Is there a way to solve this equation? (maybe with Lambert's W Function?)Two kind of equations involving natural log and exponentiationHow to solve the exponential inequality $x+3^x<4$A problem in generalizing the Lambert's W functionIs there ANY possible way to solve this equation?Solve analytically an equation with Lambert functionCute problem: Solve this equation involving Lambert-$W$ functionSolving tetration equation with Lambert W FunctionTranscendental Equation.How do I solve the following equation?Solving an equation with Lambert's W function? Or by any other means?

What are some good books on Machine Learning and AI like Krugman, Wells and Graddy's "Essentials of Economics"

Expand and Contract

Size of subfigure fitting its content (tikzpicture)

Why doesn't using multiple commands with a || or && conditional work?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?

Intersection Puzzle

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

Can we compute the area of a quadrilateral with one right angle when we only know the lengths of any three sides?

Im going to France and my passport expires June 19th

Would Slavery Reparations be considered Bills of Attainder and hence Illegal?

Gatling : Performance testing tool

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?

How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?

Can my sorcerer use a spellbook only to collect spells and scribe scrolls, not cast?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

A friend helped me with a presentation – plagiarism or not?

How do I know where to place holes on an instrument?

Why didn't Miles's spider sense work before?

Should I cover my bicycle overnight while bikepacking?

How do I handle a potential work/personal life conflict as the manager of one of my friends?

Why are the 737's rear doors unusable in a water landing?

What does the expression "A Mann!" means

Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?



Is there a way to solve this equation? (maybe with Lambert's W Function?)


Two kind of equations involving natural log and exponentiationHow to solve the exponential inequality $x+3^x<4$A problem in generalizing the Lambert's W functionIs there ANY possible way to solve this equation?Solve analytically an equation with Lambert functionCute problem: Solve this equation involving Lambert-$W$ functionSolving tetration equation with Lambert W FunctionTranscendental Equation.How do I solve the following equation?Solving an equation with Lambert's W function? Or by any other means?













1












$begingroup$


I'd like to know if there is a way to solve the equation
$$xln x=alpha+beta x$$
for known constants $alpha,betainmathbbR$.
I know that Lambert's W Function $W$ can be used to solve
$$xln x=alpha$$
because then $x=e^W(alpha )$, but in the upper problem I can't reformulate the equation in a way that lets me use Lambert's W function.



Does anyone know how to do this? Or any way to find a solution for $x$?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'd like to know if there is a way to solve the equation
    $$xln x=alpha+beta x$$
    for known constants $alpha,betainmathbbR$.
    I know that Lambert's W Function $W$ can be used to solve
    $$xln x=alpha$$
    because then $x=e^W(alpha )$, but in the upper problem I can't reformulate the equation in a way that lets me use Lambert's W function.



    Does anyone know how to do this? Or any way to find a solution for $x$?



    Thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1


      3



      $begingroup$


      I'd like to know if there is a way to solve the equation
      $$xln x=alpha+beta x$$
      for known constants $alpha,betainmathbbR$.
      I know that Lambert's W Function $W$ can be used to solve
      $$xln x=alpha$$
      because then $x=e^W(alpha )$, but in the upper problem I can't reformulate the equation in a way that lets me use Lambert's W function.



      Does anyone know how to do this? Or any way to find a solution for $x$?



      Thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'd like to know if there is a way to solve the equation
      $$xln x=alpha+beta x$$
      for known constants $alpha,betainmathbbR$.
      I know that Lambert's W Function $W$ can be used to solve
      $$xln x=alpha$$
      because then $x=e^W(alpha )$, but in the upper problem I can't reformulate the equation in a way that lets me use Lambert's W function.



      Does anyone know how to do this? Or any way to find a solution for $x$?



      Thanks.







      lambert-w






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 19 '13 at 9:37









      echoesechoes

      83




      83




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Note that $xln(x) - xbeta = xln(xe^-beta)$, so we substitute $y=xe^-beta$ and get
          $$y ln(y) = alpha e^-beta.$$
          Thus $y = exp(W(alpha e^-beta))$ and $x = exp(beta+W(alpha e^-beta))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            We have
            beginalign*
            xlog x &= alpha x +beta\
            iff beta &= x(log x - alpha)\
            &= xlogbigl(xexp(-alpha)bigr)\
            iff exp(-alpha)beta &= exp(-alpha)x logbigl(xexp(-alpha)bigr)\
            iff exp(-alpha)x &= expbigl(W(exp(-alpha)beta)bigr)
            endalign*






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              you swapped α and β
              $endgroup$
              – endolith
              Feb 8 '16 at 4:29


















            1












            $begingroup$

            I will give you a step by step solution.



