there exists a standard Borel space $(Y,mathcalN,eta)$ and a measurable map $pi: (X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ with $pi_*(nu)=eta$ and $mathcalA'=pi^-1(E): E in mathcalN$



I am trying to use this theorem to establish my claim. First, since $mathcalA$ is an abelian von Neumann algebra, $mathcalA$ is of the form $L^infty(Z,mathcalN',eta')$. Let $mathcalA'=varphi(chi_E): E in mathcalN'$, where $varphi$ is the weak$^*$ isomorphism between $mathcalA$ and $L^infty(Z,mathcalN',eta')$. I think that $varphi$ must take characteristic functions to characteristic functions and that $varphi(chi_E)=chi_varphi(E)$. If this is the case, then $mathcalA'$ is a sub-sigma algebra of $mathcalM$. I want to show that $mathcalA'$ is $nu$-complete. Towards that end, let $S subsetvarphi(E)$ such that $nu(varphi(E))=0$. The completeness of $nu$ is not a big deal as I can always complete the sub-sigma algebra by adding the subsets of the measure zero sets but I am not sure if there is any other way of proving this. The only other possibility is that $S=varphi(varphi^-1(S))$ but why should $varphi^-1(S) in mathcalN'$?



Assuming all these, I am a little confused as to what I have shown in all these and how to go forward. A little hint would suffice.



Thanks for the help!!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    It seems that Mackey's theorem could only help if you actually know that $X$ is standard Borel.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 1 at 23:22















2












$begingroup$


I could show that if $pi:(X.mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ is a measurable map with $pi_*(nu)<<eta$, then the induced map $tildepi: L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)to L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$ with $tildepi(f)=fcircpi$ is well defined. Moreover, I could show that $|tildepi(f)|_infty le |f|_infty$. The link to the same can be found here. It is clear that $tildepi$ defined above a $*$-homomorphism. Since $tildepileft(L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$is norm closed $*$-subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$, it is also weak$^*$-closed, hence a von Neumann subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$.



I am trying to know if the converse to the above holds:



Suppose that $mathcalA$ is a von Neumann subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$. Then there exists a measurable map $pi:(X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ with $pi_*(nu)<<eta$ such that $mathcalA$ is isomorphic to $L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)$ as a von Neumann algebra.



I came across the theorem of Mackey which is known as Mackey's point realization which says the following: Let $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ be a standard Borel space and let $mathcalA'subset mathcalM$ be a sub-sigma algebra which is $nu$-complete. Then there exists a standard Borel space $(Y,mathcalN,eta)$ and a measurable map $pi: (X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ with $pi_*(nu)=eta$ and $mathcalA'=pi^-1(E): E in mathcalN$



I am trying to use this theorem to establish my claim. First, since $mathcalA$ is an abelian von Neumann algebra, $mathcalA$ is of the form $L^infty(Z,mathcalN',eta')$. Let $mathcalA'=varphi(chi_E): E in mathcalN'$, where $varphi$ is the weak$^*$ isomorphism between $mathcalA$ and $L^infty(Z,mathcalN',eta')$. I think that $varphi$ must take characteristic functions to characteristic functions and that $varphi(chi_E)=chi_varphi(E)$. If this is the case, then $mathcalA'$ is a sub-sigma algebra of $mathcalM$. I want to show that $mathcalA'$ is $nu$-complete. Towards that end, let $S subsetvarphi(E)$ such that $nu(varphi(E))=0$. The completeness of $nu$ is not a big deal as I can always complete the sub-sigma algebra by adding the subsets of the measure zero sets but I am not sure if there is any other way of proving this. The only other possibility is that $S=varphi(varphi^-1(S))$ but why should $varphi^-1(S) in mathcalN'$?



Assuming all these, I am a little confused as to what I have shown in all these and how to go forward. A little hint would suffice.



