Direct Sum of Alternating k-tensorsUnderstanding of graded algebraUnderstanding of exterior algebraWhy is the tensor algebra of a vector space non-commutative?Countable index in a direct sumDimension of Direct sum of same Vector SpacesClosed formulas for two Poincaré seriesIndecomposable projective modules in direct sum of algebrasDirect product vs direct sum of infinite dimensional vector spaces?“Direct sum” of linear mapsDecomposition of finite KG-Module in direct Sum of Submodules for a cyclic Group G

I would say: "You are another teacher", but she is a woman and I am a man

Arrow those variables!

Avoiding direct proof while writing proof by induction

What is the difference between 仮定 and 想定?

Dreadful Dastardly Diseases, or Always Atrocious Ailments

What is a romance in Latin?

Could the museum Saturn V's be refitted for one more flight?

What method can I use to design a dungeon difficult enough that the PCs can't make it through without killing them?

Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?

Venezuelan girlfriend wants to travel the USA to be with me. What is the process?

Why doesn't using multiple commands with a || or && conditional work?

Gatling : Performance testing tool

Alternative to sending password over mail?

Can my sorcerer use a spellbook only to collect spells and scribe scrolls, not cast?

How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?

Why can't we play rap on piano?

What exploit are these user agents trying to use?

Why is this clock signal connected to a capacitor to gnd?

Can we compute the area of a quadrilateral with one right angle when we only know the lengths of any three sides?

Why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

Why was the shrinking from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)?

How to tell a function to use the default argument values?



Direct Sum of Alternating k-tensors


Understanding of graded algebraUnderstanding of exterior algebraWhy is the tensor algebra of a vector space non-commutative?Countable index in a direct sumDimension of Direct sum of same Vector SpacesClosed formulas for two Poincaré seriesIndecomposable projective modules in direct sum of algebrasDirect product vs direct sum of infinite dimensional vector spaces?“Direct sum” of linear mapsDecomposition of finite KG-Module in direct Sum of Submodules for a cyclic Group G













0












$begingroup$


I'm reading Loring Tu's "An Introduction to Manifolds", and I'm being tripped up by a statement made in passing on p. 30:



For a finite-dimensional vector space $V$, say of dimension n, define
$$A_*(V) = bigoplus_k=0^infty A_k(V) = bigoplus_k=0^n A_k(V)$$



Here, I understand the $A_k(V)$ components to be the $k$-covectors on $V$, i.e. the set of all alternating $k$-linear functions from $V^k$ to the real numbers. What I don't understand is why the infinite direct sum of these vector spaces is equivalent to the finite direct sum truncated at $n$.



I imagine this has something to do with the dimension of $V$ itself. though I can't see why, for example, an alternating $(n+1)$-linear function would not be admissible here. I think it's likely that I'm not interpreting the notion of a direct sum of vector spaces correctly.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The only alternating $k$ linear function on an $n$ dimensional vector space, with $n < k$, is zero. (Exercise.)
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    Mar 28 at 21:40










  • $begingroup$
    @Lorenzo thank you, that makes sense, and is actually proven quite elegantly a few pages later in the text. A follow-up question then: how is the direct sum meant to be interpreted? To be explicit, a typical element of $A_*(V)$ might look something like $a_i_0 + ... + a_i_n$, with $a_i_k in A_k(V)$, but I'm kind of unclear as to what it means to add two functions that have entirely different domains (i.e. $V$ vs $V times V$ vs. etc.).
    $endgroup$
    – John Gilling
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    it's not necessarily possible to interpret the mixed tensors as functions. It's like the joke: what's an apple plus an orange? An element of the free vector space on apple, orange.
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    You can add them in a formal way by extending them by zero - so they'll become functions on the disjoint union of the products of the V. So you could think of it as a function that takes in a tuple of vectors, with no restrictions on the size of that tuple, and has the appropriate multilinearity.
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    2 days ago















0












$begingroup$


I'm reading Loring Tu's "An Introduction to Manifolds", and I'm being tripped up by a statement made in passing on p. 30:



For a finite-dimensional vector space $V$, say of dimension n, define
$$A_*(V) = bigoplus_k=0^infty A_k(V) = bigoplus_k=0^n A_k(V)$$



Here, I understand the $A_k(V)$ components to be the $k$-covectors on $V$, i.e. the set of all alternating $k$-linear functions from $V^k$ to the real numbers. What I don't understand is why the infinite direct sum of these vector spaces is equivalent to the finite direct sum truncated at $n$.



