Cobordant Map from May's Book Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Equivariance of a map from tom Diecks bookCobordant to sphere or homotopy sphereWhy are homotopy spheres spin-cobordant in dimensions divisible by 4?Equivalence class of cobordant manifolds is a setCobordant 1-manifolds are homologous?Cobordant of Dold manifold and Wu manifold via fibered classifying spacesWhen are homotopy-equivalent 4-manifolds s-cobordant?Thom Isomorphism TheoremLoop Space of $BU times mathbbZ$Cobordism Groups of Smooth Closed Manifolds
What is a Meta algorithm?
How to motivate offshore teams and trust them to deliver?
Why is black pepper both grey and black?
Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?
Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters
Can Pao de Queijo, and similar foods, be kosher for Passover?
Can inflation occur in a positive-sum game currency system such as the Stack Exchange reputation system?
Java 8 stream max() function argument type Comparator vs Comparable
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Is the address of a local variable a constexpr?
The logistics of corpse disposal
How to bypass password on Windows XP account?
What is the musical term for a note that continously plays through a melody?
Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?
What is the correct way to use the pinch test for dehydration?
Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?
What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?
Should I call the interviewer directly, if HR aren't responding?
List *all* the tuples!
Why one of virtual NICs called bond0?
Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg?
Does accepting a pardon have any bearing on trying that person for the same crime in a sovereign jurisdiction?
Did Xerox really develop the first LAN?
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
Cobordant Map from May's Book
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Equivariance of a map from tom Diecks bookCobordant to sphere or homotopy sphereWhy are homotopy spheres spin-cobordant in dimensions divisible by 4?Equivalence class of cobordant manifolds is a setCobordant 1-manifolds are homologous?Cobordant of Dold manifold and Wu manifold via fibered classifying spacesWhen are homotopy-equivalent 4-manifolds s-cobordant?Thom Isomorphism TheoremLoop Space of $BU times mathbbZ$Cobordism Groups of Smooth Closed Manifolds
$begingroup$
I have a question about an argument that occurred in the discussion about consequences of Bott periodicity in A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology by P. May on page 221. Here is the excerpt:
Firstly: we denote by $TO(q)$ the Thom space of the universal $q$-bundle $gamma_q: E_q to G_q(mathbbR)=BO(q)$.
In the excerpt May constructs a map $Tf_M circ t: S^n+q to TO(q)$ where $f_M: M to BO(q)$ is the classifying map.
My question is why is this map cobordant? Namely why does it respect the cobordism relations?
Especially that would mean that if we have two $n$-manifolds $M,N$ and a $n+1$-manifold $W$ with boundary $partial W =M coprod N $ then the map $Tf_W circ t$ should be nullhomotopic.
Intuitively I think the author means that the intuition behind it is that the homotopy is reached by "going along to inner" of $W$ from $M$ to $N$ but honestly it's to sloppy for me. I'm not sure why it should work globally.
Could anybody explain the argument and why it works ?
algebraic-topology vector-bundles cobordism
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a question about an argument that occurred in the discussion about consequences of Bott periodicity in A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology by P. May on page 221. Here is the excerpt:
Firstly: we denote by $TO(q)$ the Thom space of the universal $q$-bundle $gamma_q: E_q to G_q(mathbbR)=BO(q)$.
In the excerpt May constructs a map $Tf_M circ t: S^n+q to TO(q)$ where $f_M: M to BO(q)$ is the classifying map.
My question is why is this map cobordant? Namely why does it respect the cobordism relations?
Especially that would mean that if we have two $n$-manifolds $M,N$ and a $n+1$-manifold $W$ with boundary $partial W =M coprod N $ then the map $Tf_W circ t$ should be nullhomotopic.
Intuitively I think the author means that the intuition behind it is that the homotopy is reached by "going along to inner" of $W$ from $M$ to $N$ but honestly it's to sloppy for me. I'm not sure why it should work globally.
Could anybody explain the argument and why it works ?
algebraic-topology vector-bundles cobordism
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What do you mean by a cobordant map? And in the example you give, $W$ is not closed, so it is meaningless to discuss its cobordism class in this sense. What $Tf_Wcirc t$ should represent is an explicit homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc t$ and $Tf_Ncirc t$.