Thanks for the help!!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    It seems that Mackey's theorem could only help if you actually know that $X$ is standard Borel.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 1 at 23:22













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I could show that if $pi:(X.mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ is a measurable map with $pi_*(nu)<<eta$, then the induced map $tildepi: L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)to L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$ with $tildepi(f)=fcircpi$ is well defined. Moreover, I could show that $|tildepi(f)|_infty le |f|_infty$. The link to the same can be found here. It is clear that $tildepi$ defined above a $*$-homomorphism. Since $tildepileft(L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$is norm closed $*$-subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$, it is also weak$^*$-closed, hence a von Neumann subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$.



I am trying to know if the converse to the above holds:



Suppose that $mathcalA$ is a von Neumann subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$. Then there exists a measurable map $pi:(X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ with $pi_*(nu)<<eta$ such that $mathcalA$ is isomorphic to $L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)$ as a von Neumann algebra.



I came across the theorem of Mackey which is known as Mackey's point realization which says the following: Let $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ be a standard Borel space and let $mathcalA'subset mathcalM$ be a sub-sigma algebra which is $nu$-complete. Then there exists a standard Borel space $(Y,mathcalN,eta)$ and a measurable map $pi: (X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ with $pi_*(nu)=eta$ and $mathcalA'=pi^-1(E): E in mathcalN$



I am trying to use this theorem to establish my claim. First, since $mathcalA$ is an abelian von Neumann algebra, $mathcalA$ is of the form $L^infty(Z,mathcalN',eta')$. Let $mathcalA'=varphi(chi_E): E in mathcalN'$, where $varphi$ is the weak$^*$ isomorphism between $mathcalA$ and $L^infty(Z,mathcalN',eta')$. I think that $varphi$ must take characteristic functions to characteristic functions and that $varphi(chi_E)=chi_varphi(E)$. If this is the case, then $mathcalA'$ is a sub-sigma algebra of $mathcalM$. I want to show that $mathcalA'$ is $nu$-complete. Towards that end, let $S subsetvarphi(E)$ such that $nu(varphi(E))=0$. The completeness of $nu$ is not a big deal as I can always complete the sub-sigma algebra by adding the subsets of the measure zero sets but I am not sure if there is any other way of proving this. The only other possibility is that $S=varphi(varphi^-1(S))$ but why should $varphi^-1(S) in mathcalN'$?



Assuming all these, I am a little confused as to what I have shown in all these and how to go forward. A little hint would suffice.



Thanks for the help!!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I could show that if $pi:(X.mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ is a measurable map with $pi_*(nu)<<eta$, then the induced map $tildepi: L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)to L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$ with $tildepi(f)=fcircpi$ is well defined. Moreover, I could show that $|tildepi(f)|_infty le |f|_infty$. The link to the same can be found here. It is clear that $tildepi$ defined above a $*$-homomorphism. Since $tildepileft(L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$is norm closed $*$-subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$, it is also weak$^*$-closed, hence a von Neumann subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$.



I am trying to know if the converse to the above holds:



Suppose that $mathcalA$ is a von Neumann subalgebra of $L^infty(X,mathcalM,nu)$. Then there exists a measurable map $pi:(X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ with $pi_*(nu)<<eta$ such that $mathcalA$ is isomorphic to $L^infty(Y,mathcalN,eta)$ as a von Neumann algebra.



I came across the theorem of Mackey which is known as Mackey's point realization which says the following: Let $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ be a standard Borel space and let $mathcalA'subset mathcalM$ be a sub-sigma algebra which is $nu$-complete. Then there exists a standard Borel space $(Y,mathcalN,eta)$ and a measurable map $pi: (X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ with $pi_*(nu)=eta$ and $mathcalA'=pi^-1(E): E in mathcalN$



I am trying to use this theorem to establish my claim. First, since $mathcalA$ is an abelian von Neumann algebra, $mathcalA$ is of the form $L^infty(Z,mathcalN',eta')$. Let $mathcalA'=varphi(chi_E): E in mathcalN'$, where $varphi$ is the weak$^*$ isomorphism between $mathcalA$ and $L^infty(Z,mathcalN',eta')$. I think that $varphi$ must take characteristic functions to characteristic functions and that $varphi(chi_E)=chi_varphi(E)$. If this is the case, then $mathcalA'$ is a sub-sigma algebra of $mathcalM$. I want to show that $mathcalA'$ is $nu$-complete. Towards that end, let $S subsetvarphi(E)$ such that $nu(varphi(E))=0$. The completeness of $nu$ is not a big deal as I can always complete the sub-sigma algebra by adding the subsets of the measure zero sets but I am not sure if there is any other way of proving this. The only other possibility is that $S=varphi(varphi^-1(S))$ but why should $varphi^-1(S) in mathcalN'$?



