Unique line in $mathbbP^4$ intersecting three pairwise non-intersecting lines not in a hyperplane.Show that three pairwise non-intersecting lines in $mathbbRmathbbP^3$ have a transversal.Projective line intersecting 3 projective subspacesNon-tangent lines to lines in $mathbbP^3(mathbbC)$.Lines in dual projective spaceProjective Geometry QuestionDetermine lines intersecting four skew lines in $mathbbP^3$Intersection of ray with plane given in homogeneous coordinatesLine intersecting three lines in $mathbbP^4$ that are not in one hyperplaneWhat are pairwise non-intersecting lines in $mathbbP^4$Dimension in $mathbbP^4$ of $langle L,M rangle cap N$ with $L,M,N$ pairwise non-intersecting and not in one hyperplane

Can my sorcerer use a spellbook only to collect spells and scribe scrolls, not cast?

A category-like structure without composition?

Is there an expression that means doing something right before you will need it rather than doing it in case you might need it?

Are there any examples of a variable being normally distributed that is *not* due to the Central Limit Theorem?

Size of subfigure fitting its content (tikzpicture)

Is it logically or scientifically possible to artificially send energy to the body?

One verb to replace 'be a member of' a club

Extract rows of a table, that include less than x NULLs

Why was the shrinking from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?

How do I handle a potential work/personal life conflict as the manager of one of my friends?

In 'Revenger,' what does 'cove' come from?

What exploit Are these user agents trying to use?

Bullying boss launched a smear campaign and made me unemployable

Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?

Is it acceptable for a professor to tell male students to not think that they are smarter than female students?

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

Why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?

All in one piece, we mend holes in your socks

What does the expression "A Mann!" means



Unique line in $mathbbP^4$ intersecting three pairwise non-intersecting lines not in a hyperplane.


Show that three pairwise non-intersecting lines in $mathbbRmathbbP^3$ have a transversal.Projective line intersecting 3 projective subspacesNon-tangent lines to lines in $mathbbP^3(mathbbC)$.Lines in dual projective spaceProjective Geometry QuestionDetermine lines intersecting four skew lines in $mathbbP^3$Intersection of ray with plane given in homogeneous coordinatesLine intersecting three lines in $mathbbP^4$ that are not in one hyperplaneWhat are pairwise non-intersecting lines in $mathbbP^4$Dimension in $mathbbP^4$ of $langle L,M rangle cap N$ with $L,M,N$ pairwise non-intersecting and not in one hyperplane













0












$begingroup$


I need to show that there is a unique line (in $mathbbP^4$ I assume, or could they also mean in $mathbbR^5$?) that intersects three lines $L,M,N$ which are pairwise non-intersecting and not in the same hyperplane.



In a previous exercise I worked out that $dim(langle L, Mrangle cap N)=0$, so a single point in $mathbbP^4$.



I think I have to use this dimension, but I'm not sure what it means. It says $langle L, Mrangle$ is the union of all lines through $L$ and $M$. So is $langle L, Mrangle cap N$ then the set of all lines through all three lines?



Other things I tried:



I know that $langle L, M, N rangle = 4$, since these lines are not in the same hyperplane.



Let $P$ be a point on $L$. Let $Pi$ be the plane containing $M$ and $P$. In the same way we can construct a plane $Pi'$ through $N$ and $P$. But I don't know if I'm going in the good direction, I simply don't know how to visualize this stuff in higher dimensions..










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    I need to show that there is a unique line (in $mathbbP^4$ I assume, or could they also mean in $mathbbR^5$?) that intersects three lines $L,M,N$ which are pairwise non-intersecting and not in the same hyperplane.



    In a previous exercise I worked out that $dim(langle L, Mrangle cap N)=0$, so a single point in $mathbbP^4$.



    I think I have to use this dimension, but I'm not sure what it means. It says $langle L, Mrangle$ is the union of all lines through $L$ and $M$. So is $langle L, Mrangle cap N$ then the set of all lines through all three lines?



    Other things I tried:



    I know that $langle L, M, N rangle = 4$, since these lines are not in the same hyperplane.