$endgroup$
– Tyrone
Apr 1 at 11:06
$begingroup$
@Tyrone: sorry I was here quite imprecise. Denote by $M_n$ the set of smooth closed $n$- manifolds. I meant by "cobordant map" the assignment $alpha: M_n to pi_n+q(TO(q)), M mapsto [Tf_Mcirc t]$ in the sense that it respects the cobordism relations and therefore factors through $mathcalN_n$. So despite of my unclear formulation your answer is precisely I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Apr 1 at 12:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a question about an argument that occurred in the discussion about consequences of Bott periodicity in A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology by P. May on page 221. Here is the excerpt:
Firstly: we denote by $TO(q)$ the Thom space of the universal $q$-bundle $gamma_q: E_q to G_q(mathbbR)=BO(q)$.
In the excerpt May constructs a map $Tf_M circ t: S^n+q to TO(q)$ where $f_M: M to BO(q)$ is the classifying map.
My question is why is this map cobordant? Namely why does it respect the cobordism relations?
Especially that would mean that if we have two $n$-manifolds $M,N$ and a $n+1$-manifold $W$ with boundary $partial W =M coprod N $ then the map $Tf_W circ t$ should be nullhomotopic.
Intuitively I think the author means that the intuition behind it is that the homotopy is reached by "going along to inner" of $W$ from $M$ to $N$ but honestly it's to sloppy for me. I'm not sure why it should work globally.
Could anybody explain the argument and why it works ?
algebraic-topology vector-bundles cobordism
$endgroup$
I have a question about an argument that occurred in the discussion about consequences of Bott periodicity in A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology by P. May on page 221. Here is the excerpt:
Firstly: we denote by $TO(q)$ the Thom space of the universal $q$-bundle $gamma_q: E_q to G_q(mathbbR)=BO(q)$.
In the excerpt May constructs a map $Tf_M circ t: S^n+q to TO(q)$ where $f_M: M to BO(q)$ is the classifying map.
My question is why is this map cobordant? Namely why does it respect the cobordism relations?
Especially that would mean that if we have two $n$-manifolds $M,N$ and a $n+1$-manifold $W$ with boundary $partial W =M coprod N $ then the map $Tf_W circ t$ should be nullhomotopic.
Intuitively I think the author means that the intuition behind it is that the homotopy is reached by "going along to inner" of $W$ from $M$ to $N$ but honestly it's to sloppy for me. I'm not sure why it should work globally.
Could anybody explain the argument and why it works ?
algebraic-topology vector-bundles cobordism
algebraic-topology vector-bundles cobordism
edited Apr 1 at 12:54
William
3,3011228
3,3011228
asked Apr 1 at 0:09
KarlPeterKarlPeter
7091416
7091416
$begingroup$
What do you mean by a cobordant map? And in the example you give, $W$ is not closed, so it is meaningless to discuss its cobordism class in this sense. What $Tf_Wcirc t$ should represent is an explicit homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc t$ and $Tf_Ncirc t$.
$endgroup$
– Tyrone
Apr 1 at 11:06
$begingroup$
@Tyrone: sorry I was here quite imprecise. Denote by $M_n$ the set of smooth closed $n$- manifolds. I meant by "cobordant map" the assignment $alpha: M_n to pi_n+q(TO(q)), M mapsto [Tf_Mcirc t]$ in the sense that it respects the cobordism relations and therefore factors through $mathcalN_n$. So despite of my unclear formulation your answer is precisely I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Apr 1 at 12:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What do you mean by a cobordant map? And in the example you give, $W$ is not closed, so it is meaningless to discuss its cobordism class in this sense. What $Tf_Wcirc t$ should represent is an explicit homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc t$ and $Tf_Ncirc t$.
$endgroup$
– Tyrone
Apr 1 at 11:06
$begingroup$
@Tyrone: sorry I was here quite imprecise. Denote by $M_n$ the set of smooth closed $n$- manifolds. I meant by "cobordant map" the assignment $alpha: M_n to pi_n+q(TO(q)), M mapsto [Tf_Mcirc t]$ in the sense that it respects the cobordism relations and therefore factors through $mathcalN_n$. So despite of my unclear formulation your answer is precisely I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Apr 1 at 12:14
$begingroup$
What do you mean by a cobordant map? And in the example you give, $W$ is not closed, so it is meaningless to discuss its cobordism class in this sense. What $Tf_Wcirc t$ should represent is an explicit homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc t$ and $Tf_Ncirc t$.