Assuming all these, I am a little confused as to what I have shown in all these and how to go forward. A little hint would suffice.



Thanks for the help!!







functional-analysis measure-theory lp-spaces von-neumann-algebras






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 1 at 23:06







tattwamasi amrutam

















asked Apr 1 at 0:00









tattwamasi amrutamtattwamasi amrutam

8,29621643




8,29621643











  • $begingroup$
    It seems that Mackey's theorem could only help if you actually know that $X$ is standard Borel.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 1 at 23:22
















  • $begingroup$
    It seems that Mackey's theorem could only help if you actually know that $X$ is standard Borel.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 1 at 23:22















$begingroup$
It seems that Mackey's theorem could only help if you actually know that $X$ is standard Borel.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 1 at 23:22




$begingroup$
It seems that Mackey's theorem could only help if you actually know that $X$ is standard Borel.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 1 at 23:22










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

First, a comment on your first paragraph. A norm-closed subset is not necessarily weak$^*$-closed. What happens here is that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous.



As for your question, I think you don't gain anything from already having $mathcal A$ represented as $L^infty$. You already have $mathcal Asubset L^infty(X,mathcal M,nu)$. So you can take $Y$ as the support of $mathcal A$ (i.e., the union of all $E$ such that $1_Einmathcal A$; if $mathcal A$ has the same unit, you'll have $Y=X$). Then take $mathcal N=E: 1_Einmathcal A$; it is not hard to check that this is a $sigma$-algebra, using that $mathcal A$ is a von Neumann algebra. And let $eta=nu|_mathcal N$. You have by definition that all simple functions and their norm limits are in $mathcal A$, so $L^infty(Y,mathcal N,eta)subsetmathcal A$. And, conversely, because $mathcal N$ has all characteristic functions in $mathcal A$ (i.e., all the projections), then $mathcal Asubset L^infty(Y,mathcal N,eta)$, as any von Neumann algebra is the norm-closure of its projections.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!! I have a couple of questions: First, something like this won't be true if the assumption of $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ being standard Borel is removed? Second, to show that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous, we use the fact that $L^1(X,mathcalM,mu)^*=L^infty(X,mathcalM,mu)$, we show that $tildepi$ is of the form $T^*$ for some $T in Bleft(L^1(X,mathcalM,nu),L^1(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$?
    $endgroup$
    – tattwamasi amrutam
    Apr 1 at 15:33











  • $begingroup$
    Also for $mathcalN$, do we need $E$ to be chosen from $mathcalM$? Else, how does $eta$ make sense, unless $mathcalN$ is a sub-$sigma$ algebra of $mathcalM$?
    $endgroup$
    – tattwamasi amrutam
    Apr 1 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Standard Borel would imply that $L^2$ is separable, which I don't think is necessary. For the continuity of $tildepi$, yes as you say. For $mathcal N$, you want the $E$ to come from $mathcal A$, as you want to realize $mathcal A$. Since $mathcal A$ is in $L^infty(X, mathcal M,nu)$, if $1_Einmathcal A$ you have $Einmathcal M$. So $mathcal N$ is a subalgebra of $mathcal M$ by construction. As for your last question, you take $tildepi$ to be the inclusion. Since it's (trivially) weak$^*$-continuous, it is a dual. Note that $eta$ is the restriction of $nu$ to $mathcal N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 1 at 20:16







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, and so the absolute continuity condition is trivial, I think.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 2 at 13:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't see how you can deal with duals and double duals in this case. But I think you can do it explicity. Write $X=Ycup(Xsetminus Y)$; fix $x_0in Xsetminus Y$ and define $$pi(x)=begincases x,& xin Y\ x_0,& xnotin Yendcases$$ This $pi$ satisfies $tilde pi=j$ and $pi_*null eta$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 2 at 20:43











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170039%2fidentification-between-von-neumann-algebras-and-measure-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

First, a comment on your first paragraph. A norm-closed subset is not necessarily weak$^*$-closed. What happens here is that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous.