    Let $P$ be a point on $L$. Let $Pi$ be the plane containing $M$ and $P$. In the same way we can construct a plane $Pi'$ through $N$ and $P$. But I don't know if I'm going in the good direction, I simply don't know how to visualize this stuff in higher dimensions..










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I need to show that there is a unique line (in $mathbbP^4$ I assume, or could they also mean in $mathbbR^5$?) that intersects three lines $L,M,N$ which are pairwise non-intersecting and not in the same hyperplane.



      In a previous exercise I worked out that $dim(langle L, Mrangle cap N)=0$, so a single point in $mathbbP^4$.



      I think I have to use this dimension, but I'm not sure what it means. It says $langle L, Mrangle$ is the union of all lines through $L$ and $M$. So is $langle L, Mrangle cap N$ then the set of all lines through all three lines?



      Other things I tried:



      I know that $langle L, M, N rangle = 4$, since these lines are not in the same hyperplane.



      Let $P$ be a point on $L$. Let $Pi$ be the plane containing $M$ and $P$. In the same way we can construct a plane $Pi'$ through $N$ and $P$. But I don't know if I'm going in the good direction, I simply don't know how to visualize this stuff in higher dimensions..










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I need to show that there is a unique line (in $mathbbP^4$ I assume, or could they also mean in $mathbbR^5$?) that intersects three lines $L,M,N$ which are pairwise non-intersecting and not in the same hyperplane.



      In a previous exercise I worked out that $dim(langle L, Mrangle cap N)=0$, so a single point in $mathbbP^4$.



      I think I have to use this dimension, but I'm not sure what it means. It says $langle L, Mrangle$ is the union of all lines through $L$ and $M$. So is $langle L, Mrangle cap N$ then the set of all lines through all three lines?



      Other things I tried:



      I know that $langle L, M, N rangle = 4$, since these lines are not in the same hyperplane.



      Let $P$ be a point on $L$. Let $Pi$ be the plane containing $M$ and $P$. In the same way we can construct a plane $Pi'$ through $N$ and $P$. But I don't know if I'm going in the good direction, I simply don't know how to visualize this stuff in higher dimensions..







      projective-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 28 at 20:42









      The Coding WombatThe Coding Wombat

      315110




      315110




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The key here is that $langle L,Mrangle$ here is a hyperplane, three-dimensional in $mathbbP^4$. There is, as you have noted, a single point $x$ where $N$ meets this hyperplane.



          Now, the union of all lines through $x$ that intersect $L$ is a 2-d plane in $langle L,Mrangle$. Similarly, the union of lines through $x$ intersecting $M$ is another 2-d plane in $langle L,Mrangle$. The intersection of these planes will be a line; it can't be a plane because then $L$ and $M$ would intersect, and a dimension argument says it's at least a line. That line passes through $x$, so it's one of the lines that defines each of the planes, and thus it's the line we seek.



          Now, seeing how this fits together, an explicit construction:



          Define the lines $L$, $M$, $N$ as follows: $L=ax_1+bx_2mid a,bin mathbbR$, $M=cy_1+dy_2mid c,din mathbbR$, $N=ez_1+fz_2mid e,fin mathbbR$ where $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ are pairs of points on each line, with coordinates in $mathbbR^5setminus 0$. All of these use the description of $mathbbP^4$ as the quotient of $mathbbR^5$ minus the origin by $mathbbR^*$.



          Now, the six 5-tuples $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ in $mathbbR^5$ must have a nontrivial linear dependence relation; there are constants $A,B,C,D,E,F$ not all zero so that $Ax_1+Bx_2+Cy_1+Dy_2+Ez_1+Fz_2 = 0$. These constants can be found by Gaussian elimination on the matrix with rows $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ augmented with a $6times 6$ identity.



          Since the lines don't lie in a hyperplane, our six points must span $mathbbR^5$, and the constants $A,B,C,D,E,F$ are unique up to constant multiples. Also, since $L$ and $M$ don't intersect, there's no nontrivial linear combination of $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2$ that's zero - which means that at least one of $E$ and $F$ is nonzero. Similarly, at least one of $A$ and $B$ is nonzero, and at least one of $C$ and $D$ is nonzero.