$endgroup$
– Tyrone
Apr 1 at 11:06
$begingroup$
What do you mean by a cobordant map? And in the example you give, $W$ is not closed, so it is meaningless to discuss its cobordism class in this sense. What $Tf_Wcirc t$ should represent is an explicit homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc t$ and $Tf_Ncirc t$.
$endgroup$
– Tyrone
Apr 1 at 11:06
$begingroup$
@Tyrone: sorry I was here quite imprecise. Denote by $M_n$ the set of smooth closed $n$- manifolds. I meant by "cobordant map" the assignment $alpha: M_n to pi_n+q(TO(q)), M mapsto [Tf_Mcirc t]$ in the sense that it respects the cobordism relations and therefore factors through $mathcalN_n$. So despite of my unclear formulation your answer is precisely I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Apr 1 at 12:14
$begingroup$
@Tyrone: sorry I was here quite imprecise. Denote by $M_n$ the set of smooth closed $n$- manifolds. I meant by "cobordant map" the assignment $alpha: M_n to pi_n+q(TO(q)), M mapsto [Tf_Mcirc t]$ in the sense that it respects the cobordism relations and therefore factors through $mathcalN_n$. So despite of my unclear formulation your answer is precisely I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Apr 1 at 12:14
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is the Pontryagin-Thom construction, which is a general mechanism for showing that a cobordism theory is given by homotopy groups of a Thom spectrum. I'll talk about some of the aspects but leave a lot of details out.
It can be easier to treat $mathcalN_n$ as the embedded cobordism groups, where each closed manifold $M^n$ is assumed to be embedded in $mathbbR^infty$, and a cobordism between $M$ and $N$ is a $W^n+1$ embedded in $mathbbR^infty times [0,1]$ such that $W|_0 cong M$ and $W|_1cong N$. You can show using the Whitney embedding theorem this is the same as considering abstract manifolds without embeddings.
Given an $Msubset mathbbR^infty$, by compactness $M$ is actually contained in $mathbbR^n+k$ for some finite $k$, with a $k$-dimensional normal bundle $nu$. If we pick $k$ high enough then the embedding is unique up to isotopy and so $nu$ is unique up to isomorphism. The bundle $nu$ admits a bundle map $varphicolonnu to gamma_k$ covering some $fcolon M to BO(k)$, and so there is an induced map on Thom spaces $Tfcolon Tnu to Tgamma_k$. If we choose an open tubular neighbourhood $U$ of $M$ in $mathbbR^n+k$, or equivalently in $S^n+k$, we get a collapse map $$ccolon S^n+k to S^n+k/U^c cong D(nu)/S(nu)=Tnu$$
In other words, for a chosen embedding $Msubset mathbbR^n+k$ we get a continuous function $S^n+kto Tgamma_k$ given by $Tfcirc c$, and if we pick $k$ high enough its homotopy class doesn't depend on the embedding. If we picked another $k'$ we would get a continuous function between different spaces $S^n+k'to Tgamma_k'$ but the idea is we end up getting an element of the limit
$$[Tfcirc c]inpi_n MO = lim_ktoinfty pi_n+kTgamma_k$$
Given a cobordism $W$ from $M$ to $N$, again we can pick some $k$ so that $W$ actually lives in $mathbbR^ktimes[0,1]$, and collapsing a tubular neighbourhood gives a map $Tf_Wcirc c_Wcolon S^n+ktimes [0,1] to Tgamma_k$ which is a homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc c_M$ and $Tf_Ncirc c_N$. This is roughly the sense in a cobordism of manifolds produces a homotopy of functions.
On the other hand, if $Hcolon S^n+ktimes [0,1] to Tgamma_k$ is a homotopy, we can assuming wlog that it is transverse to the $0$-section of $gamma_k$, i.e. the smooth manifold $BO(k)$, and then take the transverse intersection to produce a manifold $W$ of dimension $n+1$. The boundary is divided into two closed $n$-manifolds, one is $M=H_0^-1(BO(k))$ and the other is $N=H_1^-1(BO(k))$. This is roughly the way in which a homotopy of maps $S^n+kto Tgamma_k$ produces a cobordism.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170042%2fcobordant-map-from-mays-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is the Pontryagin-Thom construction, which is a general mechanism for showing that a cobordism theory is given by homotopy groups of a Thom spectrum. I'll talk about some of the aspects but leave a lot of details out.