As for your question, I think you don't gain anything from already having $mathcal A$ represented as $L^infty$. You already have $mathcal Asubset L^infty(X,mathcal M,nu)$. So you can take $Y$ as the support of $mathcal A$ (i.e., the union of all $E$ such that $1_Einmathcal A$; if $mathcal A$ has the same unit, you'll have $Y=X$). Then take $mathcal N=E: 1_Einmathcal A$; it is not hard to check that this is a $sigma$-algebra, using that $mathcal A$ is a von Neumann algebra. And let $eta=nu|_mathcal N$. You have by definition that all simple functions and their norm limits are in $mathcal A$, so $L^infty(Y,mathcal N,eta)subsetmathcal A$. And, conversely, because $mathcal N$ has all characteristic functions in $mathcal A$ (i.e., all the projections), then $mathcal Asubset L^infty(Y,mathcal N,eta)$, as any von Neumann algebra is the norm-closure of its projections.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!! I have a couple of questions: First, something like this won't be true if the assumption of $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ being standard Borel is removed? Second, to show that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous, we use the fact that $L^1(X,mathcalM,mu)^*=L^infty(X,mathcalM,mu)$, we show that $tildepi$ is of the form $T^*$ for some $T in Bleft(L^1(X,mathcalM,nu),L^1(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$?
    $endgroup$
    – tattwamasi amrutam
    Apr 1 at 15:33











  • $begingroup$
    Also for $mathcalN$, do we need $E$ to be chosen from $mathcalM$? Else, how does $eta$ make sense, unless $mathcalN$ is a sub-$sigma$ algebra of $mathcalM$?
    $endgroup$
    – tattwamasi amrutam
    Apr 1 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Standard Borel would imply that $L^2$ is separable, which I don't think is necessary. For the continuity of $tildepi$, yes as you say. For $mathcal N$, you want the $E$ to come from $mathcal A$, as you want to realize $mathcal A$. Since $mathcal A$ is in $L^infty(X, mathcal M,nu)$, if $1_Einmathcal A$ you have $Einmathcal M$. So $mathcal N$ is a subalgebra of $mathcal M$ by construction. As for your last question, you take $tildepi$ to be the inclusion. Since it's (trivially) weak$^*$-continuous, it is a dual. Note that $eta$ is the restriction of $nu$ to $mathcal N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 1 at 20:16







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, and so the absolute continuity condition is trivial, I think.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 2 at 13:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't see how you can deal with duals and double duals in this case. But I think you can do it explicity. Write $X=Ycup(Xsetminus Y)$; fix $x_0in Xsetminus Y$ and define $$pi(x)=begincases x,& xin Y\ x_0,& xnotin Yendcases$$ This $pi$ satisfies $tilde pi=j$ and $pi_*null eta$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 2 at 20:43















1












$begingroup$

First, a comment on your first paragraph. A norm-closed subset is not necessarily weak$^*$-closed. What happens here is that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous.