            • First we have $x ln x=alpha +beta x$.

            • We rearrange the equation to get $x ln x - beta x = alpha$.

            • Factorising gives $x( ln x - beta ) = alpha$.

            • Now we substitute $x= exp ( ln x)$ and multiply both sides by $ exp(-beta)$.

            • Up to now we have
              $$( ln x - beta)e^ln x - beta= alpha e^-beta$$

            • Now take $W$ of both sides and remember that $W(xe^x)=x$, so
              $$ln x - beta= W(alpha e^-beta)$$.

            • Rearranging and taking exponents of both sides gives you the required result.
              $$x =e^ W(alpha e^-beta)+beta$$.





            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Asad Mehasi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f498422%2fis-there-a-way-to-solve-this-equation-maybe-with-lamberts-w-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4












              $begingroup$

              Note that $xln(x) - xbeta = xln(xe^-beta)$, so we substitute $y=xe^-beta$ and get
              $$y ln(y) = alpha e^-beta.$$
              Thus $y = exp(W(alpha e^-beta))$ and $x = exp(beta+W(alpha e^-beta))$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                4












                $begingroup$

                Note that $xln(x) - xbeta = xln(xe^-beta)$, so we substitute $y=xe^-beta$ and get
                $$y ln(y) = alpha e^-beta.$$
                Thus $y = exp(W(alpha e^-beta))$ and $x = exp(beta+W(alpha e^-beta))$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  Note that $xln(x) - xbeta = xln(xe^-beta)$, so we substitute $y=xe^-beta$ and get
                  $$y ln(y) = alpha e^-beta.$$
                  Thus $y = exp(W(alpha e^-beta))$ and $x = exp(beta+W(alpha e^-beta))$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Note that $xln(x) - xbeta = xln(xe^-beta)$, so we substitute $y=xe^-beta$ and get
                  $$y ln(y) = alpha e^-beta.$$
                  Thus $y = exp(W(alpha e^-beta))$ and $x = exp(beta+W(alpha e^-beta))$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 19 '13 at 9:49









                  AbelAbel

                  6,9011119




                  6,9011119





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      We have
                      beginalign*
                      xlog x &= alpha x +beta\
                      iff beta &= x(log x - alpha)\
                      &= xlogbigl(xexp(-alpha)bigr)\
                      iff exp(-alpha)beta &= exp(-alpha)x logbigl(xexp(-alpha)bigr)\
                      iff exp(-alpha)x &= expbigl(W(exp(-alpha)beta)bigr)
                      endalign*






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        you swapped α and β
                        $endgroup$
                        – endolith
                        Feb 8 '16 at 4:29















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      We have
                      beginalign*
                      xlog x &= alpha x +beta\
                      iff beta &= x(log x - alpha)\
                      &= xlogbigl(xexp(-alpha)bigr)\
                      iff exp(-alpha)beta &= exp(-alpha)x logbigl(xexp(-alpha)bigr)\
                      iff exp(-alpha)x &= expbigl(W(exp(-alpha)beta)bigr)
                      endalign*






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        you swapped α and β
                        $endgroup$
                        – endolith
                        Feb 8 '16 at 4:29













                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      We have
                      beginalign*
                      xlog x &= alpha x +beta\
                      iff beta &= x(log x - alpha)\
                      &= xlogbigl(xexp(-alpha)bigr)\
                      iff exp(-alpha)beta &= exp(-alpha)x logbigl(xexp(-alpha)bigr)\
                      iff exp(-alpha)x &= expbigl(W(exp(-alpha)beta)bigr)
                      endalign*






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      We have
                      beginalign*
                      xlog x &= alpha x +beta\
                      iff beta &= x(log x - alpha)\
                      &= xlogbigl(xexp(-alpha)bigr)\
                      iff exp(-alpha)beta &= exp(-alpha)x logbigl(xexp(-alpha)bigr)\
                      iff exp(-alpha)x &= expbigl(W(exp(-alpha)beta)bigr)
                      endalign*







