Expected Value question about married couples Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Arranging CouplesExpected number of married couples chosen out of 50 different peopleDividing 4 married couples into pairsBasic Probability Question Calculating Possible Team CombinationsWhat is the probability that no wife will be on the same team as her husband? that exactly $k$ teams are composed of married couples?Expected value of the number of teamsExpectation and Variance - Married CouplesIn question of ten married couples to be seated at five different tables, why do we not care about the other tables?Probability with 5 couplesExpected Value of number of teams with married couples
What makes black pepper strong or mild?
Does accepting a pardon have any bearing on trying that person for the same crime in a sovereign jurisdiction?
Proof involving the spectral radius and Jordan Canonical form
Why did the IBM 650 use bi-quinary?
If 'B is more likely given A', then 'A is more likely given B'
Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?
How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?
I need to find the potential function of a vector field.
Bonus calculation: Am I making a mountain out of a molehill?
How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?
What causes the vertical darker bands in my photo?
What is the musical term for a note that continously plays through a melody?
Java 8 stream max() function argument type Comparator vs Comparable
If Jon Snow became King of the Seven Kingdoms what would his regnal number be?
Doubts about chords
How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?
What happens to sewage if there is no river near by?
Why one of virtual NICs called bond0?
How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?
Is a manifold-with-boundary with given interior and non-empty boundary essentially unique?
Sorting numerically
Stars Make Stars
How to draw this diagram using TikZ package?
Can Pao de Queijo, and similar foods, be kosher for Passover?
Expected Value question about married couples
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Arranging CouplesExpected number of married couples chosen out of 50 different peopleDividing 4 married couples into pairsBasic Probability Question Calculating Possible Team CombinationsWhat is the probability that no wife will be on the same team as her husband? that exactly $k$ teams are composed of married couples?Expected value of the number of teamsExpectation and Variance - Married CouplesIn question of ten married couples to be seated at five different tables, why do we not care about the other tables?Probability with 5 couplesExpected Value of number of teams with married couples
$begingroup$
A group of 36 people, consisting of 18 married couples, are put into random teams of three for a scavenger hunt. In particular, let $a_1,a_2,ldots,a_36$ be the people, and assume that for each $iin[1..18]$, the pair $(a_2i-1,a_2i)$ is a married couple. An event organizer randomly permutes the people, and then for each $kin[1..12]$ assigns the people in positions $3k-2$, $3k-1$, and $3k$ to Team $k$. How many of the teams should we expect to contain married couples?
Am I in the right track with the following :
Let $A_i$ be the probability that a given team has a married couple. $P(A_i)$ = $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$
So we can think of $A_i$ = 1 if team has a married couple and $A_i$ = 0 if the team doesn't have a married couple.
So we can find the expected value of A if we find the expected values of $A_1$ + $A_2$ + ....$A_18$.
Since we know the probability that a team has a married couple is $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$, would the expected number of teams with married couples be :
E[A] = E[$A_1$ + $A_2$ + ....$A_18$] = 18 x $(A_i)$ or (18) x $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$
probability
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
A group of 36 people, consisting of 18 married couples, are put into random teams of three for a scavenger hunt. In particular, let $a_1,a_2,ldots,a_36$ be the people, and assume that for each $iin[1..18]$, the pair $(a_2i-1,a_2i)$ is a married couple. An event organizer randomly permutes the people, and then for each $kin[1..12]$ assigns the people in positions $3k-2$, $3k-1$, and $3k$ to Team $k$. How many of the teams should we expect to contain married couples?
Am I in the right track with the following :
Let $A_i$ be the probability that a given team has a married couple. $P(A_i)$ = $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$
So we can think of $A_i$ = 1 if team has a married couple and $A_i$ = 0 if the team doesn't have a married couple.
So we can find the expected value of A if we find the expected values of $A_1$ + $A_2$ + ....$A_18$.