          The line we seek is the set of linear combinations $$alpha(Ax_1+Bx_2)+beta(Cy_1+Dy_2)+gamma(Ez_1+Fz_2)mid (alpha,beta,gamma)in mathbbR^3$$
          Since the three vectors $Ax_1+Bx_2$, $Cy_1+Dy_2$, $Ez_1+Fz_2$ are linearly dependent, that's a $2$-dimensional subset of $mathbbR^5$, which projects to a line. It intersects $L$ at $Ax_1+Bx_2$ for $alpha=1,beta=0,gamma=0$ and similarly for the other two lines. We could also eliminate the redundancy by restricting to $alpha+beta+gamma=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            How do you see all lines from $L$ through $x$ lie in $langle L, M rangle$? Wouldn't that mean that all these lines also go through $M$, since $langle L, M rangle$ is the set of all lines going through $L$ and $M$? Wouldn't that then mean that there are infinitely many lines through $L, M$ and $N$?
            $endgroup$
            – The Coding Wombat
            Mar 28 at 22:03










          • $begingroup$
            $langle L, Mrangle$ isn't a set of lines. It's a set of points - each point in it lies in some line intersecting both $L$ and $M$. That set of points is a 3-d hyperplane. If we take some random line composed of points in it, that probably won't be one of the lines we used to define it, so there's no reason to expect it will intersect either $L$ or $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 28 at 22:13










          • $begingroup$
            How do we know the line is unique? Couldn't there be a line through L,M and N, not going through $x$?
            $endgroup$
            – The Coding Wombat
            Mar 28 at 22:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            No. $x$ is the only point on $N$ that lies on any line intersecting $L$ and $M$. That's what your previous exercise result is telling you. We have to work a bit constructing the line and showing that it's the only line that works, but that any such line goes through $x$? We know that from the start. (In my explicit construction, $x$ is the point $Ez_1+Fz_2$.)
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 28 at 22:48











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3166400%2funique-line-in-mathbbp4-intersecting-three-pairwise-non-intersecting-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          The key here is that $langle L,Mrangle$ here is a hyperplane, three-dimensional in $mathbbP^4$. There is, as you have noted, a single point $x$ where $N$ meets this hyperplane.



          Now, the union of all lines through $x$ that intersect $L$ is a 2-d plane in $langle L,Mrangle$. Similarly, the union of lines through $x$ intersecting $M$ is another 2-d plane in $langle L,Mrangle$. The intersection of these planes will be a line; it can't be a plane because then $L$ and $M$ would intersect, and a dimension argument says it's at least a line. That line passes through $x$, so it's one of the lines that defines each of the planes, and thus it's the line we seek.



          Now, seeing how this fits together, an explicit construction:



          Define the lines $L$, $M$, $N$ as follows: $L=ax_1+bx_2mid a,bin mathbbR$, $M=cy_1+dy_2mid c,din mathbbR$, $N=ez_1+fz_2mid e,fin mathbbR$ where $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ are pairs of points on each line, with coordinates in $mathbbR^5setminus 0$. All of these use the description of $mathbbP^4$ as the quotient of $mathbbR^5$ minus the origin by $mathbbR^*$.



          Now, the six 5-tuples $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ in $mathbbR^5$ must have a nontrivial linear dependence relation; there are constants $A,B,C,D,E,F$ not all zero so that $Ax_1+Bx_2+Cy_1+Dy_2+Ez_1+Fz_2 = 0$. These constants can be found by Gaussian elimination on the matrix with rows $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ augmented with a $6times 6$ identity.



          Since the lines don't lie in a hyperplane, our six points must span $mathbbR^5$, and the constants $A,B,C,D,E,F$ are unique up to constant multiples. Also, since $L$ and $M$ don't intersect, there's no nontrivial linear combination of $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2$ that's zero - which means that at least one of $E$ and $F$ is nonzero. Similarly, at least one of $A$ and $B$ is nonzero, and at least one of $C$ and $D$ is nonzero.