As for your question, I think you don't gain anything from already having $mathcal A$ represented as $L^infty$. You already have $mathcal Asubset L^infty(X,mathcal M,nu)$. So you can take $Y$ as the support of $mathcal A$ (i.e., the union of all $E$ such that $1_Einmathcal A$; if $mathcal A$ has the same unit, you'll have $Y=X$). Then take $mathcal N=E: 1_Einmathcal A$; it is not hard to check that this is a $sigma$-algebra, using that $mathcal A$ is a von Neumann algebra. And let $eta=nu|_mathcal N$. You have by definition that all simple functions and their norm limits are in $mathcal A$, so $L^infty(Y,mathcal N,eta)subsetmathcal A$. And, conversely, because $mathcal N$ has all characteristic functions in $mathcal A$ (i.e., all the projections), then $mathcal Asubset L^infty(Y,mathcal N,eta)$, as any von Neumann algebra is the norm-closure of its projections.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!! I have a couple of questions: First, something like this won't be true if the assumption of $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ being standard Borel is removed? Second, to show that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous, we use the fact that $L^1(X,mathcalM,mu)^*=L^infty(X,mathcalM,mu)$, we show that $tildepi$ is of the form $T^*$ for some $T in Bleft(L^1(X,mathcalM,nu),L^1(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$?
    $endgroup$
    – tattwamasi amrutam
    Apr 1 at 15:33











  • $begingroup$
    Also for $mathcalN$, do we need $E$ to be chosen from $mathcalM$? Else, how does $eta$ make sense, unless $mathcalN$ is a sub-$sigma$ algebra of $mathcalM$?
    $endgroup$
    – tattwamasi amrutam
    Apr 1 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Standard Borel would imply that $L^2$ is separable, which I don't think is necessary. For the continuity of $tildepi$, yes as you say. For $mathcal N$, you want the $E$ to come from $mathcal A$, as you want to realize $mathcal A$. Since $mathcal A$ is in $L^infty(X, mathcal M,nu)$, if $1_Einmathcal A$ you have $Einmathcal M$. So $mathcal N$ is a subalgebra of $mathcal M$ by construction. As for your last question, you take $tildepi$ to be the inclusion. Since it's (trivially) weak$^*$-continuous, it is a dual. Note that $eta$ is the restriction of $nu$ to $mathcal N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 1 at 20:16







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, and so the absolute continuity condition is trivial, I think.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 2 at 13:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't see how you can deal with duals and double duals in this case. But I think you can do it explicity. Write $X=Ycup(Xsetminus Y)$; fix $x_0in Xsetminus Y$ and define $$pi(x)=begincases x,& xin Y\ x_0,& xnotin Yendcases$$ This $pi$ satisfies $tilde pi=j$ and $pi_*null eta$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 2 at 20:43













1












1








1





$begingroup$

First, a comment on your first paragraph. A norm-closed subset is not necessarily weak$^*$-closed. What happens here is that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous.



As for your question, I think you don't gain anything from already having $mathcal A$ represented as $L^infty$. You already have $mathcal Asubset L^infty(X,mathcal M,nu)$. So you can take $Y$ as the support of $mathcal A$ (i.e., the union of all $E$ such that $1_Einmathcal A$; if $mathcal A$ has the same unit, you'll have $Y=X$). Then take $mathcal N=E: 1_Einmathcal A$; it is not hard to check that this is a $sigma$-algebra, using that $mathcal A$ is a von Neumann algebra. And let $eta=nu|_mathcal N$. You have by definition that all simple functions and their norm limits are in $mathcal A$, so $L^infty(Y,mathcal N,eta)subsetmathcal A$. And, conversely, because $mathcal N$ has all characteristic functions in $mathcal A$ (i.e., all the projections), then $mathcal Asubset L^infty(Y,mathcal N,eta)$, as any von Neumann algebra is the norm-closure of its projections.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



First, a comment on your first paragraph. A norm-closed subset is not necessarily weak$^*$-closed. What happens here is that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous.



As for your question, I think you don't gain anything from already having $mathcal A$ represented as $L^infty$. You already have $mathcal Asubset L^infty(X,mathcal M,nu)$. So you can take $Y$ as the support of $mathcal A$ (i.e., the union of all $E$ such that $1_Einmathcal A$; if $mathcal A$ has the same unit, you'll have $Y=X$). Then take $mathcal N=E: 1_Einmathcal A$; it is not hard to check that this is a $sigma$-algebra, using that $mathcal A$ is a von Neumann algebra. And let $eta=nu|_mathcal N$. You have by definition that all simple functions and their norm limits are in $mathcal A$, so $L^infty(Y,mathcal N,eta)subsetmathcal A$. And, conversely, because $mathcal N$ has all characteristic functions in $mathcal A$ (i.e., all the projections), then $mathcal Asubset L^infty(Y,mathcal N,eta)$, as any von Neumann algebra is the norm-closure of its projections.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Apr 1 at 23:01

