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Sep 19 '13 at 9:49









                      martinimartini

                      70.8k45991




                      70.8k45991











                      • $begingroup$
                        you swapped α and β
                        $endgroup$
                        – endolith
                        Feb 8 '16 at 4:29
















                      • $begingroup$
                        you swapped α and β
                        $endgroup$
                        – endolith
                        Feb 8 '16 at 4:29















                      $begingroup$
                      you swapped α and β
                      $endgroup$
                      – endolith
                      Feb 8 '16 at 4:29




                      $begingroup$
                      you swapped α and β
                      $endgroup$
                      – endolith
                      Feb 8 '16 at 4:29











                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      I will give you a step by step solution.



                      • First we have $x ln x=alpha +beta x$.

                      • We rearrange the equation to get $x ln x - beta x = alpha$.

                      • Factorising gives $x( ln x - beta ) = alpha$.

                      • Now we substitute $x= exp ( ln x)$ and multiply both sides by $ exp(-beta)$.

                      • Up to now we have
                        $$( ln x - beta)e^ln x - beta= alpha e^-beta$$

                      • Now take $W$ of both sides and remember that $W(xe^x)=x$, so
                        $$ln x - beta= W(alpha e^-beta)$$.

                      • Rearranging and taking exponents of both sides gives you the required result.
                        $$x =e^ W(alpha e^-beta)+beta$$.





                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Asad Mehasi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        I will give you a step by step solution.



                        • First we have $x ln x=alpha +beta x$.

                        • We rearrange the equation to get $x ln x - beta x = alpha$.

                        • Factorising gives $x( ln x - beta ) = alpha$.

                        • Now we substitute $x= exp ( ln x)$ and multiply both sides by $ exp(-beta)$.

                        • Up to now we have
                          $$( ln x - beta)e^ln x - beta= alpha e^-beta$$

                        • Now take $W$ of both sides and remember that $W(xe^x)=x$, so
                          $$ln x - beta= W(alpha e^-beta)$$.

                        • Rearranging and taking exponents of both sides gives you the required result.
                          $$x =e^ W(alpha e^-beta)+beta$$.





                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Asad Mehasi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          I will give you a step by step solution.



                          • First we have $x ln x=alpha +beta x$.

                          • We rearrange the equation to get $x ln x - beta x = alpha$.

                          • Factorising gives $x( ln x - beta ) = alpha$.

                          • Now we substitute $x= exp ( ln x)$ and multiply both sides by $ exp(-beta)$.

                          • Up to now we have
                            $$( ln x - beta)e^ln x - beta= alpha e^-beta$$

                          • Now take $W$ of both sides and remember that $W(xe^x)=x$, so
                            $$ln x - beta= W(alpha e^-beta)$$.

                          • Rearranging and taking exponents of both sides gives you the required result.
                            $$x =e^ W(alpha e^-beta)+beta$$.





                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          Asad Mehasi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                          $endgroup$



                          I will give you a step by step solution.



                          • First we have $x ln x=alpha +beta x$.

                          • We rearrange the equation to get $x ln x - beta x = alpha$.

                          • Factorising gives $x( ln x - beta ) = alpha$.

                          • Now we substitute $x= exp ( ln x)$ and multiply both sides by $ exp(-beta)$.

                          • Up to now we have
                            $$( ln x - beta)e^ln x - beta= alpha e^-beta$$

                          • Now take $W$ of both sides and remember that $W(xe^x)=x$, so
                            $$ln x - beta= W(alpha e^-beta)$$.

                          • Rearranging and taking exponents of both sides gives you the required result.
                            $$x =e^ W(alpha e^-beta)+beta$$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          Asad Mehasi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer






                          New contributor




                          Asad Mehasi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          answered Mar 28 at 17:58









                          Asad MehasiAsad Mehasi

                          111




                          111




                          New contributor




                          Asad Mehasi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                          New contributor





                          Asad Mehasi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                          Asad Mehasi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f498422%2fis-there-a-way-to-solve-this-equation-maybe-with-lamberts-w-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                              Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                              Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