Since we know the probability that a team has a married couple is $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$, would the expected number of teams with married couples be :
E[A] = E[$A_1$ + $A_2$ + ....$A_18$] = 18 x $(A_i)$ or (18) x $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$
probability
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Well...what's the probability that a randomly selected triple has no couples?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 1:04
$begingroup$
Suggestion: Try first to study a simpler problem with 6 persons and 2 teams. And then, 12 persons and 4 teams. Is there a pattern?
$endgroup$
– Ertxiem
Apr 1 at 1:09
$begingroup$
@lulu would it be 1 - ($(18times 34)$/$36choose3$)?
$endgroup$
– Robin
Apr 1 at 2:00
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it would! So then you know the probability that a randomly selected triple does contain a married couple. And once you know that linearity tells you...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:26
1
$begingroup$
Note: Your expression, while correct, is unnecessarily complicated. Having chosen one person, the next does not make a couple with probability $frac 3435$. Then, conditioned on that, the third also fails to make a couple with probability $frac 3234$. Hence the answer is the product $frac 3435times frac 3234$. As I say, that's the same as what you wrote, but maybe it's easier to work with.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:32
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
A group of 36 people, consisting of 18 married couples, are put into random teams of three for a scavenger hunt. In particular, let $a_1,a_2,ldots,a_36$ be the people, and assume that for each $iin[1..18]$, the pair $(a_2i-1,a_2i)$ is a married couple. An event organizer randomly permutes the people, and then for each $kin[1..12]$ assigns the people in positions $3k-2$, $3k-1$, and $3k$ to Team $k$. How many of the teams should we expect to contain married couples?
Am I in the right track with the following :
Let $A_i$ be the probability that a given team has a married couple. $P(A_i)$ = $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$
So we can think of $A_i$ = 1 if team has a married couple and $A_i$ = 0 if the team doesn't have a married couple.
So we can find the expected value of A if we find the expected values of $A_1$ + $A_2$ + ....$A_18$.
Since we know the probability that a team has a married couple is $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$, would the expected number of teams with married couples be :
E[A] = E[$A_1$ + $A_2$ + ....$A_18$] = 18 x $(A_i)$ or (18) x $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$
probability
$endgroup$
A group of 36 people, consisting of 18 married couples, are put into random teams of three for a scavenger hunt. In particular, let $a_1,a_2,ldots,a_36$ be the people, and assume that for each $iin[1..18]$, the pair $(a_2i-1,a_2i)$ is a married couple. An event organizer randomly permutes the people, and then for each $kin[1..12]$ assigns the people in positions $3k-2$, $3k-1$, and $3k$ to Team $k$. How many of the teams should we expect to contain married couples?
Am I in the right track with the following :
Let $A_i$ be the probability that a given team has a married couple. $P(A_i)$ = $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$
So we can think of $A_i$ = 1 if team has a married couple and $A_i$ = 0 if the team doesn't have a married couple.
So we can find the expected value of A if we find the expected values of $A_1$ + $A_2$ + ....$A_18$.
Since we know the probability that a team has a married couple is $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$, would the expected number of teams with married couples be :
E[A] = E[$A_1$ + $A_2$ + ....$A_18$] = 18 x $(A_i)$ or (18) x $(18times 34)$/$36choose3$
probability
probability
edited Apr 1 at 2:15
Robin
asked Apr 1 at 0:37
RobinRobin
675
675
1
$begingroup$
Well...what's the probability that a randomly selected triple has no couples?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 1:04
$begingroup$
Suggestion: Try first to study a simpler problem with 6 persons and 2 teams. And then, 12 persons and 4 teams. Is there a pattern?
$endgroup$
– Ertxiem
Apr 1 at 1:09
$begingroup$
@lulu would it be 1 - ($(18times 34)$/$36choose3$)?
$endgroup$
– Robin
Apr 1 at 2:00
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it would! So then you know the probability that a randomly selected triple does contain a married couple. And once you know that linearity tells you...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:26
1
$begingroup$
Note: Your expression, while correct, is unnecessarily complicated. Having chosen one person, the next does not make a couple with probability $frac 3435$. Then, conditioned on that, the third also fails to make a couple with probability $frac 3234$. Hence the answer is the product $frac 3435times frac 3234$. As I say, that's the same as what you wrote, but maybe it's easier to work with.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:32
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Well...what's the probability that a randomly selected triple has no couples?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 1:04
$begingroup$
Suggestion: Try first to study a simpler problem with 6 persons and 2 teams. And then, 12 persons and 4 teams. Is there a pattern?