          The line we seek is the set of linear combinations $$alpha(Ax_1+Bx_2)+beta(Cy_1+Dy_2)+gamma(Ez_1+Fz_2)mid (alpha,beta,gamma)in mathbbR^3$$
          Since the three vectors $Ax_1+Bx_2$, $Cy_1+Dy_2$, $Ez_1+Fz_2$ are linearly dependent, that's a $2$-dimensional subset of $mathbbR^5$, which projects to a line. It intersects $L$ at $Ax_1+Bx_2$ for $alpha=1,beta=0,gamma=0$ and similarly for the other two lines. We could also eliminate the redundancy by restricting to $alpha+beta+gamma=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            How do you see all lines from $L$ through $x$ lie in $langle L, M rangle$? Wouldn't that mean that all these lines also go through $M$, since $langle L, M rangle$ is the set of all lines going through $L$ and $M$? Wouldn't that then mean that there are infinitely many lines through $L, M$ and $N$?
            $endgroup$
            – The Coding Wombat
            Mar 28 at 22:03










          • $begingroup$
            $langle L, Mrangle$ isn't a set of lines. It's a set of points - each point in it lies in some line intersecting both $L$ and $M$. That set of points is a 3-d hyperplane. If we take some random line composed of points in it, that probably won't be one of the lines we used to define it, so there's no reason to expect it will intersect either $L$ or $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 28 at 22:13










          • $begingroup$
            How do we know the line is unique? Couldn't there be a line through L,M and N, not going through $x$?
            $endgroup$
            – The Coding Wombat
            Mar 28 at 22:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            No. $x$ is the only point on $N$ that lies on any line intersecting $L$ and $M$. That's what your previous exercise result is telling you. We have to work a bit constructing the line and showing that it's the only line that works, but that any such line goes through $x$? We know that from the start. (In my explicit construction, $x$ is the point $Ez_1+Fz_2$.)
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 28 at 22:48















          2












          $begingroup$

          The key here is that $langle L,Mrangle$ here is a hyperplane, three-dimensional in $mathbbP^4$. There is, as you have noted, a single point $x$ where $N$ meets this hyperplane.



          Now, the union of all lines through $x$ that intersect $L$ is a 2-d plane in $langle L,Mrangle$. Similarly, the union of lines through $x$ intersecting $M$ is another 2-d plane in $langle L,Mrangle$. The intersection of these planes will be a line; it can't be a plane because then $L$ and $M$ would intersect, and a dimension argument says it's at least a line. That line passes through $x$, so it's one of the lines that defines each of the planes, and thus it's the line we seek.



          Now, seeing how this fits together, an explicit construction:



          Define the lines $L$, $M$, $N$ as follows: $L=ax_1+bx_2mid a,bin mathbbR$, $M=cy_1+dy_2mid c,din mathbbR$, $N=ez_1+fz_2mid e,fin mathbbR$ where $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ are pairs of points on each line, with coordinates in $mathbbR^5setminus 0$. All of these use the description of $mathbbP^4$ as the quotient of $mathbbR^5$ minus the origin by $mathbbR^*$.



          Now, the six 5-tuples $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ in $mathbbR^5$ must have a nontrivial linear dependence relation; there are constants $A,B,C,D,E,F$ not all zero so that $Ax_1+Bx_2+Cy_1+Dy_2+Ez_1+Fz_2 = 0$. These constants can be found by Gaussian elimination on the matrix with rows $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ augmented with a $6times 6$ identity.



          Since the lines don't lie in a hyperplane, our six points must span $mathbbR^5$, and the constants $A,B,C,D,E,F$ are unique up to constant multiples. Also, since $L$ and $M$ don't intersect, there's no nontrivial linear combination of $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2$ that's zero - which means that at least one of $E$ and $F$ is nonzero. Similarly, at least one of $A$ and $B$ is nonzero, and at least one of $C$ and $D$ is nonzero.



