Graph of the history of databases Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What is the history of data compression tools on personal computers?The history of context switchAre there any articles elucidating the history of the POPCOUNT instruction?Power of university computer in the '70s?History behind the text column restrictionWhat is the history of the PDP-11 MARK instruction?MITS to Dell: the mail order gap?History of Ctrl-S and Ctrl-Q for flow controlHistory of the demise of Matrox from the world of 3D graphics cardsHistory of advanced hardware
How does cp -a work
How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?
Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?
How does a Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death feature work with Touch-range spells delivered by familiars?
Models of set theory where not every set can be linearly ordered
When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?
3 doors, three guards, one stone
Antler Helmet: Can it work?
Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?
Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?
Is it true to say that an hosting provider's DNS server is what links the entire hosting environment to ICANN?
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
What causes the vertical darker bands in my photo?
How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?
What is this single-engine low-wing propeller plane?
Is there a service that would inform me whenever a new direct route is scheduled from a given airport?
What is the longest distance a 13th-level monk can jump while attacking on the same turn?
How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?
Bonus calculation: Am I making a mountain out of a molehill?
Can Pao de Queijo, and similar foods, be kosher for Passover?
Is high blood pressure ever a symptom attributable solely to dehydration?
How to find all the available tools in macOS terminal?
Storing hydrofluoric acid before the invention of plastics
Why did the IBM 650 use bi-quinary?
Graph of the history of databases
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What is the history of data compression tools on personal computers?The history of context switchAre there any articles elucidating the history of the POPCOUNT instruction?Power of university computer in the '70s?History behind the text column restrictionWhat is the history of the PDP-11 MARK instruction?MITS to Dell: the mail order gap?History of Ctrl-S and Ctrl-Q for flow controlHistory of the demise of Matrox from the world of 3D graphics cardsHistory of advanced hardware
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.9k455162
add a comment |
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.9k455162
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06
add a comment |
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.9k455162
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
history databases
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.9k455162
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.9k455162
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.9k455162
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.9k455162
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.9k455162
10.9k455162
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06
add a comment |
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06
3
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9497%2fgraph-of-the-history-of-databases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
add a comment |
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
add a comment |
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
34124
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
add a comment |
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9497%2fgraph-of-the-history-of-databases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06