answered Apr 1 at 1:51









Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

130k1184185




130k1184185











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!! I have a couple of questions: First, something like this won't be true if the assumption of $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ being standard Borel is removed? Second, to show that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous, we use the fact that $L^1(X,mathcalM,mu)^*=L^infty(X,mathcalM,mu)$, we show that $tildepi$ is of the form $T^*$ for some $T in Bleft(L^1(X,mathcalM,nu),L^1(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$?
    $endgroup$
    – tattwamasi amrutam
    Apr 1 at 15:33











  • $begingroup$
    Also for $mathcalN$, do we need $E$ to be chosen from $mathcalM$? Else, how does $eta$ make sense, unless $mathcalN$ is a sub-$sigma$ algebra of $mathcalM$?
    $endgroup$
    – tattwamasi amrutam
    Apr 1 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Standard Borel would imply that $L^2$ is separable, which I don't think is necessary. For the continuity of $tildepi$, yes as you say. For $mathcal N$, you want the $E$ to come from $mathcal A$, as you want to realize $mathcal A$. Since $mathcal A$ is in $L^infty(X, mathcal M,nu)$, if $1_Einmathcal A$ you have $Einmathcal M$. So $mathcal N$ is a subalgebra of $mathcal M$ by construction. As for your last question, you take $tildepi$ to be the inclusion. Since it's (trivially) weak$^*$-continuous, it is a dual. Note that $eta$ is the restriction of $nu$ to $mathcal N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 1 at 20:16







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, and so the absolute continuity condition is trivial, I think.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 2 at 13:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't see how you can deal with duals and double duals in this case. But I think you can do it explicity. Write $X=Ycup(Xsetminus Y)$; fix $x_0in Xsetminus Y$ and define $$pi(x)=begincases x,& xin Y\ x_0,& xnotin Yendcases$$ This $pi$ satisfies $tilde pi=j$ and $pi_*null eta$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 2 at 20:43
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!! I have a couple of questions: First, something like this won't be true if the assumption of $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ being standard Borel is removed? Second, to show that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous, we use the fact that $L^1(X,mathcalM,mu)^*=L^infty(X,mathcalM,mu)$, we show that $tildepi$ is of the form $T^*$ for some $T in Bleft(L^1(X,mathcalM,nu),L^1(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$?
    $endgroup$
    – tattwamasi amrutam
    Apr 1 at 15:33











  • $begingroup$
    Also for $mathcalN$, do we need $E$ to be chosen from $mathcalM$? Else, how does $eta$ make sense, unless $mathcalN$ is a sub-$sigma$ algebra of $mathcalM$?
    $endgroup$
    – tattwamasi amrutam
    Apr 1 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Standard Borel would imply that $L^2$ is separable, which I don't think is necessary. For the continuity of $tildepi$, yes as you say. For $mathcal N$, you want the $E$ to come from $mathcal A$, as you want to realize $mathcal A$. Since $mathcal A$ is in $L^infty(X, mathcal M,nu)$, if $1_Einmathcal A$ you have $Einmathcal M$. So $mathcal N$ is a subalgebra of $mathcal M$ by construction. As for your last question, you take $tildepi$ to be the inclusion. Since it's (trivially) weak$^*$-continuous, it is a dual. Note that $eta$ is the restriction of $nu$ to $mathcal N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 1 at 20:16







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, and so the absolute continuity condition is trivial, I think.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 2 at 13:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't see how you can deal with duals and double duals in this case. But I think you can do it explicity. Write $X=Ycup(Xsetminus Y)$; fix $x_0in Xsetminus Y$ and define $$pi(x)=begincases x,& xin Y\ x_0,& xnotin Yendcases$$ This $pi$ satisfies $tilde pi=j$ and $pi_*null eta$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Apr 2 at 20:43