          The line we seek is the set of linear combinations $$alpha(Ax_1+Bx_2)+beta(Cy_1+Dy_2)+gamma(Ez_1+Fz_2)mid (alpha,beta,gamma)in mathbbR^3$$
          Since the three vectors $Ax_1+Bx_2$, $Cy_1+Dy_2$, $Ez_1+Fz_2$ are linearly dependent, that's a $2$-dimensional subset of $mathbbR^5$, which projects to a line. It intersects $L$ at $Ax_1+Bx_2$ for $alpha=1,beta=0,gamma=0$ and similarly for the other two lines. We could also eliminate the redundancy by restricting to $alpha+beta+gamma=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            How do you see all lines from $L$ through $x$ lie in $langle L, M rangle$? Wouldn't that mean that all these lines also go through $M$, since $langle L, M rangle$ is the set of all lines going through $L$ and $M$? Wouldn't that then mean that there are infinitely many lines through $L, M$ and $N$?
            $endgroup$
            – The Coding Wombat
            Mar 28 at 22:03










          • $begingroup$
            $langle L, Mrangle$ isn't a set of lines. It's a set of points - each point in it lies in some line intersecting both $L$ and $M$. That set of points is a 3-d hyperplane. If we take some random line composed of points in it, that probably won't be one of the lines we used to define it, so there's no reason to expect it will intersect either $L$ or $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 28 at 22:13










          • $begingroup$
            How do we know the line is unique? Couldn't there be a line through L,M and N, not going through $x$?
            $endgroup$
            – The Coding Wombat
            Mar 28 at 22:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            No. $x$ is the only point on $N$ that lies on any line intersecting $L$ and $M$. That's what your previous exercise result is telling you. We have to work a bit constructing the line and showing that it's the only line that works, but that any such line goes through $x$? We know that from the start. (In my explicit construction, $x$ is the point $Ez_1+Fz_2$.)
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 28 at 22:48













          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          The key here is that $langle L,Mrangle$ here is a hyperplane, three-dimensional in $mathbbP^4$. There is, as you have noted, a single point $x$ where $N$ meets this hyperplane.



          Now, the union of all lines through $x$ that intersect $L$ is a 2-d plane in $langle L,Mrangle$. Similarly, the union of lines through $x$ intersecting $M$ is another 2-d plane in $langle L,Mrangle$. The intersection of these planes will be a line; it can't be a plane because then $L$ and $M$ would intersect, and a dimension argument says it's at least a line. That line passes through $x$, so it's one of the lines that defines each of the planes, and thus it's the line we seek.



          Now, seeing how this fits together, an explicit construction:



          Define the lines $L$, $M$, $N$ as follows: $L=ax_1+bx_2mid a,bin mathbbR$, $M=cy_1+dy_2mid c,din mathbbR$, $N=ez_1+fz_2mid e,fin mathbbR$ where $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ are pairs of points on each line, with coordinates in $mathbbR^5setminus 0$. All of these use the description of $mathbbP^4$ as the quotient of $mathbbR^5$ minus the origin by $mathbbR^*$.



          Now, the six 5-tuples $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ in $mathbbR^5$ must have a nontrivial linear dependence relation; there are constants $A,B,C,D,E,F$ not all zero so that $Ax_1+Bx_2+Cy_1+Dy_2+Ez_1+Fz_2 = 0$. These constants can be found by Gaussian elimination on the matrix with rows $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ augmented with a $6times 6$ identity.



          Since the lines don't lie in a hyperplane, our six points must span $mathbbR^5$, and the constants $A,B,C,D,E,F$ are unique up to constant multiples. Also, since $L$ and $M$ don't intersect, there's no nontrivial linear combination of $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2$ that's zero - which means that at least one of $E$ and $F$ is nonzero. Similarly, at least one of $A$ and $B$ is nonzero, and at least one of $C$ and $D$ is nonzero.



          The line we seek is the set of linear combinations $$alpha(Ax_1+Bx_2)+beta(Cy_1+Dy_2)+gamma(Ez_1+Fz_2)mid (alpha,beta,gamma)in mathbbR^3$$
          Since the three vectors $Ax_1+Bx_2$, $Cy_1+Dy_2$, $Ez_1+Fz_2$ are linearly dependent, that's a $2$-dimensional subset of $mathbbR^5$, which projects to a line. It intersects $L$ at $Ax_1+Bx_2$ for $alpha=1,beta=0,gamma=0$ and similarly for the other two lines. We could also eliminate the redundancy by restricting to $alpha+beta+gamma=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The key here is that $langle L,Mrangle$ here is a hyperplane, three-dimensional in $mathbbP^4$. There is, as you have noted, a single point $x$ where $N$ meets this hyperplane.