I imagine this has something to do with the dimension of $V$ itself. though I can't see why, for example, an alternating $(n+1)$-linear function would not be admissible here. I think it's likely that I'm not interpreting the notion of a direct sum of vector spaces correctly.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The only alternating $k$ linear function on an $n$ dimensional vector space, with $n < k$, is zero. (Exercise.)
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    Mar 28 at 21:40










  • $begingroup$
    @Lorenzo thank you, that makes sense, and is actually proven quite elegantly a few pages later in the text. A follow-up question then: how is the direct sum meant to be interpreted? To be explicit, a typical element of $A_*(V)$ might look something like $a_i_0 + ... + a_i_n$, with $a_i_k in A_k(V)$, but I'm kind of unclear as to what it means to add two functions that have entirely different domains (i.e. $V$ vs $V times V$ vs. etc.).
    $endgroup$
    – John Gilling
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    it's not necessarily possible to interpret the mixed tensors as functions. It's like the joke: what's an apple plus an orange? An element of the free vector space on apple, orange.
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    You can add them in a formal way by extending them by zero - so they'll become functions on the disjoint union of the products of the V. So you could think of it as a function that takes in a tuple of vectors, with no restrictions on the size of that tuple, and has the appropriate multilinearity.
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    2 days ago













0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm reading Loring Tu's "An Introduction to Manifolds", and I'm being tripped up by a statement made in passing on p. 30:



For a finite-dimensional vector space $V$, say of dimension n, define
$$A_*(V) = bigoplus_k=0^infty A_k(V) = bigoplus_k=0^n A_k(V)$$



Here, I understand the $A_k(V)$ components to be the $k$-covectors on $V$, i.e. the set of all alternating $k$-linear functions from $V^k$ to the real numbers. What I don't understand is why the infinite direct sum of these vector spaces is equivalent to the finite direct sum truncated at $n$.



I imagine this has something to do with the dimension of $V$ itself. though I can't see why, for example, an alternating $(n+1)$-linear function would not be admissible here. I think it's likely that I'm not interpreting the notion of a direct sum of vector spaces correctly.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm reading Loring Tu's "An Introduction to Manifolds", and I'm being tripped up by a statement made in passing on p. 30:



For a finite-dimensional vector space $V$, say of dimension n, define
$$A_*(V) = bigoplus_k=0^infty A_k(V) = bigoplus_k=0^n A_k(V)$$



Here, I understand the $A_k(V)$ components to be the $k$-covectors on $V$, i.e. the set of all alternating $k$-linear functions from $V^k$ to the real numbers. What I don't understand is why the infinite direct sum of these vector spaces is equivalent to the finite direct sum truncated at $n$.



I imagine this has something to do with the dimension of $V$ itself. though I can't see why, for example, an alternating $(n+1)$-linear function would not be admissible here. I think it's likely that I'm not interpreting the notion of a direct sum of vector spaces correctly.







abstract-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 28 at 21:43









Captain Lama

10.1k1030




10.1k1030










asked Mar 28 at 21:22









John GillingJohn Gilling

33




33











  • $begingroup$
    The only alternating $k$ linear function on an $n$ dimensional vector space, with $n < k$, is zero. (Exercise.)
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    Mar 28 at 21:40