$begingroup$
Thank you!! I have a couple of questions: First, something like this won't be true if the assumption of $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ being standard Borel is removed? Second, to show that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous, we use the fact that $L^1(X,mathcalM,mu)^*=L^infty(X,mathcalM,mu)$, we show that $tildepi$ is of the form $T^*$ for some $T in Bleft(L^1(X,mathcalM,nu),L^1(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$?
$endgroup$
– tattwamasi amrutam
Apr 1 at 15:33





$begingroup$
Thank you!! I have a couple of questions: First, something like this won't be true if the assumption of $(X,mathcalM,nu)$ being standard Borel is removed? Second, to show that $tildepi$ is weak$^*$-continuous, we use the fact that $L^1(X,mathcalM,mu)^*=L^infty(X,mathcalM,mu)$, we show that $tildepi$ is of the form $T^*$ for some $T in Bleft(L^1(X,mathcalM,nu),L^1(Y,mathcalN,eta)right)$?
$endgroup$
– tattwamasi amrutam
Apr 1 at 15:33













$begingroup$
Also for $mathcalN$, do we need $E$ to be chosen from $mathcalM$? Else, how does $eta$ make sense, unless $mathcalN$ is a sub-$sigma$ algebra of $mathcalM$?
$endgroup$
– tattwamasi amrutam
Apr 1 at 15:59




$begingroup$
Also for $mathcalN$, do we need $E$ to be chosen from $mathcalM$? Else, how does $eta$ make sense, unless $mathcalN$ is a sub-$sigma$ algebra of $mathcalM$?
$endgroup$
– tattwamasi amrutam
Apr 1 at 15:59




1




1




$begingroup$
Standard Borel would imply that $L^2$ is separable, which I don't think is necessary. For the continuity of $tildepi$, yes as you say. For $mathcal N$, you want the $E$ to come from $mathcal A$, as you want to realize $mathcal A$. Since $mathcal A$ is in $L^infty(X, mathcal M,nu)$, if $1_Einmathcal A$ you have $Einmathcal M$. So $mathcal N$ is a subalgebra of $mathcal M$ by construction. As for your last question, you take $tildepi$ to be the inclusion. Since it's (trivially) weak$^*$-continuous, it is a dual. Note that $eta$ is the restriction of $nu$ to $mathcal N$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 1 at 20:16





$begingroup$
Standard Borel would imply that $L^2$ is separable, which I don't think is necessary. For the continuity of $tildepi$, yes as you say. For $mathcal N$, you want the $E$ to come from $mathcal A$, as you want to realize $mathcal A$. Since $mathcal A$ is in $L^infty(X, mathcal M,nu)$, if $1_Einmathcal A$ you have $Einmathcal M$. So $mathcal N$ is a subalgebra of $mathcal M$ by construction. As for your last question, you take $tildepi$ to be the inclusion. Since it's (trivially) weak$^*$-continuous, it is a dual. Note that $eta$ is the restriction of $nu$ to $mathcal N$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 1 at 20:16





1




1




$begingroup$
Yes, and so the absolute continuity condition is trivial, I think.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 2 at 13:43




$begingroup$
Yes, and so the absolute continuity condition is trivial, I think.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 2 at 13:43




1




1




$begingroup$
I don't see how you can deal with duals and double duals in this case. But I think you can do it explicity. Write $X=Ycup(Xsetminus Y)$; fix $x_0in Xsetminus Y$ and define $$pi(x)=begincases x,& xin Y\ x_0,& xnotin Yendcases$$ This $pi$ satisfies $tilde pi=j$ and $pi_*null eta$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 2 at 20:43




$begingroup$
I don't see how you can deal with duals and double duals in this case. But I think you can do it explicity. Write $X=Ycup(Xsetminus Y)$; fix $x_0in Xsetminus Y$ and define $$pi(x)=begincases x,& xin Y\ x_0,& xnotin Yendcases$$ This $pi$ satisfies $tilde pi=j$ and $pi_*null eta$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 2 at 20:43

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170039%2fidentification-between-von-neumann-algebras-and-measure-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