It can be easier to treat $mathcalN_n$ as the embedded cobordism groups, where each closed manifold $M^n$ is assumed to be embedded in $mathbbR^infty$, and a cobordism between $M$ and $N$ is a $W^n+1$ embedded in $mathbbR^infty times [0,1]$ such that $W|_0 cong M$ and $W|_1cong N$. You can show using the Whitney embedding theorem this is the same as considering abstract manifolds without embeddings.
Given an $Msubset mathbbR^infty$, by compactness $M$ is actually contained in $mathbbR^n+k$ for some finite $k$, with a $k$-dimensional normal bundle $nu$. If we pick $k$ high enough then the embedding is unique up to isotopy and so $nu$ is unique up to isomorphism. The bundle $nu$ admits a bundle map $varphicolonnu to gamma_k$ covering some $fcolon M to BO(k)$, and so there is an induced map on Thom spaces $Tfcolon Tnu to Tgamma_k$. If we choose an open tubular neighbourhood $U$ of $M$ in $mathbbR^n+k$, or equivalently in $S^n+k$, we get a collapse map $$ccolon S^n+k to S^n+k/U^c cong D(nu)/S(nu)=Tnu$$
In other words, for a chosen embedding $Msubset mathbbR^n+k$ we get a continuous function $S^n+kto Tgamma_k$ given by $Tfcirc c$, and if we pick $k$ high enough its homotopy class doesn't depend on the embedding. If we picked another $k'$ we would get a continuous function between different spaces $S^n+k'to Tgamma_k'$ but the idea is we end up getting an element of the limit
$$[Tfcirc c]inpi_n MO = lim_ktoinfty pi_n+kTgamma_k$$
Given a cobordism $W$ from $M$ to $N$, again we can pick some $k$ so that $W$ actually lives in $mathbbR^ktimes[0,1]$, and collapsing a tubular neighbourhood gives a map $Tf_Wcirc c_Wcolon S^n+ktimes [0,1] to Tgamma_k$ which is a homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc c_M$ and $Tf_Ncirc c_N$. This is roughly the sense in a cobordism of manifolds produces a homotopy of functions.
On the other hand, if $Hcolon S^n+ktimes [0,1] to Tgamma_k$ is a homotopy, we can assuming wlog that it is transverse to the $0$-section of $gamma_k$, i.e. the smooth manifold $BO(k)$, and then take the transverse intersection to produce a manifold $W$ of dimension $n+1$. The boundary is divided into two closed $n$-manifolds, one is $M=H_0^-1(BO(k))$ and the other is $N=H_1^-1(BO(k))$. This is roughly the way in which a homotopy of maps $S^n+kto Tgamma_k$ produces a cobordism.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is the Pontryagin-Thom construction, which is a general mechanism for showing that a cobordism theory is given by homotopy groups of a Thom spectrum. I'll talk about some of the aspects but leave a lot of details out.
It can be easier to treat $mathcalN_n$ as the embedded cobordism groups, where each closed manifold $M^n$ is assumed to be embedded in $mathbbR^infty$, and a cobordism between $M$ and $N$ is a $W^n+1$ embedded in $mathbbR^infty times [0,1]$ such that $W|_0 cong M$ and $W|_1cong N$. You can show using the Whitney embedding theorem this is the same as considering abstract manifolds without embeddings.