          Now, the union of all lines through $x$ that intersect $L$ is a 2-d plane in $langle L,Mrangle$. Similarly, the union of lines through $x$ intersecting $M$ is another 2-d plane in $langle L,Mrangle$. The intersection of these planes will be a line; it can't be a plane because then $L$ and $M$ would intersect, and a dimension argument says it's at least a line. That line passes through $x$, so it's one of the lines that defines each of the planes, and thus it's the line we seek.



          Now, seeing how this fits together, an explicit construction:



          Define the lines $L$, $M$, $N$ as follows: $L=ax_1+bx_2mid a,bin mathbbR$, $M=cy_1+dy_2mid c,din mathbbR$, $N=ez_1+fz_2mid e,fin mathbbR$ where $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ are pairs of points on each line, with coordinates in $mathbbR^5setminus 0$. All of these use the description of $mathbbP^4$ as the quotient of $mathbbR^5$ minus the origin by $mathbbR^*$.



          Now, the six 5-tuples $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ in $mathbbR^5$ must have a nontrivial linear dependence relation; there are constants $A,B,C,D,E,F$ not all zero so that $Ax_1+Bx_2+Cy_1+Dy_2+Ez_1+Fz_2 = 0$. These constants can be found by Gaussian elimination on the matrix with rows $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2,z_1,z_2$ augmented with a $6times 6$ identity.



          Since the lines don't lie in a hyperplane, our six points must span $mathbbR^5$, and the constants $A,B,C,D,E,F$ are unique up to constant multiples. Also, since $L$ and $M$ don't intersect, there's no nontrivial linear combination of $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2$ that's zero - which means that at least one of $E$ and $F$ is nonzero. Similarly, at least one of $A$ and $B$ is nonzero, and at least one of $C$ and $D$ is nonzero.



          The line we seek is the set of linear combinations $$alpha(Ax_1+Bx_2)+beta(Cy_1+Dy_2)+gamma(Ez_1+Fz_2)mid (alpha,beta,gamma)in mathbbR^3$$
          Since the three vectors $Ax_1+Bx_2$, $Cy_1+Dy_2$, $Ez_1+Fz_2$ are linearly dependent, that's a $2$-dimensional subset of $mathbbR^5$, which projects to a line. It intersects $L$ at $Ax_1+Bx_2$ for $alpha=1,beta=0,gamma=0$ and similarly for the other two lines. We could also eliminate the redundancy by restricting to $alpha+beta+gamma=0$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 28 at 21:37









          jmerryjmerry

          17k11633




          17k11633











          • $begingroup$
            How do you see all lines from $L$ through $x$ lie in $langle L, M rangle$? Wouldn't that mean that all these lines also go through $M$, since $langle L, M rangle$ is the set of all lines going through $L$ and $M$? Wouldn't that then mean that there are infinitely many lines through $L, M$ and $N$?
            $endgroup$
            – The Coding Wombat
            Mar 28 at 22:03










          • $begingroup$
            $langle L, Mrangle$ isn't a set of lines. It's a set of points - each point in it lies in some line intersecting both $L$ and $M$. That set of points is a 3-d hyperplane. If we take some random line composed of points in it, that probably won't be one of the lines we used to define it, so there's no reason to expect it will intersect either $L$ or $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 28 at 22:13










          • $begingroup$
            How do we know the line is unique? Couldn't there be a line through L,M and N, not going through $x$?
            $endgroup$
            – The Coding Wombat
            Mar 28 at 22:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            No. $x$ is the only point on $N$ that lies on any line intersecting $L$ and $M$. That's what your previous exercise result is telling you. We have to work a bit constructing the line and showing that it's the only line that works, but that any such line goes through $x$? We know that from the start. (In my explicit construction, $x$ is the point $Ez_1+Fz_2$.)
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 28 at 22:48
