$endgroup$
– Ertxiem
Apr 1 at 1:09
$begingroup$
@lulu would it be 1 - ($(18times 34)$/$36choose3$)?
$endgroup$
– Robin
Apr 1 at 2:00
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it would! So then you know the probability that a randomly selected triple does contain a married couple. And once you know that linearity tells you...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:26
1
$begingroup$
Note: Your expression, while correct, is unnecessarily complicated. Having chosen one person, the next does not make a couple with probability $frac 3435$. Then, conditioned on that, the third also fails to make a couple with probability $frac 3234$. Hence the answer is the product $frac 3435times frac 3234$. As I say, that's the same as what you wrote, but maybe it's easier to work with.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:32
1
1
$begingroup$
Well...what's the probability that a randomly selected triple has no couples?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 1:04
$begingroup$
Well...what's the probability that a randomly selected triple has no couples?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 1:04
$begingroup$
Suggestion: Try first to study a simpler problem with 6 persons and 2 teams. And then, 12 persons and 4 teams. Is there a pattern?
$endgroup$
– Ertxiem
Apr 1 at 1:09
$begingroup$
Suggestion: Try first to study a simpler problem with 6 persons and 2 teams. And then, 12 persons and 4 teams. Is there a pattern?
$endgroup$
– Ertxiem
Apr 1 at 1:09
$begingroup$
@lulu would it be 1 - ($(18times 34)$/$36choose3$)?
$endgroup$
– Robin
Apr 1 at 2:00
$begingroup$
@lulu would it be 1 - ($(18times 34)$/$36choose3$)?
$endgroup$
– Robin
Apr 1 at 2:00
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it would! So then you know the probability that a randomly selected triple does contain a married couple. And once you know that linearity tells you...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:26
$begingroup$
Yes, it would! So then you know the probability that a randomly selected triple does contain a married couple. And once you know that linearity tells you...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:26
1
1
$begingroup$
Note: Your expression, while correct, is unnecessarily complicated. Having chosen one person, the next does not make a couple with probability $frac 3435$. Then, conditioned on that, the third also fails to make a couple with probability $frac 3234$. Hence the answer is the product $frac 3435times frac 3234$. As I say, that's the same as what you wrote, but maybe it's easier to work with.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:32
$begingroup$
Note: Your expression, while correct, is unnecessarily complicated. Having chosen one person, the next does not make a couple with probability $frac 3435$. Then, conditioned on that, the third also fails to make a couple with probability $frac 3234$. Hence the answer is the product $frac 3435times frac 3234$. As I say, that's the same as what you wrote, but maybe it's easier to work with.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:32
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170064%2fexpected-value-question-about-married-couples%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170064%2fexpected-value-question-about-married-couples%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Well...what's the probability that a randomly selected triple has no couples?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 1:04
$begingroup$
Suggestion: Try first to study a simpler problem with 6 persons and 2 teams. And then, 12 persons and 4 teams. Is there a pattern?
$endgroup$
– Ertxiem
Apr 1 at 1:09
$begingroup$
@lulu would it be 1 - ($(18times 34)$/$36choose3$)?
$endgroup$
– Robin
Apr 1 at 2:00
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it would! So then you know the probability that a randomly selected triple does contain a married couple. And once you know that linearity tells you...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:26
1
$begingroup$
Note: Your expression, while correct, is unnecessarily complicated. Having chosen one person, the next does not make a couple with probability $frac 3435$. Then, conditioned on that, the third also fails to make a couple with probability $frac 3234$. Hence the answer is the product $frac 3435times frac 3234$. As I say, that's the same as what you wrote, but maybe it's easier to work with.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 1 at 9:32