Given an $Msubset mathbbR^infty$, by compactness $M$ is actually contained in $mathbbR^n+k$ for some finite $k$, with a $k$-dimensional normal bundle $nu$. If we pick $k$ high enough then the embedding is unique up to isotopy and so $nu$ is unique up to isomorphism. The bundle $nu$ admits a bundle map $varphicolonnu to gamma_k$ covering some $fcolon M to BO(k)$, and so there is an induced map on Thom spaces $Tfcolon Tnu to Tgamma_k$. If we choose an open tubular neighbourhood $U$ of $M$ in $mathbbR^n+k$, or equivalently in $S^n+k$, we get a collapse map $$ccolon S^n+k to S^n+k/U^c cong D(nu)/S(nu)=Tnu$$
In other words, for a chosen embedding $Msubset mathbbR^n+k$ we get a continuous function $S^n+kto Tgamma_k$ given by $Tfcirc c$, and if we pick $k$ high enough its homotopy class doesn't depend on the embedding. If we picked another $k'$ we would get a continuous function between different spaces $S^n+k'to Tgamma_k'$ but the idea is we end up getting an element of the limit
$$[Tfcirc c]inpi_n MO = lim_ktoinfty pi_n+kTgamma_k$$
Given a cobordism $W$ from $M$ to $N$, again we can pick some $k$ so that $W$ actually lives in $mathbbR^ktimes[0,1]$, and collapsing a tubular neighbourhood gives a map $Tf_Wcirc c_Wcolon S^n+ktimes [0,1] to Tgamma_k$ which is a homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc c_M$ and $Tf_Ncirc c_N$. This is roughly the sense in a cobordism of manifolds produces a homotopy of functions.
On the other hand, if $Hcolon S^n+ktimes [0,1] to Tgamma_k$ is a homotopy, we can assuming wlog that it is transverse to the $0$-section of $gamma_k$, i.e. the smooth manifold $BO(k)$, and then take the transverse intersection to produce a manifold $W$ of dimension $n+1$. The boundary is divided into two closed $n$-manifolds, one is $M=H_0^-1(BO(k))$ and the other is $N=H_1^-1(BO(k))$. This is roughly the way in which a homotopy of maps $S^n+kto Tgamma_k$ produces a cobordism.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is the Pontryagin-Thom construction, which is a general mechanism for showing that a cobordism theory is given by homotopy groups of a Thom spectrum. I'll talk about some of the aspects but leave a lot of details out.
It can be easier to treat $mathcalN_n$ as the embedded cobordism groups, where each closed manifold $M^n$ is assumed to be embedded in $mathbbR^infty$, and a cobordism between $M$ and $N$ is a $W^n+1$ embedded in $mathbbR^infty times [0,1]$ such that $W|_0 cong M$ and $W|_1cong N$. You can show using the Whitney embedding theorem this is the same as considering abstract manifolds without embeddings.
Given an $Msubset mathbbR^infty$, by compactness $M$ is actually contained in $mathbbR^n+k$ for some finite $k$, with a $k$-dimensional normal bundle $nu$. If we pick $k$ high enough then the embedding is unique up to isotopy and so $nu$ is unique up to isomorphism. The bundle $nu$ admits a bundle map $varphicolonnu to gamma_k$ covering some $fcolon M to BO(k)$, and so there is an induced map on Thom spaces $Tfcolon Tnu to Tgamma_k$. If we choose an open tubular neighbourhood $U$ of $M$ in $mathbbR^n+k$, or equivalently in $S^n+k$, we get a collapse map $$ccolon S^n+k to S^n+k/U^c cong D(nu)/S(nu)=Tnu$$
In other words, for a chosen embedding $Msubset mathbbR^n+k$ we get a continuous function $S^n+kto Tgamma_k$ given by $Tfcirc c$, and if we pick $k$ high enough its homotopy class doesn't depend on the embedding. If we picked another $k'$ we would get a continuous function between different spaces $S^n+k'to Tgamma_k'$ but the idea is we end up getting an element of the limit
$$[Tfcirc c]inpi_n MO = lim_ktoinfty pi_n+kTgamma_k$$
Given a cobordism $W$ from $M$ to $N$, again we can pick some $k$ so that $W$ actually lives in $mathbbR^ktimes[0,1]$, and collapsing a tubular neighbourhood gives a map $Tf_Wcirc c_Wcolon S^n+ktimes [0,1] to Tgamma_k$ which is a homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc c_M$ and $Tf_Ncirc c_N$. This is roughly the sense in a cobordism of manifolds produces a homotopy of functions.