  • $begingroup$
    @Lorenzo thank you, that makes sense, and is actually proven quite elegantly a few pages later in the text. A follow-up question then: how is the direct sum meant to be interpreted? To be explicit, a typical element of $A_*(V)$ might look something like $a_i_0 + ... + a_i_n$, with $a_i_k in A_k(V)$, but I'm kind of unclear as to what it means to add two functions that have entirely different domains (i.e. $V$ vs $V times V$ vs. etc.).
    $endgroup$
    – John Gilling
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    it's not necessarily possible to interpret the mixed tensors as functions. It's like the joke: what's an apple plus an orange? An element of the free vector space on apple, orange.
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    You can add them in a formal way by extending them by zero - so they'll become functions on the disjoint union of the products of the V. So you could think of it as a function that takes in a tuple of vectors, with no restrictions on the size of that tuple, and has the appropriate multilinearity.
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    The only alternating $k$ linear function on an $n$ dimensional vector space, with $n < k$, is zero. (Exercise.)
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    Mar 28 at 21:40










  • $begingroup$
    @Lorenzo thank you, that makes sense, and is actually proven quite elegantly a few pages later in the text. A follow-up question then: how is the direct sum meant to be interpreted? To be explicit, a typical element of $A_*(V)$ might look something like $a_i_0 + ... + a_i_n$, with $a_i_k in A_k(V)$, but I'm kind of unclear as to what it means to add two functions that have entirely different domains (i.e. $V$ vs $V times V$ vs. etc.).
    $endgroup$
    – John Gilling
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    it's not necessarily possible to interpret the mixed tensors as functions. It's like the joke: what's an apple plus an orange? An element of the free vector space on apple, orange.
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    You can add them in a formal way by extending them by zero - so they'll become functions on the disjoint union of the products of the V. So you could think of it as a function that takes in a tuple of vectors, with no restrictions on the size of that tuple, and has the appropriate multilinearity.
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
The only alternating $k$ linear function on an $n$ dimensional vector space, with $n < k$, is zero. (Exercise.)
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Mar 28 at 21:40




$begingroup$
The only alternating $k$ linear function on an $n$ dimensional vector space, with $n < k$, is zero. (Exercise.)
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Mar 28 at 21:40












$begingroup$
@Lorenzo thank you, that makes sense, and is actually proven quite elegantly a few pages later in the text. A follow-up question then: how is the direct sum meant to be interpreted? To be explicit, a typical element of $A_*(V)$ might look something like $a_i_0 + ... + a_i_n$, with $a_i_k in A_k(V)$, but I'm kind of unclear as to what it means to add two functions that have entirely different domains (i.e. $V$ vs $V times V$ vs. etc.).
$endgroup$
– John Gilling
2 days ago





$begingroup$
@Lorenzo thank you, that makes sense, and is actually proven quite elegantly a few pages later in the text. A follow-up question then: how is the direct sum meant to be interpreted? To be explicit, a typical element of $A_*(V)$ might look something like $a_i_0 + ... + a_i_n$, with $a_i_k in A_k(V)$, but I'm kind of unclear as to what it means to add two functions that have entirely different domains (i.e. $V$ vs $V times V$ vs. etc.).
$endgroup$
– John Gilling
2 days ago













$begingroup$
it's not necessarily possible to interpret the mixed tensors as functions. It's like the joke: what's an apple plus an orange? An element of the free vector space on apple, orange.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
2 days ago





$begingroup$
it's not necessarily possible to interpret the mixed tensors as functions. It's like the joke: what's an apple plus an orange? An element of the free vector space on apple, orange.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
2 days ago













$begingroup$
You can add them in a formal way by extending them by zero - so they'll become functions on the disjoint union of the products of the V. So you could think of it as a function that takes in a tuple of vectors, with no restrictions on the size of that tuple, and has the appropriate multilinearity.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
2 days ago




$begingroup$
You can add them in a formal way by extending them by zero - so they'll become functions on the disjoint union of the products of the V. So you could think of it as a function that takes in a tuple of vectors, with no restrictions on the size of that tuple, and has the appropriate multilinearity.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
2 days ago










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3166433%2fdirect-sum-of-alternating-k-tensors%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3166433%2fdirect-sum-of-alternating-k-tensors%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