          • $begingroup$
            How do you see all lines from $L$ through $x$ lie in $langle L, M rangle$? Wouldn't that mean that all these lines also go through $M$, since $langle L, M rangle$ is the set of all lines going through $L$ and $M$? Wouldn't that then mean that there are infinitely many lines through $L, M$ and $N$?
            $endgroup$
            – The Coding Wombat
            Mar 28 at 22:03










          • $begingroup$
            $langle L, Mrangle$ isn't a set of lines. It's a set of points - each point in it lies in some line intersecting both $L$ and $M$. That set of points is a 3-d hyperplane. If we take some random line composed of points in it, that probably won't be one of the lines we used to define it, so there's no reason to expect it will intersect either $L$ or $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 28 at 22:13










          • $begingroup$
            How do we know the line is unique? Couldn't there be a line through L,M and N, not going through $x$?
            $endgroup$
            – The Coding Wombat
            Mar 28 at 22:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            No. $x$ is the only point on $N$ that lies on any line intersecting $L$ and $M$. That's what your previous exercise result is telling you. We have to work a bit constructing the line and showing that it's the only line that works, but that any such line goes through $x$? We know that from the start. (In my explicit construction, $x$ is the point $Ez_1+Fz_2$.)
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 28 at 22:48















          $begingroup$
          How do you see all lines from $L$ through $x$ lie in $langle L, M rangle$? Wouldn't that mean that all these lines also go through $M$, since $langle L, M rangle$ is the set of all lines going through $L$ and $M$? Wouldn't that then mean that there are infinitely many lines through $L, M$ and $N$?
          $endgroup$
          – The Coding Wombat
          Mar 28 at 22:03




          $begingroup$
          How do you see all lines from $L$ through $x$ lie in $langle L, M rangle$? Wouldn't that mean that all these lines also go through $M$, since $langle L, M rangle$ is the set of all lines going through $L$ and $M$? Wouldn't that then mean that there are infinitely many lines through $L, M$ and $N$?
          $endgroup$
          – The Coding Wombat
          Mar 28 at 22:03












          $begingroup$
          $langle L, Mrangle$ isn't a set of lines. It's a set of points - each point in it lies in some line intersecting both $L$ and $M$. That set of points is a 3-d hyperplane. If we take some random line composed of points in it, that probably won't be one of the lines we used to define it, so there's no reason to expect it will intersect either $L$ or $M$.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 28 at 22:13




          $begingroup$
          $langle L, Mrangle$ isn't a set of lines. It's a set of points - each point in it lies in some line intersecting both $L$ and $M$. That set of points is a 3-d hyperplane. If we take some random line composed of points in it, that probably won't be one of the lines we used to define it, so there's no reason to expect it will intersect either $L$ or $M$.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 28 at 22:13












          $begingroup$
          How do we know the line is unique? Couldn't there be a line through L,M and N, not going through $x$?
          $endgroup$
          – The Coding Wombat
          Mar 28 at 22:19




          $begingroup$
          How do we know the line is unique? Couldn't there be a line through L,M and N, not going through $x$?
          $endgroup$
          – The Coding Wombat
          Mar 28 at 22:19




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          No. $x$ is the only point on $N$ that lies on any line intersecting $L$ and $M$. That's what your previous exercise result is telling you. We have to work a bit constructing the line and showing that it's the only line that works, but that any such line goes through $x$? We know that from the start. (In my explicit construction, $x$ is the point $Ez_1+Fz_2$.)
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 28 at 22:48




          $begingroup$
          No. $x$ is the only point on $N$ that lies on any line intersecting $L$ and $M$. That's what your previous exercise result is telling you. We have to work a bit constructing the line and showing that it's the only line that works, but that any such line goes through $x$? We know that from the start. (In my explicit construction, $x$ is the point $Ez_1+Fz_2$.)
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 28 at 22:48

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3166400%2funique-line-in-mathbbp4-intersecting-three-pairwise-non-intersecting-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

          Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

          Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