On the other hand, if $Hcolon S^n+ktimes [0,1] to Tgamma_k$ is a homotopy, we can assuming wlog that it is transverse to the $0$-section of $gamma_k$, i.e. the smooth manifold $BO(k)$, and then take the transverse intersection to produce a manifold $W$ of dimension $n+1$. The boundary is divided into two closed $n$-manifolds, one is $M=H_0^-1(BO(k))$ and the other is $N=H_1^-1(BO(k))$. This is roughly the way in which a homotopy of maps $S^n+kto Tgamma_k$ produces a cobordism.
$endgroup$
This is the Pontryagin-Thom construction, which is a general mechanism for showing that a cobordism theory is given by homotopy groups of a Thom spectrum. I'll talk about some of the aspects but leave a lot of details out.
It can be easier to treat $mathcalN_n$ as the embedded cobordism groups, where each closed manifold $M^n$ is assumed to be embedded in $mathbbR^infty$, and a cobordism between $M$ and $N$ is a $W^n+1$ embedded in $mathbbR^infty times [0,1]$ such that $W|_0 cong M$ and $W|_1cong N$. You can show using the Whitney embedding theorem this is the same as considering abstract manifolds without embeddings.
Given an $Msubset mathbbR^infty$, by compactness $M$ is actually contained in $mathbbR^n+k$ for some finite $k$, with a $k$-dimensional normal bundle $nu$. If we pick $k$ high enough then the embedding is unique up to isotopy and so $nu$ is unique up to isomorphism. The bundle $nu$ admits a bundle map $varphicolonnu to gamma_k$ covering some $fcolon M to BO(k)$, and so there is an induced map on Thom spaces $Tfcolon Tnu to Tgamma_k$. If we choose an open tubular neighbourhood $U$ of $M$ in $mathbbR^n+k$, or equivalently in $S^n+k$, we get a collapse map $$ccolon S^n+k to S^n+k/U^c cong D(nu)/S(nu)=Tnu$$
In other words, for a chosen embedding $Msubset mathbbR^n+k$ we get a continuous function $S^n+kto Tgamma_k$ given by $Tfcirc c$, and if we pick $k$ high enough its homotopy class doesn't depend on the embedding. If we picked another $k'$ we would get a continuous function between different spaces $S^n+k'to Tgamma_k'$ but the idea is we end up getting an element of the limit
$$[Tfcirc c]inpi_n MO = lim_ktoinfty pi_n+kTgamma_k$$
Given a cobordism $W$ from $M$ to $N$, again we can pick some $k$ so that $W$ actually lives in $mathbbR^ktimes[0,1]$, and collapsing a tubular neighbourhood gives a map $Tf_Wcirc c_Wcolon S^n+ktimes [0,1] to Tgamma_k$ which is a homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc c_M$ and $Tf_Ncirc c_N$. This is roughly the sense in a cobordism of manifolds produces a homotopy of functions.
On the other hand, if $Hcolon S^n+ktimes [0,1] to Tgamma_k$ is a homotopy, we can assuming wlog that it is transverse to the $0$-section of $gamma_k$, i.e. the smooth manifold $BO(k)$, and then take the transverse intersection to produce a manifold $W$ of dimension $n+1$. The boundary is divided into two closed $n$-manifolds, one is $M=H_0^-1(BO(k))$ and the other is $N=H_1^-1(BO(k))$. This is roughly the way in which a homotopy of maps $S^n+kto Tgamma_k$ produces a cobordism.
edited Apr 1 at 20:26
answered Apr 1 at 12:52
WilliamWilliam
3,3011228
3,3011228
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170042%2fcobordant-map-from-mays-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What do you mean by a cobordant map? And in the example you give, $W$ is not closed, so it is meaningless to discuss its cobordism class in this sense. What $Tf_Wcirc t$ should represent is an explicit homotopy between $Tf_Mcirc t$ and $Tf_Ncirc t$.
$endgroup$
– Tyrone
Apr 1 at 11:06
$begingroup$
@Tyrone: sorry I was here quite imprecise. Denote by $M_n$ the set of smooth closed $n$- manifolds. I meant by "cobordant map" the assignment $alpha: M_n to pi_n+q(TO(q)), M mapsto [Tf_Mcirc t]$ in the sense that it respects the cobordism relations and therefore factors through $mathcalN_n$. So despite of my unclear formulation your answer is precisely I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Apr 1 at 12:14